Slashdot Mirror


Fuel-Cell Backup Power Under Your Desk

An Anonymous Coward writes "Just up this evening on the Coleman Powermate web site: This is the first commercial fuel cell product that I am aware of. Who wants one under their Christmas tree?" I just wish the fuel wasn't quite so expensive.

220 comments

  1. Specs by nick255 · · Score: 1

    POWER=1000 Watts (Batteries Charged)
    RUN TIME @ 50% LOAD=6 Hours

    For the price, looks like it could be worth it.....

    1. Re:Specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Are you nuts??? The price works out to about $139 per amp hour... (6 canisters at $2500, supplying only 3 hours of power each at 1kw)

      You'd be better off buying a bank of rechargable lead-acid batteries and a charger/inverter. Not to mention that you'd probably be able to generate output at much more than 1kw with such a setup.

      The only benefit I can see here is space savings, and the ability to generate power indefinitely assuming that you have a big stock of these hydride canisters on hand. Otherwise, this stuff is way too expensive, and I'm assuming that you can't recharge empty canisters with utility power...

    2. Re:Specs by blkros · · Score: 4, Informative

      You can put in this much solar capacity, or more, for this price. And guess what, no noise.

      --
      Damnit, Jim, I'm an anarchist, not a F@#$!^& doctor!
    3. Re:Specs by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      By my figuring I get the device actually pricing at $6246 and individual fuel canisters at $416.67 each.

      OUCH!

      I could by a gasoline-powered generator for far less and have it run continously. Heck a propane generator would still be cheaper and better without the need to run it once-a-month like a gasoline generator.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    4. Re:Specs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think at this price it better have serial commuication and ethernet/SNMP UPS MIB support.
      I've gotta beleive that the canisters don't cost a lot to recharge.

      I wonder how long it takes to "start up"?

      For certain critical applications, this might be a good product; batteries are not very reliable and don't store well. If I HAD to have something that absolutely HAD to work, this might not be bad.

    5. Re:Specs by ndege · · Score: 1

      Alright. Please provide a link then to back up your statement. Have you considered the cost of solar panels themselves, the regulation circuity to provide a clean steady voltage, etc?

      Thanks...

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
    6. Re:Specs by mmontour · · Score: 0

      You can put in this much solar capacity, or more, for this price.

      Does your budget include all of the flashlights (and associated batteries) that you need to shine on the solar panels to get this much power at night? Solar's not particularly useful for 24/7 standby power applications...

    7. Re:Specs by blkros · · Score: 1

      That's why you use batteries to store it with.

      --
      Damnit, Jim, I'm an anarchist, not a F@#$!^& doctor!
    8. Re:Specs by blkros · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.nrel.gov/research/pv/cust-sited.html
      http://www.solarserver.de/solarmagazin/artikelma er z2001-e.html
      http://www.windsun.com/PV_Stuff/pv_pricing.htm
      Solar panels cost about $5.00 per watt X 1000 watts =$5000.00 plus batteries, a transformer, and some wiring =approx $8-10,000. I was told by a proffessional solar installer (he does 10 or more intallations a year from Maine to the Bahamas) that it would cost about $18,000-$20,000 to do my whole house. After the install I don't have to replace fuel cells every 6 hours, at over $400 a shot, either, just a battery once in a while.

      --
      Damnit, Jim, I'm an anarchist, not a F@#$!^& doctor!
    9. Re:Specs by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 1

      But if you're using up the whole kilowatt of electricity, then you need another kilowatt's worth (prolly more; up here, the nights get up to about 16 hours, which would require twice that, plus it's mighty dark during some of the local storms) of solar panels just to charge up the storage battery, doubling the cost. In addition, you need to have enough empty roof or lawn space to collect the energy...

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    10. Re:Specs by blkros · · Score: 1

      BRrrr, you live even further north than me. No solar isn't the solution for everyone. Or even a lot of people. My point is that $8,000 of initial cost plus the additional outrageous fuel replacement cost for every six hours of use, isn't a solutiion either. You can charge a couple of batteries up with your car(or truck)and hook them up to run a few things for six hours a hell of a lot cheaper than this--if not as cleanly. Hydrogen should be cheap, extraction is easy (high school physics teacher demonstrate it in the classroom), and storage isn't that difficult or expensive.

      --
      Damnit, Jim, I'm an anarchist, not a F@#$!^& doctor!
    11. Re:Specs by Belvario · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you have to run a propane generator once a month too. Generator cycling is necessary to keep the genset windings clear of moisture, not just to exercise the engine.

    12. Re:Specs by drj11 · · Score: 1

      Solar power won't help in a storm will it?

  2. Hydrogen storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do they store the hydrogen? It wasn't apparent from the page... the biggest hurdles in using hydrogen as a power source isn't the fuel cell but the storage of hydrogen. You need to keep it cold & pressurized if you want it in a liquid state, and gaseous state would require way too much space.

    1. Re:Hydrogen storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the biggest hurdles in using hydrogen as a power source isn't the fuel cell but the storage of hydrogen.
      The danger of fire would be my biggest concern with the storage of hydrogen. My mother-in-law was smoking a cigarette and bent over to inspect her car battery which had been charging overnight. Whoosh! No more eyebrows! She's lucky she has any face left at all.
    2. Re:Hydrogen storage? by uppity_frodo · · Score: 1

      from the virtual tour it looks like the Hydrogen is stored in canisters. Each one costing around $420.00!

      It also indicated that 9 canister would be required for 24 hours of operations.

    3. Re:Hydrogen storage? by ceh4702 · · Score: 1

      Interesting point. Ammonia could easily be used as a fuel; although a spill would cause real problems. Ammonia is chemically another form of Hydrogen. Another good fuel could be made from corn, or Ethyl Alcohol or something like that. I saw one site that had a plan to use borax?? When I was in the seventh grade, in science class we mixed water with a little Nitric acid and used a silver coin to make hydrogen from water.

  3. Re:I try to access it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its eeyes security software that runs with IIs

    www.eeye.com

  4. Fuel expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just wish the fuel wasn't quite so expensive.

    You mean it uses hydrazine, or what? :-)

  5. Ridiculous... by s390 · · Score: 3, Informative

    at $7,500 for the "Starter Pack", $10K for 24 hours. A generic (Honda, or something) gasoline generator is only a hundred bucks or so, and gasoline is only about $1.25/gal here in the US now. Who does Coleman think might buy this stuff? Osama bin f-ing Ladin? (Just the thing to keep your satellite phone lit in the caves on those long winter nights in Nowhere, Afghanistan?) It's amazing that they'd even advertise this product at the prices they're quoting. Until they meet reality, they'll never sell these things.

    1. Re:Ridiculous... by tap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But can you run that gasoline or diesel generator inside a machine room? You've got to somehow put it in a furnace room with ventilation or outside and run wiring. Building additions like that cost a lot of money, so this could be competitive. You also don't have to pay for the super expensive fuel unless the power goes out.

    2. Re:Ridiculous... by leucadiadude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ever hear of a new invention called an extension cord?

      You put your generator outside (roof for example), and run the power cord inside the building. Power cord and the penetrations through walls for it are orders of magnitude cheaper than ventilation ducting.

    3. Re:Ridiculous... by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

      That's fine for home use. You might be willing to put up with a jury-rigged solution like that for your home. Most companies I know would shell out for the infrastructure needed to make the generator a part of the whole power system. My concern would be with how this affected the humidity of the machine room, and whether or not any unreacted hydrogen made it out of the machine.

    4. Re:Ridiculous... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

      >Who does Coleman think might buy this stuff?

      From the behaviour of their website, no one. Clicking on the "Starter Pack" link produced a "security alert" error (see below). Makes me think that they haven't paid much attention to the purchase flow of their site. Perhaps this is more a technology demonstration than a product offering?

      =======

      SecureIIS application firewall security alert

      HTTP Request caused a security alert, please contact our web master if you are getting this alert in error.

      What is SecureIIS
      SecureIIS offers websites running Microsoft Internet Information Server a broad range of protection from common vulnerabilities, both known and unknown. Because SecureIIS does not protect against specific vulnerabilities, but classes of vulnerabilities, it allows for a much more far reaching layer of security.

      For more information on SecureIIS, please visit http://www.eeye.com/SecureIIS/

      eEye(TM) Digital Security - Vulnerability Is Over...

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    5. Re:Ridiculous... by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Well, $7500 is pricy, but only because the output is so low... while it is true that you can get a 7,000 watt gas or propane generator for a few hundred dollars, they require major maintenance: oiling every 25 hours, and rebuilding every hundred. And they tend to run at 3600 rpm, making a heck of a racket.

      The same specs, on a decent generator (runs at 1800 rpm, requires rebuilding every 1000 hours) raise the price by a factor of 10 to 20.

      So, if the problems with wear and tear have been worked out, and the power output nudged up a bit, the price is not all that crazy.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    6. Re:Ridiculous... by gnu-user · · Score: 1

      > A generic (Honda, or something) gasoline generator

      Have you actually tried that? I think you'd be in for a rude shock. Power quality will almost certainly cost you a lot more then the 10K that the fuel cell would set you back.

      Exhaust concerns aside (as others have noted) and legal concerns (any hosting/computer business that attempts to make that a real part of there strategy is flouting a whole lot of OSHA regs) I have real doubts that it would work at all.

      Having actually seen someone try to make that work (they knew better but were in a tight spot) power quality is a real killer. Both the equipment itself (how many servers are you willing to kill with bad power) and the UPS (which in the case of my freind, wisely quit accepting such wildly out of spec power) will probably fail.

      More to the point, this product is positioned somewhat oddly, it's not a UPS (which everyone here sense is your best bang for the buck) yet it's not really a generator (not hot swappable nor running at the loads that a real generator can). I'm not sure how you'd price that.

    7. Re:Ridiculous... by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      Now the link from Slashdot does the same thing.

      I suppose they got slashdotted and didn't want other customers to see that?

      Or ... well, they are using IIS through something called SecureIIS. I guess it wasn't.

      D

    8. Re:Ridiculous... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      Hmmm... if you use Mozilla 0.9.5+ / Netscape 6.2 this doesn't happen from the Slashdot-to-Coleman link. I think I know why: Mozilla doesn't send HTTP_REFERER. At least, not that I can tell.

      Friday I ran into trouble setting up a weblink to a credit card processor for one of our smaller sites. The card processor restricts connections based on HTTP_REFERER (great security scheme, no?) and I was getting an unexpected error while using Moz. Then I used Konq and IE, which worked fine. Testing on my own servers I noticed that Moz wasn't sending the header when I POSTED from one server to another.

      I don't have time to deal with this, other than to restrict Mozilla/Netscape 6.2 browsers from using the shopping cart for this site. Sucks.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    9. Re:Ridiculous... by thraxil · · Score: 1

      SecureIIS offers websites running Microsoft Internet Information Server a broad range of protection from common vulnerabilities, both known and unknown. Because SecureIIS does not protect against specific vulnerabilities, but classes of vulnerabilities, it allows for a much more far reaching layer of security.

      SecureIIS is certainly doing a good job of protecting their website from that common class of vulnerabilities called "running IIS" ;-)

      --
      Smokey the Bear says, "Strip mining prevents forest fires!"
    10. Re:Ridiculous... by bdow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People said the same thing about computers when they started out (why would I pay that much money for something to tell me how many hats I have in my closet?), but you don't see that many abacuses (abaci? I don't know) or slide rules in use anymore. The new technology is always unwieldy and expensive when it first comes out, but fuel cells could well replace batteries in laptops someday in the not-too-distant future...

    11. Re:Ridiculous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...flouting OSHA regs"? Ok, you have no clue about power generators. Most large commercial grade generators run on diesel. You can also get generators that uses natural gas. And you can vent this the same way you do with you furnance and water heater. You then can take the OSHA regs and stick them, you moron.

    12. Re:Ridiculous... by leucadiadude · · Score: 2

      Who said anything about jury rigged? This can be done in a durable, tough, and cosmetically apealing way quite easily.

      Also, if you route your conduit properly, you interface with your existing power utility box with a transfer switch for selected circuits (although 1kW should be quite enough for a standard U.S. household - don't know about other countries).

      And your concern about machinery room environmental conditions, while valid , isn't a real problem since a business would front the cash for proper HVAC systems anyway. If they don't, they're too cheap to be buying this unit anyway.

    13. Re:Ridiculous... by mbourgon · · Score: 2
      Um, let's see. Could I use this?
      1. I work on the 32nd floor of a 38 story building.
      2. I have no ability to get the landlord to run me an extension cord to the roof for my UPS.
      3. And he'll have to build me a lean-to on the roof to keep the thing out of the rain.

      Naw, you're right, no one has any use for it.
      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    14. Re:Ridiculous... by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      A generic (Honda, or something) gasoline generator is only a hundred bucks or so

      Honda doesn't make generic generators, Coleman does. Even those aren't $100. I just bought a 5kw Coleman @ Costco for $440. It's the cheaper series with the Tecumseh side-valve 4 cycle engine (instead of the overhead valve Briggs & Stratton or an overhead cam Honda).

      It is LOUD. I'd read about this before I bought it, but I had no idea until I started it up. I went running for the hearing protection (muffs- I hate plugs) right away. I'd planned to break it in for 1/2 hour, but I

      A good Honda generator in the 5kw class costs more like $1900 (Northern Tool catalog). You can get Honda engines in gensets by other mfg.'s for less but Honda makes several classes of engine.

      It's not just the noise (which is why I delved into this article in the first place- I look forward to the day when quiet generation is cheaper)- the cheap gens eat themselves up in no time- something like 100 hours for mine (it does have the cast iron cylinder liner for maybe 2x the life).

      Smaller gens are cheaper- a 50cc, 1kw, 57dB @ 7.7 yards Honda is $690 and you can run a computer off it, but not the blower motor in your furnace, your refrigerator or your septic pump (my house's big draws), so put on a sweater & don't bother with that bathroom break & forgeddabout that steak.

      -M

    15. Re:Ridiculous... by leucadiadude · · Score: 2

      If you work in the 32nd story of a 38 story building, you do indeed have no need for this, if your landlord provides reliable electric service. If your service is so unreliable or poor quality that you are seriously thinking about buying one of these, you need to move or pressure the landlord to fix his electric distribution problem.

      If you live there, then I submit you have no need for a backup power supply. An UPS maybe, but not a generator.

  6. Posted Specs for Slashdot Effect by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 4, Informative

    Fuel Cell Generator
    Creates computer-safe electricity from hydrogen and oxygen

    Uninteruptible Power Supply
    Seemless power transition keeps systems running smoothly

    Surge Protector and Power Conditioner
    Protects sensitive electronics from high voltage jolts and sags

    MODEL NO. PMXXXXX
    POWER 1000 Watts (Batteries Charged)
    OVERLOAD CAPACITY 1600 VA for 2 Seconds
    VOLTS 120 VAC +/-3%
    FREQUENCY 60 Hertz
    WAVEFORM Perfect Sine-Wave
    NOISE 65 dba @ 1 Meter
    FUEL CELL Ballard Nexa
    FUEL 3 Hydrogen Fuel Canisters
    RUN TIME @ 50% LOAD 6 Hours
    SURGE PROTECTION 360 Joules
    BATTERIES Sealed Lead Acid
    WEIGHT (LESS CANISTERS) 101 lbs.
    DIMENSIONS 27.3" x 15.8" x 19"

    WARRANTY 1 Year

    Really cool, but the fuel cells are expensive for only 6 hours of back up time @ 50%. I wonder what the unit itself will set you back.

    --

    "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
    1. Re:Posted Specs for Slashdot Effect by s390 · · Score: 2

      A big marine battery with a DC/AC inverter and a trickle charger can match these specs (or close, anyway) for about 1/10th the price.

    2. Re:Posted Specs for Slashdot Effect by JanneM · · Score: 2

      Except, of course, if the fuel cell runs out, you just replace a fuel canister, whereas a backup battery has a very definite time limit before failing.

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Posted Specs for Slashdot Effect by Eyeing_Bitter_Nouns · · Score: 1

      >Really cool, but the fuel cells are expensive
      >for only 6 hours of back up time @ 50%. I wonder
      >what the unit itself will set you back.

      Golly, I wonder...

      AirGen Starter Pack
      Model # PAXXXXX

      Generate up to 8 hours of continuous, clean
      electricity. Replacement canisters are just a
      click or phone call away.

      Includes:
      AirGen
      3 Fuel Canisters (shipped separately)
      $7495.99

      Read, then talk,

    4. Re:Posted Specs for Slashdot Effect by swaic · · Score: 0


      I couldn't agree more. Someone did a similar experiment and the results were amazing.

      http://www.hardwareoc.com/apower1.php

    5. Re:Posted Specs for Slashdot Effect by s390 · · Score: 2

      Well, this is basically targeted to California power utility failures. These are much less likely now. The blackouts were 1/2 - 2 hours when they were imposed. This product is still too expensive and too late, I think. Want to tell me how you'd justify $15+K for a home website backup? This is just a far too ezpensive solution seeking a problem.

    6. Re:Posted Specs for Slashdot Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's this thing called the "slashdot effect", jackass. Maybe you've heard of it?

  7. no remote management? by Gunstick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems not to have a serial or ethernet port.
    If you are not having it under your desk but in machine room like they show on one of the pics, you will never know if it's actually in good health.
    Also I did not see an indication that it could tell a computer to shutdown before it runs out of fuel.

    George

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
  8. oh no! by amed01 · · Score: 0

    from article: Indoor Use No deadly carbon monoxide emissions -- phew!

    --
    "Everything we say and do is right." -a mooninite
  9. Great.... If you can afford it. by stuffman64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to the website, it is $7495.99 for the generator and three fuel bottles. For the generator and nine bottles, the price jumps to $9995.99. Doing some basic math, the cost of a fuel comes out to about $416.66 per bottle, unless I am missing something major. Also, it claims the nine-bottle pack is a 24-hour supply. If you live on a non-Bill Gates budget, nobody can afford spending $3750 a day on fuel.

    Granted, this baby can supply a constant kilowatt of power. But doing the math, you are paying $156.25 per kilowatt-hour. This has to be the most ludicrisly expensive method of power generation I know. You may as well hire 10,000 hampsters to run on a wheel to supply your backup power. I'm sure they can generate just as much power, not to mention the only fuel required is cheap dried food and water. But you do have to clean up all those hampster pellets...

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    1. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by mmontour · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Doing some basic math, the cost of a fuel comes out to about $416.66 per bottle, unless I am missing something major.

      One thing you might be missing is that you are paying for two things with each bottle of fuel: the fuel itself, and the bottle that's holding it.
      For example you might pay $416 for a new bottle of fuel, but get a $350 credit when you return the empty one (I couldn't find their actual price for fuel refills, but since they're using a metal-hydride storage technology, the cost of the cylinders will be significant).

    2. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by stuffman64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok... that may seem reasonable. Except, if you look at the pic on the website, the container looks like a bottle of motor oil. Empty bottles of motor oil weigh in at about an ounce. The current going rate for gold is about $260 an ounce. I can not imagine a container costing more than its weight in gold. Of course, they can make it out of platinum, and I would be wrong...

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    3. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by CuriousGeorge113 · · Score: 1

      But doing the math, you are paying $156.25 per kilowatt-hour. This has to be the most ludicrisly expensive method of power generation I know.

      Unless you lived in California this past summer, then you mighta actually saved some money

      --
      No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft.
    4. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by leucadiadude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you are comparing apples to oranges.

      If the canister was simply priced by the weight of the raw materials of it's construction, that would in no way repay the cost of the research and development of the canister, the method to safely encapsulate the H2, and of course testing, testing, testing and certification for whatever government agency would concern itself. All this could easily be multiples of the simple cost of the raw materials - even it's weight in gold.

      And all of that ignores the cost of mining, refining, and manufacturing the canister itself.

    5. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by pivo · · Score: 1

      If you what the info movie on the site, the fuel cells look very different. I think they just didn't have a picure of the cells yet so the substituted a picture of a bottle of their camping stove fuel.

    6. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2
      the container looks like a bottle of motor oil.

      That must be a default icon for fuel on Coleman's site. Probably database generated on "product_type = 'fuel'". Yes, this is lame.

      The neat-o animations (works in Mozilla 0.9.6 on Linux) depict the canisters as blue cylindrical tanks.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    7. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgetting to close an is lame, too.

    8. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by julesh · · Score: 1
      Err... I thought the point of a fuel cell is that it is a rechargable power source with a particularly small amount of energy loss in the conversion process...?

      Basically, you don't buy the bottles as 'fuel' in the traditional sense of the word. The three that come with it should be enough for most applications - forever.

    9. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by mmontour · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except, if you look at the pic on the website, the container looks like a bottle of motor oil. [...]I can not imagine a container costing more than its weight in gold. Of course, they can make it out of platinum, and I would be wrong...

      1. The pic on the website doesn't just look like a bottle of motor oil, it is a bottle of motor oil. It's a symbol, just like the PC motherboard that appears next to this story on the Slashdot homepage. They're not actually selling hydrogen in cheap plastic containers.

      2. The storage container wouldn't be made of platinum (although the fuel cell itself probably contains some), but it could be filled with palladium or other exotic metals. More information about metal-hydride storage is here, but the bottom line is that you're paying for a lot more than an empty jar. These fuel bottles are like rechargeable batteries, except you can't recharge them at home.

    10. Re:Great.... If you can afford it. by mmontour · · Score: 1

      You can make a closed system if you have to (e.g. for a satellite), but you don't have to. In many applications it makes more sense to generate the hydrogen at central facilities, and distribute it to the customers the same way that propane or medical oxygen tanks are refilled today.

  10. hydrogen? or methanol.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUEL 3 Hydrogen Fuel Canisters

    if you see the shape of the canisters and
    know what kind of canisters it takes to store H2,
    I doubt it's H2.

  11. Very Nice by pmc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Very good piece of technology. Could be a bit better: being able to swap hydrogen canisters on the fly to give unlimited life; or being able to plumb in a hydrogen supply. This gives the possibility of using solar power during the day the power a computer and generate hydrogen, and to run of the hydrogen at night in a closed cycle. This would be better than lead acid batteries as these do not have a particularly high power density.

    The cost of the hydrogen is outrageous - you can buy a J cylinder (big) of hydrogen for about $100.

    Despite what the article says there is no way that this is the first commercial fuel cell - see this page for a manufacturer near you - but it is a great indication that they will soon be mainstream.

    1. Re:Very Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the article. It can swap cylinders on the fly. The difference in price between the starter and 24-hour kit is interesting. I know that bottles rated for hydrogen storage are expensive (but these are low pressure), since its advertised as a 24-hour supply, is some sort of adapter rack supplied to have all bottles connected. Wonder how much it costs to have the bottles filled.

    2. Re:Very Nice by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

      I doubt that you could plumb hydrogen to it from high pressure tanks because of safety concerns. I sure wouldn't want to work near a tank of hydrogen. In another post it was pointed out that the tanks are not just hollow containers and are quite expensive. Hence they would be returnable and refillable.

      This looks like a reasonable solution to keep critical equipment running when the alternative is incredible numbers of lead acid batteries coupled with a generator placed, well, placed somewhere. Not for the home user.

      I will wait for the fuel cells that are fueled by an alchol water mixture although a 1 kw unit might generate a little too much heat for an office.

      Hmmm, I wonder how humid the room would get with a couple of them running.

      --
      Nate
    3. Re:Very Nice by pmc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I doubt that you could plumb hydrogen to it from high pressure tanks because of safety concerns.

      You can definitely do this (some gas chromatographs are plumbed into a hydrogen supply for example).

      I sure wouldn't want to work near a tank of hydrogen.

      But you probably own a device that has a tank full of much more dangerous stuff - it's called a car.

    4. Re:Very Nice by OmicronTheta · · Score: 1

      I sure wouldn't want to work near a tank of hydrogen.

      But you probably own a device that has a tank full of much more dangerous stuff - it's called a car.


      Nah. The dangerous part of a volitile fluid (e.g. gasoline or hydrogen) stored under pressure is the vapor, not the liquid - if any of the vapor is ignited, it will all combust at once, giving a nice big explosion, while the liquid will only burn slowly. The amount of vapor in such a container is usually a function of the amount of liquid in the container and of the substance's vapor pressure, which in turn is inversely proportional to its molecular mass. Thus, if each has the same volume of liquid, a container hydrogen (MM = 2) has more vapor than one of gasoline (MM appx. 114), and the hydrogen container will give you a much bigger boom.

      --
      Cuiusvis hominis est errare, nullius nisi insipientis in errore perseverare
    5. Re:Very Nice by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      >>I sure wouldn't want to work near a tank of hydrogen.
      >But you probably own a device that has a tank full of much more dangerous stuff - it's called a car.
      Not likely... I've seen auto-flambe, and I've seen the Shuttle Challenger. I'll sit next to auto-flambe any day.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    6. Re:Very Nice by fireweaver · · Score: 1

      Only in an area that is not properly ventilated. Hydrogen, being the lightest gas, also diffuses in air the most rapidly. With ventilation, you would have to have a really serious leak to build up an explosive concentration of H2. Nobody with any brains would store flammable materials in an unventilated area anyway.

    7. Re:Very Nice by ScottBob · · Score: 1

      This gives the possibility of using solar power during the day the power a computer and generate hydrogen,

      When are people gonna learn that making hydrogen by solar means is a total waste of money? You'd have much, much, much more power available for a hell of a lot less money by connecting solar cells to rechargeable batteries (lead-acid, Nicad, NiMH, or even Li-Ion) than you would by connecting the same set of solar cells to an apparatus to generate, compress, and store hydrogen for a set of fuel cells. To understand why, read the "Properties of Electrolysis" segment at http://www.tinaja.com/glib/muse153.pdf

    8. Re:Very Nice by Griim · · Score: 2

      That's not a fair comparison, since shuttle Challenger was liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen all in one neat package.

    9. Re:Very Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'm no chemist or otherwise qualified as an expert, but I figure the dangerous part of a volatile fluid is the fuel vapor/O2 mixture, not the liquid or the pure vapors.

      A tank of gasoline, jet fuel, etc. generally contains 1) fuel 2) fuel vapor and 3) a lot of air, including oxygen - a fuel/oxidizer mix which is the basic recipie of an explosive.

      A compressed-H2 storage tank would have to be much better sealed than a fossil-fuel tank, to keep the H2 in if for no other reason. O2 in the tank would actually be a contaminant, throwing off the combustion calculations and posing a safety problem too. Real-world designs may be intended to keep all O2 out of the fuel tank, (or more likely, to burn the gasses in the tank, including any oxygen) in which case it may be less explosive and certainly less incendiary than liquid fossil fuels are.

      Sure, modern cars are designed to burn the vapors in the gas tank too, but as they suck the fumes out, they create a partial vacuum in the gas tank, encouraging more gasoline to vaporize and constantly drawing more oxygen in through the imperfectly-sealed fuel filler cap.

      There are a lot of vehicles and devices (fleet trucks, taxis, buses, backyard grills, butane cigarette lighters) that run on compressed-gas fuels, and so far, I haven't heard about any earth-shaking explosions. Liquid fossil fuels, on the other hand, are so dangerous they are actually used as weapons (Molotov cocktails, flamethrowers, napalm). 9/11 illustrated the dangers of liquid fossil fuels rather dramatically, but it was hardly the only memorable liquid fossil fuel horror.

  12. Hydrogen in my house? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    ...I dunno... if it's not safe to store gasoline cans or propane cylinders in my house, why would it be safe to store hydrogen in my house?

    Under "safety" they don't really seem to address this issue except to say that "hydrogen is supplied through safe, low-pressure canisters."

    And why does the unit have "sealed lead acid batteries" in it?

    1. Re:Hydrogen in my house? by cat_jesus · · Score: 2, Informative

      The hydrogen is actually stored in metal hydride pellets or powder. The metal hydride absorbs and desorbs the hydrogen and is non cumbustible. Gas and propane are more flammable than hydrogen and I have some propane in my basement already.

      Now the trick here would be to have a system that can reinfuse the hydrogen into the pellets when power is available.

      Cat

    2. Re:Hydrogen in my house? by pmc · · Score: 5, Informative

      why would it be safe to store hydrogen in my house?

      You would be amazed at how safe hydrogen is. When I was working in reseach we had an outside gas bottle room which consisted of rows of bottles plumbed in and gas lines going to the relevent lab. Some of these were hydrogen and it was decided to fit a hydrogen sensor to detect leaks and shut it down automatically when the hydrogen concentation reached about 50% of the lower explosive limit.

      Anyway, this was installed and seemed to be working. We then decided to test it by gently cracking open a hydrogen bottle under the sensor (which was on the ceiling) and watching the output. Nothing. We opened it a bit more - still nothing. Finally we opened up full and only then did the sensor start to register (but nowhere near the set point).

      What was happening was that because the room was well ventilated, the hydrogen dispersed so quickly that it only just got high enough to show on the detector. Any leak apart from a catastrophic failure would be safe.

      Propane, on the other hand, is a floor hugger and does not disperse very well. You also beed a lower concentration of it to go bang. So if this leaks it tends to hang about the cylinder and you quickly have a bomb waiting to go off.

    3. Re:Hydrogen in my house? by lightray · · Score: 1

      The reason why it is unsafe to store, for example, gasoline in your home is because the vapors from gasoline are heavy. They flow like an invisible fluid. If the vapor reaches an ignition source, it will catch fire/explode. The dangerous part is that the flame will follow the vapor trail *back to its source*, where there may be an entire tank of the stuff. Something like hydrogen disperses much more readily, thus alleviating the vapor trail hazard. However, as someone else pointed out, this thing probably doesn't use gaseous hydrogen.

      And for everyone who's complaining about how expensive this fuel cell unit is... well, are you really surprised? Things that are new are always expensive! It takes awhile for technology to come down in price after it has been introduced to the commercial market.

    4. Re:Hydrogen in my house? by miniver · · Score: 5, Informative
      And why does the unit have "sealed lead acid batteries" in it?

      The batteries are there to: (1) provide power for you (and the unit) while you're switching hydrogen canisters, and (2) depending upon the design, to even out the line voltage.

      [Lecture Mode On]

      There are two basic designs for UPSes: continuous and intermittent.

      The UPSes that you buy for SOHO use are intermittent -- line voltage feeds a battery circuit (battery charger + batteries + inverter) and goes to a relay, which switches between the battery circuit and the normal line voltage. When line voltage goes off, the relay switches; when line voltage comes back, the relay switches back. While the relay is switching, there will be a short interruption in power, but most AC equipment can handle the (very short) interruption. This type of UPS will also have surge protectors built in to filter out high voltage and spikes, but can't do a lot for brownouts other than switch to batteries.

      Continuous UPSes work differently -- the line voltage is used to charge the batteries, which run the inverter, which provides clean, uninterrupted power. No relays, no interruptions, no worry about power spikes or brownouts. Unfortunately, you're continuously charging and draining the batteries -- which significantly reduces the working life of the batteries. This type of UPS requires hot-swappable batteries, and is generally a lot more expensive to purchase and maintain (which explains the popularity of the intermittent UPSes).

      [Lecture Mode Off]

      From what I read on the site, the AirGen acts like an intermittent UPS -- when line voltage shuts off, the AirGen switches to generated power, and switches back when line voltage returns. The batteries are probably there just to provide the necessary power to start and maintain the generator, and to provide power while you're switch canisters. The AirGen *could* be a continuous UPS, with the fuel-cells supplementing line voltage for charging the batteries, but I doubt it -- everything they've posted on their site points towards the intermittent UPS design.

      --
      We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
    5. Re:Hydrogen in my house? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Are you moderating this down because you disagree with it,
      > or because it doesn't add to the discussion?

      If I had moderation points I'd moderate you
      down because of that annoying comment.

    6. Re:Hydrogen in my house? by tlk+nnr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...I dunno... if it's not safe to store gasoline cans or propane cylinders in my house, why would it be safe to store hydrogen in my house?
      Because hydrogen is lighter than air, and propane is heavier than air.
      Suppose you have a tiny leak in the propane cylinder: the propane will accumulate in your cellar, it'll reach the explosive concentration (IIRC around 5 percent), and your house explodes when something creates a spark.
      Hydrogen is lighter: it can't accumulate in the cellar, it'll leave through your roof. Therefore it won't reach the critical concentration and it can't cause a big explosion.

      But that's only true if you don't have a huge leak in you hydrogen tank.
      #insert picture of the exploding spaceshuttle.
      According to their description they store the hydrogen bound to metal atoms.
      Metal hydrides inside keep gas under low-pressure
      That's the safest and most expensive way to store hydrogen. It's expensive because you need special metals, but it's absolutely safe because the metal only releases hydrogen at a very low rate - too low to create an explosive concentration.
    7. Re:Hydrogen in my house? by sallen · · Score: 1
      And why does the unit have "sealed lead acid batteries" in it?


      The units probably has three functions within it. The batteries in the 'middle' of the process. The fuel cell is responsible for converting the fuel to electricity, probably low voltage DC current, the batteries are charged and kept charged (and provide electricity while changing cylinders), and an inverter to actually output the 110 AC current.

      But the price is totally absurd. There are units in the works, not that far out, that will produce current for your entire house, that will run on natural gas (and I believe it's expected to expand that with propane or methanol units not long after)... they'll provide continuous power, a lot more of it, and not absurdly priced. I can't see anyone really interested in units at that price point.

    8. Re:Hydrogen in my house? by muleboy · · Score: 1

      I worked in a fuel cell lab with a similar setup to the one you are describing. However, we once developed a small leak, and over a couple of hours, it raised the hydrogen concentration to 25% of the lower explosive limit (which is around 5%, right?). Certainly gave me an appreciation of the risk. Perhaps you didn't see the response because you were only testing for a few minutes, and the hydrogen was dispersing very quickly.
      Natural gas is not as dangerous in a house because the lower explosive limit is higher, plus there is hydrogen sulfide added, which alerts the humans. Hydrogen sulfide kills fuel cell membranes though, so it can't be added to hydrogen for fuel cell use.

    9. Re:Hydrogen in my house? by smartalix · · Score: 1

      Zinc-air fuel cell technology promises to be safer and cheaper than hydrogen fuel cell technology, anyway (pardon the long link): http://www.electronicproducts.com/ShowPage1.asp?SE CTION=&PRIMID=&FileName=FEBOL1%2EFEB2001&Manufact= Metallic+Power&ReturnLink=%2FSearch1%2Easp%3FManuf acturer%3D%26Keyword%3Dfuel%2BAND%2Bcell%26Slot%3D 0%26StartNum%3D1%26stype%3D%26year%3D10&MonthYear= Feb+2001

      --
      Read a preview of my novel CYBERCHILD at www.smartalix.com/cyberchild
  13. This is not yet ready for consumers by bogado · · Score: 2

    This technology if amazing and I am certainly that most of us will have something like this in the folloing 5-10 years. But it is very expensive now, and as someone here pointed out it can be replaced by a common no break for a fraction of the price.

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  14. Expensive by NSupremo · · Score: 1

    You could hire someone to pedal a bike to generate electricity for less!

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._Election_co ntroversies_and_irregularities
  15. Why just H2? by hughk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why just hydrogen? Propane/butane or methane would be much better due to their availability. You can get butane almost everywhere. Propane is well known and there is plenty of tank technology for it and methane is for many people, now on tap, being the main component of natural gas.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:Why just H2? by Silver222 · · Score: 1
      I know it's late, but I had to reread this comment a few times to figure this out:

      "methane is for many people, now on tap, being the main component of natural gas."

      If you can come up with one that burns methane...I've got a friend who could keep the thing running indefinitely on 1 serving of Mexican food a day.

      --
      "It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom. Keep that in mind at all times." Bill Hicks
    2. Re:Why just H2? by Minupla · · Score: 2

      Because H2 is the most abundant element in the universe, and much more conviently obtainable then methane or propane. Just stick a couple of leads into some water and apply electricity. More importantly, H2 is not likely to end up creating CO and killing your systems staff, which can get expensive :). (Remember, any exhaust from this thing is being vented to room atmosphere, so it has to be carbon based lifeform compliant.)

      --
      On the whole, I find that I prefer Slashdot posts to twitter ones because I don't get limited to 140 chars before
    3. Re:Why just H2? by mmontour · · Score: 2

      You'd lose the "No carbon monoxide; safe to run indoors" claim if you were running on a hydrocarbon fuel. Also you'd need to add the equipment to convert the hydrocarbon fuel into hydrogen (and waste CO2), so the initial cost of the device would be higher. It would make sense for a continuous-duty device or a vehicle, but for standby UPS applications I can see the logic of just using hydrogen.

    4. Re:Why just H2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >H2 is the most abundant element in the universe
      But it's not efficient to produce just the hydrogen.

      >Just stick a couple of leads into some water and apply electricity
      Sure, apply electricity to create H2, to produce Fuel, to create electricity. Hmmm, this is a winning technology!

      There needs to be an abundant supply of Hydrogen so the price will drop. I don't see that happening for a long time.

    5. Re:Why just H2? by Tony+Hammitt · · Score: 2

      Propane, butane or any other hydrocarbon would require ventilation for the generated CO2, which this aviods by just running on hydrogen. Its only waste products are heat and water. It's still insanely, ludicrously expensive.

    6. Re:Why just H2? by sohp · · Score: 2

      The whole idea of fuel cell technology is that hydrogen is cheap, clean, and renewable. Petroleum products like propane are limited, non-renewable resources. As they become more scarce and harder to extract, prices will continue to rise. H2 can made cheaply from seawater and solar cells. Burning hydrocarbons generates greenhouse gases and other pollutants -- bad enough outside, completely unacceptable inside -- too much CO2 or worse CO and you're down for the count.

      Here's a bit on the basic science of the technology: What is a Fuel Cell?

      As an aside, is it just me or does anyone else get a "SecureIIS application firewall security alert" on this animation URL?

    7. Re:Why just H2? by Digitalia · · Score: 1

      Moron. To harvest fossil fuels fro burning, there is an expenditure of energy. Amazingly enough, when you do something you use energy. Now, your argument should be that the needed expenditure to obtain hydrogen is greater than or equal to the accquired energy. My response would be, nice argument. However, I would then refute that point by arguing that the purpose of this device is not to provide energy for daily purposes, but to offer a clean, cheap long-duration alternative to gasoline generators in emergencies. Furthermore, I would offer for argument the various proposed methods of hydrogen production, particularly one devised by Dr. Melis of Berkeley, wherein modified algae is used to produce hydrogen.

      --
      Pax Digitalia
    8. Re:Why just H2? by Mike+Greaves · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm guessing that this is an alkaline-electrolyte fuel cell - the cheapest and most mature type. This type is also more suitable both for indoor use and quick start-ups than most of the other types. I am *not* positive that this is the type they are using - it might be a low-temperature proton-exchange membrane variant.

      However, alkaline electrolytes (probably potassium hydroxide) are poisoned very quickly by CO2 contamination, and stop working. So you have to feed it pure hydrogen - the chief downside to this fuel-cell type.

      Other types, principally phosphoric acid, proton-exchange membrane, molten carbonate and solid oxide, can tolerate traces of CO2, to varying degrees, but may have other drawbacks. So then you can reform natural gas, propane or methanol, for instance, with steam, to produce CO2-contaminated hydrogen, and use that.

      --
      -- Mike Greaves
    9. Re:Why just H2? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2
      The whole idea of fuel cell technology is that hydrogen is cheap, clean, and renewable. Petroleum products like propane are limited, non-renewable resources. As they become more scarce and harder to extract, prices will continue to rise. H2 can made cheaply from seawater and solar cells.

      Except the H2 is nowhere near as cheap, clean, or renewable as it's proponents would have you believe.
      • Solar cells aren't cheap and generate some ghastly wastes in manufacturing. (And require maintenance and replacement on a regular basis.)
      • There are few areas where there is enough clear land, available sunlight, and available seawater or fresh water to generate commercial quantites of H2.
        • If you have to pump or transport sea or other water any distance you lose more energy than you gain
        • If you haven't looked recently almost all waterfront, high insolation property is in high demand for residences.. And no one is going to build the bombs these plants will be in a populated area.
      • If you extract the H2 with generated (fossil/nuclear) energy, the cycle is endothermic. (You get less energy out of the H2 than you put into manufacturing it.)
      • Generating H2 chemically requires some pretty nasty acids and catalysts, more toxic waste...
      H2 and fuel cells are cool technologies for certain special purposes and uses, but do be sure and talk to the man behind the curtain.
    10. Re:Why just H2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuel Cell technology is based on joining Hydrogen and Oxygen atoms through a thin film of Platinum (which is where the cost comes in), it does not 'burn' the Hydrogen like a normal generator. They are very clean (the only by-products besides electricity are heat and water) and are VERY safe. If we as a society were using fuel cells as our main source of power instead of burning fossil fuels, and were thinking of moving to fossil fuels, we wouldn't do it because of the risks.
      http://www.howstuffworks.com/fuel-cell.htm

    11. Re:Why just H2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why just H2? Because H2 is the fuel a fuel cell needs to process. Propane and methane have carbon with the hydrogen, and the natural gas pipe to your home has things like odorants.

      Non H elements fed to a fuel cell kills fuel cells.

    12. Re:Why just H2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course its compliant, burn product of H2 and O2 is - oh right, water.

    13. Re:Why just H2? by sohp · · Score: 2

      Got a bite! Solar cells were the bait, but what really does it take to generate electricy? There are many ways to do it that are far more sustainable than fossil fuels. Wind and geothermal are possibilities, but we have at hand already in use a near-perfect H2 source: hydroelectric power. Water, electricity, all in one place. With a bit of thought beyond the petroleum cultural assumptions there's a great deal to like about fuel cells.

    14. Re:Why just H2? by Don+Negro · · Score: 2

      There are few areas where there is enough clear land, available sunlight, and available seawater or fresh water to generate commercial quantites of H2.
      If you have to pump or transport sea or other water any distance you lose more energy than you gain
      If you haven't looked recently almost all waterfront, high insolation property is in high demand for residences.. And no one is going to build the bombs these plants will be in a populated area.


      Haven't spent much time on the Texas coast between Freeport and Aransas Pass, have you? 100 miles of sparsely populated seacoast with a *lot* of available sunlight. Hell, they made an orbital launch from Matagorda Island, which lies along that stretch.

      Fits the bill perfectly.

      --

      Don Negro
      Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall

    15. Re:Why just H2? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Got a bite! Solar cells were the bait, but what really does it take to generate electricy? There are many ways to do it that are far more sustainable than fossil fuels. Wind and geothermal are possibilities, but we have at hand already in use a near-perfect H2 source: hydroelectric power. Water, electricity, all in one place. With a bit of thought beyond the petroleum cultural assumptions there's a great deal to like about fuel cells.

      The problem is that the US (at least) does not have all that much spare generating capacity. It's a waste to use what little we have to generate a fuel, that even at 100% conversion efficiency, will generate less work (energy) than that used to create the fuel.

    16. Re:Why just H2? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2

      Haven't spent much time on the Texas coast between Freeport and Aransas Pass, have you? 100 miles of sparsely populated seacoast with a *lot* of available sunlight. Hell, they made an orbital launch from Matagorda Island, which lies along that stretch. Fits the bill perfectly.

      Except the insolation is pretty low for this kind of application, and large amount of that area are protected wetlands / national parks / etc.. A solar plant to generate commercially useful quantities of H2 will take tens of square miles, and needs sunshine 200+ days out of the year. (The risk of hurricanes along the stretch you mention is also going to be a huge factor in site selection as well.)

    17. Re:Why just H2? by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      H2 can made cheaply from seawater and solar cells.

      Assuming you're making the H2 near where you're selling it, and you better be or you're gonna go broke, solar cells cost more energy to make than the energy you'll get out of them over their lifetime.

      A better idea, since you're near the water anyway, would be hydroelectric power.

  16. Kudos to Coleman by imrdkl · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a UPS, this thing could probably be matched (6hr/500w) by a few more lead/acid batteries under your desk. The cool thing is that you can buy these now just like any other (very expensive) generator. Coleman has invested the capital to make clean power available, and I for one hope they find a way to make it extremely profitable. (and somewhat more affordable)

    1. Re:Kudos to Coleman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clean power?

      How do you think they generate the hydrogen? The most commercially viable way to generate hydrogen right now is to use electrolysis, which requires electricity. So when you use hydrogen, your fuel source is overall no cleaner than just plugging something into an electrical outlet.

  17. Expensive? by r1_unknown · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The prohibitive cost of the generater itself - $6245.00 without fuel - and the cost of fuel will deter most people from owning one. What about the cost to clean one up? I know the Coleman advert doesn't really discuss it, but what if the (flammable / volatile) hydrogen is no longer safely contained in the 'low-pressure' containers? Filling a room with hydrogen is roughly the equivalent of filling the room with oxygen - it will combust (see references to the Hindenburg). While all this fuel-cell development is great for the environment / atmosphere / economy, I am not sure the consumer-level products are ready for distro... Interesting aside: on the Coleman webpage, you can (almost) order refills of the canisters - there is no price, no weight, and no canister dimensions...

    1. Re:Expensive? by Eyeing_Bitter_Nouns · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Filling a room with hydrogen is roughly >the equivalent of filling the room with oxygen - >it will combust (see references to the >Hindenburg).

      Um, except for the fact that oxygen isn't actually flammable.

    2. Re:Expensive? by lightray · · Score: 5, Informative

      Although the Hindenburg disaster is the posterchild for the flammability and hence perceived danger of Hydrogen, you might want to read ``Hydrogen Didn't Cause Hindenburg Fire''

    3. Re:Expensive? by pmc · · Score: 1

      Um, except for the fact that oxygen isn't actually flammable

      A classic experiment that I saw at the pyromaniacs lecture when I was at university was to burn oxygen. Yeah - we all went "huh?!" too. What the nutte^Wlecturer did was fill a large glass tube with hydrogen and light top of it (so we had a huge hydrogen flame from the top) and then introduce oxygen at the bottom of it so there was a mini-flame in the large tube that was burning oxygen.

      The point is that if you lived in a hydrogen atmosphere you would consider oxygen very flammable indeed.

      Classic lecture - everyone was just about deaf leaving it. There are hours of fun to be had with liquid oxygen, not to mention what you can do with aluminium, rust and a little magnesium.

    4. Re:Expensive? by Teun · · Score: 1

      roughly >the equivalent
      roughly is the key, in our usual room there are plenty of combustibles that we don't see as such until we introduce a large % of Oxygen.
      Horrible example is the Apollo-1 fire on January 27, 1967.

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    5. Re:Expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Hindenburg disaster is pure oil company propaganda. Hmm, let's associate a clean burning fuel with Nazis, a lame form of transportation, and a huge explosion, and then pound it into everyone's heads.

    6. Re:Expensive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, dude? The Nazis invented hydrogen.

    7. Re:Expensive? by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2
      so there was a mini-flame in the large tube that was burning oxygen.
      No. By definition, what was happening was that the hydrogen was undergoing combustion (i.e., burning). Naturally if the oxygen supply is limited, the hydrogen can only burn at a slow rate, and where the oxygen is physically present.
  18. Is this released? by Piquan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Aspects of this page indicate it's not yet released. For instance, lots of stuff is XX'd out; and if you click on "Fuel Cells" in the nav bar, you get a notice implying that the product is not yet ready.

    Is it possible that this is not the final pricing? It could be an early number, could be the very top (so nobody claims "false advertising" if they stumble across it later, when they set the real price), could be misinformation for competitors, whatever.

    Oh, nobody's mentioned numbers yet, but to get a single data point, you can get an APC's Matrix 3000XR (which sustains 500kW for about 5:15, and is in many ways more capable-- higher peak, for instance-- but obviously-- can't be refueled during a power outage). It's listed at $3750 US.

    1. Re:Is this released? by Detritus · · Score: 2
      500 kW?

      I think you are off by a few orders of magnitude.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:Is this released? by Piquan · · Score: 1

      Oops, I stand corrected... I meant 500W, of course.

  19. Simple - don't use their fuel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you buy a car from a manufacturer owned by Exxon doesn't mean you'd have to buy your gas there. Same with this. You could manufacture your own fuel for this baby with some simple electrolysis.

  20. what you have to realize by Hadlock · · Score: 0, Insightful

    many of you are complaining of the cost of a fuel canister (~415$ per). what you have to realize is that consumer demand for hydrogen fuel is very _LOW_. that most likely means consumer supply is very _HIGH_. high school economics class tells us that the cost is also going to be very _HIGH_ as a result. when demand becomes _HIGH_, the price becomes _LOW_. hydrogen will probably never become as cheap as propane (2-3$/quart, ~10$ gal), but in the future, your 1Kw generator's fuel costs will decline sharply. there's always a price for being an early adopter.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:what you have to realize by Piquan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Er... Check your high school economics textbook again.

      High supply + low demand = surplus, which means lower prices. Assuming a constant supply, when demand goes up, prices increase. (Think about it for a minute, and it makes sense.)

      To simplify to HS economics terms, we're looking at a low supply in this market. We don't know the specs of the H2 canisters, so they may be unique. Also, the users of this are probably a separate market than those who know where to get cheap H2, so it's effectively a low supply market, meaning high prices.

      Of course, if demand increases, and the free market works right, then supply will increase to meet it (since H2 is not a scarce resource). That means competition, which means lower prices.

    2. Re:what you have to realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you are all messed up with your economics! Why dont you go back to school dumbass

  21. Green Bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    what they DON'T tell you is it probably takes 10kwh of good ol' off the grid polluting fossile fuel energy back at the factory to make 1 Kwh of nice clean green marketroid sucker bait fuel for the wealthy tree hugging crowd. The most effecient (and hence less polluting) energy is the most direct - the more steps involved the more loss there is during the conversion. Untill they can drill for or dig up plentiful supplies of hydrogen in the first place your just using even *more* oil/coal/gas/plutonium to create the illusion of enviro-friendly power. (not to mention lining the pockets of the illusionists).

    1. Re:Green Bait by andykuan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I especially can't stand the comment that these fuel cells are powered by "two of the most abundant elements". Please. That implies that you can acquire H2 in much the same way you can drill for oil (the process of which, incidentally, still requires massive inputs of energy). Unless they're breaking H2O with solar power, there's some oil or coal being burnt up in order to generate the H2.

      What I think is sad is that the journalists covering this stuff and the public officials setting environmental policy are just as guilty of this energy-source-misdirection as the marketers of the technology are. How many times have we heard that electric cars are 100% environmentally friendly and will solve all of our pollution problems? Where do these people think electricity comes from?

      Now if someone will merge solar power into the equation, then we'd be on to something. If Coleman provided a means to refuel those H2 canisters yourself you could hypothetically power the refueling device with a solar array. Now THAT would be environmentally friendly.

    2. Re:Green Bait by egor+duda · · Score: 1

      Moreover, everyone knows that two most common elements in the universe is a hydrogen and stupidity. Since they're specially mentioning the former, i can't but assume they're also implying the latter ;-)

    3. Re:Green Bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I especially can't stand the comment that these fuel cells are powered by "two of the most abundant elements". Please. That implies that you can acquire H2 in much the same way you can drill for oil (the process of which, incidentally, still requires massive inputs of energy). Unless they're breaking H2O with solar power, there's some oil or coal being burnt up in order to generate the H2."

      Wow talk about a US centric vision there. Some of us have hydroelectric, windpowered, geothermal, solar powered and nuclear production capacity. I will concede that at the price they are charging for fuel, they had better be using one of those methods rather than coal or gas.

      "If Coleman provided a means to refuel those H2 canisters yourself you could hypothetically power the refueling device with a solar array. Now THAT would be environmentally friendly."

      And far more expensive AND less safe. Thus I'd rather have them be the keepers of the canisters producing them at a lower cost with environmental assurances.

    4. Re:Green Bait by RussGarrett · · Score: 2

      No they're not 100% environmentally friendly, and the fact is Hydrogen *will* be obtained from fossil fuels, but it is much more environmentally friendly to burn all the fossil fuels centrally (i.e. in power stations, which have much more carefully-controlled emmission standards), than it is to ship fuel out to household generators, or whatever, which are inherently less efficient than larger power stations.

      Also, when the relevant authorites take it upon themselves to do something about greenhouse gas emmissions , the switch to alternative power is much more cost-effective and easy if it's done centrally.

      On a related note, and slashdot has covered this before, GE is working on a home fuel cell which uses the methane from natural gas:

      http://www.gepower.com/dhtml/distributed_power/e n_ us/microgen/index.jsp/

      It's potentially much more interesting and cleaner (not to mention cheaper) than the coleman cell.

    5. Re:Green Bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting sick of this broken logic.

      Maybe it does, today, recharge from old-fashioned energy sources. But it doesn't have to. They can transparently switch to generating hydrogen using something clean like nuclear, solar, etc. But if you have a gasoline generator, you can never upgrade the upstream -- it will always require gasoline. That's what's so good about fuel cells.

      Here's a software equivalent. Suppose you have software that uses Win32 API. (Except for WINE) the underlying OS will always be Microsoft. Then someone proposes software that uses the Java API. You would complain, "Yeah, but you're still going to be running it under Windows, so it will still crash often, put money in Bill's pocket, etc." You gota realize that once you have enough people using the new intermediate form (Java API, hydrogen) then you can start diddling with the lower levels, and replace their Windows and fossil fuels, with Linux and solar.

      But you can't ever upgrade the technology if the end level is still using Win32 apps and gasoline engines.

  22. Re:I try to access it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mirrored the page on GeoCities

    So much for copyright...

  23. Snakeoil by gandalf_grey · · Score: 0, Troll
    Hmmmmm. I wonder if the fuel is just water that they are selling at > $400.00 a pop?

    Laugh, it's funny.

    --
    Mmmmmmm. Floor pie!
    1. Re:Snakeoil by scorcherer · · Score: 1
      I wonder if the fuel is just water that they are selling at > $400.00 a pop?

      They're burning a combination of hydrogen and oxygen. 'Nuff said.

      --

      --
      The Cap is nigh. Time to get a fresh new account.

  24. How fuel cells work by fireboy1919 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hydrogen, being the lightest element, doesn't go liquid until close to absolute zero at standard pressure. Even if you make the pressure dangerously high, the refrigeration will still keep it from being worth it to force it into the liquid state. An oxygen molecule is 16 times the size, but it still takes some work to make liquid oxygen, and the pressure would once again be dangerous.

    How do they not take up too much space, as you said? Fuel cells are extremely efficient because rather than producing pneumatic energy from combustion which is then converted to electrical energy, they essentially make a battery out of them that fuses hydrogen and oxygen to produce electricity. But they still don't usually store hydrogen or oxygen.

    Fuel cells usually have a liquid forms - these are produced by dissolving or chemically combining hydrogen with less electropositive and negative elements (making an acid and a base), and then removing the hydrogen from this right before it is needed. Typically, the hydrogen is removed from an alcohol. Oxygen is just taken straight out of the air.

    Here is a good summary of fuel cells, if you want to know more.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  25. SOUND by TinheadNed · · Score: 1

    Do I read this right? 65dB sounds pretty horrendous to me. Surely fuel cells aren't supposed to sound that bad?

    For this price, buy a lot of car batteries and a transformer. Charge it up, ensure it's topped up, and it'll go much cheaper without any CO poisioning or danger of blowing up and taking your office block with you. It's certainly kinder to the environment, and if you want to be extra good, get a green tariff from your electricity suppliers. Which you should have done anyway if you're going to get this picky over how clean it is.

    Nice to see fuel cells turning up, but I honestly don't believe theat this is actually a commercial application of them. Overpriced and underspecced. Apart from the amount of power it supplies. But you could daisychain UPSes for half the price.

    Widget

    1. Re:SOUND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same deal as with your computer, it (mostly) doesn't make the sound, but the cooling does. Burning hydrogen into water generates a whole lot of heat and there's no way of avoiding that, all you can do is have coolers to blow the heat away.

    2. Re:SOUND by z19752002 · · Score: 1

      I have to point out that a large bank of car (lead-acid) batteries is actually a serious explosion hazard due to the hydrogen gas emitted during charging. Such batteries are not particularly friendly to the environment (lead and sulfuric acid). Also, the Airgen is powered by a fuel cell so there is no CO.

  26. Five little words from History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Houston we have a problem'. Just kidding, but that problem was caused by a fuel cell burning H & O2 together. We generated the gasses by electrolysis back in chemistry classes long before Apollo 13 and setoff nice little burps in the class by introducing flame to canisters holding the hydrogen gas just to watch water vapor form on the sides. And to make a nice little bang that stirred things up in the halls.

    1. Re:Five little words from History by cmat · · Score: 1

      Apollo 13 SM explosion: caused by a malfunctioning (or triggered, can't remember exactly) relay. The only thing the fuel cells had abything to do with the explosion was being on the same ship.

      Cheers,
      Chris

      --
      -- Humans, because the hardware IS the software.
    2. Re:Five little words from History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apollo 13 had an electrical problem with the fan used to stir one of the LOX tanks. The wiring was overloaded during a prelaunch test, the overload wasn't detected, and when that circuit was next activated, it sparked in the tank and all the wiring & insulation burned explosively, and they had an exciting next few days.

    3. Re:Five little words from History by rela · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the fuel cells, it was in fact a relay, as you say. The actual relay failed well before the trip into space began, turning a test run of the oxygen tanks. IIRC the relay was meant for a much lower voltage than the test equipment used. The relay ended up becoming fused open, causing a heater/fan combo inside the tank to be stuck on, melting insulation and generally screwing the equipment inside the tank all to hell. They later replaced the relay, but nothing else. The crew of the ship activated the heater/fan as part of routine proceedure in-flight, a spark happened, the components of the system, sitting in a bath of liquid oxygen as they were, burned explosively. Boom.

  27. I need this to charge the batteries on my Ginger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What a gas... put a tow sled on Ginger, use it to carry the fuel cell and go coast to coast without stopping except for burgers at Checkers [Gotta eat] and potty breaks [Gotta poo after the burgers]... who'll be the first?

  28. Is it the fuel that's expensive? by mr.e · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone seems to be assuming that the because the price per cannister works out high the fuel is really expensive. I would have thought they would have a similar system to calor gas (bottles propane/butane) where the cannister is more expensive than the fuel _but_ is reusable, so if you want 9 you pay a lot (for the 9 bottles) after that the fuel is cheap.
    I guess we'll wait and see.

  29. Canisters are expensive, not fuel... by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's the tanks to hold the high pressure hydrogen while being safe enough to be kept indoors that are expensive. The hydrogen is cheap...

    This isn't bad for something that can be used indoors. It's also especially good for extreme environments where it's too cold outside for a gas powered generator to start in the winter.

  30. Handicap access by 10.0.0.1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Perfect signwave electricity to protect sensitive electronics"

    This must be so that deaf people can use the electricity, too.

    --
    forth ?love if honk then
    1. Re:Handicap access by Kwikymart · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "Perfect signwave electricity to protect sensitive electronics"

      I prefer cosine(x - Pi/2) waves personally

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
  31. Fuel cells don't start instantly by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Informative

    It takes a fair bit of time for a fuel cell to start making power after you start the fuel feed. The batteries are there to a) allow the unit time to come up and b) to allow the unit to respond to surges like your monitor coming up.

  32. In case of hydrogen leak... by Max+Hyre · · Score: 3, Informative
    You ask
    [W]hat if the (flammable / volatile) hydrogen is no longer safely contained in the 'low-pressure' containers?

    If you really wanna know, their advice (from this fascinating page is:

    Problem: Hydrogen sensor has detected a fuel leak. The AirGen will cease operation immediately.

    Action Required:

    Move mode switch to MANUAL position, depress reset button, open doors and windows in the vicinity and evacuate the area. Call Customer Service at 1-800-445-1805 for further instructions.

    Anyone remember the Bloom County strip in which the black genius kid asks his parents to ``Move away from the basement'' while he tests his nuclear experiment? When asked ``How far?'', he suggests New Jersey.

    --
    I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/
  33. ten years ago ... by Erris · · Score: 2
    Osama bin f-ing Ladin? (Just the thing to keep your satellite phone lit in the caves on those long winter nights in Nowhere, Afghanistan?)

    Funny you should say that. I can imagine a similar conversation just twelve years ago.

    Inventory clearance, Area 53, 1989

    CLERK #1 (C1): Carbon composite toilet seats, 200?
    CLERK #2(C@): Ship to Lockheed.
    C1: Titanium hammers with gold anodized grips?
    C2: Ship to General Dynamics.
    C1: Portable fuel cells, 50, with starter pack, 500?
    C2: Ship to OBL via Donkey Tain.
    C1: What the fuck?
    C2: Who cares, here are the lables.

    Sold!

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  34. then youd be a fucking moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    asshole.

  35. Not even close to being the first by inicom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    GE has been selling their fuel cell systems for over a year. Sizes from whole house residential systems to commercial building-sized units.

    They use propane (or natural gas?) and extract the hydrogen from there. Still have the problem of storage, but at least propane/natural gas storage is common and suppliers abound.

    --
    -a.e.mossberg
  36. APC sells UPSes for a whole lot less by tdyson · · Score: 1

    A quick pop over to APC shows that a Smart-UPS 1000 XL + (1)UXBP24 Battery Unit will have similar performance and only cost $1,600. Can you say, "Not ready for prime time."?

  37. think mainframes vs. PC's by mlas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, this thing is expensive, seemingly inefficient, and probably impractical... for now. But keep in mind a few things:

    First of all, Ballard (the company that makes the fuel cell in this thing) has said all along that they're going to have the really practical consumer devices in the market in 2005 (I think it's in their annual report, if memory serves). I think anything you see out there earlier is going to be a test product to smooth out the edges in production.

    The infrastructure to support hydrogen fuel (the price of those canisters, for example) is one of the things that needs to be smoothed out as well. The price of fuel should come WAY down with centralized production.

    Ballard fuel cells can also run on other fuels (methanol, for one) but at a reduced efficiency and with a slight hydrocarbon emission (still something on the order of 3-5% of what comes out of a combustion engine, but enough that you couldn't run one in a closed room).

    Yes, hydrogen fuel takes energy to produce, but so does fossil fuel extraction and then once you've got, say, gasoline, it gets burned inefficiently and with lotsa nasty waste products. I know cars seem to be getting more efficient all the time, but every car I know of requires a separate system to keep the engine cool (read: waste heat) and I wouldn't put my lips on a tailpipe. Fuel cells do their thing at 75-80 degrees F, and when hydrogen-fueled, the only output is distilled H20. That's it.

    Once practical devices come to market , they'll have the potential of decentralizing power, with that huge advantage of EFFICIENCY. And aside from the abovementioned advantages, don't forget to factor in power loss from transmission through wires. A world where fuel cells are practical everyday devices is nothing less than a PC revolution for power: power plants for all! Think an power Gnutella as opposed to the power grid. After all, I'm sure some folks were saying "Two thousand dollars for 64K of RAM? These things'll never catch on" twenty years ago...

    --
    "Luck is the residue of design" --Branch Rickey
  38. other sources of fuel cell energy... by john_uy · · Score: 2, Informative

    i did some research years ago about fuel cells. the viable solution is to buy the fuel cell generator that provides 200kwatts from UTC Fuel Cells.

    this is actually a cool device that allows source from methane or natural gas.

    they also have numerous installations made.

    although at this time, i am not sure if there are other companies that have created generators made from fuel cells.

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  39. $$$ is why they haven't been adopted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No and I don't mean oil companies trying to make their last bit of profit. Everything happens in the world because of the American market. The whole of pathetic Europe isn't going to make fuel cells popular. It's going to take the American consumer and a combination of need and a reasonable price before these are viable. They still just cost to much and frankly seem to be ready yet.

  40. Firewall by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

    Nice firewall error when you go to there site now.

  41. Hmmm.... security alert? by Telek · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    SecureIIS application firewall security alert

    HTTP Request caused a security alert, please contact our web master if you are getting this alert in error.

    ---

    What is SecureIIS
    SecureIIS offers websites running Microsoft Internet Information Server a broad range of protection from common vulnerabilities, both known and unknown. Because SecureIIS does not protect against specific vulnerabilities, but classes of vulnerabilities, it allows for a much more far reaching layer of security.


    Is it possible that if HTTP_REFER == "www.slashdot.org" then they classify that as a "potential security risk"? This is Microsoft software after all ... ;P

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
    1. Re:Hmmm.... security alert? by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      If they blocked us by testing their HTTP_Refer that would be the dumbest thing that they could of done. We are an audience that is really excited about this technology.

      Who are they the fuel cell nazi:
      "No Fuel Cell for you!"

    2. Re:Hmmm.... security alert? by Karma+50 · · Score: 1

      They're not checking referer. That page, and just that page, are blocked whereever you come from. The rest of their site is up.

      --
      http://www.thehungersite.com
    3. Re:Hmmm.... security alert? by julesh · · Score: 1

      "This is Microsoft software after all ... "

      Do you really think that a piece of MS software would say 'SecureIIS offers websites running Microsoft Internet Information Server a broad range of protection from [known vulnerabities]'?

      That's tantamount to admitting responsibility!

    4. Re:Hmmm.... security alert? by Bryan+Andersen · · Score: 1

      Looks like something in the eEye security setup isn't configured right. Maybe it is protecting the server from being DOSed by blocking access to frequently requested web pages. :)

    5. Re:Hmmm.... security alert? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why does Microsoft say every Windows release 'improves stability'? ;)

      Varis

  42. This is a new error one ... by dougmc · · Score: 2
    This is what I get from http://www.colemanpowermate.com/fuelcell/airgen.sh tml ...
    SecureIIS application firewall security alert


    HTTP Request caused a security alert, please contact our web master if you are getting this alert in error.


    What is SecureIIS
    SecureIIS offers websites running Microsoft Internet Information Server a broad range of protection from common vulnerabilities, both known and unknown. Because SecureIIS does not protect against specific vulnerabilities, but classes of vulnerabilities, it allows for a much more far reaching layer of security.


    For more information on SecureIIS, please visit http://www.eeye.com/SecureIIS/

    eEye? Digital Security - Vulnerability Is Over...
    Yes, the Vulnerability is over! I cannot view the web page on their product. Guess I can't click on `Buy'! eEye saves the day and my pocketbook from this particular class of vulnerability!
    1. Re:This is a new error one ... by Reziac · · Score: 1
      M$IIS servers that are slashdotted or having a file-not-found moment sometimes cough up a generic message like that.

      Or maybe someone just deployed the new M$ ISA firewall/proxy server and has a wee little config problem!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:This is a new error one ... by Publicus · · Score: 1

      Got this in Mozilla.

      Security alert! You are not using an insecure browser, therefore you cannot access a page from IIS! Download Microsoft Internet Explorer to view this site!

      Ok, maybe thats a strech, but I'm bitter because my job is to keep workstations secure, and I have to support IE, and it just sucks!

      --

      My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

  43. Totally Unfeasable by foxxtrot · · Score: 1

    I know people who work for the company that leads Fuel Cell research (Avista Labs), and I've heard them say that the technology is not yet feasable for normal use. Sure, they've come a long way over the past few years, but the units are simply too expensive to be worth trying to market.

    --
    -- this .sig is my .sig it is not your .sig if you claim it I
    1. Re:Totally Unfeasable by mmontour · · Score: 1

      I know people who work for the company that leads Fuel Cell research (Avista Labs), and I've heard them say that the technology is not yet feasable for normal use.

      Then maybe they aren't actually the leaders in fuel cell research...

      Of course I'm a bit biased, as some of my former classmates work for Ballard.

  44. Light up your house by ian_po · · Score: 1

    Who wants one under their Christmas tree?
    Sure I have more holiday lights up than the Johnsons, but do you really think my Christmas tree needs to withstand a power outage too?
  45. Great Customer Relations by ELBnet · · Score: 1
    Thought you'd all enjoy this response to an email I sent pointing out the site was responding with an error when trying to view the page:

    Thank you for your interest in Coleman Powermate's new fuel cell generator. You are getting error messages because the pages that you are trying to view are restricted and currently offlimits. The fuel cell pages have been removed from the server.

    Please keep in mind that this is copyrighted material. Any retransmission of the material without the written consent of Coleman Powermate is strictly prohibited.

    Please contact me if you have any questions.

    Jon Hoch - HochJ@email.sunbeam.com


    Why must response be a "We'll sue you!!"

    --
    -- I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken
  46. SecureIIS blocks slashdot by GodSpiral · · Score: 1

    New MS security measures include blocking any access to its servers by any computer that may have ever come into contact with Linux.

  47. sony, honda and others have a solution for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and it's called limited production.

    abio, vaio picture book, honda NSX, and so many other products.

    Companies understand simple macro economics...
    The average ./ poster? Close, but no cigar.
    Your average consumer? Completely ignorant.

  48. Recharging by AaronW · · Score: 2

    It's too bad that it can't use AC to refuel itself
    by cracking H2O back into hydrogen to refill its fuel tanks when the AC is on. Now this would be cool.

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    1. Re:Recharging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, too bad. Damn those laws of thermodynamics! Damn them all to hell!

    2. Re:Recharging by Karma+50 · · Score: 1

      The laws of thermodynamics haven't got much to do with (except in the sense that they have everything to do with everything).

      AaronW wasn't asking for a way to refuel itself for free ... he wanted a way for the fuelcell to refuel itself when the regular AC supply was present.

      --
      http://www.thehungersite.com
  49. Pricing structure by gnu-user · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a little more intelligent discussion of pricing (yeah I know, this is slashdot...)

    This product occupies a strange space, somewhere between a temporary generator and a high-end UPS. I checked the Coleman site for pricing on real generators, and (as consistent with my experience elsewhere) the pricing was "call us".

    Any ideas on the real pricing of generator systems?

    I'm not worried about personel cost to maintain (though I'm sure that's a real cost) but just the generator itself and the related infrastructure (venting etc.) as well as the related regulatory information.

    A lot of people ask me about setting up backup power; I've talked to enough folks to get a good idea of what's at stake, but I'd love to hear more.From what little I can see, this fuel cell might actually be a viable option for many of those folks.

  50. Site is now protected by attobyte · · Score: 1

    Looks like they didn't want all that known yet. :)

    Anyone mirror the site.

    Mike

    --
    I didn't use the preview button, so get over it!!!!

    Mike

  51. Correct URL by SnapperHead · · Score: 3, Informative

    The URL posted above isn't correct. Try, http://www.colemanpowermate.com/fuelcell/

    BTW, this site doesn't support Netscape. They don't know how to close off tables. Why is it that more then 40% of the websites I have gone to recently do that ?

    --
    until (succeed) try { again(); }
    1. Re:Correct URL by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      It is called lazy developers I know of one in my department that programs like this. I hate trying to maintain their code afterwards.

      I call them Microsoft Kiddies -- Those that think Internet Explorer is the only browser out there.

    2. Re:Correct URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From that page:

      "Coming Soon!

      Thank you for your interest in Coleman Powermate's new fuel cell products.

      Sign up now for our Instant News Service.

      You will be notified the day the world's first portable fuel cell generator becomes commercially available."

    3. Re:Correct URL by Nate+Eldredge · · Score: 1

      Said URL now requires a username and password. I guess they must be really hurting from the slashdot effect, and don't care so much about anyone being able to find out about their product...

    4. Re:Correct URL by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could also ask why Netscape doesn't support the HTML standard, which doesn't require you to close off certain table parts. (I think the only thing you're required to have a closing tag for is )

    5. Re:Correct URL by SnapperHead · · Score: 1

      Which is the tag that isn't closed off properly ...

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
  52. GE's offering is vapor by jmichaelg · · Score: 2

    GE is not selling the home unit - they're just talking about it.

    The GE unit is made by Plug Power and has been on GE's web site for close to a year now. Evidently, they've hit some snags. The fact Plug Power recently laid off almost 1/4 of their work force and their press releases talk more about financial than technology milestones doesn't bode well.

  53. It's a Ballard fuel cell by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    This is a Ballard Power Systems fuel cell, sold by Coleman. Ballard has been selling fuel cells for a while, and they reportedly work, but they seem to have trouble getting the price down.

    Ballard builds big systems. Their shipped product is a 250KW unit the size of a standard truck/ship container. They've been talking about a 1KW unit for a while, but their site still doesn't have photos of it.

    Ballard was supposed to be the hot company in fuel cells, but they've been at Real Soon Now for a few years, and it's not clear what's wrong.

    1. Re:It's a Ballard fuel cell by warlocke · · Score: 1

      The problem Ballard (and almost everyone else) is having is the catalyst.

      Fuel cells require platinum as a catalyst to keep the reaction temperature down to where the materials can survive. I've been following the tech desultorily for quite a while; several people have tried palladium or rhenium, with generally bad results, and anyway rhenium is harder to get than platinum, and all the palladium is going into catalytic reactors for cars.

      The problem is that platinum is hard to work with; a very high melting point, low vapor pressure, and not very "sticky". So all the wonderful vacuum-deposition tricks that are useful with aluminum and other metals fall down.

      Which leaves foil and pressure, which is what they mostly use. The trouble with that is that it uses a _lot_ of platinum -- the foil has to be thick enough to handle, which is way overkill for the amount needed for the fuel cell. The number I heard was that a 1000KW fuel cell -- about right for a high-powered car, or a medium-small truck -- would need $30,000 worth of platinum. Ouch.

      So put your thinking caps on. If you can work out a reliable, relatively cheap way to do vacuum deposition of platinum that can be process controlled to give an even coat at the one-molecule-thick level, load the gear on your truck and take it to Vancouver. The folks at Ballard will be glad to see you.

      Regards,
      Ric

  54. Because fuel processors cost $$$ and space. by EDA+Wizard · · Score: 1

    A fuel processor is needed to strip the hydrogen from propane or natural gas. These fuel processors are expensive and take additional floor space.

    Propane and natural gas are much more functional solution for a data center fuel cells, where they can be located in a fixed place and make use of city natural gas lines or large propane storage tanks.

    This particular fuel cell seems to target a different market. The under desk, or portable power generation market probably can't have the space or weight required to include a fuel processor and additional BBQ stryle propane tank.

  55. Yeah we had that demo too... by sterno · · Score: 1

    Our science teacher showed us how explosive Hydrogen was while we watched the instant replay footage of the Challenger blowing up. Something like, "and kids, that had billions times more hydrogen than what you just saw."

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Yeah we had that demo too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sicko science teacher!

  56. Site Firewall by ^MB^ · · Score: 1
    Couldn't even see the website, firewall too sceureCouldn't even see the website, the firewall is too sceure..

    SecureIIS application firewall security alert

    HTTP Request caused a security alert, please contact our web master if you are getting this alert in error.

    What is SecureIIS SecureIIS offers websites running Microsoft Internet Information Server a broad range of protection from common vulnerabilities, both known and unknown. Because SecureIIS does not protect against specific vulnerabilities, but classes of vulnerabilities, it allows for a much more far reaching layer of security.

    eEye? Digital Security - Vulnerability Is Over...

    1. Re:Site Firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't see the site either...

      I got the same message.

      SecureIIS application firewall security alert

      HTTP Request caused a security alert, please contact our web master if you are getting this alert in error.

      What is SecureIIS
      SecureIIS offers websites running Microsoft Internet Information Server a broad range of protection from common vulnerabilities, both known and unknown. Because SecureIIS does not protect against specific vulnerabilities, but classes of vulnerabilities, it allows for a much more far reaching layer of security.

      For more information on SecureIIS, please visit http://www.eeye.com/SecureIIS/

      eEye? Digital Security - Vulnerability Is Over...

  57. I don't think so. by Bwah · · Score: 2

    I could be wrong, but the last time I researched fuel cells, I got the impression that a properly designed cell could ingest propane, methane, etc. directly. No extra stuff required. It would produce some more nasty byproducts than a straight up hydrogen/oxygen cell. However, I think there was a bonus that you usually didn't have to humidify the input gas when you used something like methane.

    (IIRC humidification was one of those things that became pretty important when you started getting out of the pure research grade fuel cell sizes and into something that could be useful. I.e. something that runs hot.)

    Been a while since I looked at that stuff. Could be way wrong.

    --
    "There's no secret. You just press the accelerator to the floor and keep turning left." -- Bill Vukovich
    1. Re:I don't think so. by muleboy · · Score: 1
      I could be wrong, but the last time I researched fuel cells, I got the impression that a properly designed cell could ingest propane, methane, etc. directly.

      You're probably thinking of the high-temperature ceramic fuel cells. These can basically combine the functions of a "reformer" (which extracts hydrogen from hydrocarbons) with the functions of the fuel cell, because of the high temperature.

      I think Ballard makes polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells, which operate at around 80 Celcius (the membrane is basically teflon). These fuel cells can only run on hydrogen, or methanol at greatly reduced power density and greatly increased catalyst loading.

  58. It's not green bait... It's more like safety... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Try running an internal combustion generator in an enclosed space with you in it. They'll most likely be planting you in the ground when they find you later. Try doing that with this and you'll be around to tell the tale because it does specifically have no emissions other than water.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  59. Info from ballard (makers of the fuel cell) by morcheeba · · Score: 2

    Here's the spec sheet from Ballard of the Nexa module used in the coleman. Some interesting differences:

    1200 W, not 1000W.
    Lifetime: 1500 Hours (~2 months)
    Control interface: RS485
    Output: 46 Amps @ 26 volts
    Unit must be protected from weather, sand, dust, marine, and freezing conditions in product packaging (I assume coleman does this to some extent)

  60. They already have household cells... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    That run off of LP or Natural Gas. They're a little largish, but produce something like 10kW of electricity and enough waste heat to act as a pre-heater for your hot water system. They've been selling them for people over on the West coast for past couple of years. Now the GE system's unique in that it's designed to run off of Methane and thereby allowing you to use biomass sources to power the unit instead of LPG/NG- which would be a pretty "green" system indeed.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:They already have household cells... by Ioldanach · · Score: 1

      Now the GE system's unique in that it's designed to run off of Methane and thereby allowing you to use biomass sources to power the unit instead of LPG/NG- which would be a pretty "green" system indeed.


      Methane *is* natural gas. What you get out of biomass decomposition is very dirty methane. Unfortunately, unless you build a reformer for your reformer (i.e., something to clean it up into methane before it hits the fuel cell's reformer) you have too much gunk in the gas and will destroy your fuel cell with dirty natural gas.

  61. Did the slip by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

    Looks as though the site was not meant to go live so soon. I think we caught a slip up on the coleman site.

  62. The generator is only part of the solution by Mike+Greaves · · Score: 1

    > Have you actually tried that? I think you'd be in for a rude shock. Power quality will almost
    > certainly cost you a lot more then the 10K that the fuel cell would set you back.

    You can (and people actually do) use the crappy AC output from these generators to power sensitive equipment. You simply need the right power-conditioning equipment between the generator and your delicate load.

    Since utility AC is not so great either, a good set-up will need such equipment *anyway*, so you really do get the output of the generator for the cost of the generator alone - the power conditioning cost is already sunk.

    Your friend failed because he used a UPS which was not designed for this kind of power conditioning role. The right kind of UPS will work fine with a crappy Honda generator.

    You can buy integrated backup systems, from companies like APC, which include a generator. There is nothing magical about the kind of generator they use - it *too* produces crappy AC. But that AC is then rectified to DC, which is then stabilized by a lead-acid battery, which is then inverted to clean AC - or some similar scheme.

    If you know what you are doing, you can build equivalent systems yourself, using standard, cheap generators from the hardware store...

    --
    -- Mike Greaves
  63. That will go only 24 hours... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    This will go as long as you've got fuel and will work under conditions (like sub-zero temperatures) that would mess up the ordinary UPS.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  64. Actually, no... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    You get this if you're coming in from thier site as well...

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Actually, no... by Telek · · Score: 2

      ah christ guys, it was a JOKE, leave me alone already.

      And to the trolls who have been following me around marking my posts as flaimbait, don't you have anything better to do?

      --

      If God gave us curiosity
  65. Hydrogen didnt cause the Hindenburg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to burn up.
    It was the waterproofing compound,

    which was what we today call rocket fuel, albeit

    rather unrefined.

  66. Slashdot Effect=DoS attack! Stopped by SecureIIS! by Hobart · · Score: 3, Informative
    Seen when attempting to follow the link in the story:
    SecureIIS application firewall security alert
    HTTP Request caused a security alert, please contact our web master if you are getting this alert in error.
    What is SecureIIS
    SecureIIS offers websites running Microsoft Internet Information Server a broad range of protection from common vulnerabilities, both known and unknown. Because SecureIIS does not protect against specific vulnerabilities, but classes of vulnerabilities, it allows for a much more far reaching layer of security.
    For more information on SecureIIS, please visit http://www.eeye.com/SecureIIS/
    eEye Digital Security - Vulnerability Is Over...

    Wow... good to know that eEye is protecting innocent IIS users from the horrors of the Slashdot Effect!! ;-)

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  67. "Call us" pricing by yerricde · · Score: 2

    I checked the Coleman site for pricing on real generators, and (as consistent with my experience elsewhere) the pricing was "call us".

    "Call us" generally means "If you have to ask, you can't afford it; it's not priced for residential use." It lets sellers put people on the line who are experienced in dealing with the effects of sticker shock. Once, I was looking into a library to develop installable filesystems for Windows NT/2K/XP to see if I could port ext2fs, but Microsoft's poorly documented headers cost $1,000, and the only other available package cost $100,000. Ouch.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  68. They must think that slashdot is DDOSing them. by J.C.B. · · Score: 1

    This is the first time that I can recall the slashdot effect triggering a security response.

    1. Re:They must think that slashdot is DDOSing them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I even typed the url into the address bar and went there without having been referred by slashdot and it still gives the error.

  69. Need more nukes first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way fuel cells will work on a large scale is if we have many more nuke plants to generate hydrogen when as well as electricity (ie. at night, when demand is low, crank out more H). More nukes means more electric cars, more hydrogen for fuel cells, less polution.. Generating H with solar may sound like a good (PC) idea, but but the output would be laughable and what happens at night or when it rains?

    1. Re:Need more nukes first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting idea that the output from solar would be laughable... Is solar itself laughable? Energy is energy is energy is measured in Joules, and it doesn't matter if it comes from nukes or solar or whatever.

      The point is, whatever power solar generates is the same whether represented as electricity or hydrogen. The output would be no more laughable. (Or perhapse no _less_ laughable?)

    2. Re:Need more nukes first by ParamonKreel · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the efficiency is laughable. We just need to coat a few useless continents in solar cells and it will output as much as a few nukeular plantz. I suggest Australia.

    3. Re:Need more nukes first by Stone+Rhino · · Score: 0

      actually, I read in a magazine somewhere that if an area the size of rhode island was covered with solar cells, it would power the united states. and remember: these cells don't all have to be in one place. they can be on the rooftops of buildings...etc

      --


      Remember, there were no nuclear weapons before women were allowed to vote.
    4. Re:Need more nukes first by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Australia? Chicken feed. Coat the moon!

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  70. Re:I need this to charge the batteries on my Ginge by SkepTech · · Score: 0

    Coast to Coast?

    Do you live on Hawaii, or Puerto Rico?

  71. Re: Explosion & environmental risks of Lead Ac by silentbozo · · Score: 2, Informative

    The risk can be minimized by using valve-regulated absorbant-mat or gelled-cell batteries. They're still lead-acid, but they contain the electrolyte in either a mat or gel matrix which eliminates the spill hazard of sulfuric acid. The valve regulated feature allows the gases produced during charging to recombine instead of escaping if properly charged, via a valve-relief system.

    Keep in mind, any unit with a battery in it (including the Airgen), will vent hydrogen if overcharged - that's why you spend the money to get a good charger/regulator. A car alternator or el-cheapo car-battery charger are NOT good chargers (no intelligence), and either depend on a known load, or a timed charge. You want something that monitors amperage, temprature, and voltage, and knows the profile of the batteries you're trying to charge. Good chargers are not cheap, but well worth the cost in maintaining battery life, without having to resort to "boiling" your batteries from time to time to get full charge.

    Also, you might either want ventilation, or an outside installation for the units, if you really fear hydrogen that much...

    Regarding the environmental hazard, lead is the most recycled material (90-99%?), and batteries are not dumped, but chopped up and recycled into new lead-acid batteries. Any place that sells lead-acid batteries here in the US is required to accept them for recycling. Compare this to all the NiCad batteries (Cadmium is quite toxic) produced for consumer devices that people end up tossing directly into the garbage.

    The only other, low-cost high-capacity mass-market batteries, other than lead-acid, would NiFe, and good luck finding a supplier for those in small amounts.

  72. Lisa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know... Let's just take some AA batteries, and hook them up to some electrodes in water. That'll disassociate the hydrogen and oxygen. Then we can give those to the fuel generator, and presto! Instant energy! (After all, AA batteries are MUCH LESS EXPENSIVE than those canisters are.) Why stop there? We can just hook up the output of the fuel cell to the electrodes and remove the battery! ("Lisa, in this house we obey the laws of thermodynamics!")

    So, seriously, using methane to drive a fuel cell isn't easy. You have to have some way to strip off the hydrogen, and also have to keep the system very clean. Turns out water does this nicely(!), but the the cell is somewhat soluble in water, so you eventually destroy the cell. Catch-22. Then there's warm up time, etc.

    I imagine in this system, you can probably purchase a massive hydrogen cylinder from your local chemistry supply company, and refill the little baby cylinders from it. Then you refill the big one... then the company comes and refills the big one from the giant one... then refills the giant one by using electricity from the power company to disassociate water... who generates the power by burning coal! Until the methane problem gets worked out (or some other chemical supply), fuel cells will be an (expensive and inefficient) convenience for end users who just need an energy source that lasts longer than a LI battery.

    -me

  73. Fuel Cells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is no doubt based around the Ballard Fuelcells. Since a few months ago they did release their NEXA power module. For more information www.ballard.com

  74. Re:It's not green bait... It's more like safety... by LennyNero · · Score: 1

    Yes, but it DOES remove oxygen from the air. If I am not mistaken, we do STILL need that infernal substance to breathe....

  75. Re:I try to access it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AAAAA! Goddamn you!

    Geoshitties pulled your page and replaced it with their 404 page. On this page is a movie ad with a fat guy with his pants down.

    Goatse.cx-ers should be proud.

  76. Re:Slashdot Effect=DoS attack! Stopped by SecureII by brianc · · Score: 1

    Heh - I reported the SecureIIS error to webmaster@
    and received this interesting little reply:

    From: "Hoch, Jon"
    To: Brian Coyle ,
    webmaster@colemanpowermate.com
    Subject: RE: SecureIIS error - fuel cell animation
    Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 10:52:25 -0600

    Thank you for your interest in Coleman
    Powermate's new fuel cell generator.
    You are getting error messages because the
    pages that you are trying to view
    are restricted and currently offlimits. The
    fuel cell pages have been
    removed from the server.

    Please keep in mind that this is copyrighted
    material. Any retransmission
    of the material without the written consent of Coleman Powermate is strictly
    prohibited.

    Please contact me if you have any questions.

    Jon Hoch

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Brian Coyle [mailto:brianc@magicnet.net]
    Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 10:01 AM
    To: webmaster@colemanpowermate.com
    Subject: SecureIIS error - fuel cell animation

    Heh- /. effect taking it's toll? :)

    Clicking on 'fuel cell aninimation' in the
    lefthand nav bar results in:

    http://www.colemanpowermate.com/fuelcell/fuelcella nimation.shtml

    SecureIIS application firewall security alert

    HTTP Request caused a security alert, please contact our web master if you are getting this alert in error.

    Attempts to hit the pages now request a UID & password...

    --


    SIGLOST && SIGUNUSED && SIGQUIT
  77. Proton Exchange Menbrane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PEM's run on H2 + O2. Um. Ballard Power (the OEM of the fuel cell) only makes PEMs. PEMs have no undesirable waste products.... when run on H2. When run (with a reformer) off of CH4 (methane) it releases CO2 -> bad. Unless you are a plant somewhere global warming hasn't hit yet. Like mars.

  78. My other UPS runs on fusion by Belvario · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've been living in a solar house for over a year now, on a system I designed myself. Total system cost - just over $17,000 for the whole house, including labor. A few notes from someone on the alternative energy front lines...
    • You don't measure power use in watts, silly people - you measure it in watt-*hours*. It's all about watt-hours. How much you generate, how much you use, how much you store - all watt-hours.
    • So how much power do I get for $17,000? Not a whole lot... about 5 KwH a day (a 6th of what we used to suck down from the grid - read your power bill sometime, it's eye-opening). My array peaks at about 1000 watts x ~6 avg. insolation (sun) hours a day = 5KwH (since the output curve dips in the morning and afternoon. But with compact fluorescent lights everywhere and major appliances all overhauled, we get by comfortably. Battery backup is sized for 3 days with *zero* sun. The inverter (Trace 4024SW) can pump out 4kW if needed (10kW in short spikes) which more than covers anything we'd run all at once, including the well pump. I also have a 8KwH gasoline genset for backup, but I have used it only once so far. As time goes on I will probably add more array to the system - it doesn't always catch back up as fast as I would like after a cloudy spell. Luckily there is lots of ready expansion capacity in the system.
    • My power is cleaner than your power. I'm not talking about the pollution, I'm talking about the waveform :) Trace inverters make machine-room, raised-floor-quality power, for my whole house. I telecommute full-time, and run all my systems off it (desktops with efficient LCD displays and 2 laptops), and they are all very happy.
    • I got all my gear, including God's own batteries (Concorde Sun Xtender AGMs) from Solar on Sale - friendly service and outstanding prices.
    • My arrays are ground-mounted, not roof-mounted (makes it easier to brush off snow). Total yard footprint - about 50 sq. ft.
    • Really interested in this? Read Home Power Magazine, the ultimate geek journal on power hacking. The entire current issue is always available online for free download in .pdf format (way cool).

    My neighbors sometimes tell me that the grid is down, but otherwise I'd never know.
    1. Re:My other UPS runs on fusion by blkros · · Score: 1

      I say mod this guy up. Thanks, that was very informative.

      --
      Damnit, Jim, I'm an anarchist, not a F@#$!^& doctor!
  79. More Green than most anything else. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Only idiots think the best way to make Hydrogen is by electrolysis of water. There _are_ ways to make hydrogen without producing CO2. There are no ways to produce Octane efficiently - period. It isn't a panacea, but it's a huge freaking step already.

    Yes, it may take a little more energy on some of these paths, but sacrificing a little efficiency is WORTH it if you are also causing a net reduction in CO2 emissions.

  80. Re:I try to access it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, New feature in IIS 'protection from malitious Distributed Denial of Service attacks' Also know as the 'slashdot effect.' IIS because you don't want people to access your site... If you did you'd run apache.

  81. SHTML by j_w_d · · Score: 1

    I don't think it is due to a Firewall. The link on /. points to an *.shtml page. If you try going in through the Coleman site there is a request for a username and password. Apparently someone protected the page - or hacked it.

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  82. See, perhaps you didn't read it... by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 2

    They don't actually post a price for the fuel on the site yet. They INCLUDE it with the unit. Hence the question, WTF is the price for the unit ITSELF?

    --

    "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
  83. Methane is NOT supplied with your NG line... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Technically, yes. But it's not the whole constituents of the gas- it's got propane, butane, ethane, etc. in it. The bulk is methane, but there's more to it than that.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas