chrome cast is a joke because you need a laptop to use it. my friends are always talking about "casting" stuff to the tv. with ATV, you just watch it on the tv! not to hard bro.
the one thing apple doesn't do, and the only thing that matters, is to integrate all channels and sources into a singe interface. you can search for breaking bad and netlix pops up, you can search for KUWTK and E! shows up, you can search for GoT and HBO shows up. this is the only thing that will truly "solve" tv.
the joke is on people who think Apple missed out by not producing their own tv, as opposed to a set top box. looool. tvs have razor thin margins and people will hold on to a set for 10 years. sounds like a shitty business to be in.
The only way to avoid technical surveillance is to keep everything sensitive away from email or phone calls or instant messages.
I don't have any sensitive stuff I'm afraid they'll see. It just annoys me that I can't have a private conversation in the privacy of my own home. Even if I'm not a target for "tailored operations", my data is still vacuumed up through PRISM/XKEYSCORE/whatever other program. And that really sucks.
am I really SOL?????
I'll also add, since I'm reposting anyway, that it sucks that LA County installed license plate readers everywhere and now they log all my car trips. cmon people, srsly? next thing they're going to get rid of cash.
The only way to avoid technical surveillance is to keep everything sensitive away from email or phone calls or instant messages.
I don't have any sensitive stuff I'm afraid they'll see. It just annoys me that I can't have a private conversation in the privacy of my own home. Even if I'm not a target for "tailored operations", my data is still vacuumed up through PRISM/XKEYSCORE/whatever other program. And that really sucks.
It's depressing. As a privacy-aware and generally technologically literate but not super savvy about encryption protocols, etc, I don't know what to do. I want to have some measure of privacy, but I don't want to step out of the mainstream phone ecosystem. These days is it mandatory for me to put my tinfoil hat on to get a bit of space to myself?
the constitution defines "citizen" as somebody born in the US. So if you're a fetus you're not a citizen because you haven't been born yet. so the constitutional rights don't apply to you.
the bible is kinda long and some of it is more applicable than other parts. you know those parts that are basically family trees but in word form? Jebediah, the first of his name, begat bazzilo, who begat frentes...
Other parts are called psalms and its not clear what they mean.
I have never seen an iAd. The only reason it exists is so apple can set a precedent for banner ads that protect privacy. they probably lose money on the initiative.
Your comment is not related to the summary or the article. The summary says "It was a different approach toward the same goal of multiplying the number of firearms in the world," but this is a misinterpretation. The goal isn't to make cheap guns. you think buying a home CNC machines and manufacturing a gun bespoke piece by piece is going to multiply the number of firearms? There are factories in China belching out thousands of assault rifles every day.
The ghost gunner is about taking away from congress the means to protect yourself. there are people in congress and elsewhere that think nobody should have guns and any firearm should pass through govt hands. this is wrong. the ghost gunner is a proof of concept, and it's scaring a lot of people.
Same thing if he makes it nonoperational and walks around subway stations talking into a nonoperational phone in a bid to entice would be thieves to nab it.
the justice system moves slow, but when it gets moving in a direction it can sweep over a topic like a tsunami (eg a strong tide). think of gay marriage. There was no single block buster case. Instead, it was a progression, where in some states it was legalized, in other states it was illegalized. Everywhere it went to district courts, and some won and some lost. These filtered up to state supreme courts, again with a variety of rulings and justifications. Then, federal district courts ruled different ways. Finally, the supreme court has taken on a couple cases, that in aggregate, should settle the issue once and for all.
Prepare for a similar process here. There are some encouraging signs. SCOTUS has taken on two really big privacy vs. technology suits in the past couple years, and in both cases ruled unanimously (9-0) for privacy. police GPS trackers without warrants in 2010 I believe, and police searching cell phones without warrants in 2013 I believe. Also, a number of district courts are taking on the no fly system, and one in particular is doing a really great job of pushing through the states secrets claims that the fed is trying to make. (link omitted, cuz I'm at work and can't spend a couple mins searching google right now).
So in short, there's hope, but it will take some time. But when it happens, it will be a total victory.
I was going to post this. Wikimidia can't sue because the NSAIDs spied on the world. They need to show that NSAIDs harmed them before a suit can proceed. This standing issue is in the constitution.
Slashdot Mirror
QED! well played bro.
I watch tv with no computer needed. Also I don't wag h every day. You should get a hobby #LAME
chrome cast is a joke because you need a laptop to use it. my friends are always talking about "casting" stuff to the tv. with ATV, you just watch it on the tv! not to hard bro.
the one thing apple doesn't do, and the only thing that matters, is to integrate all channels and sources into a singe interface. you can search for breaking bad and netlix pops up, you can search for KUWTK and E! shows up, you can search for GoT and HBO shows up. this is the only thing that will truly "solve" tv.
the joke is on people who think Apple missed out by not producing their own tv, as opposed to a set top box. looool. tvs have razor thin margins and people will hold on to a set for 10 years. sounds like a shitty business to be in.
What does everybody call that pointer thing. I call it a nub. My wife calls it a clit.
I was going to say that Riverrun is the Vietnam of westeros.
the problem is that if there is no circumcisn then the dong looks just plain weird. you want your kid growing up with a weird looking dong?
or every time you wank...
doh. quote tag fail.
The only way to avoid technical surveillance is to keep everything sensitive away from email or phone calls or instant messages.
I don't have any sensitive stuff I'm afraid they'll see. It just annoys me that I can't have a private conversation in the privacy of my own home. Even if I'm not a target for "tailored operations", my data is still vacuumed up through PRISM/XKEYSCORE/whatever other program. And that really sucks.
am I really SOL?????
I'll also add, since I'm reposting anyway, that it sucks that LA County installed license plate readers everywhere and now they log all my car trips. cmon people, srsly? next thing they're going to get rid of cash.
The only way to avoid technical surveillance is to keep everything sensitive away from email or phone calls or instant messages.
I don't have any sensitive stuff I'm afraid they'll see. It just annoys me that I can't have a private conversation in the privacy of my own home. Even if I'm not a target for "tailored operations", my data is still vacuumed up through PRISM/XKEYSCORE/whatever other program. And that really sucks.
am I really SOL?????
It's depressing. As a privacy-aware and generally technologically literate but not super savvy about encryption protocols, etc, I don't know what to do. I want to have some measure of privacy, but I don't want to step out of the mainstream phone ecosystem. These days is it mandatory for me to put my tinfoil hat on to get a bit of space to myself?
The cake is a lie
you could take a selfie of it.
the constitution defines "citizen" as somebody born in the US. So if you're a fetus you're not a citizen because you haven't been born yet. so the constitutional rights don't apply to you.
the bible is kinda long and some of it is more applicable than other parts. you know those parts that are basically family trees but in word form? Jebediah, the first of his name, begat bazzilo, who begat frentes...
Other parts are called psalms and its not clear what they mean.
I have never seen an iAd. The only reason it exists is so apple can set a precedent for banner ads that protect privacy. they probably lose money on the initiative.
citation to an article that discusses specifically about how apple violates privacy? or does it not exist?
will they want the whole gun, lock, stock and barrel?
Your comment is not related to the summary or the article. The summary says "It was a different approach toward the same goal of multiplying the number of firearms in the world," but this is a misinterpretation. The goal isn't to make cheap guns. you think buying a home CNC machines and manufacturing a gun bespoke piece by piece is going to multiply the number of firearms? There are factories in China belching out thousands of assault rifles every day.
The ghost gunner is about taking away from congress the means to protect yourself. there are people in congress and elsewhere that think nobody should have guns and any firearm should pass through govt hands. this is wrong. the ghost gunner is a proof of concept, and it's scaring a lot of people.
Why do you think it's ispy? No camera, health data is stored locally, many privacy pledges by apple which is more than google does.
Same thing if he makes it nonoperational and walks around subway stations talking into a nonoperational phone in a bid to entice would be thieves to nab it.
true but his chances of getting the phone stolen are the same whether he locks it or not.
the justice system moves slow, but when it gets moving in a direction it can sweep over a topic like a tsunami (eg a strong tide). think of gay marriage. There was no single block buster case. Instead, it was a progression, where in some states it was legalized, in other states it was illegalized. Everywhere it went to district courts, and some won and some lost. These filtered up to state supreme courts, again with a variety of rulings and justifications. Then, federal district courts ruled different ways. Finally, the supreme court has taken on a couple cases, that in aggregate, should settle the issue once and for all.
Prepare for a similar process here. There are some encouraging signs. SCOTUS has taken on two really big privacy vs. technology suits in the past couple years, and in both cases ruled unanimously (9-0) for privacy. police GPS trackers without warrants in 2010 I believe, and police searching cell phones without warrants in 2013 I believe. Also, a number of district courts are taking on the no fly system, and one in particular is doing a really great job of pushing through the states secrets claims that the fed is trying to make. (link omitted, cuz I'm at work and can't spend a couple mins searching google right now).
So in short, there's hope, but it will take some time. But when it happens, it will be a total victory.
The good news here is that the aclu and eff are participating. These orgs are very savvy and wouldn't waste time on a suit with no chance.
I was going to post this. Wikimidia can't sue because the NSAIDs spied on the world. They need to show that NSAIDs harmed them before a suit can proceed. This standing issue is in the constitution.