The GPLv3's web services clauses are akin to clauses to disallow piping output and input between GPLed and nonGPLed programs; in other words RMS has completely lost it.
Hey dumbass, he didn't say he was still 15. And no, if it is a 15 year old kid who did this, he should not 'rot in jail'. If he takes pws and begins breaking into bank accounts with them, sure.
Ok; decent reply. But isn't it true that widespread fear isn't necessarily bad? For instance, widespread fear of snakes caused Springfield to have an annual 'Whacking Day'. Look at how many snakes they managed to kill. By killing snakes, they managed their fear, in the sense that there was now less snakes to fear.
It isn't as simple as that article paints it. Download netlogo and look for one of the simulations in the social section. You can watch the effects of logo 'turtles' only being comfortable if they are around at least some minimum threshold of turtles of the same color as them. The result is always that the turtles will arrange themselves in such a way that those minimum thresholds are passed throughout almost every point in the distribution.
Unless the boxes are going to be communicating with each other that is a total nonissue. You can communicate behind NAT with anyone else 2-way; as long as they aren't also behind NAT.
Other obvious though(because surveys might be a bit too intrusive, and unreliable): simulate paying customers in a statistically relevant way yourself and see if the sales are getting reported.
Handle this like any other similar problem: randomly survey users on whether they made a purchase. Smaller volume advertisers would be able to get away with it very often, but it would have a panopticon like effect.
If Google can't find out why that takes away the whole purpose of this, or at least of one major aspect of it. The telcos wanted to charge google etc. for preferential access. If they make this offer, then google knows; they don't need discovery. After any such offer they could simply put up a page, saying, "your ISP is treating us differently than the rest of the internet, so we thought we'd treat them differently as well: you can't search today."
So, back when the G++ guys were deciding to make the C++ front-end to GCC, they should have instead just compiled the C++ to C++, sinc you know everyone uses GCC, and the fact that C++ is standardized doesn't mean anything.
"If they forget it, they are told, the HD is toast...but that makes them MUCH more careful!" No, that makes them write the password down somewhere. Also, in this case telling them you can recover it would probably make them use a stronger password.
Google is completely open; you can connect with any jabber client and you can also connect any jabber server to their network (e.g. you can talk to people on google talk from your own jabber server and have a name like firstname@lastname.com).
Slashdot Mirror
As I understand it, free speech allows people to say bad things about you against your will.
It is possible for a legislative solution to handle this without interferring with people who are willing to say good things about you.
The GPLv3's web services clauses are akin to clauses to disallow piping output and input between GPLed and nonGPLed programs; in other words RMS has completely lost it.
That wouldn't make sense as he bas been a proponent of the estate tax because it encourages giving to charities!
Hey dumbass, he didn't say he was still 15. And no, if it is a 15 year old kid who did this, he should not 'rot in jail'. If he takes pws and begins breaking into bank accounts with them, sure.
Internally the server just sends a message to nickserv when you do this, so it wouldn't have helped.
Ok; decent reply. But isn't it true that widespread fear isn't necessarily bad? For instance, widespread fear of snakes caused Springfield to have an annual 'Whacking Day'. Look at how many snakes they managed to kill. By killing snakes, they managed their fear, in the sense that there was now less snakes to fear.
I hope you aren't in a dorm room.
"sophisty"
That looks like some prototypical typo from something like a column in a local newspaper. Also, nice troll.
It isn't as simple as that article paints it. Download netlogo and look for one of the simulations in the social section. You can watch the effects of logo 'turtles' only being comfortable if they are around at least some minimum threshold of turtles of the same color as them. The result is always that the turtles will arrange themselves in such a way that those minimum thresholds are passed throughout almost every point in the distribution.
Homer overcame fear when he attempted to ramp bart's skateboard over a canyon, and look where it got him; it isn't as simple as one little word.
'so long as those rights are stamped with the approval of the electorate.'
The US constitution also involved an electorate.
Beagle doesn't do what WinFS was going to do. In fact, there is something very similar to beagle that *is* to be shipped with Vista.
Unless the boxes are going to be communicating with each other that is a total nonissue. You can communicate behind NAT with anyone else 2-way; as long as they aren't also behind NAT.
Other obvious though(because surveys might be a bit too intrusive, and unreliable): simulate paying customers in a statistically relevant way yourself and see if the sales are getting reported.
Handle this like any other similar problem: randomly survey users on whether they made a purchase. Smaller volume advertisers would be able to get away with it very often, but it would have a panopticon like effect.
If Google can't find out why that takes away the whole purpose of this, or at least of one major aspect of it. The telcos wanted to charge google etc. for preferential access. If they make this offer, then google knows; they don't need discovery. After any such offer they could simply put up a page, saying, "your ISP is treating us differently than the rest of the internet, so we thought we'd treat them differently as well: you can't search today."
Campaign finance reform has all of the trappings of a bad hack.
Yo, my friend Shannon wants a word with you.
The translation to bytecode isn't much more than what an assembler does... maybe it's an assembler.
So, back when the G++ guys were deciding to make the C++ front-end to GCC, they should have instead just compiled the C++ to C++, sinc you know everyone uses GCC, and the fact that C++ is standardized doesn't mean anything.
"If they forget it, they are told, the HD is toast...but that makes them MUCH more careful!" No, that makes them write the password down somewhere. Also, in this case telling them you can recover it would probably make them use a stronger password.
Read his other interviews he has already answered this.
Google is completely open; you can connect with any jabber client and you can also connect any jabber server to their network (e.g. you can talk to people on google talk from your own jabber server and have a name like firstname@lastname.com).
2>>x... come on man.
That will only get called each time the top loop executes! We are talking about a deep nest here!