... SRT has been in development for several years and its success rate improved greatly after Google bought out the shirt recognition technology site, "Shirt Happens," back in 2011.
You are trying to use history to describe an event that hasn't happened yet and it won't work. We have never been let loose to engage North Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan ISIS, in full-scale warfare.
You are trying to use history to describe an event that hasn't happened yet and it won't work. We have never been let loose to engage North Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan ISIS, in full-scale warfare.
I'm not suggesting the we should, but we haven't.
If we were given the green light to to go full-scale, we could easily do scorched Earth.
The idea is that groups of citizens can protect themselves feom soldiers regularly entering homes to enforce the dictatorial president's will. Small arms have been proven to be very effective for that.
While considering slavery a moral travesty, hideous evil, and clearly at odds with his values of the American Revolution and republican virtue, Jefferson owned several hundred slaves at his home at Monticello and surrounding agricultural farms and businesses. In much of his correspondence to friends and business associates, Jefferson laments the immoral institution of slavery and yet describes how it must continue.
I do know shit about history. In my extensive readings, I realized that the definition of, "Founding Fathers," as suggested by the plural form, was not comprised solely of Thomas Jefferson.
Slashdot Mirror
... SRT has been in development for several years and its success rate improved greatly after Google bought out the shirt recognition technology site, "Shirt Happens," back in 2011.
We both have access to the same facts so there's not much to debate.
You know dang well Libya is not a democracy and that it is owned by the military.
My call is to ignore your call as pure fiction with an agenda.
So now this thread has wandered off in the direction where you assert that the military doesn't control, say, Libya? (and others)
According to TFS.
... he took so much, he is having trouble spending it all before he dies.
So we can't use, by way of example, cases (hint North Africa) where the military turns on its own people?
... insurance rates, as well.
After your citation, right?
Anyway, here's the link you asked for:
You are trying to use history to describe an event that hasn't happened yet and it won't work. We have never been let loose to engage North Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan ISIS, in full-scale warfare.
Everything is hackable.
Absolutely not true.
That statement is a condom that IT wears and guess what?
It's got a rip in it.
When IT's incompetence becomes the subject of litigation, let's revisit this with nostalgia.
I did. Read above.
Well, just SHIT!
TB
(thanks bro)
... oh, wait.
Wouldn't do you any fucking good. The government has bigger guns than you can buy in Texas.
... because that bat-shit crazy Rick Perry ain't got sense god gave a piss ant.
... brings to the table is providing fucking reports that we've been hacked.
As for actually being able to STOP that shit ... forget it.
Wrong on all counts.
You are trying to use history to describe an event that hasn't happened yet and it won't work. We have never been let loose to engage North Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan ISIS, in full-scale warfare.
I'm not suggesting the we should, but we haven't.
If we were given the green light to to go full-scale, we could easily do scorched Earth.
The idea is that groups of citizens can protect themselves feom soldiers regularly entering homes to enforce the dictatorial president's will. Small arms have been proven to be very effective for that.
Citation, please.
... you do make some BOLD uppercase statements.
... I want /. to take down any posts where I have been called an asshole.
tyvm
... Republicans have been wanting to kill off science education, women's reproductive rights, immigration reform, same-sex marriage ...
No, wait.
Sorry.
Republicans are going to tackle the Top Threat to America.
DuckDuckGo
Let me Google that.
Yahoo has a search engine, and so does Bing and some others.
People use Google.
I think there's something to it as well.
That sounds a lot like this:
While considering slavery a moral travesty, hideous evil, and clearly at odds with his values of the American Revolution and republican virtue, Jefferson owned several hundred slaves at his home at Monticello and surrounding agricultural farms and businesses. In much of his correspondence to friends and business associates, Jefferson laments the immoral institution of slavery and yet describes how it must continue.
Contradictory much?
I don't talk about it much. I mostly author. Not lost upon me is your reluctance to cite.
I do know shit about history. In my extensive readings, I realized that the definition of, "Founding Fathers," as suggested by the plural form, was not comprised solely of Thomas Jefferson.
However, read and weep:
While considering slavery a moral travesty, hideous evil, and clearly at odds with his values of the American Revolution and republican virtue, Jefferson owned several hundred slaves at his home at Monticello and surrounding agricultural farms and businesses. In much of his correspondence to friends and business associates, Jefferson laments the immoral institution of slavery and yet describes how it must continue.
Bold is mine.