Do not get your head out of the sand. Go there and do something about it. Talk is cheap. Accusing others of not talking is even cheaper.
Go down there and start an IT school. Should be doable. These people have all the time in the world, and a LOT of willpower, due to their situation. They will beat a lot of lazy slobs work in way to high places after only a few months of trained.
Maybe just buy 5 books on various subjects and give them some. "Becoming an electrician", "Starting out in auto repair", hell even that old "VB for dummies" you no doubt have lying around somewhere. That may accomplish more than you think possible. And maybe some reading books too.
Obviously it's not. But these guys will be called to account, and will be dealt with. As is normal in the US. I'm very certain they will no longer be wearing a badge on the streets next week.
The egyptians in those videos will be killing people on the streets tomorrow, as will the palestinians, the afghans, the pakistanis, the saudi's.
Therefore these cops in the U.S. are not that big a problem, while the ones in those muslim countries are a huge problem.
Is it that hard for you to fathom ? You're spewing non-sense.
In order to get into guantanamo you have to meet 2 conditions : 1) you need to get caught fighting american troups abroad 2) in a country that is not your own
If this doesn't prove that these people are seriously fucked up, then nothing will.
As you say yourself the comparison is not at all fair, it's also irrelevant.
If what you say is completely true, it will still accomplish the task of showing what will happen to those followers if they decide to immitate his example.
That the left is opposed to democracy. The democratically elected government introduced the death penalty, and now it should not be carried out...
No it will not bring back the dead, but it WILL do 2 things : -> declare once and for all, and for everyone to see that killing is not allowed, which is a good thing -> prevent anyone from helping him (kill even more), which is a good thing -> prevent him from doing any further damage, which is a good thing -> bring this criminal's death during a last display of public humiliation, where everybody is reminded that he was a murderer, which is a VERY good thing -> kill this animal just as he killed his thousands of victims, which is a good thing
No, revenge is bad. But this is not revenge. This is a public, and final statement that nobody gets to kill.
What the hell is "gold digging" and what is the problem with it ?
In the second case, that might have happened anyway (in fact in regularly does), and this will speed up the process. Especially for people with a "suspicious" look this would be a boon.
You do not have privacy in public places. You won't EVER get it (for very obvious reasons, that's why those places are called "public"). You are not blurred out now either.
I do not have privacy from the cameras that are your eyes ! I do not have privacy from your eyes. I want you operated to blur out my appearance in your eyes to restore my privacy !
1) it's cameras in public places. When did you ever HAVE privacy in public places ? Anyone is fully within his rights to spy on others in public places, so the police is too 2) the computer will simply notify human operators, who will then decide wether to send in force or not 3) the camera images will provide a record of what happened, so that police brutality will be self-evident from the imagery, and thus, decrease 4) it's not the terminator that's coming for you. It's human beings that are paid to help you
Will some idiot police officer maybe be watching you kiss your girlfriend ? Yes, maybe.
Is there any reason why any idiot can not already watch you kiss your girlfirend ? No
Will it save lives and help identify the real perpetrators after the fact ? Yes, definitely.
And those people who created it were seriously big believers in the western culture. Do you really think, if it would have been developed in china, that any-to-any communication would have been implemented ?
Ah the idiots' party... that figures... I had pegged you more for an S-PA "we just take over other parties' agendas" voter.
(for those of you in america : S-PA is the pro-religion anti-government influence "socialist" party that's currently in power, and before you ask, no they don't see any problem with those viewpoints in a socialist party)
- if you happen to be offended by it "polar red", just think it was "sarcasm"
1) who is Laurette onckelinkx' ex-husband ? Where is he working ? What has he done ? Look it up. 2) a) brussels : 1 violent death per 10.000 inhabitants per year
b) new york : 1 violent death per 25.000 inhabitants per year
I completely agree that a person's environment is very important. For example, showing that criminals are punished is VERY important, to convince people you cannot profit from criminal actions (obviously). This climate has not been there in Belgium for a very long time. I find it has created flaws even in my own character. Belgium is slowly devolving in a lawless state, and, frankly, I REALLY don't like it, for a very very very clear example, look up the answer to question 1.
Slashdot Mirror
Do not get your head out of the sand. Go there and do something about it. Talk is cheap. Accusing others of not talking is even cheaper.
Go down there and start an IT school. Should be doable. These people have all the time in the world, and a LOT of willpower, due to their situation. They will beat a lot of lazy slobs work in way to high places after only a few months of trained.
Maybe just buy 5 books on various subjects and give them some. "Becoming an electrician", "Starting out in auto repair", hell even that old "VB for dummies" you no doubt have lying around somewhere. That may accomplish more than you think possible. And maybe some reading books too.
Glad you included that last one.
Keep in mind that proof, or even a strong indication that an officer committed any of the first 3 will get him fired and off the streets.
Obviously it's not. But these guys will be called to account, and will be dealt with. As is normal in the US. I'm very certain they will no longer be wearing a badge on the streets next week.
The egyptians in those videos will be killing people on the streets tomorrow, as will the palestinians, the afghans, the pakistanis, the saudi's.
Therefore these cops in the U.S. are not that big a problem, while the ones in those muslim countries are a huge problem.
Is it that hard for you to fathom ? You're spewing non-sense.
h p?album=7
In order to get into guantanamo you have to meet 2 conditions :
1) you need to get caught fighting american troups abroad
2) in a country that is not your own
If this doesn't prove that these people are seriously fucked up, then nothing will.
Look at what they do in those countries to people who MIGHT be guilty, without trial :
http://www.nakedterror.net/galleries/thumbnails.p
These people want to do the same in the US.
Perhaps you're feeling more into alternative forms of government that some people are trying to impose upon you ?
h p?album=7
How about islamic government, what the terrorists are demanding ? What 87% of the british muslims are demanding ?
http://www.nakedterror.net/galleries/thumbnails.p
You like it yet ?
In Egypt, a muslim country, police brutality is government policy, not some idiot running out of line, like it is in the US.
x ual-assault-in-downtown-cairo.html
i _Arabia
And Egypt is the second most moderate muslim country there is.
Read how the police responds in a moderate muslim country :
http://forsoothsayer.blogspot.com/2006/10/mass-se
Read how the police responds in a reasonably muslim country :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Saud
Do I really need to provide a link to what happens in a really muslim country, like palestine or afghanistan or pakistan ? Do you want to see ?
Why does this happen ? Here's one opinion :
http://www.faithfreedom.org/challenge.htm
*ahem* he killed shiites to please sunni's
w osadd064963621nov06,0,142696.story?coll=ny-worldne ws-print
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/world/ny-
so obviously, he does
Not by being lowered feet-first into a wood-chipper.
Not by inhaling mustard gas.
Not by being raped repeatedly in front of his family and then having his throat cut.
Not by being stabbed, shot, and having his genitals cut off and put in his mouth.
Not even by being machine-gunned from a helicopter and then bulldozed into a mass grave.
No, Saddam will simply be hanged by the neck until dead.
www.seconddraft.org/movies.php
A muslim dictator should be tried in a civil court sponsored by wahhabist muslims ? You're kidding, right ? Dear god I hope you're kidding.
Perhaps you just didn't know that. Look up wahhabism while you're at it (hint : they sponsor terrorism as a state policy)
Because leaving him alive will cause more deaths.
For example, left alive Saddam will use his lawyer to send messages/orders to his followers to start killing or to free him.
As you say yourself the comparison is not at all fair, it's also irrelevant.
If what you say is completely true, it will still accomplish the task of showing what will happen to those followers if they decide to immitate his example.
Do I really need to illustrate this ? One very idiotic example is this :
http://www.prisonerlife.com/deathrow/deathrow16.c
But other stuff is also true.
Does it matter ?
Obviously both parties try to spin the news in their favor. Not just the republicans.
It gets worse. The dems are not opposed to finishing the war in iraq, they just want an election victory.
That the left is opposed to democracy. The democratically elected government introduced the death penalty, and now it should not be carried out ...
No it will not bring back the dead, but it WILL do 2 things :
-> declare once and for all, and for everyone to see that killing is not allowed, which is a good thing
-> prevent anyone from helping him (kill even more), which is a good thing
-> prevent him from doing any further damage, which is a good thing
-> bring this criminal's death during a last display of public humiliation, where everybody is reminded that he was a murderer, which is a VERY good thing
-> kill this animal just as he killed his thousands of victims, which is a good thing
No, revenge is bad. But this is not revenge. This is a public, and final statement that nobody gets to kill.
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance"
Oh really ?
o n-of-media.html
...
http://www.zombietime.com/reuters_photo_fraud/
http://eureferendum.blogspot.com/2006/08/corrupti
Please explain how these 2 things never made it into the debate
You should check out arab textbooks.
http://www.pmw.org.il/schoolbooks.html
And then decide who is worse.
What the hell is "gold digging" and what is the problem with it ?
In the second case, that might have happened anyway (in fact in regularly does), and this will speed up the process. Especially for people with a "suspicious" look this would be a boon.
You do not have privacy in public places. You won't EVER get it (for very obvious reasons, that's why those places are called "public"). You are not blurred out now either.
I do not have privacy from the cameras that are your eyes ! I do not have privacy from your eyes. I want you operated to blur out my appearance in your eyes to restore my privacy !
1) it's cameras in public places. When did you ever HAVE privacy in public places ? Anyone is fully within his rights to spy on others in public places, so the police is too
2) the computer will simply notify human operators, who will then decide wether to send in force or not
3) the camera images will provide a record of what happened, so that police brutality will be self-evident from the imagery, and thus, decrease
4) it's not the terminator that's coming for you. It's human beings that are paid to help you
Will some idiot police officer maybe be watching you kiss your girlfriend ? Yes, maybe.
Is there any reason why any idiot can not already watch you kiss your girlfirend ? No
Will it save lives and help identify the real perpetrators after the fact ? Yes, definitely.
Why is this such a bad thing ?
And those people who created it were seriously big believers in the western culture. Do you really think, if it would have been developed in china, that any-to-any communication would have been implemented ?
Ah the idiots' party ... that figures ... I had pegged you more for an S-PA "we just take over other parties' agendas" voter.
(for those of you in america : S-PA is the pro-religion anti-government influence "socialist" party that's currently in power, and before you ask, no they don't see any problem with those viewpoints in a socialist party)
- if you happen to be offended by it "polar red", just think it was "sarcasm"
You comment - let me quote -
... what party are you for ? Because I'm fearing more for the Flemsish democracy.
"We don't want your kinf here"
Makes me wonder
I actually missed your comment "happy to see your kind go away"
In a minute you're gonna tell me you're a "tolerant" individual, right ? Obviously you have some introspection to do.
I'll take your poisoned comments :
1) who is Laurette onckelinkx' ex-husband ? Where is he working ? What has he done ? Look it up.
2) a) brussels : 1 violent death per 10.000 inhabitants per year
b) new york : 1 violent death per 25.000 inhabitants per year
I completely agree that a person's environment is very important. For example, showing that criminals are punished is VERY important, to convince people you cannot profit from criminal actions (obviously). This climate has not been there in Belgium for a very long time. I find it has created flaws even in my own character. Belgium is slowly devolving in a lawless state, and, frankly, I REALLY don't like it, for a very very very clear example, look up the answer to question 1.
First ... this is an english forum, so be tolerant and use english
... make a visit to Leuven Centraal before you say idiot statements like this. You haven't, or you wouldn't be making these statements.
Second