If I came across the domain in a search I could just as easily think it was for Frank Purdue the "chicken man". That is why I think the comment to which this one is a reply is baseless.
Re:22 million transistors?
on
Athlon Reviews
·
· Score: 1
The transistor count is a result of the integration of a large amount of cache onto the chip itself, not "wasteful" engineering. We're adding memory to the cpu itself here.
Regarding the geneologies there was not generally insistence on getting every generation listed. The idea was to claim a particular lineage or ancestor. Missing generations explain the misalignment pretty well. Any decent commentary suggests possible resolutions to any supposed inconsistency. But I doubt you read the commentaries. Mary was also a descendant of David but this was a very male-centered society so the authors "picked" Joseph as a concession to their culture. The Bible is plainly the best supported document from antiquity in terms of the number and age of manuscripts. It is also the most misused by "believers" and skeptics alike. That so many people died violent deaths for their belief in Jesus is remarkable. A considerable number who died were claimed eye witnesses to the risen Christ as well.
Strange to place this book alongside Genesis. I presume you're not challenging the factuality of the content though logically that is what one might gather from your comment. If Genesis were factual in the same way as the O'Reilly book it would hardly be irrelevant.
Slashdot Mirror
If I came across the domain in a search I could just as easily think it was for Frank Purdue the "chicken man". That is why I think the comment to which this one is a reply is baseless.
Would cgi-wrap have "contained" the problem?
The transistor count is a result of the integration of a large amount of cache onto the chip itself, not "wasteful" engineering. We're adding memory to the cpu itself here.
Perhaps we should follow our own advice? I think you wanted to write "grammar" (NOT grammer)?
Regarding the geneologies there was not generally insistence on getting every generation listed. The idea was to claim a particular lineage or ancestor. Missing generations explain the misalignment pretty well. Any decent commentary suggests possible resolutions to any supposed inconsistency. But I doubt you read the commentaries. Mary was also a descendant of David but this was a very male-centered society so the authors "picked" Joseph as a concession to their culture. The Bible is plainly the best supported document from antiquity in terms of the number and age of manuscripts. It is also the most misused by "believers" and skeptics alike. That so many people died violent deaths for their belief in Jesus is remarkable. A considerable number who died were claimed eye witnesses to the risen Christ as well.
Strange to place this book alongside Genesis. I presume you're not challenging the factuality of the content though logically that is what one might gather from your comment. If Genesis were factual in the same way as the O'Reilly book it would hardly be irrelevant.