It didn't mention that during Clinton, North Korea's WMD development was STOPPED COLD, with UN inspectors, Seals, Video surveillance and Mk I Eyeball Surveillance for EIGHT YEARS, then Bush comes along and in 3 years while he's dicking around in Iraq ( NOT A THREAT ) our "Friends" in Pakistan are helping North Korea develop nukes.
But hey, Blame Clinton, cause you know, 8 years of shutting down the program doesn't count.
"But when anybody who has committed the grievous error of being conservative has anything to say, we learn about the essentials of using knowledge of bias to sieve information."
It's not the CONSERVATIVES. It's the Neocon Party Whores.
The difference is, CONSERVATIVES hate Bush for increasing a 67 Trillion Dollar Debt.
Neocon Party Whores don't CARE what Bush does, as long as they can dump on the "Other Team".
"Huh, never realized that you are not charged until you've been arraigned."..."everything I know about law comes from watching Special Victims Unit"
And this, Ladies and Gents, is why I don't watch Crime shows.
"But it's still true that he can only be held for a very limited amount of time, without being charged, right?"
72 hours or so, and then you have to be cut loose, IIRC, IANAL.
Of course, that was one of the anti-protester strategies used for the RNC in NYC, wasn't it? Just round 'em up, shove 'em in the hole for the weekend, and then cut them loose. MOST people will just be glad to get out, and won't pursue the lawsuit for false arrest, etc...
"congress cannot make a law that limits constitutional authority granted to the executive branch, this would require amending the constitution."
That is true.
However, the Executives authority IS LIMITED TO those things SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED.
In other words, Bush might be the Commander in Chief of the Army, Navy, and Organized Federal Militias, but he ain't the Commander in Chief of any CIVILIANS.
And, since he's not PERMITTED in the Constitution to conduct Domestic Surveillance, it's wrong.
Yeah, But only Bush could have GIVEN INTO Bin Ladin's demands to withdraw troops from Saudi Arabia, AND turn the US into the Moral Equals of Nazis, with respect to the rule of law.
TODAY, tossing someone in a cell FOR LIFE, without Equal Protection of the Law is PERFECTLY LAWFUL. What about Tomorrow?
In Nazi Germany, gassing and shovelling Jews into Ovens was PERFECTLY LAWFUL, too.
You going to let it get that bad?
DO you THINK you still have a voice? Or is it too late?
Blocked Ports, and that little move where they pull out your copper connection to the street ( so that you're NEVER going to get DSL again... ) remind us that VZ is still as evil as they ever were.
Slashdot Mirror
You using the fake GAO debt numbers, or the less fake GAAP numbers?
Dude, they're subjects of the Crown, and not Free people, like us Americans... Well, until that thing with Habeas Corpus happened...
So, explain this infringement on my rights to keep and bear arms.
"look into some good backup software, make a clean install image "
A Knoppix boot cd and the 'dd' utility makes that a snap.
Like, say, the USA since 2000?
So, tell me again about how Bush "Won" ANYTHING?
Show all work.
I wish I did, but the vendor resolved it during the initial install...
Every single damn time I think of the Saga of Jeri and Jack Ryan, I can't help but feel, what's that word....
We had a similar situation.
Asterisk wasn't properly setup for the channel bank ( Rhino, IIRC )
Using a channel bank?
"I'd like to see how privacy concerns stack up in other countries, the UK being a very good example."
Aren't they all subjects of The Queen, as opposed to Free People?
"Has most of the US populous been pegged as a terrorist "
Total unwarranted domestic surveillance justified as "Foreign Terrorist Surveillance", so yea, the Feds consider us all Foreign Terrorists...
It didn't mention that during Clinton, North Korea's WMD development was STOPPED COLD, with UN inspectors, Seals, Video surveillance and Mk I Eyeball Surveillance for EIGHT YEARS, then Bush comes along and in 3 years while he's dicking around in Iraq ( NOT A THREAT ) our "Friends" in Pakistan are helping North Korea develop nukes.
But hey, Blame Clinton, cause you know, 8 years of shutting down the program doesn't count.
"But when anybody who has committed the grievous error of being conservative has anything to say, we learn about the essentials of using knowledge of bias to sieve information."
It's not the CONSERVATIVES. It's the Neocon Party Whores.
The difference is, CONSERVATIVES hate Bush for increasing a 67 Trillion Dollar Debt.
Neocon Party Whores don't CARE what Bush does, as long as they can dump on the "Other Team".
Cron based backup with compression/encryption, rewind, bitlevel verify, send email re: success/failure.
Add a scsi controller, and Drive Of Your Choice, and sleep well.
"Huh, never realized that you are not charged until you've been arraigned."..."everything I know about law comes from watching Special Victims Unit"
And this, Ladies and Gents, is why I don't watch Crime shows.
"But it's still true that he can only be held for a very limited amount of time, without being charged, right?"
72 hours or so, and then you have to be cut loose, IIRC, IANAL.
Of course, that was one of the anti-protester strategies used for the RNC in NYC, wasn't it? Just round 'em up, shove 'em in the hole for the weekend, and then cut them loose. MOST people will just be glad to get out, and won't pursue the lawsuit for false arrest, etc...
Well, to begin, have you ever heard of Stratigraphy?
So you're saying it's NOT in there.
"congress cannot make a law that limits constitutional authority granted to the executive branch, this would require amending the constitution."
That is true.
However, the Executives authority IS LIMITED TO those things SPECIFICALLY ENUMERATED.
In other words, Bush might be the Commander in Chief of the Army, Navy, and Organized Federal Militias, but he ain't the Commander in Chief of any CIVILIANS.
And, since he's not PERMITTED in the Constitution to conduct Domestic Surveillance, it's wrong.
Since the AUMF was obtained fraudulently, ( it was issued to remove the THREAT of Hussain's WMD )
is it still valid?
"you sanctimonious liberal left-wing idiot-turds."
When you call Traditional Conservatives "left-wing idiot turds", you prove your allegience is to The Party, and not Your Nation.
Nice try, Neocon Party Whore Cheerleader.
Yeah, But only Bush could have GIVEN INTO Bin Ladin's demands to withdraw troops from Saudi Arabia, AND turn the US into the Moral Equals of Nazis, with respect to the rule of law.
TODAY, tossing someone in a cell FOR LIFE, without Equal Protection of the Law is PERFECTLY LAWFUL. What about Tomorrow?
In Nazi Germany, gassing and shovelling Jews into Ovens was PERFECTLY LAWFUL, too.
You going to let it get that bad?
DO you THINK you still have a voice? Or is it too late?
Unless you SUPPORT Torture, Secret Prisons, and Domestic Surveillance so tight the Nazis and Commies would have given their right tits for,
EVERY VENUE is needed to denounce the Violations of:
Bush's oath to G-d, Articles 1, 4, and 14 of the Constitution. amd 50USC1802 and 1805, just to name a few...
I'm surprised you had the guts to suggest otherwise, Comrade.
"By removing the copper connection, they remove a huge cost on their network."
They also remove your CHOICE.
Perhaps the INFRASTRUCTURE should be publicly owned?
Blocked Ports, and that little move where they pull out your copper connection to the street ( so that you're NEVER going to get DSL again... ) remind us that VZ is still as evil as they ever were.