'Tis a little different of course. Using your own DNA in an experiment that does not involve implanting it into someone's uterus is not wrong, merely curious.
First off...Communism is is economic system, not a political one, and therefore cannot be directly compared to democracy, as democracy is a political system. But going even further than that, the nature of Communism would in no way restict the freedoms of peoples, only increase. Read the Communist manifesto if you doubt me.
Lastly, since China oppresses personal liberty and freedom, they cannot, in all conscience, be called a "Communist State."
"Capitalism is the fantastic belief that the nastiest men, for the nastiest reasons, will for the benefit of us all." - Keynes.
Unforunately that senario, at least in effect if not in practice, is becoming more prevalent every day. Big business has a stranglehold on the government, especially with Dumbass Dubya in charge. Unless the American people react, by voting in people from third parties with little corperate sponsors, this cycle of business controlled politics will continue to get worse.
I guess this is what happens when you institute capitalism and expect the people involved to avoid corruption.
"Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men, for the nastiest of reasons, will somehow work for the benefit of us all."
--John Maynard Keynes
Gee, a personal attack becuase you only have one argument. I will admit that the simpsons does have moments that are not funny, and that it does occasionally stray towards the immature; but to state that it is "90% marketing" is a major fallacy. I point you to the simpsons themselves... a satirical view on the average white middle class family. Personally JavaMan, I believe that you have never watched the show before in your entire life, or if you have, you have seen one episode. Before you make mass judgements, know what you are talking about.
I would hardly think that my incorrect spelling of a word is equivalent to a person's inability to see past the slapstick cover of the simpsons.
But of course I am responding to someone who posts spelling corrections so...
ok...I spelled a work incorrectly...I admit that that was careless of me...but there is more than one type of sterotype in a society (economic, political...etc.), so my explanatory comments were valid.
Your derogatory comments about the simpsons and your extolling of X-Files shows your low intelligence and lack of ability. The simpsons is a great micro-chasm of society and accurately shows the social sterotypes in society. If you cannot see this, well then I hope you never reproduce.
Slashdot Mirror
'Tis a little different of course. Using your own DNA in an experiment that does not involve implanting it into someone's uterus is not wrong, merely curious.
First off...Communism is is economic system, not a political one, and therefore cannot be directly compared to democracy, as democracy is a political system. But going even further than that, the nature of Communism would in no way restict the freedoms of peoples, only increase. Read the Communist manifesto if you doubt me. Lastly, since China oppresses personal liberty and freedom, they cannot, in all conscience, be called a "Communist State." "Capitalism is the fantastic belief that the nastiest men, for the nastiest reasons, will for the benefit of us all." - Keynes.
Unforunately that senario, at least in effect if not in practice, is becoming more prevalent every day. Big business has a stranglehold on the government, especially with Dumbass Dubya in charge. Unless the American people react, by voting in people from third parties with little corperate sponsors, this cycle of business controlled politics will continue to get worse. I guess this is what happens when you institute capitalism and expect the people involved to avoid corruption. "Capitalism is the extraordinary belief that the nastiest of men, for the nastiest of reasons, will somehow work for the benefit of us all." --John Maynard Keynes
Gee, a personal attack becuase you only have one argument. I will admit that the simpsons does have moments that are not funny, and that it does occasionally stray towards the immature; but to state that it is "90% marketing" is a major fallacy. I point you to the simpsons themselves... a satirical view on the average white middle class family. Personally JavaMan, I believe that you have never watched the show before in your entire life, or if you have, you have seen one episode. Before you make mass judgements, know what you are talking about.
I would hardly think that my incorrect spelling of a word is equivalent to a person's inability to see past the slapstick cover of the simpsons.
But of course I am responding to someone who posts spelling corrections so...
ok...I spelled a work incorrectly...I admit that that was careless of me...but there is more than one type of sterotype in a society (economic, political...etc.), so my explanatory comments were valid.
Your derogatory comments about the simpsons and your extolling of X-Files shows your low intelligence and lack of ability. The simpsons is a great micro-chasm of society and accurately shows the social sterotypes in society. If you cannot see this, well then I hope you never reproduce.