Where are you guys getting this 'radical feminists' shit from anyway, given the overuse of certain terms like agenda, sounds like echoes of Fox and 'conservative' radio shitshows. Anyhow, the article or i kan reed has yet to make any 'radical' demands or remarks, I would actually go far as to say that they are fairly conservative liberal arguments that point towards problems in the path toward a superficial gender equity.
The study clearly defines its terms and methodology, you can keep beating ghosts, or straw women as some call it, but as with any ghosts, they are your frustrations manifest in your imaginary, so save yourself the trouble and your arms the strain and maybe listen for a change, perhaps there are other people who are right about certain things that you might not know about? People can still learn you know, its not like we are cast in stone after puberty.
If someone comes up to you and says that they are uncomfortable about something, do you say, 'but the statistics argue that i can be theoretically uncomfotable too'?, perhaps one could say 'I'm sorry to hear that, can we work on fixing that together'? People are pointing to a systemic challenge that they face in life that we can solve by just talking and establishing a communicated common ground and everybody goes up in arms and start yelling dumb neologisms like misandry without even engaging feminism in any sort of meaningful way apart from what has been reverberating Rush Limbaugh style from conservative networks onto the internet and echoing out back from tech circles.
Whenever there is an article that might indicate a gendered wrongdoing, slashdot gets their dicks tangled up in a knot faster than a 'first poster' can post a 'first post' post. Rather than trying up to come up with reasons why this article that goes beyond your beliefs is wrong, why not see the problem as it clearly exists? Might make you discomfortable sure, but hell is less discomfortable than what women(as well as LGBT people) report as being in the workplace. Given that this exists within a matrushka doll of gendered power hierarchies where men are empowered (... > expectations > education > career steps >...).. anyhow.. I am digressing here, just wanted to point out that this is not a problem of research methods or terminology but of being.
Slashdot Mirror
Where are you guys getting this 'radical feminists' shit from anyway, given the overuse of certain terms like agenda, sounds like echoes of Fox and 'conservative' radio shitshows. Anyhow, the article or i kan reed has yet to make any 'radical' demands or remarks, I would actually go far as to say that they are fairly conservative liberal arguments that point towards problems in the path toward a superficial gender equity. The study clearly defines its terms and methodology, you can keep beating ghosts, or straw women as some call it, but as with any ghosts, they are your frustrations manifest in your imaginary, so save yourself the trouble and your arms the strain and maybe listen for a change, perhaps there are other people who are right about certain things that you might not know about? People can still learn you know, its not like we are cast in stone after puberty.
If someone comes up to you and says that they are uncomfortable about something, do you say, 'but the statistics argue that i can be theoretically uncomfotable too'?, perhaps one could say 'I'm sorry to hear that, can we work on fixing that together'? People are pointing to a systemic challenge that they face in life that we can solve by just talking and establishing a communicated common ground and everybody goes up in arms and start yelling dumb neologisms like misandry without even engaging feminism in any sort of meaningful way apart from what has been reverberating Rush Limbaugh style from conservative networks onto the internet and echoing out back from tech circles. Whenever there is an article that might indicate a gendered wrongdoing, slashdot gets their dicks tangled up in a knot faster than a 'first poster' can post a 'first post' post. Rather than trying up to come up with reasons why this article that goes beyond your beliefs is wrong, why not see the problem as it clearly exists? Might make you discomfortable sure, but hell is less discomfortable than what women(as well as LGBT people) report as being in the workplace. Given that this exists within a matrushka doll of gendered power hierarchies where men are empowered (... > expectations > education > career steps > ...).. anyhow.. I am digressing here, just wanted to point out that this is not a problem of research methods or terminology but of being.