That happens right now with alarming regularity... at least for patients of the Veterans' Administration medical system. Such pharmacies often buy from different suppliers, and oftentimes the size, shape, and even color of the pill will change over time - you only find out when you open the bottle.
cost would likely be way less than some of what a hospital buys (e.g. a CT machine), and it could pay for itself over time like any other machine - amortization is your friend in that department. Liability is handled as well, since hospitals (and even their in-house pharmacies in particular) often have to insure against potential drug-related liabilities anyway (misdiagnosis, mislabeling, adverse drug interactions, improper storage procedures, etc).
Now *regulations* are gonna be the big hurdle... no idea what the FDA (or non-US equivalents) are going to demand, but if you think about it, there isn't much difference between this technology and what a pharmacy does right now with compounding, save for the 'on a computer' aspect (well, machinery too, but you get the idea).
I think it would be easier to simply take command/control of those bots and start flushing hard drives (or whatever else will ensure it never reboots), then shut it down remotely.
Or, if you don't feel that destructive? Drop a small executable that removes all networking/modem/etc capabilities upon boot, then remotely restart the machine. They keep their cat pictures, and we don't have to deal with it being on the public network.
Yes it's completely unethical, etc... but maybe that's the one thing that will give the botted machine owners the hint that maybe they should take their boxes down to Geek Squad (or wherever) to get fixed?
Unless you can point to or create an objective set of criteria for those "negative externalities" and do so in a way that sets an objective price point for them? It's a nice way of saying that pollution sucks, but way too subjective to actually use fairly. I guarantee that if ever put into statute, it would fast become a club with which to punish political enemies and convenient scapegoats.
Besides, who decides what is "energy intensive"? I'm pretty sure the old folks who rely on motorized gear just to stay out of a nursing home, or a crippled kid who relies on power-hungry medical equipment just to stay alive would object to your assessment, no?
Note that cost has many dimensions here: * taxes * personal cost of having to replace bits and bobs to meet these efficiency standards * increases in the power bill
etc...
It's nice to promise something, but has anyone run the numbers on cost to individuals and to the economy at large?
Fair cop, but consider that the same despots you cite are very active in absconding with any kind of aid that even smells like money. Outside of schools and hospitals (provided mostly by church-based charities, Catholic Relief Services chief among them)? You don't find much other types of aid reaching Africa, mostly because that shiz gets swiped by every corrupt pair of hands that can reach a piece of it.
So, unless you recommend that we re-establish colonial rule, or simply sweep through with a vast army to conquer and administer (most of) the continent as a collective UN-run organization, what exactly do you recommend?
You totally forgot the frustrating bit about actively avoiding medical personnel, because you know, the local village shaman said they were evil.
Some of it is understandable (e.g. bush meat - when you can't buy hamburger at the local grocer, you do what you have to in order to feed your family). Some of it is even semi-understandable with enough ignorance (e.g. fleeing to the US or EU because the infection you just got is a death sentence back home, but you at least have some chance of surviving it in the first world). Much of it however is not.
Here in Portland a lot of roads downtown lost square footage thanks to wide swaths of green-painted areas which are bike-only, forcing cars to concentrate themselves into fewer lanes, wearing those portions of the road out faster, etc.
Also, in many locales, bicycles do require a license anyway (mostly to assist in recovering stolen ones). Wouldn't take much to slap a tax on those bad boys, and without much overhead beyond what's already in place.
A huge percentage are frickin' snowflakes demand to be given the same rights and berth as automobiles, then blatantly violate every traffic rule there is. Worst part is when they blow off such things as, oh I dunno, signaling, then get mad when you have to slam on the brakes to avoid turning them into road pizza - then they look at you like *you* did something wrong. Then there's the complete disregard for traffic lights (oh, the light's red? Well I'm a pedestrian now, so screw you and give way as I suddenly pull out of my lane and ride across the crosswalk without warning!)
Mind you, a good share of bicyclists here are perfectly fine with obeying traffic rules, are are easy to share the road with. It's the massive percentage which behave like jackasses and (for instance) demand to use the middle lane (at 10mph) in spite of the really fat bike paths on either side of the road... the urge to turn them into road pizza gets strong, but that only makes them martyrs, and good luck getting a fair trial in this town should you hit one.
Funny thing - my wife is using a laptop w/ Linux Mint (when she isn't using an iPad) because she took one look at Windows 8 and hated it... so it's not like there isn't any precedent.
Funny thing - I've upgraded OSX twice on my laptop, and each time, my old prefs and settings were right where I left them. Even the wallpaper was where I left it. The only settings I had to dork around with were ones attached to new features...
You gonna charge them with crating a Tsunami? One that exceeded estimates by Government Officials?
Seems they have Witch Hunts in Japan too...
The idea isn't to charge them with the cause of the disaster, but with more than a little incompetence that they displayed afterwards - not to mention the often blatant lies they told to the public during the aftermath. Examples include publicly chewing out the Daiichi site supervisor for using seawater to keep the surviving reactors cooled down when that was pretty much all he had to use (given the alternative? Yeah, I'd piss on the things if it helped). Other examples include sending needed cooling water to the Daini site... in drinking water bottles. There's a whole host of other bork-ups, and the blame for the vast majority of them lies squarely on the execs in Tokyo.
Besides, I do respect one thing about the Japanese - when the shit hits the fan, the leaders are the first to take blame, and go out of their way to not pass the blame downhill unnecessarily. Up and down the chain, folks take responsibility for what they do (or don't do). Wouldn't hurt to see some of that attitude on this side of the Pacific...
I do kind of wonder about one thing, though... why are the engineers who designed that beast not being indicted? After all, nearly all of the vital pumps and generators were in the basements of both the Daiichi and Daini sites, with much of the critical equipment right next to the water, instead of uphill where they should have been (and at least not in basements... WTH, people?)
The Daini site lucked out big-time, with a monumental effort by the crews there to run enough cable from the few generators they still had working to the pumps which needed the juice - something like 2 miles of cable had to be scrounged and tied together.
BTW, props to the operators and supervisors onsite - for instance, the idea of scrounging car batteries and tying them together with inverters so that they could get the control panels back up was pretty genius. Same with having a special firefighting team from Tokyo come in to keep the storage pools full of water. At both sites they were stuck with having to come up with creative ways to avoid things from getting as bad as they could have.
I think that with a couple of design changes (both to the reactors and to the rest of the plant) they could have survived much better off than they were.
All that said, I don't think anyone could have predicted the size and scope of the tsunami that hit them. The TEPCO execs should still have to face a bit of music though (for instance, one site operator asking for 4,000 liters of water for a cooling pool and getting 4,000 bottles of drinking water instead? Damn, y'all...)
Slashdot Mirror
That happens right now with alarming regularity... at least for patients of the Veterans' Administration medical system. Such pharmacies often buy from different suppliers, and oftentimes the size, shape, and even color of the pill will change over time - you only find out when you open the bottle.
Actually, those aren't impossible hurdles.
cost would likely be way less than some of what a hospital buys (e.g. a CT machine), and it could pay for itself over time like any other machine - amortization is your friend in that department. Liability is handled as well, since hospitals (and even their in-house pharmacies in particular) often have to insure against potential drug-related liabilities anyway (misdiagnosis, mislabeling, adverse drug interactions, improper storage procedures, etc).
Now *regulations* are gonna be the big hurdle... no idea what the FDA (or non-US equivalents) are going to demand, but if you think about it, there isn't much difference between this technology and what a pharmacy does right now with compounding, save for the 'on a computer' aspect (well, machinery too, but you get the idea).
It'd be easier to just do this:
#sudo chflags uchg /etc/sudoers
(chflags is the OSX equivalent of chattr. "uchg" is the equivalent of "+i" "nouchg" is "-i")
What makes you think that MS will use Windows Update to change settings?
Because they've done it before.
And you cannot prevent Apple from changing your shit when they update OS X.
Turn in your geek card, because yes you can modify OSX post-patch - you just have to be comfortable with a *nix command prompt and have sudo privs.
So if I happen to be visiting a website while it's being DDoS attacked, I'll be disconnected because I "participated" in the attack?
Pretty sure they're going to know if you sent just a few packets a minute or several million in the same time space...
If your SCADA machinery is plugged into the Public Internet, you got way bigger problems than whether or not it's a bot...
I think it would be easier to simply take command/control of those bots and start flushing hard drives (or whatever else will ensure it never reboots), then shut it down remotely.
Or, if you don't feel that destructive? Drop a small executable that removes all networking/modem/etc capabilities upon boot, then remotely restart the machine. They keep their cat pictures, and we don't have to deal with it being on the public network.
Yes it's completely unethical, etc... but maybe that's the one thing that will give the botted machine owners the hint that maybe they should take their boxes down to Geek Squad (or wherever) to get fixed?
Curious how a question of costs is somehow "offtopic"...
Guess I must've struck a few nerves.
Please explain how ~30-80 cents/gallon** taxation becomes "subsidized".
**depending on state and local excise taxation.
Okay, stop tape.
Unless you can point to or create an objective set of criteria for those "negative externalities" and do so in a way that sets an objective price point for them? It's a nice way of saying that pollution sucks, but way too subjective to actually use fairly. I guarantee that if ever put into statute, it would fast become a club with which to punish political enemies and convenient scapegoats.
Besides, who decides what is "energy intensive"? I'm pretty sure the old folks who rely on motorized gear just to stay out of a nursing home, or a crippled kid who relies on power-hungry medical equipment just to stay alive would object to your assessment, no?
I know what the panels will cost (specious sourcing for that cost aside).
What I want to know is how much it's going to cost the rest of us.
How the hell much is this going to cost?
Note that cost has many dimensions here:
* taxes
* personal cost of having to replace bits and bobs to meet these efficiency standards
* increases in the power bill
etc...
It's nice to promise something, but has anyone run the numbers on cost to individuals and to the economy at large?
Fair cop, but consider that the same despots you cite are very active in absconding with any kind of aid that even smells like money. Outside of schools and hospitals (provided mostly by church-based charities, Catholic Relief Services chief among them)? You don't find much other types of aid reaching Africa, mostly because that shiz gets swiped by every corrupt pair of hands that can reach a piece of it.
So, unless you recommend that we re-establish colonial rule, or simply sweep through with a vast army to conquer and administer (most of) the continent as a collective UN-run organization, what exactly do you recommend?
You totally forgot the frustrating bit about actively avoiding medical personnel, because you know, the local village shaman said they were evil.
Some of it is understandable (e.g. bush meat - when you can't buy hamburger at the local grocer, you do what you have to in order to feed your family). Some of it is even semi-understandable with enough ignorance (e.g. fleeing to the US or EU because the infection you just got is a death sentence back home, but you at least have some chance of surviving it in the first world). Much of it however is not.
Actually...
Here in Portland a lot of roads downtown lost square footage thanks to wide swaths of green-painted areas which are bike-only, forcing cars to concentrate themselves into fewer lanes, wearing those portions of the road out faster, etc.
Also, in many locales, bicycles do require a license anyway (mostly to assist in recovering stolen ones). Wouldn't take much to slap a tax on those bad boys, and without much overhead beyond what's already in place.
Pfft! We get that in Portland now...
A huge percentage are frickin' snowflakes demand to be given the same rights and berth as automobiles, then blatantly violate every traffic rule there is. Worst part is when they blow off such things as, oh I dunno, signaling, then get mad when you have to slam on the brakes to avoid turning them into road pizza - then they look at you like *you* did something wrong. Then there's the complete disregard for traffic lights (oh, the light's red? Well I'm a pedestrian now, so screw you and give way as I suddenly pull out of my lane and ride across the crosswalk without warning!)
Mind you, a good share of bicyclists here are perfectly fine with obeying traffic rules, are are easy to share the road with. It's the massive percentage which behave like jackasses and (for instance) demand to use the middle lane (at 10mph) in spite of the really fat bike paths on either side of the road... the urge to turn them into road pizza gets strong, but that only makes them martyrs, and good luck getting a fair trial in this town should you hit one.
Funny thing - my wife is using a laptop w/ Linux Mint (when she isn't using an iPad) because she took one look at Windows 8 and hated it... so it's not like there isn't any precedent.
Funny thing - I've upgraded OSX twice on my laptop, and each time, my old prefs and settings were right where I left them. Even the wallpaper was where I left it. The only settings I had to dork around with were ones attached to new features...
With a little luck, maybe folks will realize this take matters into their own hands?
Pretty much this. GP forgot that mobile !=desktop, and Firefox/Mozilla was complaining about the desktop restrictions.
I'll just leave this right here...
You gonna charge them with crating a Tsunami? One that exceeded estimates by Government Officials?
Seems they have Witch Hunts in Japan too...
The idea isn't to charge them with the cause of the disaster, but with more than a little incompetence that they displayed afterwards - not to mention the often blatant lies they told to the public during the aftermath. Examples include publicly chewing out the Daiichi site supervisor for using seawater to keep the surviving reactors cooled down when that was pretty much all he had to use (given the alternative? Yeah, I'd piss on the things if it helped). Other examples include sending needed cooling water to the Daini site... in drinking water bottles. There's a whole host of other bork-ups, and the blame for the vast majority of them lies squarely on the execs in Tokyo.
Besides, I do respect one thing about the Japanese - when the shit hits the fan, the leaders are the first to take blame, and go out of their way to not pass the blame downhill unnecessarily. Up and down the chain, folks take responsibility for what they do (or don't do). Wouldn't hurt to see some of that attitude on this side of the Pacific...
I do kind of wonder about one thing, though... why are the engineers who designed that beast not being indicted? After all, nearly all of the vital pumps and generators were in the basements of both the Daiichi and Daini sites, with much of the critical equipment right next to the water, instead of uphill where they should have been (and at least not in basements... WTH, people?)
The Daini site lucked out big-time, with a monumental effort by the crews there to run enough cable from the few generators they still had working to the pumps which needed the juice - something like 2 miles of cable had to be scrounged and tied together.
BTW, props to the operators and supervisors onsite - for instance, the idea of scrounging car batteries and tying them together with inverters so that they could get the control panels back up was pretty genius. Same with having a special firefighting team from Tokyo come in to keep the storage pools full of water. At both sites they were stuck with having to come up with creative ways to avoid things from getting as bad as they could have.
I think that with a couple of design changes (both to the reactors and to the rest of the plant) they could have survived much better off than they were.
All that said, I don't think anyone could have predicted the size and scope of the tsunami that hit them. The TEPCO execs should still have to face a bit of music though (for instance, one site operator asking for 4,000 liters of water for a cooling pool and getting 4,000 bottles of drinking water instead? Damn, y'all...)
I'm still mad they moved HOVER! to be just a web extension... bastards.