Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X Leopard Edition: The Missing Manual

jsuda writes "The preeminent general reference source for Mac OS X has always been the Missing Manual Series written by David Pogue. The latest iteration in the series is its Mac OS X Leopard Edition, completely revised, and it is the biggest, most comprehensive, and most useful of all the editions in the series. It covers the Mac OS X desktop and file system, the free applications included with the Mac OS X installation, the system components and technologies, networking and online features and components, and includes welcome appendices on installation, troubleshooting, Windows/Mac comparisons, and a Master Keystroke list." Read on for the rest of John's review. Mac OS X Leopard Edition: The Missing Manual author David Pogue pages 893 publisher O'Reilly Media Inc. rating 10 reviewer John Suda ISBN 9780596529529 summary Great Manual for all levels of users Every one of the editions has been exceedingly well-designed and written combining serious treatment of subject content with style, wit, and humor, as well as honest evaluation and critique of features of the Mac operating system. All of the OS X Missing Manuals have addressed issues for a broad range of users, from the lightly experienced, the intermediate, and for power users. For the most part, however, the primary focus of each edition has been on the less experienced users. This has changed with the Leopard edition.

There seems to have been a deliberate effort to make the book more appealing and useful to upper-end users without losing any utility at all for others. There seems to be more material for power users- -there are more Power Users Guides providing advanced information and techniques, more UNIX references for those willing and able to take avail of the UNIX kernel underlying the operating system, more identifications of keyboard shortcuts, and more disclosure of undocumented and advanced features than in previous editions.

For example, Pogue itemizes and describes at least 20 UNIX utilities that only power users would want to use, explains how to configure preferences for the Terminal application, explains how to deal with the file and folder permissions system using UNIX commands, and even notes the existence of the venerable Eliza therapist emulator program hidden in a part of the emacs text editor. At each juncture of describing operating system features, Pogue explains from the perspective of different levels of users, including the power user, like himself. Unlike in many other books purporting to cover a broad range of users, this one does not short on the higher-end.

This is all well and good as casual users are still widely well-taken care of by the thorough and well-organized explanations of nearly every feature of OS 10.5. The book is illustrated profusely with screenshots of system features, configuration processes, comparison of the Mac OS X versions, comparisons of Mac OS X to Windows features, and more. Nearly every page is loaded with Tips, Notes, FAQs, lists, tables, and sidebars. Throughout, there are nuggets of insight and technical arcana that even Mac veterans will be surprised to learn about. I learned, for example, that the one-button Apple Mighty Mouse has a secret 2-button feature. Also there is a similar way to operate a laptop with a two finger trackpad technique. There are a lot of tips and tricks like that in the book. Even beyond description and explanation, Pogue provides useful recommendations for configurations of the Dock, recovery from common errors, and using Automator to design practical workflows for common tasks.

The subject content builds upon that of previous editions and updates it with material relating to the 300-plus new features of Leopard. Much of the new material covers the Leopard update highlights the backup program called Time Machine, a desktop switching application called Spaces, the Stacks organizing feature, the file previewer, QuickLook, and the feature enhancements in iChat, Mail, and especially Spotlight, the search tool.

Spotlight is much more than a mere search tool although it is a great one. A whole chapter is devoted to it alone. Pogue explains how to use it not just for casual and advanced searching (using over 125 types of data and metadata) but as a quick launcher of files, folders, and applications; as a calculator; and as a dictionary. Sophisticated query languages can be used and Pogue lists a series of power user keyboard shortcuts for Spotlight use.

I see the book as especially useful for those Windows users of all levels gravitating to the Mac platform. Not only is the treatment of the Mac OS done well, but at nearly every juncture, Pogue takes the perspective of a Windows user and provides practical comparisons and contrasts of operating systems.

Weaving all of these perspectives into a harmonious, readable manual is a fine achievement. The content discussions and explanations are never abstract but written from the viewpoint of the thoughtful and practical user and no one is better at this than David Pogue who has been cited before as one of the worlds best (technical) communicators. The denseness of the treatment of the subject content diminishes somewhat from the readability of the book compared to prior editions and there is a bit less wit, humor and style. That is the trade-off, I presume, for the increased breadth and depth of the content treatment but this Missing Manual is still as well written as a computer manual can be expected to be.

You can purchase Mac OSX Leopard Edition: The Missing Manual from amazon.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

130 comments

  1. I'd buy it... by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 1

    If it would tell me how to fix all these Airport disconnects that Leopard seems to cause.

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    1. Re:I'd buy it... by ZerocarboN · · Score: 5, Informative

      You might want to try the Interference Robustness option to see if it helps.

      http://www.macinstruct.com/node/213

    2. Re:I'd buy it... by WinkyN · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might want to check out this link from The Unofficial Apple Weblog (http://www.tuaw.com/2008/02/25/potential-fix-for-an-annoying-macbook-air-wireless-issue/) to see if it addresses your issue. The link says it's for MacBook Airs but some users have reported success with other models.

    3. Re:I'd buy it... by rsmoody · · Score: 1

      That was SO pissing me off last night. Just out of the blue, the wireless disconnects on me, then does it again in like 2 minutes, and gain. ugh! I turned the airport card off and back on, seemed to fix it, but really, what the hell!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:I'd buy it... by macslas'hole · · Score: 1

      What's really fun is when the wireless freaks out and takes the trackpad with it. I've had mine stop working or even reverse left to right and up to down.

      --
      Life's a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
    5. Re:I'd buy it... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Informative

      If by Airport you mean a wireless connection to an actual Apple Airport router, then skip this reply. If, on the other hand, the wireless router is not an Apple router, check to see if the router has some kind of "turbo" or "speed boost" or similar mode. Those modes do some things that are outside the standard but often work (especially with wireless cards made by the same manufacturer as the router!), but sometimes don't. If the router has such modes, try turning them off.

    6. Re:I'd buy it... by Orgg · · Score: 1

      They took away interference robustness in leopard. I miss it. Bring it back!

  2. iPhone edition by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

    So can I read it on my iPhone? :P

    1. Re:iPhone edition by monomania · · Score: 3, Informative

      In fact, this book is available on the O'Reilly Safari Books Online (no relation to the web browser) service, and I do read them on my iPhone. Low-end subscriptions are relatively cheep, and well worth it; I keep 10 books on my bookshelf at any one time for about $20 a month. I just added this one to my bookshelf.

    2. Re:iPhone edition by monomania · · Score: 2

      And I post from my iPhone too, as you can tell ;)

  3. Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by CRCulver · · Score: 0

    OK, so Apple doesn't include a manual with their software, necessitating that one buy a third-party help, and then O'Reilly issues a new one with every update of OSX. Does OSX really change that much from version to version? Wouldn't the old Mac OS X Tiger: The Missing Manual continue to serve most users?

    1. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by Toe,+The · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can ignore the "10." in Mac OS X version numbers. The transition from Tiger to Leopard is from version 4 to version 5. Yes, that's a big change.

      Just because Microsoft can't come out with OS updates but once or twice a decade doesn't mean that Apple isn't providing significant updates to their OS more regularly. People see a reason to spend $130 for Leopard; there must be something new there.

    2. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Wouldn't the old Mac OS X Tiger: The Missing Manual [amazon.com] continue to serve most users?"

      Not necessarily. Because Leopard is a major upgrade, the Tiger edition might be OK for the basics, but there's always going to be that 10% that will mess people up because it doesn't work that way anymore. For example, the networking, sharing, and printing UI was completely revamped. Also, many of the Spotlight capabilities mentioned in the article summary are new to Leopard. They wouldn't be covered at all in the Tiger edition.

      Since OS X has a far smaller user base than Windows, Apple feels less constrained when making major changes to basic things, if they feel there is a long-term payoff. Therefore the pace of change can feel faster than Windows.

    3. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Users would of course find that many things from the Tiger "missing manual" would still apply. Obviously, though, anything that changed between Tiger and Leopard would be different. Why wouldn't O'Reilly want to stay up to date?

      This really isn't a tough logic problem.

    4. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Informative

      Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast?

      No, but it does become obsolete that fast. Features new to Leopard that were not in Tiger include:

      • The ability to create Widgets by selecting portions of Web pages
      • Stacks - folder icons that dynamically change to indicate what is in the folder
      • A system-wide grammar checker and the system-wide spelling checker/dictionary/theasaurus expanded to include wikipediaand more dictionaries (include non-English languages)
      • A new type of viewing in the window/file manager that lets you pan through giant preview "icons" of files
      • Updates and new features for most of the consumer applications (mail, calendar, IM, Web browser, Media players, and PDF viewer/image viewer)
      • Remote desktop access and sharing integrated into the IM client
      • New supported file systems and improved remote filesystem server/client
      • Parental controls that include application specific restrictions (no Web browsing after 11pm for little Jimmy)
      • Virtual desktops
      • Expanded, indexed system-wide searching
      • Automated backup/versioning from the GUI
      • Completely redone UI for the handicapped (braille boards, audio interface, etc.)
      • Dtrace ported from Solaris for developers, and a bunch of other dev tools and new APIs
      • Application layer firewall
      • Built in mandatory access controls/sandboxes and app signing for security
      • A guest account that resets itself to a clean default state each login

      Does OSX really change that much from version to version?

      Yes. 10.n to 10.n+1 is major upgrade akin to going from XP to Vista. As one of those people who doesn't read the manual before diving into something, I'm still finding new features and I've had it for months. Just yesterday I noticed in an e-mail a friend sent me about a concert he was going to downtown "next friday at 9:00", that right clicking on the time, gave me the option of automatically creating an event in the calendar program for that day at that time labelled with the concert name. That's exactly the kind of stuff a book about Leopard is nice for finding out about.

    5. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      So O'Reilly shouldn't update their book? What's your point here?

      If you want to buy it, do so. If not, don't.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      In OS 9 (or was it 8?) they called that Apple Data Detectors. It worked in every app, and was teh awesomes -- but works way better now. In Mail.

      I'm glad they are starting to bring it back. I'm hoping that they make the APIs available to other applications in the next release.

      Next tech I'd wish they'd bring back? OpenDoc!

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    7. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by macslas'hole · · Score: 1

      Amen to that brother. OpenDoc rocked.

      --
      Life's a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
    8. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by anagama · · Score: 1

      Yeah -- Leopard needs a manual if consider how boogered up X11 was until the 10.5.2 release, and how amazingly useless Spaces is -- seriously, I had no idea that it was possible to misapply up the multiple desktop metaphor, but Leaopard has "screwed the pooch" on this front, giving us some strange mutant iteration of multiple desktops. It's litterally impossible to do X forwarding from a single terminal and then spread forwarded windows out over two or more "spaces". I'm reverting to Tiger till the 3d party virtual desktop programmers decide they bailed too early on their projects and bring them back from the dead (no -- they dont work in Leopard as is).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    9. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by anagama · · Score: 2, Informative

      Re: Virtual Desktops

      Trust me, if you expect "Spaces" to be like the virtual desktops you're used to in Gnome or KDE -- it isn't. It's practically useless in fact being based on the notion of application partitioning rather than task partitioning. This means if you try to spread out windows from one program over several desktops, you're in for some confusing behavior. And if you used forwarded X sessions over X11 via ssh -- get ready for really crazy behavior unless you keep all your windows on one desktop, and DO NOT open any other terminal windows from your login terminal window -- you'll find you can't even click on previously opened windows if you do that. Of course, it sort of defeats the whole purpose of multiple desktops if you have to keep every application related to X11 open on the one desktop.

      I like OS X (Tiger and below), but I'm totally burned with Leopard. The 3d party desktop managers don't even work anymore. I'm ticked and I plan to be noisy about. How many years have I waited for an integrated solution for multiple desktops? And this is what I get? Utter crap that reduces functionality.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    10. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by adamruck · · Score: 1

      "Dtrace ported from Solaris for developers, and a bunch of other dev tools and new APIs"

      You mean the broken Dtrace?

      http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/22/2156244&from=rss

      --
      Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
    11. Re:Does OSX documentation go out of print so fast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Features new to Leopard that were not in Tiger include: Most of the "features" you listed are updates/tweaks/improvements to existing features, not new features.

      Does OSX really change that much from version to version? Yes. 10.n to 10.n+1 is major upgrade akin to going from XP to Vista. That's about as inaccurate as saying a Windows Service Pack is akin to going from Tiger to Leopard. Can we just stop this bullshit from Apple and Microsoft fanboys?

      Yes, going from Tiger to Leopard is a much bigger leap than going from XP with Service Pack 2 or 3 to Vista. However, a more appropriate comparison (for Windows) is going from XP RTM (before free Service Packs) to Vista, and that upgrade has many more new features than going from Tiger to Leopard. XP simply had 2 free Service Packs (3rd coming soon), each one smaller than an OS X 10.x update, but much bigger than a 10.4.x update.

  4. Blimey... by Angostura · · Score: 0, Troll

    Three replies and no-one has posted 'I thought OS X was "just supposed to work"' yet.

    1. Re:Blimey... by Shados · · Score: 1

      Crap. I was going to post that but you beat me to it >.

    2. Re:Blimey... by The+Ancients · · Score: 1

      Steve's Reality Distortion Field is in for servicing. Apparently in a very small number of cases it caused dancing like a monkey.

    3. Re:Blimey... by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      I actually bought the book; I haven't read it yet. I was a hardcore MacOS user at work (1987, System 6 on a Mac II, through 1993, System 7.something, Mac IIfx) and at home (Mac SE, PowerMac 6100AV, iMac DV 400 MHz). I kept current through MacOS 9. I never took the leap to Mac OS X. I thought I'd lose too much hardware, the software upgrades would cost too much, the machine kept on working.

      I finally broke down and picked up a second-hand machine (Mac Mini G4 1.42 MHz) with MacOS X Leopard installed. It's all too different; I need more help understanding the features. I don't have the time to learn everything by playing. Oh, and I need to dual boot to Mac OS X 10.3 to get classic, so I can power down the Mac OS 9 machine.

    4. Re:Blimey... by KURAAKU+Deibiddo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You may want to look into this, then: Classic on Intel.

      Set that up, and you won't need your 10.3 install anymore.

  5. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by The+Ancients · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would you expect a comprehensive book written by a 3rd party to be supplied free with the OS?

    If you want help from Apple, there's the built in help function, the section of their website, and their Discussions Forums

    , not to mention the free call number available in almost all countries they officially sell in.
  6. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by Toe,+The · · Score: 4, Informative

    They provide an entire website of documentation about Leopard.
    http://www.apple.com/support/leopard/
    (and yes, they assume you can get to and read a web page).

    I see ENORMOUS books on how to use Windows... or even Word for that matter. 600+ pages describing how to use a word processor.

    Why doesn't Microsoft give those third-party books away for free?

    You do realize this is a third-party book, right?

  7. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

    Just like all the Windows books that cover material that Microsoft didn't put in a book with the operating system? How about all those programming books, the compiler makers should cover every topic you should ever need to know about programming too.

  8. Bad ISBN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A valid ISBN has either 10 or 13 digits. The listed "780596529529" has 12. Perhaps it is a UPC?

    1. Re:Bad ISBN by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      They just missed a number. From O'Reilly's site: ISBN 10: 0-596-52952-X | ISBN 13:9780596529529.

    2. Re:Bad ISBN by fracai · · Score: 1, Funny

      7, 8, 0, 5, 9, 6, 5, 2, 9, 5, 2, 9 That's amazing! I've got the same combination on my luggage!

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  9. what about wireless? by linuxpng · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Will it tell me how to fix wireless on leopard that 10.5.2 didn't fix?

    1. Re:what about wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hopefully not

    2. Re:what about wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fixed this problem on my alu iMac by disabling the blue tooth device. I've only had the network drop twice since, which is pretty amazing compared to how bad it was before.

      Of course, I don't have the wireless keyboard or mouse.

    3. Re:what about wireless? by linuxpng · · Score: 1

      is it really a solution to disable something and still have it drop twice... even at all?

  10. OK, I'll Bite by Hellad · · Score: 3, Informative

    the book doesn't tell you how to make it work when it doesn't. It is a comprehensive guide to all of the features that may be missed by users who aren't paying attention. I gave the tiger edition to my mother in law. While she could use the machine out of the box, she wouldn't figure out the more complex aspects of the finder on her own. In addition, the book contains a basic guide to the ilife programs as well as iChat. While she could likely figure this out on her own, having a resource has been great for her. It gives basic users a more advanced knowledge than they would otherwise have.

    1. Re:OK, I'll Bite by cawpin · · Score: 1

      Well, that sucks. I just need to know when they put in the option to have folder at the beginning of the list in finder. That's the one thing that drives me nuts about OS X. I have my files organized into multiple, many-levels-deep folders. Why they haven't included this feature, at least as an option, is beyond me. One large sand box of files doesn't work well a lot of the time.

    2. Re:OK, I'll Bite by mveloso · · Score: 1

      Well, you could put it into list view and sort by kind. That moves folders to the top of the list.

      Or, you could just start adding random characters to your folder name so they show up at the top of a list.

      Or use that dock stacks thing.

    3. Re:OK, I'll Bite by cawpin · · Score: 1

      That's the exact same "answer" everybody else has and it does nothing to actually fix the problem. I want to sort by name, so I can find things, and I want folders at the top so I can dig through them quickly. I don't understand why they don't have it; it is a minimal amount of effort to incorporate.

    4. Re:OK, I'll Bite by ArAgost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, this is the kind of things in OS X designed to be coherent. If you order by class, things get ordered by class. If you sort by name, things get sorted (guess what!) by name. You can't have "sorte by name but also not", sorry.

    5. Re:OK, I'll Bite by KURAAKU+Deibiddo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could always check out Path Finder, and use that instead of Finder. It offers this feature. I've been using it in place of Apple's Finder since 10.1 or 10.2. It offers a lot of things Finder doesn't. The only minus, if you're attached to Cover Flow, it does not have this feature yet (which is the only feature I'm aware of that Finder has and Path Finder does not). QuickLook works.

      Although, you can use QuickLook from Terminal, also. Just add this to your ~/.bash_profile for added laziness:

      function ql
      {
      (qlmanage -p "$@" > /dev/null 2>&1 &
      local ql_pid=$!
      read -sn 1
      kill ${ql_pid}) > /dev/null 2>&1
      }

      Then use 'ql whatever' in Terminal. You can also find a ton of third-party QuickLook plugins here and here.

    6. Re:OK, I'll Bite by cawpin · · Score: 1

      I actually tried Pathfinder this week as I knew of it before I bought the MBP. I'm not sure if I want to pay $35 for basic OS functionality. If I find other reasons I may break down and get it. I just wish this was built in. It is in EVERY other OS I've used including every flavor of Linux and Unix I've tried.

  11. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

    Seriously.

    Also - it's been a long time since I bought a copy of Windows XP, but I seem to recall that the "manual" it came with was basically a "Getting Started" guide, maybe 50 pages long or so, with big, easily-readable text on small pages. I don't really see that as much of an improvement over what Apple supplies.

  12. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by Altus · · Score: 3, Informative


    if it was called "Secrets of OS X" instead of "The Missing Manual" nobody would bitch. People are more than happy to take any opportunity they can to take a shot at apple. My girlfriend recently bought a vista laptop. It didn't come with a vista manual (or even install/recovery disks)... but there is no "Vista: The missing manual (and recovery disk)"

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  13. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by Altus · · Score: 2, Informative


    OK... I stand corrected

    There most certainly is a missing manual for vista.

    --

    "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  14. Who the fuck makes a stupid comment like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Actually, the great majority of Mac OS X is based on open source, including the entire core: http://www.opensource.apple.com/

    The web engine is Apache. The internal database is SQLite (I think). The kernel is BSD. The web engine is KHTML. And so on.

    Yes, the packaged product is proprietary and also contains closed source. But I would hardly compare it with Microsoft, where everything is not only closed but deliberately incompatible.

    Heck, I wouldn't even compare them to Red Hat, which costs a three times as much and is getting crappier by the day.

    1. Re:Who the fuck makes a stupid comment like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the great majority of Mac OS X is based on open source, including the entire core: http://www.opensource.apple.com/

      The web engine is Apache. The internal database is SQLite (I think). The kernel is BSD. The web engine is KHTML. And so on. Which only goes to show how adept Apple is at stealing other people's work and R&D, then selling it on for a massive profit.

      Yes, the packaged product is proprietary and also contains closed source. But I would hardly compare it with Microsoft, where everything is not only closed but deliberately incompatible. Neither would I. At least Microsoft make an effort to be compatible with operating systems they previously made. As of 10.5, Apple can't even be bothered to do that.
    2. Re:Who the fuck makes a stupid comment like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, App£e is more proprietary than Micro$oft, agreed. They even lock-in people to their hardware. And M$ owns a big slice of App£e so their "competition" is a bit so-so. Both fuckers love their DRM. And treat customers like idiots. Unfortunately it's working out great for them. Money mania! $$$

      Way to go cheeseheads.

    3. Re:Who the fuck makes a stupid comment like that? by anagama · · Score: 1

      I'll bet RedHat hasn't totally borked the multiple desktop metaphor. Apple's Spaces does application partitioning -- not task partition. God forbid you actually try have two windows from the same application open on different desktops. And if you are using forwarded X sessions via SSH -- you might as well just give up doing any work ever ... till you revert to Tiger and your trusty 3d party multiple desktop program.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:Who the fuck makes a stupid comment like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which only goes to show how adept Apple is at stealing other people's work and R&D, then selling it on for a massive profit.

      Right. Because nobody should ever make any money from open source projects. (Would you mind telling that to MySQL and IBM and Novell and Digium and pretty much every single person on /. too?) The point behind open source is that nobody should even use it, right? That's why it's open?

      Neither would I. At least Microsoft make an effort to be compatible with operating systems they previously made. As of 10.5, Apple can't even be bothered to do that.

      Well if you're that misinformed, you really should avoid posting. 10.5 runs on plenty of old Macs, back to those made in 2002 How many people are buying $130 operating systems for sx year old computers? There are plenty of newer PCs that won't run Vista. So what are you trying to say here.?

    5. Re:Who the fuck makes a stupid comment like that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he said "Microsoft make an effort to be compatible with operating systems they previously made."

      I think he means that you can run Vista on XP. Right?

      P.S. Yeah. All Apple does is steal code from others. This is all they're willing to give back:
      http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.5.2/

  15. Mouse Acceleration by oskard · · Score: 1

    Does it tell how to completely disable mouse acceleration? I don't mean *kind of* disable. I want the whole thing off. No acceleration. I want a static ratio for my mouse movements (like, N*x), not some parabolic guessing (like x^N). I don't want Windows' default mouse acceleration. I want to move my mouse 12 inches lightning fast, and 12 inches snail slow, and cover the same exact distance. I WANT IT COMPLETELY DISABLED.

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
    1. Re:Mouse Acceleration by jpellino · · Score: 1

      Why?

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    2. Re:Mouse Acceleration by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've had my mac for a month. I had Mac-style mouse acceleration for 2 days.

      Then, I installed Logitech's all-in-one OSX utility (the Logitech Control Center). It recognized my Logitech USB mouse and - voila - the awful acceleration was gone, swept aside by using the hardware vendor's driver instead of the one that ships with the OS.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    3. Re:Mouse Acceleration by Pope · · Score: 1

      Go buy USB Overdrive or another one of the 3rd party mouse controller apps.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    4. Re:Mouse Acceleration by gad_zuki! · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sir, my name is Stanford and I am contacting you from Apple special support. It seems like you have stopped drinking your kool-aid. If you like we can send you 10 free packets of sugar-free Jobs next day air. Continue to drink your medication, I mean, promotional drink. Continue the mantra of "Apple is never wrong, white plastic is the most beautiful thing in the universe" over and over.

    5. Re:Mouse Acceleration by Firehed · · Score: 2, Informative

      System Prefs - Mouse - Acceleration slider... move to 0.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    6. Re:Mouse Acceleration by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      That doesn't fully get rid of mouse acceleration. It just reduces it.

    7. Re:Mouse Acceleration by anagama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who cares why -- it is what he wants. That is enough.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    8. Re:Mouse Acceleration by boomgopher · · Score: 1
      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    9. Re:Mouse Acceleration by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Hey, which mouse of Logitech have you bought?
      Iam using an LG mouse with default driver and it sucks.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    10. Re:Mouse Acceleration by jpellino · · Score: 1

      I'm just not sure what zero accel would be useful for - trying to understand.

      But thanks for *your* contribution.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    11. Re:Mouse Acceleration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's like the OP said - when I move the mouse 12 inches, I want it to move the same distance, REGARDLESS OF HOW FAST I MOVE THE MOUSE.

      I thought it was kind of simple to understand. Mouse acceleration means if I move the mouse faster, it moves further than if I move it slower.

      I agree with the OP, give me the option to kill that feature, I don't want it.

    12. Re:Mouse Acceleration by jpellino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I understand what he said - and I know what mouse accel is and why it's useful - I'm trying to get at the usefulness for the desired zero accel.

      Is there an app that works better under it? Tablet use? Fine(st) grained control?

      If it's just personal preference, fine.

      --
      "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  16. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by Z00L00K · · Score: 2, Funny
    You will find it in /lost+found.

    But you will have to do a fsck first.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  17. Jump to End of Line by Danuvius · · Score: 1, Troll

    Does the master keystroke list tell you how to jump to the beginning or the end of the line without using the mouse?

    I have never seen that done on a Macintosh computer before. For those of us with a real computer, the 'home' and 'end' keys perform this bit of magic quite universally.

    --
    Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    1. Re:Jump to End of Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      apple + left arrow (home)
      apple + right arrow (end)

      get a mac before you complain about how its not a "real" computer.

    2. Re:Jump to End of Line by jrothwell97 · · Score: 2, Informative

      On older keyboards it's command+left / command+right. Alt+left/right goes between words.

      I think the newer keyboards do have end/home keys, as well as an fn key and better-labelled page up, down and command keys.

      --
      Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    3. Re:Jump to End of Line by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I can't tell you off the top of my head, since it's not something I consciously think about, but now I've typed something into this box I can see what buttons my fingers press when I think beginning / end of line...

      Apparently it's command-left/right. Skipping a single word is option-left/right. Unless you are in a Qt app, in which case it might be control, because Qt developers wouldn't know interface consistency if someone beat them to death with it (not sure if this has been fixed in recent versions of Qt - I tend to avoid Qt apps like the plague).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Jump to End of Line by Yaztromo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does the master keystroke list tell you how to jump to the beginning or the end of the line without using the mouse?

      Command-LeftArrow, Command-RightArrow has always worked fine for me.

      Yaz.

    5. Re:Jump to End of Line by foniksonik · · Score: 4, Informative

      Additionally you can use option+left/right arrow to jump to beginning/end of words and option+shift+left/right to highlight words... while apple/command + shift +arrows will highlight the rest of the sentence to the left or right of your current insertion point.

      I'd say that's enough *real* features whatever that means...

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    6. Re:Jump to End of Line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "For those of us with a real computer..."

      If you don't have a Unix or Unix-like based OS, you don't have a "real computer". What is your case?

    7. Re:Jump to End of Line by keytoe · · Score: 2, Informative
      • option - left/right arrow: Beginning/end of word
      • command - left/right arrow: Beginning/end of line
      • command - up/down arrow: Beginning/end of document
      • Add shift to any of the above to do selection modifications

      Additionally, most standard EMACS key bindings are supported. Is that 'real' enough for you?

    8. Re:Jump to End of Line by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Home and End usually go to the top or bottom of a document, though, not a line.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    9. Re:Jump to End of Line by Danuvius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Presumably your little comment was meant to prop-up OS X as a real OS based on its POSIX compliance.

      One need only watch a Mac user work for 5 minutes to recognize that its POSIX compliance means nothing. The OS seems to miraculously turn even previously reasonable savvy computer users into specific-application-using near-luddites. Happened to my best friend. Seriously.

      As for me, I use Linux.

      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    10. Re:Jump to End of Line by anagama · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, there are keys labeled "home" and "end" on my mac keyboard and I too have wondered why they don't do anything. Seriously, why paint the words on the key if it doesn't do squat?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    11. Re:Jump to End of Line by anagama · · Score: 1

      try it out fn-home does absolutely nothing. Yup, just tried and cursor did: absolutely nothing. This is true on my macbook and powerbook. It has always mystified me.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    12. Re:Jump to End of Line by martinX · · Score: 1

      Works in Word, but I suppose that stands to reason.

      Help key doesn't do anything either.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    13. Re:Jump to End of Line by Markus+Landgren · · Score: 1

      Try this. I've used it to "correct" a few oddities in the default behavior of my mac, although I probably wouldn't have bothered with it unless I had also needed it for typesetting in LaTeX.

    14. Re:Jump to End of Line by archivis · · Score: 1

      You can assign the Home/End keys to do whatever actions suit your fancy, if you delve into the keyboard preferences files. See for example, this link: http://www.n8gray.org/blog/2004/05/07/fixing-the-homeend-keys-on-os-x/

      Fixing that was pretty important to me in my mac migration. :)

      --
      In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
    15. Re:Jump to End of Line by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Due note though that some applications need "custom" fixes for that problem too. Firefox is the only one I'm aware of, but it's a big one. The really annoying part is that Firefox loses this setting EVERY time it updates. I managed to find a small little program to fix Firefox quickly, but it's still annoying to do. I eventually got over the "Red button on Windows doesn't exit the program." thing. I (mostly) have gotten over the "Green button doesn't really maximize most windows." thing. The broken Home/End keys though are just terrible. Not enough to drive me away, but still, annoying.

      I do really wish though that Mac handled WMV files a bit better though (I know, it's an MS format and so not likely). Quicktime plays them fine with Flip4mac, but it does a conversion step before hand that can be annoying when viewing files over a network. VLC opens them immediately but it's seeking behaves oddly, and it will give error messages while watching a WMV file. I just wonder: if Flip4mac does this conversion for "Mac use": why can't you just have it convert the file once, save it, and then not have to go through that step each time?

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  18. Quite, and that was my point by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 1

    but this is /. so the subtlety was missed :-)

    --
    If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
  19. ELIZA !== emulator by seandiggity · · Score: 1

    ELIZA doesn't "emulate" a therapist, whatever that would mean. It's a parody of a psychiatric interview.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  20. Wrong ISBN ! by malaba · · Score: 2, Informative

    on Amazon:

    ISBN-10: 059652952X
    ISBN-13: 978-0596529529

    1. Re:Wrong ISBN ! by johannesg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Stop supporting ISBN-13 numbers, damnit! It is like the IP6 of ISBN numbers:

      - We can still go years with the existing ISBN-10 system.
      - We can gain even more years if large publishers were to return unused parts of their ISBN-10 space.
      - The ISBN-13 system will require vast changes to existing libraries costing billions of dollars.
      - In fact, BAT ("Book Address Translation") is good enough for most users.
      - BAT provides an extra layer of security that ISBN-13 just doesn't have.
      - The extra digits are inefficient and take up needless space.
      - None of the problems with ISBN-10 are fixed by ISBN-13.
      - Noone can remember ISBN-13 numbers, they are just too long.

      Did I miss any?

      And while I'm here anyway, just who is misplacing all those manuals anyway and why is that newsworthy?

      What's next on slashdot? "Cowboy Neal: the Missing Carkeys"?

  21. ^E: simple emacs bindings are supported by igb · · Score: 2, Informative

    ^A and ^E. Handily, every text box that's a product of the standard libraries on a Mac supports (albeit not desperately, or at all, well documented) basic emacs binding. It's a NeXTStep legacy. So I'm typing this into a standard browser text box in Safari, and ^A, ^E, ^T, ^B, ^F, ^K, ^Y, ^O, ^P and ^N have their expected meanings. The meta/escape versions don't work, and there's no marks (^@ or ^-space), kill ring, and so on. But it's enough to be going on with, and makes typing slashdot posts far more civilised.

    1. Re:^E: simple emacs bindings are supported by Pope · · Score: 1

      Emacs binding is present for all Cocoa text fields (Safari, Camino, most Apple-supplied apps with the occasional exception). You have no idea how many times I sit here at work on an XP system and try to Control-T to twiddle my typos!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  22. Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    * occasional graphic system hangs (background processes work fine, keyboard and mouse stop working, firing up a new dialog box causes a process to hang)

    * Looooong wait times for wake-from-sleep (15 seconds typical) with no indication whether it's going to wake from sleep at all (e.g. if the battery is drained)

    * sometimes doesn't sleep when lid is closed (until the battery drops to emergency levels, see above)

    * sometimes doesn't recognize monitors when waking from sleep. Sometimes the monitor it doesn't recognize is the macbook's own.

    * Fucks up screen geometry when plugged into a 1600x1200 external monitor (menu bar moves to external monitor as needed, but stays at the native-screen width; X windows and most applications silently ignore clicks near the lower or right edges of the external monitor

    I'm sorry I ever upgraded to Leopard -- it's such a buggy piece of crap that I'm beginning to feel like I'm using a Microsoft product.

    1. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by avalys · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have the exact same issues with my 2.4 GHz MacBook Pro. I did an "archive and install" from 10.4, but I'm thinking of doing a clean reinstall and seeing what happens. A friend of mine with the exact same laptop upgraded to Leopard and is having no problems, so I'm guessing I have some kind of crap third-party drivers, kernel extensions, or something on my system that is screwing things up.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by toddabalsley · · Score: 1

      Same problem. I did a clean install of everything and restored my docs from backup, and the problem seems to be corrected.

      I went to Leopard a little early; but with 10.5.2, it is a lot better. There was a graphics update at the same time that probably did the actual fixing.

    3. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had minor issues too with an update. I did a fresh reinstalled and all problems were gone.

    4. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      * occasional graphic system hangs (background processes work fine, keyboard and mouse stop working, firing up a new dialog box causes a process to hang)

      I haven't seen that one, so I can't comment.

      * Looooong wait times for wake-from-sleep (15 seconds typical) with no indication whether it's going to wake from sleep at all (e.g. if the battery is drained)

      Heh, I wish my Windows machine was as fast waking as a broken OS X machine. :) I've seen this one occasionally when running old carbon applications that have not been recompiled since 10.1. I think it has to do with a conflict when there is a runaway LaunchCFMApp process and the system is suspended and you require a password to wake from sleep. Or maybe you're seeing a different issue. Anyway, that does not seem fixed in 10.5.2

      * sometimes doesn't sleep when lid is closed (until the battery drops to emergency levels, see above)

      I had this problem with an old work machine. Eventually figured out it was a hardware problem. Replacing the hardware using an archive install fixed this and it has never been a problem since.

      * sometimes doesn't recognize monitors when waking from sleep. Sometimes the monitor it doesn't recognize is the macbook's own.

      I saw this one regularly with 10.4. It has been gone since I upgraded to 10.5.0 (archive install).

      * Fucks up screen geometry when plugged into a 1600x1200 external monitor (menu bar moves to external monitor as needed, but stays at the native-screen width; X windows and most applications silently ignore clicks near the lower or right edges of the external monitor

      Hmm, never seen that one.

      I'm sorry I ever upgraded to Leopard -- it's such a buggy piece of crap that I'm beginning to feel like I'm using a Microsoft product.

      That sucks. I guess all I can do here is echo others and recommend trying a fresh install and see what happens. Personally, I haven't had any problem bothersome enough for me to consider doing so since 10.0, since the install from old mac option is just too bloody convenient.

    5. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 1

      Thanks, 99..., avalys, and todd... -- it appears I need to do a fresh install. I'll take a stab at that sometime in the next few days.

    6. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry I ever upgraded to Leopard -- it's such a buggy piece of crap that I'm beginning to feel like I'm using a Microsoft product. Tell me about it. For a second there I thought you were describing my ThinkPad. Looks like Apple is doing their best to become a mainstream OS, bugs and all.
      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    7. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't suppose you had something like SleepWatcher installed? http://www.bernhard-baehr.de/

      I had a similar problem when leopard came out and remembered I was using SleepWatcher - the OS itself now can do what I was using it for, so I uninstalled it and my problems went away.
      According the the site, leopard fixes were made, but I've not yet had reason to try them.

    8. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the other ones (and I did experience a few), but the long wake-from-sleep was a network-availability issue where the fix supposedly couldn't be backported to 10.4 from 10.5 (at least that's what the kernel developers were telling me). If you're still seeing it in 10.5, then try filing a bug with Apple (or if you know any developers at Apple, try getting one of them to post internally) - it'll probably be duped, but you never know.

    9. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm extremely annoyed at how enthusiastic Leopard is about waking up external drives. How to lock up the system for 10-15 seconds with a beachball hang while it spins up my external drives:

      * Open a tab in Safari. Close a tab in Safari.
      * Bring up a save/open dialog box (even without selecting the external drive).
      * Right-click on a file.
      * Open a new window in the Finder.

      If I perform each of those actions when my external drives have shut down - it'll spin them up for absolutely no damn reason (all the while presenting a frozen application).

      Another "favorite" bug is this: On waking from sleep, Leopard sometimes asks for my password - then goes straight back to sleep again.

    10. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by mikabreto · · Score: 1

      The things I hate about Leopard are what I've experienced: I was given Leopard as a Christmas gift, installed it with baited breath on Christmas Day Eve, lost my entire hard drive's contents (well, temporarily; I was able to recover 95% when I booted into FireWire Target Disk Mode [but even then only when attached to an older G4 running Tiger], and I've done six updates with no hitches at all so I know what I am doing, but apparently Apple didn't when they created the installer. Subsequently, aprés Leo, I now have occasional moments where the DVD drive will spit out yet another disk that it mysteriously couldn't burn data onto with any reliability. Not just with Toast, mind you (yes, I had the latest update, what did you think, tech support, that I ignore these things?) but with Automator AND Disk Utility...OTOH the 25 buck surplus no box drive that I got at Micro Center runs flawlessly with all the previously mentioned software. I like this one too: Apple decided to "break" the way it did font management as well. So developers have to scramble to release updates to address it. And what of the miraculous feature that disappeared from the release version of Leo, the desktop file sharing function? Did they banish it into iChat? Don't they think an iChatter may wish to share with his AIM brethren? And don't even get me started about iChat's file transfer function, which only works if each user is in the same CPU architecture, and same OS version. What does Steve-O think happens every six months? The same queue of people picking up this season's hardware? I think not. The concept of sharing is snared in the concept of parity. I am a print artist who needs to be able to send a 15 to 75MB PDF of a design back and forth to clients and printers, and I do not have $210 or more to spend a year on the upkeep of an FTP services packager. And don't comment about Yousendit.com and their ilk: I want to be able to send my file across my desktop to my client, transparently. So few of us can even navigate the file structure much less come to terms with another software to learn...

    11. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be glad to know that my MacBook Pro is totally fine & has had none of these problems.

    12. Re:Will it tell me how to fix these bugs? by Floody · · Score: 1

      It's "bated breath" (as in abated). Baited breath is just ... disgusting.

  23. Re: $21 is too much? by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    Yes, but according to TFSubmission, it's an "exceedingly well-designed and written" manual.

    It all depends on what Dickensian weasel words are worth to you.

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  24. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by schnablebg · · Score: 1

    Throughout, there are nuggets of insight and technical arcana that even Mac veterans will be surprised to learn about. I learned, for example, that the one-button Apple Mighty Mouse has a secret 2-button feature. Also there is a similar way to operate a laptop with a two finger trackpad technique.

    As a recent switcher to Mac, and Windows and *NIX Power User, I am interested in this book. But can someone else tell me if the various ways to simulate right-clicking is really the extent of the "insight and technical arcana" in the book??

    I knew about right clicking on the Mighty Mouse and the two-finger touchpad trick months before I even bought a Mac!

  25. Needs to be tagged "Apple"... by argent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wondering why this doesn't show up on apple.slashdot.org. Hmmm?

  26. Will it tell me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Will it tell me how to install OSX onto non-proprietary closed hardware?

    1. Re:Will it tell me by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      Why should it when you can just go a web site dedicated to that.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  27. "secret 2-button feature"???? by mattack2 · · Score: 2, Informative
    That has been prominent in the advertising all along. It has a scroll wheel and is/can be a two-button mouse.

    http://www.apple.com/mightymouse/

    Touch-sensitive technology under Mighty Mouse's seamless top shell detect where you're clicking, transforming your sleek, one-button mouse into a two-button wonder.


    Also, it's prominent in the picture at the top of the page.
  28. Re:Does it explain... by mveloso · · Score: 2, Informative



    Yuk yuk yuk. Your wit is painful to witness.

    Yeah, remove Application Enhancer before installing Leopard. That always does the trick.

  29. Slashdot needs better review guidelines by helge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The ratings given to reviewed books are useless as it is now. Most books are given an 8 or 9, and there doesn't seem to be any system for how to rate the books. For example, the last X books that I looked up under book reviews were given: 7/10, 9, 9/10, 6/10, 8, 8/10, 8/10, 9, 9, 9/10, 9, 8, 8/10, 7/10, 10. The reviewers don't even know if there should be a "/10" in the rating or not. I've also seen ratings on a 1 to 5 scale.

    It would be better, if different parts and aspects of the books were given separate ratings, and then a total rating was calculated from the parts. Please also look into how other publications rate books. I'm sure there's a lot to be learned.

  30. folder sorting by j-beda · · Score: 1

    There is no such feature. I can understand why it might be desired though. You can simulate it by naming all folders starting with a character that gets sorted to the top, such as a space " " or a dash "-". Similarly if you want them at the bottom, start their names with "zz" or something similar. But you probably already figured this out on your own....

  31. VideoTips and Guided Tour too by Lord+Satri · · Score: 2, Informative

    I found these one useful too: http://www.apple.com/business/videotips/
    you can subscribe to the videocast. While most video tips are things I knew about, some are truly useful and well hidden features (oops?). The best part is probably the short length of the videotips themselves: 1 minute per week is something I can afford.

    And let's not forget the Guided Tour. 30 minutes, but worthed: http://www.apple.com/macosx/guidedtour/

    And while I'm a it, there's a new section this year: http://www.apple.com/findouthow/

  32. Read on... by mdielmann · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...for the rest of John's review. Um, why bother? I read the first 2 sentences and figured he gave it a 10. And look, I'm right.

    Next!
    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  33. Re:Boo by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hey!

    I am doing my ph.d. on supercomputers. Linux in my field is not just a reality, its the rule. When its not linux, it is... well, solaris, sun os, and, well... mac os X.

    Unix is not open source. BSD is. Unix is a property of Novell.

    About the multimedia, well, windows is the king today. But the best pc you can run windows today is a mac. Be it a desktop or a notebook.

    About easy upgradable computer, are you using intel chips recently? About the media and the ipods, you are wrong, completely wrong. Apple today sets the standards on this field, even on scientific research.

    Oh, my country has no macs advertisement, but it is present in top research.

    Oh yes, openMPI and XGrid is built-in on macs, and they work together! Tell a university system's administrator that such a system exists and then just prepare yourself to buy them... As we are doing now.

  34. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by conorlime · · Score: 1

    How do you do an fsck? Check the manual in /lost+found of course!

  35. Re:Leopard manual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    No, OS X and Linux are used by people who don't need your attitude, retard. Go eat your boogers.

  36. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Girlfriend? GIRLFRIEND?? You must be lying because 1) nobody here has a GF, 2) they wouldn't be GF much longer if they bought a Vista machine and 3) you would be fscking her instead of posting here.

  37. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. Re:$21 for something you would expect to be suppli by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The book goes quite a bit beyond that. I'm a Mac developer, and even I'm finding it useful.

  39. Reason to buy it by Geo123 · · Score: 1

    Give me a good reason why someone needs to buy ut

    1. Re:Reason to buy it by Geo123 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you have money to throw.