I get the impression it's quite the reverse. At least here it is.
The people who are afraid of overly performing students (there are a lot of them actually) are not the police, or national security or any such people but : 1) the teachers (most are a) quite dumb b) don't like to be challenged when they screw up a theory c) don't really know the subject) 2) fellow students (we've all watched the "nerd" movies)
Is for technically skilled people to have more children. Companies must embrace women and pregnancy, with daycare and . Only Darwin can help us here. They are the only way to increase the force of people capable and willing to be the next generation.
Iran's intentions ARE clear by choice. They built a heavy-water reactor and deuterium and tritium handling facilities. These are ONLY useful for a bomb.
You DO remember that movies belong in the "fiction" department, right ? To say the very least... it's not very easy. Definitely not to actually change a fingerprint.
First, it's not very easy to do it now, second an additional test that would easily defeat any approach like this would be a liveness test for the tissue on the scanner. Good luck emulating that.
That would enable very cheap readers to authenticate passports and holders, and no option to fake it.
Even if people were to succeed in faking it, a criminal (let's not go down the terrorist route for once) wouldn't be able to erase his old identity from the books without deep inside help, which would probably be noticed by too many people.
Thank you for providing such a detailed and well reasoned answer.
However I don't fully agree with you. Ask any priest, any bible scholar, or an expert in canon law what takes precedence : the principle of forgiveness and equality of treatment, regardless of crimes that Jezus preached or the laws from the old testament. The answer will be very clear.
Sorry but too many idiots just hit search or go to some muslim hate site and only then start critisizing the bible.
So ? Have you actually read the bible, instead of just hitting "search" or looking up what some muslim sites say about it ?
The new testament (as in the actions of God's son himself) clearly show how to deal with those "laws". Moderate christians follow the principles of the bible just as hard as other christians.
muslims imitate their pedophile (aisha) mass-murdering (khaybar, amongst others) "prophet". That is the highest islamic value. Killing innocent infidels and raping their wives and children. That is what the "prophet" did. That is what they do.
and then the actual real-life observation... since 9/11 there have been 6521 attacks on innocents by muslims, averaging 30 dead per attack. In fact muslims killed more infidels (and other muslims) since 9/11 than even the lancet's estimates of casualties in iraq
This guy has gotten 3 trials already. This guy would have first beheaded the children of you, before killing you. What do you mean "their level". It is a LONG way down till you're at their level
So are you saying those inmates are innocent ? Just because there is a difference, there necessarily is racism involved ? Maybe it simply is true what every statistic keeps repeating : immigrants commit many more crimes than natives. 20 or 30 times more. This is statistic is not isolated to america. Les than 30% of people in the belgian prisons are belgians. 4% of muslims in the UK perpetrate 72% of reported antisemitic attacks.
islam teaches muslims to kill infidel males, and rape infidel females. The statistic on rapes in brussels, unfortunately, confirms this is exactly what's happening. There are maybe 5% muslims, but they do nearly 60% of rapes. That's racism right there for you. Also note that in many muslim countries, it is either explicitly or de-facto legal to do so.
Or look at the case of ait oud. He's a muslim who raped and killed 2 children. Then he dumped them in the sewer. Traces of his jacket and his hair were found on the victim, including the areas where they really, REALLY shouldn't have been found. His entire mosque agrees : he didn't do it, and even if he did do it, he did nothing wrong, and he's being accused because of racism. The papers reported this small detail once, and now they shut up about any of his relatives or other muslims. Coincidence ?
And... why don't you check how blacks are treated in the rest of the world. Why don't you check how muslims treat blacks ? It's been in the news so much lately in sudan. Also note that muslims have no word for "a black person" only one single word denotes blacks in the muslim word. You know which one ? "slave".
Yes I'm going to tell you that prophet was 1. a pedophile : he fucked a girl called "aisha" when she was 7 year old 2. a person who murdered hundreds of people in cold blood, when they were no threat to him : khaybar, the rounded up all the men there, had them dig their own grave in the center of medina, and had them beheaded before his eyes one by one. Then he ordered muslims to rape their women.
About the pricing inversion, no I don't believe it. Obviously. Even the presence of the bottles would be a clear violation of palestine's law (not beating your wife regularly would be another violation). That's islam. The "religion of peace" ( http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ then why does "islam" mean submission, opression in arabic ?)
Hmmm... okay... his dad is a convicted terrorist, not the guy himself. My bad.
Still, it has apparently been established, or at least upheld, before a civil court, that :
1. Padilla was "closely associated with al Qaeda, an international terrorist organization with which the United States is at war";
2. He had engaged in "war-like acts, including conduct in preparation for acts of international terrorism";
3. He had intelligence that could assist the United States in warding off future terrorist attacks; and
4. He was a continuing threat to American security.
He is not an innocent.
The judicial argument is that, IN SPITE of these established facts, his treatment was unlawful. Court concluded it was not. What exactly is wrong ?
He is a terrorist. Do you have any idea what that word means ? It means he'll kill your children and their entire school because your wife shows her face to your neighbor (and this is, sadly, not a joke). He was planning to do just that. He does not deserve your sympathy. He would not give you, nor your children, nor even other muslims the right of habeas corpus.
Okay, oops, same argument applies to UK. If the government put critisism against the wall, why hasn't he been put against the wall yet, using these unspecified "different ways" ? In fact, why has no-one been put against the wall for critisism for so many years ?
Hell, even the muslim imams trying to overthrow the UK government by advocating mass murder get to keep doing that. Even after 7/7. Even after hundreds of their followers are arrested and convicted.
Wrong on both counts. You can, however, be a hypocrite. Many claim to be muslims who in fact, are not (in fact that's probably 95% of all muslims, just read a saudi blog for example, or notice the idiotic hypocrisy in a palestinian terrorist throwing a molotov cocktail in a BEER BOTTLE to an Israeli soldier). Problem is that they do believe in applying that law.
A muslim recites the basic tenet of islam, which implies following the koran and surah.
Whatever your definition of moderate is, it includes not killing people of other faiths than you are. It presumes you are not a racist (or nazi).
A muslim, by definition follows the rules of the quran, including :
"But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Infidels wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war; but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and pay Zakat, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft- forgiving, Most Merciful." (Surah 9:5)
A single person can obviously not satisfy both definitions, as anyone can logically deduce from these properties. So moderate islam does not exist. islam advocates racist killing, moderation advocates not killing for racism*. This is called an exclusion. You cannot belong to both groups.
There is one name for a "moderate muslim" it is simple : a convert, an apostate.
U.S. citizen... he was arrested for overstaying his visa. How can a U.S. citizen overstay his visa ?
Also the wikipedia article basically states that he is guilty of at least conspiring to sponsoring terrorism. So this guy, whatever he is, is not an innocent. He still has the right to habeas corpus, but make no mistake, this man does not give others (including you) the right to habeas corpus. In fact, he's fighting to take it from you.
If that's true, then claiming that 50.000 $ should not be hard at all. Go for it.
The fact that you claim to know more about islam than thousands of ex-muslims is very telling. Have you ever seen a koran ? Ever read some part of it ?
"9:5, But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Infidels wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem."
Infidel ? that's probably you.
Being a muslim implies that you follow this rule TO THE LETTER (ask any imam), or read online an imam's advice :
And before you say it NO the bible is NOT the same. Compare :
The structure of islamic law run :
1. the sayings and doings of islam's paedophile mass-murdering "prophet" (koran and hadith)
2. islamic law (including killing women on her husband's say-so, beating women, advocating rape in marriages,...)
3. jewish law (I'm not joking about this) including for example the ten commandments, also stoning unfaithful people (though only women, men are to pay a small amount)
4. "inborn morality"
The structure of christian law, including to the new testament :
1. "inborn morality" "do onto others as you would have done onto yourself"
2. jewish law
The structure of jewish law :
1. (in the diaspora) respect the (secular, or even... islamic) local law and belief system (so for example, jews in america should rest on sunday and not on sabbath, unless specifically allowed in the american legal system)
2. jewish law
So being a muslim, by definition, means you advocate killing any and all non-muslims. If you do not advocate this, you violate sharia, and, by definition, cease to be a muslim. You want to know what's scary ?
Slashdot Mirror
Why not ? Let people decide for themselves.
This is the basis for a working democracy.
I get the impression it's quite the reverse. At least here it is.
The people who are afraid of overly performing students (there are a lot of them actually) are not the police, or national security or any such people but :
1) the teachers (most are a) quite dumb b) don't like to be challenged when they screw up a theory c) don't really know the subject)
2) fellow students (we've all watched the "nerd" movies)
Is for technically skilled people to have more children. Companies must embrace women and pregnancy, with daycare and . Only Darwin can help us here. They are the only way to increase the force of people capable and willing to be the next generation.
His kids could takeover anytime now, no ?
No ... damn those governments that :
? storyid=9243
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php
Letting them have military influence is beyond stupid.
Iran's intentions ARE clear by choice. They built a heavy-water reactor and deuterium and tritium handling facilities. These are ONLY useful for a bomb.
You DO remember that movies belong in the "fiction" department, right ? To say the very least ... it's not very easy. Definitely not to actually change a fingerprint.
First, it's not very easy to do it now, second an additional test that would easily defeat any approach like this would be a liveness test for the tissue on the scanner. Good luck emulating that.
Also the passport would be useless to anyone else in case of theft.
That would enable very cheap readers to authenticate passports and holders, and no option to fake it.
Even if people were to succeed in faking it, a criminal (let's not go down the terrorist route for once) wouldn't be able to erase his old identity from the books without deep inside help, which would probably be noticed by too many people.
They're sending a RANDOM signal back in time.
Thank you for providing such a detailed and well reasoned answer.
However I don't fully agree with you. Ask any priest, any bible scholar, or an expert in canon law what takes precedence : the principle of forgiveness and equality of treatment, regardless of crimes that Jezus preached or the laws from the old testament. The answer will be very clear.
Sorry but too many idiots just hit search or go to some muslim hate site and only then start critisizing the bible.
So ? Have you actually read the bible, instead of just hitting "search" or looking up what some muslim sites say about it ?
The new testament (as in the actions of God's son himself) clearly show how to deal with those "laws". Moderate christians follow the principles of the bible just as hard as other christians.
muslims imitate their pedophile (aisha) mass-murdering (khaybar, amongst others) "prophet". That is the highest islamic value. Killing innocent infidels and raping their wives and children. That is what the "prophet" did. That is what they do.
If this is not true, feel free to claim this 50 grand : http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm
Where does the bible pretend to be the literal word of god ?
... since 9/11 there have been 6521 attacks on innocents by muslims, averaging 30 dead per attack. In fact muslims killed more infidels (and other muslims) since 9/11 than even the lancet's estimates of casualties in iraq
... this money would be trivial to claim :
The guiding principle of christianity is simple :
do onto others as you would have them do onto you.
The guiding principle of islam is also very simple :
do onto others as the pedophile mass-murdering prophet did onto others
http://islam.tc/ask-imam/view.php?q=15522
and then the actual real-life observation
If this is distortion
http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm
This guy has gotten 3 trials already. This guy would have first beheaded the children of you, before killing you. What do you mean "their level". It is a LONG way down till you're at their level
So are you saying those inmates are innocent ? Just because there is a difference, there necessarily is racism involved ? Maybe it simply is true what every statistic keeps repeating : immigrants commit many more crimes than natives. 20 or 30 times more. This is statistic is not isolated to america. Les than 30% of people in the belgian prisons are belgians. 4% of muslims in the UK perpetrate 72% of reported antisemitic attacks.
w s/news.html?in_article_id=412697&in_page_id=1770
f change.net/pics/2006/r3443127481_o.jpg&usg=__G3_28 -sYXxU2Lu5snXpe9BxqMsc=
... why don't you check how blacks are treated in the rest of the world. Why don't you check how muslims treat blacks ? It's been in the news so much lately in sudan. Also note that muslims have no word for "a black person" only one single word denotes blacks in the muslim word. You know which one ? "slave".
... check your facts.
islam teaches muslims to kill infidel males, and rape infidel females. The statistic on rapes in brussels, unfortunately, confirms this is exactly what's happening. There are maybe 5% muslims, but they do nearly 60% of rapes. That's racism right there for you. Also note that in many muslim countries, it is either explicitly or de-facto legal to do so.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/ne
Or look at the case of ait oud. He's a muslim who raped and killed 2 children. Then he dumped them in the sewer. Traces of his jacket and his hair were found on the victim, including the areas where they really, REALLY shouldn't have been found. His entire mosque agrees : he didn't do it, and even if he did do it, he did nothing wrong, and he's being accused because of racism. The papers reported this small detail once, and now they shut up about any of his relatives or other muslims. Coincidence ?
http://images.google.be/url?q=http://watch.windso
And
But as always
Yes I'm going to tell you that prophet was
... well that will be an easy 50 grand for you : http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm
1. a pedophile : he fucked a girl called "aisha" when she was 7 year old
2. a person who murdered hundreds of people in cold blood, when they were no threat to him : khaybar, the rounded up all the men there, had them dig their own grave in the center of medina, and had them beheaded before his eyes one by one. Then he ordered muslims to rape their women.
Why don't you start by checking if these facts are true. If they're not
About the pricing inversion, no I don't believe it. Obviously. Even the presence of the bottles would be a clear violation of palestine's law (not beating your wife regularly would be another violation). That's islam. The "religion of peace" ( http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ then why does "islam" mean submission, opression in arabic ?)
Glad you know what terrorism does to a society. Please take that into account.
Oh and the court did found those 4 "little details" proven. They agreed to his detention, which means they followed the administration in this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Padilla_(al leged_terrorist)
... okay ... his dad is a convicted terrorist, not the guy himself. My bad.
Hmmm
Still, it has apparently been established, or at least upheld, before a civil court, that :
1. Padilla was "closely associated with al Qaeda, an international terrorist organization with which the United States is at war";
2. He had engaged in "war-like acts, including conduct in preparation for acts of international terrorism";
3. He had intelligence that could assist the United States in warding off future terrorist attacks; and
4. He was a continuing threat to American security.
He is not an innocent.
The judicial argument is that, IN SPITE of these established facts, his treatment was unlawful. Court concluded it was not. What exactly is wrong ?
He is a terrorist. Do you have any idea what that word means ? It means he'll kill your children and their entire school because your wife shows her face to your neighbor (and this is, sadly, not a joke). He was planning to do just that. He does not deserve your sympathy. He would not give you, nor your children, nor even other muslims the right of habeas corpus.
Okay, oops, same argument applies to UK. If the government put critisism against the wall, why hasn't he been put against the wall yet, using these unspecified "different ways" ? In fact, why has no-one been put against the wall for critisism for so many years ?
/ 07/07/july7_kurt_mosque_feature.shtml
Hell, even the muslim imams trying to overthrow the UK government by advocating mass murder get to keep doing that. Even after 7/7. Even after hundreds of their followers are arrested and convicted.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/content/articles/2006
You know how I know america has a good governmental system ? You said that, and you're still alive, in fact, no one thinks you did anything wrong.
h tm
As opposed to lots of others who try to say stuff like that about their government, and, well just look around :
http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/04/04/iran10415.
Wrong on both counts. You can, however, be a hypocrite. Many claim to be muslims who in fact, are not (in fact that's probably 95% of all muslims, just read a saudi blog for example, or notice the idiotic hypocrisy in a palestinian terrorist throwing a molotov cocktail in a BEER BOTTLE to an Israeli soldier). Problem is that they do believe in applying that law.
5 0910.htm
A muslim recites the basic tenet of islam, which implies following the koran and surah.
And then you have these muslims :
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Testimonials/Sunshine
And there's tons of them.
Not just a myth. It doesn't exist by definition.
Whatever your definition of moderate is, it includes not killing people of other faiths than you are. It presumes you are not a racist (or nazi).
A muslim, by definition follows the rules of the quran, including :
"But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Infidels wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war; but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and pay Zakat, then open the way for them: for Allah is Oft- forgiving, Most Merciful." (Surah 9:5)
A single person can obviously not satisfy both definitions, as anyone can logically deduce from these properties. So moderate islam does not exist. islam advocates racist killing, moderation advocates not killing for racism*. This is called an exclusion. You cannot belong to both groups.
There is one name for a "moderate muslim" it is simple : a convert, an apostate.
Read this :
http://islam.tc/ask-imam/view.php?q=15522
* if you define racism as including religion, as nearly every judicial definition does.
1st question upon reading the text :
... he was arrested for overstaying his visa. How can a U.S. citizen overstay his visa ?
U.S. citizen
Also the wikipedia article basically states that he is guilty of at least conspiring to sponsoring terrorism. So this guy, whatever he is, is not an innocent. He still has the right to habeas corpus, but make no mistake, this man does not give others (including you) the right to habeas corpus. In fact, he's fighting to take it from you.
Okay. Show me one example.
If that's true, then claiming that 50.000 $ should not be hard at all. Go for it.
...)
... islamic) local law and belief system (so for example, jews in america should rest on sunday and not on sabbath, unless specifically allowed in the american legal system)
The fact that you claim to know more about islam than thousands of ex-muslims is very telling. Have you ever seen a koran ? Ever read some part of it ?
"9:5, But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Infidels wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem."
Infidel ? that's probably you.
Being a muslim implies that you follow this rule TO THE LETTER (ask any imam), or read online an imam's advice :
http://islam.tc/ask-imam/view.php?q=15522
And before you say it NO the bible is NOT the same. Compare :
The structure of islamic law run :
1. the sayings and doings of islam's paedophile mass-murdering "prophet" (koran and hadith)
2. islamic law (including killing women on her husband's say-so, beating women, advocating rape in marriages,
3. jewish law (I'm not joking about this) including for example the ten commandments, also stoning unfaithful people (though only women, men are to pay a small amount)
4. "inborn morality"
The structure of christian law, including to the new testament :
1. "inborn morality" "do onto others as you would have done onto yourself"
2. jewish law
The structure of jewish law :
1. (in the diaspora) respect the (secular, or even
2. jewish law
So being a muslim, by definition, means you advocate killing any and all non-muslims. If you do not advocate this, you violate sharia, and, by definition, cease to be a muslim. You want to know what's scary ?
http://islam.tc/ask-imam/view.php?q=15522