jobs.osdn.com is run by an outside firm, using their own software. It's the same as Microsoft DNS running on Linux. It's outsourced so it runs something different than the company would like to have you believe. Besides, does it really matter what kind of server an service runs upon?
I doubt they care about anyone else's problems with intergration. Anything that can force people to use NT. They're solely in it for the money, not for more altruistic reasons. If your running Netware they'll probably not help, just send you a bunch of brocshures on the total cost of ownership and some such non-sense. They won't ignore, just keep telling you the perfectly good Netware or Unix server is broken. They're not going to be happy until everyone is dependant on their OS, and then they can raise the prices at will. It's really like crack. The first few are free, and then you can afford the 3rd and 4th, but by the 5th time its so expensive you've got to turn to stealing. When you think Microsoft, think crack dealer.
It's not forced licensing. They can form a company between the 5 companies and not license the song to anyone, since it would be legal for the sub-company to use the product without a license. That's legal and would not violate the provisions of this bill at all. This bill is a start, but it needs work and it probably won't even make it out of sub-commitee, let alone the fact that the President will veto it since it takes away rights of business and gives them back to the consumers. (We don't want that no do we?) Without forced licensing this wouldn't work at all.
While my system at home is a cable modem; my coworkers are having lots of problems with our corporate IPSec software if they run PPPoE.
That sounds like you bought crappy software and didn't check it out before you bought it. IPSec works just fine over PPP and PPPoE. In fact, it shouldn't even be messing with the PPP frames, just like it shouldn't be messing with the Ethernet frames. It shouldn't know or care what it is being run over. It playes with TCP frames, nothing else. If it was then it is a problem with the IPSec software, not PPPoE. PPPoX, Ethernet, ATM, etc, should all work at the lowest level, the IPSec should be in the lowest level of the IP stack. Don't blame PPPoE because your software sucks.
By and large I've used PPPoE for about a year now, and have never had a problem doing anything "creative". Maybe you'd just prefer a regualar old, ethernet connection, which is your choice. But no one ever gets what the choose. The system provides you with a routable IP address and a place for the IP Packets to flow through, which is all you really needed to talk to the rest of the world. If you need anything else to be creative, then something is drasticly wrong.
The problem lies in that NuSphere wrote custom software of their own, and the GPL forces them to relinquish their copyright control over there own creation because they happened to derive their final product from the mySQL stuff.
No, NuSphere does not relinquish control of their copyright, but they must release they're program under the same terms as the rest of the GPL program, or are prohibited from distrubiting it.
Except they're allowing the case to proceed a normal speed. It's still going to take a good long time to actually get a remedy. I feel it will be sometime after the release of Windows ZR or something silly like that. XP won't be blocked at the speed they're going.
Except for lying to your boss, thier plan seemed entierly reasonable. Just fake a part until you can get around to implementing it. Sometimes it helps to get the rest of it done, and them move back to the other parts.
Even then, how often would the message be attached to incoming mail? SirCam has it's own MailServer embedded within it. Unless the firewall is attaching it to all outgoing mail, then it would never even see the light of day.
What IETF hopes and what actually does occur are two different things. The ISPs will charge for each address and be very stingy with them, solely because they can.
Compressing an infinite set would be pointless, since their is always more data and you don't gain anything. These sets are FINITE. Besides. What exactly have to do with compression. Compession is taking into account "patterns" and compressing that way. If a set of random numbers are drawn from a hat, the probablity that a number is repeated is small, but there. And the probablity that a number drawn from set A is in set B is not zero, but 1/x as x->inifity. Being zero, and being almost zero are two different things.
That's wrong. A truely random system has a probabilty that the compression would work. It could genenrate a set of numbers where all are about the same. Probability is low, but the chance is there.
This is only true if the content is on their servers. On customer's servers they are legally the same as the phone company, only providing the wire and the telephone or IP address.
One slight problem, you really can't make money off just the telephone network any more. They are now being forced to use services to make the money. You see economics has taken hold and pushed the marginal profit to zero. No one can make money off just the network now.
But I really think that this whole "movement" is just some people pining for the days of the "Information SuperHighway". The network described sounds just like the proposals back in the early 90's for it. High speed video, text, interactive TV. Remeber that? Which would be all well and good, except that the Internet already existed, the Web had just been invented, so everyone just used those instead of re-investing. (The start-up costs are lower since there was no R&D costs.) This really is just the network providers ( Mainly AT&T and its subsideraies @Home, etc ) wanting to make money on n idea that they think got unfairly buried. If the models don't fit, they really need to change their models, not the internet.
My guess is at the rate people upgrade their computers, there are so many old copies of the TCP/IP software, that getting rid of the current network is impossible. Even for needed upgrades like IPv6
Actually since 1943 FDR has been a
liar. The SS Numbers have been used as national ID ever since. They are supposed to be required by all states for Driver Licenses as well (airports are required by law to reject any DL without the number on it.), but most states and airports allow you to ignore that rule. The problem really isn't government use, but the fact that every coorperation on the planet has decided this will be the primary key for the user, instead of making up their own. And then they'll use the number for both authentition and identification, compounding the problem even more. Is it really that hard for someone to generate a new random number for a user. I'm sure RSA could help somehow on this one, since they really like generating random numbers. I doubt we'll ever get rid of the silly things now, even if the Social Security department collaspes.
It was only a requirement if the messaging service was extended to other area's like voice messaging or video messaging. Other than that they can keep it as locked up as they want.
If they have the most market share only because they were first, then everyone would be using a Newton. CE's erosion is going a lot slower than most people predicted and is close to stalling out. PalmOS was designed well for what it does and did it on the first time out. WinCE took a while to do what Palm did. If the first product is crap, then being first to market doesn't mean squat.
With palm I doubt it will be that bad. They've never shown any real intention from what makes plam so great. Even Motorola was EOL the old 68000 Dragonball, they really needed to move to a new platform eventually. They'll probably have an emulator to execute the old code (the new ARM is easily more powerful that the old chips, as referenced by the WinCE emulator discussed eariler today), but in the end I expect they'll stick with ARM. Probably even stick with the Dragonball processor, since the next version will have the AMR technology in it. Just because WinCE decided to take the brain dead move of making incopmatable and different versions of the same OS, doesn't mean Palm won't do the same thing
.
Funny. Russia has way more reliable rockets over all. The number of failures to launches is greater for NASA and the ESA than it is for Russia. You have a serious NIH syndrome. suggest looking into it or maybe checking facts before actually saying that NASA builds more reliable rockets.
Slashdot Mirror
jobs.osdn.com is run by an outside firm, using their own software. It's the same as Microsoft DNS running on Linux. It's outsourced so it runs something different than the company would like to have you believe. Besides, does it really matter what kind of server an service runs upon?
I doubt they care about anyone else's problems with intergration. Anything that can force people to use NT. They're solely in it for the money, not for more altruistic reasons. If your running Netware they'll probably not help, just send you a bunch of brocshures on the total cost of ownership and some such non-sense. They won't ignore, just keep telling you the perfectly good Netware or Unix server is broken. They're not going to be happy until everyone is dependant on their OS, and then they can raise the prices at will. It's really like crack. The first few are free, and then you can afford the 3rd and 4th, but by the 5th time its so expensive you've got to turn to stealing. When you think Microsoft, think crack dealer.
It's not forced licensing. They can form a company between the 5 companies and not license the song to anyone, since it would be legal for the sub-company to use the product without a license. That's legal and would not violate the provisions of this bill at all. This bill is a start, but it needs work and it probably won't even make it out of sub-commitee, let alone the fact that the President will veto it since it takes away rights of business and gives them back to the consumers. (We don't want that no do we?) Without forced licensing this wouldn't work at all.
You're not that big of a fan then, since season 4 started broadcasting in the US markets 3 weeks ago.
While my system at home is a cable modem; my coworkers are having lots of problems with our corporate IPSec software if they run PPPoE.
That sounds like you bought crappy software and didn't check it out before you bought it. IPSec works just fine over PPP and PPPoE. In fact, it shouldn't even be messing with the PPP frames, just like it shouldn't be messing with the Ethernet frames. It shouldn't know or care what it is being run over. It playes with TCP frames, nothing else. If it was then it is a problem with the IPSec software, not PPPoE. PPPoX, Ethernet, ATM, etc, should all work at the lowest level, the IPSec should be in the lowest level of the IP stack. Don't blame PPPoE because your software sucks.
By and large I've used PPPoE for about a year now, and have never had a problem doing anything "creative". Maybe you'd just prefer a regualar old, ethernet connection, which is your choice. But no one ever gets what the choose. The system provides you with a routable IP address and a place for the IP Packets to flow through, which is all you really needed to talk to the rest of the world. If you need anything else to be creative, then something is drasticly wrong.
It would be easier now with Wavelan or the sort. It's cheaper, unlicensed, and easier to set up. Some people are already doing it.
It doesn't seem to be much of a problem for me since I'll install Mozilla Releases using the RPMs. It even makes Nautilus run faster.
The problem lies in that NuSphere wrote custom software of their own, and the GPL forces them to relinquish their copyright control over there own creation because they happened to derive their final product from the mySQL stuff.
No, NuSphere does not relinquish control of their copyright, but they must release they're program under the same terms as the rest of the GPL program, or are prohibited from distrubiting it.
Except they're allowing the case to proceed a normal speed. It's still going to take a good long time to actually get a remedy. I feel it will be sometime after the release of Windows ZR or something silly like that. XP won't be blocked at the speed they're going.
Except for lying to your boss, thier plan seemed entierly reasonable. Just fake a part until you can get around to implementing it. Sometimes it helps to get the rest of it done, and them move back to the other parts.
Even then, how often would the message be attached to incoming mail? SirCam has it's own MailServer embedded within it. Unless the firewall is attaching it to all outgoing mail, then it would never even see the light of day.
What IETF hopes and what actually does occur are two different things. The ISPs will charge for each address and be very stingy with them, solely because they can.
Compressing an infinite set would be pointless, since their is always more data and you don't gain anything. These sets are FINITE. Besides. What exactly have to do with compression. Compession is taking into account "patterns" and compressing that way. If a set of random numbers are drawn from a hat, the probablity that a number is repeated is small, but there. And the probablity that a number drawn from set A is in set B is not zero, but 1/x as x->inifity. Being zero, and being almost zero are two different things.
That's wrong. A truely random system has a probabilty that the compression would work. It could genenrate a set of numbers where all are about the same. Probability is low, but the chance is there.
This is only true if the content is on their servers. On customer's servers they are legally the same as the phone company, only providing the wire and the telephone or IP address.
One slight problem, you really can't make money off just the telephone network any more. They are now being forced to use services to make the money. You see economics has taken hold and pushed the marginal profit to zero. No one can make money off just the network now.
But I really think that this whole "movement" is just some people pining for the days of the "Information SuperHighway". The network described sounds just like the proposals back in the early 90's for it. High speed video, text, interactive TV. Remeber that? Which would be all well and good, except that the Internet already existed, the Web had just been invented, so everyone just used those instead of re-investing. (The start-up costs are lower since there was no R&D costs.) This really is just the network providers ( Mainly AT&T and its subsideraies @Home, etc ) wanting to make money on n idea that they think got unfairly buried. If the models don't fit, they really need to change their models, not the internet.
My guess is at the rate people upgrade their computers, there are so many old copies of the TCP/IP software, that getting rid of the current network is impossible. Even for needed upgrades like IPv6
Actually since 1943 FDR has been a liar. The SS Numbers have been used as national ID ever since. They are supposed to be required by all states for Driver Licenses as well (airports are required by law to reject any DL without the number on it.), but most states and airports allow you to ignore that rule. The problem really isn't government use, but the fact that every coorperation on the planet has decided this will be the primary key for the user, instead of making up their own. And then they'll use the number for both authentition and identification, compounding the problem even more. Is it really that hard for someone to generate a new random number for a user. I'm sure RSA could help somehow on this one, since they really like generating random numbers. I doubt we'll ever get rid of the silly things now, even if the Social Security department collaspes.
It was only a requirement if the messaging service was extended to other area's like voice messaging or video messaging. Other than that they can keep it as locked up as they want.
No it's.... while( upgrade.exists() == true )
{
upgrade.sell
}
See it's much easier this way.
If they have the most market share only because they were first, then everyone would be using a Newton. CE's erosion is going a lot slower than most people predicted and is close to stalling out. PalmOS was designed well for what it does and did it on the first time out. WinCE took a while to do what Palm did. If the first product is crap, then being first to market doesn't mean squat.
With palm I doubt it will be that bad. They've never shown any real intention from what makes plam so great. Even Motorola was EOL the old 68000 Dragonball, they really needed to move to a new platform eventually. They'll probably have an emulator to execute the old code (the new ARM is easily more powerful that the old chips, as referenced by the WinCE emulator discussed eariler today), but in the end I expect they'll stick with ARM. Probably even stick with the Dragonball processor, since the next version will have the AMR technology in it. Just because WinCE decided to take the brain dead move of making incopmatable and different versions of the same OS, doesn't mean Palm won't do the same thing .
Funny. Russia has way more reliable rockets over all. The number of failures to launches is greater for NASA and the ESA than it is for Russia. You have a serious NIH syndrome. suggest looking into it or maybe checking facts before actually saying that NASA builds more reliable rockets.
Two reasons, name collisions between districts (and everyone else who's squatting) and they fact they are cheaper.
I wasn't talking about the type of TV being broadcast, just the general content. Sorry for the confusion.
But their not going to be showing HDTV on that signal, just more of the same old crap.