Pre-heating is heating up the interior while it is still charging, so as to use less charge for heating once you depart. Heating takes a lot of energy and drains the battery faster, as I understand even more than cooling.
Of course, gas vehicles can be pre-heated as well, you just start them up a bit before you depart ( but you don't want to do that in a closed garage!)
The standard is from 1987, it is right in the title "ANSI IEEE-762-1987". You again show ignorance, now ignorant on how standards are revised, again proving your contentions about your experience are false, that is why I won't be reading any more of your bullshit. You should stop making a fool of yourself.
Two of your ignorant quotes;
Capacity' factor is a word that is only used in the climate denier scene and recently by marketing droids.
It is not a performance measure.
Capacity Factor is a standard industry measure that has been used for quite some time. Here is an ANSI/IEEE standard from way back in 1987 which clearly defines Capacity Factor under Performance Indexes. You cannot deny this unless you are an utter fool.
Unfortunately, you will still deny it, and continue with your willful ignorance. For that reason I will no longer read any of your replies, but I might just keep reminding you of your ignorant contention.
Capacity' factor is a word that is only used in the climate denier scene and recently by marketing droids.
It is not a performance measure.
Capacity Factor is a standard industry measure that has been used for quite some time. Here is an ANSI/IEEE standard from way back in 1987 which clearly defines Capacity Factor under Performance Indexes. You cannot deny this unless you are an utter fool.
Unfortunately, you will still deny it, and continue with your willful ignorance. For that reason I will no longer read any of your replies, but I might just keep reminding you of your ignorant contention.
'Capacity' factor is a word that is only used in the climate denier scene and recently by marketing droids.
I proved this to be a statement of ignorance. You then felt compelled to backpedal and shift the discussion to other performance measures. There are many performance measures, and they have their uses. They are tools. You don't say "a wrench is useless because it can't drive a screw". But that is they type of argumentative logic you are trying to pass off, and that is why I largely ignore it. I know perfectly well there are a variety of performance measures and tools. You can pine away at them all day, and I can add more.
But, back to the whole point of your original contention, it was simply ignorant, case closed.
How about automating the package delivery from truck to driver? I see the driver go back a get a package after he stops, that often takes as long longer than bringing it to my doorstep. If the truck pulled up the parcel for the driver as he approached the house, he could save quite a bit of time.
You have a good point about setup. Seems that they would need a programmed drop spot for each house. I suppose over time they would have the route & drop data for all repeat customers, but the time to setup time for each house would likely required more time to complete than the first few manual deliveries.
To be fair, what kind of words are likely to be sent - since data is only sent when explicitly using the voice recognition feature? "put channel 11", "switch on/off", "weather tomorrow" - probably not so juicy...
If they heard what I was screaming at the TV during the NFL playoffs, I might be accused of a hate crime.
I new you could not answer the question, a question that even a young inexperienced professional could answer. I'll ask again, and even clarify where it shouldn't have been needed, but no matter because you'll avoid answering, I'm sure. ....
The best single thing to predict performance, of any kind, is????
You continue to embarrass yourself. Even if I showed you how it is clearly defined as a performance measure, you would deny what I present, or make some weaselly excuse, so why should I even bother?
Any one that says "100% Capacity Factor" in the context you used it in is just plain ignorant to how it is used to start with. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
It is quite easy to adjust for load demand, if needed, why you didn't realize that is quite amazing given your claimed expertise.
Add that to the list of ignorant, stupid things you post here. That is exactly what CF is, a performance measure.
And with that, you confirm that you are not only ignorant in the energy area, but also most likely making fraudulent claims regarding your experience. At the very least, it explains why you no longer work in the industry.
I read the summary and thought "wow, this is really stupid". Then I read the article......and confirmed that thought.
A bunch of generalizations and false arguments....."Defenders of intellectual property rights argue that....". No, they don't necessarily make those arguments.
Patent law needs to change to it doesn't depend on people who don't understand the technology to decide how they apply.
Particularly for older patents;
If you buy a patent knowing there are potential infringers, you should not be able to make a claim against them. (hard to prove in many cases).
If you buy a patent and have shown no attempts to license it, or produce a product with it, you should not be able to make a claim.
OTOH, if you acquire a patent via inheritance or as part of buying a company, the more leeway should be given to enforce the patent rights.
So, you have no clue that asset management uses, but claim to know that you would have heard of performance measures such as capacity factor.
You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. Just stop and quit making a fool of yourself. You probably don't even know what asset management folks do.
Slashdot Mirror
I would say that if you could find a "Supermodels Who Love Environmentalists" convention, that would be the best place to drive an EV to.
Pre-heating is heating up the interior while it is still charging, so as to use less charge for heating once you depart. Heating takes a lot of energy and drains the battery faster, as I understand even more than cooling.
Of course, gas vehicles can be pre-heated as well, you just start them up a bit before you depart ( but you don't want to do that in a closed garage!)
The North Korean hackers will love this. Since they can't wash their own cars, they can wash ours.
Now that Ebola is actually a threat to rich white people living in developed nations, we can expect that new treatments will be created soon.
And if there were no developed nations or rich people, we would more likely have new treatments?
Is castration considered to be violent?
Two of your ignorant quotes;
Capacity' factor is a word that is only used in the climate denier scene and recently by marketing droids.
It is not a performance measure.
Capacity Factor is a standard industry measure that has been used for quite some time. Here is an ANSI/IEEE standard from way back in 1987 which clearly defines Capacity Factor under Performance Indexes. You cannot deny this unless you are an utter fool.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/1688...
Unfortunately, you will still deny it, and continue with your willful ignorance. For that reason I will no longer read any of your replies, but I might just keep reminding you of your ignorant contention.
Capacity' factor is a word that is only used in the climate denier scene and recently by marketing droids.
It is not a performance measure.
Capacity Factor is a standard industry measure that has been used for quite some time. Here is an ANSI/IEEE standard from way back in 1987 which clearly defines Capacity Factor under Performance Indexes. You cannot deny this unless you are an utter fool.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/1688...
Unfortunately, you will still deny it, and continue with your willful ignorance. For that reason I will no longer read any of your replies, but I might just keep reminding you of your ignorant contention.
'Capacity' factor is a word that is only used in the climate denier scene and recently by marketing droids.
I proved this to be a statement of ignorance. You then felt compelled to backpedal and shift the discussion to other performance measures. There are many performance measures, and they have their uses. They are tools. You don't say "a wrench is useless because it can't drive a screw". But that is they type of argumentative logic you are trying to pass off, and that is why I largely ignore it. I know perfectly well there are a variety of performance measures and tools. You can pine away at them all day, and I can add more.
But, back to the whole point of your original contention, it was simply ignorant, case closed.
How about automating the package delivery from truck to driver? I see the driver go back a get a package after he stops, that often takes as long longer than bringing it to my doorstep. If the truck pulled up the parcel for the driver as he approached the house, he could save quite a bit of time.
I fly fully autonomous quads.
Don't they fly themselves by definition? (jk)
You have a good point about setup. Seems that they would need a programmed drop spot for each house. I suppose over time they would have the route & drop data for all repeat customers, but the time to setup time for each house would likely required more time to complete than the first few manual deliveries.
Just drop a drone bone, and the dogs will leave the drone alone.
To be fair, what kind of words are likely to be sent - since data is only sent when explicitly using the voice recognition feature? "put channel 11", "switch on/off", "weather tomorrow" - probably not so juicy...
If they heard what I was screaming at the TV during the NFL playoffs, I might be accused of a hate crime.
Yeah, cause that would be the easiest way to eavesdrop on only persons near the TV when it is on, the prime listening scenario. Great plan!
But someone could sneak into your house, and hack your remote......and.......you know the drill.....
Let me answer it for you;
"Past Performance"
and performance measures, like CF and others, are quite useful in that regard, and for other uses as well. Case Closed.
I new you could not answer the question, a question that even a young inexperienced professional could answer. I'll ask again, and even clarify where it shouldn't have been needed, but no matter because you'll avoid answering, I'm sure.
....
The best single thing to predict performance, of any kind, is????
You just don't understand the concept, because it is a well established performance measure.
And, you don't even seem to understand how to predict performance. The best single thing to predict performance is????
I'll give you a hint... its two words.
You continue to embarrass yourself. Even if I showed you how it is clearly defined as a performance measure, you would deny what I present, or make some weaselly excuse, so why should I even bother?
Any one that says "100% Capacity Factor" in the context you used it in is just plain ignorant to how it is used to start with. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
It is quite easy to adjust for load demand, if needed, why you didn't realize that is quite amazing given your claimed expertise.
Capacity factor is not a performance measure.
Add that to the list of ignorant, stupid things you post here. That is exactly what CF is, a performance measure.
And with that, you confirm that you are not only ignorant in the energy area, but also most likely making fraudulent claims regarding your experience. At the very least, it explains why you no longer work in the industry.
You can't even use CF properly after I showed you the definition.
I read the summary and thought "wow, this is really stupid". Then I read the article......and confirmed that thought.
A bunch of generalizations and false arguments....."Defenders of intellectual property rights argue that....". No, they don't necessarily make those arguments.
Patent law needs to change to it doesn't depend on people who don't understand the technology to decide how they apply.
Particularly for older patents;
If you buy a patent knowing there are potential infringers, you should not be able to make a claim against them. (hard to prove in many cases).
If you buy a patent and have shown no attempts to license it, or produce a product with it, you should not be able to make a claim.
OTOH, if you acquire a patent via inheritance or as part of buying a company, the more leeway should be given to enforce the patent rights.
So, you have no clue that asset management uses, but claim to know that you would have heard of performance measures such as capacity factor.
You don't know what the fuck you are talking about. Just stop and quit making a fool of yourself. You probably don't even know what asset management folks do.
Its clear you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. I am done.