So you want to hold back your best cyclists because you're afraid of getting the occasional boo-boo? Better idea: don't hire muppets in the first place.
this is so important because california's legislature is so horribly disfunctional, and because you need 2/3 vote to pass any bill that levies taxes, it means a minority can basically shut down regular operation.
btdubs this was just one of the reforms passed by Arnold Schwarzenegger, who I think will be remembered as one of the best governors in CA history.
First, the legislature was so screwed up because it used to take a 2/3 majority to pass a budget, which meant the minority party could shut down the government if they threw a hissy fit. Since Prop 25 passed in 2010, we've had a Democratic majority in both houses and a Democratic governor and gridlock is gone. Balanced budget! Surplus! Arnold didn't support Prop 25.
Second, Arnold didn't "pass" anything regarding open primaries. Prop 14 was a constitutional amendment that passed both houses of the legislature and then was approved by the voters. Arnold supported it but didn't pass it.
While I've never been ticketed, I always ride on the side of the left lane (against traffic).
So you're one of those jerks I have to move my bike into traffic to go around as you head towards me in my lane because you don't have the survival instincts of all other mammals? Or is it that you're a sociopath?
You're wrong. If there is no bike lane, a cyclist is supposed to be traveling as far right as is practicable and safe (there are several exceptions, of course). That could mean the paved shoulder and it could mean the far right of a lane. What you're saying is that a cyclist should always take the whole right lane, which is incorrect. From your example, the bike is already on the far right of the right lane so passing in that small space is just a continuation of what they're already doing, it's just that now the bike is passing cars rather than being passed.
Because there aren't shelters filled with abused men and their children they took with them when they escaped the abusive relationship (that I'm aware of). I'm sure that won't stop your miserable whining, though.
I've ordered several items from aliexpress and haven't had a problem. If I did have a problem, I would have withheld payment, since payment doesn't actually get done until the buyer receives and is satisfied with the product (though you provide your CC# when you order). I'm sure they know the bad reputation buying from China has so they're doing this to overcome that. I made a small purchase first, then bought several more of the same type of items (cycling kit) from the same seller after that purchase went well. You do have to take a "buyer beware" attitude but my experience has been good.
I would also like to point out that not all of my eBay experiences, especially in the early days and certainly not from Eastern European countries, were wonderful. Ah, the adventure of globalization at the personal level!
The correct interpretation is 'Thou shalt not murder'.
Interpretation? Interpretation? Interpretation of what? You mean god left something like killing open to interpretation? What, did he say "Thou shalt not bump off thy neighbor."? Not very smart of god to leave something so important like that up for debate.
Slashdot Mirror
So you want to hold back your best cyclists because you're afraid of getting the occasional boo-boo? Better idea: don't hire muppets in the first place.
The only startling thing is your poor spelling and grammar. Read.
But good developers make less mistakes in a language where there's less freedom...
Some of us like having the training wheels off our bikes.
Remember that a motorist making a left turn in Santa Barbara doesn't mean the same thing as it does in London.
Code reviews can help you with that. Your company should try them.
The proposed settlement mainly benefits the lawyers and not the people damaged. What a surprise.
No email archiving? really? Of an IRS director?
Do you know what the data retention policy/rule/law is for an IRS director? Not what you think it should be but what it actually is?
this is so important because california's legislature is so horribly disfunctional, and because you need 2/3 vote to pass any bill that levies taxes, it means a minority can basically shut down regular operation.
btdubs this was just one of the reforms passed by Arnold Schwarzenegger, who I think will be remembered as one of the best governors in CA history.
First, the legislature was so screwed up because it used to take a 2/3 majority to pass a budget, which meant the minority party could shut down the government if they threw a hissy fit. Since Prop 25 passed in 2010, we've had a Democratic majority in both houses and a Democratic governor and gridlock is gone. Balanced budget! Surplus! Arnold didn't support Prop 25.
Second, Arnold didn't "pass" anything regarding open primaries. Prop 14 was a constitutional amendment that passed both houses of the legislature and then was approved by the voters. Arnold supported it but didn't pass it.
Sounds rough. I am so glad there is no politics in jobs outside of education.</sarcasm>
Good choice because, goodness knows, you can only copy/paste Perl...
NEWS FLASH: Dumbass programmers make dumbass mistakes and produce dumbass code.
Those of us at the adults' table get to use real forks and steak knives and we don't hurt ourselves at all.
But really, you wanted Mojolicious.
This.
To be fair, most of that is probably getters and setters.
Please cite the law that you claim is being broken.
While I've never been ticketed, I always ride on the side of the left lane (against traffic).
So you're one of those jerks I have to move my bike into traffic to go around as you head towards me in my lane because you don't have the survival instincts of all other mammals? Or is it that you're a sociopath?
You're wrong. If there is no bike lane, a cyclist is supposed to be traveling as far right as is practicable and safe (there are several exceptions, of course). That could mean the paved shoulder and it could mean the far right of a lane. What you're saying is that a cyclist should always take the whole right lane, which is incorrect. From your example, the bike is already on the far right of the right lane so passing in that small space is just a continuation of what they're already doing, it's just that now the bike is passing cars rather than being passed.
He debunks the paper by claiming the data it used, while valid, was incomplete (i.e. cherry-picked).
The data doesn't lie.
That paper is not about facts but statistics (as in "lies, damned lies, and statistics"). Not the same thing.
Read.
Because there aren't shelters filled with abused men and their children they took with them when they escaped the abusive relationship (that I'm aware of). I'm sure that won't stop your miserable whining, though.
I've ordered several items from aliexpress and haven't had a problem. If I did have a problem, I would have withheld payment, since payment doesn't actually get done until the buyer receives and is satisfied with the product (though you provide your CC# when you order). I'm sure they know the bad reputation buying from China has so they're doing this to overcome that. I made a small purchase first, then bought several more of the same type of items (cycling kit) from the same seller after that purchase went well. You do have to take a "buyer beware" attitude but my experience has been good.
I would also like to point out that not all of my eBay experiences, especially in the early days and certainly not from Eastern European countries, were wonderful. Ah, the adventure of globalization at the personal level!
Ah, I stand corrected. Thanks for the link.
Still, planning to build a nuclear plant in a state with a "moratorium" on new nuclear plants (since 1976) is a pretty dicey business plan.
Um, no.
The correct interpretation is 'Thou shalt not murder'.
Interpretation? Interpretation? Interpretation of what? You mean god left something like killing open to interpretation? What, did he say "Thou shalt not bump off thy neighbor."? Not very smart of god to leave something so important like that up for debate.
Perhaps this is all a part of the vast right-wing conspiracy against green energy. Can't let the hippies win!