We employed these hybrid electrodes for building aqueous-based symmetric and asymmetric cells that can deliver energy densities up to 55.3 Wh kg-1, placing them among the best performing hybrid electrochemical capacitors.
Moreover, everyone knows that two most common elements in the universe is a hydrogen and stupidity. Since they're specially mentioning the former, i can't but assume they're also implying the latter;-)
as copyright holders, they can distribute their code under different licenses simultaneously. So, the only question that can possibly arise here, is whether they must assign copyright to Linus just to make their patches into mainstream kernels or not? And do they want to distribute their code under BSD-style license at all.
that's what XUL is all about. you can tweak-n-change mozilla's (or ns6.0) user interface (almost) any way you want. of course it may require a bit of work from you, but the level of your control is uncomparable to other browsers. have you looked at aphrodite? visit http://mozdev.org/ and you'll see how it can be tweaked.
I see it as a slap in the face to Mozilla, since all their volunteered hard work has created a product that will line Netscape's pockets.
i'm just wondering, have you asked those volunteers if they found this a slap in their face? why should they? i don't think that anybody of them have such attitude: "i've put my hard work in the product so don't you dare making money off it"
i dont't think this technique is so much useful, at least for site visitors. dynamic generation of hostnames (if used blindly) will drag your TCP_HIT rate hell down. i believe that even load-balancing via www?.domain.com is a bad idea, and much better way to handle it is multiple ip's assigned to single fqdn.
Slashdot Mirror
From here
Moreover, everyone knows that two most common elements in the universe is a hydrogen and stupidity. Since they're specially mentioning the former, i can't but assume they're also implying the latter ;-)
I enjoy his site (www.glasbergen.com) for almost a couple of years now. He's posting a new cartoon each day, and sometimes his pieces are really good.
as copyright holders, they can distribute their code under different licenses simultaneously. So, the only question that can possibly arise here, is whether they must assign copyright to Linus just to make their patches into mainstream kernels or not? And do they want to distribute their code under BSD-style license at all.
that's what XUL is all about. you can tweak-n-change mozilla's (or ns6.0) user interface (almost) any way you want. of course it may require a bit of work from you, but the level of your control is uncomparable to other browsers. have you looked at aphrodite? visit http://mozdev.org/ and you'll see how it can be tweaked.
i'm just wondering, have you asked those volunteers if they found this a slap in their face? why should they? i don't think that anybody of them have such attitude: "i've put my hard work in the product so don't you dare making money off it"
i dont't think this technique is so much useful, at least for site visitors. dynamic generation of hostnames (if used blindly) will drag your TCP_HIT rate hell down. i believe that even load-balancing via www?.domain.com is a bad idea, and much better way to handle it is multiple ip's assigned to single fqdn.
Surely, the next project of that kind will be to compose music that way. One note per day, selected by voting :) Gonna be a great song... ;)