People have expectations of privacy. How many videos does he have of people NOT having sex in a vehicle?
A victim's lawyer is going to file for discovery and get every piece of fucking technology under this asshole's control and lock him up for every minor he's peeked at.
Look at the population sizes and probabilities of the demographics.
As JustAnotherOldGuy points out, there are a few cyber coin exchanges and a shit load of headcount that would like to grab some play dough.
Given the small number of players inside the exchange perimeters as compared to the billions who are on the outside, trying to get in, and given that ALL players have the same goddam hardware and software and mental capabilities, the odds are that many people outside the exchange inner circle are very much more savvy than the people guarding the gates of the exchanges.
Hunnert dollas to a hole in a donut says the exchange took advantage of recent "GOVERNMENTS DEMAND BACKDOORS" to cash out and blame it on the backdoor buzzword of the day.
Early adopters of Internet shit are batshit crazy.
... the hackers have reported an exploit to the owner and the owner just doesn't give a shit and the grey hat officially declares a grace period before going public.
Then, I could see the grey hat grabbing a SMALL amount of data, as a proof of concept, to share with the owner with the warning that if something isn't done during another grace period, the shit's going to hit the fan.
The grey hat had better have the sense god gives a piss ant to be anonymous, of course.
... this shit is a goddam story is the camera attachment.
People want to video stuff from unusual perspectives.
I'll bet you a dollar to a hole in a doughnut that most people don't have a drone, don't want a drone, and don't know bullshit from wild honey about drones to the point that those who do have one mostly crash them. Look it up on YouTube®.
The common sense rules work to void the expectations of irresponsible people who want to fly fucking video-equipped toy airplanes over cars, people, houses, and power lines.
For the few who insist on getting one, they need to pony up and get one that carries a database of no-fly, downloaded from the Internet and described in terms a simple GPS can understand.
Scenario:
A wildfire breaks out. FAA temporarily invokes no-fly for drones in a particular area. My drone won't cross the perimeter and returns an error that translates into: "Sorry, but I'm not allowed to go there."
Slashdot Mirror
This.
This motherfucker wants one thing: Attention.
He'll get it by way of violence or litigation.
People have expectations of privacy. How many videos does he have of people NOT having sex in a vehicle?
A victim's lawyer is going to file for discovery and get every piece of fucking technology under this asshole's control and lock him up for every minor he's peeked at.
It's true.
AND ...
You have the skills, desire, and time to nurture a new hobby of playing whack-a-mole.
The vast majority of people don't know what in Sam Hill you're talking about.
What about hem?
The icon arrangement on a Windows desktop is natively sorted alphanumerically.
Other configurations are random to the core.
Look at the exploit stats. Many take advantage of unpatched systems.
That plug in the back that looks like a wide telephone cord? Unplug that and stuff.
There are bad nasties looking for machines that have not been updated with security patches.
Because icon placement is real important and stuff.
I see what you did there.
Trump has small hands.
would do.
Actually, they do stop existing.
There are a shit load of people who don't exist.
I don't have a Snapchat account. I don't have a fucking clue about what goes on over there. Those people don't exist in my world.
1/4 hookers, 1/4 johns.
... to fix security -- litigation.
Instead of shrugging our shoulders with the fail of, "Well, that's just the Internet," we need to identify the incompetent and make them pay.
Businesses are not motivated to give a shit unless there's financial gain or cost avoidance.
That's the ONLY reason businesses have fire extinguishers, sprinklers, smoke alarms and fire exits.
This, precisely.
We are all here statisticians.
Look at the population sizes and probabilities of the demographics.
As JustAnotherOldGuy points out, there are a few cyber coin exchanges and a shit load of headcount that would like to grab some play dough.
Given the small number of players inside the exchange perimeters as compared to the billions who are on the outside, trying to get in, and given that ALL players have the same goddam hardware and software and mental capabilities, the odds are that many people outside the exchange inner circle are very much more savvy than the people guarding the gates of the exchanges.
Hunnert dollas to a hole in a donut says the exchange took advantage of recent "GOVERNMENTS DEMAND BACKDOORS" to cash out and blame it on the backdoor buzzword of the day.
Early adopters of Internet shit are batshit crazy.
Fiat currency A --> bitcoins --> wallet --> backdoor --> El Chapo
No one loses jack shit until they sell. Those who are automatically buying are going to make out like bandits.
Maybe if the fanbois were to come up with something original ...
I did this because you pissed me off.
I sincerely regret any inconvenience you may have caused me and stuff.
... the hackers have reported an exploit to the owner and the owner just doesn't give a shit and the grey hat officially declares a grace period before going public.
Then, I could see the grey hat grabbing a SMALL amount of data, as a proof of concept, to share with the owner with the warning that if something isn't done during another grace period, the shit's going to hit the fan.
The grey hat had better have the sense god gives a piss ant to be anonymous, of course.
... this shit is a goddam story is the camera attachment.
People want to video stuff from unusual perspectives.
I'll bet you a dollar to a hole in a doughnut that most people don't have a drone, don't want a drone, and don't know bullshit from wild honey about drones to the point that those who do have one mostly crash them. Look it up on YouTube®.
The common sense rules work to void the expectations of irresponsible people who want to fly fucking video-equipped toy airplanes over cars, people, houses, and power lines.
Just stop it.
The word, "drone," is a media-applied description.
The FAA does not use the word drone. It uses, "Unmanned Aircraft System."
You are correct in that it's simply any small airplane, regardless of configuration (fixed-wing, helicopter, quad-copter, whatever).
Here's a FAQ.
No. People don't need fucking toy airplanes.
For the few who insist on getting one, they need to pony up and get one that carries a database of no-fly, downloaded from the Internet and described in terms a simple GPS can understand.
Scenario:
A wildfire breaks out. FAA temporarily invokes no-fly for drones in a particular area. My drone won't cross the perimeter and returns an error that translates into: "Sorry, but I'm not allowed to go there."
The no-fly applies to permanent areas, as well.
Certainly, we have a positive correlation between the absence of drones and the Holocaust.
... the question is: Who did NOT vote.
This could help answer that.