Chinese: Chinput
Japanese: Kinput2
You should find links to Traditional and Simplified Chinese, Japanese and Korean Input Methods from those links, too!
If InteractiveTools had designed HTTP and HTML, they'd be using it, alone, in their basement.
Good luck taking me to court for distributing this, guys!!! The rumour in Vancouver is that you'll try.
| COPYRIGHT NOTICE
| Copyright (c) 2000-2003 interactivetools.com, Inc.
| #540 - 601 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC V6B 5A6, Canada.
| All rights reserved.
|
| All content on the interactivetools.com Web sites and servers including the
| elements of design and layout unless otherwise noted is copyrighted
| material and protected by trade dress and other laws and may not be
| copied or imitated in whole or in part. Violators will be
| prosecuted to the maximum extent possible.
|
| TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS
| interactivetools.com and the interactivetools.com logo are trademarks
| (tm) of interactivetools.com, Inc. "Software for your Website"
| is a trademark (tm) of interactivetools.com, Inc. Other product and
| company names mentioned on the interactivetools.com Web sites may be the
| trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.
|
| TERMS OF USE
| Permission to use document content from the interactivetools.com Web sites may be
| granted to the Resellers and Clients of interactivetools, Inc.
| Please contact interactivetools.com, Inc (webmaster@interactivetools.com) for
| permission or if you have any questions about the Copyright Notice
| and limitations of the Terms of Use.
|
| By viewing the source of this document, you signify you have read
| the above copyright notice and accept the terms of use.
Be sure to pick the right driver! "Cupsomatic" has lots of extra drivers, and probably includes your printer. At work I print on a colour-laser with double-siding and letter or legal paper. It all works.
Just because you originally licensed the code as open source, doesn't mean you can't relicense it many times under many different licenses.
Relicense all the code to this new company in whatever form they prefer. The original open-licensed code will still stick around, and people can keep adding to it...
...but you can't merge their additions back into the non-open version...
meanwhile. . . intro to discrete math and calculus
Next four months:
objects revisited
linked lists revisited
inheritence, overloading, polymorphism, visibility fleshed out
UML
stacks, queues, binary trees, heaps, maybe hashes
recursion
interfaces
meanwhile. . . matrix algebra, more calculus
next four months
big o
induction and recurrence relations
proving program correctness
assembly
stuff. . .
I don't see what the problem with java is. I like them because their documentation is easy and intuitive to navigate, understand and get stuff to work with. The tutorial is pretty nice, too.
This is regarding Ballmer's statement that the Government is giving money to Linux, and not them, and that such is not fair.
I hope it is not breach of copyright to type out from Nader's book, but I really don't think he'd mind:
It's Time To End Corporate Welfare As We Know It Originally appearred in Earch Island Journal, Fall 1996 Taken from The Ralph Nader Reader, and not reprinted with permission of any sort.
The issue of concentration of power and the growing conflict between the civil society and the corporate society is not a conflict that you read about or see on television. So unfortunately, most of us grow up corporate, we don't grow up civic.
If I utter the following words, what images come to mind: crime, violence, welfare and addictors? What comes to mind is street crime; people lining up to get their welfare checks; violence in the streets; and drug dealers - the addictors.
And yet, by any yardstick, there is far more crime, and far more violence, and far more welfare disbursement (and there are far more addictors) in the corporate world than in the impoverished street arena. The federal government's corporate welfare programs number over 120. They are so varied and embedded that we actually grow up thinking that the government interferes with the free enterprise system, rather than subsidizing it.
It's hard to find a major industry today whose principal investments were not first made by the government - in aerospace, telecommunications, biotechnology and agribusiness. Government research and development money funds the drug and pharmaceutical industry. Government research and development funds are given freely to corporations, but they don't announce it in the ads the next day.
Corporate welfare has never been viewed as debilitating. Nobody talks about imposing workfare requirements on corporate welfare recipients or putting them on a program of "two years and you're out." Nobody talks about aid to dependent corporations. It's all talked about in terms of "incentives."
At the local community level, in cities that can't even refurbish their crumbling schools - where children are without enough desks or books - local governments are anteing up three, four, five hundred million dollars to lure very profitable baseball, football and basketball sports moguls who don't want to share the profits. Corporate sports are being subsidized by cities.
Corporations have perfected socializing their losses while they capitalize on their profits. There was the savings-and-loan debacle - and you'll be paying for that until the year 2020. In terms of principal and interest, it was a half-trillion-dollar bailout of 1,000 savings-and-loans banks. Their executives looted, speculated and defrauded people of their savings - and then turned to Washington for a bailout.
Foreign and domestic corporations can go on our land out West. If they discover gold, they can buy the acreage over the gold for no more than $5 an acre. That's been the going rate since the Mining Act of 1872 was enacted. That is taking inflation fighting too far.
There's a new drug called Taxol to fight ovarian cancer. That drug was produced by a grant of $31 million of taxpayer money through the National Institutes of Health, right though the clinical testing process. The formula was then given away to the Bristol-Meyers Squibb company. No royalties were paid to the taxpayer. There was no restraint on the price. Charges now run $10,000 to $15,000 per patient for a series of treatments. If the patients can't pay, they go on Medicaid, and the taxpayer pays at the other end of the cycle, too.
Yet what is the big issue in this country and in Washington when the word "welfare" is spoken? It is the $300 monthly check given a welfare mother, most of which is spent immediately in the consumer economy. But federal corporate welfare is far bigger in dollars. At the federal, state and local levels there is no comparison between the corporate welfare and poverty welfare programs.
We have 179 law schools and probably only fifteen of them (and only recently) offer a single course or seminar on corporate crime. You think that's an accident? Law school curricula are pretty much shaped by the job market, and if the job market has slots in commercial law, bankruptcy law, securities and exchange law, tax law or estate planning law, the law schools will oblige with courses and seminars.
One professor studying corporate crime believes it costs the country $200 billion a year. And yet you don't see many congressional hearings on corporate crime. You see very few newspapers focusing on corporate crime. Yet 50,000 lives a year are lost to air pollution [julius ads from Harpers Magazine: Amount Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill earned last year as CEO of Alcoa: $56,400,000. Rank of Alcoa among the worst U.S. polluters during O'Neill's tenure, according to the National Wildlife Federation: 1. Food for thought: and Bush's tax reduction helps who?] . . . 100,000 [lives] are lost due to toxics and trauma in the workplace, and 420,000 lives are lost due to tobacco smoking. The corporate addictor has an important role here, since it has been shown in recent months that the tobacco companies try to hook youngsters into a lifetime of smoking from age 10 to 15.
When you grow up corporate, you don't learn about the reality of corporate welfare. The programs that shovel huge amounts of taxpayer dollars through subsidies, loan guarantees, giveaways and a variety of clever transfers of taxpayer assets get very little attention.
I think assembly saves a lot of man-hours (eg. mega bucks) because assembly doesn't need any comments or fancy design. Design and comments waste:
A lot of whiteboard markers.
You have to spend soooo much painful gruelling time describing boring things.
When you edit your commenting, say, changing
a sentence, the change cascades down, ruining all the nicely lined up ******** asteriskses, and so you have to redo them all, line by line.
By avoiding just these three boring and very ardurous tasks by coding in assembly (since assembly doesn't need commenting or program design) the world could save mind-boggling amounts of money. Nevermind how much faster all our code would be!
I have a lot of cds I don't listen to. That I don't listen to, ever. What a waste, wouldn't ya say? I have like 200 or so of these music licenses which allow me all these rights: to have and keep and do whatever else pops into mind with the darn shiny discs (save distributing unlicensed copies).
Nevermind the 300 records I accidentally bought at an auction for $12. That's 12 canadian dollars, btw.
So, is what's following a feasable (and legal!) distribution scheme? Call it a sort of airline overbooking with music: if I "ripped" all my cds to mp3s, and then, ummm, signed an affidavit or some such legal sounding thing stating that I had put them all through a blender and doused them in gasoline and incernerated them and then flushed the remains, but still retained the 1 license per album, could I then give that license to a public pool? When you want to listen to a song, you check out the license, and during that period no-one else can listen to it. When you're done, you give the license back to the pool.
The software could even cache your favourite tunes, but disallow you from accessing them until a license freed up.
And then it could even do the dishes and cook me dinner because I'm hungry!
Slashdot Mirror
I wonder if this has any relation to the Robert X. Cringely hard drive.
0 61026_001143.html
Bob's Disk Drive:
http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2006/pulpit_20
The Wired article mentions Iron. Cringely's mentions Stainless Steel?
Chinese: Chinput
Japanese: Kinput2 You should find links to Traditional and Simplified Chinese, Japanese and Korean Input Methods from those links, too!
mod parent down as flame/offtopic
- I regret my previous post.
If InteractiveTools had designed HTTP and HTML, they'd be using it, alone, in their basement.
Good luck taking me to court for distributing this, guys!!! The rumour in Vancouver is that you'll try.
At home:
1. http://localhost:631
2. Device URI "smb://Workgroup/Computer/Printer"
At worK:
1. http://localhost:631
2. Device URI: "smb://USER:PASSWORD@PrintServer/Printer"
Be sure to pick the right driver! "Cupsomatic" has lots of extra drivers, and probably includes your printer. At work I print on a colour-laser with double-siding and letter or legal paper. It all works.
Now We Have Literacy But Why Do We Need It?
Relicense all the code to this new company in whatever form they prefer. The original open-licensed code will still stick around, and people can keep adding to it...
...but you can't merge their additions back into the non-open version...
I think if you save up karma you can actually post something at "+2" right off the bat in exchange for that karma.
That's probably what happened here.
But it isn't about anything!
This story rocks my world. I love the drama of the IRC captures. And the insanity. Gibson is a gem. Julius
First four months:
Next four months:
next four months
I don't see what the problem with java is. I like them because their documentation is easy and intuitive to navigate, understand and get stuff to work with. The tutorial is pretty nice, too.
Globe & Mail (Canada) has a strangely different story on their website.
thai gold
- A lot of whiteboard markers.
- You have to spend soooo much painful gruelling time describing boring things.
- When you edit your commenting, say, changing
a sentence, the change cascades down, ruining all the nicely lined up ******** asteriskses, and so you have to redo them all, line by line.
By avoiding just these three boring and very ardurous tasks by coding in assembly (since assembly doesn't need commenting or program design) the world could save mind-boggling amounts of money. Nevermind how much faster all our code would be!I have a lot of cds I don't listen to. That I don't listen to, ever. What a waste, wouldn't ya say? I have like 200 or so of these music licenses which allow me all these rights: to have and keep and do whatever else pops into mind with the darn shiny discs (save distributing unlicensed copies). Nevermind the 300 records I accidentally bought at an auction for $12. That's 12 canadian dollars, btw. So, is what's following a feasable (and legal!) distribution scheme? Call it a sort of airline overbooking with music: if I "ripped" all my cds to mp3s, and then, ummm, signed an affidavit or some such legal sounding thing stating that I had put them all through a blender and doused them in gasoline and incernerated them and then flushed the remains, but still retained the 1 license per album, could I then give that license to a public pool? When you want to listen to a song, you check out the license, and during that period no-one else can listen to it. When you're done, you give the license back to the pool. The software could even cache your favourite tunes, but disallow you from accessing them until a license freed up. And then it could even do the dishes and cook me dinner because I'm hungry!