Guess it doesn't work too well - I've never tasted a McRib. Then again, I haven't bought from McDonalds this century... so I guess I don't know what I'm missing. Poor me:-)
So, a skin flicks for a cause:-) That's not a bad idea, taking pictures to keep track of whether things are growing or changing shape. Maybe you should submit it as a story on do-it-yourself health monitoring that could save your life.
It's all insurance providers. Hopefully AI can detect them as a cancer on the system and take appropriate action, because human politicians with their eyes on campaign contributions sure as hell can't.
Doesn't matter if it's AI or not, not if it can take you job away from you. And it will - not just the assembly-line jobs, but the office jobs, the programming jobs, pretty much anything. You are replaceable. You will be replaced. You need to get over it - here, let me connect you with the robopsychiatrist.
So what? Those are for people who buy a license from the pool. There is NOTHING to stop a member of the patent pool to also license their patents outside the pool under their own terms and conditions - there is no exclusivity.
He's asking "since when did GMail allow javascript"? Used to be that if you wanted to send some javascript source to someone else, you had to zip it with a password ir it wouldn't be allowed.
Or you can try to invalidate the patent under the "mis a scene" doctrine. Just that manufacturers are too chickenshit to risk losing if they try. Cheaper to pay. Plus, "fair and reasonable" does NOT necessarily mean "the same price."
Are you fucking sick? The differences between freebsd and linux are a few header files and some conditional includes - works fine on both platforms. Or do you think that it's mandatory to include windows when writing server software? Which would make you doubly sick.
You're right. It's been years since I've been able to code... (wasn't able to read for a couple of years, had a concussion (and probably seizures from too low blood sugar - 0.9 is scary low, a personal record) that put me out for almost 2 hours, since then all attempts have failed until this week, where it appears to SLOWLY be coming back. Not the algorithms - they never left. Just the "okay, I'm sitting in front of the computer, I want to write some code, start the editor,... blank - nothing happens." Happened for a year back in the '90s after a sexual assault, the mind can be a strange thing.
Nowhere in the constitution does the phrase "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" appear wrt patents. To the contrary, it's all about exclusivity, baby. When the constitution was written, the pace of change wasn't as rapid as it was today, so a couple of decades of exclusivity was no big deal - now a couple of decades is all the time before the original invention is rendered totally obsolete anyway.
If the licensing fees are too high, create an alternative - that's how it works everywhere. Steak costs too much? Substitute chicken. Chicken costs too much? Substitute "processed food-like stuff."
Weren't timers originally disabled for pages in the background? Whose stupid idea was it to enable them? I'd like to see background pages completely disabled - downloads are handled by a separate mechanism anyway, so if you start a download and then go to another page, who cares?
Chinese law requires outside businesses to have partners owning 50% of any local ventures. They made an exception in Apple's case. They can pull that exception damn fast and Apple can find itself losing half of all assets (and profits) from Chinese operations.
Actually, I *did* publish my solution to the halting problem, under my original account, years ago. Got into a nice argument with an engineering grad student who couldn't find a hole in it.
Why use a whole library when you can do it quite easily with a page of code that is simpler, specific to the task at hand, and you don't have to worry about hidden side effects because you don't have to audit the whole damn library to find that one little piece makes the whole thing not thread-safe?
bsort is a much narrower domain, and is thus far less useful.
bsort() is used anywhere you have indexed data, unless the implementors are complete morons. It's been that way pretty much since the beginning - it's the obvious choice for searching sorted data.
Bill Clinton and the democrats had a majority in both houses when he signed the law into place. If they hadn't liked it, they could have stopped it - they had absolute majorities in the House of Congress, the Senate, and they also controlled the White House. They certainly had the power to re-write it, or not pass it, and a presidential veto would not have been overridden by republicans because there just weren't enough of them.
So show me ONE SINGLE REASON why anyone should believe that Clinton was opposed to it? The dems LOVED it, or they wouldn't have passed it. They sure as hell could have changed anything they wanted - but democratic fiscal policy then was pretty much the same as the neocons, same as Hillary is to the right of what passes for moderate republicans (like there's anything "moderate" in US politics any more).
"Where's my documented proof of opposing it?" I think you have it backwards - Clinton signed it because he supported it. If he were against it, he could have exercised his veto, and forced them to pass it over the veto. Except that the Democrats had control over both the House and the Senate, so if he had vetoed it, there were not enough votes to override his veto. So suck it up. YOU fucked up the election. Not me, not anyone else. Americans. Democrats in particular, by allowing corruption between the DNC and the Clinton campaign to nominate someone who even the polls said was going to to worse against Trump than Sanders. And now you whine about it?
Obama's approval ratings among Canadians used to be almost unanimous - same as all democrat presidents. Now 1/3 think that in the end he did more harm than good - just look at the middle east, record deficits, and refusal to bring in public single-payer health care as examples. His continued "red lines" that Russia and China and Syria crossed with impunity have left the US with less political clout than at any time in the last 100 years. And with China now ranking #1 in GDP when measured using purchasing power parity (because a buck, or it's equivalent in yuan, buys more there than it does in the US), and also #1 in fintech no matter how you measure it, you'd better hope that Trump makes buddy-buddy with Russia to serve as a counterweight to Chinese expansion.
That's the great part - bug counts are going to be far lower if you HAVE to have complete knowledge of what's going on. And you take that one-size-fits-all approach to everything you do, no matter what the language. You just follow the crowd, never thinking outside the box. And seriously, awk? What next - brag about knowing grep? That's just stuff that comes with the territory, same as framing a house, it's assumed you know what a hammer is and which end to hold.
So what - you nab the people at each end. That is deterrent enough - especially since the people at both ends are the ones attempting to launder the money.
And no other president appointed a member of the 1%? Give me a break. Obama appointed Clinton as secretary of state, definitely one of the 1%. Anyone with a net worth of $8.4 million is in the 1%. The money from her speeches alone puts her up there. She disclosed a net worth of $31 million to the Federal Elections Commission. Shouldn't you feel a little dirty now, knowing that Obama appointed 1%ers as well?
And YOU miss the point that a human, having better knowledge than the compiler can ever have (no, your "semantic analysis" won't tell the compiler to use bsort()) can do better with a smaller footprint, so fewer code paths to verify, fewer side effects, easier to check for and handle corner cases, etc.
Not my fault that YOU aren't that human. And that IS my point, at this point. You want one size fits all, because that's all you know.
People like you are the reason that people think running Doom in a web browser is somehow cool, even though it runs slower on a machine with 5,000x more cpu instructions executed per second than a 386, 2,000x more ram than that same old 386, 2,000x more video ram, but oh look - web.
You have yet to show ANY proof that Bill Clinton didn't sign the bill. He supported it. He could have refused to sign it.
Personally, as a Canadian I'm with the 95% of the world that thinks that the USA+Trump, and Great Britain+Brexit, are self-inflicted wounds. You both got the governments you deserved by your unabashed acceptance of faux news.
Of course, in the case of the USA, it was inevitable that you'd end up with only the worst candidates to choose from since you won't do any serious electoral finance reform. So, you get the government you deserve - on that, as Jimmy Carter put it, is bought and paid for by the rich. So, you got the worst government money can buy.
Slashdot Mirror
Guess it doesn't work too well - I've never tasted a McRib. Then again, I haven't bought from McDonalds this century ... so I guess I don't know what I'm missing. Poor me :-)
No, what I'm saying is that there's no law requiring FRAND - it's an agreement between private businesses.
So, a skin flicks for a cause :-) That's not a bad idea, taking pictures to keep track of whether things are growing or changing shape. Maybe you should submit it as a story on do-it-yourself health monitoring that could save your life.
It's all insurance providers. Hopefully AI can detect them as a cancer on the system and take appropriate action, because human politicians with their eyes on campaign contributions sure as hell can't.
Doesn't matter if it's AI or not, not if it can take you job away from you. And it will - not just the assembly-line jobs, but the office jobs, the programming jobs, pretty much anything. You are replaceable. You will be replaced. You need to get over it - here, let me connect you with the robopsychiatrist.
So what? Those are for people who buy a license from the pool. There is NOTHING to stop a member of the patent pool to also license their patents outside the pool under their own terms and conditions - there is no exclusivity.
He's asking "since when did GMail allow javascript"? Used to be that if you wanted to send some javascript source to someone else, you had to zip it with a password ir it wouldn't be allowed.
Or you can try to invalidate the patent under the "mis a scene" doctrine. Just that manufacturers are too chickenshit to risk losing if they try. Cheaper to pay. Plus, "fair and reasonable" does NOT necessarily mean "the same price."
It may appear in agreements, but those are VOLUNTARY patent pools - NOT obligations imposed by law. Go suck Fabien Mueller's cock some more, troll.
FRAND is a term used by trolls like Florian Mueller. You're known by the company you keep. Troll.
Are you fucking sick? The differences between freebsd and linux are a few header files and some conditional includes - works fine on both platforms. Or do you think that it's mandatory to include windows when writing server software? Which would make you doubly sick.
You're right. It's been years since I've been able to code ... (wasn't able to read for a couple of years, had a concussion (and probably seizures from too low blood sugar - 0.9 is scary low, a personal record) that put me out for almost 2 hours, since then all attempts have failed until this week, where it appears to SLOWLY be coming back. Not the algorithms - they never left. Just the "okay, I'm sitting in front of the computer, I want to write some code, start the editor, ... blank - nothing happens." Happened for a year back in the '90s after a sexual assault, the mind can be a strange thing.
Nowhere in the constitution does the phrase "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" appear wrt patents. To the contrary, it's all about exclusivity, baby. When the constitution was written, the pace of change wasn't as rapid as it was today, so a couple of decades of exclusivity was no big deal - now a couple of decades is all the time before the original invention is rendered totally obsolete anyway.
If the licensing fees are too high, create an alternative - that's how it works everywhere. Steak costs too much? Substitute chicken. Chicken costs too much? Substitute "processed food-like stuff."
Weren't timers originally disabled for pages in the background? Whose stupid idea was it to enable them? I'd like to see background pages completely disabled - downloads are handled by a separate mechanism anyway, so if you start a download and then go to another page, who cares?
Chinese law requires outside businesses to have partners owning 50% of any local ventures. They made an exception in Apple's case. They can pull that exception damn fast and Apple can find itself losing half of all assets (and profits) from Chinese operations.
Actually, I *did* publish my solution to the halting problem, under my original account, years ago. Got into a nice argument with an engineering grad student who couldn't find a hole in it.
Why use a whole library when you can do it quite easily with a page of code that is simpler, specific to the task at hand, and you don't have to worry about hidden side effects because you don't have to audit the whole damn library to find that one little piece makes the whole thing not thread-safe?
bsort is a much narrower domain, and is thus far less useful.
bsort() is used anywhere you have indexed data, unless the implementors are complete morons. It's been that way pretty much since the beginning - it's the obvious choice for searching sorted data.
Bill Clinton and the democrats had a majority in both houses when he signed the law into place. If they hadn't liked it, they could have stopped it - they had absolute majorities in the House of Congress, the Senate, and they also controlled the White House. They certainly had the power to re-write it, or not pass it, and a presidential veto would not have been overridden by republicans because there just weren't enough of them.
So show me ONE SINGLE REASON why anyone should believe that Clinton was opposed to it? The dems LOVED it, or they wouldn't have passed it. They sure as hell could have changed anything they wanted - but democratic fiscal policy then was pretty much the same as the neocons, same as Hillary is to the right of what passes for moderate republicans (like there's anything "moderate" in US politics any more).
"Where's my documented proof of opposing it?" I think you have it backwards - Clinton signed it because he supported it. If he were against it, he could have exercised his veto, and forced them to pass it over the veto. Except that the Democrats had control over both the House and the Senate, so if he had vetoed it, there were not enough votes to override his veto. So suck it up. YOU fucked up the election. Not me, not anyone else. Americans. Democrats in particular, by allowing corruption between the DNC and the Clinton campaign to nominate someone who even the polls said was going to to worse against Trump than Sanders. And now you whine about it?
Obama's approval ratings among Canadians used to be almost unanimous - same as all democrat presidents. Now 1/3 think that in the end he did more harm than good - just look at the middle east, record deficits, and refusal to bring in public single-payer health care as examples. His continued "red lines" that Russia and China and Syria crossed with impunity have left the US with less political clout than at any time in the last 100 years. And with China now ranking #1 in GDP when measured using purchasing power parity (because a buck, or it's equivalent in yuan, buys more there than it does in the US), and also #1 in fintech no matter how you measure it, you'd better hope that Trump makes buddy-buddy with Russia to serve as a counterweight to Chinese expansion.
That's the great part - bug counts are going to be far lower if you HAVE to have complete knowledge of what's going on. And you take that one-size-fits-all approach to everything you do, no matter what the language. You just follow the crowd, never thinking outside the box. And seriously, awk? What next - brag about knowing grep? That's just stuff that comes with the territory, same as framing a house, it's assumed you know what a hammer is and which end to hold.
So what - you nab the people at each end. That is deterrent enough - especially since the people at both ends are the ones attempting to launder the money.
And no other president appointed a member of the 1%? Give me a break. Obama appointed Clinton as secretary of state, definitely one of the 1%. Anyone with a net worth of $8.4 million is in the 1%. The money from her speeches alone puts her up there. She disclosed a net worth of $31 million to the Federal Elections Commission. Shouldn't you feel a little dirty now, knowing that Obama appointed 1%ers as well?
And YOU miss the point that a human, having better knowledge than the compiler can ever have (no, your "semantic analysis" won't tell the compiler to use bsort()) can do better with a smaller footprint, so fewer code paths to verify, fewer side effects, easier to check for and handle corner cases, etc.
Not my fault that YOU aren't that human. And that IS my point, at this point. You want one size fits all, because that's all you know.
People like you are the reason that people think running Doom in a web browser is somehow cool, even though it runs slower on a machine with 5,000x more cpu instructions executed per second than a 386, 2,000x more ram than that same old 386, 2,000x more video ram, but oh look - web.
You have yet to show ANY proof that Bill Clinton didn't sign the bill. He supported it. He could have refused to sign it.
Personally, as a Canadian I'm with the 95% of the world that thinks that the USA+Trump, and Great Britain+Brexit, are self-inflicted wounds. You both got the governments you deserved by your unabashed acceptance of faux news.
Of course, in the case of the USA, it was inevitable that you'd end up with only the worst candidates to choose from since you won't do any serious electoral finance reform. So, you get the government you deserve - on that, as Jimmy Carter put it, is bought and paid for by the rich. So, you got the worst government money can buy.
Either one would have been just as bad.