How about your 'mega-neck' giraffes now?
It's New Zealand, do these 'giraffes' are actually giraffe, or another pouch-thingy marsupial behave-alike-giraffe?
One more comment form Dr. Neal Krawetz of fotoforensics.com, which software was used by Bellingcats to do their "research":
https://twitter.com/hackerfact...
"distances itself"? Understatement. I had nothing to do with their faulty analysis.
Only idiot cowards show their fear of truth by down voted!
Bellingcat - Eliot Higgins, who "famous" for "exposed" crime of Assad regime, over chemical attack. If you lazy enough for not searching Google: http://www.mintpressnews.com/t...
You are correct!
I posted a point-to-point replying to allcoolnameswheretak (Score 4: Bullshit).
http://slashdot.org/comments.p...
Without any counter approach, trolls try to vote down my post, and the parent post of allcoolnameswheretak now be (Score 5: More Bullshit).
At first, I did not intent to post here (because of moderation system of Slashdot, which is not for discussion like forum, when new post will be hidden, I am a long time reader, but don't have an account).
But I decide to post for someone like to hear different voices.
But, when Russia stated that they don't have any BUK-M1, which they abandoned. Ukraine shifted to new theory, separatist captured BUK from army.
Western media shifted the story also.
** Separatists and Russian solders shot down the plane (because, this complex system, only Russian can operate this).
** Russians have technology, have experience, they could not be mistaken a civilian plane with military one. The drunk soldiers seem not convinced. http://www.theguardian.com/wor...
US says ‘no evidence of Russia’s direct involvement’
** Russian provided BUK-M1... then captured BUK from Ukraine army. There is also BUK driver "released" from separatists confirmed that (Where is he now??).
U.S. intelligence agencies have so far been unable to determine the nationalities or identities of the crew that launched the missile. U.S. officials said it was possible the SA-11 was launched by a defector from the Ukrainian military who was trained to use similar missile systems.
The last photo was **DELETED** (silently).
The first photo, is interesting too.
This is the first, and **ONLY** photo which captured the smoke-trail of missile, provided by a pro-Kiev "witness", here some analysis from Dutch blogger (he may be hired by Kremlin, but his logic is interesting): http://7mei.nl/2015/05/18/mh17...
Here some fact:
* This is the **ONLY** photo about smoke-trail, despite several video from locals capture the moment of the planed burning.
* The photo was in BMP, no EXIF data (Bellingcats to "protect" the "witness", yes here have contact with pro-Kiev medias, blogger, too)
* His interviews contradicted themselves.
* Minor detail, the blogger of 7meil.nl wen to the room of "witness", taken a photo as "witness" described, and there is (electric) wires in photo, not like the "original" photo.
4. After the incident, locals, in some videos, cheering because they thought government airplane shot down. May be, the separatists think so, too.
5. Which satellite images!?
IF satellite images provided by Russian Government after the accident, there not claim that is fake (yet).
Meanwhile, the satellite images provided by Ukraine Government, to counter the Russian ones, was analyzed by Russians, that was faked
Slashdot Mirror
How about your 'mega-neck' giraffes now?
It's New Zealand, do these 'giraffes' are actually giraffe, or another pouch-thingy marsupial behave-alike-giraffe?
"distances itself"? Understatement. I had nothing to do with their faulty analysis.
Only idiot cowards show their fear of truth by down voted!
http://www.mintpressnews.com/t...
The Bellingcat "research" on "fake" sat images released by Russian Gov. which they used http://fotoforensics.com/ software:
Dr. Neal Krawetz, of fotoforensics.com, commented on Twitter: https://twitter.com/WeBaGeMygh...
He, finally conclude,
Yeah... chalk this up as a "how to not do image analysis".
Wait for troll to vote down this!
...And it deserved voted (Score 5: BS).
Here in English:
'Bellingcat Report Doesn't Prove Anything': Expert Criticizes Allegations of Russian MH17 Manipulation http://www.spiegel.de/internat...
Well all the points of the post above is BULLSHIT!
You are correct! I posted a point-to-point replying to allcoolnameswheretak (Score 4: Bullshit). http://slashdot.org/comments.p... Without any counter approach, trolls try to vote down my post, and the parent post of allcoolnameswheretak now be (Score 5: More Bullshit).
Some cowards vote down my reply, and then vote up +1 your post!
Yes, without point-to-point replying, vote down this!
Well done! Cowards!
Ah, after some "research" I found out what Bellingcat "analysis" is. :D
Here, you can use google translate:
http://www.spiegel.de/politik/...
That dismiss the "seriousness" of "research" of Bellingcat.
Spiegel is definitely not Kremlin-infected source!
7mei.nl post counter analysis of Charles Wood, a forensic analyst and researcher from Australia:
http://7mei.nl/2015/06/01/abou...
http://7mei.nl/2015/02/02/mh17...
But I decide to post for someone like to hear different voices.
1. Favorite theory was Russia PROVIDED BUK to separatists.
http://thediplomat.com/2014/07...
But, when Russia stated that they don't have any BUK-M1, which they abandoned. Ukraine shifted to new theory, separatist captured BUK from army.
Western media shifted the story also.
** Separatists and Russian solders shot down the plane (because, this complex system, only Russian can operate this).
** Russians have technology, have experience, they could not be mistaken a civilian plane with military one. The drunk soldiers seem not convinced.
http://www.theguardian.com/wor...
US says ‘no evidence of Russia’s direct involvement’
** Russian provided BUK-M1... then captured BUK from Ukraine army. There is also BUK driver "released" from separatists confirmed that (Where is he now??).
** No Russian involvement, so how separatist could launch the BUK. New theory:
http://touch.latimes.com/#sect...
U.S. intelligence agencies have so far been unable to determine the nationalities or identities of the crew that launched the missile. U.S. officials said it was possible the SA-11 was launched by a defector from the Ukrainian military who was trained to use similar missile systems.
Robert Parry confirmed that: https://consortiumnews.com/201...
2+3. Unverifiable. Also, fake photo, provided by SBU (Ukraine security agency), which claimed BUK no.312 launched missile downed the MH-17, is still in Ukraine service:
http://rt.com/news/174868-ukra...
http://web.archive.org/web/201...
http://www.sbu.gov.ua/sbu/cont...
The last photo was **DELETED** (silently).
The first photo, is interesting too.
This is the first, and **ONLY** photo which captured the smoke-trail of missile, provided by a pro-Kiev "witness", here some analysis from Dutch blogger (he may be hired by Kremlin, but his logic is interesting):
http://7mei.nl/2015/05/18/mh17...
Here some fact:
* This is the **ONLY** photo about smoke-trail, despite several video from locals capture the moment of the planed burning.
* The photo was in BMP, no EXIF data (Bellingcats to "protect" the "witness", yes here have contact with pro-Kiev medias, blogger, too)
* His interviews contradicted themselves.
* Minor detail, the blogger of 7meil.nl wen to the room of "witness", taken a photo as "witness" described, and there is (electric) wires in photo, not like the "original" photo.
4. After the incident, locals, in some videos, cheering because they thought government airplane shot down. May be, the separatists think so, too.
5. Which satellite images!?
IF satellite images provided by Russian Government after the accident, there not claim that is fake (yet).
Meanwhile, the satellite images provided by Ukraine Government, to counter the Russian ones, was analyzed by Russians, that was faked