The "Trans Day Of Remembrance" is fear mongering for political gain and power, same as any other big lie. Do the math.
Jorgensen was feted everywhere she went. There was none of the crap we saw after the whole push for LGB rights claimed us as part of them.
Doesn't matter that your country is so f*cked up wrt violence. The only violence on the radar here towards transsexuals is those who are foolish enough to live in the gay village, afraid because they are too afraid to leave the "protection" of the gay ghetto because, gee whiz, it must be even worse elsewhere - though it's not. The US is seriously screwed, as are many latin american, african, and asian countries.
Using common sense to avoid getting beaten or killed is not "blaming the victim." You can walk across the street because you have the right of way, but when you get killed you'll be "dead right." Saying "Mr Car Driver, don't run me over because I have every right to be because YOU are violated MY civil rights." If you don't sell sex or drugs or hang around with those who do you are far less likely to be targeted. The number one rule of survival is DON'T BE STUPID. Doing illegal crap pretty much guarantees that people can mess you up and you most likely won't go to the cops. If you can't figure that out, Darwin is waiting, same as anyone else of whatever background.
Also, transsexuals have no need for a spokesperson. We are better off without the political bullsh*t that the gay rights movement loves playing. We don't need any more splashback. That isn't speaking for the rest - it's just an observation that we're tired of being misused and misrepresented by what is now known as the white gay mafia.
21 people in ten months is nothing. A drop in the bucket. As I said before, the murder rate for transsexuals is far lower than the general population - and you can't include cross-dressers in that stat because it's an apples-oranges comparison. So quit trying to justify the LGB narrative towards transsexuals. It's total bullshit.
Unfortunately, you have to keep in mind that the US has used CSIS to snoop on communications that the US was forbidden from snooping on first-hand. Also, Canada is part of 5-eyes. I wouldn't trust our government in this matter any more than I would trust the US. Now Merkel and other european governments are pissed that the US was spying on their personal phones... and then there's relocating to Cuba...
The US doesn't have effective gun control laws, so getting shot is a much higher risk in the US. Now they want to break encryption, which means that getting hacked can only be a higher risk.
Well, since the one device in question won't be updated, there's no reason to say "obstruction of justice." Also, there is no proof that the phone in question even has any evidence. Their arguments are FAR FAR from probable cause.
I know you're just trying to be funny, but when the shit hits the fan the military and law enforcement will be on our side, not the government's.
Duh-lease, don't make me laugh. What's the FBI? Time to move the source code and the signing key to Germany.Germany has a special hate for domestic spying. Heck, even set up a head office there and move the staff in charge of security there.
The votes that count in this election are the independents - they are larger than both the democrats and the republicans. You can't win an election without them, and Hillary is not trusted by most of them.
Read the rest - the three experts called in after that did not use "points of identification" - they had the actual fingerprints to look at. You really don't want to admit you were wrong.
None of this negates the fact that Hillary Clinton is, to all appearances, the tool of Wall Street. If the dems go with her, any republican win is on them.
The people who can't afford it now are often people who didn't expect to lose their jobs because of an illness with permanent effects. They made what was a logical choice, and contributed to that society.
I'm very happy with our single payer health system - pretty much all of us are. I hate government supported housing because it leads to supposed non-profit co-ops making a mint off the poor with substandard housing (and if you live in such a dwelling you have no legal recourse against the landlord). All it does is create ghettos.
There is no "on the other side of" or "on the same side of", any more than you could apply the term to any other male and female. It's total nonsense. On the near side of what, exactly - "normal", "male", "female". Cisgender is a bogus made-up term. Transsexuals never used such terms among themselves or with their doctors. There is ZERO proof that transsexuals did, and yet there's lots of proof that transvestites, including many who are gay, wanted to legitimacy of transsexualism - hence the word transgender, and also cisgender.
The stonewall riots were started by a gay transvestite - not a transsexual. Marsha P. Johnson was a drag queen, and Jack Daniel Whitehall (aka Jacqui Hormona) was also a gay man. Labeling them "transgender" has nothing to do with their being transsexual because they weren't, and it is exactly this sort of bullsh*t that we are fed up with - being tied into gay violence.
Nope. The DSM5 categorizes someone who gets a thrill out of crossdressing as having a transvestic disorder or paraphilia, including those who are diagnosed with "autogynephilia".Has nothing to do with transsexualism.
Transsexualism in and of itself is no longer considered a disorder in the DSM5. Gender dysphora is no longer, in itself, considered a mental disorder. The problem is the stress caused by the discord between the gender one sees oneself as and the biological gender. It is that discord that is treated by hormones, transitioning, and various surgeries, which help resolve the conflict.
Transsexuals and transvestites do not "experience a common oppression." A transvestite can always revert to his male role once he's satisfied his erotic needs. They can "hide in plain sight," doing their thing in the privacy of their home or at a gay bar, then resuming normal life. No need to let their kids, other family, friends, co-workers and employers, the bank, landlord, the neighbor next door, the license bureau/DMV, or anyone else they interact with daily in on their little secret, because it's only a temporary role.
As far as I can tell, we don't know who killed either of them, so it appears your statement is more of an assumption, especially since many transsexuals are murdered by men who are suppressing their own homosexuality. BTW, the worldwide murder rate for transsexuals is far below the average, a fact that nobody wants to point out because it doesn't fit the victim story arc. Don't take my word for it - do the math.
As far as wanting a divorce from the LGBT, who appointed you arbiter as to what we want. It's not just me, not by a long shot. We were socially acceptable back in the time of Christine Jorgensen, who appeared on magazine covers, gave talks, etc. That changed with the whole LGBT movement, which resorted to frequent incidents of violence (let's call them what they were - riots). Then we got hit by the moral majority because we were seen to be part of the LGB, rather than people with a medical condition. Now we're socially acceptable again - much more so than cross-dressers - and we don't need the hassles and confusion they bring to the table when people don't understand the basic difference.
Also, damages to a car from an accident are a civil matter (an accident is not a criminal event) - the police don't have jurisdiction, and not filing a report is not uncommon. Not everything that happens to someone who is trans is because of being trans. They also don't generally allow the party any information they have on the other party because of privacy laws. And I seriously doubt the person who caused the accident did it on purpose because Jacqui was trans. Doesn't make it right, but it happens to everyone.
When you know your co-workers and bosses actively hate people like you, you LEAVE. Or you come out and explain it to them, and see if they will accept it, or again, you LEAVE. And don't start with the "blaming the victim" sh*t - common sense beats political correctness, and the same advice would be good in any work situation where people hate you for any reason. If you can't fix it, you leave, or you have accepted the risks.
Power is not the motivator for rape any more than a thief is exercising power over someone by stealing your smartphone. The goal for the rapist is sex; the goal for the thief is a free iphone. You've been brainwashed into believing something that is politically correct but not only wrong, but incredibly stupid.
Autogynephilia has been debunked. It was created with no evidence by Ray Blanchard, who interpreted other's behavior though the lens of his in-the-closet gayness.
Sure, transvestites are free to do whatever they want - except try to tell us how we should act, and that we're just like them - men in dresses. Just because they get their thrills from dressing like women doesn't mean they're like us in any way.
They've been acting like dicks for ages, and we want a divorce.
Not everybody with a disability receives disability payments. Many street people, including former vets, have mental problems and have fallen through the cracks.
Also, the question is how someone is supposed to make the move without any support on the other end set up - no doctors familiar with their case, no local support, no family or friends... no rational adult will cut themselves from that if they can help it, because the result can be deadly. I bet you couldn't do it.
Living in a small town guarantees worse health care. It's not like the specialists are working in the little towns. Many people find that their choice of place to live is based on where their doctors work - I know people who retired and thought they'd move to the boonies, but nope - no way are they going to live somewhere where they can't be transported to a major hospital quickly. And this week a couple who are living in the boonies have made the decision to sell everything and move to the big city only because there are relatives already there who have scouted out options for them, taking into account their health limitations.
The doctors have done a good job restoring much of my sight - if I had been living in the boonies, I'd be permanently blind already instead of waiting for the inevitable. It's the same with the PTSD and MDD. There are more options inside a city with a few million people, even more than a smaller city like San Francisco.
Obviously they won't reveal what they have until they're ready. And the fact that there is an ongoing investigation is usually sufficient for the individual to voluntarily step aside during the investigation. So, why should Clinton be an exception?
Think for two seconds. As you say, cis is latin for trans - so how are normal people somehow labeled the equivalent of trans-gendered? Like I said, we never used it until the gay rights movement assimilated us. Now we're kicking back. We've always supported their rights, but enough is enough - we're long overdue for a divorce.
The bathroom bills will fail in court. Also, it's going to be extremely hard to apply in practice. The first trans-male that is forced to enter the girls washroom will get SO many complaints that they really should be in the boy's room. This is just the law of unintended consequences in action. That's why many of us are actually laughing at the "bathroom bill" nut cases.
Also, how are they going to enforce this on an adult? And what's going to happen when they try to on a post-op and insist on looking in her panties? Hey, nice lawsuit you got there... and that's if they get a court to issue a search warrant. Ludicrous.
And no, the battle isn't being fought over the term cisgender. It's because we are not the same as gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transvestites - there's a big difference between sexual activity and gender identity based on brain structure. But nice try to reframe the question. Ain't going to work. They've screwed us over too many times, and their ways, such as protests, are not our ways.
Transvestites are sexually excited by their fetish so sure, lump them with the LGB. They're free to do whatever they want, and we should all keep an open mind about it. However, transsexuals and intersexed have zero to do with sexual behavior, which is the common attribute that groups lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and drag queens / transvestites.
And yet Sanders beats everyone with better numbers. Normally, when a politician is under investigation by the FBI for more than half a year, they step aside and let someone else carry the water.
The FBI, under a democratic president, has been investigating Clinton since last August, but they only revealed the investigation last month. And they're still investigating...
She still hasn't released those speeches she gave to wall street - one of which she was paid $415,00 for. She only changed her position on same-sex marriage after it was obvious which way the wind was blowing. She sent secret information to people who were not supposed to be privy to it (to which the email server is just incidentally involved).
That's three to start.
The current FBI investigation has been going on since last August, but only confirmed in February. And this has nothing to do with republicans - this is an FBI probe under a Democratic president.
On the positive side, 8% of Americans say they like her, 7% describe her as capable and qualified, 5% as experienced, 3% as strong and 3% as a good politician. Smaller percentages consider her honest or smart.
Overall, 29% of Americans offer a positive observation about Clinton while 51% express something negative. The rest have either a neutral comment or no opinion. This loosely fits with her overall image among national adults as measured on Gallup tracking, which is 42% favorable and 51% unfavorable.
These are the same number she had in 2008, and she lost then. The only candidate with overall positive numbers as Sanders.
Slashdot Mirror
The "Trans Day Of Remembrance" is fear mongering for political gain and power, same as any other big lie. Do the math.
Jorgensen was feted everywhere she went. There was none of the crap we saw after the whole push for LGB rights claimed us as part of them.
Doesn't matter that your country is so f*cked up wrt violence. The only violence on the radar here towards transsexuals is those who are foolish enough to live in the gay village, afraid because they are too afraid to leave the "protection" of the gay ghetto because, gee whiz, it must be even worse elsewhere - though it's not. The US is seriously screwed, as are many latin american, african, and asian countries.
Using common sense to avoid getting beaten or killed is not "blaming the victim." You can walk across the street because you have the right of way, but when you get killed you'll be "dead right." Saying "Mr Car Driver, don't run me over because I have every right to be because YOU are violated MY civil rights." If you don't sell sex or drugs or hang around with those who do you are far less likely to be targeted. The number one rule of survival is DON'T BE STUPID. Doing illegal crap pretty much guarantees that people can mess you up and you most likely won't go to the cops. If you can't figure that out, Darwin is waiting, same as anyone else of whatever background.
Also, transsexuals have no need for a spokesperson. We are better off without the political bullsh*t that the gay rights movement loves playing. We don't need any more splashback. That isn't speaking for the rest - it's just an observation that we're tired of being misused and misrepresented by what is now known as the white gay mafia.
21 people in ten months is nothing. A drop in the bucket. As I said before, the murder rate for transsexuals is far lower than the general population - and you can't include cross-dressers in that stat because it's an apples-oranges comparison. So quit trying to justify the LGB narrative towards transsexuals. It's total bullshit.
Unfortunately, you have to keep in mind that the US has used CSIS to snoop on communications that the US was forbidden from snooping on first-hand. Also, Canada is part of 5-eyes. I wouldn't trust our government in this matter any more than I would trust the US. Now Merkel and other european governments are pissed that the US was spying on their personal phones ... and then there's relocating to Cuba ...
So then the world gets 2 iphones - unbreakable and gov-rapeable. Guess which will be in bigger demand by those working in government, such as the FBI?
Apple isn't morally obliged to break constitutional rights, any more than they are morally obliged to break into your house and go through your sh*t.
The US doesn't have effective gun control laws, so getting shot is a much higher risk in the US. Now they want to break encryption, which means that getting hacked can only be a higher risk.
Well, since the one device in question won't be updated, there's no reason to say "obstruction of justice." Also, there is no proof that the phone in question even has any evidence. Their arguments are FAR FAR from probable cause.
I know you're just trying to be funny, but when the shit hits the fan the military and law enforcement will be on our side, not the government's.
Duh-lease, don't make me laugh. What's the FBI? Time to move the source code and the signing key to Germany.Germany has a special hate for domestic spying. Heck, even set up a head office there and move the staff in charge of security there.
Why do people want to stick everything in a web browser? It's like they want us to have only one tool (the browser), to rule them all ...
The votes that count in this election are the independents - they are larger than both the democrats and the republicans. You can't win an election without them, and Hillary is not trusted by most of them.
Read the rest - the three experts called in after that did not use "points of identification" - they had the actual fingerprints to look at. You really don't want to admit you were wrong.
None of this negates the fact that Hillary Clinton is, to all appearances, the tool of Wall Street. If the dems go with her, any republican win is on them.
The people who can't afford it now are often people who didn't expect to lose their jobs because of an illness with permanent effects. They made what was a logical choice, and contributed to that society.
I'm very happy with our single payer health system - pretty much all of us are. I hate government supported housing because it leads to supposed non-profit co-ops making a mint off the poor with substandard housing (and if you live in such a dwelling you have no legal recourse against the landlord). All it does is create ghettos.
There is no "on the other side of" or "on the same side of", any more than you could apply the term to any other male and female. It's total nonsense. On the near side of what, exactly - "normal", "male", "female". Cisgender is a bogus made-up term. Transsexuals never used such terms among themselves or with their doctors. There is ZERO proof that transsexuals did, and yet there's lots of proof that transvestites, including many who are gay, wanted to legitimacy of transsexualism - hence the word transgender, and also cisgender.
The stonewall riots were started by a gay transvestite - not a transsexual. Marsha P. Johnson was a drag queen, and Jack Daniel Whitehall (aka Jacqui Hormona) was also a gay man. Labeling them "transgender" has nothing to do with their being transsexual because they weren't, and it is exactly this sort of bullsh*t that we are fed up with - being tied into gay violence.
Nope. The DSM5 categorizes someone who gets a thrill out of crossdressing as having a transvestic disorder or paraphilia, including those who are diagnosed with "autogynephilia".Has nothing to do with transsexualism.
Transsexualism in and of itself is no longer considered a disorder in the DSM5. Gender dysphora is no longer, in itself, considered a mental disorder. The problem is the stress caused by the discord between the gender one sees oneself as and the biological gender. It is that discord that is treated by hormones, transitioning, and various surgeries, which help resolve the conflict.
Transsexuals and transvestites do not "experience a common oppression." A transvestite can always revert to his male role once he's satisfied his erotic needs. They can "hide in plain sight," doing their thing in the privacy of their home or at a gay bar, then resuming normal life. No need to let their kids, other family, friends, co-workers and employers, the bank, landlord, the neighbor next door, the license bureau/DMV, or anyone else they interact with daily in on their little secret, because it's only a temporary role.
As far as I can tell, we don't know who killed either of them, so it appears your statement is more of an assumption, especially since many transsexuals are murdered by men who are suppressing their own homosexuality. BTW, the worldwide murder rate for transsexuals is far below the average, a fact that nobody wants to point out because it doesn't fit the victim story arc. Don't take my word for it - do the math.
As far as wanting a divorce from the LGBT, who appointed you arbiter as to what we want. It's not just me, not by a long shot. We were socially acceptable back in the time of Christine Jorgensen, who appeared on magazine covers, gave talks, etc. That changed with the whole LGBT movement, which resorted to frequent incidents of violence (let's call them what they were - riots). Then we got hit by the moral majority because we were seen to be part of the LGB, rather than people with a medical condition. Now we're socially acceptable again - much more so than cross-dressers - and we don't need the hassles and confusion they bring to the table when people don't understand the basic difference.
Also, damages to a car from an accident are a civil matter (an accident is not a criminal event) - the police don't have jurisdiction, and not filing a report is not uncommon. Not everything that happens to someone who is trans is because of being trans. They also don't generally allow the party any information they have on the other party because of privacy laws. And I seriously doubt the person who caused the accident did it on purpose because Jacqui was trans. Doesn't make it right, but it happens to everyone.
When you know your co-workers and bosses actively hate people like you, you LEAVE. Or you come out and explain it to them, and see if they will accept it, or again, you LEAVE. And don't start with the "blaming the victim" sh*t - common sense beats political correctness, and the same advice would be good in any work situation where people hate you for any reason. If you can't fix it, you leave, or you have accepted the risks.
microsoft.com as opposed to microsoftc.om - the problem IS kerning - the dot takes up less space.
Power is not the motivator for rape any more than a thief is exercising power over someone by stealing your smartphone. The goal for the rapist is sex; the goal for the thief is a free iphone. You've been brainwashed into believing something that is politically correct but not only wrong, but incredibly stupid.
Autogynephilia has been debunked. It was created with no evidence by Ray Blanchard, who interpreted other's behavior though the lens of his in-the-closet gayness.
Sure, transvestites are free to do whatever they want - except try to tell us how we should act, and that we're just like them - men in dresses. Just because they get their thrills from dressing like women doesn't mean they're like us in any way.
They've been acting like dicks for ages, and we want a divorce.
Not everybody with a disability receives disability payments. Many street people, including former vets, have mental problems and have fallen through the cracks.
Also, the question is how someone is supposed to make the move without any support on the other end set up - no doctors familiar with their case, no local support, no family or friends ... no rational adult will cut themselves from that if they can help it, because the result can be deadly. I bet you couldn't do it.
Living in a small town guarantees worse health care. It's not like the specialists are working in the little towns. Many people find that their choice of place to live is based on where their doctors work - I know people who retired and thought they'd move to the boonies, but nope - no way are they going to live somewhere where they can't be transported to a major hospital quickly. And this week a couple who are living in the boonies have made the decision to sell everything and move to the big city only because there are relatives already there who have scouted out options for them, taking into account their health limitations.
The doctors have done a good job restoring much of my sight - if I had been living in the boonies, I'd be permanently blind already instead of waiting for the inevitable. It's the same with the PTSD and MDD. There are more options inside a city with a few million people, even more than a smaller city like San Francisco.
The easy fix is to switch to a fixed-width, fixed-size font so that things like bankofarnerica don't look like bankofamerica, etc.
Obviously they won't reveal what they have until they're ready. And the fact that there is an ongoing investigation is usually sufficient for the individual to voluntarily step aside during the investigation. So, why should Clinton be an exception?
Think for two seconds. As you say, cis is latin for trans - so how are normal people somehow labeled the equivalent of trans-gendered? Like I said, we never used it until the gay rights movement assimilated us. Now we're kicking back. We've always supported their rights, but enough is enough - we're long overdue for a divorce.
The bathroom bills will fail in court. Also, it's going to be extremely hard to apply in practice. The first trans-male that is forced to enter the girls washroom will get SO many complaints that they really should be in the boy's room. This is just the law of unintended consequences in action. That's why many of us are actually laughing at the "bathroom bill" nut cases.
Also, how are they going to enforce this on an adult? And what's going to happen when they try to on a post-op and insist on looking in her panties? Hey, nice lawsuit you got there ... and that's if they get a court to issue a search warrant. Ludicrous.
And no, the battle isn't being fought over the term cisgender. It's because we are not the same as gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transvestites - there's a big difference between sexual activity and gender identity based on brain structure. But nice try to reframe the question. Ain't going to work. They've screwed us over too many times, and their ways, such as protests, are not our ways.
Transvestites are sexually excited by their fetish so sure, lump them with the LGB. They're free to do whatever they want, and we should all keep an open mind about it. However, transsexuals and intersexed have zero to do with sexual behavior, which is the common attribute that groups lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and drag queens / transvestites.
They just do't get it.
And yet Sanders beats everyone with better numbers. Normally, when a politician is under investigation by the FBI for more than half a year, they step aside and let someone else carry the water.
The FBI, under a democratic president, has been investigating Clinton since last August, but they only revealed the investigation last month. And they're still investigating ...
She still hasn't released those speeches she gave to wall street - one of which she was paid $415,00 for. She only changed her position on same-sex marriage after it was obvious which way the wind was blowing. She sent secret information to people who were not supposed to be privy to it (to which the email server is just incidentally involved).
That's three to start.
The current FBI investigation has been going on since last August, but only confirmed in February. And this has nothing to do with republicans - this is an FBI probe under a Democratic president.
Clinton is Not liked or trusted by a majority of the voters.
On the positive side, 8% of Americans say they like her, 7% describe her as capable and qualified, 5% as experienced, 3% as strong and 3% as a good politician. Smaller percentages consider her honest or smart.
Overall, 29% of Americans offer a positive observation about Clinton while 51% express something negative. The rest have either a neutral comment or no opinion. This loosely fits with her overall image among national adults as measured on Gallup tracking, which is 42% favorable and 51% unfavorable.
These are the same number she had in 2008, and she lost then. The only candidate with overall positive numbers as Sanders.