Slashdot Mirror


User: Orgg

Orgg's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7

  1. Re:I'd buy it... on Mac OS X Leopard Edition: The Missing Manual · · Score: 1

    They took away interference robustness in leopard. I miss it. Bring it back!

  2. Best blog on the subject, bar none. on Investing Tips for College Students? · · Score: 1
  3. Re:So now it's ok to like VB? on Free IDE Gambas Reaches 1.0 · · Score: 1

    There is one simple solution to all problems of your VB app: On error resume next; YEEHA!

    Try structured exception handling (at least in VB.Net)
  4. Re:Look at those Screen Shots! on eComStation 1.1 Entry Edition Review · · Score: 5, Informative
    Can you even *pay* Mirocosoft to sell you a copy of Win 3.11 ? You can't - they *force* you stay on the upgrade treadmill


    Yes, you can. I can download Windows 3.11 and even Windows 3.12 (Asian language thing, I think) with my MSDN subscription. I still have clients with Windows 3.1 in use where it just isn't feasable to upgrade. Getting support for it on the other hand...
  5. Re:How about a meta-database adapter? on Database Clusters for the Masses · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your problem wouldn't be solved with the product mentioned in the story. However, because you are using MS SQL Server, this is really easy. You just need to get the postgres ODBC Driver, and setup a Linked Server on the MS box.

    Check out This page for the postgresql ODBC Driver.

    You should also look at the linked servers documentation in SQL Server Books Online (under sp_addlinkedserver) as well as the interface in enterprise manager (security -> linked servers)

    As I was searching a bit, I see that people have had trouble using the server.database.owner.object syntax, however using the SQL Server OpenQuery(servername, query) function seems to work, and will allow you to control the exact SQL Statement sent to postgres.

  6. Re:Bullshit on Apple to Announce new Mac OS X version in June · · Score: 1

    Going from Mac OS X 10.n to 10.n + 1 should cost nothing for someone who already owns 10.n. It is an incremental upgrade.


    x.y to x.y+1 isn't always an incremental upgrade ;)

    Windows 2000 = Windows NT 5.0
    Windows XP = Windows NT 5.1

  7. Re:pointless if its only the Word Pro on HP Drops Microsoft Word in Favor of WordPerfect · · Score: 1

    Haha, does perl work well with and easily display multidimensional data in OLAP Cubes? How about those secretaries that need to modify that report you just finished in perl?