Well, everything'll be redacted from defense lawyers and the public eye anyways, so whatever they don't find in there they can always simply add.
..."and somehow rewrite the message hash in the header to conceal the fact that the message body has in fact been tampered with."
Worn that t-shirt, matey. Pissed all over someone's claim that I had sent them messages (by proving, using the hashes, that they couldn't possibly have originated from my email account - without the need to access the account itself. In situ HMAC authentication failed every time).
Even if the warrant *appears* to be genuine, and the avenues pursued to obtain it were in themselves legal, if the information used to obtain them was not quite shall we say, entirely complete or truthful, then ab initio they are invalid and void. Not "voidable" or challengable, VOID. Which renders any subsequent prosecution based on evidence gathered under the authority of said warrants, also VOID.
For definition of "complete" and "truthful", refer to the fact that John Doe lawsuits have previously been declared VOID by a US Federal District Judge: a year ago almost to the day, I posted this submission which was rejected (who's laughing now?):
"Four people accused of sharing illegal copies of the movie "Elf-Man" persuaded a federal judge there is not enough evidence to support copyright infringement claims against them.
Elf-Man LLC, producer of the direct-to-DVD release "Elf-Man" sued Eric Cariveau et al. in Federal Court a year ago, accusing them of sharing a peer-to-peer file of the movie.
Elf-Man claims the defendants illegally copied and distributed the movie online.
"Despite the industry's efforts to capitalize on internet technology and reduce costs to end viewers through legitimate and legal means of online viewing such as through Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime, there are still those that use this technology to steal motion pictures and undermine the efforts of creators through their illegal copying and distribution of motion pictures," Elf-Man's attorney Maureen VanderMay wrote in the complaint.
U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik granted Elf-Man's motion to initiate discovery on the IP addresses of defendants, but noted that "the risk of false positives is very real."
"It is not clear that plaintiff could... make factual contentions regarding an Internet subscriber's infringing activities based solely on the fact that he or she pays the Internet bill," Lasnik wrote in the order.
Elf-Man named 18 individual defendants in its first amended complaint. A default judgment was ordered against two of them; claims against the Doe defendants were dismissed. Claims against four other named defendants were also dismissed on the grounds of their implausibility."
Thus fulfilling the "complete"ness requirement. As to "truthful", that is as they say, in the eye of the beholder. As for me, I would require sufficient cause to issue a warrant, and not just mere suspicion.
PS-PVD could be part of the solution, if they could find some way of dissipating the heat through hte superstructure during flight (presumably without igniting the fuel tank)
jetliner wheel brakes don't have to last much beyond bringing an aircraft to a dead stop. Hypersonic airframes have to withstand constant high temperatures and aerodynamic stress. CC can't do the former without oxidising (threshold of oxidation on carbon composite is about 1650C while the skin temperature is tested at 2000+) so a coating is needed that only needs to withstand the high temperature without decomposing. Elemental metals are out, as are superalloys, silicon composite is definitely out since at these temperatures it does as designed on SSO heatshields: it evaporates giving the airframe a shield made of hot plasma (which will not only disrupt the airfoil but the oxide coating as well), something else has to be found. More info here: Hypersonic Technology for Military Application (National Academies, 1 Jan 1990)
I just installed OpenSUSE 13.2 on a VM with 2GB RAM assigned, installed using the network image. EVERYTHING worked. I mean EVERYTHING. All my devices, mapped shares, the lot.
The fuck did I do wrong?? Usually when I install $NT, I have to spend the next six hours dicking around with system updates, device drivers and application licence keys.
oh, bearing in mind that we're talking about cruise missiles here, not stratospheric flight. Cruise missiles fly below RADAR screens, which means that they're flying through the thickest soup of air and particulates it's possible to go without taking the tops off of trees - which given the flight profile, is also entirely possible.
possible I grant you, but like I say, practical? Hardly. Unless they come up with new materials to use in constructing new super-miniaturised baffles and that can withstand the dynamic stresses &c...
Vietnam (remember Tet? Of course, you do. It's at the front of your memory along with the Fall of Saigon) Korea (or: how the fuck do you think the Kims have been in charge for the past few decades?) Panama (see Columbia) Cuba (see Columbia, also see: communism, Bay of Pigs, Castro, the Missile Crisis, Gitmo) Iraq (what's the death rate among civilians since Hussein was deposed? Up, you say? I wonder why that is?) Afghanistan (you really believe the rhetoric that the Taliban are gone, beaten, extinct? Take a look at Pakistan, they moved is all. Afghanistan is now left with no leadership, never mind centralised, democratically elected Government and the opium industry is doing a record roaring international trade protected not by the US military now, but by private contractors trained and equipped by the CIA) Columbia (and the others marked as Axis in the "war on drugs", which was lost the second it was announced since it funds the CIA) Red Cloud (Treaty of Fort Laramie)
cruise missiles aren't hypersonic, either. The Brahmos is the fastest at the moment and that barely does Mach 2.8 in perfect conditions - just 30 feet above terrain. There are a couple others that do better than M1.75. Harpoon (submarine launched) and Tomahawk (MK. I land-based) are both subsonic, there are others that are barely supersonic. Most of these are launched using solid rockets and switch to airbreathing jets for the cruise phase (there are some that are entirely jet powered).
I don't know which missile you're talking about having 144 warheads, most MIRVs on ICBM launch vehicles have 3 tactical, or *maybe* 14 field warheads. The largest one I can think of is the W87 MX Peacekeeper which has 14 each of 12kT yield. Enough to kill a large city but leaving very little damage relative to a single 1MT warhead which would uberkill the entire area and spread fallout over hundreds of square miles.
hypersonic *airbreathing* missiles are about as likely as me setting foot on Mars.
Even supersonic aircraft have problems, simply because you have to slow the air down before it enters the combustion chamber - otherwise it's travelling too fast to ignite the fuel. That's why you have baffles and diverters in supersonic intakes. They are LARGE. Check out Concorde's engines, those intakes were huge and the diverters completely obscured the view of the turbines, in fact the precombustion section was the single largest component of the entire engine and it was mostly empty space.
Hypsonic baffles would be a: too bulky and b: too heavy to use in a missile where the whole idea for a military application is to make it as small a cross-section as possible - not so much for targetting (what's going to catch a missile doing 6,000mph?), but for detection. Even a 4 minute warning, which is what you're going to have, is better than nothing.
I started doing this in 2003, by 2006 I was ready to quit it because my house started to resemble a knacker's yard, by 2008 I'd sold all but a few drives (I still have two 8GB Colorado and a DC300 drives and a box of tapes for each), only kept those because I have archival media for them.
to remind you: GP did not specify how old the drives were he was referring to. Only that they were Seagate. I'm not the only one on this thread who proved his claim to be a pile of shit.
Slashdot Mirror
File it with "Scientology bunkum".
...no, actually, I'll keep that one under my belt. It's actually rather good.
I mean, what is this shit, "Please do my homework for me by suggesting a phone app I can do to score higher and make a little cash into the bargain"?
you aren't hacking the one person who's hacking you, you're hacking innocents whose computers have been hijacked for the sole purpose of hacking you.
Twat.
Great idea... why didn't we think of that?
o.0
depends if they got the warrant for legit/truthful reasons, though.
Well, everything'll be redacted from defense lawyers and the public eye anyways, so whatever they don't find in there they can always simply add.
..."and somehow rewrite the message hash in the header to conceal the fact that the message body has in fact been tampered with."
Worn that t-shirt, matey. Pissed all over someone's claim that I had sent them messages (by proving, using the hashes, that they couldn't possibly have originated from my email account - without the need to access the account itself. In situ HMAC authentication failed every time).
Even if the warrant *appears* to be genuine, and the avenues pursued to obtain it were in themselves legal, if the information used to obtain them was not quite shall we say, entirely complete or truthful, then ab initio they are invalid and void. Not "voidable" or challengable, VOID. Which renders any subsequent prosecution based on evidence gathered under the authority of said warrants, also VOID.
For definition of "complete" and "truthful", refer to the fact that John Doe lawsuits have previously been declared VOID by a US Federal District Judge: a year ago almost to the day, I posted this submission which was rejected (who's laughing now?):
"Four people accused of sharing illegal copies of the movie "Elf-Man" persuaded a federal judge there is not enough evidence to support copyright infringement claims against them. ... make factual contentions regarding an Internet subscriber's infringing activities based solely on the fact that he or she pays the Internet bill," Lasnik wrote in the order.
Elf-Man LLC, producer of the direct-to-DVD release "Elf-Man" sued Eric Cariveau et al. in Federal Court a year ago, accusing them of sharing a peer-to-peer file of the movie.
Elf-Man claims the defendants illegally copied and distributed the movie online.
"Despite the industry's efforts to capitalize on internet technology and reduce costs to end viewers through legitimate and legal means of online viewing such as through Netflix, Hulu, and Amazon Prime, there are still those that use this technology to steal motion pictures and undermine the efforts of creators through their illegal copying and distribution of motion pictures," Elf-Man's attorney Maureen VanderMay wrote in the complaint.
U.S. District Judge Robert Lasnik granted Elf-Man's motion to initiate discovery on the IP addresses of defendants, but noted that "the risk of false positives is very real."
"It is not clear that plaintiff could
Elf-Man named 18 individual defendants in its first amended complaint. A default judgment was ordered against two of them; claims against the Doe defendants were dismissed. Claims against four other named defendants were also dismissed on the grounds of their implausibility."
Thus fulfilling the "complete"ness requirement. As to "truthful", that is as they say, in the eye of the beholder. As for me, I would require sufficient cause to issue a warrant, and not just mere suspicion.
wow... by 22 years... o.0 never realised Nintendo was that old
PS-PVD could be part of the solution, if they could find some way of dissipating the heat through hte superstructure during flight (presumably without igniting the fuel tank)
that was the entire point of Bush's "War on Terror". He wanted the Taliban "Dead". Not "beaten", "DEAD".
Who's the "sick fuck"?
jetliner wheel brakes don't have to last much beyond bringing an aircraft to a dead stop. Hypersonic airframes have to withstand constant high temperatures and aerodynamic stress. CC can't do the former without oxidising (threshold of oxidation on carbon composite is about 1650C while the skin temperature is tested at 2000+) so a coating is needed that only needs to withstand the high temperature without decomposing. Elemental metals are out, as are superalloys, silicon composite is definitely out since at these temperatures it does as designed on SSO heatshields: it evaporates giving the airframe a shield made of hot plasma (which will not only disrupt the airfoil but the oxide coating as well), something else has to be found. More info here: Hypersonic Technology for Military Application (National Academies, 1 Jan 1990)
that's a shame, maybe they think the Minuteman III per warhead is a cheaper delivery option...
my document repository on my netbook runs through a wiki written in php.
Why? Because I can. And it looks cool.
I just installed OpenSUSE 13.2 on a VM with 2GB RAM assigned, installed using the network image. EVERYTHING worked. I mean EVERYTHING. All my devices, mapped shares, the lot.
The fuck did I do wrong?? Usually when I install $NT, I have to spend the next six hours dicking around with system updates, device drivers and application licence keys.
oh, bearing in mind that we're talking about cruise missiles here, not stratospheric flight. Cruise missiles fly below RADAR screens, which means that they're flying through the thickest soup of air and particulates it's possible to go without taking the tops off of trees - which given the flight profile, is also entirely possible.
possible I grant you, but like I say, practical? Hardly. Unless they come up with new materials to use in constructing new super-miniaturised baffles and that can withstand the dynamic stresses &c...
Vietnam (remember Tet? Of course, you do. It's at the front of your memory along with the Fall of Saigon)
Korea (or: how the fuck do you think the Kims have been in charge for the past few decades?)
Panama (see Columbia)
Cuba (see Columbia, also see: communism, Bay of Pigs, Castro, the Missile Crisis, Gitmo)
Iraq (what's the death rate among civilians since Hussein was deposed? Up, you say? I wonder why that is?)
Afghanistan (you really believe the rhetoric that the Taliban are gone, beaten, extinct? Take a look at Pakistan, they moved is all. Afghanistan is now left with no leadership, never mind centralised, democratically elected Government and the opium industry is doing a record roaring international trade protected not by the US military now, but by private contractors trained and equipped by the CIA)
Columbia (and the others marked as Axis in the "war on drugs", which was lost the second it was announced since it funds the CIA)
Red Cloud (Treaty of Fort Laramie)
cruise missiles aren't hypersonic, either. The Brahmos is the fastest at the moment and that barely does Mach 2.8 in perfect conditions - just 30 feet above terrain. There are a couple others that do better than M1.75. Harpoon (submarine launched) and Tomahawk (MK. I land-based) are both subsonic, there are others that are barely supersonic. Most of these are launched using solid rockets and switch to airbreathing jets for the cruise phase (there are some that are entirely jet powered).
I don't know which missile you're talking about having 144 warheads, most MIRVs on ICBM launch vehicles have 3 tactical, or *maybe* 14 field warheads. The largest one I can think of is the W87 MX Peacekeeper which has 14 each of 12kT yield. Enough to kill a large city but leaving very little damage relative to a single 1MT warhead which would uberkill the entire area and spread fallout over hundreds of square miles.
hypersonic *airbreathing* missiles are about as likely as me setting foot on Mars.
Even supersonic aircraft have problems, simply because you have to slow the air down before it enters the combustion chamber - otherwise it's travelling too fast to ignite the fuel. That's why you have baffles and diverters in supersonic intakes. They are LARGE. Check out Concorde's engines, those intakes were huge and the diverters completely obscured the view of the turbines, in fact the precombustion section was the single largest component of the entire engine and it was mostly empty space.
Hypsonic baffles would be a: too bulky and b: too heavy to use in a missile where the whole idea for a military application is to make it as small a cross-section as possible - not so much for targetting (what's going to catch a missile doing 6,000mph?), but for detection. Even a 4 minute warning, which is what you're going to have, is better than nothing.
I started doing this in 2003, by 2006 I was ready to quit it because my house started to resemble a knacker's yard, by 2008 I'd sold all but a few drives (I still have two 8GB Colorado and a DC300 drives and a box of tapes for each), only kept those because I have archival media for them.
almost as bad as watching it on a WinCE device (yeah, tried playing Quake on a Dell Axim X5, wasn't happening).
ok. Cite your sources. Mine are all in the summary.
to remind you: GP did not specify how old the drives were he was referring to. Only that they were Seagate. I'm not the only one on this thread who proved his claim to be a pile of shit.
They've only been around through two world wars.