"Only seeing what you want to see is a very annoying human ability."
Which you demonstrated quite adequately. The video link is up there. Trump was talking about entering Muslims into a database, going to mosques, or different places.
Remain skeptical. Always. Including when you have to dismiss a Rush Limbaugh talking point because you acquired the information available in a simple video link, which, from your description of the events, it's not clear that you have even watched.
Visas and foreign nationals were not even mentioned, and you completely left out the very next part where he was asked, "Do you go to mosques and sign people up?", and he says, "different places..."
That's one hilarious bit of spin you've got there. Can you see the back of your own teeth up there?
"There should be a lot of systems. Beyond databases. I mean, we should have a lot of systems." - Donald Trump "Different places. You sign ’em up at different..." - Donald Trump
That takes out the context of the questions, but the context makes it more clear, we're talking about database. I don't doubt that he wants to backpedal now and cry loudly about media persecution, but that doesn't mean you can dismiss the way this is being reported. He said what he said.
Thank you. I don't care whether he backpedals or not, blaming the media is asinine to the extreme. Believing you alone have all the facts, and the full grasp of their ramifications is probably big on slashdot. Thinking very little of lowly journalists is probably big. Their job is not an exact science, after all.
But to say they are manufacturing this story is completely false. That narrative, or counter-narrative needs to die as quickly as possible in this country. By all means, remain skeptical, but do no dismiss out of hand what is being reported. Follow up, gather facts, think critically with as much information as you are able to obtain, and make your own assessment.
Republicans would prefer that you entirely dismiss the "mainstream media" and get your facts from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. It's a cancer in our society. Here is a little data that may help: http://www.journalism.org/2014...
Those blaming SJWs aren't as interested in the facts as they are playing the woe is me victim of media bias again. Trump may be backpedaling, but this story is being reported perfectly accurately, whether you want to keep your head up your own ass or not.
What? You're countering a video link with a bunch of Benghazi references? And you base your political opinions on what pisses off random people on the internet the most?
Oh, you actually said you're a Trump poster. Most, even here, start out by saying they're not before they lie through their teeth. Hats off to you, an honest bigot. "lols"
But you seem like the type who is more likely to blame the media than attempt to understand facts, so hopefully others will read this, and catch onto your party's stupid little anti-media ruse.
Nope. You're living in your own little fantasy world, sponsored by Rush Limbaugh. Trump explained how he'd sign Muslims up for the database.
The reason this is a good move is because people like you are so delusional you'll give him a pass because you would sooner blame the media than pull your head out of your ass.
Good move. Republicans are largely temporarily embarrassed millionaires living in their own fantasy world, and bigots. This should give him the bump in the polls that he'll need to win the whole thing.
To echo the other poster, there's no need to link the Tea Party to the KKK. It will only make Tea Party types dig their heels in deeper, and they're backwards enough and so distant from the facts that it's not really necessary.
Me too, man. My solution is to date one night owl and one early bird, then sex them both before and after I sleep. So I do sex like twice and then my donger is so big I can often fit in a nooner, but the gas bills for my sports car add up. I'm a millionaire but it's the principle of the matter. Annoying case is right.
No, they will not adjust their standards, which are set by societal norms and unlikely to shift. The half with a low libido will just stop screwing around altogether, and the half with a strong libido will all go to the same fewer dudes over and over again.
Why not have AI that doesn't fly the plane non-stop, but instead detects egregious attempts to down the plane, and overrides them? Or calls this fancy, distant co-pilot to take over?
Do we really want to hold our own states to the same standard as Saudi Arabia? Does Tim Cook, Apple, or anybody in the US have the same influence in both areas?
Fiorina is definitely going to run. She's pandering to the dumbest set of Republican voters.
Because they're all ate up with viruses. Their iPhones and Android devices have more bugs than ours, too, for some reason. We learn how to fix things, they're just different.
...and then test it. By all means, question everything, but back it up with relevent, scientifically sound data.
Eventually your data may help form a scientific consensus. That's how global warming came to be understood. The opposing view has been totally unable to form a gain such support.
(By the way, no, "global cooling," was never a real thing, before somebody ham-handedly posts a link about it. There are fake magazine covers out there, etc., but ignore the deniers.)
Slashdot Mirror
"Only seeing what you want to see is a very annoying human ability."
Which you demonstrated quite adequately. The video link is up there. Trump was talking about entering Muslims into a database, going to mosques, or different places.
Remain skeptical. Always. Including when you have to dismiss a Rush Limbaugh talking point because you acquired the information available in a simple video link, which, from your description of the events, it's not clear that you have even watched.
Oh my, you're going for a Godwin's law violation here. "No one will disagree that we should have a lot of systems beyond databases."
lollerz. Good spin attempt, I guess. Insofar as all spin is actually really shitty. The media has reported this correctly, whether you like it or not.
Visas and foreign nationals were not even mentioned, and you completely left out the very next part where he was asked, "Do you go to mosques and sign people up?", and he says, "different places..."
That's one hilarious bit of spin you've got there. Can you see the back of your own teeth up there?
"There should be a lot of systems. Beyond databases. I mean, we should have a lot of systems." - Donald Trump
"Different places. You sign ’em up at different..." - Donald Trump
That takes out the context of the questions, but the context makes it more clear, we're talking about database. I don't doubt that he wants to backpedal now and cry loudly about media persecution, but that doesn't mean you can dismiss the way this is being reported. He said what he said.
Again, the video link: http://www.nbcnews.com/video/t...
Video link: http://www.nbcnews.com/video/t...
Thank you. I don't care whether he backpedals or not, blaming the media is asinine to the extreme. Believing you alone have all the facts, and the full grasp of their ramifications is probably big on slashdot. Thinking very little of lowly journalists is probably big. Their job is not an exact science, after all.
But to say they are manufacturing this story is completely false. That narrative, or counter-narrative needs to die as quickly as possible in this country. By all means, remain skeptical, but do no dismiss out of hand what is being reported. Follow up, gather facts, think critically with as much information as you are able to obtain, and make your own assessment.
Republicans would prefer that you entirely dismiss the "mainstream media" and get your facts from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. It's a cancer in our society. Here is a little data that may help: http://www.journalism.org/2014...
He's being quoted very accurately. Video link: http://www.nbcnews.com/video/t...
Those blaming SJWs aren't as interested in the facts as they are playing the woe is me victim of media bias again. Trump may be backpedaling, but this story is being reported perfectly accurately, whether you want to keep your head up your own ass or not.
Thanks for posting the transcript. This story is seems like it's being reported accurately, whether he wants to backpedal or not.
Video link, for the skeptical: http://www.nbcnews.com/video/t...
What? You're countering a video link with a bunch of Benghazi references? And you base your political opinions on what pisses off random people on the internet the most?
Oh, you actually said you're a Trump poster. Most, even here, start out by saying they're not before they lie through their teeth. Hats off to you, an honest bigot. "lols"
Trump explained how he'd sign Muslims up in the database:
"It's good management."
When asked whether he'd go to a mosque, or what:
"You sign them up in different places."
Video link:
http://www.nbcnews.com/video/t...
But you seem like the type who is more likely to blame the media than attempt to understand facts, so hopefully others will read this, and catch onto your party's stupid little anti-media ruse.
Nope. You're living in your own little fantasy world, sponsored by Rush Limbaugh. Trump explained how he'd sign Muslims up for the database.
The reason this is a good move is because people like you are so delusional you'll give him a pass because you would sooner blame the media than pull your head out of your ass.
Good move. Republicans are largely temporarily embarrassed millionaires living in their own fantasy world, and bigots. This should give him the bump in the polls that he'll need to win the whole thing.
...are we doomed to forever playing with our own Python?
To echo the other poster, there's no need to link the Tea Party to the KKK. It will only make Tea Party types dig their heels in deeper, and they're backwards enough and so distant from the facts that it's not really necessary.
You're leaving out the part about my 12 inch wiener.
Don't worry...I got it. :-)
Me too, man. My solution is to date one night owl and one early bird, then sex them both before and after I sleep. So I do sex like twice and then my donger is so big I can often fit in a nooner, but the gas bills for my sports car add up. I'm a millionaire but it's the principle of the matter. Annoying case is right.
No, they will not adjust their standards, which are set by societal norms and unlikely to shift. The half with a low libido will just stop screwing around altogether, and the half with a strong libido will all go to the same fewer dudes over and over again.
Why not have AI that doesn't fly the plane non-stop, but instead detects egregious attempts to down the plane, and overrides them? Or calls this fancy, distant co-pilot to take over?
Do we really want to hold our own states to the same standard as Saudi Arabia? Does Tim Cook, Apple, or anybody in the US have the same influence in both areas?
Fiorina is definitely going to run. She's pandering to the dumbest set of Republican voters.
I'd zip them into a password-protected archive. Why the hell is this idiot expecting PKI for everything?
Too much functional fixedness. Pass.
-
Because they're all ate up with viruses. Their iPhones and Android devices have more bugs than ours, too, for some reason. We learn how to fix things, they're just different.
...and then test it. By all means, question everything, but back it up with relevent, scientifically sound data.
Eventually your data may help form a scientific consensus. That's how global warming came to be understood. The opposing view has been totally unable to form a gain such support.
(By the way, no, "global cooling," was never a real thing, before somebody ham-handedly posts a link about it. There are fake magazine covers out there, etc., but ignore the deniers.)
Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E...
If anyone was curious.