whatever man, u just don't know how to RTFM. Stating the FW-1 is an overrated product just goes to show u'r ignorance of the topic. I've messed with Gauntlet Raptor and PIX and NONE are as easy to setup and robust as FW-1. It's the only product out there that actually defines FW-1 (thanks to statefull inspection).
Earlier last week I revieved an email from our R&D group stating some performance numbers and a bit of comparison to NT. Not suprisingly an untuned linux box outperformed an NT box by 30% in some tests. Linux stomped all over NT in the entire matchup. In response to an ealier comment here, I suspect the GUI will be ported to Linux. I'm not a GUI programmer but we allready have a solaris motif GUI now, I guess it would just be library or two to make it work. Anyhow FW-1 is a great product, I'm not just saying that because I work there. It brings to Linux a real foot hold in the gateway/vpn arena, and with linuxs cheapness I think we will kick some ass next year. Hell we allready have over 65% of the market, beating out the likes of Cisco and all others. I will keep/.'ers up on the situation as it unfolds =p
10x Funnier then I hoped, a lil' to musical IMO
on
South Park The Movie
·
· Score: 1
The movie was all out hilarious, I heard to many song and dance routines but they were at the least amusing. I liked and wuld voluntarily see it again. P.s Any bootlegged copies around Yet???????
no body just a subject............... I rule BTW And don't spam me.... also one last tidbit while I'm here.. look into scp... though it's not a deamon per say it sedurely transfers files in the strongest of methods
1 10 ms * 2 3 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-gw10-fw-8-3.sprintlink.net [144.228.134.117]
4 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 208.12.128.2 5 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-bb11-fw-1-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.25] 6 30 ms 40 ms 30 ms sl-bb21-ana-5-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.8.174] 7 40 ms 40 ms 40 ms sl-bb4-ana-4-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.1.30] 8 30 ms 40 ms 40 ms lang1sr1-11-0.ca.us.ibm.net [165.87.157.98] 9 30 ms 40 ms 40 ms 165.87.32.114 10 180 ms 180 ms 191 ms sfra1br1-0-0-1.ca.us.ibm.net [165.87.230.202] 11 180 ms 200 ms 221 ms 165.87.13.30 12 201 ms 200 ms 190 ms 165.87.161.73 13 240 ms 251 ms 230 ms ded1-fe12-0-0.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.83] 14 230 ms 240 ms 241 ms 209.232.138.214 15 280 ms 290 ms 321 ms VA [206.170.14.76]
Slashdot Mirror
www.checkpoint.com no BS....
To take down a highly available (read: HA) and massive plumbed site like yahoo, must take some coordination and resources
you suck, and the GUI in Solaris will let you do it. You just have to know how, it's all about workstation objects and manual address x-lation rules
most everything you've said is lame, uninformed, naive ranting..... IMO
whatever man, u just don't know how to RTFM. Stating the FW-1 is an overrated product just goes to show u'r ignorance of the topic. I've messed with Gauntlet Raptor and PIX and NONE are as easy to setup and robust as FW-1. It's the only product out there that actually defines FW-1 (thanks to statefull inspection).
Earlier last week I revieved an email from our R&D group stating some performance numbers and a bit of comparison to NT. Not suprisingly an untuned linux box outperformed an NT box by 30% in some tests. Linux stomped all over NT in the entire matchup. In response to an ealier comment here, I suspect the GUI will be ported to Linux. I'm not a GUI programmer but we allready have a solaris motif GUI now, I guess it would just be library or two to make it work. Anyhow FW-1 is a great product, I'm not just saying that because I work there. It brings to Linux a real foot hold in the gateway/vpn arena, and with linuxs cheapness I think we will kick some ass next year. Hell we allready have over 65% of the market, beating out the likes of Cisco and all others. I will keep /.'ers up on the situation as it unfolds =p
Does that person care to comment on how he did his "scripting"?..........
Has it been cracked yet?
The movie was all out hilarious, I heard to many song and dance routines but they were at the least amusing. I liked and wuld voluntarily see it again. P.s Any bootlegged copies around Yet???????
More Kernls to Compile Downloads take awhile Did I spell that right? A kernel haiku(sp?)
no body just a subject............... I rule BTW And don't spam me.... also one last tidbit while I'm here.. look into scp... though it's not a deamon per say it sedurely transfers files in the strongest of methods
dude what are you talking about? Does your employer know you smoke crack??? Same something related to the discussion :p
1 10 ms * 2 3 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-gw10-fw-8-3.sprintlink.net [144.228.134.117]
4 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 208.12.128.2
5 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms sl-bb11-fw-1-1.sprintlink.net [144.232.11.25]
6 30 ms 40 ms 30 ms sl-bb21-ana-5-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.8.174]
7 40 ms 40 ms 40 ms sl-bb4-ana-4-0-0.sprintlink.net [144.232.1.30]
8 30 ms 40 ms 40 ms lang1sr1-11-0.ca.us.ibm.net [165.87.157.98]
9 30 ms 40 ms 40 ms 165.87.32.114
10 180 ms 180 ms 191 ms sfra1br1-0-0-1.ca.us.ibm.net [165.87.230.202]
11 180 ms 200 ms 221 ms 165.87.13.30
12 201 ms 200 ms 190 ms 165.87.161.73
13 240 ms 251 ms 230 ms ded1-fe12-0-0.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.83]
14 230 ms 240 ms 241 ms 209.232.138.214
15 280 ms 290 ms 321 ms VA [206.170.14.76]
Trace complete.
I'll host it on my web site...mail me
Hey you've gotta nice site! I hate to see your ISP bill......