Beg pardon, but just because Microsoft changed the message that "VER" returns to "Windows 95" doesn't mean that it isn't DOS - I used DR-DOS v6 with Windows 95, back in the day, just fine (ignoring the error message on boot).
I also used QEMM-386 in place of EMM386, until MS finally broke it with Windows 98SE.
Indelible, my butt! Hopefully, as one matures as best one can (me, I'm still working on that, just ask my wife ), one lesson learned is that taking responsibility for personal actions is a _choice_, regardless of outside influences, past experiences, etc.
Indelible implies irreversible, and personally, I don't think that THAT is true...
Slashdot Mirror
So...
Have you SEEN these chips in action? Do you actually have a motherboard that has an Intel implementation of DRM?
Why not wait to see what happens, instead of spreading FUD?
Beg pardon, but just because Microsoft changed the message that "VER" returns to "Windows 95" doesn't mean that it isn't DOS - I used DR-DOS v6 with Windows 95, back in the day, just fine (ignoring the error message on boot).
I also used QEMM-386 in place of EMM386, until MS finally broke it with Windows 98SE.
Um, beg pardon, but, so far as I know, all translations of the Bible are deemed to be inspired by God, and so divinely accurate by definition...
Sorry, couldn't resist playing Devil's Advocate .
Indelible, my butt! Hopefully, as one matures as best one can (me, I'm still working on that, just ask my wife ), one lesson learned is that taking responsibility for personal actions is a _choice_, regardless of outside influences, past experiences, etc.
Indelible implies irreversible, and personally, I don't think that THAT is true...
Regards, and stepping down from my soapbox now,
dj