MS should be investigated too. Pushing a phone UI on their monopoly desktop OS to sell phones and tablets sucks for everyone.
Seriously, MS's attempts to push things have done more to advance linux on the desktop than anything else. Look at Vista and Win 8
Which doesn't add up since XP, Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 8.1 are still all more popular as a desktop/laptop OS than all variants of Linux combined.
So, you're assuming that the people who held this for 20 years were complete dummies who went to the trouble of setting up to take pictures and only took a picture of one page. Hardly realistic or reasonable, if only so that they could have it authenticated without having to ship the original out.
To put it into a nerd context, if you had an Action Comics #1 or Superman #1 and someone wanted to see if it was intact, you wouldn't sent it to them or any other grading service - you'd send them pictures of the actual pages so that they could ascertain that they're all there and in good shape.
It's not a problem for most people, but I bet the people they're going to send include faggots who can't go a week without putting their erect penis up another man's anus.
That's probably by design - they don't want people giving birth to kids with severe radiation damage from the get-go.
Just send ONE person. Someone who enjoys being alone and has their own projects to work on to keep them entertained. No interpersonal friction. A lot fewer resources required. Throw in a decent digital library, a stock of antidepressants, and you're good to go.
The app in this case is the browser. Without some kind of push from the server mechanism, web based applications need to resort to something like polling. While that works, it's less than ideal.
Leaving a connection open but idle for long periods of time while waiting for an update that "might" be coming is also "less than ideal." The browser is still a poor substitute for a real application, and always will be. Even Apple had to yield on this - the original idea for apps on the iPhone was basically web apps. The market vehemently rejected it.
The web is far from the most complex device ever built by humans. It's no more a single engineering project than the old landline telephone system was. Heck, if you're just looking for replicating the same thing over and over as THE measure of complexity, look at any large city. The space shuttle was far more complex.
How could reading the article change reality? If the private owner doesn't digitize it your assumption is still an assumption without evidence.
The reality is that the books pages are already photographed, which you would have seen if you had RTFA, but that's okay, keep arguing for no purpose. Museums are fast becoming mausoleums anyway.
I guess you didn't read the article. There's a picture from one of the pages of the manuscript, and the handwriting is terrible. Or this:
Turing left all his papers, including the notebook, to his friend and fellow mathematician Robin Gandy. Gandy turned Turing’s dream journals over to a psychiatrist, who burned them, and gave Turing’s scientific papers to Kings College. Gandy however kept this one notebook because in the middle of it, in some blank pages, he wrote his own private journal.
Gandy died in 1995, and the current owner of the manuscript was not disclosed by the auction house.
You can be sure that in the 20 years preceding putting it up for auction, it was either photographed or photocopied, or more likely, both.
No, it won't - not in a museum behind a glass case. So, worst-case scenario is "same diff." And if copyright has expired, there's no problem with anyone who has a copy of the text to post it.
For that to actually work, they'd have to shadow-ban trolls. Otherwise the trolls will just create yet another account. Can also be done with anonymous trolls based on combo of content and ip.
I find it sad that this history for the world might be buried in some collector's safe instead of in a museum where our world society should be able to appreciate its significance.
For stuff like manuscripts, museums are pretty much obsolete. What matters is what's on the paper, not the paper itself, so a hi-res picture is just as good, and a plain-text searchable copy is even better.
Please read the entire link as that is not the only thing discussed.
I get it. You have some infinitely for her and don't want to think she did anything wrong. But what you want and reality can be different and this may be one of those times. You simply cannot say nothing was illegal until everything is known.
And nobody can say that anything WAS illegal. This is just hand-waving.
Personally, I think Hillary could have won in 2008 if she had given Bill the boot for behaving like a hound dog. So I don't have any "infinitely" for her, nor an affinity for her. Just that I look at the reality of the race and it's going to be a very expensive coronation because while Hilary and First Dude Bill might be a pair of deuces, the right has nothing better than a busted flush.
Who says they would? Not me. You can receive all the official emails you want, doesn't mean they never resorted to unofficial email, same as you can drink all the water you want, doesn't mean you never drank coffee.
Slashdot Mirror
Why would anyone want to use a system that isn't based on unique domain names?
Or build his own ... and it's not like if you didn't like IE you couldn't install another browser.
MS should be investigated too. Pushing a phone UI on their monopoly desktop OS to sell phones and tablets sucks for everyone.
Seriously, MS's attempts to push things have done more to advance linux on the desktop than anything else. Look at Vista and Win 8
Which doesn't add up since XP, Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 8.1 are still all more popular as a desktop/laptop OS than all variants of Linux combined.
Your definition of "good enough" is defective, given the ongoing history of security flaws and bloat.
So, you're assuming that the people who held this for 20 years were complete dummies who went to the trouble of setting up to take pictures and only took a picture of one page. Hardly realistic or reasonable, if only so that they could have it authenticated without having to ship the original out.
To put it into a nerd context, if you had an Action Comics #1 or Superman #1 and someone wanted to see if it was intact, you wouldn't sent it to them or any other grading service - you'd send them pictures of the actual pages so that they could ascertain that they're all there and in good shape.
It's not a problem for most people, but I bet the people they're going to send include faggots who can't go a week without putting their erect penis up another man's anus.
That's probably by design - they don't want people giving birth to kids with severe radiation damage from the get-go.
Just send ONE person. Someone who enjoys being alone and has their own projects to work on to keep them entertained. No interpersonal friction. A lot fewer resources required. Throw in a decent digital library, a stock of antidepressants, and you're good to go.
Better to wait for the Antarctic ice cap to melt, then we can move all the people from what used to be the worlds' coasts there.
Who said Mars One was useless! http://www.mars-one.com/techno...
Will never happen. Not even their "space relay communications satellites." Noah Money" will see to that.
The app in this case is the browser. Without some kind of push from the server mechanism, web based applications need to resort to something like polling. While that works, it's less than ideal.
Leaving a connection open but idle for long periods of time while waiting for an update that "might" be coming is also "less than ideal." The browser is still a poor substitute for a real application, and always will be. Even Apple had to yield on this - the original idea for apps on the iPhone was basically web apps. The market vehemently rejected it.
... to be continued ... or not to be continued ... THAT is the question :-)
The web is far from the most complex device ever built by humans. It's no more a single engineering project than the old landline telephone system was. Heck, if you're just looking for replicating the same thing over and over as THE measure of complexity, look at any large city. The space shuttle was far more complex.
How could reading the article change reality? If the private owner doesn't digitize it your assumption is still an assumption without evidence.
The reality is that the books pages are already photographed, which you would have seen if you had RTFA, but that's okay, keep arguing for no purpose. Museums are fast becoming mausoleums anyway.
We already have a better mechanism for that on smartphones - you can turn notifications on or off on an app-by-app basis.
Time for a new AlterNIC, but without any TLDs?
"The web was once the greatest creation that humankind had ever managed to build."
Wow, it's obvious you don't get out much.
How long before malware opts in for you "for your convenience"?
Accidentally visit a pr0n site?
Even after you leave
And clear your browsing history
Don't you be deceived
You give your presentation
On the conference room screen
Up pops a message
"More from the gay porn scene!!!"
"You're into coprophagia"
"Here's some more new sh*t!"
"Wow, your wife gives you anal"
"With her strap-on dick?"
"We need some more nude photos"
"Like you sent us the last time."
"Need more bestiality?"
"We've got it all on line"
You claim your innocence
And protest "It's not mine!"
But you still end up
In the unemployment line.
Burma Shave "Come back to our
Turing left all his papers, including the notebook, to his friend and fellow mathematician Robin Gandy. Gandy turned Turing’s dream journals over to a psychiatrist, who burned them, and gave Turing’s scientific papers to Kings College. Gandy however kept this one notebook because in the middle of it, in some blank pages, he wrote his own private journal.
Gandy died in 1995, and the current owner of the manuscript was not disclosed by the auction house.
You can be sure that in the 20 years preceding putting it up for auction, it was either photographed or photocopied, or more likely, both.
No, it won't - not in a museum behind a glass case. So, worst-case scenario is "same diff." And if copyright has expired, there's no problem with anyone who has a copy of the text to post it.
For that to actually work, they'd have to shadow-ban trolls. Otherwise the trolls will just create yet another account. Can also be done with anonymous trolls based on combo of content and ip.
Go look at all those wonderful portrait pictures on Tumblr. What format are the vast majority in?
So now "stupid" is a photo format? Learn something new every day.
I find it sad that this history for the world might be buried in some collector's safe instead of in a museum where our world society should be able to appreciate its significance.
For stuff like manuscripts, museums are pretty much obsolete. What matters is what's on the paper, not the paper itself, so a hi-res picture is just as good, and a plain-text searchable copy is even better.
Please read the entire link as that is not the only thing discussed.
I get it. You have some infinitely for her and don't want to think she did anything wrong. But what you want and reality can be different and this may be one of those times. You simply cannot say nothing was illegal until everything is known.
And nobody can say that anything WAS illegal. This is just hand-waving.
Personally, I think Hillary could have won in 2008 if she had given Bill the boot for behaving like a hound dog. So I don't have any "infinitely" for her, nor an affinity for her. Just that I look at the reality of the race and it's going to be a very expensive coronation because while Hilary and First Dude Bill might be a pair of deuces, the right has nothing better than a busted flush.
Who says they would? Not me. You can receive all the official emails you want, doesn't mean they never resorted to unofficial email, same as you can drink all the water you want, doesn't mean you never drank coffee.