Hmm, IIRC that was before the stock act (in other words it was legal for congress members to trade on info like that), and the guy lost money anyway so there's nothing really to complain about. Since you bring it up though, who do think would be more likely to yugely profit from their presidency? Be honest.
The point is, if you want to get money out of politics, you should be voting for Hillary. If you're more concerned about keeping muslims out of the US you should be voting for Trump. Yes HRC has made money from speaking fees paid by wall st d-bags but that doesn't bother me and won't go away if Citizens United is overturned anyway.
You just don't know when to quit, do you? Your claim is that all your grade school classmates can identify the carboniferous period within a few million years? Go ahead and call them, we'll wait.
I'm really just talking about the kissing. I mean, what percentage of kisses from DT were welcomed? That's got to be low single digits, even excluding Miss Universe. A lot of cringing involved in DT affection in other words. Downvoters, can you truly disagree with that premise? Here's a guy, just factually, is on his second trophy wife, runs beauty pageants for the gropes, has seemingly no delusion that the girls are maybe into it, but just goes for it anyway. It's gross, and we're supposed to vote for this guy and tell our daughters that this is acceptable behaviour for a world leader let alone a human being? Yuck.
No, what he said about Warren Buffett was right, nobody pays more taxes than they have to. So I agree with him that avoiding taxes is smart. Taking a $916M loss on the other hand makes him look bad, and if he hasn't paid takes since, that means he hasn't made that money back yet.
Well it's also to pressure him to show his taxes, which is sneaky because nobody really thinks there's going to be anything tying him to Russia in his tax filings, but there's certainly something that Donald doesn't want us to see. My bet is that he's not as rich as he wants us to think.
You haven't been paying attention. Hillary is the original opponent of Citizens United and has repeatedly pledged to overturn it. Trump wants to appoint a conservative justice to keep it in place. They both repeated their positions in the 2nd debate but you must have missed it.
You're delusional if you think CNN cares about politics. CNN cares about ratings. And Trump has benefited from CNN more than any candidate on the field, it just doesn't feel like that today.
I agree with you but politicians have to take money these days or else lose to their opponent who does. A conservative supreme court ruled 5-4 on Citizens United. Hillary was against it and if she gets in, she can put a liberal judge on the court and overturn it.
Slashdot Mirror
Put your money where your mouth is.
I'm voting for Hillary but I wouldn't leave my daughter alone with the Clintons either.
You think Clinton's campaign is feeling desperate? Vegas is paying out 6-1 on Trump presidency, but you know better, don't you?
She promised them she'd leave the door to the treasury building unlocked and they could just take whatever they wanted.
Word on the street is that it's a war started specifically to win the election, to whip up some patriotism for the ruling party.
And by the street do you mean Fox News and Drudge Report?
We're really escalating toward what could become war over completely unproven allegations that Russia hacked a...
Well on the bright side, a nuclear winter would offset global warming. Unless of course that's a Chinese hoax.
Also, Trump was a Democrat when he attacked those women, so in a way, Democrats were the problem the whole time.
Hmm, IIRC that was before the stock act (in other words it was legal for congress members to trade on info like that), and the guy lost money anyway so there's nothing really to complain about. Since you bring it up though, who do think would be more likely to yugely profit from their presidency? Be honest.
Considering that HRC is the most investigated candidate in history, I think it's fair to take a little peek at Trump.
You don't want to help them, because then homeless people will pour in from other areas. Solution: Criminalize poverty.
Seriously though, nothing good is going to happen at the city level. This is a symptom of a much bigger problem.
For your sake I hope it's not dying. Because then you'll have to find a new definition you can feel superior about knowing,
I'm trying to imagine OSX apps that do heavy lifting in the cloud. Siri maybe? What else?
The point is, if you want to get money out of politics, you should be voting for Hillary. If you're more concerned about keeping muslims out of the US you should be voting for Trump. Yes HRC has made money from speaking fees paid by wall st d-bags but that doesn't bother me and won't go away if Citizens United is overturned anyway.
You just don't know when to quit, do you? Your claim is that all your grade school classmates can identify the carboniferous period within a few million years? Go ahead and call them, we'll wait.
I'm really just talking about the kissing. I mean, what percentage of kisses from DT were welcomed? That's got to be low single digits, even excluding Miss Universe. A lot of cringing involved in DT affection in other words. Downvoters, can you truly disagree with that premise? Here's a guy, just factually, is on his second trophy wife, runs beauty pageants for the gropes, has seemingly no delusion that the girls are maybe into it, but just goes for it anyway. It's gross, and we're supposed to vote for this guy and tell our daughters that this is acceptable behaviour for a world leader let alone a human being? Yuck.
No, what he said about Warren Buffett was right, nobody pays more taxes than they have to. So I agree with him that avoiding taxes is smart. Taking a $916M loss on the other hand makes him look bad, and if he hasn't paid takes since, that means he hasn't made that money back yet.
No evidence of Donald Trump sexually assaulting women? What about every Miss Universe pageant ever?
Well it's also to pressure him to show his taxes, which is sneaky because nobody really thinks there's going to be anything tying him to Russia in his tax filings, but there's certainly something that Donald doesn't want us to see. My bet is that he's not as rich as he wants us to think.
You haven't been paying attention. Hillary is the original opponent of Citizens United and has repeatedly pledged to overturn it. Trump wants to appoint a conservative justice to keep it in place. They both repeated their positions in the 2nd debate but you must have missed it.
Um, unless you're a paleontologist you don't have this stuff memorized and you know it.
So "duh" right back at you. Didn't you learn this in grade school?
Be honest though, you just googled this right?
You're delusional if you think CNN cares about politics. CNN cares about ratings. And Trump has benefited from CNN more than any candidate on the field, it just doesn't feel like that today.
The old saying is being caught with a dead girl (Trump) or a live boy (Pence)
I agree with you but politicians have to take money these days or else lose to their opponent who does. A conservative supreme court ruled 5-4 on Citizens United. Hillary was against it and if she gets in, she can put a liberal judge on the court and overturn it.
They might as well flip a coin.