Yeah, like Daniel Ellsberg, she broke the law to serve the law With THIS supreme Court however, she won't even get a hearing, even if Trump is finally implicated, impeached, convicted, tried, convicted and hanged.
As you say, juries are made of people too ignorant to get out of that duty That said, the "probable" evidence is not actual, and it's claimed destruction cannot be a basis for a "beyond reasonable doubt" conviction of anything. The existence must be proved, beyond reasonable doubt. FAR tougher than "probable cause" which is all the state agents needed for their warrant.
An entirely private religious school like Liberty University already DOES. There is no outcry, there never has been, except for the time they tried to ban non-whites who had acknowledged interracial dating.
Thank you! Weak-minded isn't the term I would use though I think the Milner experiments demonstrate that those who can resist authority are rare, much more rare than genius. Granted, this is only my opinion based on some basic reading. I will happily read any contesting citations that are NOT alt-right rants.
No, this is not a dichotomy Private institutions may exclude WITHOUT violating anti-discrimination laws They may NOT, however, claim any federal or State funding to promote illegal discrimination including but not limited to race, religion, point of national origin nor protected political speech.
Of course But then comes the problem of PROVING the non-existent evidence actually WAS there Thus the big breaker bar to enter homes before the evidence is flushed. If the alleged culprit succeeds there is no trial.
Libertarians follow the Constitution? In what universe? The Constitution I KNOW says that every person shall enjoy EQUAL rights, privileges and immunities, the exact opposite of the"Winner take all" Libertarian pro-corporate power posture
A Harvard study from the 1990's noted that only 1 in 12 mangers was of any use, and 1 in 100 was clinically psychotic and a danger to the corporation Maybe this is why management wants only "young" talent...so they won't see the impending doom until too late.
Nice perspective, save that ignores entirely the value of institutional memory, or "Why we don't make that mistake again" learning present in the experienced instead of the rote-trained.
Color blind is only true when a black man holding a gun is quietly asked by police to return the weapon to the car, instead of killing him. Thus we know who the racist really is here.
So this is your answer to lack of skilled high tech? Move into management or be fired? Same old MBA nonsense. MOST techies are "Do'ers" instead of "people handlers" and your solution is retrain away from core competency or be fired Talk about no clue.
Piracy is wrong Control over the monitization channels is wrong Monopoly ISP services is wrong Network preferences based on income is wrong Inherited wealth exacerbating wealth centralization is wrong Fake News Alt-right fascists are wrong. There is a world full of wrong Start with the WMD liars escape from justice for the million murdered innocent Iraqis and THEN tell me you are righteous, and not before.
Oh, you mean besides the fact they don't HAVE the evidence, just a flimsy excuse based on "Testilying"? Think convenient Bloody Glove found by Perjurer.
Yeah, but how tough to mimic the destruction as a standard penetration detection, thus making it likely the culprit was a ham-fingered tech He can NOT prove he didn't mistype and that is reasonable doubt (get out of jail free card)
That's not what I'm requesting I want a kill word in every cypher, different depending on the actual encryption key Thus, any attempt to coerce a password carries the high liklihood of autodestruct And the police must not have access to the algorithym and thus unable to determine if the key is the antikey
Slashdot Mirror
I see you can't read
I see you don't know the difference between experience and years.
Ah well
Why not Hillary?
Ask a lawyer
Lack of demonstrations of intent where intent is part of the statutory definition = no crime.
Yeah, like Daniel Ellsberg, she broke the law to serve the law
With THIS supreme Court however, she won't even get a hearing, even if Trump is finally implicated, impeached, convicted, tried, convicted and hanged.
As you say, juries are made of people too ignorant to get out of that duty
That said, the "probable" evidence is not actual, and it's claimed destruction cannot be a basis for a "beyond reasonable doubt" conviction of anything.
The existence must be proved, beyond reasonable doubt.
FAR tougher than "probable cause" which is all the state agents needed for their warrant.
Got any links to those results?
An entirely private religious school like Liberty University already DOES. There is no outcry, there never has been, except for the time they tried to ban non-whites who had acknowledged interracial dating.
Thank you!
Weak-minded isn't the term I would use though
I think the Milner experiments demonstrate that those who can resist authority are rare, much more rare than genius.
Granted, this is only my opinion based on some basic reading.
I will happily read any contesting citations that are NOT alt-right rants.
No, this is not a dichotomy
Private institutions may exclude WITHOUT violating anti-discrimination laws
They may NOT, however, claim any federal or State funding to promote illegal discrimination including but not limited to race, religion, point of national origin nor protected political speech.
Well they DID vote for a 6 times failed "Businessman" to correct government after all
Of course
But then comes the problem of PROVING the non-existent evidence actually WAS there
Thus the big breaker bar to enter homes before the evidence is flushed.
If the alleged culprit succeeds there is no trial.
Libertarians follow the Constitution?
In what universe?
The Constitution I KNOW says that every person shall enjoy EQUAL rights, privileges and immunities, the exact opposite of the"Winner take all" Libertarian pro-corporate power posture
A Harvard study from the 1990's noted that only 1 in 12 mangers was of any use, and 1 in 100 was clinically psychotic and a danger to the corporation
Maybe this is why management wants only "young" talent...so they won't see the impending doom until too late.
Nice perspective, save that ignores entirely the value of institutional memory, or "Why we don't make that mistake again" learning present in the experienced instead of the rote-trained.
History of Alt Right "language"
Lie.
Here, learn something about your alt-hate speechthe History of Alt-Right language, compiled by NPR
Nothing like you bringing a knife to a gun-fight!
Actually, he's right. Read the damned 1st Amendment for once. NOTHING about free speech on someone else's property
Color blind is only true when a black man holding a gun is quietly asked by police to return the weapon to the car, instead of killing him.
Thus we know who the racist really is here.
So this is your answer to lack of skilled high tech?
Move into management or be fired?
Same old MBA nonsense.
MOST techies are "Do'ers" instead of "people handlers" and your solution is retrain away from core competency or be fired
Talk about no clue.
Wow. Talk about an apologist for age discrimination based entirely on assumptions of creeping incompetence without evidence of same
The promise of higher salaries always comes true...for the Board members
Ask Carly Fiorina.
Piracy is wrong
Control over the monitization channels is wrong
Monopoly ISP services is wrong
Network preferences based on income is wrong
Inherited wealth exacerbating wealth centralization is wrong
Fake News Alt-right fascists are wrong.
There is a world full of wrong
Start with the WMD liars escape from justice for the million murdered innocent Iraqis and THEN tell me you are righteous, and not before.
Oh, you mean besides the fact they don't HAVE the evidence, just a flimsy excuse based on "Testilying"?
Think convenient Bloody Glove found by Perjurer.
Yeah, but how tough to mimic the destruction as a standard penetration detection, thus making it likely the culprit was a ham-fingered tech
He can NOT prove he didn't mistype and that is reasonable doubt (get out of jail free card)
That's not what I'm requesting
I want a kill word in every cypher, different depending on the actual encryption key
Thus, any attempt to coerce a password carries the high liklihood of autodestruct
And the police must not have access to the algorithym and thus unable to determine if the key is the antikey