You've raised an important issue: that is democracy vs judaism. In a democracy once the arabs become the majority they can peacefully and democratically vote the state of Israel out of existence. So yes there is a contradiction between the two. We can continue this discussion if you so desire.
Zionist persecution? So when the arabs murdered 67 jews in cold blood in Hebron in 1929 was it the reaction to the "zionist persecution" of the local population? Or was it their anger over the liberated territories of 1967?
No the numbers are correct you just took them out of context: there are 5.5 million jews living in Israel surrounded by 300 million arabs whose slogan is "Yitbach al yahud" - slaughter the jew. If there was a one to one correspondence between the number of casualties on both sides then the arabs would've achieved their agenda a long time ago.
I should've probably been a little more specific in describing a terrorist: "freedom fighter" is a smoke screen used by Hamas. What they really mean by it is area free of any jewish presence. Throwing the jews into the see is still as relevant as ever in the arab world today. Otherwise, i agree with your post.
Is repeating what you heard on TV the best defense you can offer? Let me describe to you a typical terrorist: a person who grew up brainwashed with vile anti-semitic propaganda (something along the line of "Hitler didn't finish his job" with Hitler's Mein Kampf being on the best seller list for a few years in a row); his/her actions are based entirely on killing as many Jews as possible as a prerequisite of going to heaven and meeting the 72 virgins; blowing up as many civilians as possible while hiding behind women and children and the list goes on... If that's what you call a freedom fighter then i feel sorry for you. Second, Israel cannot " illegally occupy" the lands that belong to the Jews. The term "palestinian" was coined by the KGB in 1965, before that it was used to refer to the jews living in the area known as Palestine. I hope you know the history of how that piece of land got its name, if not i can repeat it for you.
I wonder if anybody can still remember how Microsoft threatened several security companies telling them not to publish the flaws discovered in Windows? Maybe that had something to do with the "less bugs" picture painted by Microsoft?
I used to have a friend who was in the soviet army back in the eighties. He told me that Gagarin was the first person to make it back alive and that there were a few unsuccessful attempts by the russians to put a man into orbit which ended up in a catastrophe.
While suing microsoft for all it's done to our industry is a good idea, nobody's immune to those kinds of law-suits. Concider, as an example, the ones filed recently against VA Linux and RedHat. It could be that microsoft, using its old tactics, is trying to engage their competitors in endless court battles, while not directly participating in the process.
Can we ever hope to see microsoft compete fairly in the near future? Is mud-slinging the only way for microsoft to "convince" its potential customers to buy their products?
Slashdot Mirror
it's just like an airline industry: a lot safer than driving your own car, but when something does happen the consequences are pretty severe.
You've raised an important issue: that is democracy vs judaism. In a democracy once the arabs become the majority they can peacefully and democratically vote the state of Israel out of existence. So yes there is a contradiction between the two. We can continue this discussion if you so desire.
Zionist persecution? So when the arabs murdered 67 jews in cold blood in Hebron in 1929 was it the reaction to the "zionist persecution" of the local population? Or was it their anger over the liberated territories of 1967?
It's amazing how you can make up stories and then fanatically believe in them as there is no truth whatsoever in what you wrote.
We don't need anybody's invitation. The land belongs to us. Period.
No the numbers are correct you just took them out of context: there are 5.5 million jews living in Israel surrounded by 300 million arabs whose slogan is "Yitbach al yahud" - slaughter the jew. If there was a one to one correspondence between the number of casualties on both sides then the arabs would've achieved their agenda a long time ago.
I should've probably been a little more specific in describing a terrorist: "freedom fighter" is a smoke screen used by Hamas. What they really mean by it is area free of any jewish presence. Throwing the jews into the see is still as relevant as ever in the arab world today. Otherwise, i agree with your post.
Is repeating what you heard on TV the best defense you can offer? Let me describe to you a typical terrorist: a person who grew up brainwashed with vile anti-semitic propaganda (something along the line of "Hitler didn't finish his job" with Hitler's Mein Kampf being on the best seller list for a few years in a row); his/her actions are based entirely on killing as many Jews as possible as a prerequisite of going to heaven and meeting the 72 virgins; blowing up as many civilians as possible while hiding behind women and children and the list goes on... If that's what you call a freedom fighter then i feel sorry for you. Second, Israel cannot " illegally occupy" the lands that belong to the Jews. The term "palestinian" was coined by the KGB in 1965, before that it was used to refer to the jews living in the area known as Palestine. I hope you know the history of how that piece of land got its name, if not i can repeat it for you.
I wonder if anybody can still remember how Microsoft threatened several security companies telling them not to publish the flaws discovered in Windows? Maybe that had something to do with the "less bugs" picture painted by Microsoft?
I used to have a friend who was in the soviet army back in the eighties. He told me that Gagarin was the first person to make it back alive and that there were a few unsuccessful attempts by the russians to put a man into orbit which ended up in a catastrophe.
While suing microsoft for all it's done to our industry is a good idea, nobody's immune to those kinds of law-suits. Concider, as an example, the ones filed recently against VA Linux and RedHat. It could be that microsoft, using its old tactics, is trying to engage their competitors in endless court battles, while not directly participating in the process.
..."We fully support data, directory and system interop with UNIX, Linux..." - no they don't. Where is support for ext2 or ext3?
Can we ever hope to see microsoft compete fairly in the near future? Is mud-slinging the only way for microsoft to "convince" its potential customers to buy their products?