I know a bunch of liberals who were upset that the 1000 year part was a thinly veiled reference to the Third Reich, again, missing the point entirely...
No it wasn't. It was a reference to something a liberal said about being in power for ending segregation.
No, obviously you don't understand what America is about.
America is about having the freedom for both of you retards to type furiously at eachother until you have blisters on your fingers or someone smashes their computer in a fit of autism-fueled rage without it evolving to lynch mobs and pitchforks.
Seriously, fuck it. Hopefully ISPs will start charging advertisers (the only people with money to actually pay the extra charges) so people stop putting 20 fucking external domain references in the simplest of pages through the more mainstream ones, causing page load times to border on 10 seconds simply because the browser is looking up all the damned DNS entries and external resources. Hell, apply a $100 fee per KB on external domain traffic and the internet might finally be as fast as it was before Obama took office again.
Pyramids are things like multi-level scams where an individual only profits when they recruit many others, who each in turn have to recruit many others.
That's literally what Bitcoin is if you add in some sporadic pump and dump campaigns.
It might be more useful in the realm of folding. Folding is a much more complex operation and tends to need more RAM, more cores being useful as well, and fast throughput on the bus. The big issue with mining cards when applied to folding is that you can't get a motherboard supporting more than 4, maybe 6 PCIe 8x-16x bus lines then you need a CPU core for each card on top of it. If you can pack 2 GPUs worth of power into a single card suddenly you have double the capacity (or rather, nearly on part with the 12 GPUs you can pack into a mining machine with PCIe 1x buses.)
Boeing is just "baiting" Musk to spend a lot of time and money on Mars because they - and the rest of the United Space Alliance - are feeling the hurt of all SpaceX's recent successful satellite launches.
That makes zero sense. Musk hasn't spent a dime on anything space related, all of his companies come from government handouts, he's simply redirected government funds to certain projects (sometimes after suing them for said funds) and he thumbed his nose at Trump so he's not getting more handouts.
At least until Google, Microsoft, Apple, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, etc stop brainwashing the kids. Homeschooling is an infinitely better option and you owe it to your child, at a minimum, for having created him.
Spread a few million dollars worth of Iron Oxide in the South Pacific and it will generate a new ice age, use less than a few million dollars worth of Iron Oxide and get a nice cool climate. Shit isn't rocket science, embrace your Humanity: the first step is to stop bitching and moaning; the second step is to do something useful. Regulating vast industries and enacting idiotic bans is not progress, it is anti-progress under the guise of "saving the planet" when we have well proven and much cheaper methods to not only reverse any warming, but to outright cool shit down so we can burn more coal if we want to. Stop being a bunch of reactionary retards lead around by globalist control freaks with financial skin in the game using you to quell their competition and gain dominance, this is not a complex problem.
Are you just a troll or what's the deal? You're claiming to have knowledge you clearly don't, the only plausible possibilities are troll of Google marketing shill and frankly I think Google could do better.
Aside from the fact every comment you make is an attack lacking substance, I didn't suggest NN's were fuzzy concepts, I suggested arguing the difference between a NN and a genetic algorithm with you was too much in the realm of fuzzy logic to get through, because you clearly don't understand the difference. As someone who has been studying and working with these constructs for over a decade and a half professionally it would be like you attempting to explain how to use rhetoric and ad hominems to "win" internet arguments to a tapeworm - it simple won't sink in. That said AI means a very specific thing, that thing is not what Google is marketing it as, it is AT A MINIMUM an IQ of 100 and the ability to create new things, not to assemble known constructs in new ways but to invent. AI means just that artificial INTELLIGENCE, if it doesn't meet even an average level of sentience by the measures we would apply to ourselves it is not AI and no amount of marketing dribble can change that.
The statement a NN is involved is extremely liberal given it's just some genetic algorithms, but conceding that because it's too far in the fuzzy logic realm to argue: neural nets are not necessarily AI. We don't yet have AI, we don't yet even have the computing power produced, if it were all in one datacenter and networked together flawlessly, to create even 1 AI.
Granted, in the USA the concern is perhaps that people or the government might not actually be able to really determine fairly and objectively what is evil and what is good in speech. That hence one should just allow all of it.
In the US the stance (among people with at least half a brain) is that all speech is free speech, the laws apply especially for things you personally detest. It is meant to give the most hated minorities of society the chance to get their ideas out, the good bits to grow and the bad bits to be reasoned out instead of festering until the people holding those ideas snap. All governments want to remove free speech, all major corporations want to control free speech and argue it is within their right to do so (nevermind their existence is predicated on the government saying they are entities and the government doesn't have that right, yet they have somehow been granted such a right which is illegal for the government to grant.) In the short term free speech can cause a bit of chaos, in the long term free speech increases stability by a huge factor, politicians, shareholders, and bureaucrats only think in the short term and hence they mostly despise free speech and will latch on to whichever jackass has the most revolting opinion of the day to call for banning it.
A NN is not necessarily AI. If all it can do is recognize images it's not even remotely close to AI, at best it's a heuristic algorithm. There's a huge difference. We don't even have enough computing power on Earth to make a Human-level AI with known ANN topologies today, thus anything claiming to be a working form of AI is 100% pure marketing dribble.
For someone claiming to be against things lacking substance combined with personal attacks that seems to be all you have. Why do you hate yourself so much?
You're wrong, and clearly didn't even read their summary - they specifically mention how this new approach (using a neural net to design neural nets) is performing better than previous attempts using evolutionary algorithms.
What they described was in no way shape or form a "neural net," but a very rudimentary genetic algorithm coupled with some parameters on image recognition software. This is marking hype and nothing more.
This is image recognition + genetic algorithms, though given Google is a marketing company and not a computer company it makes sense they would market that as AI. Too bad they fired all the competent developers.
Slashdot Mirror
What the name of the motherboard with 8 PCIe 8x or higher slots?
You seem to have strong opinions for someone defending something so fundamentally dumb.
I know a bunch of liberals who were upset that the 1000 year part was a thinly veiled reference to the Third Reich, again, missing the point entirely...
No it wasn't. It was a reference to something a liberal said about being in power for ending segregation.
No, obviously you don't understand what America is about.
America is about having the freedom for both of you retards to type furiously at eachother until you have blisters on your fingers or someone smashes their computer in a fit of autism-fueled rage without it evolving to lynch mobs and pitchforks.
Seriously, fuck it. Hopefully ISPs will start charging advertisers (the only people with money to actually pay the extra charges) so people stop putting 20 fucking external domain references in the simplest of pages through the more mainstream ones, causing page load times to border on 10 seconds simply because the browser is looking up all the damned DNS entries and external resources. Hell, apply a $100 fee per KB on external domain traffic and the internet might finally be as fast as it was before Obama took office again.
Pyramids are things like multi-level scams where an individual only profits when they recruit many others, who each in turn have to recruit many others.
That's literally what Bitcoin is if you add in some sporadic pump and dump campaigns.
Which one of you can write C or C++ anymore?
I do, but I choose to work on legacy VB6 instead. Also, driver optimizations should be done with assembly.
It might be more useful in the realm of folding. Folding is a much more complex operation and tends to need more RAM, more cores being useful as well, and fast throughput on the bus. The big issue with mining cards when applied to folding is that you can't get a motherboard supporting more than 4, maybe 6 PCIe 8x-16x bus lines then you need a CPU core for each card on top of it. If you can pack 2 GPUs worth of power into a single card suddenly you have double the capacity (or rather, nearly on part with the 12 GPUs you can pack into a mining machine with PCIe 1x buses.)
Boeing is just "baiting" Musk to spend a lot of time and money on Mars because they - and the rest of the United Space Alliance - are feeling the hurt of all SpaceX's recent successful satellite launches.
That makes zero sense. Musk hasn't spent a dime on anything space related, all of his companies come from government handouts, he's simply redirected government funds to certain projects (sometimes after suing them for said funds) and he thumbed his nose at Trump so he's not getting more handouts.
Whichever (or both) makes you think you can restrict access to beer.
At least until Google, Microsoft, Apple, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, etc stop brainwashing the kids. Homeschooling is an infinitely better option and you owe it to your child, at a minimum, for having created him.
I'm a troll. Sure. I'm an awful human being. OK. I am actually feeling sort of mean today.
Trolls aren't awful, they're usually just lonely from all the cultural Marxism and rapid feminism leading to ostracization.
Spread a few million dollars worth of Iron Oxide in the South Pacific and it will generate a new ice age, use less than a few million dollars worth of Iron Oxide and get a nice cool climate. Shit isn't rocket science, embrace your Humanity: the first step is to stop bitching and moaning; the second step is to do something useful. Regulating vast industries and enacting idiotic bans is not progress, it is anti-progress under the guise of "saving the planet" when we have well proven and much cheaper methods to not only reverse any warming, but to outright cool shit down so we can burn more coal if we want to. Stop being a bunch of reactionary retards lead around by globalist control freaks with financial skin in the game using you to quell their competition and gain dominance, this is not a complex problem.
Are you just a troll or what's the deal? You're claiming to have knowledge you clearly don't, the only plausible possibilities are troll of Google marketing shill and frankly I think Google could do better.
Beer is just an obsolete form of water purification.
Neither you nor the government get to make that call.
Aside from the fact every comment you make is an attack lacking substance, I didn't suggest NN's were fuzzy concepts, I suggested arguing the difference between a NN and a genetic algorithm with you was too much in the realm of fuzzy logic to get through, because you clearly don't understand the difference. As someone who has been studying and working with these constructs for over a decade and a half professionally it would be like you attempting to explain how to use rhetoric and ad hominems to "win" internet arguments to a tapeworm - it simple won't sink in. That said AI means a very specific thing, that thing is not what Google is marketing it as, it is AT A MINIMUM an IQ of 100 and the ability to create new things, not to assemble known constructs in new ways but to invent. AI means just that artificial INTELLIGENCE, if it doesn't meet even an average level of sentience by the measures we would apply to ourselves it is not AI and no amount of marketing dribble can change that.
The statement a NN is involved is extremely liberal given it's just some genetic algorithms, but conceding that because it's too far in the fuzzy logic realm to argue: neural nets are not necessarily AI. We don't yet have AI, we don't yet even have the computing power produced, if it were all in one datacenter and networked together flawlessly, to create even 1 AI.
Granted, in the USA the concern is perhaps that people or the government might not actually be able to really determine fairly and objectively what is evil and what is good in speech. That hence one should just allow all of it.
In the US the stance (among people with at least half a brain) is that all speech is free speech, the laws apply especially for things you personally detest. It is meant to give the most hated minorities of society the chance to get their ideas out, the good bits to grow and the bad bits to be reasoned out instead of festering until the people holding those ideas snap. All governments want to remove free speech, all major corporations want to control free speech and argue it is within their right to do so (nevermind their existence is predicated on the government saying they are entities and the government doesn't have that right, yet they have somehow been granted such a right which is illegal for the government to grant.) In the short term free speech can cause a bit of chaos, in the long term free speech increases stability by a huge factor, politicians, shareholders, and bureaucrats only think in the short term and hence they mostly despise free speech and will latch on to whichever jackass has the most revolting opinion of the day to call for banning it.
A NN is not necessarily AI. If all it can do is recognize images it's not even remotely close to AI, at best it's a heuristic algorithm. There's a huge difference. We don't even have enough computing power on Earth to make a Human-level AI with known ANN topologies today, thus anything claiming to be a working form of AI is 100% pure marketing dribble.
For someone claiming to be against things lacking substance combined with personal attacks that seems to be all you have. Why do you hate yourself so much?
There was no legitimate content to respond to, hence why my opinion as a computer security expert is infinitely more valuable.
You're wrong, and clearly didn't even read their summary - they specifically mention how this new approach (using a neural net to design neural nets) is performing better than previous attempts using evolutionary algorithms.
What they described was in no way shape or form a "neural net," but a very rudimentary genetic algorithm coupled with some parameters on image recognition software. This is marking hype and nothing more.
Nobody fucking cares. I sure as hell don't care what you have to say. And I promise you that no one else does, either.
I did, and I enjoy that that in itself makes you wrong, Google shill.
So you're conceding your second point from the original post then? Or did you just forget you said "Neither does anyone?"
This is image recognition + genetic algorithms, though given Google is a marketing company and not a computer company it makes sense they would market that as AI. Too bad they fired all the competent developers.