By all means, show us the facts, and that means repeatable observation available to all. Wait, you cannot as a religious person do this So I repeat, only the secular can engage in debate using reason. I give you the idiot William Lane Craig whose so-called Argument is merely the logical fallacy Petitio Principii (I don't know therefore... or "begging the question" where did first cause come from).
Wrong. The university has both authority and declared purpose which, among other things, permits them to eject ANY nonenrolled student (think homeless wanderers) at will for violating the declared purpose of the University set down in the Charter.
NOT like a park at all.
Do try again!
They are demeaning the value of the University reputation for scientific evidence AND the university is not a PUBLIC forum (that's why they charge tuition).
No, this is NOT about 'free speech', this is about propaganda using the University's good name and reputation.
Until it happens, all claims for any god simply fail the test of reality, that is, something observable to any person who duplicates the conditions of the observation
This isn't about free speech. The idiots can make whatever claim they wish but NOT using the School in propaganda. Most socialists, like most Capitalist Running Dogs, can be convinced by evidence (see David Brooks and Milton Friedman for examples of both) Religionists cannot, therefore have no place in claiming to 'debate'
Actually, all of them (christian organizations on campus) must submit to the campuswide antidiscrimination directives, so YES YOU ARE WRONG and know nothing about campus life anywhere in the Publicly Funded Colleges and Universities
Creationism is not an opinion in the academic sense of the word It is propaganda, nothing else The Nazis cannot hold rallies there and claim University Academic success? Neither can the cross-worshipping-sex-haters.
When he spoke at Georgetown about civil seizure, standards of evidence and double jeopardy, his answer was, and here I paraphrase, No one is being punished. The money is being punished and so the Constitution does not apply. Think about it next time you have a few dollars in your bank account from the sale of that old car in your front yard. they can take it all for no reason whatever, thanks to Scalia et al..
Gave you the link from THAT TIME. The only revisionism was your claim that SADDAM ejected the inspectors As the NY Times story illustrated (as quoted by USA today), it was BUSH who gave the order. Bush had no right at all to remove those NON WEAPONS, those DECAYED LEFTOVERS that were fully declared by Saddam's Government and the intel handed to Blix Just the way it works if you actually remember History instead of FAux Lies.
Sorry, you got it wrong. Saddam did NOT toss out the inspectors. Bush ordered them out to prevent hostages when his "Shock and Awe" killing of 15,000 Innocent Iraqis began.
Here, enjoy. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com...
Notice? NO demand by Saddam to remove the inspectors
This is a coordinated conspiracy by several agencies acting in common to violate antitrust law Why is anyone talking anything but how many years imprisonment for all of senior management for all companies involved? Seriously, you want honest companies obeying the law, ENFORCE THE LAW with maximum penalties for all involved. ALL. If Larry Ellison really did conspire, he belongs in prison, 100% of his income for the last 18 years seized, 300% of corporate gains attributed to lost wages seized and all HR and accountants involved imprisoned or flipped. The evidence will be relinquished by the small fry and the bosses will burn and THEN this kind of criminal conspiracy will not happen again Too little law applied to too many too big 1% is how America crashed in 2001 and 2007. Let's not repeat stupid
So... you missed the whole "5 years gone by and Saddam cooperated with inspections and the U.N. inspectors were withdrawn ad BUSH's command for fear they would be hostages when Bush's attack started all while Blix documented full compliance by Saddam"? What, were you sleeping?
"help women be more productive as human beings" is NOT the same as the result of this process. What Apple et al are doing is helping women be more PROFITABLE FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS as work units, not as Human Beings. Seriously, if "human being" really means "Work Unit" to these people, maybe it is time to find another employer.
YOu forget, I AM TALKING to 3rd Graders, the people who scream "Keep your government hands off my medicare" so something impactful and sarcastic is called for to get their attention.
Less hours, so the burnout and failure rate would go down. Which, surprlsingly, is exactly what happened Post-Strike when Raygun initiated the national slowdown until he could work in his scab labor.
Right. They walked off without one second of warning, no prior negotiations and no days to prepare.
Oh, wait, that is false. What DID happen was Raygun saved his bacon by putting overworked, out of practice supervisors on the desk, replacing supervisors with persons entirely unfamiliar with ATC, and then ramming through at least 4 unqualified ATC's. Our Near Strike Events are WAY up and the burnout rate is even WORSE than it was. so, what do we know? Another republican drinking the Kool-aide won't change the history.
Wrong. Vote was 156 Repigs "Aye", 10 no, vs. 271 Demo "Aye" and 16 no. A higher, FAR higher percentage of repigs voted FOR TARP than did Democrats. https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/111-2009/h26
So you agree, Raygun unnecessarily risked American lives to further his anti-American ideal of Big-Boss-Is-Right Capitalism?
Well, that was a breakthrough!
The first Tokamak was circa 1959. They don't work. Plasma instabilities in self-heating arrays always collapse chaotically. LFTR's cannot work. They MUST have an external neutron source or,,,drumrolll please, why is 233U not sold to enrich yellowcake? See? Or used in bombs? Sorenson can kiss my rosy red rectum, they don't work
Slashdot Mirror
By all means, show us the facts, and that means repeatable observation available to all.
Wait, you cannot as a religious person do this
So I repeat, only the secular can engage in debate using reason.
I give you the idiot William Lane Craig whose so-called Argument is merely the logical fallacy Petitio Principii (I don't know therefore... or "begging the question" where did first cause come from).
Wrong. The university has both authority and declared purpose which, among other things, permits them to eject ANY nonenrolled student (think homeless wanderers) at will for violating the declared purpose of the University set down in the Charter.
NOT like a park at all.
Do try again!
They are demeaning the value of the University reputation for scientific evidence AND the university is not a PUBLIC forum (that's why they charge tuition). No, this is NOT about 'free speech', this is about propaganda using the University's good name and reputation.
Until it happens, all claims for any god simply fail the test of reality, that is, something observable to any person who duplicates the conditions of the observation
Only secularists are convinced by the facts and are amenable to change thus, YES, reason and debate are only available to the secular.
This isn't about free speech. The idiots can make whatever claim they wish but NOT using the School in propaganda.
Most socialists, like most Capitalist Running Dogs, can be convinced by evidence (see David Brooks and Milton Friedman for examples of both)
Religionists cannot, therefore have no place in claiming to 'debate'
Actually, all of them (christian organizations on campus) must submit to the campuswide antidiscrimination directives, so YES YOU ARE WRONG and know nothing about campus life anywhere in the Publicly Funded Colleges and Universities
You nailed it
REASONED debate
Creationists admit they can NEVER be convinced
There went reason and debate
Creationism is not an opinion in the academic sense of the word
It is propaganda, nothing else
The Nazis cannot hold rallies there and claim University Academic success?
Neither can the cross-worshipping-sex-haters.
Not if Scalia is allowed to rewrite the Constitution...again.
When he spoke at Georgetown about civil seizure, standards of evidence and double jeopardy, his answer was, and here I paraphrase, No one is being punished. The money is being punished and so the Constitution does not apply.
Think about it next time you have a few dollars in your bank account from the sale of that old car in your front yard.
they can take it all for no reason whatever, thanks to Scalia et al..
Gave you the link from THAT TIME.
The only revisionism was your claim that SADDAM ejected the inspectors
As the NY Times story illustrated (as quoted by USA today), it was BUSH who gave the order.
Bush had no right at all to remove those NON WEAPONS, those DECAYED LEFTOVERS that were fully declared by Saddam's Government and the intel handed to Blix
Just the way it works if you actually remember History instead of FAux Lies.
Sorry, you got it wrong. Saddam did NOT toss out the inspectors. Bush ordered them out to prevent hostages when his "Shock and Awe" killing of 15,000 Innocent Iraqis began.
Here, enjoy.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com...
Notice? NO demand by Saddam to remove the inspectors
This is a coordinated conspiracy by several agencies acting in common to violate antitrust law
Why is anyone talking anything but how many years imprisonment for all of senior management for all companies involved?
Seriously, you want honest companies obeying the law, ENFORCE THE LAW with maximum penalties for all involved. ALL.
If Larry Ellison really did conspire, he belongs in prison, 100% of his income for the last 18 years seized, 300% of corporate gains attributed to lost wages seized and all HR and accountants involved imprisoned or flipped.
The evidence will be relinquished by the small fry and the bosses will burn and THEN this kind of criminal conspiracy will not happen again
Too little law applied to too many too big 1% is how America crashed in 2001 and 2007. Let's not repeat stupid
So... you missed the whole "5 years gone by and Saddam cooperated with inspections and the U.N. inspectors were withdrawn ad BUSH's command for fear they would be hostages when Bush's attack started all while Blix documented full compliance by Saddam"?
What, were you sleeping?
As always, be afraid of government....especially government by the Board Members!
As opposed to what? Having Andrew the Mullet Wearing Biker drone spread his defective but white genes around?
"help women be more productive as human beings" is NOT the same as the result of this process.
What Apple et al are doing is helping women be more PROFITABLE FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS as work units, not as Human Beings.
Seriously, if "human being" really means "Work Unit" to these people, maybe it is time to find another employer.
YOu forget, I AM TALKING to 3rd Graders, the people who scream "Keep your government hands off my medicare" so something impactful and sarcastic is called for to get their attention.
Less hours, so the burnout and failure rate would go down. Which, surprlsingly, is exactly what happened Post-Strike when Raygun initiated the national slowdown until he could work in his scab labor.
Right. They walked off without one second of warning, no prior negotiations and no days to prepare.
Oh, wait, that is false.
What DID happen was Raygun saved his bacon by putting overworked, out of practice supervisors on the desk, replacing supervisors with persons entirely unfamiliar with ATC, and then ramming through at least 4 unqualified ATC's.
Our Near Strike Events are WAY up and the burnout rate is even WORSE than it was.
so, what do we know? Another republican drinking the Kool-aide won't change the history.
Wrong. Vote was 156 Repigs "Aye", 10 no, vs. 271 Demo "Aye" and 16 no.
A higher, FAR higher percentage of repigs voted FOR TARP than did Democrats.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/111-2009/h26
So you agree, Raygun unnecessarily risked American lives to further his anti-American ideal of Big-Boss-Is-Right Capitalism?
Well, that was a breakthrough!
Oh, wait, you said LFTR's have been CONCLUSIVELy proven to work. SHow me the operating commercial scale NO uranium / Plutonium cored LFTR. Oh...wait..
The first Tokamak was circa 1959. They don't work. Plasma instabilities in self-heating arrays always collapse chaotically. LFTR's cannot work. They MUST have an external neutron source or,,,drumrolll please, why is 233U not sold to enrich yellowcake? See? Or used in bombs? Sorenson can kiss my rosy red rectum, they don't work