Slashdot Mirror


Best Sci Fi Currently On Television?

A few months ago a friend recommended Farscape, and I started watching. The first season was flat, but the current season is absolutely amazing. So I started watching Lexx just because I had hope in TV sci fi. (I blame Voyager) I'll run a poll on this later, but I'd like to just throw this out: what is the best sci fi on TV? What do people like? Why? I like Farscape because the plot this season has been really interesting (and I even dig the device where the split the main char so they could have silly episodes interspersed with serious ones) and Lexx... well Lexx is just seriously bizarre: I love the wacky humor and terrible B effects. (thanks to everyone in Germany that recommended it. Wow! You werent kidding). Are there any other nuggets of joy out there that I'm missing? The scary thing is that the Sci-Fi channel has finally edged out Comedy Central and Cartoon Network on my Tivo for disk space.

489 comments

  1. LEXX is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Keep on watching LEXX. It gets better and better.

    What I like the most about are the bizarre plots and heavy sexual (vanilla, homo and bestiality) innuendo.

    LEXX is definitely not classical mainstream sci-fi. It's more like a mixture of old sci-fi (flying around in the space, organic ships etc.) with underground sci-fi (S/M, questionable ethics).

    1. Re:LEXX is great! by Transwarp+Conduit · · Score: 1

      I've found LEXX to be something of a mixed bag, personally... brilliant in some episodes, excreable in others. I have to admit that, at first, I disliked the show intensely - but that, as it turned out, was primarily due to the stupid way in which the Sci-Fi Channel chose to premiere the series, by dropping us right into the middle of season 2 and running, then re-running, four or five of the most sexually-charged episodes out of sequence. (Which, of course, meant that nothing going on made the slightest bit of sense.) Once they actually ran the four TV-movies which comprised "season 1", then started running season 2 in the correct order, I started getting into it.

      Season 1 was pretty good, although "Brunnis" was a bit scattershot in focus and "Eating Pattern" dragged in a few places. (Giggerota's performance in "Brunnis" was so gleefully over-the-top, though, that you have to love it even if the plot was utter nonsense. :) )
      Season 2 started out promisingly enough, then kind of went off the rails a bit with stories like "Love Grows" and "White Trash"... but once they got back on track with the whole Mantrid theme (sorry, Scorchmon, I liked Mantrid!) Season 2 wound up with a bang - literally. :)
      Season 3, I wasn't sure about until about halfway through it; my initial reaction was that they'd gone off the rails again, and were just being weird for the sake of weirdness... fortunately, after about five episodes or so, the pieces started clicking into place.
      Season 4, well... I don't know; I'm having difficulty buying into the premise that they seem to be trying to hang the season's story arc off of; like Season 3, this one may be a "late bloomer" which will start to click about halfway through. We'll see.

    2. Re:LEXX is great! by Scorchmon · · Score: 1

      Lexx is indeed great. I think the second season episodes weren't that great as a whole because of that stupid villain, Mantrid. His robot arms were the only interesting concept. Now, they have Prince who is perfect. He's clever and menacing while still remaining mysterious. You never know exactly what he has planned. Thus, the third season was great. This season seems hopeful even though the first episode wasn't that great and the second was only okay. I'm confused why they're on earth though as I felt that the writers worked better in coming up with their own wacky planets.

  2. hlep me by dzeja · · Score: 1

    cdmrTaco mad my grammer and speling bad I thikn ill try hooked on phonic

    --
    Never Underestimate the Power of Stupid People in Large Groups.
  3. Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that would have to be Fox news.

    (Although perhaps it is better described as comedy. It's a bit hard to pin down.)

    1. Re:Clearly by unitron · · Score: 2

      If you want to understand the thinking behind Fox News (or most anything from Fox) read Arthur C. Clarke's short story "I Remember Babylon". Then substitute profits for politics.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Clearly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well...that's a tough call. I think it's more like this though: Any media that isn't completely bent over for the left wingers seems pretty far right relative to what most people are used to seeing. Media that leans mildly right seems absolutely insane to alot of those same people. It's a relative thing. Heck...by your standards alot of other people would find Dan Rather on CBS to be quite the SciFi icon.

      People who don't read slashdot and salon with a grain of salt the size of a Buick truely make me worry about the future.

  4. Re:define scifi by WowTIP · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wonder if Miami Vice could be defined as scifi? Seems like a totally different universe... :)

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
  5. Dune? by WowTIP · · Score: 1

    They said The Dune series was pretty nice. Wonder when/if they will show it here in Sweden...

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
  6. What about the best episode ever: THE FIFTH RACE by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    Okay, I LOVE stargate and there are TONS of episodes that are great, but the one that really pushes the show along and takes a lot of stress off of the SGC team is knowing that they are not alone in their struggle. The episode: The Fifth Race, reveals more secrets from the Asgard. If you haven't seen it, SEE IT!

  7. Andromeda Great, Lexx good, Farscape never seen by Lord_Shaper · · Score: 1

    Just my two cents I felt that sci-fi on TV was getting pretty lame. I loved the first 4 made for TV movies of Lexx (if u hav'nt seen go get them now there on DVD). The next two seasons of lexx well... I caught a epp of andromeda one day And BOOM!!! what a great show I was turn off from watching it when I first heard of it (kevin sorbo) but its got a great plot with awasome FX's and compeling charcters check it out if u get a chance. Never watched Farscape but I've heard nothing but good things so I might have to check it out

  8. Re:I can explain it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marina Sirtis really has no breasts to speak of.
    Gates McFadden also didn't have to wear standard unfiform in ST:TNG.

    Sirtis might be explained as having no real 'rank' of her own, and instead of being a military officer, she was 'counselor.'
    My problem with that theory would be the episode in which she needed to sacrifice Geordi in her sim training to advance to a bridge command status, in which she also wore a uniform.

    Perhaps they simply felt it would be a waste of the female main characters, to make them dress like retards every episode. But if that was their goal, they failed. Sirtis had an ugly uniform color, and besides being too old to be attractive, McFadden's outfit might as well have been a suit of plate mail.

  9. Lexx is for schwackers. by FrankieBoy · · Score: 1

    Lame dialog, stupid obvious jokes, sucky scripts, poor acting, lousy special effects, lips that are about to explode from too much Collagen...come on people! This is the worst exploitive crap on TV today. It's on the same lines as Zena or Hercules. Typical eye-candy for those of you with one hand on the remote and the other... I'll take Dr. Who/B5/FarScape over this nonsense any day.

  10. None by B'Trey · · Score: 2

    There IS no science fiction currently on televisions that I'm aware of. There's lots of fantasy with a scientific bent, but no real sci-fi.

    --

    "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

  11. Science Fiction by ajs · · Score: 2
    Reality check, folks; the following are not science fiction:
    • The West Wing -- Two angles were mentioned. On the alternate-universe angle, it's not. It's just fiction. There's no substantial, "what if" premise related to a historical event (what if the president were a human being who could think for himself doesn't quite count). On the science angle, there's science in the show (good science), but very little speculation. Speculation is a key to science fiction, and the dividing line between Law and Order (which had a whole lot of science) and Viper (a bad show, but clearly science fiction for its speculation).
    • Buffy, Angel, et al. -- Nope. These shows are fantasy pure and simple. The line gets muddy (is The Lathe of Heaven science fiction or fantasy?), but vampires and their respective hunters don't even get a smudge on their wardrobes
    I will say that, as an SF snob, I find the fawning over Lexx to be distasteful, but I'm pleased with the recent Farscape for actually getting the plot moving again. Best SF on TV is still B5 re-runs and the Iron Chef (which is clearly about the mandroid who plays Chairman Kaga ;-)
  12. Re:SciFi Channel Dune was Great by whosit · · Score: 1

    I while found that the plot of Dune on the Sci-Fi channel more closely followed the books. My only problem with it was that Paul sounded like a whiny bitch. He never sounded like a whiny bitch in the book.

  13. Re:Angel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and you guys wonder why women stay away from slashdot!

  14. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by ouija147 · · Score: 1

    No WAY! If this is true the marketing people for BBC America should be shot. I watch BBCA in the evening and have never seen an ad for the Doctor. I am PISSED. I could have been time shifting this to watch in the evening. Don't these people have a clue?!?! Too much background noise to sift out the intersting bits.

  15. Re:Earth: Final Conflict by strix999 · · Score: 1

    I really like EFC, but the ending was kinda strange. I'm really curious whats going to become of it once they get done showing the top 10 or 5 or whatever episodes. I don't know it seems I'll watch anything as long as it on TV. :) I'm not paranoid but everyones out to get me.

  16. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by mdwebster · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the correction. It must have been that the lopped off chins & foreheads are more apparent with the black bar on the top and bottom cause I didn't notice it at all in the original airings. But I'll be damned if it didn't bug the hell out of me on the 5 or 6 episodes I rewatched on the letterbox edition. Psychological impact from the black bars no doubt ...

  17. Forget about the Special FX... by MrEfficient · · Score: 3, Funny
    The most important reason to watch Lexx is Xenia Seeburg. She is absolutely amazing. Shame on you for not mentioning her.

    --
    Check out AbiWord.
    1. Re:Forget about the Special FX... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another plumped thing those two big-lipped superbabes have in common: full, hearty, bulbous big toes, if you're into the foot thing...

    2. Re:Forget about the Special FX... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      No kidding.

      The only reason to watch both series is exactly the same thing: enormous, succulent, artificially-plumped lips.

      I liked Xenia more with the goofy short red haircut, tho.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
    3. Re:Forget about the Special FX... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Xenia Seeburg is great if you want luscious lips, big tits, lots of curves - in short, your high school sexual fantasies. One could say the same of "Seven of Nine" on ST Voyager, but that's not reason enough to watch ST Voyager.

      Now, if you want hot sci fi babes, but want something more than the obvious eye candy, check out Claudia Black on Farscape. There's a beautiful woman, a talented actress, and she is absolutely captivating on camera. She's not classicly beautiful (her face is more elongated and "interesting" than Hollywood likes) or blatantly "sexy" (nice body, but athletic rather than lots of "T&A"), but the more I watch her the more I can't keep my eyes off of her. And she looks very good in black leather! Showing some midriff doesn't hurt either. :-)

    4. Re:Forget about the Special FX... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Xenia Seeburg is great if you want luscious lips, big tits, lots of curves - in short, your high school sexual fantasies.
      Explain why this a bad thing again? :)
    5. Re:Forget about the Special FX... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      She is the *only* reason to watch that show. What a piece of crap.

      Farscape is hit and miss with me. Too touchy-feely too often

      What I really miss was the SciFi show "Brimstone". This one had great potential but they canned it after 1 season.

    6. Re:Forget about the Special FX... by [Xorian] · · Score: 1
      The most important reason to watch Lexx is Xenia Seeburg.

      The love slave? No way! The most important reason to watch Lexx is Kai. That dead man in black is so dreamy!

      (Sorry... I must have been channeling 790 there for a sec.)

      --
      CVS is teh suck. Use Vesta instead.
  18. Re:Sarcasm? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    > The short lived Space Rangers was infinitely
    > better than this drivel

    Sorry, Clayton & Co. went the way of the dodo in my mind at the end of the very first episode when, instead of making the stiff, humorous robot part of the crew, they shoved him in a box.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  19. Re:Red Dwarf by iso_bars · · Score: 1

    Brilliant comment!

    I love Red Dwarf, and have to agree the last few series have been awful in comparison. The are also some excellent older sci-fi, such as The Hitch Hiker's Guide (naturally)

    Star Trek (whatever flavour) isn't bad in my opinion, worth watching if youve got nothing better to do. Although DS9 is awful!

    I personnally couldnt hack Blake 7 or a few of the slightly more naff sci-fi's... but thats me inviting flames!

    Futurama: excellent, worth watching. Farscape isnt bad, and neither is 7 days... but is it just me or do american 'hero' actors with 'attitude' come 2 a penny (cent?) at the moment? Ive got a bit bored with those two recently though.

    Sliders: brilliant but bizzarre... goes a bit star trek-esq and off the plot at times but still quite exciting stuff with sometimes a few interesting ideas!

    Well thats my list, dont know if anyone cares...

  20. Re:Lexx by bill_kress · · Score: 1

    Apparently either nobody watches the current season or these comments are being written outside the US where they are back a season.

    - It happens to so stupidly far in the future

    Isn't quite true at all. It happens today, just, for the most part, in the "Good" universe. Now that they've shifted over to the "Evil" universe, we see a lot more earth.

    That's what I've picked up from the 3 or 4 episodes I've caught this season since they put it on after Farscape.

  21. Re:I can explain it... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    But for some reason mainstream people are not embarassed to watch bad mainstream programms like Baywatch, Viper, Knight Rider, Dukes of Hazard ...

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  22. Re:The simple algorithm to determine good SF/TV by stox · · Score: 1

    Arrr....Make that "The Lathe of Heaven"

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  23. Space 1999 by aleclee · · Score: 1

    Not on TV right now but I'm gonna have to get the DVD sets.

    --
    This message composed using 100% recycled electrons.
  24. Best SciFi on TV? by johndill · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm. I think that Farscape is still hte best thing on. It might have lost a step this year, but the pop-culture references and the clever homage to other ScIFi really makes it worth watching. (Yo! DRD Pike!)

  25. Stargate by jhittner · · Score: 1

    This is the last season of SG-1, and some of the new episodes are really good. It comes on showtime on friday nights at 12

    1. Re:Stargate by Planetes · · Score: 1

      Actually according to the websites (including www.stargate-sg1.com) This may not be the last season.

      --
      Planetes
      "One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promo Ad
      "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitl
    2. Re:Stargate by kperrier · · Score: 1

      I just wish it was on at a reasonable time. If this is the last season, will Sci-Fi be picking it up for syndication?

      Kent

    3. Re:Stargate by jhittner · · Score: 1

      its on fox on saterdays in syndication

    4. Re:Stargate by erpbridge · · Score: 1

      Correction: That should be Richard Dean Anderson.

    5. Re:Stargate by RWC09 · · Score: 1

      The negative attitude is actually from the movie with Kurt Russel. They have just continued writing his character in the same way.

      --
      -->If Linux was written by Bill Gates & Co. - no one would want to switch !!
    6. Re:Stargate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      SG-1 is awesome! Anyhoo, for those who don't get up to date episodes, there's always www.sg1archive.com ;)

    7. Re:Stargate by belg4mit · · Score: 0

      Fox already plays Stargate in syndication. Used to be Sunday @ 12:30, as well as throughtout the day Sunday (like 5 or 6PM) but now it only seesm to be on @ 11 AM. Also Fox is a few seasons behind Showtime...

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    8. Re:Stargate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stargate is on on fridays at 10...EST...im not sure what time zone u r in or if u just mistyped...the also run reruns of earlier seasons on fox on sundays i think but i dont know what time cuz i dont usually watch it when its on fox

    9. Re:Stargate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also is showing on some fox station saturdays around 7 PST and repeated at midnight the same evening on the same channel (FOX 2 in SF/SJ area). I also recommend The Invisible man on SCI-FI channel, funny episodes each week :). G.

    10. Re:Stargate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heard of a wonderful invention called a vcr? tivo? hell an ati radeon is what i use to capture shows i usually sleep through. the tech is out there, GO GET IT!

    11. Re:Stargate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stargate plain sucks with that McGyver dude. He's always making these stupid negative and deragatory remarks like the pompous ass he is. Too bad they can't ship him off to some stargate never to return and at least get someone with better acting skills in there. The show would have at least half a chance with him outta there.

    12. Re:Stargate by stagesmith · · Score: 1

      An interview with Harry Dean Anderson (Lead character Jack O'niel and the exec producer) stated that it was moving to Sci-Fi channel, and this was the last year on Showtime. I don't think they are canceling it, just moving. This also gives Sci-Fi the syndication rights for the old shows. Since they bought Babylon 5/Crusade an the directors cuts of Star Trek, is there any Sci-Fi they won't own soon? I have no complaints except the excessive adds, but if that is what it takes to keep these shows on the air I am willing to deal with it. I wonder if other channels are just avoiding even doing Sci-fi, and just letting the Sci-Fi channel have them. Nobody else, besides Star Trek(Paramoun), has made much profit on Sci-Fi TV as a genre.

      --
      "Degustibus Nondisputondum Est" (There can be no arguments in matters of taste. Latin)
  26. A list from a different perspective.... by The+Rizz · · Score: 1
    I hate to say it, but I really don't think most of what was on your list are very good episodes. Most of them suffer heavily from the "alien of the week" syndrome that plagues so many sci-fi shows. Personally, I have always preferred episodes that move the plot along, rather than ones that are just there to entertain for an hour and then be forgotten. My top 10 would be:
    • There But For The Grace Of God (1.19) - Very nice parallel universe episode, leading right into the season finale...
    • Within The Serpent's Grasp / Serpent's Lair (1.21/2.01) - Excellent two-parter. Firefights. Nuclear weapons. Space ships. Stuff explodes.
    • Thor's Chariot (2.06) - Going back and fixing something they screwed up in season 1.
    • Secrets (2.09) - Political intrigue. Good stuff.
    • Into The Fire (3.01) - Pretty much just an all-around good episode. "Threading the needle" ... heh.
    • Jolinar's Memories / The Devil You Know (3.12/3.13) - How many TV shows actually send their main characters to Hell on a rescue mission? (...and not have it suck, that is...)
    • A Hundred Days (3.17) - Nice story. Not a major plot episode, but very well written.
    • Nemesis (3.22) - Have you played Half Life? Can we say "head crabs"?
    • The Serpent's Venom (4.14) - Playing in a minefield with my favorite snake-in-the-head.
    • Exodus (4.22) - Farscape destroyed a planet in one of their season finales? I guess we'll need to one-up that...
  27. Re:Red Dwarf by dorward · · Score: 1

    We can look forward to a new season? Amazing! Here I was thinking that all we had to look forward to was the film next summer (which doesn't resolve RD8's cliffhanger).

    Where's the evidence then?

  28. Re:I can explain it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They aren't afraid to admit watching The West Wing. Tee hee

  29. Re:Some SciFi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Worth programming the VCR for;

    "What is this VCR thing of which you speak?" asked the happy TiVo owner.

  30. Re:Lexx and Stargate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't comment on stargate... the original lexx was bad. i couldn't believe they crammed in that much bad sf into 2 hours. but they did...

  31. Re:define scifi by nixxy · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't call them SciFi, but they are good shows

    My fave sci-fi shows would have to be ST: Voyager Farscape, Quantum leap, Time Trax (probably doesn't fit), ST: DS9, SG-1 and ofcourse older episodes of X-Files.

    Unfortunately I haven't seen quantum leap inabout 8 years and farscape hasn't been put back on this year (bastards)

    --
    ------------
    "There is a thin line between genius and insanity and I can't walk straight"
  32. Re:Voyager was great! by Trekologer · · Score: 1

    The feeling I always got when watching Voyager was: tired.

    Same here. At one time, I was a HUGE Trek fan (take a look ay my username!), but both DS9 and Voyager lost my intrest. DS9 became hard to follow when the eppisodes became very sequential. The best thing about TNG was that you can, more or less, watch the eppisodes in any order and not get lost in references to past eppisodes. When you can't watch the show each week (and forget to tape it), its very hard to watch.

    Voyager... How many times did Janeway loose the ship to some alien who threw them off and took control? Using that theme once is fine, but it was rehashed over and over again. I was hoping that they'd get home around the middle of the series and stop the "lost in space" storyline.

  33. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by Buran · · Score: 1

    Actually, it was filmed in letterbox originally with the intention of eventually using the letterboxed version on digital TV, which uses an aspect ratio like that of movie screens (about 16:9) rather than the current 4:3 ratio. But until the Sci-Fi Channel started airing the show, we only saw the pan-and-scan version.

  34. Slightly off topic... by X!0mbarg · · Score: 1

    Has anyone ever seen or heard of a little known PBS (Canada) show entitled "Prisoners of Gravity"? It starred "Commander Rick" (Rick Green of The Frantics), who did taped, Devil's advocate-type interviews with Big name artists and authors about all kinds of SF&F topics. If it was still on the air (at last awareness, it has slipped into commercial laden syndication,) it might still be covering the latest and greatest (or even the Dogs, life Cleopatra 2525), with a certain air of authority, as asnwers to the occasional tough queston came Driectly from the author/artists/muses' mouth! Oh, for the original, commercial-free 27 minute shows!

  35. Re:disk space? by haplo21112 · · Score: 2

    Hook the tivo up to a EMC Cellera Media Server Box, the Ultimate hack!

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  36. Farscape by Kostya · · Score: 2

    Scifi Channel, Friday's at 9:00p and 12:00a.

    --
    "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
  37. Re:I love Sci FI, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's tough being a geek! Long live Lexx. Zev

  38. Re:I like Lexx. A lot. by philipm · · Score: 0

    Brigadoon was actually my favorite episode. I really like the singing, but then again I've always been a big fan of warrior-poets. assasin-poets are even better!

    I pretty much like anything with asassins and thieves.

  39. Re:Stargate SG-1 by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    You didn't specify if you're having problems accessing information about the current season, or earlier ones.

    There is extremely little information available about episodes until after they air. Even after they air the synopsis and screen shots might not appear for some time. If you're not seeing information about the current season, it's probably because they haven't release it yet, not because of your location.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  40. ST:TNG by NeoTomba · · Score: 1
    Where I am, the local UPN affiliate shows Star Trek: The NExt Generation every day at 6PM and then again at 10PM.

    Not current, but still one of the best damn shows on television. Plus, they're showing the series in order, and the 6PM run recently started from the beginning. The first season is great (and Riker has no beard!)

    -NeoTomba

    1. Re:ST:TNG by Twelvemotionjs · · Score: 1

      I thought Riker was a more convincing XO with a beard, w/o it he looked like some loser lady's man. The first two seasons of ST:TNG were wholly different (visually and in tone) from seasons 3-7, and are slightly more reminescent of the original Star Trek. Check out those early ST:TNG episodes if you haven't seen 'em.

    2. Re:ST:TNG by CMiYC · · Score: 2

      I have to disagree with you. I really didn't like the first season very much. The second season would have been alright if Pulaski died or something. I can't believe how bad that woman could act. I think they used her in the show just because they knew nobody would want her to stay once Crusher came back. Starting with the 3rd season, I think ST:TNG really took off. The characters had really developed and the writing was great. Not that all the episodes were good, but the good ones were good. My biggest issue with Voyager is the writing sucks. Nevermind the shitty computer generated special effects. You can predict the end within the first 5 minutes. And the characters were really shallow up to the last season. Granted on ST:TNG you knew Picard wasn't _REALLY_ going to die, but you weren't sure how he was going to be saved.

      Anyway I'm ranting.

    3. Re:ST:TNG by dasheiff · · Score: 1
      Granted on ST:TNG you knew Picard wasn't REALLY_ going to die, but you weren't sure how he was going to be saved.

      Well except at the end of the third season when he was captured by the Borg and Patrick Stuart was renegotating his contract.

  41. Re:FIRSTWAVE by Fishd · · Score: 1

    First Wave original? Good? Maybe. But original? No. Ever heard of the 1960s series "Invaders" ? Featured a guy wandering round the US of A trying to convince people of alien invaders who looked just like humans but when you killed them they dissolved, sounding familiar now? All First Wave added was a cute ex-porn star (gotta admit, her acting is getting a lot better), a hacker (hey, it's the new millennium) and some weird prophecies written hundreds of years ago.

  42. Re:Bad SciFi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space: Above and Beyond? I love that show :) -- Adam Lydick Wandering Programmer

  43. Re:10pm, you're getting wrong feed by Ssolstice · · Score: 1

    Why should I complain. I get it at 9 PM and again at midnight. Wouldn't getting something twice be a GOOD thing? If I miss the first one, I can catch it again...

  44. Re:B5 was king, what happend?!? by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

    You mean Crusade? Killed before it had a chance to prove itself. I read the scripts of the last two eps that were available on the former Bookface.com. Unbelieveable - where that show could have gone if given the chance... Sci-Fi only bought the 13 eps that were completed and aired on TNT. As for the CGI equipment, I believe Netter Digital auctioned them all online a year or two ago. Of course this means the new production company for B5: Legend of the Rangers had to buy all new equipment (drools at the thought).

  45. Re:define scifi by suzander · · Score: 1

    Regardless of how it's defined, Buffy is one of the best shows on TV. Angel is good, too.

  46. Re:Ahem.. Blake's 7? by KI0PX · · Score: 2, Informative
    Amen! Considering how it was such a low-budget production, Blake's 7 was really good. It had some similarities to Star Trek, I thought. The Federation symbol was much like a sideways communicator, teleporter==transporter, etc. I think a lot of the episode names were the same too.

    And major characters would often die, making it more realistic.

    Not to mention the last episode, where they simply killed off all the remaining characters (excepting Blake himself... they just faded out right after he had been captured). Not many shows have the guts to do that.

  47. Re:Red Dwarf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gimmie Red Dwarf anytime , My American relatives are mad about it when they come over to Ireland and watch it on VCR -as you say - the episodes 1-6 are fine but it went downhill from Kolchanski on

  48. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by porges · · Score: 0, Troll

    Your second sentence: it would be desirable to "get over this border crap between countries and learn to live as one race".

    Your first sentence: if you disagree with my taste in TV, you're an idiot.

    Gosh, I wonder if there's any tension between those two points of view.

  49. Re:Red Dwarf by cybergeek · · Score: 1
    I don't think there's been anything official about a new TV series. The impression I got was that if the film is a success, a new series could be in the pipeline.

    Daniel Judas Bolger

    (posted in accordance with Space Corps Directive 34124)

  50. Dredd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, Let me guess, you never actually read the comics right? Dredd was abysmal, it sucked on so many levels I can't even begin to decribe them all, but a few of the "main" ones are as follows: Humour, this is Dredd we're talking about here, the fascist anti hero, who kicks the crap out of everyone becuase, he is "the law" it's black humour at it's best, it doesn't need "comic relief" and certainly not from a dick that the real Dredd would have assulted, incarecated or worse. Love interest... This is Dredd, the man who goes into the bathroom with a gun and a law book, he's not even house broken, so how the hell he manages to get involved witha female of the species is beyond me. The helmet. He takes it off, Dredd has never taken off his helmet, ever. The only time you ever get to see his face is after reading "the dead man" for perhaps 20 episodes, then it dawn's on you that the "dead man" is actually Dredd, but since he's got third degree burns to 95% of his body you can't tell what he looks like anyway. The tech, the redesigned it, Lawmasters don't fly, never have, never will. The lawgiver has a dial on it, and takes cartidges from three places, the grip, and above and below the barrell. I could go on, but I've got a feeling I'm wasting my time... later jb praxis22@hotmail.com

  51. Babylon 5 for reruns, and a few other goods ones by Nexis · · Score: 1

    Well Babylon 5 is definitely the best of the scifi and is doing reruns on the sci-fi channel (but you really should catch it starting at the first episode since the stories follow and arc). There's also a new Rangers series coming out next year with a movie coming out near the end of this summer I think. Something definitely to check out.

    Other good shows to check out would be Stargate-SG1 and Earth: Final Conflict (it's gone downhill for awhile, but it still good compared to the other crap out there).

    Farscape is decent as a show and probably sci-fi channels best original series. I just hate Lexx myself (maybe if you like a "comedy" type scifi show that it's so bad you can laugh at it you'll like it).

    Andromeda is a questionable show and I'm still unsure about recommending it. Most of the episodes have been rather bad but it has some good ones here and there. Hopefully it'll turn into an ok show.

  52. Re:SciFi Channel Dune was Great by ncstockguy · · Score: 1

    Dune on SciFi was probably the best SciFi to be had anywhere lately. Hopefully more will be coming.

  53. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Ereth · · Score: 2

    Try the other site then, http://www.stargate-sg1.com. Depending on where the hyphen is, you get the Showtime site, or the MGM site, which deals with the syndicated version (ie, the shows from last year that are run on Fox or wherever). I was always amused that they have two separate web sites so fans who don't get Showtime don't end up with spoilers.

  54. Re:Does nobody but me like Dark Angel? by McSpew · · Score: 2

    By the way, your comments reminded me of one of the things I absolutely love about most Cameron stories: The characters see all the same obvious shit we do.

    In Aliens, the characters don't do the typical moron horror-movie character stuff (i.e., "Hey, let's stay here on this horrible planet and let the nasty monsters plant larvae in our chests!"). They decide the smart thing to do is get the hell off the planet and nuke it from orbit. Cameron's genius is in preventing them from doing so in a believable way.

    Likewise, the characters in Dark Angel see the same obvious shit we do and actually try to take the easy way out whenever possible. Cameron finds credible ways to keep them from doing so. He also complicates their lives in creative ways that seem to flow naturally from the characters' motivations, rather than from the demands of this week's "A very special Dark Angel" or whatever.

    The characters are as simultaneously cynical and idealistic as most of us. I like that a lot.

    Oh, and have I mentioned that Jessica Alba's luscious?

  55. Re:Since you didn't specify NEW Sci-Fi by spanky555 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, even with having Tivo set to Season Pass on Doctor Who results in rather sporadic viewing of Doctor Who where I'm at(Denver Metro area). Some weeks, they show 2 parts (out of the usual 4), and then other weeks they don't show any at all, or REPEAT the same 2 parts from the week before. Weird. Where I grew up at (Central PA), it was like clockwork during my high school years. Always the same time, same day, and they showed all four parts together...unless they were doing a fund raising marathon, in which case they would split the show in two, and beg in between for about a half an hour.

  56. HHGTG, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On BBC2 this week. V. Good.

    [zippy-the-pinhead]

  57. Bad SciFi? by humming · · Score: 1

    I can't remember I've seen a really bad SciFi show in a long time. But perhaps I'm just glad that I can watch some SciFi other than Star Trek that makes me pretty happy.

    Living in Sweden, we are a couple of seasons (atleast) back in most of the shows, and I gather most shows doesn't show up here at all.

    Best SciFi show ever must have been Babylon 5, but I gather there will be hundreds of other fan posts explaining to Star Trek buffs why B5 is a better show. (Two words; character development)

    I enjoy Farscape, although I've only seen the second season. It's the best show which are still running currently. Lexx is another great show, if one can get past the cheezy effects and acting. There are great humour there though.

    Recent shows that has stopped running but are still pretty good, imho, are; Earth 2 and Space and Beyond (I _know_. Noone liked that show)

    I hope someone mentions 'V' too. Just out on DVD people! :)
    Knight Rider must be classified as SciFi too. ;)

    --
    I'm too stupid to preview.
    1. Re:Bad SciFi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People didn't like Space above and beyond?! That show rocked.

  58. Lexx by vortigern00 · · Score: 1

    You have to watch the first few episodes of Lexx -- they are many times better than the later series.

    If you have trouble finding the first episodes, you might try looking under its US name "Tales from a Parallel Universe."

    The old Lexx was truly amazing. The actress who played Zev in the first episodes was breathtaking, and the stories were both disturbing and exciting.

    1. Re:Lexx by Ozwald · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think the credits mention a joint venture between Canada and Germany. Not sure where it is filmed but I believe I heard it was done in Nova Scotia. Since the last episode ended on a beach and Nova Scotia is surrounded by beach,...

      But I love this show for three reasons:
      - Eva Habermann is hot. Too bad she was only on for half/dozen shows.
      - It isn't politically correct. It isn't afraid to affend anyone. Compare this to Voyager which was I think was annoyingly politically correct. But then again, I wouldn't recommend it to my parents...
      - It's by far got the most original concepts and ideas out there. I don't know of any other show where the humans fly around in a giant bug in one of two universes. Compare this to Roddenberry shows which all seem the same.

      Ozwald

    2. Re:Lexx by Pope · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lexx is a co-production between Canada and Germany. A lot of the FX for the show are done right here in Toronto by CORE Digital. I got to see a Lexx on their internal reel 3 months before it hit the air. :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Lexx by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

      // I think the credits mention a joint venture
      // between Canada and Germany. Not sure where it
      // is filmed but I believe I heard it was done in
      // Nova Scotia. Since the last episode ended on a
      // beach and Nova Scotia is surrounded by
      // beach,...

      Yeah, the Canadian input for Lexx is by Salter Street Films, and if memory serves me most if not all of the first two seasons and I believe the forthcoming fourth season have all been filmed right here in Halifax NS. Of course, that scene your thinking of was at the tail end of the third season which was filmed in Germany. :'>

      Season 4 starts playing in I believe a few weeks (up here at least, though if history is repeated it may take an extra six months to show up south of the border) but it'll still be a few months before the fourth season is finished to the end. And of course my brother has read through the season long synopsis so knows everything planned, but he aint talking *grrrr*

    4. Re:Lexx by anticypher · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even though I don't own a tele, I've seen a large number of Lexx shows. A friend works on the German side of things, and they fly him to Toronto and some studio in the wilds of Nova Scotia (his words) from time to time. Much of the talent in front of the camera is Canadian, with the exception of Eva & Xenia. Behind the camera is a mix of Germans and Canucks. Most of the young, sexy bit-part actresses are German.

      Since I spend wayyyyy too much time in hotel rooms, I do get to see Lexx on both sides of the atlantic. There are two different versions, the European/Canadian shows tend to be more sexy and edgy, the U.S. gets a very edited down version so the Sci-Fi channel doesn't get kicked from too many cable stations as pr0n.

      When my friend first told me of Lexx, it was being sold to various investment groups and production support companies as a way to attract a large number of hard-core geeks. By analyzing the only successful elements of recent trek shows [7of9], the first season working title was Sexx. The mini-capsule was "Trek meets Xena in a Blue Velvet universe". With a tag like that, its not hard to see why CmdrTaco likes Lexx, as well as Farscape.

      I like Lexx, but I wish all four seasons would come out on DVD or tape, or some fan would digitize every episode into mpeg and share them on gnutella.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  59. Re:Voyager was great! by mpe · · Score: 2

    DS9 became hard to follow when the eppisodes became very sequential.

    This must be a big problem for viewers in the US. Considering the completly non serial way that series tend to be scheduled there.

  60. Best scifi I'm watching is old scifi by Enormous+Cow+Turd · · Score: 1

    A&E is releasing sets of DVDs comprising all the episodes of three ITC classics: Space 1999, The Prisoner, and The Thunderbirds. The Prisoner: Can this be labeled scifi? I think so. It had those white bubble thingys, right (what were they)? Kinda James Bondish but man this was a great show. The Thunderbirds: Marionettes with an attitude. The models in this show were so detailed you had to be impressed. Space 1999: One of my all time favourites. I actually think this show had more atmosphere than Star Trek. Moon Base Alpha was just such a dark and forboding place. The stories had none of the cheerfulness of the Trek shows. The cast was great (Martin Landau, Barbara Bain, Barry Morse), the effects were pretty good for the day, and some of the stories were outstanding. Check it out if you were too young to catch it the first time around. All sets contain two DVDs. Each Prisoner boxed set seem to contain around 4 epsiodes, while the Space 1999 and Thunderbirds contain 6 episodes per set.

  61. re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Trek: TNG is (was?) the best sci fi on Tv for a long time. I also rate Red Dwarf and Farscape. BTW Anyone remember the very cheesy episodes of Hitchhikers Guide...?

  62. define scifi by SonofRage · · Score: 1

    Well, depending on how you want to define SciFi, you can make the argument for Buffy the Vampire Slayer being the best SciFi show on tv right now.

    1. Re:define scifi by tmhsiao · · Score: 1
      But I would go so far as to define Buffy as more of a drama than sci-fi, mainly due to all of the paranormal involved in the show simply being metaphorical to whats happening in the characters' lives.
      Buffy pretty much lost all of its metaphoric subtlety with the titular character's entrance into college. We lost "High School is Hell" and gained "College is where poorly-organized commandoes help you fight Hell."
      --
      "My God...It's full of ads!" -Fry, about the Internet, Futurama
    2. Re:define scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to define "best" very creatively to make an argument for Buffy the Vampire Slayer being the best anything.

    3. Re:define scifi by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      The 80s were a different universe.

    4. Re:define scifi by inversesinewave · · Score: 1

      definitely. But I would go so far as to define Buffy as more of a drama than sci-fi, mainly due to all of the paranormal involved in the show simply being metaphorical to whats happening in the characters' lives. Buffy/Angel are the only shows on TV that I watch.

    5. Re:define scifi by annenk38 · · Score: 1

      Sci-fi is by and large a misnomer. There's far more surrealism in shows commonly considered "sci-fi" than anything else. Rod Serling is probably the greatest creator of sci-fi on television, but you can hardly call it "science fiction". Now, if there's any show that imitates Twilight Zone the best -- it's The Outer Limits.

    6. Re:define scifi by unitron · · Score: 2

      The Outer Limits imitates the original Outer Limits, and since I was around for that it's usually painfully obvious to me in the first five or ten minutes where an Outer Limits episode is going. Not always, but most of the time. This doesn't mean that the original and/or current versions aren't good shows, but Twilight Zone remains in a class by itself.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    7. Re:define scifi by Bugmaster · · Score: 1

      I agree, the new Outer Limits is painfully obvious. It also seems to wield The Moral (tm) of the story like a 2x4. Do you get the moral yet ? *SMACK* How about now ? *SMACK*. It's annoying. The original Outer Limits was much more subtle, and thus a much better show.

      --
      >|<*:=
  63. Re:West Wing by mcj · · Score: 1

    Indeed. I think the HBO series "Six Feet Under" is brilliant (though not at all sci-fi).

    Seeing what they do to bodies has convinced me to go with cremation.

  64. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by amblin · · Score: 1

    Ahhh...
    I remember those days. I put up a huge antena and signal amp. to pick that up way down in SC.

  65. Good vs. Evil (aka G vs E) by JonMartin · · Score: 1

    Say you sell your soul to the Devil (for, let's say, a lifetime supply of foo). Next thing you know two guys show up at your door to convince you to call off the deal (the catch is you have to give up your lifetime supply of foo). Should they fail to convince you, they have orders to kill you.

    And they're the good guys.

    It's on Space here in Canada (late Sunday), and is quite clever.
    IMDB: http://us.imdb.com/Title?0195462

    --
    Serve Gonk.
  66. Re:Tv Media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny how everyone's been joking about putting spammers behind bars for years, and now when one has been (after all, that's what poor little Dmitry is), and is now taking it up the ass in jail, you script kiddies are crying your little eyes out.

  67. Lexx and Stargate by Kanon · · Score: 1

    I'm a big fan of Lexx and Stargate SG1. I can't wait for season 4 of Lexx where they encounter Earth of our time :)

    1. Re:Lexx and Stargate by spanky555 · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for season 4 of Lexx where they encounter Earth of our time
      ??? Aren't they running that right now on Sci-fi channel? Or are you talking about the DVD release?

    2. Re:Lexx and Stargate by jmauro · · Score: 1

      You're not that big of a fan then, since season 4 started broadcasting in the US markets 3 weeks ago.

    3. Re:Lexx and Stargate by Kanon · · Score: 1

      Not in the UK they aren't. Why on earth do some people assume everyone is American?

    4. Re:Lexx and Stargate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already blew up Orlando, and the Lexx almost ate Holland.

  68. Re:Ahem.. Blake's 7? by FatOldGoth · · Score: 2

    Not to mention the last episode, where they simply killed off all the remaining characters (excepting Blake himself... they just faded out right after he had been captured). Not many shows have the guts to do that.

    I think you mean Avon. We got to see Blake killed.

    --

    I would be a paid subscriber if Taco and Hemos weren't such cunts
  69. Quantum Leap and The Chronicle by Rydor · · Score: 1

    The first, Quantum Leap is my all time favorite Sci-Fi show ever. It's got a great concept, and some really funny parts (like when he leaps as an old lady) It's on Sci-Fi every weekday in syndication at 4o'clock EST, maybe 3 o'clock too. The latter, Chronicle, is a new series on Sci-Fi that is sort of Men in Black meets the Sun (a yucky tabloid) but to top it all off, this tabloid is true. It's hilarious and has some really funny twists. It's on Saturdays at 9 EST.

  70. Re:What about Buffy and Friends? by SonofRage · · Score: 1

    I meant 20 minutes before the other posting mentioning Buffy. my bad

  71. Re:Lexx ??? by hawk · · Score: 2
    At least that sounds better than the quite literal computer sex on the one I forced myself to watch to the end . . . :)


    hawk

  72. Re:I'm coming out: I watch Andromeda by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    I prefer to think that, rather than collagen, they're using the more natural ass-fat injections.

    Then I can fantasize about kissing their huge lips and ass at the same time.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  73. Re:Babylon 5 by ltning · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry you take it this way. And I'm sorry if my post made it look like the only thing I'm doing is to bash Trekies.
    My reason for doing so is that the most common source of critics agains B5 comes from trekies, and thus it's natural for me to compare to that. I know I shouldn't. And I know, people posting here have been mostly kind to B5.. However, the major reason for this is probably that B5 wasn't mentioned in the original story! Such things tend to have some effect on the following discussion..

    Anyway.. I watch ST myself, but as I said in my original post, mostly for entertainment purposes. As far as that goes, it's among the best things around. Partly because it's sci-fi, and partly because it's hitech stuff. And I'm a geek ;)

    And why don't I mention/bash/criticize/compliment other series? Because from what I've seen (which admittedly is rather limited due to my location and so on) there are no other sci-fi series worth mentioning. B5 and ST are the top-notch, each in their own genre, but complementing eachother quite well as far as brainfood and entertainment needs are concerned.

    --
    Love over Gold.
  74. Bonanza/Wagon Train/Outer Limits by SimCash · · Score: 1
    1. Bonanza = take stock characters and bring challenges to them in a familiar setting (DS9)
    2. Wagon Train = take stock characters and move them to new challenges in new settings (ST, STNG, Voyager)
    3. Outer Limits = new characters and challenges each episode
    Even my Aunt Sadie can get into (1) and (2) because she can focus on the hunks and TnAs, never mind the plots (gee, will anyone ever bed Spock???). (3) requires much more love of ideas and concepts, and is a much tougher sell. However, done right, it is an incredible art and some of the best SciFi being pushed through the pipe.

    [flameshields status=up]

  75. Don't Panic by bartjan · · Score: 1

    The Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy , which is broadcasted by the BBC these weeks :)

    1. Re:Don't Panic by lunatik17 · · Score: 1

      You lucky bastard.

      --

      Here's my DeCSS mirror, where's yours?

    2. Re:Don't Panic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Would you please record them, sample them and put on Gnutella...

      That should earn the he geek culture achievement medal of the year.

    3. Re:Don't Panic by bartjan · · Score: 1

      Could do that, but I did not record the first 3 episodes. However, I do have the radioseries on mp3 (and the episode in 5 parts on paper).

  76. Re:Red Dwarf by Nick+Number · · Score: 1

    And it doesn't preach. Rodenberry infected all US TV SF (acronyms, ya gotta love 'em) with the disease of sanctimonious preaching. Even B5, by far the best of the bunch, suffers from this.

    Kryten: Could this be the emotion you humans call...friendship?

    Lister: Don't give me that Star Trek crap, it's too early in the morning!

    --
    Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
  77. Futurama by floppy+ears · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Futurama is the best SF on tv today. Since it's a cartoon, they can do absolutely anything. Plus, aside from The Simpsons, it's probably the funniest show on the air. Sure, it's not pure SF, but they routinely address topics that the lamer SF shows are afraid to touch.

    --

    "If I could live to be several hundred
    I could take a walk and really wander, really wonder."
    1. Re:Futurama by Saurentine · · Score: 1
      Futurama is the best SF on tv today. Since it's a cartoon, they can do absolutely anything. Plus, aside from The Simpsons, it's probably the funniest show on the air. Sure, it's not pure SF, but they routinely address topics that the lamer SF shows are afraid to touch.

      Any Science Fiction show that can find a coherent way to refer to a space-time problem as an "Intergalactic Wang-Dang Doodle" is pretty much the pinnacle of Science Fiction programming.

      "Intergalactic Wang-Dang Doodle" makes about as much sense as the technobabble in the average Star Trek episode, and it's a thousand times more fun to say out loud.

      Plus, when you say "Intergalactic Wang-Dang Doodle" in public instead of quoting some Star Trek technobabble, people just assume you're infinitely more hip than they are instead of ridiculing you as a total geek. (Well, maybe not...)

      Futurama is the greatest show on television.

  78. Re:Voyager was great! by psykocrime · · Score: 1

    Voyager was a great show. Not quite as good as Doctor Who, but it was damn good.

    I really hate that Voyager ended. That show had at least 3 or 4 more good seasons left in it, damnit!

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  79. CSI by nuhonda · · Score: 0

    while not really sci-fi, i gotta say i really dig CSI. sure it's a little cheesey, but for once, they made a show that has some real science in it.

    --
    (pretend there's something witty here)
  80. lucky bastard by BassGuy23 · · Score: 0

    TNG used to be on our NBC affiliate every day at 4PM. That rocked. It was in order, and on a strong signal. About 3 years ago, they inexplicably dropped it from their lineup, and there was no TNG here for a long time. Now, TNG is on at 6 PM here, on our WB affiliate, but the signal is so weak, the cable company (AT&T) can't pick it up too well. Compound that with the fact that I'm usually at work and the VCR picture quality is nearly unwatchable from that chennel (our cable really blows). Satellite's not an option (no southern sky) and the cable company's got a monoppoly here. And we're too far from town to pick up any stations well. It's very frustrating. I'm just holding out for the DVD's.

    --

    ~Mike

    A big enough hammer fixes *anything*
  81. Re:The Invisible Man by hyperizer · · Score: 1

    MST3K on Sci-Fi suffered the same problem as MST3K on Comedy Central: Mike didn't have quite the strength as Joel. I didn't mourn all that much over its loss.

    This is debatable--in fact it was debated for years through a vicious MSTie flamewar. I'll agree, though, that the writing went downhill after Frank Conniff Jr. and Trace Beaulieu left. The last few seasons there were a lot fewer jokes and most of them were low-brow. Still, it remained a funny show. I have no idea what the ratings were like...

  82. Lexx ??? by hawk · · Score: 2
    This has to be the most bizarre thing I've ever seen on television. No, not the contents itself, but the very concept: A parody of bad british sf? ???


    for crying out loud, that stuff is its *own* parody . . .


    :)
    hawk

    1. Re:Lexx ??? by steveha · · Score: 2
      I have only watched one complete episode of Lexx. It was bad. Very bad.

      The only scene I liked: the gorgeous chick was having dinner with a guy. She liked him and thought he was good looking, but he was only interested in her because she was holding the key to Lexx. He wanted her to give control of Lexx over to him, since it is such an amazing powerful yada yada whatever.

      Guy: Together we can conquer the universe! Whole star systems will tremble before us! Absolute power!
      Chick: Can't we just have sex instead?

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  83. Seasons 5 and 6 by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    Although there were some very good episodes in season 5 [most importantly, Back to Reality (He committed suicide; he committed suicide; he committed suicide, and the _fish_ committed suicide. There's some kind of link here I can't quite make out), one of the greatest episodes, right up there with White Hole (Would you like some toast?), Timeslides (Unpack Rachel and get out the puncture repair kit!), Stasis Leak (Nevermind. It's the personality that counts), and Polymorph (I think we're all beginning to lose sight of the real issue here, which is: what are we going to call ourselves?)], and Holoship (You make love like a Japanese meal: small portions, but _so_ many courses.)

    Season 6 just didn't stand up to the others. Psirens (You heard 'em -- they want seed-spreaders. I'm going to apply. You guys deal with this Psiren thing. I'll deal with this.) was decent, but then you have stuff like Emohawk which was just a lame reason to bring back Ace Rimmer and Dwane Dibley. It was funnier the first time in Polymorph.

    Seasons 5 and 6 also marked the move from pure sit com to a little more action oriented, which helps to keep the show from getting stale, but I loved the slapstick stuff. The shows don't seem to flow quite as well anymore, as for a point, they were getting to be a reason to string together a bunch of one liners. However, even a bad episode of Red Dwarf is better than most of the 'good' shows on american TV these days.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Seasons 5 and 6 by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      yeah, I think we'll have to agree to disagree, series 6 was the best in my opinion.

      But your right about the bad episodes being watchable, I saw an episode from series 7 recently (the one with the virus and lister has to amputate his arm) and that was quite funny.

      Virus (to kryten): hey give that man an eyebrow, wait I'm feeling generous, give him two

  84. Re:Lexx Rip off - If anything of Douglas Adams. by Philipv1 · · Score: 1

    Which is a *good* thing. LEXX is about as close as you can get to seeing a Douglas Adams TV show IMO, but with a bit more erotica weirdness thrown in for good measure. It is nothing like Red Dwarf at all, dunno what the original poster was smokin'...

  85. Re:Babylon 5 by DoomHaven · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hear, hear! Damned right! B5 is the best Sci-Fi TV ever. It is a series that can be watched from end to end several times in a row (all 110 episodes) and you will *still* catch something new, or understand some obscure bit of foreshadowing that originally you missed. I have seen the series several times over, and I still find myself finding new gems. The continuity of the series is great; my biggest pet peeve of ST:NG (my second favourite SF TV show) was how the events of the episode would only affect the crew for *that* episode, and would never affect them afterward.

    As well, it is a very believable sci-fi series. The humans are not the most powerful race in existence. The future is dirty, dingle, and jerry-rigged; not some utopian paradise. The science is believable: Star Furies act as how spacecraft *should* act. And I love the space battles; just the little details like the space debris keeping the inertia, the way streams of pulse cannon fire missing missing hitting missing targets.

    B5 is the premiere science fiction series. If you haven't watched it, and want to know how good it is without knowing anything of the story line, I would suggest watching "In The Beginning", the made-for-cable movie that relates the events of the Earth-Minbari war.

    --
    "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
  86. Earth: Final Conflict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EFC is a great sci-fi show IMO (this is all opinions though, heh). There is a little bit for everyone, from political intrigue to romance. It's going into its fifth session now. They've definately invested quite a bit into their web presence, having several different websites written from the perspective of various characters in the show.

  87. Buffy and Angel by Life+Blood · · Score: 1

    Dunno about the writing and acting, I would not define them as the "best on TV" although they have done very well at dealing with some really serious topics like the death of Buffy's Mom. The only problem is that they really failed to capitalize on some of this stuff. I mean where is the supernatural baddie that tries to capitalize on this grief or cut a deal with buffy to bring her Mom back? That could have been worked into the overarching plotline so much better.

    In the end Buffy is a show without internal conflict, the gang fights evil and does the right thing. Sure Giles suffocates the villian, but it "had to be done". On the otherhand Angel is dripping with internal conflict. Damn near all the characters have some major failings in their past or major either/or tensions. Sometime you just don't know what they are going to do. Would Buffy have let two vampires feast on a room full of blackhearted lawyers? I think not.

    --

    So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

  88. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Polo · · Score: 2


    I also think the special effects and/or props are done really well. Maybe I don't see the holes in them, but they always seem to be "just right". They never seem to have a "cheap" feel to them and aren't overdone. I think their subtlety adds a quality feel to the show that the other hollywood heavy-handed sci-fi shows overshoot.

    Other shows seem to lose their engrossing quality to me because things always are overdone. When it comes to alien beings, do they always have to look the Zergs in StarCraft? It seems easier to view an alien planet that has trees to me than an alien planet with cheap props. (unless the trees are from "just outside L.A." locations - they won't cut it)

    Maybe better effects are really well done to the point of being invisible. I heard that forest gump had more digital effect footage than jurassic park. You get more engrossed.

    By the way, it comes in great on Dish Network. But I'll bet it looks really good on their showtime HDT channel, but they don't have a PVR for that yet... :-(

  89. My sci-fi viewing has gone down quite a bit. by Almohada · · Score: 1

    The only show I'd consider truly sci-fi at this point that I watch and enjoy is "Andromeda." I expected it to turn out as "wonderfully" as "Earth Final Conflict" so my expectations were really low, but it turned out to be quite a gem. The community off of the official site on the boards is devoted and the information they make available is of fansite calibur in information and quality.

    There are rumors of them fleshing out Trance's character and a few others so they are a bit less two dimentional. I am eagerly anticipating the next season to see how they get out of the mess they left the season finale's cliffhanger with. How they resolve this will be a good key as to how much longer I keep watching.

    Things that are "sort of" sci-fi that I tend to watch include "Buffy The Vampire Slayer," "Angel," "Roswell," "Stargate SG-1," and TNT's "Witchblade." The latter is slowly shaping up to be slightly better than what it started out as, which is good because I think it has the potential to be a great series (much like ST:TNG and its' rocky first season).

    I stopped watching "The X-Files" in the fourth season because it just went too far downhill for me to enjoy anymore. I miss Space: Above and Beyond that Morgan and Wong (X-Files alums) and wish it had been given more of a chance.

    I'm also cheesed Fox axed "The Lone Gunmen." I enjoyed that show quite a bit, as TLG were always my favorite X-Files side characters.

    The classics that are still around that I watch are ST:TNG, ST:TOS, and Dr. Who.

    On the plus side, a lot of Sci-Fi/Fantasy movies appear to be coming out soon like the tenth Trek movie, Red Dwarf, and Lord of the Rings.

    1. Re:My sci-fi viewing has gone down quite a bit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too am ticked off that TLG is cancelled. Sure it was a spoof, but some of the sci-fi elements weren't bad, almost believable by contemporary standards. No wormhole, time travel anomaly etc...cliches. Didn't care too much for the dumb jock character, one show was enough for him. I guess the writers thought the show needed more contrast, or balance. Too bad it didn't have more time to develop.

  90. Go Space! by Pope · · Score: 1
    As for Farscape, Space up here in Canada is airing that this fall

    Whoa! Above I wanted to rip YTV a new one for moving and then killing Farscape this past season. Now I can see it from the start. Thanks for the great news.

    And it is more than Muppets in Space: there'a a wicked sense of humour about it.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  91. Re:Invader Zim! by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1
    But fortunately, there's a slew of eps coming up real soon now. I've got to say, I'm a big fan of Zim. Just wish it were on broadcast TV, since I'll be damned if I spring for cable or satellite. (I can count the different things I watch or would be interested in watching on one hand)

    We're working with some highly unstable chemicals and- No! You've got the mixture all wrong! [BOOM]

    The ice-cream truck was also neat.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  92. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Polo · · Score: 2

    s/HDT/HDTV/

  93. I'm coming out: I watch Andromeda by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a science fiction snob, I should never ever watch this show, let alone admit it, but the only episodic television show I watch is Andromeda. Even worse, it's pretty much just because Lexa Doig is so hot. (For those who don't know, she plays the avatar of a massively powerful warship, so she's not even playing someone real, and yet that's part of the appeal. Psychoanalyze me now!)

    I'm going to science fiction hell for sure.

    For non-episodic science fiction shorts, I try to check out Exposure . It's a mixed bag, but usually has something worth watching every show.

    1. Re:I'm coming out: I watch Andromeda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like andromeda too along with earth final conflict and the outer limits

    2. Re:I'm coming out: I watch Andromeda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hot injectable in Hollywood these days must be Botox. Between Andromeda, Dark Angel, (and another show which showed up briefly on UPN, don't recall the name), is there a hot sci fi babe who hasn't had botox injections?

    3. Re:I'm coming out: I watch Andromeda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed, Lexa Doig is the hottest chick on television!

    4. Re:I'm coming out: I watch Andromeda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uhhh...I'm not sure if you know what you are talking about exactly, because you don't make it clear what was enhanced.

      Lexa is probably younger than 30, and Alba is like 19 or so. Neither of them would even need botox at their age. Botox is a muscle paralytic; by and large, folks that want botox are older individuals who want to escape the signs of *aging* (wrinkles, crowe's feet, asymmetries).

      I think what you are referring to is collagen injections. They result in a fullness, esp. of lips.

    5. Re:I'm coming out: I watch Andromeda by dsplat · · Score: 2
      As a science fiction snob, I should never ever watch this show, let alone admit it, but the only episodic television show I watch is Andromeda. Even worse, it's pretty much just because Lexa Doig is so hot. (For those who don't know, she plays the avatar of a massively powerful warship, so she's not even playing someone real, and yet that's part of the appeal. Psychoanalyze me now!)


      I really like the show. Lexa's character is great, not just because Lexa is gorgeous. But in spite of some initial misgivings, the character I enjoy the most these days is Tyr. At first, the Nietzscheans just looked like a strawman for bashing several facets of individualism. Yet, I have watched Tyr's opinion of the Commonwealth change, while Tyr himself has changed little. His motivations and his identity have not altered. Sometimes the best perspective from which to understand a thing is that of someone to whom it is either completely foreign or totally anathema. SF as a genre is one of the best for doing this.

      As for the psychoanalysis, I have two thoughts. First, when my computer develops a personality, Romy is a pretty good one. Second, after years of being the voice of Star Trek's computers, Majel Roddenberry has stepped aside. The torch has been passed to Lexa Doig. I don't believe that Majel had any hand in the casting herself, but she is the show's executive producer. Arranging an indisputably competent successor is itself an act of considerable competence.

      I'm going to science fiction hell for sure.


      Not even close. Science fiction hell would be all of the best series of the past few decades with an endless stream of new episodes written by incompetent hacks. It would be abandoning all continuity. It would be lines spoken by the wrong characters.

      Good SF requires all of the same things that all good fiction requires. The mix is different, and the science has to be right. But bad characters and sloppy writing ruin anything.

      --
      The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  94. Red Dwarf is still in production. by oneiros27 · · Score: 2
    As any quick web search should quickly turn up:
    http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/
    Which, for those of us on the mailing list know, isn't presently in production for series 8. They are, however, in production for a movie.

    However, anyone can tell you -- Red Dwarf is not considered SciFi as much as a sitcom set in space.

    I do, however, have every episode on VHS, including the two bloopers tapes, and am hoping that they released the original versions on DVD, and not the 'remastered' ones where they took out the model shots and replaced them with CG. [There's just something classic about the models slamming into everything]

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  95. Re:Red Dwarf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Red Dwarf is still in production? Why??? Haven't they run out of new ways to insert the word "smeg" into their dialogue?

  96. Farscape. No... lexx. No... by rde · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since B5 ended (am I the only one worried about the Rangers?) there've been three series that are not just good; they're great.
    Lexx is great. Stargate has gone from okay to excellent. But far away ahead of them all is Farscape.
    I don't know how much you Americans have seen, but I've been watching it on DVD and I'v seen up to about half way through the second series. It's taken a fairly old plot (old before Voyager used it) and the traditional format (individual episodes, occasionally two- or three-parters, the rare reference to previous plots), but managed to be truly excellent.
    The reason it's so good? IMO, it's because it avoids cliches. On several occasions (I still haven't learnt), I've groaned as ten minutes into an episode it looks like it's going to be one of those ridiculous Trek episodes that make us all cringe. But I've invariably had to apologise (mentally, anyway) to the producers by the end of the episode.

    It may not have all the strongest plot lines, but it avoids cliche. And that's a rare and wonderful thing.

    1. Re:Farscape. No... lexx. No... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • I love sci fi, but Farscape just looks like the Muppet Show. I can't take it seriously enough to give it a chance

      I made that mistake too. I prejudged Farscape based on the trailers and the first episode (shown on a mainstream BBC channel) and point blank refused to watch the damn puppet show.

      What a mistake that turned out to be. Like CmdrTaco, I only "discovered" it in season 2 after much persuasion, and it's a real treat, and the best antidote to Voyager that I've yet seen ("Spare me the techno babble, gadget girl.").

      Seems to me that the savings on FX have all been spent on the actors and the writing. Farcape is an absolute joy, beautifully written, flawlessly acted, consistent, wry and very knowing. Also, the cast seem to have real chemistry and are obviously having a hoot filming it. The protagonist, Crighton, has taken to calling a couple of other characters "Pip" and "Sparky". That's not a cute scriptism, it's what the actor, Ben Browder, started calling them, and it sounded so natural that they decided to just roll with it. That shows a level of confidence and non-control freakery on a par with Stargate.

      Do yourself a favour, grit your teeth, ignore the muppets, and sit through an episode. Unlike B5, it's easy to pick up in the middle, and you might be pleasantly surprised.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Farscape. No... lexx. No... by Exatron · · Score: 1

      Farscape's puppets resemble Yoda and other aliens from Star Wars more than they resembel Muppets. The two groups of puppets are about as extreme as you can get considering that they are both made by the same company. The Muppets are made of felt and other fabrics with a fuzzy appearance and were designed to be simplistic and comical. Farscape's puppets, on the other hand, utilize materials like Latex, which allow for more complex and detailed skin textures, and are capable of showing a wider range of emotions. Rygel XVI, for example, looked much more menacing in "Infinite Possibilities, Part 1: Dadelus Demands" than any Muppet ever could. He tortured and killed someone in order to satisfy his thirst for revenge and thoroughly enjoyed it.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
    3. Re:Farscape. No... lexx. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Absolutely right! Farscape takes hackneyed Sci Fi cliches and turns them 180 degrees around, and inside out, taking the show in new and unexpected directions. Farscape is far and away the freshest and best written science fiction show out there. Lexx is deeply weird, but interesting to watch. Babylon 5 was great, but after watching every episode 2-3 times I need a rest until J.M.S. is given a chance to produce a new series. Star Trek, of whatever generation, always seemed to swing between the occasional brilliant episode, and a lot of mediocre and predictable episodes.

      BTW, someone did the Farscape-style plot long before Voyager attempted it (badly): Blake's 7 (another wonderful forgotten BBC sci fi series) was very similar in many ways to Farscape. They both are premised on a bunch of escaped prisoners (with the usual problems of mismatched personality types) riding around the galaxy in a stolen space ship.

      I'd like to think that Farscape is what Blake's 7 might have been, if Blake's 7 had had the budget and the special effects technology which Farscape has.

    4. Re:Farscape. No... lexx. No... by David+Greene · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's taken a fairly old plot (old before Voyager used it) and the traditional format (individual episodes, occasionally two- or three-parters, the rare reference to previous plots), but managed to be truly excellent.

      Actually, Farscape is a novel for television but doesn't hit you over the head with it. Many times I have seen a "one-off" episode only later to realize how much it contributed to the overall arc. The current (US) season is a perfect example. Plenty of references to earlier seasons, explanations and thread interweaving has made for an outstanding experience!

      You are right about its avoidance of cliches. The writing on the show is just great. I wish B5 had done as well. JMS is a great storyteller, but an episodic writer he is not. Some of the B5 dialogue was horrendous, not to mention the often tedious amount of explication. That's not to say that I didn't love B5. It remains one of my all-time favorites. Doesn't mean it couldn't be better, though.

      Farscape's homage/satire of all of SciFi is incredibly fun. DRD Pike, for goodness sake! :)

      The thing that I find most endearing, though, are the characters. They grow, change, form bonds, deceive, cheat, make up and generally act like real people. I'm very interested to see where the current character threads go at this point in the series. This is what makes a show great.

      --

    5. Re:Farscape. No... lexx. No... by IronChef · · Score: 2


      I love sci fi, but Farscape just looks like the Muppet Show. I can't take it seriously enough to give it a chance.

      Stargate SG-1 is currently my favorite show. I'm addicted.

    6. Re:Farscape. No... lexx. No... by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      But far away ahead of them all is Farscape.
      I don't know how much you Americans have seen, but I've been watching it on DVD and I'v seen up to about half way through the second series.


      Most of the way through the third season, here.

    7. Re:Farscape. No... lexx. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I love sci fi, but Farscape just looks like the Muppet Show. I can't take it seriously enough to give it a chance.

      Then you are a fool. Don't think just because there are some animatronic puppets from the Jim Henson Company, that this has anything to do with Muppets. If you are not watching Farscape because of some preconceived notion about "muppets", then it's your loss.

    8. Re:Farscape. No... lexx. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky bugger - its *made* in australia and they're not showing it. Last year we got part through season two and then they canned it, now we have **Felicity** (vomit)

    9. Re:Farscape. No... lexx. No... by turpie · · Score: 1

      I don't mind Farscape but the "animatronic puppets" are Muppets in both look and sound. For a show that looks so good in every other aspect the Muppet characters do detract from the experience. If the rest of the show looked cheap and dodgy then the Muppets would be fine, but they are out of place in a big budget show.

  97. Total Recall 2070 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not know if it is still on, but total REcall was a decent showtime started series.
    I thought it took some decent elements from other sci-fi noir and most of the time did a good job on execution.

  98. Best all time Sci-Fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr Who (I still wear my scarfs!)
    Star Trek: Whatever
    Andromeda - show sucks, but Lexa Doig rocks!
    Earth: Final Conflict - not bad
    Friday The 13th: The Series
    V
    That alien show where the aliens drank sour milk..
    Buck Rogers in the 21st Century (Erin Grey!)

  99. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try watching the ENTIRE series and then get back to us, then again it might just be too intelligent for your mind. Nice that you're optimistic about our race though, I'd bet most of the rest of us know better than that however, until we can all get over this border crap between countries and learn to live as one race there will never be peace on earth, and frankly I don't see it happening.

  100. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by mdwebster · · Score: 1

    Now I might be wrong here, feel free to flame/correct me if I am. But it's my impression that the original B5 was not filmed in letterbox and that the current sci-fi channel's letterboxing is nothing but a cheap gimmick.

    My only proof being that far too many scenes have chins and foreheads lopped off as if they just stuck black bars on the top and bottom to make it "letterbox". I have not compared side-by-side. Please tell me I'm not hallucinating here ... :)

  101. Who directed Alien3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forget who did Alien 3 - Alan Smithee maybe?

    You're not gonna believe this, because Alien3 is just about the worst piece of shit he's ever done, but Alien3 was directed by David Fincher who's also done Se7en, The Game and Fight Club.

    And yes, I actually knew that before finding the links at IMDB to post in this message.

  102. Does nobody but me like Dark Angel? by McSpew · · Score: 2

    Maybe I missed the meeting where everybody decided that only serious llamas like Dark Angel, but I think it's a great show. Jessica Alba is seriously luscious and the stories are well written. I like the neo-dystopian post-pulse rotting Seattle she lives in. I like the hard-core Russian/South African gangs that are chasing her. I like the bad-asses at Manticore who won't stop until she's reprogrammed. I really like the fact that they're not afraid to kill off characters that have appeared in more than one episode.

    All in all, it's one of the few shows I make a point to watch every week--along with Futurama, South Park and The Sopranos.

    1. Re:Does nobody but me like Dark Angel? by JohnG · · Score: 1
      I've never seen Dark Angel, but I have to comment on the annoyingness of the ads. They always refer to Dark Angel as being from "Titanic"'s James Cameron.
      Umm, hello? What about "Alien"'s James Cameron. After all I highly successful sci-fi movie franchise is a FAR better credential for a sci-fi television show than is a sappy love story, regardless of how successful it was.
      It just annoys me when marketing types care more about what's popular and less about what's relevant.

    2. Re:Does nobody but me like Dark Angel? by unitron · · Score: 2

      Alien came out before most of the target demographic (not to mention Ms. Alba herself) were even born. Titanic is what Cameron has done *lately*, and in show biz, unfortunately, it's all about "what have you done for me lately".

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:Does nobody but me like Dark Angel? by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

      I'm with you, pal. Dark Angel rocks, period. Every other science fiction show on TV has their little sets and representative characters to show off a species or group - Max gets on her cycle and just goes by pile after pile of garbage, fires in barrels, and little knots of people. The depiction of a true world where people live is almost overwhelming. Also, the characters change with time - true development, not stereotypes. Logan gets embarrassed and depressed over his handicap, comtemplating sucicide, then overcoming it, only to start losing his fortune - Lydecker's alcoholism and turncoat nature - Nana Visitor's new character - all superb. The continuing storyline also greatly contributes to the sense of development. The attitude towards guns is refreshing - Max won't touch them, Logan realizes the power of one bullet instead of clip after clip, and in the "out of town" episode a gun is potrayed as a hidden threat instead of just raw power that blasts away. The occasional focus on religion and "why am I here" is refreshing as well, particularly the Lady of the Heart episode. Most of all, Dark Angel can occasionally come up with a few moments that just plain stun the viewer and make you say - wow. "You just bought yourself a whole lot of birthdays" followed by "What was so hard about that, soldier?" and most of all Zack's final speech in the season finale. I can hardly wait to see what Max & Co. come up with next season. This has got to be the SF show that did the best job of staying on focus to a single unified vision its freshman year. I hope it only gets better. Viva Max!

    4. Re:Does nobody but me like Dark Angel? by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

      Actually, the original Alien was a Ridley Scott film and Cameron did only the sequel Aliens in the mid 80s between the two Terminator movies, for which he is much better known and is his true SF "franchise". I forget who did Alien 3 - Alan Smithee maybe?

    5. Re:Does nobody but me like Dark Angel? by Your+Login+Here · · Score: 1
      I can just see the adds now...

      From the man who introduced you to Sci Fi terror with Alien
      then redefined action with Terminator
      and introduced big budget special effects to romance movies with Titanic

    6. Re:Does nobody but me like Dark Angel? by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

      Actually, this ad approach is aimed at young females, who are the ones that made Titanic a hit. Dark Angel is very much a chick flick kind of sci-fi, which isn't bad as we need to get more babes involved - both in sci-fi shows and in watching them. Hey, there's still time to catch up on Dark Angel reruns so never having seen an ep isn't an excuse - altho better hurry, the season finale is coming up and you don't want to see it without a little exposure to the DA universe. The last ninety seconds is pretty intense drama in anybody's book...

  103. Re:New or old? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    > Even though I'm a guy I find Sam (Scott Bakula) sexy.

    Then I'm sure you're enwoodened over the new Enterprise series coming up.

    I, on the other hand, hated him in Leap, rarely watched the show, and am disappointed he'll be the next Captain. Maybe he can pull a Michael Keaton, we shall see.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  104. Andromeda = Blake's 7 by aitala · · Score: 1

    Andromeda seems to be a poor ripoff of Blake's 7 to me. The characters correspond almost one to one (in number and in traits) and the 'plot' of Andromeda is just the converse of B7. Complete ripoff, poorly executed as well...

    --
    Eric Aitala
    www.f1m.com
  105. Re:Red Dwarf by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

    > Although DS9 is awful!

    I don't know. Kira frenching Dax II kind of made the whole exercise worth while.

    --
    I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  106. Re:Sci Fi TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody who claims to have enjoyed DS9 is an obvious troll. Holy shit. Gosh, 40 minutes into another episode and yet again NOTHING IS FUCKING HAPPENING. You might as well just make up a little sheet of plastic that looks like the viewscreen on the bridge and watch a weekday-morning soap or something. Christ.

  107. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1
    B5 was one of the best shows made, and I am sad because it just went off the air in Canada.

    It sucks that Space's broadcast rights ran out. I wish I knew the exact reason. If it's in any way Space's fault, they are idiots, that's all there is too it.

    Of course, don't forget we have the 5 episode marathon today at 1pm EST. Hoping they show Endgame so I can get it on tape.

    You are certainly not alone in mourning B5's passing. Almost makes me want to move to the US.

  108. Re:Witchblade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you talking about!?! She looks like a friggin' man on the series. Hell, she's got a bigger jaw than Schwarzenegger.

  109. Re:I love Sci FI, but... by jdarr5000 · · Score: 1

    I love scifi too and I belive the at b5 could have gone so much further if it wasn't for tnt and for the most part I hate sitcoms because to me its just the same thing on any show but differant time and chanel no matter who the charters are I view scifi as at least having some creativaity for sitcoms it like laugh at how stupid i am and scifi has some storys ( some times bad ones yes ) that you can feel for the main charaters or what they are doing.

    --
    I am your lord jdarr bow bow down and pled to me and give me your anime and computer parts.
  110. Re:Red Dwarf by goodEvans · · Score: 1
    (posted in accordance with Space Corps Directive 34124)
    Space Corps Directive 34124? But sir, surely that is impossible without at least one live chicken and a rabbi?
  111. Lexx Rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lexx is such a ripoff of Red Dwarf.

    1. Re:Lexx Rip off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lexx is such a ripoff of Red Dwarf.

      Ignoring the probability that you are a troll: how is it a ripoff? I don't remember any sex slaves with nice racks on Red Dwarf (which I have not seen since the early/mid 90's), or dead Assasins of the Divine Order, or whiney captains, or living ships. Red Dwarf had a hollogram of a dead crewman, a "cat" evolved from the DNA of a dead crewman (or something), and that churlish fellow who said "smeg" all the time. Oh, and the ship's computer. What exactly did Lexx "rip off" from Red Dwarf that it could not have "ripped off" of half a dozen other Sci Fi shows? It's not as though Red Dwarf was completely "original", either.

  112. AMEN! You da man! by cREW+oNE · · Score: 1

    Amen... B5 was, and still is, the best story told on television - ever.

    --

    +++ATH0

  113. Farscape, because... by Lurking+Grue · · Score: 1

    any show featuring an alien race that farts helium has got to go to the top of the sci-fi list.

    Lots of other reasons too, but the other sci-fi shows are just too sissy to do fart jokes.

  114. Re:The Invisible Man by sunhou · · Score: 1
    Which female agent do you mean? I haven't been able to watch the show all summer (I get SciFi at school, but know at home), but the only regular "hot babe" I know of is the Keeper, who's been there since the pilot.

    There's a female agent named Alex Monroe, played by Brandy Ledford. Apparently her official web site is at www.brandyledford.com, but it's done in Flash so I wasn't able to see anything there. I did find a couple of pics of her here, although they aren't that great. While searching, I also discovered that she apparently played Dawn Masterson on Baywatch from 1999-2000. So yeah, it seems like a Seven-of-Nine like move bringing her in, but to their credit, they don't have her running around in spandex. Also, the first few episodes of the new season this summer, I don't think they specifically mentioned that she was new (unless I missed it), so I thought maybe she had been around before, but just not in the few reruns I had seen before.

    As for the doc (I guess she's called the Keeper? The British woman), I don't know if I'd say she's "hot", but she is kinda cute, and quite the geekette.

  115. Re:By Far The Best: Baywatch by cookiej · · Score: 1

    If those breasts aren't science-fiction, I don't know what is!

  116. Babylon 5 by llordreefa · · Score: 0

    Simply the best. I'm also a Farscape and Trek fan, but B5 rules.

    1. Re:Babylon 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bab5ers always whine about Trekies.
      Always whine about trekies talking bad about Bab5.
      This is what I get out of posts like this.
      I notice that in this discussion I have seen some people post about trek but not taken the opportunity to bash Bab5.
      Now you come talk up your favorite show, which was the point of the article and then start talking trash about another show people like. This kills the impact of your talking up Bab5.
      So tell me is it Bab5 that produces asses like you?
      Is it possible for more of the Bab5 fans to talk about their fav show without acting like 9 year olds?

    2. Re:Babylon 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (from flow@zip.com.au) The story throughout B5 is classic, Startrek (and others) should take somemlessons from it. The "continuation" in that show with the technomages was terrbile.(I forgot what it's called...) Farscape is good. I also like DS9, Voyager is a little shoddy. Just a little problem for SciFi viewers in Australia(like me): 1 channel (Nine) seems to own all the "space" SciFi shows. And they're really bad at showing them! Farscape has disappeared, now we're seeing ST:NG AGAIN, and all in late timeslots, currently after midnight! Originally got into B5 because of it's links to the Amiga, and after the first season it just got better and better. Was in Reno for 3 months last year, and wish we had an equivalent of SciFi+UPN(?) here in Australia, they showed a lot of rubbish, but also good stuff (I especially liked going "home" for lunch and watching a B5 movie!) Saw a lot of Farscape there and loved it. Come on channel NINE! bring it back! Enjoy!

    3. Re:Babylon 5 by unitron · · Score: 2
      B5 is like West Wing, when a re-run comes on you wind up watching the whole episode in spite of having seen it already. That's due mostly, I firmly believe, to dialogue.

      I was thinking yesterday that Earth: Final Conflict hadn't turned out as good as I had expected when it first started, and I suspect part of the problem is that its focus wanders because it isn't pre-planned the way B5 was, so each episode is written without enough regard to how it fits into the overall picture.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    4. Re:Babylon 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To say that EFC has 'wandered' is an understatement. I actually like EFC, but every year they have systematically thrown away most every story development effort in order to try something new (and improve the ratings).

      Get rid of boone, replace with Liam. Bring in beautiful Rene Palmer. Not enough babes, bring in Street. Get rid of Augur. Bring back Augur. Sandoval is evil. Sandoval is secretly good. Sandoval is really evil, and has an evil sidekick. Taelons are Wimpy. Jaridians hatch another nefarious plot with no ramifications. "Oh wait, Ma'el did that 2000 years ago" ... Bring back Boone.

      Oops, maybe I shouldn't have mentioned that last one. The point is, while shows like Babylon 5 do attempt to do the "story arc", EFC seems more like "Let's fiddle with the circumstances until someone watches it".

    5. Re:Babylon 5 by unitron · · Score: 2
      I'd like to see them bring back Boone. I'm still waiting for the guy who killed his wife to suffer some really horrible fate. Unfortunately when you kill off a character and then bring them back with some sort of gimmick it's usually shark tank and jump ramp time.

      My only source for the show is WGN on cable and they usually move it around to make room for Cubs games or put it opposite 3 other things that I want to tape, and right now they seem to be running re-runs from previous seasons, so I'm having a little trouble keeping up with where things stand in that particular imaginary universe.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  117. Stargate SG-1 by ASaidi · · Score: 1
    Stargate SG-1 is great! It is a continuation of the movie Stargate, but they explore numerous worlds and have well developed characters. Stargate Website

    The current season is shown on Showtime and the previous season on FOX.

    1. Re:Stargate SG-1 by DaSyonic · · Score: 2
      I agree completely. I've never missed a stargate episode, thanks to the SG1-Archive (Please though be a showtime subscriber if you download any of the episodes there.. I am, But it's saved me from times before I had a TiVo)

      It's gone into differant director's hands over the past few seasons, so it's also interesting to see the differances between the seasons. I like the way It's going.

      However, I've heard that this may be their last season! It will be very sad if that's the case. I would love to see it live on, but if not, let's hope the ending is good.

      --

      Linux: Because a PC is a terrible thing to waste.
      James Brents
    2. Re:Stargate SG-1 by goodEvans · · Score: 1

      It would be even scarier if there was a true story based on the movie that was based on the tv series that was based on the movie...

    3. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The contents of the damn site you mentioned is only accessible inside the USA (ie try selecting episodes from the schedule) What w*nkers showtime must be to make an internet site, then limit its content

    4. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Limited+Vision · · Score: 1

      Not only is the character development strong, but the interplay between them is superb. Teal'c's mastery of understatement (his raised eyebrows speak volumes) when responding, General Hammond's patient tolerance of O'Neill, the underlying sexual tension between O'Neill and Carter, O'Neill's glaze when Jackson and Carter go off on technical tangents, or his mindless repetition of something he obviously doesn't understand...

      The military loves the show - the general who guest starred actually is the Air Force Chief of Staff, General Michael Ryan. (My dad used to work for him, so I'm a fan...)

      The time loop episode, 'Window of Opportunity' had me laughing so hard it hurt. I could hardly breathe. But the alien-building-a-stargate-in-the-basement was classic. "Oh, and you're going to need a new microwave."

      I also heard that this is the last season. That's too bad, since it has only been getting better - the writers and actors have really hit their stride. God knows how they will end it.

      Thanks for pointing out the archive, DaSyonic - that'll fill in some gaps.

    5. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Scorchmon · · Score: 1

      There was an article at Sci Fi Wire that stated there was going to be a Stargate SG-1 movie. I can't wait.

    6. Re:Stargate SG-1 by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

      So that means it would be a movie based on a TV series that was based on a Movie. Please tell me that it was further based on a book which was based on a true story ;-)

      --

    7. Re:Stargate SG-1 by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

      I also love how they give the characters a human touch, theyre not superhuman. O'neil always goes "Ok, thats a needle" whenever hes about to be poked, clasic.

      --

    8. Re:Stargate SG-1 by kevdog · · Score: 1

      O'Neill's glaze when Jackson and Carter go off on technical tangents, or his mindless repetition of something he obviously doesn't understand...

      I just loved how Jack described Cassandra's ability to lift the Chess pieces in the recent episode, "The Rite of Passage". That was hilarious!! Also, Amazon has a list of humorous quotes from season 1. Check it out.

      I have to agree that Sg-1 is the best sci-fi series on TV at the moment.

    9. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Limited+Vision · · Score: 1

      Man, I watch that show waaayyy too much, because reading through that list of quotes, I can hear exactly how they would be saying it.

      The intonation and emphasis can be funnier than the writing itself.

      I also like how they play Jack's mistrust of the Tok'ra, and how he complains that they never give them all the details (which is true...)

    10. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [sorry]

      We at Showtime Online express our apologies; however, these pages are intended
      for access only from within the United States.

      We encourage you to visit our other exciting sites:

  118. I just don't get it by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    I watched FG a couple of time and found it to be painfully unfunny. The dad is pretty good, sure, but he's a shameless Homer-ripoff. The baby is just annoying... that character's entire schtick seems to be that he says/thinks things that are too sophisticated for a baby. Big deal. Nothing he says is actually funny to me, just odd (and tiresome) coming from a baby.

    Blech!

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  119. Sci Fi TV by Warin · · Score: 1

    I may be the only person to admit it, but I genuinely hope that Enterprise doesn't stink and that I can enjoy it.

    I for one like Scott Bakula, and think that if he does it right he could be a decent captain. But I suppose we wont really know until this fall. Perhaps Berman wont curse this show like he did Voyager. Maybe the Great Brd will reach out from the grave and infuse Enterprise with something more than Berman gave Voyager. And here's hoping that the Borg never turn up! I am all for a show that gives us more Tellarites, Andorians, and Orions, and less Borg and Holodeck fantasy.

    Thank heavens for Space. At least not having an UPN affiliate won't mean htat I have to wait a year for Enterprise.

    1. Re:Sci Fi TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My last one didnt take. Yes I agree with you totally. However, Enterprise will have the same directors, producers, and writers as Voyager. Prepare for crap.

    2. Re:Sci Fi TV by naked+code · · Score: 1

      Berman was also invloved with DS9 which was the best of all the series, but he blew it with Voyager and it's PC cursed banality. Maybe 3rd times a charm. We can only hope.

    3. Re:Sci Fi TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree with you. However, the show will have the same directors, producers and writers. Prepare for crap.

    4. Re:Sci Fi TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be interesting. By takeing the new series out of our galaxy, it opens up all kinds of possabilities. For those who remember, the Next Generation series set precident for why all of the intelligent creatures in our galaxy were huminoid. Now that they are leaving our galaxy,,perhaps we'll see some interesting and bizare new life-forms.

    5. Re:Sci Fi TV by Slacker+Prime · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm...I would have to say the best science fiction on television right now would be: Farscape, Babylon 5, Quantum Leap, The Outer Limits (though it's gotten a bit cheesy since its move to SciFi), Stargate SG-1, The Invisible Man (at least its entertaining), MST3K (of course), and ST:DS9 (if you can find it).

    6. Re:Sci Fi TV by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Oh come now...Star Trek in the 90s would just not be the same without the holodeck (it malfunctioned again?) and the time travel back to Earth of our current day. And the political correctness reflects the viewpoint of the vast majority of Next-Generation/V'ger viewers, so just be quiet about that.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Sci Fi TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comformaty, and PC leads to what 99/110 /.ers hate, Microsoft. It stifles creation, and imagination. The only reason for all of it to please a bunch of whiney people who are just trying to one up other people. I'd go into it more, but this isn't the topic to do it under.

    8. Re:Sci Fi TV by Twelvemotionjs · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. The borg were cool to start with, but then became an overused trick to gain ratings. I could never stand the holodeck episodes of ST:TNG, I want to see "space, the final frontier" when I watch star trek.

  120. By Far The Best: Baywatch by veddermatic · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know what kind of futuristic world it is where all the babes look like that, but I wanna go there =)

    --
    Department of Homeland Security: Removing the rights real patriots fought and died for since 2001
  121. Re:My vote is for... by Catskul · · Score: 1

    I miss Star Trek: The next generation. It was truely amazing to see what sci-fi can be with a budget like theirs.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  122. I love Sci FI, but... by Faizdog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The unfortunate problem with Sci Fi is that rarely anyone besides us "geeks and/or nerds" seem to like it. If I'm sitting around with a buncha friends, and we are channel surfing, if I see a cool show like say Star Trek TNG (in my opinion the best Star Trek), they won't even consider watching it.

    There is some sort of stigma attached with Sci Fi that mainstream people just don't seem to like it. Sure there are exceptions (most prominent one being X-Files when it was good), but many people just don't want anything to do with Sci Fi.

    That being said, I really love Sci Fi. Some of my favs are Star Trek, and old stuff like Quantum Leap, that rocked. Maybe that's why I'm actually looking forward to the new Star Trek with Scott Bakula. It's got a really interesting premise, and if they can just do it right, it has the potential to be awesome.

    --
    -"Those who fought today will die tommorow."-
    1. Re:I love Sci FI, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your logic is flawed somewhere. Lots of people watch science fiction; if this were not so there would be hardly any sci fi shows on television. Either there are a lot more "geeks and/or nerds" out there than you think, or there are a lot of non-geeks and non-nerds who like science fiction.

    2. Re:I love Sci FI, but... by simm_s · · Score: 1

      I respectfully disagree. The original Star Trek and Star Trek TNG transcended the Sci Fi stigma. I know a lot of non geeky people who watch Star Trek like it is just another show. You might have forgotten that the first star trek movie and first contact we smash hits. Too bad Bablyon 5 could not get past its scifi stigma.

  123. Easy. Babylon 5. by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Babylon 5 re-runs have just come to an end in Canada, except for a 5 hour "viewers choice" marathon tomorrow starting at 1pm est.

    B5 was by far the best sci-fi on TV for several reasons.

    The effects: The budget per episode for B5 was a tenth of what ST:TNG cost, and by the time B5 reached the 5th season the effects were just stunning. Quite possibly the best space battles ever in a sci-fi show.

    The story: While you could watch most B5 episodes as a seperate entity, the dedicated viewer was rewarded by one of the best stories I've seen in any medium. I won't even try and encapsulate it here, but it ranged from great comedy (some of the Londo/G'Kar scenes, plus various comments from other characters, particularly Ivanova.) to tragedy (no spoilers here. Suffice to say the show has it's fair share of tragedy.) Unlike shows like Voyager or Next Gen, B5 started a story, and ran it to it's conclusion. There were changes from the creators vision along the way (JMS is a genius!) for various reasons, but the description "a novel for television" was used, and fairly so.

    Characters: No annoying robots or cute kids. Every character was believeable. Every character had flaws. The characters evolved. B5 could and should be used as a teaching piece on character development. Another thing I liked was the fact that you never felt any character was indispensible. In TNG, you know damn well Picard, Riker etc... aren't going to snuff it. In B5 I always felt like no character had a free pass. That added immeasurably to the show.

    Realism: Unlike the shiny happy universe of Star Trek, B5 had real problems. Homeless people aboard the station for example. JMS (I won't even attempt to spell his surname) made a believable universe by including such elements.

    The music: The show was great, but Christopher Franke's (ex of Tangerine Dream) music moved the show up a level. There are scenes which just rip your heart out, the music is so poignant. (Again, no spoilers.)

    The alien races: While most were humanoid (not all) I think the aliens designed for B5 were FAR better than the blindingly obvious "human under makeup" aliens of Trek. The Pak'Mara for example looked amazing, and while the main players are the standard "human under makeup", the diversity of the portrayed alien cultures was amazing. Oh, and not all of them breathed oxygen. The station has section for non oxygen breathers.

    For all your B5 needs, go check out The Lurkers Guide.

    In closing, Babylon 5 is the best sci-fi there has ever been on TV. I look forward to the new "Legends of the Rangers" but I can't see, in all honesty, how it can possibly live up to Babylon 5 itself.

    Besides, you have to love a show that blasts a teddy bear into space:)

    1. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there was a Bigass Screw Up(tm) Between WB and Scifi. I believe many episodes in seasons 2 and 3 were not true letterboxed. Rather, just cropped. This was fixed during the second run.

    2. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I feel slighly less crazy now... :)

      Especially since watching an episode recently and it looked perfectly alright ... :)

    3. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Thank you for the amazing breakdown. I myself am a Huge Fan of this series, and was watching since GROPOS. It's a must-see. Infact, the only series to actually come close to its glory has been Farscape, but still has not beat it just yet.

      Some good sites to go to for Babylon 5 information and discussion:
      The Lurker's Guide to Babylon 5. A great reference source. It has THE most comprehensive episode guide for the series, it's movies, and its spinoff, Crusade. They Include a Synopsis, Notes, Comments from JMS, and other related information. The site also includes a B5 term encyclopedia, which can be beneficial for those who don't understand a term.
      B5 Tech Reference. This site, while containing large amounts of fictional information, is a decent reference for anyone seeking information on the spacecraft of Babylon 5.
      FirstOnes.com. While this is a shameless plug, If you want to talk with other babylon 5 fans, go there and visit the forums. You'll meet some interesting people from around the world. While it's primary mission has been abandoned (to raise the Babylon 5 Space Combat Simulator, Into the Fire, from the dead), it is being transformed into a source for everything Babylon 5. (well, that's the plan, at least =) )
      Hyperspace Ship Guide. Another great reference page for the spacecraft of babylon 5. This has less fanfiction than Babylon 5 Tech, but less information as a whole. It has some great images, though.
      The Down Below Sound Archive. This Page has a sound bite of just about anything you could want from this show. It's a great place to go if you want something along those lines.
      Babylon 5: The place to be. This is another great site, loaded with 3D art and the models to make your own! Check it out sometime.
      The Music of Babylon 5.. This is another great Babylon 5 Resource. It's webmaster posts various soundtracks from Babylon 5 on a regular basis. Most recently, the site had put up Battle Sequences A-F, the Sampler tracks for the music in Babylon 5: Into the Fire. Take a few minutes and listen to it.
      The Shadow Information Office. A great page dedicated to correcting the popular belief that shadows are evil monsters. Rather, it shows that they have a very incolved culture, and exist for the sole purpose of assisting the other races. Check it out.

      I hope these links are put to good use. There is a lot of information on the web. most of it bad. This should clear up some of that. Sanfam Out.

    4. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Thanks for the compliment. It's nice to be able to praise possibly my favourite TV show (closely followed by Twin Peaks incidentally), particularly given it's re-runs have just ended in Canada.

      GROPOS was a great episode. Good example of the poignancy I mentioned I think.

      The best episodes IMO are around the middle of the 3rd season. The three episode arc Messages from Earth - Point of No Return - Severed Dreams and the two parter War Without End are some of the finest TV you can see, particularly Severed Dreams. That episode was so good, when I saw it initially, I had taped it due to being out. I watched it. Sat there with jaw on the floor at what I had just seen, rewound the tape, and watched it again.

      I didn't like the fifth season much. Due to the cancellation woes that the show faced, the fifth season felt tacked on somehow, but having just watched it all again, I was unfair. It was actually a very good season. For those fans of Neil Gaiman, he scripted the fifth season episode "Day of the Dead". A very good episode, but one, like the others I mentioned, that really need to be seen in the context of the rest of the show to fully enjoy them.

      As for Farscape, Space up here in Canada is airing that this fall, and having heard so many good things about it, I will check it out, despite my initial observation that it looks like little more than Muppets in Space:)

    5. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Allow me to echo your praises of Babylon 5: by far my favorite TV sci fi series, although Farscape is coming up a very close second place right now, for me. The two shows are very different, though, so it is almost unfair to compare them. B5 was plot- and story-arc driven, and was about "big ideas" ("War and Peace" in space, as Harlan Ellison once described B5). Farscape is more character- and personality-conflict driven, rather than being about "big ideas". Farscape has fewer main characters than B5, but for that reason, it can explore them in greater detail. I see B5 and Farscape as different, but complementary, viewing experiences.

      As for Farscape, Space up here in Canada is airing that this fall, and having heard so many good things about it, I will check it out, despite my initial observation that it looks like little more than Muppets in Space:)

      Please, please, please, don't make that mistake! This is the Jim Henson Company's work, but these are NOT Muppets! The two characters (Rygel and Pilot) are not "cute" or "funny" and Farscape is not for children! Don't let small children watch Farscape thinking you are going to get an updated version of The Muppet Show's "Pigs in Space". Farscape is dark, violent, and very, very adult. Not for kids. The animatronic puppets are just character actors who happen not to be "real people". They are not for kids. Rygel in particular, in spite of being small and "cuddly looking" is a very mean, nasty, spoilt SOB who is often not nice. This is an adult show, for adults. Remember that, and enjoy your first exposure to Farscape. The first season starts slowly, but things really get interesting in seasons two and three, as they build on the character development.

    6. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by Buran · · Score: 2, Informative
      Here's another vote for Babylon 5.

      Interestingly, the effects on the show were done with the off-the-shelf Lightwave 3D software, which I've been playing with off and on along with some ship models downloaded from the Net.

      The series is still shown, in letterboxed form, on the Sci-Fi Channel -- and I'm eagerly awaiting the Rangers film. Hopefully, the series will continue through to a theatrical film as some say it will.

      Just because a show isn't in production any longer doesn't mean that it's not worthy of contention. By the way... I think the new Trek series' re-use of the Akira-class ship design was a cop-out. I wanted to see something fresh and new along the lines of Earth Alliance vessels with a Trek touch...

    7. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      B5 has to be one of the best series ever made for TV, of any genre. Certainly all of my family watched it, SF and non-SF fans alike. It takes a rare kind of magic for a show to attract that wide an audience.

      I thought it was a shame that JMS decided to look into the future -- when inevitably all of the characters we'd come to know and love were dead -- in the final episodes of series 4 and 5 ("The Deconstruction of Falling Stars" and "Sleeping in Light"). I felt that some of the action from those episodes, particularly SiL, was unnecessarily saddening. Rumour has it that even some of the cast cried when they saw a certain character's exit scene in the final cut of that one.

      On the whole, though, B5 is probably the single most impressive show I've ever witnessed, and a lasting tribute to all involved. I hope that Legend: Rangers can live up to the expectations (and that someone will pay up to finish Crusade, which was looking promising, but seems to have stalled).

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    8. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by SectoidRandom · · Score: 0, Troll

      I dont know maybe just here in Australia since all we get now of Bab5 is re-runs on cable (i think season 3 or 4?), but i would disagree with most of your points right off!

      Firstly whenever I look at the show and just think, fuck my GeForce3 even kills that. The special effects just look so simple! I dont know if ive seen much of season 5 or anything, but it all just looks like some PC game! :(

      There is no realism to it all, except I will say the alien costumes / etc, they are pretty good, very close to the ST:VOY/DS9 quality.. (That is my benchmark here btw)

      But the main gripe i have with it, is the story! 90% of the time i watch it i get that feeling, "ahh fuck no dont be this lame, come on i want to be entertained!" :) The worst thing i found was that feature movie (cant remember the name), damn i hate storys which go like this:
      * Good human suggests exploring relations with X race.
      * Military agree's that the big race X with an apparently huge military etc should be investigated.
      * Send big war ship and find MOST arrogant war loving murdering captain to command this peacefull mission.
      * Act supprised when you start intergalactic war.

      *Shudder* that movie about the history of the war with Minbari (sp?) made me sick! And unfortunatly far too many episodes give me the same feeling. :(

      One thing with your realism comment, i kind of like the idea that one day we as a race will be able to resolve a lot of our problems, ie, poverty, stupidity, etc. :) Thats one appealing factor of ST for me at least. But i guess we are all very different..

    9. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by bill.sheehan · · Score: 2
      IMHO, GROPOS, despite being scripted by David Gerrold, was a weak episode. The scene of the dead soldiers at the end looked like a staged tableau. Nevertheless, with the possible exception of "Infection," even a weak B5 episode was hands down better than what's been churned out lately by the Trek franchise. Pity, too. I just watched a bit of Voyager this afternoon. Fantastic opening, beautiful heroic music, and then the letdown of a silly plot. (Does anyone else think that the Voyager spaceship looks like Douglas Adams' description of the Heart of Gold, "a sleek running shoe?")

      "Never send me something cute." -- JMS, about the "Bear-ba-lon 5" teddie bear

    10. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1
      The effects: The budget per episode for B5 was a tenth of what ST:TNG cost, and by the time B5 reached the 5th season the effects were just stunning. Quite possibly the best space battles ever in a sci-fi show.

      Except for a scene here and there, I think the FX were stunning right from season one (done on Amigas) and they still are not starting to look old.

      The music: The show was great, but Christopher Franke's (ex of Tangerine Dream) music moved the show up a level. There are scenes which just rip your heart out, the music is so poignant. (Again, no spoilers.)

      Two songs/music sequences stand out for me. Once is where the Narn cruisers are ambushed and battling the Shadows, which is used for the season 3 intro, and the bar background music when Sheridan is captured by President Clarkes men.

      B5 was one of the best shows made, and I am sad because it just went off the air in Canada.

    11. Re:Easy. Babylon 5. by MyKarz · · Score: 1

      SciFi? Hmm, well I grew up on Star Trek... but... As soon as I saw a couple of episodes of B5... I and my clan of 20 or so advid Star Trek watches dropped ST like a stone... Intertwined consistent plots and sub plots, more depth in each character than whole movies usually devote just to the main character... And some good research at the NASA JPL to insure that those space scenes are obsolutely believable and top notch... What else can I say? I can say that I have read Slashdot for almost 2 years, but today I felt it required to register and post this response. Hey JMS and/or SciFi Channel, more Babylon5 please! 110 episodes is not enough, as long as you keep the quality up (I wont talk about Crusade).

  124. Lexx by SirSlud · · Score: 2

    I like Lexx. Why?

    - It happens to so stupidly far in the future
    - the sexual innendoes .. man, the show should be required viewing for middle school kids in order to bolster social tolerance!
    - its funny

    just my two cents .. btw, I believe Lexx was created by Canadians. Can anyone confirm this?

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  125. Stargate SG-1 by coyote-san · · Score: 5, Informative
    Stargate SG-1, based on the movie Stargate is original programming on Showtime, and syndicated a year later. The new Outer Limits followed the same approach.

    The movie and early episodes were occasionally painful to watch as a writer tried to include some pseudoscientific nonsense, but they seem to have put that past them.

    The benefits of Stargate SG-1?

    • Excellent continuity, but with a good mix of new material. A welcome change from Star Trek, which alternates between total amnesia and years-long story arcs.
    • Solid backstory. They have a USAF advisor to make sure the military procedures make sense - and even had a brief appearance by an USAF general on active duty. They do enough research into ancient cultures that watching the History Channel is surreal - all of the names are familiar.
    • Sane technology. A lot of bad SF lets the technology dominate the story. Stargate SG-1 generally uses standard (or near standard) contemporary technology. Alien tech is rarely used by the SG teams, and aliens generally only use a handful of devices. No sudden solution to the problem by generating an inverse tachyon pulse or other crap like that.
    • Strong characters. There's only a half-dozen major characters, each with well-defined roles (the four members of the team, General Hammond, and the doctor.) There's maybe a dozen recurring minor characters, each well-defined. There's no sense of having seen the same character a dozen times before, only with a slightly different forehead.
    • Most importantly, a good sense of humor. Some of the episodes are deliberately over the top (Urgo), but there are also a lot of serious episodes with extremely funny, but totally natural, sequences. (E.g., the alien who constructed a new stargate in Sam's basement with hundreds of pounds of titanium(?), 7 100kW lamps,... and her toaster.)
    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  126. Best Story: Roswell by Gery · · Score: 1
    Well here in central Europe, I am much delighted to be able to see Roswell.

    Its the best built up story (so far - we're at the beginning of the 2nd season, so I dont know if the story gets worse) for a tv-series I've ever seen. And 'Max' is really cute...

    As I saw on some webpages, in the US those scifi-series are way ahead. What's coming next? Any new good series?

    Gery

    --
    The answer is yes, me.
  127. Good S.F. on TV? by dannycim · · Score: 1

    When they start airing Cowboy Bebop on TV, then I'll watch. Everything else pales in comparision. Check Bebop on AnimeFu. It's Good.

  128. Re:Red Dwarf by jeremyp · · Score: 1

    Not to my knowledge. It is several years since RD8 went out in the UK. I'd have thought if another series was going to be made, it'd be out now.

    --
    All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  129. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  130. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by spanky555 · · Score: 1

    I didn't USE to watch cable (much)...until I got a Tivo. Now I can use Tivo to glean all the good stuff, even if I'd never be awake or home during a show...and skip the crap (commercials).

  131. Best Sci-Fi by Fixer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I haven't seen television since Feburary, but last I checked, they had re-runs of Babylon-5 on. I'd say, in order, Babylon-5, Farscape, original Star Trek re-runs and StarGate SG-1 are the best scifi on American televsion today.

    --
    "Avast! Prepare for the rodgering!" THWACK! "Arrr.. me nards.."
  132. Andromeda by Octal · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm personally a big fan of Andromeda, although I do also enjoy Earth: Final Conflict and Stargate SG-1. I'm not holding out much hope for Star Trek: Continuity Error, though.

    (<sarcasm>Cable? What the hell is cable?</sarcasm>)

    1. Re:Andromeda by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2

      Andromeda is uneven - the good episodes are really good, and they have done some nice worldbuilding which I want to see more of on screen. (When do we get to see a Vedran?)

      The bad episodes have been unspeakably putrid. (That prison planet one, for instance.)

      But still, I make a point of catching the new episodes, and I'm looking forward to the next season. They seem to have a pretty strong "story arc" like Babylon 5. (No way of knowing if the series is working up to a definite ending of the story, though, since the producers aren't on the net talking about it much.)

      Farscape, I gave up on about midway through the first season.

  133. New or old? by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    The best is still Quantum Leap. Even though I'm a guy I find Sam (Scott Bakula) sexy. Even more because on the show he's got like 7 doctorate degrees or something.

    The more I watched it, the more I liked to nit-pick at the science of it, but that is only half the show.

    It's the only show with science, drama, and a revolving storyline that changes from week to week. I know that Star Trek has some hidden metaphores and the first interracial kiss on television, but not enough of the show was really dedicated to the human condition.

    Hands down, Quantum Leap. In fact, you'll see me in front of the TV everyday at four o'clock watching sci-fi.

    ---
    Someone told me 'Frasier' is the favorite Scientologist show on TV
    ---

    1. Re:New or old? by max_power26 · · Score: 1

      Hands Down Quantum Leap. I'd take Sam and Al over John Crichton and Aeryn Sun anyday of the week and twice on Sundays.

      And the old Star Trek's of course are great. But not even Kirk has had to save the world while trapped in the body of a chimp. (Has he?)

      --
      King Arthur: Are all men from the future loud-mouthed braggarts? Ash: Nope. Just me baby... Just me.
  134. DS9: Not the 'best', but deserving a mention by Jaymes+B.+Nimrahd · · Score: 1

    I can understand all the grief over Voyager, and TNG was definately SF for those who don't like SF, but Star Trek: Deep Space 9 was definately a Good Show, with many Moments of Greatness (but too many Moments of Embarassment, esp. in the first & last seasons). B5 for the Star Trek crowd, if you will -- some of the ideas and approaches that made B5 special, but without the pretentiousness & avoiding running out of ideas for the final season.

    Also loved "Now and Again", and miss it much. Not sure if I can watch it again, knowing the terrible cliff hanger it ended on...

    1. Re:DS9: Not the 'best', but deserving a mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can understand all the grief over Voyager, and TNG was definately SF for those who don't like SF, but Star Trek: Deep Space 9 was definately a Good Show, with many Moments of Greatness (but too many Moments of Embarassment, esp. in the first & last seasons). B5 for the Star Trek crowd, if you will -- some of the ideas and approaches that made B5 special, but without the pretentiousness & avoiding running out of ideas for the final season.

      I'll take Babylon 5's "pretentiousness" over Star Trek's preachy, politically correct, sanitized and sachrine view of the future, any day. I think whatever science fact may come to pass, the reality of life in the future is going to look a lot more like JMS's vision of the future than Roddenberry's: Realpolitik, wars of extermination, greed, intrigue, betrayal, good intentions with bad results, bad intentions resulting in unintended good results, and the overall inability of anyone to shape the future in the manner they desire.

      The United Federation of Planets: where no one needs money anymore, but where everyone acts as though they do; where the Prime Directive prevents interference, but somehow the "good guys" always end up interfering anyway, "for their own good" (sort of like the liberal new world order!).

      In the future, all we will get from Roddenberry's vision of the future is a good laugh.

  135. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by TimeHorse · · Score: 1

    I agree. I think if there is another one of the Sci Fi polls with blah blah blah Star Wars blah blah blah Star Trek blah blah blah X-Files without even a MENTION of the 26-year Sci-Fi series that PREDATES them all, I'm going to be sick. Now don't get me wrong, I like Farscape and I like Babylon 5 and I even like the Secret Adventures of Jules Verne which Sci Fi cancelled -- though it's still being produced. Of course, Doctor Who IS available on DVD -- at least in the U.K and Australia, and in the U.S. next month. So why not we show some support for the good Doctor and get him on this poll to show all these young'ins what are only interested in the glitsy, $100k budget Sci Fi what some REAL television is about. :)

    Devo Andare,

    Jeffrey.

    --
    Time Lord, Dark Horse: The Techno Mage of Gallifrey
  136. Since you didn't specify NEW Sci-Fi by psykocrime · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd have to vote for Doctor Who. Doctor Who is the greatest Sci-Fi series in the history of Sci-Fi.

    Just find a PBS station that shows re-runs, or see if BBC America is still airing their early morning episodes, and kick back and enjoy.

    --
    // TODO: Insert Cool Sig
  137. Re:Good and bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee. You sound really tough.

    I mean. You're Dad is all special forces. He must be able to beat up my dad. And you ride a motorcycle, which means you must be extremely masculine. I feel so weak now.

    And you use really arcane words like dojo. Obviously you spend a lot of time working on your mental training. It really shows in your post. You must spend a lot of time meditating on how you can use "my hands, chains, a broken bottle, and just about anything else that I can get my hands on" to beat up anyone who you might think is a "muscle head".

    You seem to like to stereotype. There are two groups: Like-Me and Not-Like-Me. You'd be hard pressed to fit me into either. But when in doubt, you'd best just hate me, call me stupid and lump me with the frat boys you so adamantly hate.

    I ridicule fraternities as much as the next geek, but I am mature enough to realize that not all guys in fraternities are frat-guys. And that not all atheletes are steroid popping idiots, and that many people in the military are actually intelligent.

    I wish I could tell you the world is as simple as you want it to be. Its easier for you to think about that way. Less complicated. You dont have to actually talk to anyone. In high school, I could have been mistaken for a jock. Now that is a long time ago, but I still don't look like a stereotypical coder.

    Well, wake up, you childish idiot. You hate stupidy? Well, there is always going to be someone smarter than both you and I. Intelligence isn't linear, like you simple mind comprehends it. Just like the world can't be split into frat-boys and geeks, you cannot seperate smart from dumb.

    If you would have watched the show more than one episode, you would realize that Crichton often seeks to do things with as little force as necessary. Something you might think of next time you have to save a girl from a drooling frat boy.

  138. tears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when i watched the latest episode of babylon 5, a tear came down from one of my eyes.

  139. Re:Red Dwarf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First proof RD is great SF. My wife hates Sci-Fi. She will not Watch ANY Sci-Fi. I Tivo it all and watchit when she isnt around. Then one night I was woken up by her laughing at RD. BUSTED! RD is also on BBCA in the USoA. I dont klnow what time. Ask my TIVO. -j

  140. Voyager was great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what you are talking about, blame Voyager? Voyager was the best thing on TV..

    1. Re:Voyager was great! by naked+code · · Score: 1

      absolutely right. worst ending of all the various Start Trek series. They don't get it right with the new one, I'll be relegated to watching DS9 reruns.

    2. Re:Voyager was great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The feeling I always got when watching Voyager was: tired.

      Always the same problems with dilithium, getting trapped in the same friggin' caves and the same personal problems rehashed from time to time.

      Not to mention the absurd final episode which completely ruined the future of the StarTrek universe.

    3. Re:Voyager was great! by darkPHi3er · · Score: 1

      i once spoke to the God Head Geek who authored many of the biggest selling books on the ST serie(s) and we discussed the "Voyager" phoenomenon...

      BOTTOM LINE: The Voyager crew, most esp Janeway (I want to have her babies, NOW!) and the interplay between the crew, in particular Chakotay and Janeway brought a humanity to ST that had been missing since the original.

      sure, DS9 was largely better written and TNG was largely better acted, but DS9 never (despite some amazing work from the cast, esp Avery Brooks and Nana Visitor) quite grabbed me...

      ...TNG hit a forumula very very early and relied on Picard's strong jaw, Riker's engaging smile and Data's antics episode after episode after....(with some help from John de Lancie and the Borg)

      There has been a quality of reality and compassion and caring and simple humanity that transcended the normal "costume drama" of most TV
      Sci-Fi....

      the original ST had it ("Damn it, Jim! You're KILLING him!"), and at their best TNG and DS9 got there occasionally, but Voyager has a simple sweetness and hopefulness about it that i find engaging

      Voyager has been nearly as good as B5, and B5, at it's best, has blown away every S/F show ever made, from F/X to writing to acting B5 has extended the metaphor...

      now, let's see what Bakkula can do (another winner of the "David Caruso Career Managment Award"....Bakkula (and Stockwell) quite often hit homeruns with Leap, despite high lameness scripts and really bad historical accuracy...maybe Scott has one good show left in him????

      MOD THIS DOWN!!!! RECONDITE INFORMATION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE TO /.

      --
      Ten quid, she's so easy to blind. And not a word is spoken...
  141. Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by Triode · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ahead of its time then... a little lamish on the effects by todays standards, but it was great. As I have no cable I have no idea what is on now... Does anyone really watch Cable?? I thought all these /. people were DVDers...

    1. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 1
      BBC America actually stopped showing it just a few weeks ago... and it was no great loss, all things considered. They never got the rights to air more than a handful of serials (no more than 20 of the 150+ stories produced), and scheduled it at ridiculous times (I believe the final time slot was 5:30 AM). In addition, because the original 25 minute timeslot (produced for noncommercial British television) didn't suit American commercial needs, they managed to insert more than half-an-hour of commercials into it to produce an hour-long show.

      A number of PBS stations still carry the program, however. A list of said stations is available at the Nitro-9 site, specifically at http://nitro9.earth.uni.edu/doctor/broadcast.html.

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    2. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Those of us who live in Maryland are lucky... Maryland Public Television still shows Dr. Who on Saturday nights.

      During fundraisers, MPT often will say "This is how much money we need to keep The Doctor for another six months. Once we get this much, we wil shut up and show an uninterrupted marathon of Dr. Who."

    3. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by unitron · · Score: 2

      Whereas in North Carolina they ran Dr. Who for a few years, then used "The Five Doctors" during their annual fundraising to draw in all the sci-fi fans (and their money). They haven't aired any Dr. Who since.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    4. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dr. Who, along with all Star Treks since the original, and anything on SciFi channel is for limp wristed pansies. La Femme Nikita and X-Files seasons 3 & 4 are for the hardcore.

    5. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by SomeoneYouDontKnow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Agreed 100%. Although Doctor Who had B-grade special effects, the thing that made the show work was the intelligent and witty writing. When you have that, you can live without the big budgets. But without it, all the effects in the world won't do any good.

      Speaking of British sci-fi, I'd also like to mention Blake's 7 and Red Dwarf. I especially tip my hat to the latter. The humor will have you doubled over with laughter.

      On the American scene, Stargate SG-1 is still doing quite well, although I was a little disappointed with last Friday's episode. The Outer Limits is also an interesting show to watch. Psi Factor was also good when it first came on the air, back when it was divided into short stories. I haven't seen it much in the last few years, though.

      --
      That light you see at the end of the tunnel might be from an oncoming train.
    6. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 1
      I agree. I think if there is another one of the Sci Fi polls with blah blah blah Star Wars blah blah blah Star Trek blah blah blah X-Files without even a MENTION of the 26-year Sci-Fi series that PREDATES them all, I'm going to be sick. Now don't get me wrong, I like Farscape and I like Babylon 5 and I even like the Secret Adventures of Jules Verne which Sci Fi cancelled -- though it's still being produced. Of course, Doctor Who IS available on DVD -- at least in the U.K and Australia, and in the U.S. next month. So why not we show some support for the good Doctor and get him on this poll to show all these young'ins what are only interested in the glitsy, $100k budget Sci Fi what some REAL television is about. :)

      And even now Doctor Who isn't dead. Big Finish has a license from the BBC to create original Doctor Who audio adventures on CD (which have been very well received), the BBC is still churning out original books at a rate of at least one a month, and recently the BBC did an online story featuring the Seventh Doctor and Ace on their homepage. (/. story on it here.) About 99% of those polled on the BBC page think that Doctor Who should come back, as well.

      I agree, it's sad that people ignore old classics like Doctor Who in favor of the new stuff out... I for one am glad the Doctor is still out there in one form or another. :)

      Just my $.02...

    7. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Dr Who was great. I miss the TV shows, and I miss McCoy.. although McGann was a decent change..

      I discovered Dr Who when I was seven (late 70s), one saturday morning flipping through the channels and stopping on this weird sci fi show on PBS.. needless to say, I was hooked.

    8. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by jrp2 · · Score: 1

      a little lamish on the effects by todays standards

      In my book that was one of the best parts of Dr. Who. I laughed out loud at many of the cheesey effects and believe that aspect really made it all work and let them take artistic license to the extreme. IMHO, it would have been far less entertaining if they had done high end effects and staging.

      What would the show have been with Dahlecks (sp?) that did not have toilet plungers for arms?

      --
      The only athletic sport I ever mastered was backgammon - Douglas William Jerrold
    9. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      KPBS in San Jose shows Dr. Who every Sunday at 11PM. They have been for like 15 years now. They show it from the 1st Doctor on... They also show Red Dwarf!

    10. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by shadowlight1 · · Score: 1

      For the record, Dr. Who is actually in production. Not on TV though, audio adventures..with the original cast members. The stories vary widely in quality, but it is nice to hear the voices again. Also nice are the new 8th doctor adventures (the guy in the 1996 TV movie). Check it out at: http://www.doctorwho.co.uk

    11. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dalek - an anagram of Kaled (the race from which they evolved)

    12. Re:Too bad Dr. Who is not on... by tomoe27 · · Score: 1

      Dr. Who can be found at 8am EST on BBC America, if you have that channel on your cable/satellite

  142. SciFi Channel by gbender · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Speaking of SciFi...back to the future 3 is on SciFi channel right now. Hell Yeah.

  143. Blake 7 by sckeener · · Score: 1

    Now there's a show I want to see reruns of!

    The reason I want to see some Reruns are there are only 3 seasons worth on VHS...for the remaining season my TIVO and my computer are going to get aquainted. :)

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  144. Best Sci-Fi on TV ...or not... by codyps · · Score: 1

    I wish the network would bring back Space Above And Beyond. It was awesome! It had an all to short run.

  145. Damn you YTV! by Pope · · Score: 1
    Here in Canadia, the only place I could get Farscape was YTV: Wednesdays at 8.

    Then when the more 'mature' second season started, it moved to Saturday at 11pm or something stupid like that. Now it's simply gone.

    I usually try to avoid "Sci-Fi" shows in general because 90% of the time the writing and plots are horrible and predictable, in that order. I had to be convinced to watch Farscape half-way through the first season because I immediately thought "Great, another crappy SF show." Now It's gone, dammit!

    I have to concur with other posters: for the channels I get, Buffy all the way.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  146. I can not believe no one mentioned... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Star Blazers/Space Battleship Yamato so far! come on, you can not be that old! Even though it is anime, it has all the qualities of B5 and ST TNG. And more drama than any other. And the best music ever.

  147. Re:What about Buffy and Friends? by SonofRage · · Score: 1

    I guess it wasn't insightful when I mentioned Buffy 20 minutes ago.

  148. Re:I'm coming out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And let me guess, you want the world to know?

  149. disk space? by klund · · Score: 2

    The scary thing is that the Sci-Fi channel has finally edged out Comedy Central and Cartoon Network on my Tivo for disk space.

    You have limited disk space on your TiVo?

    Some weak hacker you are!

    --
    My word processor was written by Stanford Professor Donald Knuth. Who wrote yours?
    1. Re:disk space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he has hacked his TiVo for more disc space, but he just can't bear to delete anything. :-)

    2. Re:disk space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Poor boy. You can network your Tivo, hence resulting in pretty much as much disk space as you need. Cross the sub $5 grand terrabyte server with the Tivo network hack...or at least a Pioneer DVD recorder and a DVD-ROM changer.

  150. Angel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Witty humor.
    Charisma Carpenter's tits.
    Supernatural violence.
    Charisma Carpenter's ass.
    Evil lawyers and the occult.
    Charisma Carpenter's blowjob lips.

    It's a good show.
    I'm typing with one hand right now.

    1. Re:Angel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's quite obvious.

      A/S/L ?

    2. Re:Angel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What? You're afraid of some language? Sheesh. Bit skittish aren't you--or should I say Puritan? More than talk about T&A and nice lips goes on in the real world, trust me....

    3. Re:Angel by WINSTANLEY · · Score: 2, Informative

      Avoiding the issue of cheesecake... If you want to include fantasy in with SciFi, Buffy and Angel are some the best writing on TV (even when compare to the Sopranos).

      --
      It is by coff... er, will, alone I set my mind in motion...
  151. INVADER ZIM RULES THE WORLD YOU MEATBAGS! by Philipv1 · · Score: 1

    I have this ranked HIGHER than Farscape on my Tivo. It is seriously one of the best cartoons ever made. It is a downright RIOT and im laughing my ass off at nearly every episode. GIR rocks! Seriously! Stick this on your Tivo and you will NOT be disappointed. It's on Fridays nights at 8pm CST on Nickelodian (I have NO IDEA how they picked this up as its more adult humor, but I thank them for it!).

  152. Babylon 5 by ltning · · Score: 1

    I know I know.. It's not on 'now' (except SciFi US), but it's still _the_ scifi show. It's got a really well-thought out universe and plot, the story goes well beyond the start and the end of the series as such, the actors are great, and.. well.. I think a lot of people would benefit from watching it ;)

    What I usually say to ST fans who claim B5 is crap and has no story and is a soap opera like anything else is: Can you, after seeing the entire ST:TNG series (all seasons), then see one episode and pinpoint it to a specific point in the story? Usually not. With B5, I could do that pretty accurately; a good indication that to B5, there is a story, to ST, there is (almost) no story.

    And to piss ya folks off even more: ST is entertainment. B5 is brainfood. ;)

    --
    Love over Gold.
  153. Re:What about Buffy and Friends? by albanac · · Score: 1
    And, though it technically isn't SciFi (more horror) what about "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and it's spin-of "Angel".

    I'm going to have to rant about that. Neither Buffy nor Angel are SciFi, as you've said, but they also most certainly aren't horror. Gothic, yes: you do vampires, gothic is kind of inevitable. Buffy is more like Clueless with added stakes than a horror film: Angel is Bladerunner with teeth. Defining them as horror demeans what Joss Whedon managed to write (in my opinion): an admittedly teenaged but relatively dangerous mythical world.

    Ok, I'm done.
    ~cHris

  154. Re:Modern Sci-Fi's problems are simple by Profound · · Score: 1

    Kurt Vonnengut makes fun of that aspect of sci-fi through his literary alter ego, Kilgore Trout. He never could come up with any decent characters, only his ideas are good. At Trout says "In all of my years as a writer only once did I create a living, breathing character... And I did it with my ding dong in a birth canal!"

    Ironically Trout is possibly the best developed of Vonnegut's reoccuring characters.

  155. Best (and worst) by Runt-Abu · · Score: 1

    IMNSHO the best Science Fiction show i've seen on the goggle box for a while is still the classic "Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy" (recently repeated on BBC2) funny, charming and ultimately making more sense of life, the universe and everything then anything else has to date.

    Outwith classic Science Fiction the incredible epic "Space: Above and Beyond" which constantly impressed with solid story lines and intersting characters without focusing on the technology of the time.

    A close runner up is the alien horror of "Dark Skies" which despite being slow and at times over-reaching was very good.

    The worst show I've seen is the indescribably "VR.5" which I'm sure had a story line somewhere, I am just not sure where.

    --

    GCM d+ s+:+ a- c++ U? P! L E-- W++ NM+ V PS- PE+ Y+ PGP- t 5+ X?+ R+++$ tv+ b+ DI++++ D---- G e
  156. Space, Above and Beyond by andyh1978 · · Score: 2

    I have no idea if this is showing on any channels right now, but I liked it.

    Was probably because I started watching it after playing some of the Wing Commander games; there's a lot of similarities, but anyway it's a nice bit of fun sci-fi in its own right.

    1. Re:Space, Above and Beyond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to love SAaB. I turned to it when I finally admitted to myself that I hated Voyager and wouldn't watch it anymore. SAaB was always well executed and interesting. The story arc seemed like something between Starship Troopers and the Pacific conflicts of WWII. (wrenching defeat after defeat, strategic victories one at a time...) no happy endings on this one, nothing that happened was ever forgotten in later episodes, and no wacky support characters attempting the lighten things up. The only 'social lesson' they really ever shoved down your throat was: War sucks and you're never gonna be the same. Oh, and Tanks are people too. it's no coincidence i started playing Colony Wars on PlayStation obsessivly around the same time...

    2. Re:Space, Above and Beyond by Falsch+Freiheit · · Score: 2

      SciFi channel shows repeats Wednesday during the day. I already saw all 23 episodes or so when it was first airing on whatever network that was back in 1995. Still worth watching when sitting around at home unemployed and you want to avoid writing the next cover letter for an hour, though.

    3. Re:Space, Above and Beyond by DanMcS · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most days of the week SciFi does several hours of 'scifi-world, ____ land", like fantasy land or horror land or whatever, they'll show 4 hours of a particular series from about noon to 4 or 1 to 5, I forget. I just happened to catch S:A&B on wednesday of this week (I think), but the schedule appears to be random, on thursday they showed Fantasy Island. An excellent show, I agree, and I watched it when it was first on several years ago.

      --
      Communication is only possible between equals
    4. Re:Space, Above and Beyond by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 2

      S:AaB was, for me, one of the few SF shows it *never* felt painful to watch. Everything from Star Trek TNG to the X-files to (especially) the Outer Limits had at least a few episodes I was embarrassed to admit to have shared a planet with let alone watched. But S:AaB never slipped. There were a few points in some episodes which were shaky, or budget-constrained in terms of effects, but in general it was rock-solid. It had Babylon 5 (another great show) style semi-"realistic" space dogfighting, an enemy who was vicious but not completely dehumanized, and three-dimensional characters in all facets of the show. SPOILER: the final episode was wrenching - Wang's death and the probable deaths of Vansen and Damphousse were shocking and possibly the most honestly handled character deaths I've ever seen on TV.

      --
      Freedom: "I won't!"
    5. Re:Space, Above and Beyond by 4thAce · · Score: 1

      One I still miss too. But to me, this was maybe 25% Science Fiction and 75% Combat genre. So much of the plot revolved around the esprit de corps of the 58th, something I could tap into despite never having served myself. I always felt that this increased the realism one or two notches above the portrayals of war on all the other SF series on television (even B5 which I am an admirer of also).

      --
      Inventor of the LOLbalrog meme.
  157. Mobile Suit Gundam and 08th MS Team (not M$) by SSJ_Ramon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    These two series are currently being aired on Cartoon Network. They're great. MS Gundam (the original) is old-school goodness and 08th MS Team is very nicely done. These ain't politically correct. Characters develop, characters even die, and they don't bother with brain-damaged pep talks afterwards. I do understand that anime is not universally appreciated here at /. but these really are legitimate sci-fi stories. Just thought I'd bring 'em up.

    --

    This .sig is void where prohibited, no purchase necessary.
  158. First Wave by squeegee-me · · Score: 1

    I always liked First Wave with the exception of one thing which is, at the end of a lot of episodes, Cade and his archrival usualy end up sharing a bit of info, and saying "thanks and good luck killing me next time." There are reasons behind this, but I won't get into them.

    I also like B5 because in some ways it's series ran much like a SciFi soap opera in someways where they ran from one to another and jumped to a part of one episode three seasons ago. I was one of the guys half asleep on Monday because I would stay up till 2:30 Sunday night to watch that weeks episode as I did not have cable. Thankfully the priest with amnisia was never the father of the Narn female who was in a coma stranded at the bottom of a cliff in a cave wating for her misterious lover to return from collecting pelts to trade for food.

    The Sentinel was also a decent show and was unique when it first came out when the UPN network was launched, but now I only watch it when I'm flipping channels looking for something to watch if I have the time.

    The Invisible Man is a decent show to watch, but after you see a few episodes you know what to expect, good guys verses criminals, using secret weapon to win and hiding the secret. Cool, but the same special effects and the typical warm and fuzzy sceen at the end with the characters patting eachother on their backs.

    I also want to mention the SciFi production of Dune. I loved everything I saw, but I missed two of the four episodes and was totaly lost. I borrowed a friends copy of the original movie with Patrick Stewart and I had a better understanding of the story. I then went out and bought the SciFi series on DVD.

    Finnaly I want to mention The Visitor. In a way this show reminds me of The A-Team with a strangly dedicated Military officer chasing after the main character who wants to do nothing but help people in need. Here you have an alien who just has some snazzy power that heals things, and he uses it to help everyone he meets who is in need while trying to save the world from the currious scientists who will kill everyone if they dabble in new materials from space and other races.

    Oh, BTW, Lexx scares me.

    --
    Who wants Pork Chops?
  159. Serious SciFi starvation in New Zealand by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

    Here in New Zealand I am all to aware that the majority of people think SciFi is crap - it's plainly evident just by looking at our tv schedules.

    Basically in this country our only scifi fix currently is coming on a Saturday night from TV4 (free to air channel that is a little off-beat, alternative, cool :-)) , consisting of Quantum Leap (airing this from episode one (although I thought that first episode was a 2hr pilot when it was first released), DS9 - which I don't watch, OSI and if we are lucky a movie after that.

    On a sunday afternoon TV4 shows reruns of Voyager (mmmm 7of9) and DS9. Occasionally the other channels show the odd movie of interest (last Saturday we were treated to "Contact" again). TV2 started playing a series of (mmm Gillian Anderson) XFiles (which, I hve to disagree with people and say that the first series with Robert Patrick is quite good) and then pulled it midstream for no reason. We got one season of EFC from 4 (not bad...). TV3 played Dark Angel , but while they own the rights to (mmmm Gigi Edgly) Farscape (of which we have seen 1 season, several years ago) they refuse to play it. TV4 were playing Perversions of Science, which I liked.

    TV2 is probably the worts...not only did they pull XF, but they played Brimstone and Strange World in absurdly graveyard times - great shows and they just killed any future they would have had here. I'm guessing they own series of SG1, but we havn't seen it for ages.

    TV3 is JUST getting into series 3 of Charmed (mmmm Holly Marie Coombs), that's more fantasy though (good but(ts :-))).

    Damn, we need a SciFi channel here, I need an intavenous SciFi infusion stat.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  160. Re:I can't believe no one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The owner of all of the movies for seasons 8-10 was the Sci-Fi channel(actually USA networks). Some might have had some problems (merlin's shop of mystical wonders 1003?). But getting more bad movies was never a problem. It really was just marketing stupidity. The show started as, and never should have been considered anything other than, a way to take the lousy movies you show at 2am and juice them up. I really don't think that the Brains were costing all that much. Sunday night at 11pm for the new eps would have been fine. Then, regular repeats throughout the week whenever a gap opens in the schedule. They regularly show standard bot fodder, you can't tell me the puppets cost that much.

  161. Re:syndicated Stargate new season: Sept 11 by Jordy · · Score: 2

    I actually do as well. I got hooked on SG-1 and actually the now cancelled Total Recall 2040 (to a lesser degree).

    --
    The world is neither black nor white nor good nor evil, only many shades of CowboyNeal.
  162. Farscape is great but... by bani · · Score: 1

    Can someone explain why the HELL sci-fi channel
    keeps pushing that "john edwards" crap?

    It's called the "SCI FI" channel you fuckwit
    scifi channel execs, not the "PSYCHIC HOTLINE
    CHANNEL"!

    Next think you know, they will be running an
    hour of "john edwards" back to back with an
    hour of "mistress cleo" in the smack middle of
    prime time. :-(

    1. Re:Farscape is great but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New thread, However I am in total agreement. The program makes me feel very ill. Ed (takes forever to sign up I guess)

  163. Re:Red Dwarf by R.Caley · · Score: 1
    The wonderful thing about (the best bits of) RD is that it actually manages to do some SciFi in with the humour.

    Eg in Polymorph II they come up with a (so far as I am aware) novel solution to the old `how do you tell real person from copy' puzzle.

    And it doesn't preach. Rodenberry infected all US TV SF (acronyms, ya gotta love 'em) with the disease of sanctimonious preaching. Even B5, by far the best of the bunch, suffers from this.

    I also agree with someone else who mentioned Blakes 7. a wondeful antidote to ST. A villain you had to admire (lust, lust) and a `hero' who was a scheming selfish bastard. And (in the early series when it was worth watching) a great spaceship. Pity about the effects budget though.

    The SciFi network here just finished showing The Prisoner. If that lets me count it as SF then I vote for that in the top few too.

    --
    _O_
    .|<
    The named which can be named is not the true named
  164. VCR by mrBlond · · Score: 1
    You lucky bastards, here in South Africa we have The X files, and, erm, that's it. They used to show The outer limits at the same time (gotta love the programming genii who really know their viewer demographic). Hell, when Voyager was still on (the last season we had was with the introduction of 6 of 9) that was the best sf on tv :(

    My VCR is set for Frasier, Dharma & Greg, Spin City, The West Wing, Homicide: LotS, X files (watching The Sopranos on at the same time, missing The knock on at the same time), F1, a very good local investigative news program, and the ecology shows.

    --
    CowboyNeal for president!
    "Hit any user to continue."
  165. My vote is for... by Arminius · · Score: 1

    Farscape. But what I will be real interested in seeing the new series Star Trek: Enterprise.

    --

    ------
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  166. Re:Red Dwarf by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    personally I think that series 5 and 6 were the best (you seem to totally ignore them).

    While it isn't as good as it was, series 8 was a lot better than 7. I reckon that if they hadn't brought kochanski back then both 7 and 8 would have been a lot better as well.

    people do seem to ignore the first two series mainly because it was a different style. This is unfortuante because there is some classic stuff...

    Lister : rimmer are you awake ?
    Rimmer : yes mum, i'm just packing my satchel

    Did you know that the BBC originally planned to axe it after the first series but they had alreadly commisioned the second and spent loads of money on it.

  167. Re:The Invisible Man by Transwarp+Conduit · · Score: 1

    MST3K still enjoyed considerable popularity on the Sci-Fi channel, though... I think they might've gone another season or two, except for two problems:

    #1 - Creative burnout. It was simply becoming too hard to sustain the level of energy needed for the series.

    #2 - Dwindling supply of movies to mock. Not that there aren't lots of movies deserving of the MST3K treatment, but the people who held the broadcast rights to those movies were starting to get more demanding about royalties and such, or were simply denying permission outright.

  168. Re:I can explain it... by uptownguy · · Score: 1

    Actually, mainstream people are embarassed to watch bad mainstream programs like Baywatch, Vpier, Knight Rider and the Dukes... There might be a bigger audience, because now you are dealing with a MAINSTREAM subculture instead of a geek subculture, but no matter how big Baywatch got, it was never in the same category of "not a little ashamed to admit it" like a Hill Street Blues, an E.R. or The Sopranos... now those shows were mainstream ...





    (psst, and you know what? The writing was/is pretty good on each. Never really been a regular viewer of any of them, but they all have a level of sophisticated writing that I only wish a sci-fi show could approach.

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  169. Stargate SG-1 !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are five seasons to date. Season three just started in syndication on local channels with season four starting Sept 11th and season five is underway on Showtime. You can buy the entire first season for $80.00 ish from Amazon.com or directly from mgm. Links: Official site: http://www.stargate-sg1.com/ Great fan site w/ synoposis: http://www.scifiguide.net/stargate/

  170. Sarcasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What part of your post was sarcasm?
    The sig or the actual post?

    Andromeda is great if you want to laugh at how cheesy it is.
    Its basically, Xena (or Hercules) in outer space.
    I cant figure out which is worse, the acting, writing or effects.
    The short lived Space Rangers was infinitely better than this drivel

    Then again, if you want great cheese, you have to check out Battlefield Earth. You will laugh you ass off.
    (Oooops, Xenu is after me for making fun of $cientology....!!!)

    If those Travolta-Cruise twits ever decide to make this into a series, it could be funnier than Red Dwarf which of course, has better writing than any sci-fi garbage out there.

    zeke

    1. Re:Sarcasm? by fwc · · Score: 1
      What part of your post was sarcasm? The sig or the actual post?

      I think he forgot to close his sarcasm tag in his previous post.....

    2. Re:Sarcasm? by cookiej · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Geeze. Get over Kevin Sorbo, OK?

      I find Andromeda to be absolutely fascinating. Sure they're derivative, but so? Let's talk about ST:TOS eposide "Balance of Terror" -- can you say "every sub/destroyer movie made?"

      I enjoy the show. I enjoy the characters on Andromeda. The effects grate on me terribly (Mainframe did a better job on "Roughnecks" for God's sake!) but I can live with it. I think the Nietzscheans are a fascinating sub-species. I can do without the Magog but for a first season, it seems to be getting it's legs. Anyone remember the giant jellfish dog that was "Encounter At Farpoint?" Even TNG took a season and a half to get good.

      It's a cool concept. If they decide to make things progress as they did in B5, it might be great. I look forward each week to that show -- really the only one I don't miss.

    3. Re:Sarcasm? by Octal · · Score: 1

      Can you not recognize opening and closing tags when you see them?

  171. Back to CN for Outlaw Star by jnik · · Score: 1

    I hate to push you back over to Cartoon Network, but Outlaw Star is really some of the best TV sci-fi I've ever seen. The characters are interesting and well-rounded and the plot just keeps on churning to the finish line. It's unpretentious, solidly done entertainment. Expanding out to DVD's, Gasaraki, also done by Sunrise (Outlaw Star, Cowboy Bebop) is seriously cool; hope CN gets a chance to pick that one up and give it broader exposure. Dark Angel has looked pretty intriguing to me, although I haven't delved into it, and of course B5 and Crusade reruns are always good. Is anyone doing reruns of Nowhere Man? (Does anyone besides me remember the show?)

  172. Outer Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd suggest something non-episodic, like Outer Limits. I also might suggest certain animes, which aren't as character-obsessed as disappointments like Voyager or as drawn-out as things like X-Files.

    The problem with most Sci Fi is that you already know generally how things are going to end: no matter what anomaly the Enterprise encounters, the ship has to survive and survive intact or else you have no future episodes. No matter what freakish mutant Scully and Mulder do battle with, they're both going to find a way around it that involves bad lighting and horrid camerawork.

    Shows like Outer Limits generally have less focus on characters, and more focus on the stories the characters have to deal with. That seems like something of a plus, as the unpredictability and mortality of non-reccurring characters seems more real. Suspension of disbelief is a lot easier when the characters don't seem so immortal.

  173. Secret Adventures of Jules Verne by iCharles · · Score: 1
    For "current" shows (it just ended season one, season two is up in the air), I'd have to say it's "The Secret Adventures of Jules Verne." Consider":
    • Based (loosely) on one of the creators of the genre
    • One kick-ass female hero (Rebecca Fogg)
    • Steampunk feel
    Really, this is probably my current favorite SciFi on TV. Perhaps third (behind "West Wing," and "Sports Night" reruns). Cheers, Charles
  174. The simple algorithm to determine good SF/TV by stox · · Score: 1

    Simply grep for involvement by Harlan Ellison. It has about a 66% hit rate. :-)
    On a related note, has anyone noticed that one of the finest pieces of SF to hit TV has finally been re-released after over 20 years? Ursala K Le Guin's "The Lathe if Heaven".

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  175. C-SPAN and Court TV by GMontag · · Score: 1

    Obviously the most entertaining, if not a bit far fetched, Sci-Fi on TV is C-SPAN and C-SPAN2 (especially during tech related hearings) with Court TV running a distant third.

    Cops is great fiction, but lacks the level of science required to be called Science Fiction.

  176. Re:Some SciFi... by jhittner · · Score: 1

    The new stargate shows are playing now... There have been some very good ones this season

  177. Witchblade by ShaggusMacHaggis · · Score: 1

    Witchblade on TSN (i think?) is pretty damn good. Took me a few episodes to get into it (afterall, her costume was much more..ahem, revealing....in the comic), but I really dig it. If you haven't seen it, it's on tuesday nights.

    1. Re:Witchblade by unitron · · Score: 2

      Go back and check her out in Mann and Machine.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  178. Ahem.. Blake's 7? by Kayax · · Score: 2, Informative

    Somebody else has already brought up the other shows I was going to talk about (Andromeda, Dr. Who, Red Dwarf)... but where's Blake's 7?

    Unfortunately it wasn't particuarly popular, but it did run for 4 seasons on the BBC. I think that the character development was quite good, especially in the first half of the show. The characters were usually out for themselves first and for the group sort-of when it was convienent. Plus no ridiculous pseudo-philosophical problems.

    The overall story line was very believable too -- a group of unlikely outlaws rebelling against an tyrannical Federation -- and not any of the silly utopian nonsense you get with ST: The Marxist Generation. And major characters would often die, making it more realistic.

    Of course the series did have its downfalls. Towards the end it seemed they ran out of stories and the episodes got pretty silly. Plus they suffered from the typical BBC attention to special effects. On most occaisons you couldn't see the strings on their models..

  179. There is no good Sci Fi on TV by slaker · · Score: 1

    Go on and mod me down. I have a +1 (reminding me of D&D) and I'm not using it.

    I read Science Fiction constantly, particularly hard SF from the likes of Larry Niven, or military SF (David Drake, David Weber). I've watched the recent star trek series'. I've seen all the supposedly great new shows on SciFi.

    And I yawn. Boring.

    X Files used to have its moments (although my favorite X files moment was the episode that involved Sculley and a tatooo. Yum)
    There were a couple of times Babylon 5 was mildly interesting.
    ST:TNG was utterly predictable. Voyager was just unwatchable.
    Blake's 7, Red Dwarf and Dr. Who are all shown on PBS affliates around here. Dr. Who proves it's possible to make an entire TV show out of cardboard, but I don't think it's very good.

    Sad thing is, I keep trying to watch, hoping I'll find something great. Nothing is out there that's as compelling as the stuff I can check out at the library.

    OK, so what, in my opinion, is the best SF show on TV?

    Futurama.

    "Bite my shiny metal ass!"

    --
    -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    1. Re:There is no good Sci Fi on TV by hydro17x3 · · Score: 1

      There's a fine line between sci-fi (futurama, buffy, farscape, etc..) and science fiction (larry niven etc..) Keep that in mind when you compare a book to a tv show, and how many hard facts you can actually place in a tv show. Sci-Fi : Fiction who's science is an idea not entirely based on reality. Science Fiction : Fiction who's science is generally an accepted theory or based on possibilities of the known laws of the universe. Nowthat i'm done bitchin' I vote for farscape

    2. Re:There is no good Sci Fi on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I read Science Fiction constantly, particularly hard SF from the likes of Larry Niven, or military SF (David Drake, David Weber). I've watched the recent star trek series'. I've seen all the supposedly great new shows on SciFi.

      And I yawn. Boring.

      I've known a lot of guys like you (I almost used to be a guy like you). You take Science Fiction so seriously, you capitalize it and short hand it as SF, and contrast it with "Sci Fi" which you loathe. You are incapable of enjoying much outside your self-imposed niche literary ghetto. I got news for you, kiddo: it's not TV Sci Fi that is boring, it is you that is boring.

      Most of us "fans" will get hours of enjoyment out of quality programming and well-written, well acted TV (especially Farscape, Babylon 5, and Blake's 7), which we can appreciate for what it is, not for what it is not. That's your problem, in a nutshell: you are so obsessed with what you want to see produced, that you are incapable of enjoying the good stuff out there that is being produced, all because it does not measure up to your self-imposed and arbitrary definition of what is "good SF". It's your loss, not ours.

  180. Easy: MST3K by spanky555 · · Score: 1

    Easily the best show on TV, period. Not always sci-fi, but most of the movies they watch are sci-fi. You'd never get to see most of those movies on TV if they weren't put into this context.

    The funniest part about this show, is that I have a hunch the idea was hatched by stoners sitting around making comments about bad movies...because they say a lot of the same type of stuff my friends and I would say when watching bad movies.

  181. Depends on the season by Pope · · Score: 1

    How dare you forget Eva Habermann! :)

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  182. Babylon 5,Quantum Leap and Star Trek TNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I started watching babylon 5 when it first started airing on TV and I still watch it when I get a chance (I work 4 days out of the week till 7:30) Babylon 5 is the only Sci Fi Tv show I've seen that has maintained the same plot for it's whole 5 year season. At the same time babylon 5 is almost beleivable. The characters are real people and the show's computer effects and portrayals of how things would really happen are very well done, compared to some other shows that leave you saying to yourself "that couldn't happen". Sci Fi should be a convegence of Science And Imagination.

    1. Re:Babylon 5,Quantum Leap and Star Trek TNG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Babylon 5 rocks!!

  183. Interzone -- Best Sci Fci Currently on Television by GGardner · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Right now, a copy of Interzone magazine ( http://www.sfsite.com/interzone ) is sitting atop my television, making it far and away the best SF on my television.

    Most SF fans know that many of the most interesting genre movies are derived from short stories (i.e Blade Runner, The Minority Report, even A.I.). What a lot of people don't know is that these short stories often first appeared in SF magazines. Magazines such as Interzone, Asimov's, and F&SF aren't in good financial health right now, even though they are the nursery for a lot of SF writers.

    A yearly subscription to most of these costs less than on month's cable bill, but gives a lot more entertainment, and helps to ensure the future of SF writers.

    End of pledge break -- now back to our regularly scheduled Microsoft bashing

  184. Babylon 5 by tjnit · · Score: 1

    I would have to go for Babylon 5. I can't wait to see the new movies later this year.

  185. I can't believe no one... by Reverend+Raven · · Score: 1

    Has not mentioned the best form of Science Fiction on television....Mystery Science Theater 3000. But no, my precious MST3K was killed by Sci-Fi (3 days from now, it'll be two years) to give Fartscape and First Wave, what they define as "hard sci-fi", a better place on television. Despite having a very low budget and costing next to nothing to make, despite having an audience without ANY promotion or advertising, and despite the fact that it should have been in it's prime time line up, it was shuffled to the Sunday 11:00 PM EST timeslot. It's so not fair. ;)

    --

    --Reverend Raven
    Desperate days demand dire deeds.
    1. Re:I can't believe no one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't blame the cancellation of MST3K on Farscape - that's lame and your misuse of the Farscape name is childish (and probably punishable under the geek code).

      MST3K was okay, but it had had a good innings and it was time to give it a rest. MST3K was not exactly blazing new trails or covering new territory, and it was hardly that original or funny any more.

      If I had to chose, I would pick Farscape over more MST3K any day, and I think most Sci Fi channel watchers would agree.

    2. Re:I can't believe no one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MST3K was killed because the owners of the movies started wanting too much money for their use.

  186. I can explain it... by uptownguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is some sort of stigma attached with Sci Fi that mainstream people just don't seem to like it. Sure there are exceptions (most prominent one being X-Files when it was good), but many people just don't want anything to do with Sci Fi.

    Did you read what you just wrote? "Sure there are exceptions like X files when it was good" Its not like the US is a hotbed of high culture, but even mainstream viewers have some taste and, frankly, most Sci Fi sucks!

    "...well, it was nice to see another installment in the Star Trek universe, but Voyager's writing sucked..."
    "...Dr. Who was ahead of its time, but, gee, the special effects were painful to watch..."
    "...Sliders was a great idea, but each new universe was riddled with logical holes..."
    "...Lexx... well... Lexx..."

    The unfortunate problem with Sci Fi is that rarely anyone besides us "geeks and/or nerds" seem to like it.

    The problem (IMHO) with most SciFi is that it is almost never well executed.. Geeks seem have the intelligence to see past the (rather substantial sometimes) flaws and keep watching, but most people are honest enough to just keep channel surfing.

    Geeks, for whatever reason, get off on preferring intelligent crap over stylish crap. They would rather see a TV show with the latest uber-gadget/newest buzzwords in physics/hot chicks with the biggest breasts who never seem to have to wear a standard uniform...

    But, its not like mainstream people hate SciFi... mainstream people are embarassed to watch bad SciFi, that's all...

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    1. Re:I can explain it... by _eid�lon_ · · Score: 1
      Geeks seem have the intelligence to see past the (rather ubstantial sometimes) flaws and keep watching

      This is typical of genre art/genre fans--they'll put up with serious flaws if whatever attracts them to the genre is present, but the general public isn't interested unless it's reasonably well done overall. For example, I'm not a fan of the 'western' but I liked High Noon. On the other hand, if it's SF in visual media, I'm enthusiastic if it doesn't make me wince very much.

      And I'm really not sure if the problem is that there is so little that meets this standard, or if it's just that however much there is I want so much more....

    2. Re:I can explain it... by Jodrell · · Score: 1

      Sturgeon's Law is always strictly enforced:

      "90% of science fiction is crud. That's because 90% of everything is crud."
    3. Re:I can explain it... by Charm · · Score: 1
      hot chicks with the biggest breasts who never seem to have to wear a standard uniform...

      She is not a member of starfleet, is unranked and therefore can wear what she likes. For info on this watch the episode Nightingale.

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
    4. Re:I can explain it... by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      So then tell me why Troi got away with it, too... you tell me that smart guy.

      You know its about the breasts...

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  187. My sci-fi picks by koreth · · Score: 2
    Some of these have been mentioned already, a couple not, or maybe they've been modded way down.

    • Dark Angel. No, not because Jessica Alba is a hottie. It has wonderful continuity, good interplay between the major characters, a truly despicable villain who nonetheless isn't just a one-dimensional cliche, and a visual style that isn't like anything else on TV right now (even if it's maybe not entirely original). It also makes a decent attempt to be plausible in the science department, most of the time anyway.
    • Futurama. Continues to do a hilarious job of skewering sci-fi cliches.
    • Andromeda. Again, good continuity with a sense of a larger story being told (as a B5 nut this scores lots of points with me), interesting characters, good effects, and story concepts we haven't seen done a million times before.
    • Lexx. This brings me back to my college days of watching videotapes of awful old sci-fi movies on Saturday nights. Last season kind of dragged on but this year is a hoot so far.

    Stargate is just below my threshold -- not bad and I catch it pretty often, but I feel like I watch enough TV as it is so I don't follow it religiously.

    1. Re:My sci-fi picks by EEE · · Score: 1

      Futurama, are you serious? Andromeda, also are you serious. By far the best star trek the original serious.

    2. Re:My sci-fi picks by dsplat · · Score: 2
      Dark Angel. No, not because Jessica Alba is a hottie. It has wonderful continuity, good interplay between the major characters, a truly despicable villain who nonetheless isn't just a one-dimensional cliche


      Hey, the good guys in Dark Angel aren't one-dimensional either. That's one of the things that I have loved about Farscape. I had the advantage of coming into it late and catching up on two seasons in a few weeks from a friend's tapes. I got to watch Crais evolve as his anger cooled. The principal villains are as much characters as the protagonists. Oh, and of course the protagonists come to blows, shoot at each other, betray each other, and have unpleasantly complicated sex lives that are at least more believable than your average prime time soap opera.
      --
      The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  188. Re:The Invisible Man by Nutt · · Score: 1

    Bah. I wish I got the sci-fi channel at school. I'm missing out on some great shows :(

  189. syndicated Stargate new season: Sept 11 by coyote-san · · Score: 2
    The syndicated Stargate season starts on September 11th. This is the fourth season, the fifth season started on Showtime over a month ago.

    No final decision has been made yet whether Showtime will pick up a 6th season.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:syndicated Stargate new season: Sept 11 by kevdog · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the cast has been told that they have been renewed for a 6th season. MGM just hasn't made a formal announcement, and it is not known if season 6 will be on Showtime.

      Check out this article.

      Also, it appears the feature film based upon Sg-1 will film after season 6. It was origionally planned to begin filming in October.

    2. Re:syndicated Stargate new season: Sept 11 by LordNimon · · Score: 2

      I heard a rumor that there are quite a number of people who subscribe to Showtime primarily, if not exclusively, because of Stargate: SG-1. I thought I was the only one who did that. I'd get Cinemax or HBO instead, if Showtime didn't have original sci-fi on it, and I think that's true of a lot of people. The great thing is that my TiVo allows me to get much more out of Showtime, because I don't have to worry about schedules.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    3. Re:syndicated Stargate new season: Sept 11 by tm2b · · Score: 1

      Folks do know that Stargate SG-1 is going to the Sci-Fi Channel, right?

      http://www.scifiguide.net/stargate/news/archive/00 0126_1.html

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  190. My picks by Angelwrath · · Score: 1

    The best Sci Fi on TV right now is clearly all the repeat runs of Star Trek, ST Next Generation and ST Voyager. And let's not forget the occasional Superstation presentation of Stallone in "Judge Dredd".... a stunning cinematic masterpiece, with Rob Schneider playing a wonderfully refreshing role as comic relief.

    The best sci fi not on TV right now is Robotech. Episodes can be found on Gnutella and Hotline, and are also available on DVD from the Robotech website, Robotech.com.

  191. Recently run (on UK TV).. (slightly off topic) by malkavian · · Score: 2

    Ok, this may be vaguely off the topic of currently running shows, though it's one to watch out for if they re-run it, or bother to get round to series 2..
    That's "Ultraviolet". It's well worth watching out for, although it's (in current form) just a 6 episode mini series.
    Keep the eyes peeled,

    Malk

    1. Re:Recently run (on UK TV).. (slightly off topic) by Celt · · Score: 1

      Yeah Ultraviolet was good alright, just a shame they haven't made a 2nd series.

      For those that don't know what it is, the basic theme is Vampires but its on a more series side.
      It treats the whole Vampires issue as more of a disease then a race.

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    2. Re:Recently run (on UK TV).. (slightly off topic) by tb3 · · Score: 2

      UV ran on SciFi channel in the US a couple of times. There won't be any more Ultraviolet, although there is someone working on a US version. Also, all of UV is available on a 2 disk DVD set, that I have on order right now.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

  192. The Outer Limits by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    IMHO, it's the best SciFi around these days.

    Before that, it was Sliders (though only the shows that had the original cast, and before they just started ripping off movie plots). I know on /. it's heresy to say this, but I find all the Star Trek derivatives to be completely unwatchable dreck. First Wave had me for a little while, but then they had to go and add Traci Lords to the cast as a cheap ratings ploy that reminded me of the "addition" of Kari Wuhrer to the Sliders cast. Like a pair of tits is going to keep me from noticing the show's getting hokey? I couldn't even bear the LEXX commercials. Farscape never really got its hooks into me.

    I've always been a huge fan of the Twilight Zone, and other shows of that particular genre of sci-fi, and The Outer Limits has taken up the thread quite admirably, with decent effects, familiar stars, and, oh yeah, interesting plots. They did an adaption of Larry Niven's "Inconstant Moon"-- a great story I had wanted to see on screen since I first read it. I'm still hoping they'll someday find a way to squeeze "Flash Crowd" into an hour.)

    The only time I really watch the SciFi Channel anymore is when they have one of those all-day Twilight Zone marathons, a good movie, or The Outer Limits.

    ~Philly

    1. Re:The Outer Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Farscape never really got its hooks into me.

      It will if you give it a chance.

    2. Re:The Outer Limits by Quickening · · Score: 1
      Oh, thank you, right on! I was freaking by everyone else's response. I guess the other garbage excuses for scifi mentioned here have to have an audience - and, surprise, they're slashdot readers! Outer Limits is more a scifi drama - but it does a decent job of cramming into an hour some of the IDEAS which make science fiction great.

      I've been hoping that all these great advances in computer graphics would enable more of the great stories of scifi to be recreated in film.

      Last series I saw that had potential was Crusade, and I beg the producers to bring it back.

      --
      tcboo
  193. Babylon 5, The tribe and SG-1... by penwing · · Score: 1

    have to be the best. I only just got into The Tribe (A World without adults). I got into B5 right at the end of it's run 8-( and SG-1 was only recently added to my list of viewables 8-).

  194. 10pm, you're getting wrong feed by coyote-san · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stargate SG-1 airs at 10 PM on the east and west coast feeds. Since my cable provider normally uses the east-coast feeds, I get it at 8 PM.

    If you're seeing it at midnight, you're either on a tape delay or in the CTZ but getting the west coast feed for some reason. Either way, you should complain to your cable provider.

    (If I had to guess, this is to "protect the children" from the nudity and sexual situations in their late-night programming. Heaven forbid we expect parents to monitor what their children are watching on TV in the late evening.)

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  195. Why I like Farscape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not feel very much like writing another small essay on Farscape, so I'll post something that I wrote for another thread, "What is the big deal about Farscape?" from the TrekBBS" (http://trekbbs.com/ubb/Forum11/HTML/003035.html) "Well, one of the things that keeps me glued to farscape is the fact that originality is not lacking. Every time I watch it, I try and look for the trademark scifi twists, and turns, and results, but they are not there! Farscape has, for three seasons, kept me amazed and wondering. Not only this, but the relationships between the characters feel so real that I can almost feel like I've been with them for the entire run. And few of them follow the stereotypical styles. They all have so many layers to them, and that is what makes them special. As for the muppets: They are wonderful, and again, make it unique. I always hear people complaining about trek's lack of "Realistic" aliens, with more than a simple bit of makeup. Well, this is how they solved the problem. The muppets do a perfect job with this, by giving you realistic and original aliens, and the scripts give you aliens who you can love or hate with passion. In a related matter, the costume and set design are (or should be) award winning. They generate a very deep, involving atmosphere that pulls you in and makes you watch in awe. The costumes are so amazingly detailed and original that you often see things you would have never expected. The music is another element of the show that really is quite good. While the show does use a lot of stock music, SubVision also composes more for certain episodes where necessary, generating a great, unique feel. There still is one problem that exists, though: The Arc makes it hard for casual viewers to follow. But don't fret! The farscape cast and crew put together yet another little "utility" that will help many. "Farscape: Undressed" This was a one hour special giving an overview of what happened throughout the first two seasons. It was VERY helpful to many I know who wanted to learn more, but didn't have the tapes. The show gave you a run down of all of the characters, their relationships, and their major encounters and developments, which really helped out quite a bit. Even to the hardcore viewer, it helped remember a few bits which may have faded out. This is why I, Sanfam, Like farscape. :-)" --END--

  196. Battlestar Galactica and Buck Rogers by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

    Erin Gray was hot. ( http://www.buck-rogers.com/film_and_series/gallery _wilma.htm )

    I guess my age is starting to show, isn't it.

  197. Some SciFi... by Falsch+Freiheit · · Score: 3, Insightful
    • Farscape; already mentioned by CmdrTaco, but this one is probably the best out there right now; and the muppets are done quite well.
    • Lexx; sucks, but seems to have improved a bit this season
    • Outer Limits; SciFi carries this, but it used to also show on CBS and Showtime. I think SciFi's run is ending. Individual 1-hour long stories that aren't connected. (okay, sometimes they're connected, and references to other episodes sometimes pop up) Quite good, sort of a "Twilight Zone" feel.
    • Earth: Final Conflict; been watching this on our local FOX affiliate. Quite good, actually. SciFi is starting a run of this from the beginning on Monday; I'll be watching, as I missed the beginning of the series.
    • Andromeda; this and EFC above are both based on ideas from Gene Roddenberry. Think "300 years after the Federation from Star Trek has fallen", except with enough things changed that it doesn't quite look like Star Trek and with a single ship that survived from that era (trapped next to a black hole) and her crew trying to rebuild the "Commonwealth". If only it didn't involve Kevin Sorbo...
    • Exposure; on SciFi, it's just independent short films; some are *very* well done.
    • Stargate SG-1; also playing on my local FOX affiliate, but originally from Showtime (new episodes are on Showtime, year later or so they end up on FOX); haven't been new episodes this summer, but this show is surprisingly good. *Far* better than the movie it's based on, except the special effects budget is smaller. Looking at the Showtime listing, they're still doing new ones, so I fully expect to see new-to-me ones on FOX starting again in the fall.
    • The Chronicle; just started on SciFi on Saturday nights; basic premise is they're the National Enquirer and all the stories (Zombie Maggots from Outer Space eat dog-girl's brain!) are real. Worth programming the VCR for; not worth staying home on Saturday night for.

    In fact, there's so much SciFi on TV these days that I can't keep up. There's also a "Witchblade" show on TNT (more Fantasy than SciFi) that's not bad. "Now and Again" is starting on SciFi on Monday; cancelled show from one of the major networks that I never saw, but I'm sure I'll check out a few episodes.
    1. Re:Some SciFi... by Khopesh · · Score: 2

      Outer Limits; SciFi carries this, but it used to also show on CBS and Showtime. I think SciFi's run is ending. Individual 1-hour long stories that aren't connected.

      There are two different "The Outer Limits." The recent one, which airs in Boston on CBS, and the classic black and white one. They are generally the same show with a ~20 year blip and would be my top pick here.

      Also of note, which nobody seems to have mentioned yet, is the X-Files. Sure, it sucks now, but it defined the genre. Before the X-Files, scifi was limited to Star Trek TNG.

      And don't forget Futurama, Red Dwarf, Sliders, and Star Trek: CBN (CowboyNeal). Hercules and Xena are fantasy, not scifi. ...And don't you DARE put Pokemon on.

      --
      Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  198. Red Dwarf by D_Gr8_BoB · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In my opinion, the best sci-fi show still in production is Red Dwarf. It's easily one of the funniest shows I've ever seen, and while the recent seasons (7-8) haven't been nearly as good as the show was at its peak (seasons 1-4), it's still very much worth watching.

    Those of you in the UK can look forward to a new season soon, and most of us in the US can catch reruns of the first 8 seasons on our local PBS station.

    1. Re:Red Dwarf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Red Dwarf went downhill as soon as Kochanski appeared, IMHO. The early series of Red Dwarf were fantastic and it also didn't help that one of the two show's creators left.

      They're making a Red Dwarf movie in case you didn't know, but it had better be well written, unlike the last few series...

    2. Re:Red Dwarf by vanye@home · · Score: 1


      How can you say the recent series aren't good? I defy anyone not to laugh at the expression on the T-Rex after it has just eaten cow vindaloo.

      Bringing back the ship has opened up a whole new set of story lines, the three batchelors in an apartment was starting to get a little stale.

      I can't wait for the movie.

      richard.

  199. Tv Media by Faizdog · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    The best Science Fiction on TV is how the Media manages to overlook important science related issues such as MS practices, Dimitri in Jail, and tries to pass of fiction as fact, and gets away with it.

    --
    -"Those who fought today will die tommorow."-
    1. Re:Tv Media by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      How are MS practices and Dimitri in Jail even remotely related to science?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  200. What about Buffy and Friends? by TheHaas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've waxed and waned on the SciFi channel - they have series that start good, but I just can't get into them. I do agree that Farscape is a lot better now than in the first seaon.

    And, though it technically isn't SciFi (more horror) what about "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and it's spin-of "Angel". Though I'm worred what UPN will do to it, Buffy has been the best written and the best acted show on TV, and Angel isn't far behind. The characters in those shows laugh, cry, and hurt. And, though it gets silly once in a while, it knows it's silly and just laughs at itself.

    Buffy is definitely the most "junvenile" of the two, though the themes it has discussed (sexuality, loss of a loved one) are biggies and they give it the weight that those themes deserve. Angel is more of an adult-oriented, with more of a Batman: The Animated Serie feel to it.

    Try it - you may like it!

    1. Re:What about Buffy and Friends? by Ender7A · · Score: 1

      Although I agree buffy is good, I can't help but feel that the show is showing its age. things that looked cute when she was playing a High School student looks kinda lame now that she is in college. Not to mention that they have done every conceivible thing they can possible do to her and her crew. I hope that when they go to upn, they will give her new and better material.

  201. LEXX meets Red Dwarf by SpiceWare · · Score: 2
    I loved P4X, the 3rd episode of the 4th season of LEXX. Craig Charles and Hattie Hayridge, Lister and the female Holly of Red Dwarf, starred as a married couple who where the wardens of the prison that Xev was taken to.

    The Official Red Dwarf site has a good interview with them about staring on LEXX - Prison Wardens.

  202. Re:The Invisible Man by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2
    ...probably one of the most underrated shows is The Invisible Man...
    I avoided this one for a while, but I've seen it a few times lately and have been very pleasantly surprised. If you haven't seen it, check it out.
    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  203. Space Ghost! Space Ghost! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How could you all forget Space Ghost Coast to Coast?

  204. you actually like lexx by EEE · · Score: 1

    Farscape is by far much better. The cinematography was by far much better than lexx. It compares with babylon 5 and even star trek. lexx is a show driven by sex. It's enjoyable but I prefer the content of a good sci-fi show. Plus the plots in farscape are much more interesting than anything lexx can dish out.

  205. B5 was king, what happend?!? by Sensei_knight · · Score: 1

    What happened to Excalaber(sp?). I rather disappoibted Sci-fi didn't pick thoes eps up the the bought the rights fot the whole saga. why i ask! And where are all thoes great CG machines now?

  206. whats against voyager? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only saw 1 maybe 2 episodes myself, and they seemed alright.. So what does everyone have against voyager?

  207. Farscape in Canada by rakerman · · Score: 1

    Good news: the Space channel will be running Farscape finally starting this fall. "Stay tuned for FARSCAPE on SPACE. Coming up Fall 2001 - Saturdays @ 2pm ET with a repeat Sundays @ 1pm ET."

    So when it is on again, it will qualify as the best SF on Canadian television.

    I've tried to get into Lexx (which is filmed in Halifax after all) but it doesn't do much for me - Andromeda neither (besides which the purple girl used to be Busy's friend, what's she doing in outer space?).

    Slightly off-topic, my votes for the best ever are Babylon 5 and Max Headroom.

  208. My Favories by Skeelo · · Score: 1

    Bear in mind I don't have cable but here are my favorites:

    1. Earth: Final Conflict
      This show started out very well and has lagged after about season 2 but has been interesting throughout. Go count up how many characters they've killed since the beginning... (www.efc.com)
    2. Stargate SG-1
      I've read the books, seen the movie, and I just can't get enough of this show or the series of books by Bill McCay.
    3. Dark Angel
      I can't believe I didn't see this in the comments. The plot is a little tired but I still find this to be an excellant show, mostly thanks to Jessica Alba.
    4. Roswell
      I don't know what it is but I am just hooked on this show.
    5. 7 Days
      Who wouldn't want to go back in time and save the world every week? (Besides it has a good dynamic between the characters.)
    6. The Invisible Man
      This show makes for some entertaining Saturday night viewing.
    7. Angel
      The characters make this show.
    8. Buffy: The Vampire Slayer
      Super powers and demons, generally good writing.
    9. Star Trek: The Next Generation
      Still better than Voyager at times.
    10. Star Trek: Voyager
      I think they ended this in a very unsatisfying way but I was bored long before it ended.
    11. Charmed
      Mystical powers just facinate me.
    12. Andromeda
      When I first heard about this my first thought was "Hercules in space." but I'll give credit where even the tiniest is due. I've been suprised by a few of the episodes.

    I'd also like to mention these shows:

    • Witchblade
      I want to see the series
    • Farscape
    • Lexx
    • Babylon 5
      I missed a big part of the story, but it was good
    • Space: Above and Beyond
      I only saw a few episodes but I liked the ones I saw
    • Star Trek: Deep Space Nine
      I miss the whole Bejoran/Kardasian/Federation/Dominion setting
    • M.A.N.T.I.S.
      Around the time when X-Files came out this was on at the same time, and was a cool show on it's own
    • X-Files
      Way back when, the stuff now really sucks
    • The Outer Limits
      Since this was on late on Sundays I hardly ever watched it but most of the stories I saw were very good
    1. Re:My Favories by JatTDB · · Score: 2

      Egad...7 days being on anyone's favorite list is just sad.

      I watched that show when they first started airing it. By the 5th time some horribly weird unknown complication with time travel rendered the hero [an amnesiac, hurt, whatever], I was sick of it. The reasons for going back were crappy, the constant fuckups of time travel were lame (and shouldn't have been relied upon to be so much of the plot), and the acting was just awful.

      --
      "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
  209. Lexx is ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if you thought Snidley Whiplash was a convincing bad guy. Or if you haven't been watching American tv long enough to realize that the chick with the balloon lips is not, repeat NOT going to get naked. Ever. After about the third episode the sneering German S&M villians got too predictable for me.

  210. Good and bad by CrackElf · · Score: 2

    Well, they are aiming for a different demographic in farscape, and personally I can not stand an idiot muscle brain frat boy portrayed as a scientist. The rest of the crew is all right, and the special effects are pretty good, but man that guy sucks as an actor and as a charachter. Lexx is pretty good, and odd, but a little shallow. The chronical shows some excellent camp humor potential. The invisible man is ok, but nothing special.

    As for non sci-fi channel sci-fi, witchblade is alright, but shows signs of degrading into the monotony of the highlander siries. Buffy was good for a while, but I think that it is past the haighpoint and is going down hill. The star treks have been washed up for me for a while. Of course my all time favorite is blakes 7, with doctor who as a second.
    -CrackElf

    --
    "Blake is an idealist, Jenna. He cannot afford to think." - Kerr Avon, Star One, Blakes 7
    1. Re:Good and bad by CrackElf · · Score: 1

      Err ... idiot frat boy is criten in farscape. Cut and past did not catch the entire comment.
      -CrackElf

      --
      "Blake is an idealist, Jenna. He cannot afford to think." - Kerr Avon, Star One, Blakes 7
    2. Re:Good and bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      personally I can not stand an idiot muscle brain frat boy portrayed as a scientist

      That quote says a lot more about you than it does about Farscape. I've lost count of the number of "idiot muscle brain frat boys" who wiped the floor with people who were too hung up on their loathing of "idiot muscle brain frat boys" to realize that the "idiot muscle brain frat boy" in question was actually smarter/faster/stronger/more ambitious/more talented then they were.

      Just because you are an ugly, weak, undernourished geek/nerd does not mean that you are smarter than everyone else!

      And where is it written that scientists have to be nerds who can't get dates? Remember, the Crichton in Farscape is not just a scientist: he is also an Astronaut. That is to say, a fly-boy, a jet-jockey: a jock. Are you saying fighter pilots are too stupid to be scientists?

      Plus, Crichton gets to bang Aeryn Sun (Claudia Black). Eat your hearts out, you jealous, pinched-lipped, hunched-shoulders, frat-boy hating nerds!

    3. Re:Good and bad by CrackElf · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Yes, you are a bad ass. Please post your name /addy. Did I mention that I was a punk (before I sold out and started working for the man)? That i ride a motorcyce? that my father was x-spc forces vietnam? that I can fight well with my hands, chains, a broken bottle, and just about anything else that I can get my hands on. That I work out at the dojo 3-4 times a week (a dojo roughly corrolates to a gym for martial artists, except that it is mental as well as physical). Just because muscle heads believe that they are 'smarter/faster/stronger/more ambitious/more talented' does not make it so.

      Not exactly the 'ugly, weak, undernourished geek/nerd' that you portray is it? Intelligence, lack of a frat membership, and not using steroids does not, in fact corrolate to unambitios, stupid, slow, weak, and a lack of talent. In fact it usually implies the opposite. I despise ignorance and stupidity, both of which you appear to have in abundance. As does Crichton.

      Only a fool picks a fight without knowing his/her opponent. And you obviously do not know me.

      -CrackElf

      --
      "Blake is an idealist, Jenna. He cannot afford to think." - Kerr Avon, Star One, Blakes 7
    4. Re:Good and bad by Charm · · Score: 1
      And a smart fighter knows never to pick a fight or get in one either. When I was taught Kung-Fu the emphasis was on avoiding the situation but still being prepared for combat.

      As for my favorite shows

      Farscape If they ever show it again in Australia

      SG-SG1 Not too bad

      Dark Angel She kicks ass but I've only seen three episodes so far

      Strange World Though it was killed off

      Crusade Also killed off though I'm more annoyed at this one. Especially as I have seen almost all of babylon five and the movies.

      Space Above and Beyond Never saw the whole lot but it was cool.

      But frankly I think most Sci-Fi is cool wether it's written, read or on TV or the movies.

      --
      -- RTFM:Slackware::Beer:Saturday
    5. Re:Good and bad by CrackElf · · Score: 2

      True. Although I would amend that. If the consequenses of not fighting are someone else getting hurt (ie: ignoring a rape) I will fight. I have never been in a fight where I could obtain my objective without violence. The times that I have gotten into a fight, it was either with drunken meat head frat boys who wanted to prove something by beating up a punk or when I was defending someone weaker than myself (also usualy from frat boys / meat heads).

      The point was that being a geek/nerd does not preclude the ability to defend oneself or have a life. I believe that my point was made.

      As for sci fi, farscape would be good if the killed off the main character, sg-sg1 is pretty cool. Dark Angle is good except for the acting by the main character. Strange World? never heard of it. Crusede, is that a bab 5 movie? Space above and beyond was good for a while, but they went stagnent and started rerunning plots.

      Oh, yes, and i did forget to mention red dwarf in my original post.
      -CrackElf

      --
      "Blake is an idealist, Jenna. He cannot afford to think." - Kerr Avon, Star One, Blakes 7
    6. Re:Good and bad by CrackElf · · Score: 2

      Get a nick. they are free. I am quite willing to debate anything that I put forth on this board, but I would appreciate at least the continuity of a nick. If you dont want to debate and just want to flame, then this is kind of a pointless thread anyway. And, your over use of dramatic extremist statements without factual (even anecdotal) evidence errodes rather then supports your arguments.

      Gee. You sound really tough.
      I mean. You're Dad is all special forces. He must be able to beat up my dad. And you ride a motorcycle, which means you must be extremely masculine. I feel so weak now.


      (if you are the same poster) the point was that I am not the 'ugly, weak, undernourished geek/nerd' that was portrayed by the first (same?) ac. The idea is to try to broaden the first ac's (your?) obviously limited experience with the world. And actually my dad did beat on a number of things and was a prime example of the kind of mentality that I despise. The very reason that I moved out in middle school.

      And you use really arcane words like dojo . Obviously you spend a lot of time working on your mental training. It really shows in your post. You must spend a lot of time meditating on how you can use "my hands, chains, a broken bottle, and just about anything else that I can get my hands on" to beat up anyone who you might think is a "muscle head".

      Err ... dojo is not arcane. It is the name for it. I did not say that I "beat up anyone who you might think is a "muscle head"." The implication was that I used my physical abilities to defend myself, and that those that attacked were usually 'muscle heads' out looking to either a) prove themselves, or b) beat up someone who they thought was weaker than themselves. The use of chains and bottles and hands were not by my choice. It was always out of self defense. I did not learn these things in a dojo. I am in a dojo now because I find it to keep me in better mental and physical shape.

      You seem to like to stereotype.
      As do you if you are the original ac.

      There are two groups: Like-Me and Not-Like-Me. You'd be hard pressed to fit me into either. But when in doubt, you'd best just hate me, call me stupid and lump me with the frat boys you so adamantly hate.
      I ridicule fraternities as much as the next geek, but I am mature enough to realize that not all guys in fraternities are frat-guys. And that not all atheletes are steroid popping idiots, and that many people in the military are actually intelligent.

      Now that sad. You generalize about me generalizing. Do you see the irony? do you? Yes, i generalize. And that is inherently incorrect, as not all people of a given group will fit into a stereotype excepting the situation that they are grouped by the attribute that you are stereotyping (eg: bodybuilders are muscular ... at least the ones that succeed at building their body). However the generalization of 'meat head' is a grouping of ppl that share the common characteristic of the 'might makes right' mindset. I have always been of the view that right is right, and it is the duty of those that have might to protect those that do not.

      As for frat boys, i have known a half dozen or maybe a dozen out of the hundreds that I have met that I consider all right. However, those are few and far between, and are most definitely the exception and not the rule. What I usually observe, to a greater or lesser degree, is that those that join a frat tend to be of the gang mentality, with out even the meager excuse of having a hard life. In fact I have noticed that people that are otherwise all right will act in ways that they profess to dislike when with their 'brothers'.

      Athletes and steroids? I do not recall saying that all athletes were steroid abusers. And correct me if I am wrong, but steroids tend to alter the emotional state of a person taking them, and those most likely to take them are people with that mental state in the first place.

      There are intelligent people in the military. However, it is a known fact (and the intelligent ppl in the military often draw the same conclusion) that the military indoctrinates and brainwashes its members to be able to kill and live with it. That is what they are for. If they could not do these things it would be a pretty ineffective military, would it not? (and i do not recall generalizing about the military, although I might have)

      I wish I could tell you the world is as simple as you want it to be. Its easier for you to think about that way. Less complicated. You dont have to actually talk to anyone. In high school, I could have been mistaken for a jock. Now that is a long time ago, but I still don't look like a stereotypical coder.

      You know nothing about what I want. You assume that I am attacking you. I am attacking a mindset that i consider negative. If you have that mindset, than yes, I am attacking you. To paraphrase dune, I put forth a general garment, and you proclaim that it was unjustly tailored to you? If you are a frat boy who does not fit the stereotype and does not want to be associated with it, then get out there and change what (most) frat boys do. Take care of your own.

      Well, wake up, you childish idiot. You hate stupidity? Well, there is always going to be someone smarter than both you and I. Intelligence isn't linear, like you simple mind comprehends it. Just like the world can't be split into frat-boys and geeks, you cannot seperate smart from dumb.

      Childish? ye who ac's me? There is a mentality that is common to most frat boys, that I despise. It is very similar to the mentality of gangs. It is one that glorifies going with the crowd, excluding and harming those that are different, one that looks down upon individuality, that includes living selfishly without care for the harm that it inflicts on others, and that has caused harm to many that I have personally known that never chose partake of that lifestyle.

      As you most diligently pointed out, the world is not black and white, not even gray, as even morality and spirituality are varied on the individual level. I would go farther and say that the world of people is even deeper than the complexity of the full spectrum of light. However there are some things that I do not approve of that harm those that I like, that are propagated (most often) by people of a particular mindset, and from a particular background. The mindset is that of the machismo alfa male trying to prove themselves. The most common background is that of the fraternal society. I have seen evidence of this society (frat boys) condoning and even encouraging such behavior. From the very simple observation that the high occurrences of such behavior would likely not occur if it not condoned and encouraged to personal observations of contradictory behavior of individuals varying with the presence of other frat boys.

      If you would have watched the show more than one episode, you would realize that Crichton often seeks to do things with as little force as necessary. Something you might think of next time you have to save a girl from a drooling frat boy.

      Again with the assumptions. Actually, I liked the premise, and watched two seasons of it or so. And he has advocated unnecessary revenge and violence on more than one occasion, which, being unnecessary, is not 'as little force as necessary'. You missed the point that I am trying to make, which is that he acts like an immature person who has a serious alfa male complex and does not approach even scientific issues with a scientific mindset. His actions most often remind me of a immature frat boy who is out to prove to the world that he is bad ass shit, and has not learned that he is not, in fact, the center of the universe. I do not find him to be a believable scientist. I would take it better if the premise of the show did not revolve around him being something that he is so obviously not.

      As for the amount of violence that I use to gain my objective in a given situation, you will more than likely never know, as it is unlikely that we will ever meet outside of this online debate.
      -CrackElf

      PS: please dont ac, if you have something to say, at least get a throw away nick to do it. AC'ing is rather annoying.

      --
      "Blake is an idealist, Jenna. He cannot afford to think." - Kerr Avon, Star One, Blakes 7
  211. RedDwarf by noerej · · Score: 1

    I dont like most SciFi.
    Too many are only violent, to much science 'Whe invent a atomic particle once every minute', to
    much a military organisation with s.m. like uniforms or 'stupid enough I only encounter more avanced people, who wants to kill me'.
    But the best SciFi is RedDwarf.
    Second best is Microsoft windows 3000, Opensource edition. ... No not realy I dont care.

  212. First Wave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only started watching it because it was on straight before Stargate, and I thought it was rather stupid when it started. But after a while I started enjoying it.

    Definitly not the best Sci-Fi on TV (B5 hold that, Farscape not far behind), but it's good fun and that's all anyone can ask for :D

    ---------
    FrostedWheat

  213. No contest - Farscape wins over any Trek by YanIsa · · Score: 1
    Hello,

    I am a trekkie (watched every ep of tng and voy several times, front row center on trek movie premieres, lacking the uniform though) and I've watched Quantum Leap, B5, SG-1, SAAB and other SF shows, so I thought I knew what good SF show is like. Soon after Voyager ended, I saw a .sig right here that said something like "Farscape - the best antidote to ST:Voyager". As I found myself with free evenings due to lack of trek, I got me a few eps, started watching it and - was blown away.

    I've been pretty jaded with Trek for a while lately. True, most episodes were cool and some were great, but the script format has practically never changed (twist the story as much as you can in the first few minutes, wait, and in the last five minutes put everything back together (X never really died, planet Y is saved, Voyager defeats attackers, the Borg unexpectedly retreat, the crew are resurrected due to lucky timetravel stunt).

    I found myself.. wanting more. And more I got.

    Farscape has an atypical human hero, smart and witty dialogue, great stories and guts to go where Viacom dares not thread - whether it's a bare behind of a female cast member or an alien farting helium, main hero popping magic mushrooms or lead lady looking at a woman and exclaiming: "She gives me a woody!"

    I still like Trek, don't get me wrong. But if i had to choose only one set of DVD's to keep me company on a lonely starship, I know what I'll take.

    Oh, and many thanks to the guy/gal with the Farscape .sig. You changed my opinion of SF on TV and provided me with many hours of enjoyment (although not at the end of 3x15).

    Yan

    Gilina: "I can't believe you're not Sebacean."
    John: "Human. It's kinda like Sebacean, but we haven't conquered other worlds yet, so we just kick the crap out of each other."

    Farscape, PK Tech Girl

    --
    I think this line's only filler
  214. West Wing by DanMcS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, not strictly sci fi, but this is the best-written show, ever. It does occur in an alternate universe where the president is a different person, so that might sneak it in to the very border of SciFi-ness. Ok, probably not, but don't limit yourself to scifi, there is some excellent television floating around. Not much, but it's there.

    --
    Communication is only possible between equals
    1. Re:West Wing by blair1q · · Score: 2

      It does occur in an alternate universe where the president is a different person, so that might sneak it in to the very border of SciFi-ness. Ok, probably not, but don't limit yourself to scifi,

      Nope. It counts, and not just for the alternate universe-ness.

      They've shows have featured meteorology, cartography, air-traffic control, security technology, e-mail instability, crude-oil transport, and ichthyology (goldfish).

      There was supposed to be a scene in the finale this year of some of them standing in front of the Einstein statue at NIST, but it got cut for time.

      The West Wing is science fiction.

      --Blair

    2. Re:West Wing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly qualifies as fantasy ... *sigh*

    3. Re:West Wing by mbourgon · · Score: 2
      Nope. Doesn't count. Sure the writing is good, but it's not Sci-Fi. Fantasy, sure, especially with the political leanings. But they're talking about Sci-Fi. Why was this modded up again? Come on, Urkel is probably sci-fi since no-one that annoying could exist naturally. Sorry, he's in an "alternate universe" where he's annoying (and no bringing up the "Alternate Urkel episodes. or that I know about them). Doesn't make it sci-fi.

      Good Sci-Fi
      • Farscape (awesome)
      • Invisible Man(great and hilarious)
      • New Adventures of Jules Verne (not great, just good, but has potential)
      • The Chronicle(I hope it stays this good)
      • Dark Angel (love that cliffhanger ending, especially since no-one knew if it was getting renewed or not)
      • Buffy (like I need to say anything?)


      And of course, this fall, the new B5 show. Which, unlike the new Star Trek, will definitely not suck. (I hope the new Star Trek doesn't suck, but I'm not getting that vibe. Someone fire Berman)
      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    4. Re:West Wing by Pseudonym · · Score: 2

      Tell me about it. *sigh*

      Any chance of getting Martin Sheen elected?

      Actually, how about Aaron Sorkin? He knows how to do the job (having written both The American President and The West Wing), his characters are more fair-minded than any real politician, he's an alcoholic with a DWI conviction... Almost overqualified.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    5. Re:West Wing by dsplat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My VCR current records Farscape, Andromeda, Witchblade, and West Wing. As I have said in other comments, I really like good characters. The characters on West Wing are some of the best I've ever seen. At their high points, all of the best SF series hit the intensity and wit that these guys hit nearly every week.

      I don't watch or read much fiction other than SF. There's so much good SF, and so little time. But there are exceptions. ER and West Wing jump to mind immediately. I wouldn't call, West Wing SF, but I wouldn't hesitate to recommend it.

      --
      The net will not be what we demand, but what we make it. Build it well.
  215. Different genre, but a definite best: Nero Wolfe. by Rahga · · Score: 2

    A&E started running a mystery series based on books by Rex Stout called "Nero Wolfe". No, it's not sci-fi, but it stars an 'genius that's just a little excentric', dated a few decades back when more people had class and men wore hats.

    You've got to love a guy who takes "Webster's New International Dictionary, Unabridged, Third Edition", rips out each page of it one at a time, and tosses them into the fireplace because the book threatens the integrity of the english language.

    Anyways, A&E is currently shifting around the show right now and it doesn't have a solid time slot (they overplayed the first batch of episodes), but it's been playing and probably will continue it's run on Saturday nights. But of course, there's also the original books in a library near you.

  216. Invisible Man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the two best SCI FI series on TV now are Invisible Man and First Wave. Buffy is also my biggest favorite.

  217. Re:Ahem.. Blake's 7? by radja · · Score: 2

    There have been some quite strong rumours about a coming Blake's 7 movie. (google rocks :)

    //rdj

    --

    No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
    --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
  218. CLEOPATRA 2525!@# by Repvblic · · Score: 2, Funny

    IN THE YEAR 2525
    THERE ARE WOMEN WITH THE WILL TO SURVIVE
    FIGHTING FOR A BRAND NEW DAY
    NOTHING'S GONNA GET IN THEIR WAY

    ...

    Christ, I'm so sorry. I don't know what overcame me. Oh yeah, the character Sarge gives me wood. that's what it was. Bad TV show, bad acting, nice abs. Now it's cancelled. I hope. It disappeared off local TV like an indicted infomercial king.

    1. Re:CLEOPATRA 2525!@# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes ... real cheese ... very watchable with chemical support.

  219. Re:Interzone -- Best Sci Fci Currently on Televisi by Bj�rn · · Score: 1

    I agree with everything you wrote about SF magazines and the importance of the short story in SF. Just a minor point though. The movie Blade Runner is based (loosely) on a Philip K. Dick novel, not a short story, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep. Total Recall is based on a Philip K. Dick short story though.

    --
    Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think. --Niels Bohr
  220. Invader Zim! by yellowstone · · Score: 2
    Nickelodeon has a (relatively) new cartoon called "Invader Zim". It's definitely a hoot.

    Two downsides, though:

    1. It's on at the same time as Farscape (but that's why God invented VCRs & Tivo)
    2. So far, there's only 6 half-hour episodes
    Mrs Bitters: Zim, the machine says the only job you're suited for is --
    Zim: Yes, yes -- LORD OF HUMANS!! I will rule you all with an iron fist!
    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    1. Re:Invader Zim! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Don't avoid this one just because you think it's a Nicktoon like Rugrats. This show is aimed at adults. The "NanoZim", "Parent-Teacher Night" and "Battle Dib" eps. are priceless!

      Invader's blood marches through my veins like giant radioactive rubber pants! The pants command me! Do not ignore my veins!

  221. If there's no good SF on tv, how anout the net? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that since Troops fan films have been popping up like flies and maybe soon we actually can get to a point where free online productions can compete with real shows. Everybody knows http://www.theforce.net/theater/ with it's Star Wars films, but there's also a alternative Star Trek called Hidden Frontier at http://www.hiddenfrontier.com . Though the quality leaves a lot to be desired, but they're actually a series, a new episode pops up every two or three months. Even more alternative is Star Wreck http://starwreck.peliportti.net a Finnish Trek parody series with 6 movies. It's actually pretty good and certainly different.

  222. Re:Ahem.. Blake's 7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Thank you for mentioning Blake's 7, an undeservedly obscure series. It was shown a lot on PBS here in the USA back in the mid-1980's.

    Blake's 7 reminds me most of Farscape: both have ships run by escaped prisoners, both have lots of personality conflicts and conflicts over group vs. individual loyalty. The Federation in B7 is far more sinister and totalitarian than Farscape's Peacekeepers - who are nasty, but are simply a free-lance military police state "for hire" that does not aspire to run everyone's lives and turn them into drug-enslaved zombies (as was the case with B7's Federation). Must admit, though, President Servalan (sp?) was pretty hot.

  223. Earth Finial Conflict by barureddy · · Score: 1

    Earth Final Conflict is by far the best science fiction series out there today. Earth Final Conflict isn't just your average star trek created by Gene Rodenberry, but it is a story with an complex plot line dealing with humanity, morality, love, hate, perfection, survival, and many more themes. Each episode has a spark of magic in it that I haven't seen since Star Trek: The Next Generation. Any way watch it and you won't regret it. It is now starting to come on SF channel (I love this channel) Mon-Thur at 9/8 central.

  224. Voyager doesn't suck! by bluephone · · Score: 1
    I fully expect to get modded down for this, but someone has to say it.

    Voyager does NOT suck! Sure, there were some crappy episodes. There were also some crappy episodes of Dr. Who! Some people happen to think Stra Wars sucks too. Just because YOU may not like a show does not mean it's to blame for a dearth of good SciFi on TV. For that, blame TV execs. Afer all, THEY are the ones who first canceled the original Star Trek, only to find out the next year (via a revised Neilsen Ratings system) that they were hitting the exact market demographic they wanted. For the crappy Voyager episodes (and the less than ideal finale) blame Brannon Braga and Rick Berman (primarily Braga).

    Star Trek is often the whipping post of scifi diehards. But corner most of them and they'll admit they either STILL love it, or that at least they got their start on a steady diet of Star Trek.

    Responding to the main topic though, Farscape is indeed the pinnacle of new SciFi right now. 6 months ago I'd have tied it with Voyager, but since Voyager is no longer running new episodes, Farscape wins. :)

    I must admit though, I'm glad to be rid of Zhaan. She was way too sotto voce for me.

    --
    jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
  225. CNN by jessemckinney · · Score: 1

    Have you seen those robots on CNN? That is really scary. They win my vote. ;-)

  226. Farscape is OK, but there's nothing "great" now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Farscape is OK, but the Rigel puppet is just a character I'd rather they didn't have, because it panders to UK TV execs concept that all sci-fi is for kids.

    In the UK, TV stations virtually all show utter contempt for sci-fi - they deliberately air it in kids' slots (6.00pm or 6.45pm is the favourite time, often on a Monday or Wednesday) and then use that as an excuse to cut it (or in the case of ST:TNG "The Higher Ground" episode, actually ban it completely !).

    Personally, I watch "Farscape" (knock out Rigel and I'd give it a "very good" rating, but it's only good in my books), "Earth: Final Conflict" (OK), "ST:Voyager" (poor, but I've watched all the ST stuff - old habits die hard), "Futurama" (excellent, though recent episodes weren't as good as the earlier ones - it's at its best when the story revolves around Bender, easily the funniest character), "Lexx" (early series good, but it's not as good now, IMHO - that rubbish about "Fire" and "Water" planets wrecked about a half of a series !) "First Wave" (still managing to hold my interest - the addition of Traci Lords helped :-) ) and "Buffy" (the last series was quite poor, IMHO).

    What's quite depressing is the almost complete lack of UK sci-fi that's been produced in recent years. Doctor Who stopped in 1989 (mind you, I hated Sylvester McCoy and the crass storylines he was involved in), Red Dwarf (a comedy, yes, but the major UK sci-fi presence in the 90's) has gone waaaaay downhill in recent series and whilst there's been some kid's sci-fi (including a poor remake of "The Tomorrow People"), I fear that the best of UK sci-fi died in the 70's and 80's (Space 1999, UFO, Blake's 7, Doctor Who and Star Cops as a few of the examples).

    1. Re:Farscape is OK, but there's nothing "great" now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Farscape is OK, but the Rigel puppet is just a character I'd rather they didn't have, because it panders to UK TV execs concept that all sci-fi is for kids.

      The problem is not with Rygel, who is a wonderful character, precisely because he is mean and nasty and definitely not for the kids (btw, that's Rygel, not Rigel).

      The problem is with your UK TV execs. Might I suggest that they be shot? Or has Big Brother, aka Tone Blare, confiscated all your guns?

  227. And the winners are ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) B5 way out in front (no contest -- superb) The writing for B5 was so good that it made the performances of the cast some of the best in SciFi television history. followed by ... 2) SG-1 (what a kick ass plot device did a stargate turn out to be!) 3) Earth Final Conflict (its just cool) Trailing a ways behind is ... 4) Farscape (if it were not so melodramatic it would rate higher -- I can only take so much whining ... can we say "The Real World in Space") and lastly ... 5) Voyager, Andromeda, Lexx, Sliders etc... (these are sometimes good but often really bad) Lexx would rank higher if it were not so predictably childish and therefore boring. I guess you need to be college age or younger to really "appreciate" it ... and then you grow up. Voyager is too episodic and often laughably idiotic. Andromeda wants to be good but it isn't there yet. -- JMHO

    1. Re:And the winners are ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      4) Farscape (if it were not so melodramatic it would rate higher -- I can only take so much whining ... can we say "The Real World in Space")

      Ugh! Boot to the head for you! Most boneheaded comment ever.

      The writing for Farscape is easily as good as the writing for Babylon 5.

  228. Ok here's my two cents (especially about Lexx) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off a little about Lexx, for those who are bashing Lexx.. you have to see the first two seasons first. They are far better than the last two (especially the current season). Some of you are saying.. 4 seasons.. where.. what.. The first season of Lexx consisted of 4 movie length shows (with a different Xev.. actually called Zev :) The "movies" are(I think in correct order): I Worship His Shadow, Eating Pattern (with Rutger Hauer), Tales from a Parallel Universe (with Time Curry), and Gigashadow (with Malcolm McDowell). They are a lot more serious and edgy and explain so much.. plus they cover mostly main plot (with the exception of Eating Pattern which I'm not big on). Also a note about Lexx "BRING BACK LYEKA" I don't care how. :)

    As for Best TV Scifi in general, good scifi on tv in no particular order:
    Farscape - It's all about the characters baby. Effects aren't too bad either.. using a wormhole to eject part of a sun at a ship (a recent episode in the US).. hehe cool
    Lexx - falling fast but still in there
    Earth 2 - gone now but I liked it... I may be the only one.
    Millenium - not strictly scifi.. and wanders a bit but I love the feel and Frank Black is too cool
    American gothic - once again more fantasy but great atmosphere.. "Someone's at the door"
    Chronicle - I'm all over this show.. they need to shore up some of the relationships but still cool.
    Freakylinks - cancelled dammit.. I was starting to like the characters.. and wanted to know about the whole big bad whatever out there..
    Babylon 5 - amazing.. truly... but I just can't watch it again.. it's over now..
    Futurama- "I guess I can get rid of one doomsday device and still be feared.." :)
    Red Dwarf- seasons 1-4 were hilarious, after that it was downhill.. now it's embarassing.. :( "Go to Red Alert. Are you sure? It would mean changing the bulb."

    Alan

  229. Of course there is... by Linegod · · Score: 1

    Andromeda. You humps.

    --
    -- I care not for your foolish signatures.
  230. ST:TNG and Red Dwarf by Nevrar · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'm not saying I watched all the episodes, but in general I find that Star Trek: The Next Generation holds my attention the best. (Voyager doesn't even come close - it is sooooo trashy).

    Lexx is just boring.

    And yeah, if Red Dwarf counts as sci fi (i'd classify it as comedy myself), then that definitely rates up the top... :)

    --
    Nevrar
    1. Re:ST:TNG and Red Dwarf by philipm · · Score: 0

      Oh come on, stop living in the past, TNG is so out. Farscape is for losers also. Some "astronaut" guy stumbles around and has flashbacks because there is a "bad" him in his head for how many seasons now? Farscape has completely no plot. Lexx is the show that all of those in the know watch. The plots are amazing and relevant. And it has real sci-fi and not farscape pretty colors sci fi.

    2. Re:ST:TNG and Red Dwarf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh come on, stop living in the past, TNG is so out. Farscape is for losers also. Some "astronaut" guy stumbles around and has flashbacks because there is a "bad" him in his head for how many seasons now? Farscape has completely no plot. Lexx is the show that all of those in the know watch. The plots are amazing and relevant. And it has real sci-fi and not farscape pretty colors sci fi.

      You, sir, are a blithering idiot.

      No; I take that back. That was an inaccurate assessment. Let me try again.

      You, sir, are a drooling moron.

      There. Much better.

  231. Re:The simple algorithm to determine good SF/TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes, Harlan Ellison wrote some of the best episodes in ST:TOS and he was a conceptual consultant of some kind for Babylon 5.

    Unfortunately, re: Lathe of Heaven, my copy of the DVD says that they lost the original film, so they had to reconstruct the DVD from aging video tape stored at a TV station somewhere. The video and audio quality is rather muddy, to say the least: the quality for a made for TV movie of that era was not high to begin with, and in spite of valiant efforts, the DVD is very disappointing in spite of the excellent story, due to the bad video quality.

  232. hands down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has to be a tie between red dwarf and andromeda depending on the mood.

  233. Re:West Wing [OT] by cybermage · · Score: 1

    If you like West Wing, you should watch Sports Night (re-running on Comedy Central). The show was done by the same team before they started West Wing. The dialog has the same rapid-fire, sharp accuracy. It's not as polished, but the funny stuff, on average, is WAY funnier.

  234. Best show on SciFi channel by Maddx · · Score: 1

    I absolutely love Farscape, but for a more dark serious show check out Firstwave. It is by far my favorite show on TV. Its got everything.. paranoia, conspiracy, and aliens. The main characters are great, a paranoid hacker, and an ex thief. The third season is airing right now in the us. Check it out. http://www.scifi.com/firstwave/

  235. first season sucked by H310iSe · · Score: 1
    NO way. The first season of Farscape was *amazing* as in 'I can't believe this is on television' but not in a Fox special when pidgeons attack kinda way. Seriously, the story lines weren't as fragmented and complex as they are now (you can't get through an episode without 3 different expositions on 4 different story threads - bad episodic form, unless you're making a telenovela). The take on traditional TV values was refreshing (and _very_ adult I might add). For example, I don't know, honestly, if this was the first or second season but it's a good example of the first season regardless, the cave of youthful surfer-stoners. OK not only does the show portray drugs as less-than-total-evil(think Beverly Hills 902blahblah exctacy episode) but in the end the snake-girl (who even my most died-in-the-wool-homosexual friends think is insanely sexy) decides she want to do the suicide jump all the kids do, and they let her, because they know it's just something she has to work out on her own, and will, eventually, if not now, next opportunity. This kind of anti-stereotypical-morality is more than refreshing, it's downright ... well, as I said, amazing. Check the first season again, you might be surprised if you just pay attention to the subtext a little more....

    As always, IMHO

    --
    closed minded is as closed minded does
  236. Farscape by kireK · · Score: 1

    Def the best SciFi on the little screen.

  237. Farscape, Yes, Lexx, Yes... by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    I like Farscape. Apart from the damn good writing and story lines that address moral issues that Star Trek wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, they have that white chick. Woah... That white chick... drool... She makes that Voyager borgette look like Rosanne Barr.

    I don't find a whole lot of character in any of the characters in Lexx. The only main character who doesn't seem completely flat is Kai (And he's DEAD!) I do derive a fair amount of sadistic pleasure in watching the writers torment Stanley and any show that has two freaking seasons of Nigel Bennett as the bad guy has got to be good.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Farscape, Yes, Lexx, Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I like Farscape. Apart from the damn good writing and story lines that address moral issues that Star Trek wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole, they have that white chick. Woah... That white chick... drool... She makes that Voyager borgette look like Rosanne Barr.

      You mean that "grey chick" (Chiana). Actually Chiana is kind of white, but it is a white that is almost gray (grey?). Chiana is played by Gigi Edgley, who is prety damn hot out of makeup, as well. Here's a website with some pics (this is a legit link; AC's honor):

      http://www.gigiedgley.com/

      The real "white chick" (you know what I mean) on Farscape is Aeryn Sun (Claudia Black) who I think is the hottest chick in Farscape (at least, the hottest one not under a ton of special effects makeup). Claudia Black is captivating on camera. Her face gets more and more interesting. Just watch her. You will see what I mean.

      Well, I might as well include a link to one of the Claudia Black fan sites, too:

      http://ukculttv.tripod.com/claudiablack.htm

    2. Re:Farscape, Yes, Lexx, Yes... by Greyfox · · Score: 2

      Yeah! Chiana! Sun is too butch for my taste.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    3. Re:Farscape, Yes, Lexx, Yes... by unitron · · Score: 2

      Didn't Forever Knight have Nigel Bennett as the bad guy every season?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  238. Re:Space, Above and Beyond, Fuck yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    SAB was in a murderous timeslot, which is whay I guess no one payed it any attention. It was more Rat Patrol than Star Trek and that's what made it fun to watch because you, lo and behold, actually started to *care* about what was going to happen to the characters (unlike Trek where redshirts get picked off left and right in a predictable manner).

    The Chiggy Von Richtofen two parter was some of the best hard SF I've yet seen on TV.

    Abandon All Hope

  239. Just curious, does.. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Mobile Suit Gundam count? It's OBVIOUSLY science fiction, and it's on cable TV, why not?

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  240. YES! by INANE · · Score: 1

    Invis man is a show I've watched sine it first came on the air, and you are right it is an EXCELENT show!

    --
    -- "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so.
  241. What about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "THE IMMORTAL" with Lorenzo Lame-ass. God damn that is a terrible show. It's the kind of show people can point to when they say "see, sci-fi tv sucks!"

    Personally I think Andromeda is great.

    1. Re:What about by unitron · · Score: 2
      I was wondering if anyone was going to mention that show. I'd seen it in the listings and assumed that it was a remake of the old Christopher George show. Then I saw the last few minutes of an episode a couple of nights ago. Apparently it's a remake of Highlander. Too bad, the former could be a pretty good show re-set some 30 to 40 years later.

      At least Lamas is finally getting enough age in his face that he can play more interesting characters than pouty stud pretty boy if someone will write something decent for him.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  242. Does Anyone Remember Jason of Star Command? by zeppelin71 · · Score: 1

    It was an early 80's Saturday Morning thing. I don't remember too much about it - except I seem to recall that "Jason" was being chased by beautiful women from starship to starship. Sigh... life hasn't turned out the way I hoped.

  243. You are SO right by INANE · · Score: 1

    Excelent way to describe the show. There has never been ANYTHING on TV that can even touch B5, and I'm talking everything not just sci-fi shows.

    --
    -- "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant: It's just that they know so much that isn't so.
  244. Farscapes cool but... by nemof · · Score: 1

    But I still dream of Shadow ships. B5 was a golden age of sci-fi for me. Season four is the best season of science-fiction ever portrayed on TV. It just had everything, it was space Opera on the grandest scale possible and stretched my understanding of science fiction and what you could do with it. I got the same feeling from Bestor's 'Tiger Tiger' or Noon's 'Vurt'. Yes, season five blew and the Drak were pathetic, but even at it's worst season five was better than the best episode of White Crusade, which I felt embaressed what B5 had been about. Farscape I have to admit is brilliant TV. Sometimes it just has me cracking up, I mean a little green alien guy in a gimp suit is a sight to behold. Lexx has always rocked, but the latest series (3 i think) is nowhere as entertaining as the previous. They're using a different type of film or speed or something, but it looks like a TV documentery. It was much more fun at the end of series one and beginning of series 2. The mantrid storyline rocked, especially near the end when the hole the dark universe is created. Dont like the latest Zev though. In the latest series you see nudity (as far as I can think) which may seem like a stupid thing to point out but in the first and second series they didn't need to rely on titilation because everything else was just so wyrd.

    --
    -nemof
    "I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by."
  245. Lexx's Writing is what makes it so good... by Trinity-Infinity · · Score: 1

    Lexx is the best series out there since they started a particular style with season 2 - using a whole complete season of 20+ episodes to tell a story arc, much like the time tested methods of afternoon soap operas. Miss one episode, and you're a bit behind. Miss several, and you're clueless. But keep up, and you'll find a richer, deeper kind of storytelling than you'll find on any other show - be it american, german, australian, whoever!

    Kudos to the folks at Salter Street producing and writing Lexx. This season is already shaping up to look as good as the last one, with the Earth being ground zero in some kind of fundamental battle as the Fire/Water planets were last season. As a side note to those following the show so far - any clue what those robot things are that crawled up Lister and the cat's behinds?

  246. Re:Best Sci-Fi on TV by stayler · · Score: 1

    Farscape is definitely the Best Sci-Fi on TV today. I am still a big B5 fan and have the whole thing on VHS but Farscape has beaten it out of first place with me. As a side note, Claudia Black and Gigi Edgley are definitely the hottest Space Babes ever..... stayler

  247. Nikita -- Without a Doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has to be the best science fiction on television -- it is unlike anything else showing. It has more of a noir, cloak and dagger feel to it, but I'd say it contains enough elements (psyonic ops in one episode) to warrant the classification.

    This is a don't-disappoint show that combines an awesome but not overdone storyline with kickass suspense and demonstration of some crazy tech.

    Now only if they had it out on DVD.

  248. Stargate SG-1 on DVD by Limited+Vision · · Score: 1
    MGM is about to release Season 4 in Region 2 (Europe/Japan/Middle East), (Amazon and Blackstar) but only the first season is available on DVD in North America.

    It usually seems to be the other way around. Wonder what the delay is - syndication rights in N.A., maybe?

    1. Re:Stargate SG-1 on DVD by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Season 4?!?!?!

      Damn it, I'd be happy if they would just release Season 2 on DVD region 1!

      I have Season 1, but it didn't really get good until 2+ (I have about half of season 3 on home-made CDs; 320x480 MPEG-2 at 1.9MB/s actually looks pretty good)

  249. Yes! SG-1 is brilliant. Best 10 episodes are... by Jeremy+Lee · · Score: 1

    SG1 wanders around the place a bit, but it regularly does very 'hard' sci-fi. Another common theme of theirs is to follow through on the human repercussions of the hyper-tech, including the inevitable stupid mistakes. For anyone who's not seen the series, or had the misfortune to see average episodes, (the first season in particlar turned a lot of people off) try these. Each episode is about 20-30Mb. ASF files are DivX.

    If I had to choose just one, "Window of Opportunity" would be it.

    • 1.10 - The Torment of Tantalus Good Intro to the SG1 universe, brilliant treatment of the unfortunate main character.
    • 1.18 - Tin Man Fantastic episode. Can't say any more, or I'll spoil it. :)
    • 2.16 - A matter of time. It's not often that General Relativity is a major plot point. (Ignore the glaring stellar physics mistake made in the first minute.) The ending is slightly lame, though.
    • 2.21 - 1969 There's always the obligatory accidentally-sent-back-in-time episode. What matters is how you handle it.
    • 3.4 - Legacy Great mystery. Gets really spooky in parts. Has one of the classic SG1 'whoops' scenes. Repeat after me: biological weapons are BAD.
    • 3.6 - Point of View They did the typical parallel universe episode in season 1. But of course, the door opens both ways...
    • 3.14 - Foothold Alien invasion, done well.
    • 3.22 - Nemesis 4.1 - Small Victories What the Borg should have been. Plus, a nice little parable on Human ingenuity. Small Victories has a great start!
    • 4.6 - Window of Opportunity Groundhog day, Stargate style. Perhaps the funniest episode made.
    • 4.20 - Entity Assumptions can be dangerous, especially when you're dealing with aliens.
    --
    Jeremy Lee | Orinoco
  250. Earth: Final Conflict by MrCawfee · · Score: 1

    I honestly think that the first 2 seasons of earth final conflict were really good, they had a continuing storyline so you could watch the characters develop and you don't have to watch a TNG episode with the voyager cast. Granted some of the acting in EFC is bad and they are going for the "lets put as many super attractive people infront of computers" approach but the storyline is one of the best i have seen in a sci-fi series.

    Btw whoever decided to kill off Boone should die, i loved his character so much better than the new guy.

  251. The good, the bad, the ugly.... by jmoo · · Score: 1

    What the hell, I'll put my two cents in-

    The Best Scifi on now: Farscape
    I love the characters and the story lines. Yeah I know its runs into being a Buck Rogers show at times, but hey most scifi on TV is playing action-adventure hero card anyway. Farscape does it better than most out there.

    Best Scifi ever: Babylon 5
    Bar none, best scifi tv I have ever watched. Had great dialog, real believable characters (well as real as you are going to get in science fiction, and cool space battles.

    Bad Scifi: Oh so many to pick from -
    First Wave - Sorry for any fans, but I can't watch this show without bursting out laughing at the characters (oh Traci Lords ;)

    Dark Angel - Wish better for this one, but it just doesn't live up to the hype

    Seven Days - I guess this is scifi, but mostly its crap.

    Voyager - can't say anything that has not already been said. It sucked.

    Many, many others but luckily they have been sent the way of cancellation

    Worst Scifi ever - Earth Final Conflict
    This is one has a special place in my heart to hate. It started with such promise - cool story background, great characters, and it came from Gene Rodenberry himself (well his notes anyway) To bad it lost almost all the original characters, got really sucky new ones and the stories have turned into simply the most awful, cliched, ones possible. Most stories run with technobabble and episode resets that would make Voyager's writers blush.

    I'm reserving judgment for Andromeda, to early to tell. I think if they get rid of that Harper character everything will turn out fine.

    --
    The world isn't run by weapons anymore, or energy, or money. It's run by little ones and zeroes, little bits of data.
  252. Re:The Invisible Man by Bugmaster · · Score: 1

    It's an excellent show - I only wish that my cable modem hadn't crapped out on me :-( What makes the show good is that the main character is fully aware of how cheesy the plot is. He doesn't even want to be an invisible man - all he wants to do is to escape these group of wackos who think their contrived games are the center of the world... Thus, he doesn't take any of his missions seriously. It's a great show.

    --
    >|<*:=
  253. Farscape... yes, Lexx... by ffatTony · · Score: 2

    I agress, I love farscape, but I find Lexx very confusing and annoying. I think my difficulty is that I don't watch a lot of tv and when I catch Lexx ocassionally the story is just so different from what I recall of the last episode that it is very hard to follow.

  254. Re:The Invisible Man by sunhou · · Score: 1

    I also enjoy The Invisible Man, mainly as a comedy. I usually get a few laughs per episode out of something that Fawkes and/or Hobbes say. They are hilarious when they get going. And there's just something nice about a show where the main character's main catch-phrase is "Aw, crap." But I have to admit, if it weren't for the good writing, this would seem like standard adventure shlock-TV from the 70's or something, and that's kind of what it seemed like to me the first one or two times I watched it.

    They've already stooped to the "add a hot babe to the show" trick (that female agent is new, right? I only started watching recently; I caught a few reruns from last season, and have been watching this season so far), but she doesn't feel very out-of-place in the show.

  255. Re:Interzone -- Best Sci Fci Currently on Televisi by unitron · · Score: 2
    Actually the Total Recall television series (which was nothing like the movie) wasn't bad at all but didn't build enough of a fan base to keep it around.

    Speaking of the guy whose name I just went blank on, who played the first corporate bad guy on TR, he was the lead on a show called Stingray several years ago that was pretty good, although calling it sci-fi is somewhat of a stretch.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  256. New Star Trek Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many people have heard of the new Star Trek series coming out soon? It's called Enterprise, and it's pre-federation, and obviously pre-Kirk, pre-Enterprise.
    The actualy time is somewhere between Zephram Cochran (guy who invented Warp drive and made "first contact") and Kirk. Scott Bakula (yech) is going to be the commander of the ship. That's all I've got, but if you check out some month or two old issues of TV guide you'll see more. Hopefully, it'll do better than Voyager (flop in my book). I'd like to see something as good as Next Generation (still, by far the best, only because the original is now kinda hokey).

  257. Earth: Final Conflict by fooguy · · Score: 1

    The people who watch EFC are divided into two camps: those who hate it because of the number of cast changes, and those who love it. I'm among the latter. I've been hooked since the pilot.

    The underlying plot is simple: a race of aliens called the Taelons come to Earth "on a mission of peace". They cure our diseases, end famine, and gives of loads of neat technology (Interdimensional Portals just to name one).

    But thinks aren't so rosy. There is an underground resistance who believe the Taelons aren't so benevolant, and it appears they're right. The Taelons are dying, and they're being hunted by their ancestreral cousins the Jaridins. Both races have been at work for thousands of years, and the Taelons have come to Earth in search of an army.

    Along the way, they've created Cyber-Viral Implants (CVIs) which expand memory, recall, and give the owner a motivational imperitive to serve the Taelons. They've enslaved a race called Skrills and bioengineered them so humans with CVIs have a powerful weapon.

    But that only scratches the surface. There is a complex political stugle among the Taelons - to enslave or not to enslave. The leader of the Taelon synod, Qu'on, is killed in the beginning of Season 2 leaving the strugle for power between Da'an (the American Companion) and Zo'or (the UN Companion, and Da'an's child). Along the way, many people die while the resistance is constantly frustrated that their exposure of Taelon atrocities are ignored because humanity is more concerned with owning the latest gadget.

    So if you're interested in catching up, Sci Fi is rerunning all the episodes starting this Monday.

    Check out Sci Fi: http://www.scifi.com/efc/

    Or the official site: http://www.efc.com/

    "People of Earth, we are the Companions. People of Earth, we are here to help."

    --
    "All I ever wanted was to see Larry Wall give Bill Gates a Perl necklace."
    http://www.eisenschmidt.org/jweisen
  258. What? by ddkwe · · Score: 1

    Nobody mentioned '7 days' Heheheh. Nothing like an Australian actor with the American accent happening.

    --
    -= ddkwe =-
  259. The Prisoner? Anyone? by Athlogic · · Score: 1

    I cannot believe no one has even mentioned The Prisoner yet. Am I the only old fart here?

  260. Re:Interzone -- Best Sci Fci Currently on Televisi by Nos9 · · Score: 1

    Another excellent Science Fiction Magazine is Analog http://www.analogsf.com I would highly recommend anyone that likes the harder science fiction to check it out at the local library, then get a subscription.

  261. LEXX by Nos9 · · Score: 1

    LEXX is not exactley Science Fiction, it might fit under the Sci-Fi heading, but is more fiction less science. It is however a great, if quirky series. I was confused at first when I started watching, but now like the television crack that it is, I have become hooked.

  262. Re:The Invisible Man by hyperizer · · Score: 1

    The people behind the Sci-Fi channel are quite brilliant.

    They can't be that brilliant. They cancelled MST3K and just today they played "So I Married an Axe Murderer." That's not sci-fi!

  263. Different Can Be Good by Dfiant · · Score: 1

    ...but only to a point. I really like Farscape and Lexx, but they still have some little annoyances. The last season of Lexx (Fire & Water) was a little too dragged out. Maybe it'll make more sense as this season explores the plot more.

    My only annoyance with Farscape is that they seem to kill off a major character every other episode and then bring him/her back before long. It's not as annoying as it was when they did the wassup-style screaming of the person's name, though. I think they've killed everyone but a few of the main characters at least once now.

  264. Re:Space, Above and Beyond, Fuck yeah! by cookiej · · Score: 1

    I liked SAaB. After awhile, though, it got too formulaic (sp?) 1) Drop into impossible situation. 2) "New" but likable grunt gets killed, everyone sad, 3) They shoot their way out. 4) Colonel grieves privately but humanly about the loss.

    I rented the DVD recently for Roughnecks and was struck by how much it reminded me of SAaB. I loved The Forever War and a lot of the Dorsai books -- but I like SF that goes beyond the ships and guns ... I think calling it closer to Rat Patrol than ST is hitting the nail right on the head.

  265. Angel seems all too similar to another series by DanWaites · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that Angel is a ripoff of "Forever Knight", except I thought the character development was better in FK than in Angel. Nikolaus made a much better reformed vampire, and his position as a police investigator made for much more interesting plots than Angel's home-office-hero setup. Admittedly, FK was a lot more depressing than Angel, as it was a true horror series, and not a primetime action soap opera like Buffy or Angel. I don't mind that FK and Angel have plots that are so similar, but I think since Angel is plodding down a path already traveled, they should work harder on improving on FK's concept and really standing out, instead of simply recycling. Just my opinion :)

    1. Re:Angel seems all too similar to another series by TheHaas · · Score: 1

      I had forgotten about FK, but, once I think about it, there are a lot of similarities.

      FK was really depressing, and Angel can be (like when he was on the edge for about 1/3 of this season). But it's better in the way that there is a bit of humor to lighten things up some, the wisecracks, etc. FK was pretty serious almost all of the time, but Angel really mixes it

      As far as Angel's motivation for doing stuff . . . some of it is just that he wants to make up for everything he did before he got his soul back, and the other is just because he's an agent of TPTB (watch the show, or do a Google search for that one. =) so he has no choice. It's been a while, but Nikolaus's motivation was just because he wanted to be a nice guy.

      just my $0.02, coming back at you.

  266. Space... by 87s10blazer · · Score: 1

    Space: Above and Beyond was good... But the nest on the air now is Lexx or Farscape. There is nothing else on....

  267. ST:TNG second season by orcus · · Score: 1

    The problem with the second season of ST:TNG, is
    it was a casualty of the hollywood writers strike.
    This is something that almost happened recently, but as far as I know, was averted.
    For the second season of ST:TNG, old scripts for
    Star Trek II were hastily edited for current characters, and used.
    First Season ended with a helluva cliffhanger, "Conspiracy". Ok - maybe not the last episode of the season, but one never followed up on at all.
    The horrific "Troi's Baby" episode was lifted right from Star Trek II - makes me glad STII never saw the light of day.

    --
    First they burn books, then they burn people.
  268. How to tell if a Sci-Fi Show is Good. by orcus · · Score: 1

    It is very simple:
    What do these shows have in common?

    Star Trek - the 60's version
    Planet Of The Apes - Television Series
    Space 1999
    Quark
    Space Rangers
    Space Above and Beyond
    Babylon 5*
    Crusade
    7 Days

    They all were canceled.
    Good Sci-Fi is canceled, drek like Voyager lives on is renewed every season.

    The only reason I feel SG-1 has not fallen victim to the curse, is it was NOT originaly on network TV.
    I'd bet money that the major networks would have canceled SG-1 since it is too cereberal for their target audiences.

    If you want to write a sci-fi show nowadays that will be a big hit on network tv - make it about
    a bunch of aliens trapped on an island that wrestle each other to see who gets thrown off.

    (Babylong 5 WAS cancled by it's original network and rescued by TNT. Who later determined they'd
    rather show wrestling than quality sci-fi and canceled Crusade.)

    (yes Quark and Space Rangers were not in the same class as the rest - but they deserve credit for
    attempting to meld comedy and sci-fi)

    --
    First they burn books, then they burn people.
  269. It's LOST IN SPACE! by imagineer_bob · · Score: 1

    The best sci-fi on television, now or ever, is LOST IN SPACE!

  270. Re:Interzone -- Best Sci Fci Currently on Televisi by ethereal · · Score: 1

    Or, in the case of The Day The Earth Stood Still, an even more interesting story entitled "Farewell to the Master". Spoiler alert - once you read the story, you'll wish that had been the movie that was made...

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  271. Re:The simple algorithm to determine good SF/TV by bill.sheehan · · Score: 2
    Remember The Starlost? It was out about - oh, almost 30 years ago. A great premise, but it all fell apart due to a strike and studio machinations. Ellison refused to have his name on it, using instead his pseudonym "Cordwainer Bird."

  272. farscape by Ranger · · Score: 1

    farscape is the best sci-fi show in production. We'll see how Enterrpise fares when it airs in the fall. As for Lexx and The Invisible Man, they both blow. Be grateful they pulled The Secret Adventures of Jules Verne. I forced myself to watch the first episode after the teaser (Yes, it was that bad), and it only got worse. Andromeda is actually entertaining. Much better than the execrable Gene Roddenberry's Earth. Oh, and I mustn't forget Futurama.

    And I guess for non-sci-fi I'll have to say I like Angry Beavers, South Park, and The Sopranos.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  273. NOT SF related by dimator · · Score: 2

    aside from The Simpsons, it's probably the funniest show on the air.

    If you like the simpsons, and funny shows, do yourself a favor and watch The Family Guy. I mean, damn, how can a show be this funny every week? The dad and the baby have pretty much stolen the whole show, but you can run a show off those two characters alone. You can catch most of the third season so far on newsgroups too.

    I don't know how many people are fans of the show, but I fear not enough people for Fox to keep it on the air...

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  274. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  275. I like Lexx. A lot. by irongull · · Score: 1

    Most people who watch Lexx can't get past the absurd and sexual components. And while these do appear to dominate (and I do like them very much) that's not all there is to the show. At a higher level, the science fiction concepts that drive the plot are quite sophisticated, at least in comparison to a lot of the other stuff around. The theme behind the second season was the destructive potential of self-replicating machines. The musical episode "Brigadoom" was the best exploration of the pitfalls of biological immortality that I've ever seen. The third season was a bizarre, surrealist journey through...well, I can't say without spoiling.

    Those of you just getting into Lexx probably haven't seen the first four movies (season 1). The second and third were really just long episodes - but the first and fourth are two of the best damn scifi movies I've ever seen.

    Some other, on-topic ramblings-

    Missing an episode of either Buffy or Angel is unacceptable to me.

    Farscape is rock solid.

    Andromeda could turn out to be really good.

    Earth: Final Conflict had a brilliant first season, and has been going steadily downhill.

    Invisible Man is good, but I still resent the fact that it replaced G vs E, which was incredibly good.

    The Immortal is a pretty blatant Highlander ripoff.

    Stargate SG-1 started out pretty good and is only getting better.

    First Wave is cheesy and over-the-top. Kinda good sometimes.

    I watch way too much TV, and read way too much scifi. I guess I could be considered vaguely knowledgable on the subject.

  276. Modern Sci-Fi's problems are simple by ShortedOut · · Score: 1

    The key to writing anything worthwile is to tell a story. Most Sci-Fi never gets beyond the "idea", and ends up telling the story very poorly.
    Ideas are important, and crucial to Sci-Fi. The reason the first Star Trek was so good, was because Roddenbury(sp?) had good ideas and he understood that the key to his show was the universe, not neccessarily the day to day mundane happenings of life. If you are writing Science fiction, and have a wonderful, magical world out there, that (the environment) should be your story, not some petty personal conflict among the crew.
    Too many Sci-Fi writers try to just use an idea, and build personal conflict around it in a futuristic setting, and they just plain old forget to tell a good story and build on their universe. If you look at The Hobbit, Tolkein didn't get too much into character conflict. He brought you into his world, and explained it beautifully. The world was what the story was about, not so much the people in it.
    Honestly, I used to absolutely dig Sci-Fi, but they keep building off of each other, and the "futuristic" technology ideas that they incorporate into each show have become mundane and unimaginative. The writers know this, so they add petty, everyday jibber-jabber into the script, and the show ends up being flat.

  277. I second that!!! by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1

    can't we all live in harmoney?

  278. Why Farscape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll tell you why farscape...

    first, it doesn't rely on stupid technology like Voyager did. Every week, voyager spent a bunch of time coming up with some cool new technology. "87 isotons" "500 isotons" "a million isotons" it was boring. Some people were continually impressed with the ability of the scriptwriting to create a new, banal alien every week, and multiply some number used in a previous episode by some number greater than one.

    Farscape doesn't care how things work. The plot is the most important thing. Drama is maintained. With a great plot comes suspension of disbelief, and with SOD, it doesn't matter if the physics don't work at all. Even if Chriton can understand every language thanks to those micro-robots, everybody's lips should move with their native language, instead of them talking English. I don't care. Explaining the tech would take valuable character development/plot time away.

    Second, they do good stories. Voyager got into a rut with the stories due to a doomed concept. Voyager could never really revisit cool aliens, and when they did, it was under extremely improbably circumstances. The concept of the whole show was that voyager was moving through space along a pretty straight line, and thus, it was almost impossible to have effective multi-episode story elements. Farscape, like babylon 5 did, has story elements that persist. The scarans are evil. Scorpius wants wormhole technology. Peace keepers hate scarans. (Excuse the spelling, as I have never seen most of this in print...) The story of the series is a continuous one, divided into several episodes. Voyager, like first season Lexx, was just a series of individual stories, most of which could be arbitrarily rearranged, to little ill effect.

    Current Lexx tries to do this, but it did a poor job of dividing the elements of the large story (a season) into smaller, self complete segments. Lexx tends to end an episode with more of a cliff hanger than an ending. This is fine on occasion, but when done consistently, just makes it seem like the story writers couldn't figure out how to chop the story up into actual episodes.

    With Farscape, even though there is a larger story, each episode is self contained, as doesn't end with a cliff hanger. Resolution comes at the end of the episode, instead of the start of the next one. Done like this, each episode is a cohesive drama, while each season, and the whole series, is also a single cohesive drama.

    Oh, and the blue chick is hot, man. Not to mention the gray one, and the gold one. Oh, baby.

  279. Re:The Invisible Man by The+Troll+Catcher · · Score: 1

    Which female agent do you mean? I haven't been able to watch the show all summer (I get SciFi at school, but know at home), but the only regular "hot babe" I know of is the Keeper, who's been there since the pilot.

  280. Roswell! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I have been favorably impressed with the few episodes of Farscape that I've seen. However I am surprised that there has been almost no comment on Roswell, with it's themes that should resonate with many geeks

    For those that have not seen Roswell, in first episode Liz Parker finds out that some of her high school classmates are not human. Why the aliens are on earth, their origins and related details are things we (and they, as the aliens at the start of the series know very little about their own origins) have been learning over the last two seasons (and looking forward to learning more in the upcomming 3rd season). This show is at times rough on the audience, some times it is a little over the top in terms of melodrama, and at times they have killed off likeable characters, or had seemingly nice characters turn out to be traitors.

    Still, with it's recuring story element of characters set apart from the masses because of who they are (the aliens) or because of what they know and the secrets they must keep (the humans like Liz Parker), Roswell should be on any geeks must watch list.

    P.S. In Canada, starting this week "Space" will be running Roswell re-runs each weekday evening in the same time slot formerly held Babylon 5 (another very good show).

  281. Re:The Invisible Man by Radnor · · Score: 1

    You know, I also thought it was Darrien "Fox" as well. Then I started watching it with closed captioning and found out that it is Darrien "Fawkes".

    Speaking of closed captioning, I've noticed that a lot of the shows I watch-- ER, Farscape, Invisible Man-- are being captioned with proper capitalization. Why the change from ALL CAPS, AS WITH OTHER SHOWS? I DID NOT LIKE ALL CAPS, THOUGH. IT'S PROBABLY FASTER TO READ, BUT IT'S NOT AS PRETTY.

  282. A writer's comment by Jeff+Corkern · · Score: 1

    Hi, y'all. I have been lurking for months now, gathering materials for my stories. I'm a wannabe science fiction writer. I had no intention of ever saying a word, but y'all (Yes, I'm a Southerner.) are talking about a subject I know a little about, so I'd thought I'd add my two cents, and maybe add a little lagniappe.

    For over-all quality, I'd pick Asimov's the best anywhere. The writing quality is high. Gardner Dozois (the editor) publishes character-oriented SF, and he's -good- at it, as his multiple Best Editor Hugo awards attest. If you want to see what I'm talking about, Asimov's has all of their Hugo-nominated stories available for reading free of charge at:

    http://www.asimovs.com

    (In my opinion, Greg Egan's story "Oracle" is brilliant and got my vote for the Hugo this year. It is not adventure SF, but rather philosophical SF. Highly interesting to someone who is familiar with C. S. Lewis and his philosophy.)

    I don't really have a second place. F&SF, maybe, with Analog close behind. I'm not too much into fantasy, so F&SF doesn't do much for me, although as a writer I really appreciate Gordon Van Gelder's short response times and personalized rejection slips. Stanley Schmidt (Analog's editor) gives equal weight to ideas and characters. The result can be clunky writing, but the ideas are usually interesting. Oh, yes, Analog's Hugo-nominated stories are currently available free of charge at:

    http://www.analogsf.com

    (I recommend Kristine Kathryn Rusch's "The Retrieval Artist". Relatively decent hard-boiled detective writing.)

    Re the decline of the print mags: It is odd, given the current cultural popularity of SF (I can remember when the only SF on TV was "Star Trek", and it was, no joke, considered to be sophisticated), that the mags' circulation numbers are going down, but it's true. It would be nice to see this change, but I am not making a plea here for you to "support" the print magazines. Something that has to beg for "support" has one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel. Instead, I hope that if you like what your read at their Web sites, to consider subscribing, and if you continue like it, then to renew your subscription. The print mags, at least currently, are the incubators from which a lot of the new writers spring.

    I say "currently". There are a number of on-line mags as well. My current favorite is Strange Horizons, at:

    http://www.strangehorizons.com

    I have read some excellent fiction there. If you are a curious type, there is a beautifully done online catalog of of mags, print and Web, at:

    http://www.ralan.com

    This is mainly a writer's resource, and so contains a lot of info irrelevant to a reader, but the type of story each mag prints, plus their URL, is listed, from mainstream SF to really weird stuff. If you like to read flying-elephant fiction and want to know who publishes it, this is a good place to go. Probably most of the Web mags are free, but the mag scene is in constant flux these days, and things are changing rapidly.

    The Sci-Fi channel also publishes fiction online, BTW, just not much. They have hired a prestigious editor, Ellen Datlow, to buy their stories for them. For unknown reasons, they only publish two new and two old stories a month, all short stories. (Why, oh God? It ain't like you got to chop down trees to make hard drives!) The quality is high, although Ellen sometimes gets a little too high-falutin' lit-'try for my taste. The URL is:

    http://www.scifi.com/scifiction

    But the subject was "The Best Sci-Fi On Television". My vote is for SG-1. I don't have cable and therefore have not seen Farscape, but it is getting raves everywhere, and I am almighty curious. I like SG-1 because it seemed to have it all, at least in the beginning. Action, good characters who developed, multiple-episode story arcs, and a strong effort to get the details right, military and scientific. I mourn its passing, even though my local Fox affiliate dropped it a year ago for, God help me, re-runs of local arena football games.

    Final Conflict had good characters and a good situation, but not enough action. It failed to engage my attention. A TV show, any visual medium, has to -move-, the place for cerebration is print.

    Futurama is one of the best shows on television, but I don't regard it as an SF show, just a comedy show set in the future.

    My two cents.

    Jeff Corkern

  283. Re:The simple algorithm to determine good SF/TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Starlost was great aside from the plots, writing, acting, sets and special effects, all of which were remarkably bad. That is to say that the original idea (a huge, multi-generational ship lost in space) is a wonderful idea that's never been done before or since (that I know of).

    I spent a good while tracking down the book Harlan Ellison wrote about the making of the series, which was horrifying and amusing in that sadistically brilliant way that Harlan Ellison has. It started out a big-budget Sci-Fi series co-produced by the BBS, a US network, and the Canadian Broadcasting Company. By the end, the ones with the money pulled out, and the CBC produced the show, so the end result included all of the stupid ideas of the three networks, produced on only the CBC's money.

    I loved the idea behind the series, forced myself to watch every episode, and I even spent some time reworking the ship into the setting of a role playing game. Lotsa fun.

  284. Ya darn tootin! by SparkyMartin · · Score: 1
    B5 is a show that once you start watching it you want to keep watching it (except for the first half of the first season) because it is so good, because so many episodes leave hints about what is to come and make you want to see more, because the effects are simply amazing-many of the battle scenes are spectacular and intense and so well directed, and because you love the characters and want to see what happens to them. If Andreas Katsulus (Gkar) and Peter Jurassic (Londo) didn't receive emmys for their performances they should have.

    It just went off the air in Canada Jul31, but there is a Farewell to B5 marathon tomorrow.

    First Wave I like, and I just started watching Stargate SG-1 and what I have seen is quite good. Everyone is talking about Farscape so I will take a look at that when it starts showing up here in the fall, and I'm holding out hope that Enterprise wont turn into another Star Trek Voyager technobabble mishmash.

  285. Amen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love the story writing of B5 - JMS has proven that taking a well thought out plot and universe can be done before a single episode is produced! I love using Star Trek: TNG episodes as MST3K fodder :) The Ultimate B5 Guide

  286. "Sapphire and Steel" by angkor · · Score: 1

    Sapphire and Steel is a British show from the late-70's that is equal parts fantasy and sci-fi. It is probably the only sci-fi/fantasy show with no special effects at all. It starred Joanna Lumley & David McCallum as two "elements" dispatched to different points in time and space to correct disruptions caused by time travel. What was unique was that there were rarely more than four characters (including S & S) in any show and the action took place on spartan, barely-lit sets.

    For instance, in one episode Sapphire and Steel are on a roof trying to enter an invisible time machine to save a child inside. Another episode takes place in a few rooms of a "haunted house" with a true-believing ghost hunter. It is one of few shows I have ever seen that can be as engrossing in the same way a radio drama is...

    Blackstar (http://www.blackstar.co.uk) used to carry episodes on tape, but the series has been out of print since the early 1990's. There were plans to put the whole series on video last year, but it keeps getiing cancelled.

  287. Re:The Prisoner? Anyone? by unitron · · Score: 2
    They also haven't mentioned The Invaders (original Roy Thinnes version, not that awful TV movie with Bakula a few years ago) or The Immortal (the one with Christopher George as a guy with some kind of special blood that the evil rich guys are chasing him for, not that current thing with Lorenzo Lamas).

    We may be running into the problem of "Just what is or isn't Science Fiction" here. What qualifies The Prisoner? Those oversized bubble gum bubbles floating on the sea? Would the original Wild, Wild West television show qualify? It had as many "not supposed to have been invented yet back then" things as The Secret Adventures of Jules Verne or whatever the name of it is. What about The Man from Uncle or Get Smart? Perhaps even a few or more of the episodes of The Avengers.

    The dividing line is awfully blurry.

    Just for the heck of it I'm going to mention the 80's version of War of the Worlds. Oh yeah, and that English or Australian thing that PBS showed a few episodes of several years ago where they put metal plates in everybody's heads and made them look like bowling balls.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  288. FIRSTWAVE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I've gone to all the trouble of dl'in most of the scifi shows from various *places*...now I have to say that there are a handful of GOOD ones that NOTHING can compete with Star Trek Deep Space 9 Earth Final Conflict Stargate SG-1 FIRSTWAVE First off Firstwave is the best damned show with the most originality that I have EVER seen. Now I've got nearly all of the episodes in DIVX, 250-450megs and I have to say that if you watch them IN ORDER from 1x01-Subject 117 all the way to 3x22 Twice Bless'd then you MUST agree that its one hell of a show. The thing that saddens me is the fact that there would have been a season 4 if you pricks would have watched it instead of some B class crapbuster called farscape. Firstwave quite possibly could be one of the best shows of the century. The way it was executed with quadtrains, and everything was 100% original. The adding of Traci Lords i'm still 50/50 bout wheather or not it was a good idea, but it definately hasnt screwed the show or made it less of a show. She did good acting in it and the guy that plays Cade Foster in Firstwave is 1 of my favorite actors just because he has the skills to play the part. Shit somtimes you'd forget your watching a tv show...Crazy Eddie in the show was actualy a more believable hacker type because in all reality for the mostpart thats how those type of hacks and such are done. I dont know but you need to go watch the re runs or go dl the tv eps from someplaces...you MAY be able to find em on newsgroups but thats a maybe...

  289. Blake's 7 by schepers · · Score: 1

    Blake's 7 was, I must agree, a killer show. But I'd have to respectfully disagree that it was much like FarScape. Except insofar as they were both derivative of the original Star Trek (which was, in turn, deeply derivative of Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, I kid you not--tape a few episodes from early morning SciFi, you may be surprised).

    Where they differ is in tone. B7 was a bleak, grim universe with the main characters attempting a rebellion against the oppressive Federation. It beautifully turned ST on its ear, presenting the "unifying" force as a colonialist empire.

    In FarScape, while there is a bit of that with the Peacekeepers, the predominant tone is one of a quest for home and/or family. The episodes have a much wider range of focus than in B7--sometimes almost random.

    Both excellent shows, but apart from the inherent silimarities of zap-gun, rocket-ranger space opera, quite different.



    Oh, and Voyager sucked. B5 was okay, though.

  290. "This is my *favorite* show!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMO, Invader Zim is the best thing on TV at the moment. Even the worst episode so far made me laugh hysterically. Oh, and by the way, the head writers are Johnen Vasquez ("Johnny the Homicidal Maniac", "Squee")(All the art is in his style, and it's *beautiful*), Roman Dirge ("Lenore"), and Frank Coniff (MST3K's 'TV's Frank') How can you go wrong?? Zim: "You REMOVED your navigaton chip? Why would you do a thing like that??" GIR: "Duh, to make room for the cupcake!"

  291. Re:The Prisoner? Anyone? by catseye_95051 · · Score: 2

    Prisioner walks the edge of sci fi. Some episdoes are (The General, and a number of other ones regarding futuristic brainashing techniques) but many aren't.

    Wild Wild West is the original example of what is now being called "Setam Punk" and IS considered a form of science fiction.

  292. E:FC , B5... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Earth: Final Conflict has turned onto a great series (shaky start-up). They have really got a good plot based series. Babylon 5 might be a bit better... toss up really, but it was truly well thought out and planned before they began to film. Both shows probably have the highest learning curve though (context is essential to each episode)... which is why they are preffered by veterans of Scifi (ok I am only 20, but loved Battlestar Galactica, Buck Rogers and ST as a kid). ST:TNG was good, but they had a few really crappy episodes, and lost continuity too much. Anybody who will stand up for Voyager needs a good lashing. ST:DS9 was surprisingly good, better than ST:TNG / Voyager by far. Some people couldn't get past the fact that the show was more of the B5 concept in ST uniforms. I guess they really didn't appreciate the character internaction that made DS9 fun... again the show had a higher learning curve to catch everything. I haven't seen Farscape yet, but it sounds cool. Andromeda currently looks too much like the low budget version of Voyager, but the character developement is moving in the E:FC direction of tight interaction (they still have some learning to do). The conventions of the show suck though (Kevin Sorbo, a purple chick with a rubber tail, and a guy in a mangled gorilla suit), and it surprised me that they got past season 1 with that, granted I had litte tollerance for Dr Who and the other PBS style Sci-fi.... there has to be some bar of quality, even if the writing is awesome (no yet in the case of Andromeda anyways) I look foward to the new B5 shows, though I need to have cable hooked up again... or hack some DSS :)

  293. ST:TNG sucks by WINSTANLEY · · Score: 1

    Though I enjoyed watching it and was caught in the entire Star Trek phenom, the truth is that as sci-fi ST:TNG has some real problems. Bogus unrealistic science (totally contrived for the plots), predictable plots, deux-ex-machina endings, plots that were derivative from the original series, unrealistic "feel good" relationships between the main characters, very little short trajectories in the development of the characters (except for data). Great writing it is not, even by sci-fi standards. Ex. The episode on which Scotty appears involves a Dyson sphere, one of the most interesting concepts of futuristic speculation, and it did absolutely nothing with it!

    --
    It is by coff... er, will, alone I set my mind in motion...
  294. Not that great by abertoll · · Score: 1

    I didn't really like Farscape. I had a friend who loved it and recommended I watch it. I suppose it wasn't ALL bad, but definitely not something I'd spend my time watching. The sci-fi on TV that I do watch are the original star trek episodes. Even though I wouldn't exactly recommend these to people who don't have nostalgia for them, I still say they're interesting.

    --
    "he drew his sword Ringil that glittered like ice... and he wounded Morgoth with seven wounds..."
  295. La Femme Nikita Was Great SF Once Upon A Time... by cybrpnk · · Score: 2

    ...but then they killed Birkhoff, and the rest of Season Four sucked, bordering on insane, then the fans pitched a fit, "How could you DO that to the show we loved!" and got it back for a mini-Season Five, whereupon the producers of the show said "If you thought S4 was bad, wait til you see THIS...."

    A real shame, because Nikita was a show with class when it was good.

  296. Werewolves vs Vampires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just as upset about the state of sci fi on tv as anyone else. The difference is I've decided to do something about it. www.werewolvesvsvampires.com Let me know if this is something you would watch. Alpha@werewolvesvsvampires.com

  297. Puppet Show by VivianC · · Score: 2

    In my home, we always call Farscape "The Puppet Show." I think it was the only way I could convince my non-sci-fi wife to give it a try. Now she watches every week. She misses most of the subtile bits, but she knows all the characters.

    And since we are using this thread to wax nostalgic, here's my short sci-fi list:
    Farscape
    Dr. Who
    Battlestar Galactica (campy, but cool)
    Blake's Seven

    --
    Viv

    Gmail invites for ip
  298. LEXX was "Tales from an Alternate Universe" by MercTech · · Score: 1

    I remember the short run that Tales from an Alternate Universe had on HBO.

    If you want to see the very beginning of LEXX, go rent the movie: "I Worship His Shadow"

    --
    NRRPT/RCT
  299. Re:Babylon 5 for reruns, and a few other goods one by ikanakattara · · Score: 1

    Babylon 5. Then Crusade. Not much else, IMO.

    (Longing for Dr. Who and Blakes' Seven reruns...)