Like I said, I never said wind should be ignored. And since you can't refute that because NONE of my posts say that, you come up with your BS post above and still insist I said something I never did. You are a waste.
I see you have trouble with reading comprehension, because nowhere did I say or even hint that wind can or should be ignored. Maybe go back and read what I actually said instead of making yourself look like a fool.
You on the other hand have a track record of assigning the far left to anyone who doesn't fit your litmus tests.
And what was my litmus test in this case, getting a mean spirited 'attack" response with no meat on the bone and nothing to contest the point? Many liberals do that, but there are other thoughtless idiots that do as well. Maybe you are in the second group, my apologies.
Exactly. To say this implies subservience would also be implying that women are the subservient ones in heterosexual relationships. The liberals are parsing themselves into a corner.
Yeah yeah, we get it, just as all Conservatives are members of the KKK and family values people tho are actually closeted gays.
You want to use a black and white color scheme that takes the kooks and applies their insanity to everyone get's you painted the same way.
Meanwhile, have you stopped burning crosses on those chocolate people's lawns yet?
You sure do get mean when you are backed into a corner.
How does that comparison look when eliminating farming? Does Finland account for direct draws from rivers/lakes as much as the US? What other leveling considerations should be factored?
I did not say winds didn't matter. I just said currents would be a primary factor. You already stated winds were, I just added another factor that was not discussed. Wind blowing around bergs in areas of low current doesn't negate the point.
Exactly. To say this implies subservience would also be implying that women are the subservient ones in heterosexual relationships. The liberals are parsing themselves into a corner.
Its clear that Colbert sees a sexual act as being representative of subservience at a minimum, and that he resorts to heterosexual acts in hateful rants tells me something more. I'm sure he'll cover his tracks and do something wonderful for the gay community sometime soon.
There is a simple test to tell if he's biased toward using homosexual acts as insults. Does he use heterosexual acts equally or not? If he more often chooses a homosexual act to insult someone, then he's biased.
Clearly he is hateful, which is a shame. Had anyone said "Hillary is Obama's __holster", they would not retain a prominent host position on any major network. And the uproar would be many times what we are seeing here because it would be the liberals who would be offended.
And why are some claiming this is just using this as an act of submission and subservience? Is that implying that 1/2 homosexuals are subservient to their partners? Would you say that about a female in a heterosexual relationship, that she is subservient?
With most of the volume below the surface, ocean currents become a primary factor. If they can choose a path with favoring ocean currents, they can save a lot of energy.
You are making a terrible argument. Speaking in generalities as you are doing is a terrible way to argue. Nobody ever said that because something can be done it is inherently in the best interest, you just came up with that out of nowhere. I could argue the opposite, that just because it CAN be done by a larger group..blah blah.
Maybe you need to talk about the specific issue and make your case as to the best approach. It would be more productive.
Only useful data is valuable. But the whole of data is diluted with much useless data. For example, Slashdot articles have a very low DVD (data value density).
This is no blow to Trump. It shows what he did might make more sense than some (even myself) thought. If states can regulated it, then the feds don't need to. If states choose different models, then we might find the best one and others will follow.
Slashdot Mirror
According to some, it means you are submissive. I'd just call you desperate.
How about "We think we got it right this time."?
Swarm AI should have been able to predict that it would get the race predictions wrong.
Like I said, I never said wind should be ignored. And since you can't refute that because NONE of my posts say that, you come up with your BS post above and still insist I said something I never did. You are a waste.
I see you have trouble with reading comprehension, because nowhere did I say or even hint that wind can or should be ignored. Maybe go back and read what I actually said instead of making yourself look like a fool.
You on the other hand have a track record of assigning the far left to anyone who doesn't fit your litmus tests.
And what was my litmus test in this case, getting a mean spirited 'attack" response with no meat on the bone and nothing to contest the point? Many liberals do that, but there are other thoughtless idiots that do as well. Maybe you are in the second group, my apologies.
Exactly. To say this implies subservience would also be implying that women are the subservient ones in heterosexual relationships. The liberals are parsing themselves into a corner.
Yeah yeah, we get it, just as all Conservatives are members of the KKK and family values people tho are actually closeted gays.
You want to use a black and white color scheme that takes the kooks and applies their insanity to everyone get's you painted the same way.
Meanwhile, have you stopped burning crosses on those chocolate people's lawns yet?
You sure do get mean when you are backed into a corner.
So you are saying ocean currents are not a primary factor to be considered? If so, I have to disagree.
Don't travel to the US and don't do business with US companies. Problem solved.
I'm sure your shareholders will support your noble position.
How does that comparison look when eliminating farming? Does Finland account for direct draws from rivers/lakes as much as the US? What other leveling considerations should be factored?
If its is a USA visa, who else would define them?
I'm not a Visa applicant, so whatever! This doesn't affect me!
If you do decide to be a Visa applicant, I would recommend you not post "Kill the Infidels" on your FB page.
I did not say winds didn't matter. I just said currents would be a primary factor. You already stated winds were, I just added another factor that was not discussed. Wind blowing around bergs in areas of low current doesn't negate the point.
Exactly. To say this implies subservience would also be implying that women are the subservient ones in heterosexual relationships. The liberals are parsing themselves into a corner.
Its clear that Colbert sees a sexual act as being representative of subservience at a minimum, and that he resorts to heterosexual acts in hateful rants tells me something more. I'm sure he'll cover his tracks and do something wonderful for the gay community sometime soon.
There is a simple test to tell if he's biased toward using homosexual acts as insults. Does he use heterosexual acts equally or not? If he more often chooses a homosexual act to insult someone, then he's biased.
Clearly he is hateful, which is a shame. Had anyone said "Hillary is Obama's __holster", they would not retain a prominent host position on any major network. And the uproar would be many times what we are seeing here because it would be the liberals who would be offended.
And why are some claiming this is just using this as an act of submission and subservience? Is that implying that 1/2 homosexuals are subservient to their partners? Would you say that about a female in a heterosexual relationship, that she is subservient?
With most of the volume below the surface, ocean currents become a primary factor. If they can choose a path with favoring ocean currents, they can save a lot of energy.
In other shocking news, countries that grow a lot of food use a lot of water.
Also, countries that have more water use more water.
Lets be clear. More people will be able to speak English than any other language. Therefore, it will be the most commonly spoken language.
You are making a terrible argument. Speaking in generalities as you are doing is a terrible way to argue. Nobody ever said that because something can be done it is inherently in the best interest, you just came up with that out of nowhere. I could argue the opposite, that just because it CAN be done by a larger group..blah blah.
Maybe you need to talk about the specific issue and make your case as to the best approach. It would be more productive.
Only useful data is valuable. But the whole of data is diluted with much useless data. For example, Slashdot articles have a very low DVD (data value density).
It can be a good enough reason in many cases.
Isn't this essentially just running an instance of Windows 10 S?
The ISP argument will be that only the FCC or Congress have the authority to regulate these aspects of their business.
They may argue it, but it will be hard to win since they will no longer be considered Title II utilities.
This is no blow to Trump. It shows what he did might make more sense than some (even myself) thought. If states can regulated it, then the feds don't need to. If states choose different models, then we might find the best one and others will follow.
OK, my mistake, but it makes the point completely stupid. English will still be the most widely spoken language after Brexit.