Well, first off all the problem with discoveries tank is due to a manufacturing problem with the stringers, not a design flaw.
Second of all, why use SSME's? They are designed for re-use, and have restart capability that will not be needed. A better choice would be the rocketdyn's RS-68, single use, cheap as fuck, provides more lifting power.
The theory goes that a mars sized planetoid, named Theia, had formed at earths L4 or L5 Lagrangian points. As it's mass grew due to impacts, it was no longer stable at that point, and slammed into earth. The resulting debris cloud came together to form the moon.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis
I take a cup of coffee. It's probably not worth it. Face facts, in New York, your vote doesn't count. All electors are going to vote for the Democrat candidate.
The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armour to lead all customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores the fact that it was he who, by peddling second-rate technology, led them into it in the first place.
I don't think they will. The J-2 hasn't been built in years and while the J-2S (the more modern version) could have production restarted Thiokol believes it would take more than 4 years to restart production.
I Couldn't agree more. However, we shouldn't be limiting ourselves to SSME's. They are designed to be reusable. The vehicles NASA is proposing are EELVs (Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles).
They would be better served by a RS-68 it produces more thrust, is a much simpler design, a whole lot cheaper, and it's expendable!
Is it because they don't know your name without first looking on your chart?
Am I supposed to be impressed when they spend less than 30 seconds on a diagnosis, and then run off to see their next patient? I suppose this allows them to see some HMO dictated requisite number of patients in a given day.
The problem with the doctors of today is the same as the problem with programmers in the mid 90's, the field is loaded with hacks looking for money. When you find someone who's in it for the love of it, you've hit the jackpot.
"Torvalds could have done something constructive: he could have written the best damn OS [Operating System] on the planet, and believed that open source generates better things, and competed against AT&T that way," says a Bell Labs Spokespers in the posting.
And if you use source code from another project (PearPC), then you have to acknowledge it.
Actually, this is not a requirement. Remember that a similar attribution clause (the so-called "advertisement clause") in the BSD license made it incompatible with the GPL.
If GPL3 mentions anything that is not in GPL2 (ie it places restrictions relating to patent litigation etc) then it cannot be compatible with GPL2.
And who says that v3 has to be backward compatible?
Backward compatibility is very useful for API's, but not desireable for a FOSS license that has a loophole that needs to be closed (ie: the application server loophole)
I rang them up and told tem that they were going to replace the relevant bits, because it was clearly a HW issue, and no, we weren't about to install some workaround thank you. The main problem was working out whether we wanted the engineer overnight or next morning.
Hmmm... Here's how I remember it.
Sun: There is no flaw. US: Yes there is Sun: No there isn't US: YES THERE IS!!!! Sun: Uhmm, well yeah, We'll provide a sofware workaround that'll prevent half your crashes if you sign an affidavid that says "Sun has no problem here" US: Okay, we'll sign because we're desperate. when are we getting the hardware fixed you blackmailing assholes. Sun: Uhmm, well, as soon as our engineers fix it and we can fab the chips, figure 8/9 months.
If you're walking down the street, and someone beats you up and steals your money, does that mean that it's your fault for not taking karate?
No, that's a bad analogy. A better one is if your car has a recall on its brakes, you don't get it fixed, and then get in an accident, Who is at fault?
Slashdot Mirror
Well, first off all the problem with discoveries tank is due to a manufacturing problem with the stringers, not a design flaw.
Second of all, why use SSME's? They are designed for re-use, and have restart capability that will not be needed. A better choice would be the rocketdyn's RS-68, single use, cheap as fuck, provides more lifting power.
The theory goes that a mars sized planetoid, named Theia, had formed at earths L4 or L5 Lagrangian points. As it's mass grew due to impacts, it was no longer stable at that point, and slammed into earth. The resulting debris cloud came together to form the moon.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis
I take a cup of coffee. It's probably not worth it.
Face facts, in New York, your vote doesn't count. All electors are going to vote for the Democrat candidate.
click to login to http://mybank.safe/ </a>
Those who fail to understand UNIX are doomed to reimplement it. Poorly
Douglas Adams
the fact is that Google itself is copying and making use of the whole work.
I fail to see the problem here. Copyright doesn't prevent you from copying, it prevents you from copying and re-distributing.
I Couldn't agree more. However, we shouldn't be limiting ourselves to SSME's. They are designed to be reusable. The vehicles NASA is proposing are EELVs (Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles).
They would be better served by a RS-68 it produces more thrust, is a much simpler design, a whole lot cheaper, and it's expendable!
A group of whitehat extremists may become tired of lusers that don't patch their systems, and decide that they don't deserve to use the internet.
They then launch their virus and destroy on all non-patching infidels.
What, it could happen.
Weren't there some stupid dots in the name of this thing?
C:ue: C:a:t
Or something???
Honestly, this is speculation and FUD.
Nothing to see here, move on.
Is it because they don't know your name without first looking on your chart?
Am I supposed to be impressed when they spend less than 30 seconds on a diagnosis, and then run off to see their next patient? I suppose this allows them to see some HMO dictated requisite number of patients in a given day.
The problem with the doctors of today is the same as the problem with programmers in the mid 90's, the field is loaded with hacks looking for money. When you find someone who's in it for the love of it, you've hit the jackpot.
Wow, as a sofware producer, I'm real scared. I'd better give lotsa cash to BSA so they can protect me.
Seriously though, this is not news, this is a marketing campaign. The BSA speculating that piracy will decrease, now that would be news.
The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers.
"Torvalds could have done something constructive: he could have written the best damn OS [Operating System] on the planet, and believed that open source generates better things, and competed against AT&T that way," says a Bell Labs Spokespers in the posting.
Those who don't understand UNIX are doomed to reimplement it. Poorly.
Actually, this is not a requirement. Remember that a similar attribution clause (the so-called "advertisement clause") in the BSD license made it incompatible with the GPL.
And who says that v3 has to be backward compatible?
Backward compatibility is very useful for API's, but not desireable for a FOSS license that has a loophole that needs to be closed (ie: the application server loophole)
He investigates and levies charges against 401k companies.
He charges recording industry with collusion and payola.
He's the first to sign on to the microsoft settlement of 2001.
I'm confused. Somebody, quick, help me form an opinion.
Hmmm... Here's how I remember it.
Sun: There is no flaw.
US: Yes there is
Sun: No there isn't
US: YES THERE IS!!!!
Sun: Uhmm, well yeah, We'll provide a sofware workaround that'll prevent half your crashes if you sign an affidavid that says "Sun has no problem here"
US: Okay, we'll sign because we're desperate. when are we getting the hardware fixed you blackmailing assholes.
Sun: Uhmm, well, as soon as our engineers fix it and we can fab the chips, figure 8/9 months.
scrub:/# host www.doubleclick.net
www.doubleclick.net A 192.168.1.1
scrub:/#
Of course having this in my named.conf helps...
zone "doubleclick.net" {
type master;
file "/etc/bind/db.vermin";
};
Are you seriously comparing lab's theoretical numbers to something being delivered to end users?
Do you doubt that FTTP can scale higher? What speeds are they pushing over fiber in the lab? No my friend, wireless will always lag behind.
No, that's a bad analogy. A better one is if your car has a recall on its brakes, you don't get it fixed, and then get in an accident, Who is at fault?
When someone files for a patent, they are attempting to lock down a "non-obvious" solution to a problem.
What if patent examiners posed that problem to other experts in the field. If they come up with a similar solution, patent denied.
Sheesh, click on the link! It's user mode linux.