Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Sinks Teeth Into New Orleans

An anonymous reader writes: "The New Orleans Times-Picayune is reporting that Mayor Nagin is considering letting Microsoft upgrade the city's computers free of charge. The catch? New Orleans eventually has to buy the software and Microsoft gets to use the city as a marketing model to push this on the rest of the country." According to the article, a similar system Microsoft developed for Oklahoma "is expected to expand into accident reporting, video arraignment and automated pawn-shop-ticket tracking." So don't worry about privacy -- it's all taken care of. Open bidding's taken care of too: "Because these services are considered a gift, the city won't have to publicly bid the project." Sounds like dirty pool to me.

366 comments

  1. Handcuffs by !splut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Consider these handcuffs a gift from Microsoft.

    Go ahead. Try them on. Fits real nice, huh?

    You will, of course, have to pay for them later.

    -----

    --
    The angel in the oatmeal.
    1. Re:Handcuffs by c1pher · · Score: 1

      and open source is the key! ::insert cheap joke drum/symbol beat::

      --
      The Adult Happy Meal - "I'm lovin' it!"
    2. Re:Handcuffs by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      The big payoff is when the new IT infrastructure goes MS only. When you can do much of your civic duties/responsibilities via computer (as is the likely future), it's important to make sure that you're not forcing everybody onto one system. MS has an extensive history of using loss leaders to get market share and eventual lock-in at which point your freebies stop and they make all that money back and more. Using New Orleans as a loss leader to get 50 other cities immediately, and New Orleans itself later isn't a bad strategy for MS, just a bad strategy for New Orleans.

    3. Re:Handcuffs by Chexsum · · Score: 0

      This day should be called Gather and Hunt day from now on. Two posts about locking people into one market have been posted today.

      Does anyone else want to own up to herding customers into a market?

      --
      Pixels keep you awake!
  2. Doesn't New Orleans already have a bad rep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For corruption, gluttony, and other vices?

    1. Re:Doesn't New Orleans already have a bad rep? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bribing the Police Department.
      Good start.

  3. Eventually... by fok · · Score: 1

    eventually has to buy the software... nice...

    --
    \m/
    1. Re:Eventually... by CarbonJackson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article says they eventually have to buy software, as in down the road they'll pay for software but not the stuff that is being given to them. I'm from New Orleans, and frankly unless something like this happened, there is no way our city's information infrastructure was going to be overhauled. In the article, it said it was saving us $100 million. Except that New Orleans doesn't have $100 million to spend.

      They're not just talking about giving away unlimited copies of Windows XP, they're talking about modernizing and developing systems that antiquated or non-existant. City gov't could go download all the copies of Linux they like, but they still would have to pay people to build the databases and various systems our city lacks. I recently got a traffic ticket down here. On the ticket it tells you can pay on the web or by phone. Guess what? Those systems simply don't exist! Our city's IT capabilities are in shambles.

      Sorry fellas, but this is GOOD thing for the city of New Orleans.

      --

      MikeAtIF*ckStuffedAnimalsDotCom
    2. Re:Eventually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > still would have to pay people to build the
      > databases and various systems our city lacks

      Sounds great but you do realize that M$ has been spouting off for years that those expenditures pale in comparison to the full life of the system.

    3. Re:Eventually... by limekiller4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see your point, but the question is, "are you going from the the frying pan to the fire."

      And the honest answer is, "I don't know."

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    4. Re:Eventually... by gilroy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Blockquoth the poster:

      In the article, it said it was saving us $100 million. Except that New Orleans doesn't have $100 million to spend.

      This is almost certainly Bad Politican Math. Who came up with the number? Whom did they consult? I think it is shady, if not illegal, that

      Meffert [city tech officer] who has been working for weeks on the Microsoft deal, recommended the contract cancellation after saying the job could be done for less than $100,000 [emphasis added]

      Did he get those numbers from Microsoft? Perhaps there was an ulterior motive in them?


      We don't really know if this is the best solution, because


      Because these services are considered a gift, the city won't have to publicly bid the project, he said. [emphasis added]

      I'm reminded of the KIA commercial where one guy is bragging about buying the most expensive car in America and KIA guy comments, "Well, mine is the least expensive... I guess I saved $493,000" at which Obligatory Babe's eyes light up in awe of his fortune.


      Whenever anyone advertises using the line "Such a good deal, you can't afford not to buy", you should take a pass.

    5. Re:Eventually... by sopwath · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Modernizing and devolpment are great, but just like Linux, New Orleans is going to need people to support Windows. Even at a smaller college here in Minnesota, it can take a lot of man hours to get a new system up and running (whether its wireless, a new mail server, or just updating 300 new computers)

      Getting ahead now is fine, but what is Microsft going to say 5 years from now when its time to upgrade again? Do you really think they'll allow the city to keep its copies of Windows XP when the special license agreement says they must upgrade or else?

      How about maintaining systems that have known major security flaws? Someone finding out you got a traffic ticket might not be a big deal, but what about the fact you got arrested 12 years ago, or how much money you make... Not that Linux is totally secure, but theres a lot easier ways of fixing problems once they're found.

      If you need a system customized for running a traffic ticket managment system, then Linux can be customized to do so. Do you need a way to keep track of city salaries, Linux can do a better job of managing a database of names and income levels.

      If the city doesn't have money to buy software, how are they going to afford the actual hardware to run XP on? Its great for gaming if you can have that 2GHz P4, but for older systems its just going to hold things back.

    6. Re:Eventually... by reallocate · · Score: 2

      Financial resources aside, where else can New Orleans go to get this done? IBM? Sun? Oracle? Lockheed-Martin? The alternatives are few. Who in the open source world could handle this?

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    7. Re:Eventually... by CarbonJackson · · Score: 1

      I'll refer you to this post for more info:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=38180&cid=40 88 941

      Of note, when Nagin started *asking* about the old computer contract, he recieved death threats. That should give you an idea just how screwed up things are down here. Also keep in mind that Nagin's only been in office for 90 days, and in that time he's earned himself quite a bit of credibility. He's trying to fix an orginization that is rampantly corrupt and just plain old broken. I don't know if he'll succeed, but I believe that right now, he's honestly trying.

      --

      MikeAtIF*ckStuffedAnimalsDotCom
    8. Re:Eventually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did not point ot any *evidence*. All your talk is just plain marketing. "Death threads" "100 milion" "we can't afford" "good for the city". Go take a walk...

    9. Re:Eventually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly why Microsoft targetted New Orleans, because they had no other options available. If they had another option and also some sense, then they would have gone with Linux rather than put their fate into a totally untrustworthy company.

      It's a temporary good thing for New Orleans.

      I hope that there's a follow-up to this, when the system is up... and... uh... running?

      I wonder how much your taxes will need to go up to compensate the city-wide annual upgrades?

      Have you ever thought of moving to Nebraska?

    10. Re:Eventually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I live in New Orleans (for ten years) also and i am sorry Carbon, but your thinking is flawed. Microsoft sells unsecure crappy products and this city does not need to be locked into a vendor that is convicted of monopoly crimes. Nagin is suppose to be a man of the future and this would just be another example of old school New Orleans doing business with crooks (microsoft). The city's lead IT person does not support the plan and neither do i as a citizen, there are better alternatives. I think you may be a MCSE who sees this as potential income. This job needs to opened to contract BIDS.
      Think about it Carbon, Bill Gates came down to Xavier and all the city's leaders treated him like royalty. Bill talked with city leaders and probably realized what a gold mine this city is due to the old IT infrastructure and how little Nagin and his associates know about it. The way Bill presents himself and the way business people treat him IS DISGUSTING.
      please wake up carbon.

      FYI, i totally support all the corruption crackdowns Nagin has enacted and he will get my vote next election, I just want him to consider the alternatives to microsofts model.

    11. Re:Eventually... by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      In the article, it said it was saving us $100 million. Except that New Orleans doesn't have $100 million to spend.

      $100 million in what? Software? So, how much for the hardware? This number is meaningless as it is set by the same people who give this "discount"? This message costs $100 trillion to read. Congratulation, you just saved $100 trillion you did not have.

      It's all a game. New Orleans will pay more for maintaining these systems then they would for building realiable systems to begin with. There is an old russian saying - "A cheap man pays twice."

      Now on the other hand, if M$ is springing for the hardware (yeah, right!)I say let them do it, then wipe it clean and build a reliable system on the hardware.

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    12. Re:Eventually... by slickwillie · · Score: 2

      I wonder how much the city will save after the lawsuits from Sun, IBM, Red Hat, et al, are settled?

    13. Re:Eventually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an ex-Louisiana resident (thankfully!), Nola does have $100 million to spend ... except that it goes to crooked politicians and Tom Benson.

      I would expect Nola to sell out like this. Louisiana sucks.

    14. Re:Eventually... by Temsi · · Score: 1

      ...but what about the fact you got arrested 12 years ago, or how much money you make...

      Both can easily be found out today anyway. Both are public records.

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    15. Re:Eventually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

    16. Re:Eventually... by iggly_iguana · · Score: 1

      I'm from the City of New Orleans, and I have seen stranger things happen in that state.

      It has a history of corruption and "strange deals". Study it's history! And, don't believe that these are things from the past.

      Mod this as a troll if you like, but I would be VERY interested in seeing who gets what money and when.

      So, while I agree that the city's infrastructure wouldn't get updated without this, here are the two thoughts that immediately pop into my mind:

      1. I believe that somebody will get their pockets lined somewhere.

      2. The city isn't undergoing any other type of growth or updating. I'm not sure the IT infrastructure should be the first thing "updated" in New Orleans.

      Born and raised there. I love the city, but there are MANY other things New Orleans could use before an IT upgrade. Don't even get me started on the Arena...

    17. Re:Eventually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So what are the City requirement for suppliers? The City Code is not online, but is probably in public libraries.

      Louisiana state agencies can do single source purchasing, if the "procurement officer" certifies it is necessary. This is the same person who can decide whether or not a vendor is unsuitable to do business with. How does the City handle purchasing?

    18. Re:Eventually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not a GOOD thing. The feeble excuses you give don't hold water. From what you are saying, the systems aren't in place, and IT folks will have to build them. Guess what, though - they'll have to build the databases, etc. whether they use Linux or Windows! If they don't exist, then they have to be built. Windows may give the appearance of being easy to use, but it certainly won't build your databases FOR you!

      Are you sure you don't work for MS?

    19. Re:Eventually... by PhreakOfTime · · Score: 1

      Your city's moon-rocket launching capabilities are in shambles too.

      "In the article, it said it was saving us $100 million. Except that New Orleans doesn't have $100 million to spend"

      the article also states a recent contract for $1.5 million was cancelled on the basis of determining it could be done for $100,000. Perhaps new orleans should be better able to control the cash it does have fisrt, before resulting to such a 'saving grace'. It may be the reason you dont have 100$ million to spend to begin with...

    20. Re:Eventually... by joesilicon · · Score: 1

      Your quote:

      Meffert [city tech officer] who has been working for weeks on the Microsoft deal, recommended the contract cancellation after saying the job could be done for less than $100,000 [emphasis added]

      I think you read this wrong. This was not about the MS deal, but about a different, 1.5 million dollar contract that he suggested New Orleans cancel. From how I read the article, it seems like Meffert is all for it.

      It does seem like this is a good opportunity for Red Hat, or IBM, or some other company to propose their own "gift" (way of doing things), so New Orleans might have a choice of technologies.

      As it is now, they are choosing between an "imminent meltdown", and all new technology.

    21. Re:Eventually... by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      "The only requirement the computer giant has made of the city is that New Orleans let Microsoft use it as a model for marketing the system to other governmental bodies once it is up and running, said Greg Meffert, the city's technology officer. Eventually, he added, the city will have to purchase software from the company, but he said it would be a "minuscule" expense." (my emphasis)

      It does not say they will have to buy THAT software, just that eventually they will have to buy SOME software. Can you say upgrades and security fixes? I thought you could!

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    22. Re:Eventually... by Rakarra · · Score: 2
      Now on the other hand, if M$ is springing for the hardware (yeah, right!)I say let them do it, then wipe it clean and build a reliable system on the hardware.

      Do you think MS would provide hardware without a clause in the contract stating New Orleans would have to give the computers back if they installed other operating systems on them? :)

    23. Re:Eventually... by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      Do you think MS would provide hardware without a clause in the contract stating New Orleans would have to give the computers back if they installed other operating systems on them? :)


      No, but we can dream, can't we....

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
  4. back to thier old tricks again by Anonymous+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Embrace and extinguish, only this time with government....

    --
    Hey, this is my sig, if you don't like it, STOP READING MY POSTS!
  5. how about... by matt4077 · · Score: 1

    we propose to the city to give them a linux installation. Free of charge, of course.

    1. Re:how about... by mickwd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah.

      Why the hell don't Red Hat's marketing department get off their a*ses and make a similar offer EVERY TIME Microsoft tries something like this.

      Red Hat are a commercial entity, and obviously want to make money. But why don't they offer government organisations like this all the free software they could want, for no money EVER, and just charge them for supporting it?

    2. Re:how about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Red Hat are a commercial entity, and obviously want to make money. But why don't they offer government organisations like this all the free software they could want, for no money EVER, and just charge them for supporting it?

      rtfa.

      It was more than just the software, it was the hardware too; the whole systems business.

      Red Hat can't afford that kind of offer, not yet. Only a company with ~$38Billion can afford to do this, repeatedly.

    3. Re:how about... by Mordibity · · Score: 1

      Not Red Hat. Too small. Think Big Blue. They should be in a van, following Microsoft around the country. ;-)

    4. Re:how about... by wytcld · · Score: 2
      Red Hat are a commercial entity, and obviously want to make money. But why don't they offer government organisations like this all the free software they could want, for no money EVER, and just charge them for supporting it?

      Why leave it to Red Hat? Any organized band of Open Sourcerors could go into any town and slap together a pretty good infrastructure using cheap hardware and the GPL'd distro and daemons of choice. If they keep a record of the steps taken, this can be posted as a HOWTO. The model of "We'll get it going for free, and then members of our team will compete on the open market for support contracts after the first X months of operation," would have to look better than Microsoft's "We'll get it going for free, and then you're locked into us for decades as a sole-source vendor."

      The only question - the critical one - is how to form an anarchic gang of Open Sourcerors into something a town could feel responsible contracting with. First genius to figure that out will have done as much as Linus to afford us all prosperous consulting careers down the road. So, how to form our Seven Sourceri, and take on the gang terrorizing the town "for its own good"?

      --
      "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    5. Re:how about... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      They *do*. You download the goddamn ISOs for free, burn them, and then purchase commercial support.

      MS is still on top because more people know their software, because they're agressive and nasty about keeping file formats and protocols their own, because there is no good free MS Word equivalent for Linux, and because they can afford pay off the right people.

    6. Re:how about... by mickwd · · Score: 2

      "You download the goddamn ISOs for free....."

      Is that right? Wow, you really taught me something there I don't know already...

      OK, so you know that, and I know that, but do they (the people that make the decisions) know that?

      Almost certainly not. It's not their job to know.

      Which is why Red Hat, or IBM, or a trustable (to them) organisation of groups and individuals should be talking to them and explaining the alternatives, and the advantages of the alternatives.

    7. Re:how about... by bobKali · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that it's more than just the software involved, it's the entire infrastructure that's got to be revamped. I'm involved in exchanging data with the New Orleans, and we had to jump through (small) hoops to send them uncompressed 3490 tapes because their tape drives were too old to handle compressed tapes, and they were unable to handle encrypted email attachments or even uploading 3.5 inch floppy disks to their mainframe.

      You can't just give them the software, they also need the systems set up and configured to work together, and that's not a easy or cheap proposal - and M$ is willing to do it for "free" right now in order to get their hooks in. How many of you out there are willing to come down here and spend the next 2 years working on upgrading this city from Windows 3.1 and Novell to *nix for free?

      On the bright side, our city has a long history of chewing up and spitting out companies who try to do business down here. The corruption in M$ is nothing compared to the corruption in NO.

  6. EULA? by Xtraneous · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does the entire city now have to read and agree to microsoft's EULA?

    --
    .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
  7. Gives new meaning to "The Big Easy" by DaSheeter · · Score: 0

    Classic Microsoft marketing. Hook 'em first, then they're yours for life.

    1. Re:Gives new meaning to "The Big Easy" by CarbonJackson · · Score: 1

      I just want to point out that it was Mayor Nagin that approached Microsoft.

      --

      MikeAtIF*ckStuffedAnimalsDotCom
    2. Re:Gives new meaning to "The Big Easy" by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      I just want to point out that it was Mayor Nagin that approached Microsoft.

      (As a man in a suit opens a briefcase full of benjamins)... "Mr. Nagin... my associate would like to make you an offer you can't refuse, but you must go to meet him..."
      Ya... that way its all legit right?

  8. At least it's better than suing by WildBeast · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're offering them a good deal, they're not suing them. For the non-initiated, it's called business.

    1. Re:At least it's better than suing by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

      Its sometimes called dumping, but only when it happens to be a foreign company. The sad thing is that they consider windows to be better than linux, at the same price.

    2. Re:At least it's better than suing by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      "My father assured him that when he left, either his brains or his signature would be on that contract."

      Yeah, it's just business.

      (FWIW, considering the city would have likely gone with MS products anyway, this is a slightly better deal.)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:At least it's better than suing by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, last I saw, Bill Gates was trading copies of Windows 2000 Server and SQL Server for a set of beads.

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    4. Re:At least it's better than suing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the product is so good you wouldn't need incentives. Public offices are supposed to give their citizens good value for money and by using Open Source they are doing the same job for a fraction of the cost.

    5. Re:At least it's better than suing by WildBeast · · Score: 2

      good enough, so between a FREE Windows and a FREE Linux, they chose the FREE Windows. So in there view, Windows is much better.

    6. Re:At least it's better than suing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good enough, so between a FREE Windows and a FREE Linux, they chose the FREE Windows. So in there view, Windows is much better.

      Of course, just like the product marked down 80% to $19.95 is much better than the one that was originally priced for $19.95, in most people's view. Tell people you're giving something away for free, and they'll probably turn their noses up at it. Tell them you normally charge a million dollars for it, but for a limited time, they can get it for free with this special offer, and they'll beat down your door.

      For bonus points, how many, "impromptu meetings" "sales and marketing conferences", etc, etc, do you think the average Linux exec can afford to arrange?

  9. Bid process by MobileDude · · Score: 1

    >>Open bidding's taken care of too: "Because
    >>these services are considered a gift, the city
    >>won't have to publicly bid the project."

    This won't last long under public scrutiny.

    -------
    Coming soon! Microsoft Bob II !!!

    --
    10 MD .\crash 20 CD .\crash 30 GOTO 10
    1. Re:Bid process by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      It may not depending on the amount spent to buy the software. In some locales things don't have to be bid on if they are under a certain amount.
      Another thing I thought of, If there is another big project that requires a bid Microsoft won't be able to just push thier product on them, they will have to bid on it like everyone else.
      I'm also amused by the fact that during this project MS will have to work with all these city goverment people. ANYONE who has worked with state or local goverment knows what a joy that can be. /me snickers

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    2. Re:Bid process by stmintz · · Score: 1

      I think it's nice you think so highly of the public. Do you honestly believe this?

    3. Re:Bid process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. Most people might bitch a little but in the end it will go unaffected.

      I'll give you an example. In Oklahoma they had a nice little jail built. Bidding was done, a team got the job based on that bid and the jail was built. Then the problem start appearing, toilets for some floors back up into other floors, the glass blocks used in the cells aren't reinforced so prisoners can chisel them out and escape and a whole host of other problems. The plumbing inspector hadn't ever actually come into the building but said he went by the schematics given to him to approve the facility. Also as it turns out the contractors building the facility just happen to be buddies with the guys who hired them based on their bid. Not only that but they got a nice little agreement going to keep from being sued and so in the end noone gets hurt.
      Of course the news channels covered it, the DA got involved, there was a huge outcry by the public... and then SQUAT! Noone went to jail, noone got sued, noone got banned from government contracts, no business license revocation, noone even lost their job that I remember. It all went quietly away the contractors paid something like $100,000 (per the terms of the contract) which left the tax payers to come up with the rest to fix the very significant problems with the jail.

      And this kind of crap happens all over. So don't say that this isn't going to last under public scrutiny because even the people who give a rats ass have very short memories.

  10. Shady But Brilliant by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Regardless of what we say about them, their marketing department is effective. With out that, we would not be discussing them today..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Shady But Brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their marketing department is also DECEPTIVE. Poor, poor New Orleans.

      Their is a place called New Orleans,
      They're stuck up Bill Gates' bum,
      They sold their souls for software,
      They'll soon find out they're dumb.

  11. Oh please! by swaic · · Score: 1


    And that surprises anyone how?

  12. I've got a better idea.......... by AciDive · · Score: 1

    The IT staff for these towns should get together and offer to upgrade the entire system to Linux or *BSD for free. Since the OS would already be free and the city is already paying the IT workers to work there is no cost at all. But if dune the M$ way NO will have to pay M$ for everything in the long run.

    --
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect." Linus Torvalds
  13. Hey Great! by ObitMan · · Score: 0

    More power to them if it works out!
    Just imagine the PR hit if it fails or bites them in the ass somehow.
    The terms of the deal are probably pretty restrictive, and the city gov is probably locking themselves into something they know nothing about.
    But I don't live there so I could care less.

    --
    Who run Barter Town?
  14. Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is a business. They are smart at attempting to acheive Vendor lockin with their customers. This is easy once in the door, they can then be a cheaper solution to new problems the organization (customer) faces. Microsoft is not the only organization to operate this way...most of them do.

    1. Re:Business by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yeah, that's a really good point.

      As much as it might seem shady, the reality here is that Microsoft is just acting like a business -- trying to find ways to get around spending processes to get their products into new areas. If they were passing up the opportunities like this, I (were I a stockholder) would be screaming for the head of the sales dept.

      The ones who ought to be ashamed here are the New Orleans officals who are trying to sidestep the processes set up to discourage, well, this sort of thing. They may be following the letter of the law, but they're blatently violating the spirit.

      It's up to the voters to punish them.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  15. SCMODS by Redline · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the Article:
    New Orleans police will be using a system Microsoft developed for the state of Oklahoma. Dubbed the Offender Data Information System, the system can link dozens of law enforcement agencies, jails and court systems.

    From the Blues Brothers:
    Elwood:"I bet these cops got SCMODS."
    Jake:"SCMODS?"
    Elwood:"State, County, Municiple Offender Data System."
    Jake:"Shit!"

    1. Re:SCMODS by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      What makes it even funnier is Offender Data Information System, ODIS will sound like "Otis" coming out of a southerners mouth.
      Cop #1: What did otis say about him?
      Cop #2: dunno aint talked to him yet.
      Cop #1: Not the Seargent, the doohicky on the dash!

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    2. Re:SCMODS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suckie Suckie want some pimp for your karma whore?

  16. Amazing... by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

    You have to credit Microsoft with one thing... They sure know how to run a business...

    --
    100% Insightful
  17. Hmmm...Not good. by robpoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It shuts out network OS competition, and it shuts out hundreds of companies that develop applications for cities and governments.

    A lot of cities and their respective police departments have a "no gift" policy. In other words, an officer or government official cannot accept a gift - as it could be seen as a bribe.

    No. Wait. It *is* a bribe.

    "Here, take this software for free so you will be stuck in my neverending upgrade cycle. You'll have to pay me later, then pay me again when you go to upgrade."

    Something stinks here..

    --
    = Grow a brain...
    1. Re:Hmmm...Not good. by i_luv_linux · · Score: 0
      Wait a minute, if this is a bribe, then if a company gives away free software and then charge for the services, does this also count as a bribe.

      Do you think that any company which builds its own business on free software will bribe if it gives away free software to schools, governments and so on, so that it can later on charge for the services?

      Be smart and honest please.

    2. Re:Hmmm...Not good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the very least whoever is using such free software would have the ability to either hire personnel to handle any post-install service or could make consultants bid on the work.

      Sure, the government could do the same thing with MS software too, but at least they don't have to pay for the software itself. Ever.

    3. Re:Hmmm...Not good. by donutello · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of cities and their respective police departments have a "no gift" policy. In other words, an officer or government official cannot accept a gift - as it could be seen as a bribe.
      (emphasis mine)

      It is not ok for an officer to accept a gift for themselves. This is a gift to the city. There's a HUGE difference.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    4. Re:Hmmm...Not good. by LobsterMagnet · · Score: 1
      It shuts out network OS competition, and it shuts out hundreds of companies that develop applications for cities and governments.
      • Listen, I like M$ as much as the next /.er, but if redhat, REALLY wanted this business they would go out and get it. While Microsuck is out monopolizing the computer market, nobody, save apple, is trying to do anything about it. If M$ is gonna go down, somebody has to at least try to compete with them.
      --
      I will not be trained.
    5. Re:Hmmm...Not good. by csteinle · · Score: 1

      How would giving away for free something that has an actual normal sale price of $0.00 be a bribe?

    6. Re:Hmmm...Not good. by OrthonormalBasisVect · · Score: 1

      Ooof - I'd tend to agree on two fronts 1) This does choke out other potential competitors who cannot afford to do the vast part of the job gratis - I'd argue that MSFT be forced to compensate N.O. reasonably for the use of the 'expertise' of the city in developing such software. It's certainly not very competitive on this front, if I were a small software developer in N.O with any kind of governmental client base, I'd sue for unfair practices 2) Bottom line is that in general, MSFT software quality is going from bad to worse. Yes, they are still dominant, but they're a collection of warring fiefdoms that produce more schlock than quality. If they actually manage to get themselves into the business of 'software for governments' I would not like this one bit. Right now their mistakes are a PITA, in the brave new world they envision, their mistakes could be considerably more costly to individuals In short, I don't see this as any deal for New Orleans. They're giving away incredibly valuable knowledge without being paid for it, they're effectively shutting out any potential real competitor who can give greater long term value, and they're supporting a company with some of the worst software quality I have ever seen. Glad I don't live there.

    7. Re:Hmmm...Not good. by Casualposter · · Score: 0

      Yes, but this is NEW ORLEANS...which is a part of the rather unusual state of Louisiana. And in Louisiana, there is a long tradition of Graft, corruption, and financial games that seem to put yet and another expensive item in the hands of the local/state/national politician. If MS wants to get involved in New Orleans and the rest of LA politics...well it'll make interesting reading. I figure that MS will get reamed really good before this deal is over.

      --
      Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
    8. Re:Hmmm...Not good. by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 2

      How can they call this a "gift" if there are strings attatched? The city *has* to buy the software, eventually, and they have to let Microsoft use them in commercials.

      It may not be money they're paying with, but they are paying.

    9. Re:Hmmm...Not good. by donutello · · Score: 1

      My point was just that it is not a bribe (unless there's something we dont' know about) because a bribe is given to benefit the officers while this is going towards the city with no obvious personal benefit for the officers.

      So it may not be a gift, but it's not a bribe.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
  18. And everyone was wondering.... by DLR · · Score: 1

    ...why I said forcing government to use only open source software was a good thing....

    Pay Microsoft later? Oh, they'll pay later all right. Plus interest!

    --
    "Like fire and fusion, government is a dangerous servant and a terrible master."~RAH
  19. Is it a test to... by d2002xx · · Score: 0

    crash all computers in the city and see what will happened.

  20. So Let Me Guess by tealover · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone here is smarter than the politicians in New Orleans.

    Hmmmmm.

    That sounds about right.

    --
    -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    1. Re:So Let Me Guess by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Everyone here is smarter than the politicians in New Orleans.

      Hmmmmm.

      Maybe, maybe not. But the average slashdot reader is probably way more technically savvy (as well as Microsoft-aware) than the average politician.
    2. Re:So Let Me Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hee the point is that even if the those politicians are smart they are way toooo corrupt and their talents are working *against* the city.

    3. Re:So Let Me Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the average slashdot reader is a drooling retard and a flaming homosexual.

    4. Re:So Let Me Guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born in NOLA and lived there for 30 years before moving 18 months ago. Believe me, everyone reading this forum IS much more intlligent than Louisiana politicians.

  21. Just as here by Kz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here in Peru, the response from M$ to the Open Source proposal was not only the easily rebutted FUD letter. There was also a 'donation' of computers and software to the schools. All free, of course... for 5 years. after that, we'll have to pay for the priviledge of being locked-in with the propietary formats.

    And the same line: "Since it's a donation, there was no public bidding", and it will make impossible to apply the OpenSource law (if it would be approved).

    How can we escape? having no money is no longer a defense from being robbed

    --
    -Kz-
    1. Re:Just as here by krinsh · · Score: 1

      Since when was only Microsoft a 'proprietary' format? I seem to think that each individual *nix version; whether or not its software can be shared amongst its counterparts, is proprietary in that I can't run it on my Macintosh or Windows systems. Often the stuff is specifically designed *gasp* just like Microsoft! to be impossible to use on Windows.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    2. Re:Just as here by TheLastUser · · Score: 1

      Actually mac and win are the proprietary OS's. Unix OS's, by definition, adhere to "open systems" standards. This makes it easy to cross compile the same software for Solaris, HP/UX, OSF-1, IRIS, AIX, BSD, Linux, etc.

      That's what unix is, an open standard that anyone can choose to implement. Windows, on the other hand, is a closed standard, which makes life so difficult for the wine project.

      Apple and MS choose to not accept open systems standards for their own business reasons. I think MS was even developing an open systems OS before they decided to chuck it and create NT/win32.

    3. Re:Just as here by Kz · · Score: 1

      I'm not talking about propietary OS, not even about propietary software. The trouble and the big lock-in is the propetary FILE FORMATS and PROTOCOLS.

      That means that once the software has been used for a while, and the users don't care about the format used to save documets, they won't change because they fear they won't be able to use old documents.

      And the worst offender by far is MS Word. Changing it's format with every version, just to make everybody upgrage to the last and slowest, only to be able to read other people's documents.

      --
      -Kz-
    4. Re:Just as here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What planet do you come from? What the hell are you talking about? Does anybody else understand this moron or have I become brain dead?

      Dude, Microsoft made Proprietary the dirty word that it has become!!!!

      You need to try and learn about your subject before you go shouting out crap.

      Now go play.

  22. New Orleans + Microsoft by Liquidity · · Score: 1

    And what should we call this combination? Perhaps "The Big Sleazy"?

  23. Don't think you read the article by nharmon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to the Slashdot story... "New Orleans eventually has to buy the software..."

    Yet, the article says... Eventually, he added, the city will have to purchase software from the company...

    The article would suggest that future software will not be free. Not that the current software will, in the future, have to be purchased. A minor detail perhaps, but it does explain why the software is a gift.

    It would be like a gun maker giving pistols to a police department a substantial savings, but making them purchase their own magazines, springs, etc.

    I personally don't see a problem with what Microsoft is doing.

    1. Re:Don't think you read the article by CarbonJackson · · Score: 1

      You actually *read* the article! Bless your heart!

      --

      MikeAtIF*ckStuffedAnimalsDotCom
    2. Re:Don't think you read the article by eddy · · Score: 1

      It would be like a gun maker giving pistols to a police department a substantial savings, but making them purchase their own magazines, springs, etc.

      Umm.. no? That implies they can do their purchases from someone else, which this case doesn't sound like it would allow.

      MS: Here, take these fine Microsoft Products for "free". Looking forward to doing business with you in the future. <nudge, nudge>.

      State: Thanks, we'll just buy these fine distributions of Linux and call it even, then?

      Don't think so.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    3. Re:Don't think you read the article by ericman31 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem with what MS is doing is that they are managing to avoid the procurement process that most government agencies are subject to. Remember the outcry in California when the state sole-sourced a Master License Agreement with Oracle? And then, after a few months of people saying that the state shouldn't have done that, it turned out that there were some shady political contributions from Oracle to the Governor's office.

      If you look at the history of government procurement, racketereering and corrruption laws you will see that they were almost all passed to prevent sole-source government procurement because it's bad for the citizens. This is pretty tricky on Microsoft's part. It certainly violates the spirit of the law, if not the actual letter.

      --
      In my universe I'm perfectly normal, it's not my fault you don't live in my universe.
    4. Re:Don't think you read the article by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      It would be like a gun maker giving pistols to a police department a substantial savings, but making them purchase their own magazines, springs, etc. I personally don't see a problem with what Microsoft is doing.

      With most any other company, there wouldn't be. But given Microsoft's past behavior, what do you suppose their position will be on using any non-MS software whatsoever?

      It's like a gun maker giving pistols to the cops at a discount, then making them purchase their own magazines, springs, etc, but also decreeing what type of ammo they will use, what kind of range targets they'll use, what kind of cleaning oil, how the cops will use the guns, whether or not they are allowed to use any brand other than theirs, who they're allowed to shoot with them, etc, etc. They will take over the decisions usually left to people who actually own and use the stuff.

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    5. Re:Don't think you read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See? This is what makes Slashdot so much more unbiased than any other internet news site.

      If any other company gives stuff away for free under the terms that the recipient will have to purchase something else from them later, it's ok, but if it's Microsoft... Well I'll just stick that dollar sign in the name and let you imagine their motivation.

    6. Re:Don't think you read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are very bad at metaphors.

    7. Re:Don't think you read the article by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      It would be like a gun maker giving pistols to a police department a substantial savings, but making them purchase their own magazines, springs, etc.

      Actually, with Microsoft's history, it'd be more like a gun maker:

      Offering the army free muskets and musket balls;

      later "upgrading" their ammo to rounds for a Springfield rifle and discontinuing musket balls, forcing the army to buy new rifles to fire them; and

      using the contract and the "Springfield upgrade path" to prevent the police department from taking the Gatling guns offered for free by the citizenry.

    8. Re:Don't think you read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It would be like a gun maker giving pistols to a police department a substantial savings, but making them purchase their own magazines, springs, etc.


      FWIW, gun manufacturers DO give law enforcement organizations and officers a price cut. For example, the last gun I bought, a Glock 19, cost me just under $500. The law enforcement price would have been about $100-$125 less.

    9. Re:Don't think you read the article by nharmon · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. The city shouldn't have been so narrow in their options. And they should have allowed for an open bid. But that's the city's fault, not Microsoft's. Even though I distrust Microsoft by default, I don't think they're doing anything wrong here.

      Of course, if there is evidence of kickbacks that comes to surface, then I change my last opinion.

    10. Re:Don't think you read the article by dbrutus · · Score: 2

      But is it a gift? If you give something, you have passed ownership and your entire transaction income is $0. Everybody knows that Microsoft claims to never pass ownership to anybody. They license their software and they're obligating New Orleans to future purchases so they will get income from this. So it sounds like they are printing out a massive volume license agreement with up front discounting down to zero. If New Orleans *has to* purchase MS software under the contract, money will change hands at a future date and it's just an extended credit line we're talking about. After all, if you offer net 60 credit on a series of purchases, it's not considered a gift either.

    11. Re:Don't think you read the article by Jim+Norton · · Score: 1

      I don't see the problem with what Microsoft is doing either (i'm not necessarily saying that they AREN'T doing something shady here, however)

      However, I do see a problem with what the city is doing since this will probably end up costing them more in the long run. If this happened in my country I wouldn't be too impressed and would definitely make my feelings known to my MPP.

      Jim

      --
      -- Jim
    12. Re:Don't think you read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bless your heart!

      Stupid fucking cracker.

  24. it's not a gift... by Kunta+Kinte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If there's a contract involved.

    Microsoft is stipulating that they buy in the future, according to the article. There's an obvious transfer of value between parties.

    If I were in the position to bid in one of those cities, believe me, I would sue.

    --
    Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
    1. Re:it's not a gift... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I bid regularly on government contracts in my city. And you'd better believe, if Microsoft did something like that in the cities I bid in. I'd sue, also. Oh, by the way.. hey Microsoft. I live in Kansas City..

  25. "Gift" + "must eventually purchase"? by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Redundant

    How can it be a "gift" if it must be purchased? Is Arthur Anderson involved in the deal somehow?

    --
    Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    1. Re:"Gift" + "must eventually purchase"? by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
      Is Arthur Anderson involved in the deal somehow?

      No, that would be Accenture (formerly known as "Andersen Consulting"), the information systems consulting arm of Andersen Worldwide. Arthur Andersen was the "business consulting and audit" arm, and only in charge of iffy accounting, not of iffy software purchases.

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    2. Re:"Gift" + "must eventually purchase"? by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      My brother works for them. He's SOOOOO glad they were spun off a few years ago!

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  26. c'mon! by eddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they're indeed trying to get around the open bidding requirement (I assume such exists), then it's called dirty business.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:c'mon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is New Orleans, synonym for dirty business, after all. People are suprised why?

    2. Re:c'mon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They deserve all the dirty business after letting this guy destroy the world. Let Microsoft finish that city off.

  27. A Microsoft developed for Oklahoma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the article, a similar Microsoft developed for Oklahoma "is expected to expand into accident reporting, video arraignment and automated pawn-shop-ticket tracking."


    What is this poor grammar trying to convey? They made a Microsoft Corporation just for us Sooners?

  28. Learn how to r-e-a-d... by GiorgioG · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Eventually, he added, the city will have to purchase software from the company, but he said it would be a "minuscule" expense."

    It doesn't say they will have to purchase THE software from Microsoft, only that they will have to eventually buy software from Microsoft. Granted, it isn't very specific, but get your shit straight.

    1. Re:Learn how to r-e-a-d... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      purchase = buy

    2. Re:Learn how to r-e-a-d... by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      purchase the software != buy software

    3. Re:Learn how to r-e-a-d... by cascadefx · · Score: 2
      Blockquoteth:
      It doesn't say they will have to purchase THE software from Microsoft, only that they will have to eventually buy software from Microsoft. Granted, it isn't very specific, but get your shit straight.


      Ok. You're right. They don't have to by THE software, but the fact that they are then locked in to future aquisitions of Microsoft software means ipso facto that Microsoft has indeed bypassed any "Open Bid" systems that may be in place. Not for the software that Microsoft are "giving" away, but for the software that the gift locks New Orleans into buying in the future.

      Plus, the only reason that are getting the "miniscule" charge on future software purchases is because they agreed to this deal in the first place, which may consistitute a bribe. Granted, given Louisianna's political past, Microsoft chose a great place to try this tactic out. ;^)

      I smell lawsuit.

  29. Well, isn't that just lovely.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The New Orleans Police Department uses a system that holds 1 million records and is in imminent danger of meltdown, city officials said. Backup copies of most records exist on paper, but a crash could erase key data.

    So if you have a long ass rap sheet for shit like murder and arson, you can just roll up the the police station and burn the muthafucka down. Shit, if you're an arsonist, that should be your specialty. The catch, if you get caught, you're fucked. If you don't, you're a free man, with no police record. Who's gonna do it for the greater good of their fellow criminals.

  30. Wow. by URoRRuRRR · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of all the places, I never thought that world domination would begin with New Orleans

    --
    "Oh no, 3 horny women and only 2 condoms...Thank god I read slashdot"
    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of all the places, I never thought that Microsoft bashing would come from a slashbot with a low UID. Oh wait, yes I did.

  31. Typo in linked article title by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

    New Orleans News
    City may get free Microsoft makeover


    Typo: the "m" is makeover should read "t".
    We appologize for the error.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Typo in linked article title by EggplantMan · · Score: 1
      We appologize for the error.

      People in glass houses...

      --

      ?-|||-----x<*))))><
    2. Re:Typo in linked article title by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      It's funny. Laugh. Ha ha.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    3. Re:Typo in linked article title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha-ha microsoft is a monopoly, wouldn't it be funny if I made a monopoly joke!!!!1???

    4. Re:Typo in linked article title by Griim · · Score: 2

      That would be how the rest of the English-speaking world spells apologize.

    5. Re:Typo in linked article title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't punctuate properly.

    6. Re:Typo in linked article title by mgblst · · Score: 2

      typo: the "s" in is should read "ls;dkjfajtrpj4r".
      We appologize for the error.

      -

    7. Re:Typo in linked article title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got the tense wrong, its "didn't."

  32. Great! by naoursla · · Score: 2

    Fantastic! Now someone just needs to write free drop in replacements for the pieces MS is providing. MS can spend their resources on requirement analysis and setup, and when it is time to collect revenue, discover that they have been replaced. Maybe a large company with an interest in denying MS income would be willing to sponsor such a project.

  33. Shiny Red Candy-Like Button by Saxerman · · Score: 2
    Unfortunately government tends to have seriously shortsighted vision so the idea of "free now, pay later" is extremely appealing to them. It allows them to offer services for their voters right now, and they don't have to pay for it until the next (or later) budget comes around. Tomorrow's problems never come, and the first one's free. This amazing thinking helps explain the ever expanding national debt.

    From the article, refering to the new Offender Data Information System, "It gives them a lot more weapons in fighting crime," Meffert said. The reality? "We can not wield it! None of us can!"

    --

    A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

  34. Team of geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont think a team of geeks are going to come into Nawlins' and upgrade all systems with freash copies of debian in hand. Thank God microsoft is bailing us out here...govenment5.0.

    Geeks get off your ass and make proposels to the govenment if you want change.

  35. Doesn't make sense by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 5, Funny

    New Orleans is known for booze, sex and debauchery.

    You think they would have chosen BSD.
    . :)

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
    1. Re:Doesn't make sense by autechre · · Score: 1


      Hey, don't forget music! So...Violence, Music, Sex?

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  36. I see this a lot... by Salad+Shooter · · Score: 0

    Bitching about Microsoft and privacy, but we would be in this position if it were oracle, open source, etc.

    My point is that Microsoft has issues, but they cannot be as evil as the Slashdot community makes them out to be.

    Privacy is an issue that's OS agnostic.

  37. Open Source by Retype · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Tim O'Reilly said that if we try to force government to use open source Microsoft would do the same. Now you see, they are trying to force their software now, and we don't have a law yet. Here in my state in brazil, you have to give Open Source preference, so here and I think in Germany people are not concearned with this kind of shit. Well but you americans still sentence people to death...

    --

    I have no sig and I want to scream
    1. Re:Open Source by tshak · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Open Source is not always the best solution. It is better to not give anything a preference and simply choose technology for it's own merit, and then determine it's licensing afterwords.

      Yes, we still put people to death. People who murder, rape, and unfortunately has exhausted the grace of the people. And what do you do in Brazil? Let the guy out of prison in 5 years so he can rape and murder your mother? No, you keep him in prison for LIFE. How is that humane? Being locked up in a cage with other violent people. Have you even visited a minumum security prison, let alone a maximum security prison? I think death is a huge grace when compared to life in one of these hell holes.

      Anyone put to death is a very sad thing, no matter how bad they may have been. Nevertheless, evil exists, and the painful reality is that we have to take extreme measures to those consumed by said evil.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    2. Re:Open Source by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yes, we still put people to death. People who murder, rape, and unfortunately has exhausted the grace of the people.


      And it's well known that in the US, justice is fair and not biased towards the rich. For example, OJ Simpson was really acquitted because he was innocent, not because he was rich.


      And the poor black dude whose state-appointed lawyer was sleeping while he was sentenced to death in Texas, well, he was really guilty anyway.


      I know why I despise christians. They keep moralizing and thumping their bibles crying "thou shalt not kill", but man, when they really want to kill someone, they have the PR.

    3. Re:Open Source by eddy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I know why I despise christians. They keep moralizing and thumping their bibles crying "thou shalt not kill", but man, when they really want to kill someone, they have the PR.

      Most Paulists will say that 'kill' and 'murder' are two different things, and that their little cookie-cutter love-christ-manufacture was really only against murdering, not killing, which can be Just in the mind of ignorants.

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    4. Re:Open Source by black88 · · Score: 0

      So, are you somehow implying that EVERY american is a xian? Yeah, Brasil is REAL CIVILISED.

      The reason why we like to put people to death here, and I do realise that it ain't perfect, but when a crime is so heinous that life in prison seems like a favor, well, revenge is a good thing, and society needs catharsis and the feeling(whether or not it's a valid one) that some measure of justice has been meted out.

      I frankly think that the we are far TOO CIVILISED here in the USA; If it were up to me, I would allow the families of victims in certain cases to carry out their own personal death sentence.

      Of course, as many in the world believe, and I am not trying to step on toes here, or to be overly patriotic, but when anyone from a country such as practically any in Europe has the audacity to criticise our system of jsutice while not being allowed in their own homes to defend themselves, to own a weapon, to own a firearm.

      Not that the threat of an armed public citizenry has stopped the AA's, the Corps and the MultiNAtionals ffrom consolidating their power.

    5. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Christians"? Uh, don't you mean "Westerners"? You see, not everybody has a religeon, in fact most Westerners these days are pagan (or follow some other religeon such as Bhuddism).

      Please, just because following a religeon is your ultimate goal in life, please don't assume that the rest of the world follows suit.

      Jerk.

    6. Re:Open Source by black88 · · Score: 0

      Hey Tshak, I have a question, and small favor to ask(not bad for a total stranger, huh?!) The Meetup sounds cool, but i need to be in Portland on the 22nd. Go for Bauhaus!! Anyway, here's my ?. I am a musician, and currently use winxp, cuz the Linux support ain't totally there yet. So, since I can't be there to bring it up, perhaps you could. In particular the support of soundfonts(i know of sfx load, but it wasn't very intuitive (I know I should have rtfm!))with the Sblive Value. if someone could show me how to set up something like Mandrake or Lycoris for the optimum use for audio and midi I would be a new convert, which, I suspect, well, the reason so many people use windows who know better only do so becasue they have no feasible 'nix alternative. Thanks for your time Anthony Passonno

    7. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know why I despise christians. They keep moralizing and thumping their bibles crying "thou shalt not kill", but man, when they really want to kill someone, they have the PR.

      "How will we know who to kill?," a knight is supposed to have asked Abbot Arnold Aimery.
      "Slay them all," was the Abbot's response, "God will recognise his own."

    8. Re:Open Source by JPriest · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      They keep moralizing and thumping their bibles crying "thou shalt not kill", but man, when they really want to kill someone, they have the PR.

      lol, true, but most orginised religions are like that.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    9. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Slay them all," was the Abbot's response, "God will recognise his own."

      Lets just hope you are not in a position of power.

    10. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell? Like 3% of westerners are pagan, you fucking idiot. What kind of propeganda is your middle eastern government feeding you nowadays?

      Thank you,
      -The English Troll

    11. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jerk! Most Westerners have no religeon. Loads of people classify themselves as "Christian" just because that's what their parents were, or because that's what you're supposed to be. People only pray when things like September 11th happens, most of the time people talk about Jesus because they stubbed their toe rather than because they actually believe in him.

    12. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone put to death is a very sad thing, no matter how bad they may have been. Nevertheless, evil exists, and the painful reality is that we have to take extreme measures to those consumed by said evil.

      You are going to give me your crock of shit about how sad it is, if someone rapes children; proceeds to slit their throat slightly so they can slowly bleed to death and murder their family and friends in front of them in gruesome ways? How the fuck? Are you some sort of fucking animal? Those people being killed is not fucking sad! If you argue otherwise, I am correct; and you are an animal.

      Thank you,
      -The English Troll

    13. Re:Open Source by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I know why I despise christians. They keep moralizing and thumping their bibles crying "thou shalt not kill", but man, when they really want to kill someone, they have the PR.

      Most Paulists will say that 'kill' and 'murder' are two different things,

      "Thou shalt not kill" is a mistranslation that found its way into Latin and English translations. The original text would more accurately be translated "thou shalt not murder"...this is the original (Hebrew) text. It is also how it was translated to Greek, so there are some translations that managed to get it right. Thanks for playing, though.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    14. Re:Open Source by eddy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for playing, though.

      Huh? I'm very aware of this, my post did note this distinction, did it not?

      My reservation, however, isn't on the literal plane.

      ...but thanks for playing!

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    15. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Well but you americans still sentence people to death"

      People that kill outside of prison don't stop killing when they are in prison. Murders have also escaped prison and killed again.

      By not having the death penalty, you place a much higher value on the life of killer than the life of a prisoner, or a guard, or people outside prison.

      One of the planners of the 9/11 attack was released from jail in Europe because we would not guarantee no death penalty. Beside helping kill thousands of people in 9/11, I wonder how many other innocent people Europe has killed by it simple minded policy.

      Even though it is likely that a person could be wrongly executed, it looks like far more people are wrongly executed by murders in prison that are not given the death penalty. There is no error free perfect solution like unsophisticated Europeans believe.

    16. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The death sentance is supposed to deter criminals from doing crime. It doesn't and never will.

    17. Re:Open Source by tshak · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      A) I agree with your assesment of the US justice system accept that you exaggerate the problem. OJ Simpson may or may not be guilty, it is not for us to judge. Also, yes, to a small degree you can buy your way in court and I hope that changes radically. However, it's not as bad as you'd like to think.

      I know why I despise christians. They keep moralizing and thumping their bibles crying "thou shalt not kill", but man, when they really want to kill someone, they have the PR.


      Well, all properly translated contexts of that commandment are "thou shall not murder". Murdering is differnent then killing. Also, Christianity is the foundation of so many religions and denominations with such a wide array of beliefs that it's impossible to accurately classify any group of people as "Christians" whie claiming they all believe the same thing.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    18. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure how it's ignorant to love and protect my children from fucked up people.

    19. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL - I would bring it up but as many know I'm a Windowz developer and a soon to be OS X developer but I gave up on Linux (and Open Source, for non-trivial applications) for the most part. :-)

    20. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you get in trouble with the law, forget about the show trial. Just kill yourself right away, especially if you're the wrong race! Even if you do get exonerated, double jeopardy is rampant. In 10 years, you'll probably commit suicide, so like I said, just get it over with quickly with a bullet to the head rather than by slashing your wrists, hanging yourself or swallowing broken glass.

      But make sure you're careful about how you shoot yourself or you could wind up in one of Brazil's hospitals!

  38. What Microsoft gift? It's public works! by noshellswill · · Score: 1

    Since the Feds (CIA, FBi, NSA ...) own Microsoft and the bugs that ride in with them, consider this not a gift to the Big Easy, but a public works project.

  39. slashdot category! qjkx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see, science/technology, libertarianism, and "information wants to be free". 3rd!

  40. plans to make money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Meffert met again several days later with Microsoft executives at the company's sales and marketing conference in New Orleans to discuss the prospect of jointly developing and marketing software for other cities and municipalities."

    Looks like the city plans to make some moeny from all this.

  41. does it make a difference if it is a gift? by ehackathorn · · Score: 1

    From the summary:

    Open bidding's taken care of too: "Because these services are considered a gift, the city won't have to publicly bid the project."

    I was under the impression that government agencies had fairly strict rules regarding the acceptance of gifts from companies that they do business with or plan on doing business. Perhaps the fact that it's a "gift" takes care of the open bidding requirement, but I think it's still violates the law. Does anyone have more information?

    1. Re:does it make a difference if it is a gift? by gilroy · · Score: 3, Informative
      Blockquoth the poster:

      I was under the impression that government agencies had fairly strict rules regarding the acceptance of gifts from companies that they do business with or plan on doing business.


      Actually, it's a conceptual loophole. Gifts to individual civil servants are banned. Gifts to the agency as a whole usually are not -- it's considered the act of a public benefactor. Hah!
  42. So the first shot is free by jelle · · Score: 2

    The first shot is free, but that is just to get you hooked on it. Once you're hooked, prices go through the roof and they will take everything you have.

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  43. Article light on details by Kilmor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is microsoft going to "give" them software And hardware, or just a bunch of software?
    "Upgrading Systems" isnt a very clear term.

    IF they are giving them a bunch of hardware And software, hey no problem, let them spend the $$, and they can just say to microsoft in X years, "Oh sorry, we actually broke bid laws since we Do end up paying you, so, we cant pay you. Oh, and those systems are critical to our police doing their job, you cant have them back. What, you would cripple an entire city's ability to fight crime?! ::calls new outlets::"

    If its just software, then , well, Is there even anything Like this being done in the *nix world ?

    from the article : "New Orleans police will be using a system Microsoft developed for the state of Oklahoma. Dubbed the Offender Data Information System, the system can link dozens of law enforcement agencies, jails and court systems. A virtual crime-fighting tool, the system also provides officers with online mug shots of suspects, warrants and other data. In Oklahoma, the system is expected to expand into accident reporting, video arraignment and automated pawn-shop-ticket tracking. "

  44. My Concern by lewp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Isn't Microsoft cutting it a bit close? A penny more and they'd be overcharging.

    --
    Game... blouses.
  45. Why New Orleans is doing this by localroger · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Much as I hate Microsoft, I have to admit this is a smart move on Nagin's part. What the linked article fails to point out is the nature of the system Microsoft is replacing -- an antediluvian mainframe system whose contractor has kept getting the nod because of entrenched patronage since, literally, the days when Elvis was alive. It doesn't mention the death threats (!) which members of the Nagin administration received when they started inquiring about the computer contract.

    Basically, Nagin got elected on a platform of cleaning up the corruption and he'd sign a contract with the Devil himself to get rid of the current scumbags. Wait, he actually did just do that. Well, I for one can't blame him under the circumstances.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
    1. Re:Why New Orleans is doing this by 1010011010 · · Score: 2


      Heh. The cycle of life in New Orleans turns again... out with the old scumbags, in with the new...

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:Why New Orleans is doing this by nemski · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This is a no brainer, especially in New Orleans writes up the contract correctly. As a consultant, we would be up the creek in a similar situation. Sure payment may be due at the end of a project, but when you mess up or don't deliver what was expected, the poop hits the fan. New Orleans is absolutely doing the right thing here, I just hope they had good lawyers in the beginning; if not, they'll have to have them when everything is complete.

      --
      Some people have a way with words, others not have way.
    3. Re:Why New Orleans is doing this by PMuse · · Score: 1

      If there is no long-term contract requiring New Orleans to buy Microsoft for more than the next 10 years or so, seems OK to me given New Orleans' present predicament. (Why 10 years? Because nothing as big as New Orleans can afford to change information infrastructures any faster than that anyway.)

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    4. Re:Why New Orleans is doing this by PMuse · · Score: 1

      I infer that avoiding a bidding process assists the mayor in avoiding the power of the entrenched/corrupt interests.

      Nevertheless, the notion that the city can undertake an obligation today to buy software later, but not need to bid out the contract is bogus.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    5. Re:Why New Orleans is doing this by Xenographic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Isn't doing about what they're doing now how they got into trouble in the first place?

    6. Re:Why New Orleans is doing this by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

      Meet the new boss . . . same as the old boss . . .

      (there, now this should get modded up "+1 Who Reference")

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    7. Re:Why New Orleans is doing this by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you have said... Also, its not as if a LINUX company offered to upgrade the network for free. I'm sure if one did, they would have accepted THAT offer. Microsoft just beat them to it.

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    8. Re:Why New Orleans is doing this by meschman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the entrenched contractor on the mainframe? those were all city employees. the contractor on the novell network, which has been highly effective for 4+ years, and has the best cost-benefit ratio in the city, [not my company, my isp, dsi at http://www.dsi-us.com] is out too, without review or prior notice.

      all the troubles in new orleans stem 100% from circumventing the public procurement process.
      if that stops, everything else will be able to work itself out.

      this is exactly how crooked people in new orleans operate.

      and the idea that a new effort in IT will be costless is suspect, it smells upwind.

  46. Capital Lease != free by Idou · · Score: 1

    Gee, if they used Linux, it would be free FOREVER.

    Someone should explain the difference to the mayor.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
    1. Re:Capital Lease != free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!11 HA!! YUO AER TEH FUNNAY!!!!

      Capital lease? I much prefer capital letters, especially when I try to sound like I'm yelling.

  47. All true... by Badanov · · Score: 1

    But consider this: With news security holes being discovered every day, a man could get arrest, released and with the proper contacts, have his record expunged the next day. It is a glorious time for New Orleans organized crime now that they have a government they can work with: a governemnt using MS products.

    --
    Dawn of the Dead
    1. Re:All true... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick, the downtown precinct main server has BSODed, let's go raid the bank!!

  48. Psssst! Hey! Kid! by mtec · · Score: 1

    first one's free...

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  49. A corollary to buyer beware for New orleans... by Badanov · · Score: 1

    Wait'll you see the bill!

    --
    Dawn of the Dead
  50. Enough Rope to Hang Themselves by lildogie · · Score: 2

    New Orleans wants to be a sacrificial lamb.

    They can take Microsoft down a notch when they crash.

    How many people are going to mourn either of the co-victims? Not many, I'll wager.

  51. And Tim's Bitching about Open Source's Behavior? by edward.virtually@pob · · Score: 1

    As this makes clear, the idea that Open Source supporters are wrong to demand that governments justify failures to use Open Source is moronic. Microsoft will stop at nothing to sell its overpriced, underpowered, insecure software and lock in its proprietary infrastructure. The Open Source movement will be lucky to slow it down.

  52. How could by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    something you eventually have to buy be a gift? Sounds to me more like a loan!

  53. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  54. report unclear by Raiford · · Score: 1
    It's not a gift if you have to pay for it whether you pay now or later. The article just said "eventually" being unclear if the initial installation is actually free or upgrades would have to be paid for. The term "miniscule" was used to describe the price. Upgrades are not necessarily "miniscule" unless they are offsetting costs by some strange formula to account for using the city in their marketing.

    What are the legal implications of software licensing for software that is a gift ? If the software is normally sold and you give it as a gift does that affect your license ?

    --
    "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
  55. Elvis Technology by echophase · · Score: 1

    "The systems that we are using right now . . . Elvis was still alive and singing when they were made," he said. So Elvis sang while the computers were being made... I guess this makes their strange decision a bit clearer. Someone needs to tell the mayor Mardi Gras is over and he can stop drinking.

  56. Where is the Gift? by MeNeXT · · Score: 2

    There is no gift here...This is a bribe... If this were a gift, there would be no other obligation. In other words no future payments required.

    --
    DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. A Crash Could Erase Key Data? by giantsfan89 · · Score: 1
    Quoth the Article:
    • The New Orleans Police Department uses a system that holds 1 million records and is in imminent danger of meltdown, city officials said. Backup copies of most records exist on paper, but a crash could erase key data.

    My question is if they want to prevent a crash, why are they looking into Windows?

    What color would you like your blue screen today?

    --
    Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
  59. The Mayor of New Orleans is an ASSHOLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mayor of New Orleans is an asshole. This is the same guy that spends MILLIONS of dollars to recruit an NBA team (Charlotte Hornets) and build an arena for them, while at the same time schools across the city are in shambles. For christs' sake, there aren't enough books to go around in classrooms! This guy is being RUN by corporate interests. How gullible can one be?

  60. OMG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not Oklahoma, Micky$oft you stay the hell out of my state...

    1. Re:OMG!!! by johnnyb · · Score: 2

      They've already taken us over, dude. Tulsa City is the worst.

    2. Re:OMG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, I was making a delivery to justice yvonne at the state capital building... but since justices are so freaking lazy they are out all day on fridays. So anyway, I went into another justice's office looking for _someone_ to give this delivery to and I saw something and got pissed..

      I don't know what justice this office belonged to since no one was there, but it was the door left on yvonne's. Anyway... there was only one plaque/award in the entire office. It was from Microsoft thanking them for helping out with the Windows 2000 rapid deployment program.

      Why would someone in the judical system be so proud of an award that...

      A) Was given to them because they bought a lot of stuff.

      B) Was given to them from _CONVICTED_ criminals.

      I hate oklahoma...

  61. Expect more of this by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has shown through its history that they do whatever it takes to maintain or increase their market share. In the government sector they have everything to loose. How do you explain a tax-payer that her/his money is used for paying huge license costs to run microsoft software, when similar (and in many cases better) software is available for f***g free ?. And, in particular, in the US, how do you explain that this money goes to the company proved to be a monoply by yourself (the government) ?.(there are several other excellent reasons for a government switch to free software which are perhaps harder to explain to an average -as opposed to geek- person).

    Microsoft know all of this and will do whatever it takes to keep their grip in the government. Expect more "donations", cost cuts, etc. They will not just sit there and see how their empire falls down ...

  62. Gillette springs to mind. by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

    Get the razor almost free and then buy razorblades at a high price.

    We will be seeing alot more like this in the future. I think Microsoft gladly loose money if they can keep linux off government and cities.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  63. That's why its called the Big Easy by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

    New Orleans gov't has always been filled with corruption so Microsoft will find it quite easy to work a deal that's bad for the city in the long run yet good for the politicians who are currently in office. Its one of the main reasons that I had to leave the city to start off - that and the fact that there exist NO IT market within the city at all. Somewhat difficult to have intelligent computer people lobby against free software when they've moved to other cities to find jobs. But such is the way of things.

  64. The gift that keeps on taking... by gnovos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One must wonder just what the Mayor would say to a free gift of Redhat with NO contract to buy in the future? Someone living in New Orleans may want to offer such a gift.

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  65. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  66. The same politicians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That spent millions of public funds to lure the Charlotte Hornets into their city while schools are in shambles. Yeah, you got it.

  67. Microsoft is selling an application here by Animats · · Score: 2
    What Microsoft is marketing here is an application for law enforcement. (Oklahoma's site for the system is here. Requires Internet Exploder and Windows Media Player, of course.) It's a web-based system with a back-end database, servelets, and browser-based components. What Microsoft calls "DNA", or tries to portray as part of ".NET". From the description, it's not a particularly elaborate application; it sounds like a medium-sized, but unimpressive, Visual Basic job.

    It's surprising that Microsoft is bothering with Government applications. The margins aren't that big. That field has usually been addressed by companies that did mostly Government work, like EDS, Unisys, and the government business unit of IBM. This may reflect a major strategy change for Microsoft, moving towards owning the customer in the classic IBM way, with lots of Microsoft people onsite at the customer location.

    1. Re:Microsoft is selling an application here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to odisok.net
      Software and support for the odis project are offered
      free of charge.
      But the city must supply, at a minimum the following,
      network server, tape backup drive, backup tapes, modem,
      network and database software, client access licenses, network cabling,
      hub, digital camera, and printer.
      This system sounds like the same thing used at companies
      that have security picture ids for employees.
      -
      -
      Sounds to me like we have a manager that is going to
      run the 'machine' at full tilt with 0 maintenance right
      up until the whole shebang blows up. Of course by
      then the new administration will be in office and
      it will not be nagels problem.

    2. Re:Microsoft is selling an application here by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's not surprising at all.

      Microsoft needs to expand beyond business, because there's not that much farther they can go WITHIN business. On the one hand BSA work, on the other hand this. Microsoft are getting into government and this is the most obvious move in the world.

  68. Just like Apple and schools by fsandford · · Score: 1

    Why do our kids have to deal with a non standard computing system in our schools? Because at one time Apple gave them to them, pay later, yes.

    1. Re:Just like Apple and schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It *is* a standard computing platform, just not your standard, you fucking twit.

  69. Can you blame them? by swestbrook · · Score: 1

    To be honest, can you really blame New Orleans? They obviously have found that they really need to replace their antiquated system. At the same time, Microsoft offered to develop software and make sure it works for free for now. Yes, New Orleans might have to give money to Microsoft in the future, but given budgetary constraints, efficient use of taxpayer money and other concerns, it is probably a good deal for New Orleans. You have to realize that the politicians need to get something done in this current term of office.... money that must be spent two or three terms from now is not important.

    1. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago Bill Joy gave a talk where he
      discussed the "vendor motel" -- "Once you check
      in you never check out!"

      New Orleans is about to check into the Microsoft
      motel.

    2. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you really blame New Orleans? Yes, this project
      should be open for bidding.

  70. Big Easy's Servers: A Reef by Peahippo · · Score: 1

    The article claimed that the city's CTO will make N.O. a "city of the future". This is clearly ironic since N'awlins has no future at all. Louisiana's protective coastline around New Orleans loses 35 square miles every year from constraining the Mississippi River from dropping a silt load over the entire delta. When the next hurricane actually hits the Big Easy -- the last couple have come close -- the storm swell will top the levees, will utterly drown the city, will kill tens of thousands of people (as projected), and $50 billion will disappear from the US economy from the catastrophe.

    So, who cares what OS is running on those servers? Run Windows XT and Oracle DB using excess licenses from California. They'll be under water anyways, and everybody can write off the loss of software that was useless to begin with. On that note, right now the Louisiana state government should be swapping out servers in New Orleans, putting their older, crappy hardware in place for the write-off. W00t!

    --
    [also misbehaves on Kuro5hin as Peahippo]
    1. Re:Big Easy's Servers: A Reef by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like they can use all of those old computers
      out on the coast to slow down erosion.

  71. Could Open Source Do This? by reallocate · · Score: 2

    Some points:

    1. A sneaky deal? Sounds like it, but Microsoft does represent computers to the 99.99 percent of the population that doesn't read Slashdot.

    2. Sneaky deals and monopolism aside, the simple fact that Microsoft is a corportation allows them to speak with one voice and make a coherent proposal that has a real chance of being implemented.

    3. So...how could the free software/open sourcee world do the same thing? How could a similar wall-to-wall open source solution be offered to New Orleans? Does such an institution exist, or is the notion antithetical to the community?

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Could Open Source Do This? by johnnyb · · Score: 2

      Any service organization could do this. I'm working part-time with one who is getting into just this.

      All of the software is there, and you just hire a solutions company to put it all together for you. It certainly isn't rocket science.

  72. This is terrible reporting! by intnsred · · Score: 1
    The Times-Picayune's article is the word kind of cheerleading masquerading as "new reporting." Let the article's author know how you feel.

    My attempt:

    I found your article "City may get free Microsoft makeover" amusing, in a sad sort of way. Your omissions seemed to speak more than your words.

    There was not one word of the irony of the city working out a deal with a convicted, unrepentant monopolist corporation in upgrading the city's police department. Surely that should have been mentioned.

    Nor was there any real data on what the "minuscule" software upgrade costs would be in the future. Instead, you just used the "minuscule" quote and presented it as a fact. Anyone who has dealt with Microsoft's licensing on any significant scale knows these upgrade costs are wildly excessive and over a short time are far more expensive than the software's initial license fees.

    The entire aspect of this being a "gift" was not questioned. Nor was the fact that public data will be locked up in secret, proprietary file formats that only Microsoft knows. The fact that this "gift" will lock the city into Microsoft software and make any future migration away from Microsoft software very expensive was never mentioned.

    And moreover, there was not one word about Microsoft's legendary security problems and whether the officials involved had even considered these problems when linking together many different government agencies which contain huge amounts of personal/private data.

    To me, the article was simply "feel good" cheerleading; this is hardly the role the public expects the media to play. Your article wasn't objective nor did it try to do even a minimal amount of investigation. Shame on you.

    1. Re:This is terrible reporting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      intnsred wrote (to the Times-Picayune): To me, the article was simply "feel good" cheerleading; this is hardly the role the public expects the media to play. Your article wasn't objective nor did it try to do even a minimal amount of investigation. Shame on you.

      Not surprising. Disappointing, yes. But not surprising. What passes for "news," "journalism" and "reporting" these days is a joke. A sad joke, but a joke nonetheless. The traditional, dominant media criticize what's on the 'net for being biased, ill-researched, riddled with mis-truths, etc., when, in fact, that very same traditional, dominant media is rife with the same problems. This example is especially glaring, however. Here is a slam-dunk story if ever there was one. And the paper just blows it off. Ought to give the paper's subscribers an idea of the "quality" of the rest of its "reporting," no?

      I hope and pray that should my local government and Microsoft (or any other company, for that matter), attempt a similar stunt, my local paper will do a better job of it. In fact: while I frequently disagree with my local newspaper's editorial position on certain issues, I suspect they're better than that excuse for a "news"paper New Orleans is stuck with.

  73. So what by i_luv_linux · · Score: 0
    So what is wrong with this. It is a company who makes business.

    Every company does that, discounts, free upgrades and so on. What is wrong with that.

  74. TROLL alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some????
    Try all their software from microsoft.
    front end
    back end
    everything

    1. Re:TROLL alert by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, he's right it did say some.

      From the article:

      "Eventually, he added, the city will have to purchase software from the company, but he said it would be a "minuscule" expense."

      It never said "THE" software; the slashdot story is misleading... what a surprise.

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

  75. 2K IS stable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to those that think W2K isn't stable, but I've yet to have W2K BSOD or hard lock on me yet. W2K is many times better than NT 4, and NT 4 SP6a ran very very well for me. Choosing the right hardware and drivers is key. Any competent Sys Admin should be able to keep his boxes running smooth within reason. I am the Sys Admin in a mixed environment comprised of Windows 95, 98, NT 4, 2K, Macintosh, NetWare, AS/400 and Linux. The business I work for demands near-24/7/365 availability. I deliver that. If I could just get Win9x and the Macs outta here, things would be better.

    Sure I use Linux in my spare time at home, but in business, Windows just dominates for general workstation and server usage. Many slashdot readers need to grow up and realize how businesses work. The goal of business is to make a profit, and preferably make a profit that matches or exceeds what is budgeted.

    This is Microsoft's way to show people how an effective use of their products is going to help the city. Believe it not folks, MS wants to make money, they are a business.

    1. Re:2K IS stable by BoysDontCry · · Score: 1

      There's no doubt in my mind that Windows dominates in general workstation usage, but Linux rules in the server market. It's cheaper, more stable, more secure, and more configurable. Sure, W2K is a lot more stable than previous versions of Windows, but I HAVE YET to see Linux lock up or fail to meet my server needs. Why settle for W2K when you can have all you need in a server for free with Linux?

    2. Re:2K IS stable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the dumbass walked into a store to look at the goods
      offered. He soon realized that everything in the store
      was several times more expensive that similar merchandise
      he had seen at another establishment.
      The dumbass asked the clerk why everything was so
      expensive, and the clerk told the dumbass that the
      store had to charge such high prices or they would not
      be able to make a profit.
      And the dumbass thought to himself,
      'That sounds fair' as he handed the clerk his credit
      card.
      -
      You sir are a dumbass.

    3. Re:2K IS stable by i_luv_linux · · Score: 0
      I agree with you, until then some silly slashdot guys will amuse themselves.

      I also personally like Linux, because it allows me to learn programming and so on. Open source is a great thing and it should be always there. But before making wrong claims about what it can do and it can not do, they have to consider how a business runs. Profitability is the key reason, and that is the only reason why business people are interested in linux and open source.

  76. A tried and tested strategy by Aliks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Big computer companies have been using this tactic for decades.

    You want to enter a marketplace? First problem is you haven't got a reference site so noone will take you seriously.

    So you buy yourself a reference site and shower them with goodies to make sure the software, hardware and services all hang together. Now you can go to other related businesses with a credible offer.

    For this to work, the vendor has to have deep enough pockets to make the showcase site a success, and time enough to do the job properly. Secondly the marketplace has to be broad enough to replicate the showcase to a goodly number of real paying customers.

    Nothing wrong here, quite the reverse, it's good business to invest time and effort on satisfying customer demand.

    This sort of strategy is popular in the public sector, with regional governments and the like. They all have broadly similar requirements, and are strapped for cash, so that someone will likely be prepared to take the risk of being the trial site. I have also seen it work in smaller banks, the ones who can't really afford to develop new solutions in house.

    The upside for the vendor is that you get a pretty much captive market: the customer can't usually afford to pay for any alternative system. This means that you can sell them related services at a premium rate year after year.

    The downside is that the margins are hit initially, after all you had to buy the business. Further, if the target marketplace is not actually as homogeneous as you thought, then there can be expensive customisation required for new clients. They won't take the offering just as a package so the perceived risk and cost goes up, meaning that your expensive reference site is not quite so compelling.

    The downside for the customer comes when the vendor's pockets aren't so deep, and they are in a hurry for profit.

    There are quite a few spins on this strategy, the worst of which is "break the customer's leg and then sell them a splint". In other words, you get 6 months into the project before revealing that there are significant "special" problems that can be blamed on the customer. These "problems" are outside the scope of the original agreement and the customer has to write some cheques to cover it. 6 months later, new unexpected problems crop up . . . .

    Well MS has the deep pockets for this kind of work, but they are in a hurry. Tough call to decide whether it's good business or not.

  77. Already . . . by Idou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the "marketing model to push this on the rest of the country" part of the contract has kicked in, you mean?

    Bet New Orleans gets burned on this deal sometime in the next 5 years;) see ya back at /. then.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  78. With microsoft's prices by thelinuxking · · Score: 1

    I would definitely consider letting Microsoft upgrade MY software for free...

  79. Business as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The three largest industries for Louisiana are tourism, oil, and graft, and not in that order. A few years ago there was one murder per day in New Orleans; in the French Quarter they put up a sign with cardboard cutouts on hooks for numbers. It stopped when they found out that a couple of local police had been going into convenience stores, killing everyone, and taking the cash.

  80. What's next? by Xformer · · Score: 1

    ...and 5 minutes after the traffic control systems are "upgraded" by Microsoft, a BSoD graces the monitor and every traffic light in the city turns green.

    --
    All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
    1. Re:What's next? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      after the traffic control systems are "upgraded" by Microsoft, a BSoD graces the monitor and every traffic light in the city turns green.

      I used to work on traffic light programming. (There is more to it than you might think - variable delays depending on time of day/traffic volumes, under-the-street detector loops, transponders for emergency vehicles, you-name-it.)

      It is physically impossible to get a four-way green on a traffic light. As a completely separate unit in each traffic controller is a conflict monitor that is hooked up to the physical power outputs to the green lights on the poles. If a conflict is detected, the watchdog trips an emergency override and the lights automatically go to four-way red or red/yellow flash at the programmer's option. It is a safety regulation that these watchdog timers must be physically tested every so often too, using a simple insulated wire with probes on the end. Touch the probes to the opposing green contacts, *click*.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    2. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New traffic lights will eliminate the conflict monitor in favor of the Windows system, just like that Windows based battleship eliminated all manual controls in favor of a single Win2k box.

  81. New Orleans own fault. by halftrack · · Score: 2

    I truly don't have a problem with Microsoft should supply New Orleans with software. On the other hand I don't like the way it's done this time, at all.

    Microsoft is here trapping New Orleans in a slick way and the mayor of New Orleans is obviously terribly short sighted and porly informed. The problem in any government, county, municipial etc. is that technical decitions are made by politicians or poorly educated/bribed advisors and not by well educated consultans with a broad software experience.

    --
    Look a monkey!
  82. Re:Open Source QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know why I despise christians. They keep moralizing and thumping their bibles crying "thou shalt not kill", but man, when they really want to kill someone, they have the PR.

    What the hell? Who brought religion into this? You have serious bigotry issues. Oh wait, I forgot... you're a compassionate soul. Well, compassionate for criminals, at least.

  83. Someone has to say it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I send you this free software in order to have your advice.

  84. Support... by ergean · · Score: 1

    "The carrot for them is that they can work with an actual city to develop this system," Meffert said. "They were extremely excited."

    Does that mean there is a stick?

    Probably they'll get more from support and upgrades. They're killing three rabbits (the comptetitors, model to showoff and one less city using non-microsoft products) with one bullet.

  85. Hypocritical? by no_nicks_available · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this was Redhat doing this it would be praised.

    1. Re:Hypocritical? by de_rus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A little, yes.

      But i guess nobody fears a RedHat lock-in.
      If after some time NO decides they want to move on, they could choose from several other vendors and keep using the same open source applications, with all their data intact, and in open formats.

    2. Re:Hypocritical? by bharlan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Redhat has not been convicted of violating
      the Sherman Antitrust Act.

      --
      (Reality reasserts itself sooner or later.)
    3. Re:Hypocritical? by Dragonshed · · Score: 1

      There's a reason the Microsoft topic icon is bill gates with borg implants. And I believe that reason is because he's a child of satan sent to destroy the earth, one BSOD at a time :P

    4. Re:Hypocritical? by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      If this was Redhat doing this it would be praised.

      There is a big difference between Microsoft and <insert software company here>. Microsoft has worked very hard to set themselves apart from everyone else, and they are getting the respect they have earned.

      Last I checked, RedHat is, for the most part, still GPL. RedHat lock-in is harder to achieve.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    5. Re:Hypocritical? by I'm+Don+Giovanni · · Score: 1

      "There's a reason the Microsoft topic icon is bill gates with borg implants."

      Indeed there is a reason: The childishness of those running this site.

      --
      -- "I never gave these stories much credence." - HAL 9000
    6. Re:Hypocritical? by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Red Hat is not a beligerant monopoly.

  86. It's very admirable of Microsoft... by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

    ...to pick the leat corrupt city in the whole of the US as their starting point.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  87. attn: poster is a liar! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no such thing as a "Sys Admin" for Windows. If you work with Windows you have no business calling yourself a Systems Administrator.

  88. The Real Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So many inept comments.

    I live in New Orleans, and the reason for such an offer is simply one man: Greg Meffert.

    He has been appointed Mayor Ray Nagin's CTO.

    No one else in City Hall really does technology, so the idea that it's "stupid politicians" is ridiculous.

    Meffert is respnsible for getting City Hall online, really, with online business forms, taxes, etc. People don't like change here, and there is great resentment, believe it or not.

    But there is again no one else really in place at City Hall to make a choice for open source. Meffert also headed the largest software company in New Orleans, so there's noone else to really tell him or Nagin how to do things.

    The Open Source solution looks bleak.

    However, if anyone is truely concerned, one can send a well written propsal here.

    Funny, knowing the inside story and seeing the comments under this post, I can only wonder how others feel when they know the story, and there streams in comment after comment of same-a-thon logic and peer modeling.

    Anyway, send in a request! Get New Orleans to Linux! I can only do so much!

    Thanks.

    1. Re:The Real Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did a search on the guy and came up with a lot of
      good stuff.
      Thanks for the lead in.
      wwltv.com

  89. Microsoft now using the tactics of drug-dealers? by Mordant · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked, shocked.

  90. Does the longterm really matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sure, they're picking up a software package for free, initially. And as stated, it is a software package, not an OS upgrade or hardware. And as much as I support the OpenSource advocates, as far as I'm aware, there are no criminal information tracking systems on Sourceforge at the moment.

    But as with all Microsoft products, they're definately not a once-buy solution. Will the city be paying for upgrades, support, disaster recovery? With Microsofts current licensing movements, they'll probably be paying a yearly leasing fee in a couple of years.

    But thats the point, a couple of years. How long do political administrations usually last? The majority of the people involved in the decision will probably be consulting for large companies in a couple of years.

  91. Dumb, Dumb, Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You idiot, it is the doing of a "well educated consultant with a broad software experience".

    Study up before you write, sheep.

    1. Re:Dumb, Dumb, Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      MSCEs don't qualify.
      lamb

  92. Good Samaritan or a wolf in a sheep's clothing? by Dexter77 · · Score: 1

    Software choice, free computers, donation to Peru, etc.. now we can forget all the bad things M$ has ever done, they sure have turned good, or have they?

    In the 80's I remember stories where Microsoft sent a teenager into a computer store complaining that he has lost his mouse driver. A goodwilled sales clerk of course took a copy of the drivers from one of their DOS packages. Few hours later M$ lawyer was at the door..

    Maybe the younger generation will see only the good deeds Microsoft has done.
    I anyway won't ever trust M$..

  93. Shouldn't they be a bit wary of this? by BoysDontCry · · Score: 1

    My mother always said "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is." In this case, they should listen to my mother. A deal that says "It's all free now, but you'll have to pay down the road" doesn't sound reasonable to me. I really hope that they look at the long-term effects of this decision, and look at all of the options. This reminds me of all of those commercials that say "No money down until 2003". What happens when I/we start having to pay?

  94. Norl'ans always was an open town. by crovira · · Score: 2

    Now M$ gets to have a base of operation where the officials are officially corrupt (I know an ex-Nor'leans cop,) and where chyrrosis of the liver is death by natural causes.

    They can stop worrying about those pesky revenuers now.

    You buy "Boudreau" or "Thibodeau", real cheap, and they stays bought as long as you can pay. I ga-ron-tee eet.

    Think of it as "SeaLand" [http://www.sealandgov.com/] without the kiddie-porn restrictions.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  95. Nagin is cleaning New Orleans up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  96. What is "a similar Microsoft" Timothy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn to read and write English you fucking moron!

    1. Re:What is "a similar Microsoft" Timothy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you've really contributed to the overall discussion.

  97. Worse than we thought by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

    Quote from the story:
    "a similar Microsoft developed for Oklahoma..."

    Wasn't a single Microsoft enough?? They are now developing another one????

    --
    ^_^
  98. I love the headlines here by Metaldsa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Microsoft Sinks Teeth Into New Orleans"

    with a counter headline being something like

    "Linux wins over hearts and souls of Germany"

    Its just business, leave the emotions at the door if you want to perform your best. Microsoft did in 1981 and if linux wants a bigger market they will too.

  99. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Small dick, stupid post.

  100. Re: Take a lesson from musical instrument sales by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    This whole thing reminds me of a rather parallel situation that goes on all the time in the musical instrument sales business.

    A small manufacturer develops a great new product, and starts working on building a customer-base for it.

    Along comes a music "superstore" such as Guitar Center or Mars. They woo the manufacturer, saying "Hey, we absolutely *love* your new product and want to carry it in all of our stores. We'll make you a really sweet deal, paying you X amount each with a guarantee that we'll buy at least 40,000 units up-front, and thousands per month after that!"

    Of course, the little manufacturer thinks "Wow, how can I go wrong? This is the break I was looking for!" They proceed to spend large amounts of investment money to ramp up production to meet the needs of the music superstore and everything looks great.

    That is - until the contract comes up for renewal. Then the story changes. "Hey pal, we're not really making much money off this product of yours. If you don't start selling them to us for under price Y, we'll just quit carrying it and go with a competitor." All of a sudden, the small manufacturer realizes he's stuck in a permanent marriage with the music superstore, and pretty much on *their* terms.

  101. Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't spend millions, the team was already a done deal when he got into office.

    Further, you can't fix schools in 100 days.

  102. more junk, less privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the citizens of New Orleans will also receive free gifts, like tons of junkmail and more spam. the city plans on selling names and addresses of its citizens to advertisers for monetary gain. i'm glad i'm not gonna be in their new database.

  103. Why this is a problem... by symbolic · · Score: 2


    Consider the rhetoric here:

    "a city of the future" (hype)
    "miniscule expense" (no evidence)
    "$100 million savings" (no evidence)
    "more weapons for fighting crime" (hype)

    This is a political sales pitch, pure and simple, and even worse, it involves an end-run around a process that was designed to protect the public's interest.

    While I agree that cities may have a problem with their current technology, solving it by digging a huge pit, and then slowly burying yourself as a company like M$ begins to extort larger and larger sums of money (in the form of licensing/support agreements, of course), isn't the way to go.

  104. Brain:Are you pondering what I'm pondering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well I'm wondering a couple of things.

    One what OSS tech. is or could be made comparable to what MS is offering.

    Two just how bad is the situation in New Orleans that they have to make such a deal.

    1. Re:Brain:Are you pondering what I'm pondering? by Animats · · Score: 2

      The usual alternative is J2EE, with one of the more reliable open-source databases on the back end.

  105. gift? by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    Open bidding's taken care of too: "Because these services are considered a gift, the city won't have to publicly bid the project." Sounds like dirty pool to me.


    If its legally considered a gift, that means there can be no consideration of future payment involved. They should just take the gift and then later bid it out anyway.

  106. "Sounds like dirty pool to me." by flacco · · Score: 2
    What?! In New Orleans?! That virtuous paragon of civic do-rightitude?

    No way!

    Looks like Microsoft has found its perfect partner in crime.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  107. Idea for RedHat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Sounds like dirty pool to me.

    Well, what's to stop a vendor like RedHat from offering a similar deal?

  108. Keep in mind, anti-Microsoft dead-heads ... by MatrixCubed · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ... New Orleans, being a massively under-technological wonder-city, has *no* obligation to accept the offer from Microsoft. They choose to. They could have looked into Linux, BSD, Apple Mac, C-64 GeOS, or whatever they damn well like. But they didn't. They could have researched its cost effectiveness. But they didn't. They could have spend a month trying different systems and running different distributions of other OS's to find out what best suited their needs. But they didn't.

    See a trend here? The classic Microsoft-hater liturgy: MS "forced" something on someone/a group/a government even though that someone/group/government could have researched otherwise. So now Microsoft is the bad guy. It's called Doing Business. Businesses that eventually die don't evolve, are not self-propogating, and do not try new avenues and ventures in order to magnify their revenues. Businesses that survive, do.

    Perhaps get your heads out of whatever dark smelly hole they're housed in, and realize that this is the way business works. Unless you decide to change the entire American "way", get used to it. Whining about it won't make it better.

    1. Re:Keep in mind, anti-Microsoft dead-heads ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check greg mefferts bank account.
      Look for huge transfers of cash from microsoft.

    2. Re:Keep in mind, anti-Microsoft dead-heads ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just modded you down as "Overrated" but I'd like to take this opportunity to say that I'd have prefered to have modded you "Clueless", that being the opposite of the "insightful" mod class.

  109. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft gives away some free software and the 'Free Software' movement gets all pissy about it. Ain't life a bitch sometimes?

  110. Too bad by bsharitt · · Score: 1

    It's too bad for New Orleans that they can't get Linux or FreeBSD for free somewhere.

  111. No money down! No pmts & interest till next y by Jerry · · Score: 1
    They'll have to pay for it all later, if not sooner. Microsoft's new game plan to beat Open Source GPL software is apparently a page from the Furniture Salesman's Manual. Those ads that make it seems as if the 'customer' is getting something for for very little, or nothing at all.


    But, 'next year' comes around and the interest charges include those prior months and the high monthly bills start rolling in.


    Some people live but some people never learn.

    --

    Running with Linux for over 20 years!

  112. A monopolist isn't allowed to undercut competitors by lowieken · · Score: 1

    Imagine a company selling tires has a 90% market share. Suppose they are convicted monopolists. How would competitors react to this company offering the city police new tires for free for the next five years.
    Would the city even go with this firm, if they knew they were obliged to keep buying these same tires for many years to come afterwards? For the city traffic infrastructure would need to buy from them afterwards...

  113. So you want to pass a law forcing gov't to use OSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but you don't want MSFT to give away its software?

  114. Oughta be a law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's such a good idea, perhaps it should be codified into law. Government shall only use free software. Wait a minute, they're opposed to that.

  115. Re:So you want to pass a law forcing gov't to use by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 1

    The question has never been one of whether the software is free or not but whether the software's souce codes (or at least all data formats) are freely available to the public. IMHO (and I think other's as well) ANY software, except that for defense, that is obtained, for compensation or not, by a public (govenmental) entity should be required to have all of its technical details (souce, formats, protocols etc) available to any citizen within the community in question. Otherwise it makes it that much harder to change in the future and without change there can be no growth. If M$ opens its source then I won't have a problem but until that day comes I think it wise for government to stay divested as much as possible from such sandtraps.

  116. Do you have a link? by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    Do you have a link to this admittedly very interesting backstory?

    1. Re:Do you have a link? by RennieScum · · Score: 3, Informative


      http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=index&cid= 37 8

      One of the local TV stations puts up content on a Yahoo channel, link above. Lots of reading about the Nagin administration's raiding of city hall and all that fun stuff that's been going on here lately as part of the cleanup campaign.

      I'm sure Nagin is getting death threats from many different sources, he's arrested half of city hall by now.

      <flame><offtopic>
      The TP (Times Picayune) is a fine example of the how to not use technology for content. All the newspapers in the area use local "new media" companies to publish their internet content for them. They do a piss poor job. </offtopic></flame>

      --
      ...Time is the best teacher, unfortunately it kills all of its students.
  117. Re:Hmmm...Not good. UN...NO it doesn't by darkPHi3er · · Score: 2
    "It shuts out network OS competition, and it shuts out hundreds of companies that develop applications for cities and governments."

    Nope, reread the article, it doesn't say anything about NOLA being restricted to using ONLY MS products.

    Further, IFF you know anything about MS server products, the consulting and aftermarket business they generate is astonishing.If you're running an MS shop, you will quickly learn the meaning of TCO. And network security. And data redundancy.

    "It *is* a bribe."

    One man's bribe is another man inducement. Whether we're talking about Triple Coupon Day, Zero Dollars Down on a Lexus, Zero Percent Financing on a Chevy or a Free Hot Wax with every Car Wash on Tuesday.

    MS don't have any real position in goverment software systems, so they can't be accused of market domination. That means they're safe from any legal blowback.

    HEY, I HAVE AN IDEA!!!!

    Why doesn't RedHat or Mandrake or Debian make a counter-offer to NOLA to provide them with LINUX systems, tit for tat, for all the services that MS is offering?

    Think what a great headline that would be for LINUX.

    "Entire City of New Orleans goes OpenSource."

    That's how you play and that's how you beat them. Competition. The Amurrican Way.

    BTW, you do realize, don't you, that this is a rather BIG validation of "free software" (small 'f"), and MS has done little in the last few years but tell everyone that "free software is worth what you pay for it.

    Interesting, that they're "giving it away".

    What could that mean? HMMMMMMMM

    --
    Ten quid, she's so easy to blind. And not a word is spoken...
  118. The EXTRA cost to New Orleans.... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2

    Microsoft gives N'Orleans the first one and they have to pay later? Like drug pushers? (First one's free).

    New Orleans has a larger looming problem if they head down this path: the cost of hardware upgrades.

    The problem with tying oneself to M$ is that you need more powerful hardware everytime they release a new version of bloatware.

    If New Orleans can't buy software, how the hell are they going to keep upgrading their hardware with every release?

  119. Very interesting... by TitaniumFox · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine works at the Contemporary Arts Center in New Orleans. One of their revenue streams is renting out their 2nd floor, 3rd floor and warehouse space for parties. Just last month she worked a huge Microsoft party at the CAC. HUGE. XP bloat, huge. Gates was rumored to have been there, althought she didn't see him. I'm thinking she said that numerous city officials were there, though. ...the party after the monumental decision is made, perhaps?

    --
    -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
  120. Completely OT, but... by WowTIP · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Have you even visited a minumum security prison, let alone a maximum security prison? I think death is a huge grace when compared to life in one of these hell holes.

    Yes, you think that ...death is a huge grace... compared to beeing locked up in any kind of prison. Does that mean everyone have to share your point of view? My very uninformed guess is that there are lots of people currently on death row that would rather be in a very high security prison. I guess the opposite isn't that very common. In my not so humble opinion it is not the matter of any state to decide whether it's citizens are to live or die. Recognize this quote?

    Deserves it! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends.

    Who? A fictional character called Gandalf (Well, Tolkien), speaking of another fictional character called Gollum. Still it is one of the best all-time quotes imo.

    --

    --

    "I'm surfin the dead zone
    In the twilight, unknown"
    1. Re:Completely OT, but... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      I don't give a fuck if they're put to death or kept in sentence for life, as long as they're not a drain on my tax budget. As it stands though, it's cheaper for me, the taxpayer, to kill a convicted murderer than it is to pay for his life in prison. Since I'm the one paying the taxes, it should be my decision.

      Again, I don't care which is the better, or more humane way to deal with convicted criminals. I care about my own welfare above theirs, and don't see the point in wasting my tax dollars to sustain their lives, when it isn't contributing anything back to "the community".

      -9mm-

    2. Re:Completely OT, but... by Edgy+Loner · · Score: 2

      Since I'm the one paying the taxes, it should be my decision.
      ...

      I care about my own welfare above theirs, and don't see the point in wasting my tax dollars to sustain their lives, when it isn't contributing anything back to "the community".

      Excellent!! So I get to pull the switch on everybody in state run nursing homes and state hospitals?
      I guess if you can't pull your weight it's time to suck the pipe.

      Do you even try to think about what you're saying?

    3. Re:Completely OT, but... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      I have given quite a bit of thought to what I said. That said, color me as evil as you like, but I don't see where it's my responsibility to pay for state run nursing homes and hospitals, and I don't honestly understand why they should necessarily exist.

      This is not to say that I don't understand WHY they're there, but to say that I don't agree with why they're there. Also, for the record, I don't agree with state-run homeless shelters, soup kitchens, dog pounds, and (oooh, here's a biggie) schools. I don't see why my taxes should pay for them, or, to restate it, I don't see why someone (for example) who doesn't have any children should have to pay property taxes that go towards schools.

      Yes, I am a parent, and I'm perfectly prepared to send them to private schools and / or pay for their schooling altogether. If I had the choice, it would be the tax dollars that I didn't spend that would (at least in part) fund my daughter's education.

      -9mm-

    4. Re:Completely OT, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh... my... Gosh... people like this exist FOR REAL? The whole concept of taxes is not to pay for exactly what you use, but it's to better society (which is in your interest if you can't figure that out).

    5. Re:Completely OT, but... by tshak · · Score: 1

      I don't see how someone who rapes, tortures, and murders your wife is even allowed to have a point of view at that point.

      And you Tolkien quote is well taken. I have a huge respect for him (moreso for his theology then his fictional writings) and he brings up part of the struggle between justice for society and justice for the criminals.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    6. Re:Completely OT, but... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      Forgive me if I can't see the societal benefit of keeping convicted murderers alive on my dollars.

      -9mm-

    7. Re:Completely OT, but... by Ravenn · · Score: 1

      Firstly, I'm replying to this as a parent, too. I don't wish these sort of incidents on anybody, but I use them as examples from real circumstances I have known, to prove a point.

      What if you were to lose your job? What if you're wife became sick, and you had to either stay home and care for her, or hire someone to do that? What if the treatment was very expensive? There goes any money for your children's schooling...

      Would you then keep your kids home, just so they don't drain the taxpayer-funded state schools?

      What you are saying is that the children of the poor don't deserve an education. Or maybe that the poor people shouldn't be allowed to have children at all. Is that correct?

      What if you had a situation where your daughter ran away. Say she was being abused and felt she couldn't tell you. Would you have her starve on the streets, eventually selling herself for food? How much do you think a 13 year old girl can earn as a prostitute? Or would you rather that she found a shelter to help her get her life back together? I know I'd hate it if it happened to my daughter, but I know where I'd rather her be if that ever happened: a shelter, where she gets (state funded) food and (state funded) shelter, as well as (state funded) councilling.

      That is the point of paying taxes. To fund the entire country. It doesn't always work, or turn out like it's supposed to, but that's just human nature getting in the way. Just like your opinions, everyone has there own.

      The taxes aren't there to drain your pay, but to better your country. In theory, this leads to more jobs and money for everyone, including opportunities for your own children.

      Ravenn

      --
      Of all the things you can accomplish by screwing up your face and swearing into a dark room, sleep is not one of them.
    8. Re:Completely OT, but... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong... I completely understand where you're coming from, and I respect your opinion, and, as things currently are, I respect your right to utilize tax-funded services. That IS what they are there for. I don't think poorly of those on welfare, or those that DO utilize state-funded services, but seriously, if I had the option of either giving them my money or not, then I wouldn't.

      Currently, I have a small-ish nest egg set aside in the event that I do lose my job. I maintain an occupation the provides benefits in the event that I, or my wife or daughter should suffer any "expensive" illnesses. I came from a VERY poor family, with almost no education, much of it home-schooled / tutored, and taught myself literally everything that I know, except that which I was lucky enough to find other people's brains to pick from or that which my parents taught me.

      I don't wish any ill upon those with lesser paystubs, or less ability to get better pay, and understand that especially, in a down economy, things are hard all the way around.

      The bulk of my belief is founded upon the principle that I, with poor education and poor "options in life", born of a proud father who refused welfare even when we needed it, was able to make a living for myself. I'm not rich, by any means, but I do okay for myself.

      Hopefully, I'll raise my daughter in such a manner that she would never feel that she had to run away instead of talking to me. Yeah, I know that this may not be the case, and while I respect that there are shelters out there that take kids in and do good, I don't feel that it's the duty of the government (local, city, state, federal, whatever) to provide them.

      Again, I don't wish any ill on the "have-nots", but having been there, and having worked myself into adult-hood, and been able to escalate my standing in life without a whole lot going for me, I don't see why I should have to help others out. Yes, there was aid for me and my family if I needed it, and yes, there are families out there that I'm sure do need it, but it isn't necessary, and I know that first hand.

      Is my belief selfish? Maybe. Probably even. But I can honestly say that I've gotten where I am today on my own accord, and would hope that others realize that they could as well.

      -9mm-

    9. Re:Completely OT, but... by Ravenn · · Score: 1

      Cool. A good, well thought and intelligent reply, *and* you are logged in. Good to see some people can post these sort of things non-AC.

      I'm pleased to see that you managed to make it like you have, and I wish you the best in raising your kids the same.

      From where I started, I went to a private, catholic school for my secondary education, and still wound up pushing trolleys for 19 months after I finished. I actually would have had a better chance by going to the local state school, where they had a decent music and computer setup, because the private school had less funds and so spent it on sports equipment instead. At least, mostly on sports.

      I'm now 30, and I'm studying at a government funded educational facility (TAFE. Technical And Further Education. Not quite university, but they teach industry-approved courses). I do this on a benefit called Austudy, while my partner in on a parenting payment. Without these, we wouldn't have money for food, clothes, rent, etc.

      One of the advantages of this is something called a health care card, which combines with the government initiative of a medicare card to allow for free (100% free) health care. Whether I have a cold or a broken leg, or for my children's vaccinations. We've had two children, both in public hospitals, without any medical expenses. And only minimal costs for medications.

      Because I paid taxes for many years, I have no issue using some of that to better our lives. I figure that when I finish, I'll be able to get into a much higher tax bracket, so I'll be able to pay more back to society for allowing me to take this time out.

      These days, the cost of living is too high to allow pride to stop you from taking "handouts". While I appreciate your position, I would be unable to provide for my family *and* better my self at the same time. I would be stuck in a warehouse packing boxes, rather than (hopefully) running a company's network.

      Compare this to when my partner and I where just together, where we were pulling in around AU$1,200 a week, after tax. Now we get just over AU$1,000 per fortnight. But the end results are going to be worth it.

      Ravenn

      --
      Of all the things you can accomplish by screwing up your face and swearing into a dark room, sleep is not one of them.
    10. Re:Completely OT, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born in Australia and live in the States now.

      One of the advantages of this is something called a health care card, which combines with the government initiative of a medicare card to allow for free (100% free) health care.

      Free? Oh, no, you *do* pay for it...

      Compare this to when my partner and I where just together, where we were pulling in around AU$1,200 a week, after tax.

      What was it before tax? And, moreover, since the state runs it, who decides how much health care you get?

      Socialized healthcare is *not* cost efficient. My aunt is a hypochondriac. She needs about 10% of the healthcare she gets, and has no incentive to not waste it. So who pays for all the doctor's time she wastes? You do, mate. You pay in two ways:

      You pay more taxes. That's food out of the mouths of your children. That's money out of your pocket.

      You wait in line longer, possibly for an important procedure. Unless, of course, all these inefficiencies pile up and the big evil of socialized health care comes up.

      Rationing.

      When the demand for healthcare is greater than the gov't can supply, it rations. How much is your life worth? Simple: apply the gov'ts formula and you can find out. They will budget x billion dollars, and split it over 10 or so million Australians.

      Once that money is used up... Sorry. Hope you don't die! Great if you're young and healthy!

      I guess life is just like that at times, but doesn't it bother you that there's *nothing* you can do about that? No matter how hard you work, no matter how you save, if you use too much healthcare they'll just have to deny you the necessary operation.

      Oh, unless you're rich, in which case a round trip to the States will cost you about $1500 and there you can purchase the best healthcare money can buy.

    11. Re:Completely OT, but... by Ravenn · · Score: 1

      Quote:
      Free? Oh, no, you *do* pay for it...

      Well, yeah. Eventually. But I don't need to have any more that a few dollars to pay for medications, right now. And when you are sick, it's the *now* that matters.

      People will always take advantage of the freebies, and it causes problems for those that don't. I figure that between you and your aunt, it evens out. Besides, a good doctor would see the pattern, and treat the hyperchondria. Is it her fault if she's being mis-diagnosed?

      Sure, I have to wait for a while. I expect that. But i don't get turned away at the door, or sent a huge bill, just because I need treatment. I am treated. In an emergency situation, I am treated now, and a deal made later. In elective surgery (like my tonsils, which need taking out), I have to either pay now or wait. When I can afford private cover, I will pay. But for now, the public system does quite well.

      I know that John Howard would love to abolish all the public health care system, just as he wants to get rid of the fair dismissal laws. he wants a system where the user pays, all the time. I can see how this makes sense, but only if you actually have the money to make the payments.

      Having been surrounded by druggies who live on the government handouts, having kids just to get more, and abusing the amulance service by ODing 3-4 times a week and then knowing how to not pay up (by not getting into the ambulance), I've seen the sort of people that clog up the system. But I still say that I could't afford to study *and* support my family without the help.

      As for our previous pays, I drove a forklift and was given plenty of overtime, while my partner was a nanny. I can't remember what the gross pay was, but we can't get that any more, anyway. My partner is staying at home to raise our children, rather than shunting them off to care, and I wouldn't want to work 60+ hours a week and miss out on their childhood. Right now, I can study full time and have plenty of time at home. In two years, I can then work full time, once the bond is there.

      Times change. A single wage for the low-end income will no longer pay the bills. We need the payments. I'm bettering my skills so that we can live comfortably. We won't need to be wealthy, but I'm sick of the debts.

      My situation would have been shocking a generation ago. It would have been unheard of 2 generations ago. I hate to think what will happen with society in the next 20-25 years.

      Ravenn

      --
      Of all the things you can accomplish by screwing up your face and swearing into a dark room, sleep is not one of them.
    12. Re:Completely OT, but... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with tax-funded health care. No problem at all. If it were all or nothing, then frankly, I'd have nothing, but all isn't so bad either. The problem I have with "the way things are" currently, is that there are people out there recieving the benefit of my taxes, and are getting state funded health care, and I am not. If I go to the hospital, I am expected to pay. If nobody were expected to pay, then I wouldn't have a problem with it, as it would be entirely governmentally funded at that point. I fear that the quality of health care may decline, but that's a seperate issue altogether.

      Same thing basically goes for welfare. I understand that it is, essentially, to provide those less fortunate with the means to pull themselves up, but, with its current failure rate, I simply can't see why it hasn't been pulled. Rather, I can see why it hasn't been pulled (to keep crime in check in poverty-stricken areas), but don't agree with it. If either everybody or nobody received welfare (and everybody just seems kind of stupid, doesn't it?) then it would be fair to all, whereas it currently isn't.

      Ironically, while I live in the country where you're free to make as much of yourself as you're able (yeah, the US), the more that I make, the more I have to help others up to my level. I fought damn hard to have the meager little life that I have today, and I get a little out of sorts seeing portions of my paycheck handed to those not willing to try as hard.

      As for your "tragedy scenario", honestly, I really hope that I never end up in a situation to have to take welfare from the state. As I stated earlier, I am constantly doing everything I can to prevent it from happening, and while I sit here and staunchly proclaim that I'm "above it", the truth is that, like everybody, if it were take welfare or let my daughter starve to death, I'd likely take the welfare, but the caveat to that statement is that I'm doing everything in my power to ensure that I never need to.

      -9mm-

    13. Re:Completely OT, but... by t0ny · · Score: 0

      The reason they are there is called Public Works. The responsibility of a GOOD (not a corrupt or greedy) government is to look out of the welfare of ALL people, not just the wealthy or influential. If you want that kind of government, maybe you can find the next corrupt shithole the taliban will claim as their own. They didnt go in for all that soup kitchen, public education shit either. You know what else your tax dollars are funding, that you may not agree with? The Centers for Disease Control, and various Public Health Departments. They make sure that harmful pests like rats and mosquitos get killed and wont spread harmful diseases. The public health clinics are there to treat people that cannot afford to go to doctors, so they cant further spread diseases such as HIV, Hepatitis, Tuberculosis, and lots lots more. Soup Kitchens are there so that people who are homeless and starving to death dont kill you for your precious wallet. Shelters are there so homeless people dont have to sleep in alleys and parks. Dog catchers (Animal Control) is there so strays arent running all over the street, tearing up garbage (nice way to increase the rat population), and spread rabies. Public Education is there so that EVERYONE, not just the chosen few, have the oportunity to improve themselves and become productive members of society. Unfortunately, your redneck ass will probably never read this, but your uninformed opinions are obviously based on some backwoods, unthinking conclusions (probably inspired by Rush Limbaugh).

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    14. Re:Completely OT, but... by t0ny · · Score: 0

      Also, I have to add that you have NOT gotten where you are all by yourself. You had help, and didnt even know it. Your taxes provide for a police force that allows you to work and live, for the most part, without fear of bad things happening to you. Has anyone in America's family been kidnapped and sold into slavery? Things like that STILL happen in parts of the world. Another thing your taxes fund is the armed forces. Without having them there, do you think the US would be around as a country very long? Your taxes were also responsible for enforcing laws that create order; this allows you to do things like have a legally enforced claim on real estate, or own a business, or work at a job for an acceptable wage, and with safe working conditions. They have funded things like making sure cars are safe, and get safer (seat belts, air bags? The auto industries fought those). So, I hate to burst your bubble, but you are just getting ahead on the selflessness of other people. Dont complain when selflessness is forced on you; otherwise move to a country that doesnt provide for you like we do. I know I would rather have 75% of something than 100% of nothing.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    15. Re:Completely OT, but... by t0ny · · Score: 0
      Ironically, while I live in the country where you're free to make as much of yourself as you're able (yeah, the US), the more that I make, the more I have to help others up to my level. I fought damn hard to have the meager little life that I have today, and I get a little out of sorts seeing portions of my paycheck handed to those not willing to try as hard.


      Ah, I know a Limbaugh-ite when I smell one. Let me ask you- what exactly is holding you back? I dont see anyone telling you you cant make more money. Also, taxes are lower now than they have been in a very long time.

      Hey, Im sorry you are buying the 'over taxation' b.s. hook line and sinker. but it just doesnt agree with the facts. Also, lets say they magically lower your taxes by 5%. what is that magical 5% going to enable you to do that you cant accomplish now? I dont know how much you make, but if its low, than you arent paying that much in taxes anyway. and if you are making a lot, then hell, you are making a lot; what are you complaining about?

      It just seems like the same old boring, non-reality based argument that Limbaugh preaches. I dont consider myself either a republican or a democrat. But occasionally I listen to that guy, and its really just agrivation listen to his total pro-big business spin on everything. I have never heard anyone so biased loved by so many people since Adolf Hitler. Good thing Limbaugh isnt telling people to kill abortion doctors, thats for sure.
      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    16. Re:Completely OT, but... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      Just for the record, I fucking hate Limbaugh with a passion. The opinions that I've formed are predominately my own. I simply believe in personal responsibility. If that means that I have to pay the penalty for having made whatever bad decisions led me to a life of poverty, then so be it.

      I don't claim that my opinion is popular, or that it should be yours, but it's mine, and thank the heavens, I'm entitled to it.

      That said, if I were, for example, to receive back all the money that I'd paid in taxes, thus far, that were earmarked and or paid to schools, then I'd at least have the money to put my own daughter through the schools of my choosing.

      And also, I'm not opposed to taxes, I'm opposed to where my taxes go. I have no problem paying taxes at all, and understand where and why they are used in the methods that they are. Frankly, I would just rather have more choice.

      As for what is "holding me back", currently, nothing is. I'm quite happy in the life that I lead. I've got a great wife, great daughter, and a great job, with enough to put away for savings and enough food on the table to feed everyone.

      However, to do the question justice, what's holding me back is everyone else. Just as a lifeguard with a rescuee in tow is being "held back" by the person he's rescuing, I am being held back by everyone on Tennessee welfare, and a host of others.

      Anyway, if you'd like to have a real discussion, then I'm certainly open to it. If you, however, are going to make accusations that you can't possibly back up (which you've already done a number of times), then please, don't distract me any more.

      Thanks,
      -9mm-

    17. Re:Completely OT, but... by Ravenn · · Score: 1

      I believe that it is Switzerland that has a really good system for health care. The more you earn, the more taxes you pay. Fair enough. But then when you go to the doctor, you get treated. Regardless of income, you get the best treatment available. And the Swiss have some damn fine specialists.

      In todays society, you can make quite a good living from doing nothing. Sad, but all too true. people will be there to take advantage of freebies. I've known of people to put more effort into arranging a scam or robbery than it would have been worth to get a job and earn the money legit. To quote Bart Simpson: "He says that there are no easy answers. Well, I say HE'S NOT LOOKING HARD ENOUGH!"

      I know that I am doing my best. I am studying, and should be able to set us up better in a couple of years. The government does what it can to catch the cheats, but there is a whole society know based around the concept.

      And as for the tragedy scenario? That's the point of my study now. To allow that I can afford what is needed, and the ability to do all I can to prevent issues. I wouldn't wish the tragedies on anybody, but they happen all the same. I've seen it too many times. It's our jobs to either prevent or prepare for the tragedies, but do what we can if they happen.

      My first priorities now are my children.

      Ravenn

      --
      Of all the things you can accomplish by screwing up your face and swearing into a dark room, sleep is not one of them.
    18. Re:Completely OT, but... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      You're silly.

      Of course my taxes pay for police and the armed forces, and whatnot. That's the PURPOSE of the government.

      If you read the other reply I wrote to you, you'll see that I don't object to paying taxes at all. I object to paying taxes that go towards things like welfare and supporting the lives of convicted murderers for life terms.

      I HAVE gotten where I am on my own, and for you to demean that means that you're either on crack, or too used to having the government bail you out of your every petty woe to see that that's not their purpose.

      -9mm-

    19. Re:Completely OT, but... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      Again you attribute my opinions to Limbaugh.

      Please. You really ARE wasting my time. It's not the wisest thing to act as if you're a mind-reader. You're not. There are many public works that I don't have any problems paying taxes for. I understand the purpose of soup kitchens and homeless shelters, but that is, in my opinion, not the role of the government. Should they need to exist, in my opinion, they should be not-for-profits.

      As for my "redneck ass" never reading this, I try to respond to anything that looks even halfway intelligent. You just barely passed the margin, and of course, insulting me does little to get your points across. Oh, and while I might currently live in Tennessee (a redneck state), I'm almost assuredly more well travelled than you, and by no means grew up here.

      Oh, and by the way, perhaps, if you actually bothered to try and start some conversation and/or dialogue, instead of bashing what you (obviously) didn't understand, then we might have realized that there are plenty of your points that I agree with. Unfortunately, you've taken to the notion that even the slightest disagreement is obviously contrary to your own superior notions of how things should be.

      -9mm-

    20. Re:Completely OT, but... by Issue9mm · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry Tony. I didn't realize that you were a troll.

      -9mm-

    21. Re:Completely OT, but... by WowTIP · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Remind me to remind you of what you just said when it is you or your daughter innocently convicted to the chair/chamber/needles.

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    22. Re:Completely OT, but... by WowTIP · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I don't see how someone who rapes, tortures, and murders your wife is even allowed to have a point of view at that point.

      You have your right to think so, but what about all those who are innocently convicted? My guess is that their number is bigger than anyone would like to think about. Death sentences may look fine (an eye for an eye...) to some people when not taking those people into account. I guess most peoples trust in death penalties would be shaken a bit by having their own parents/children/siblings/partners risking being convicted to death innocently. ;(

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    23. Re:Completely OT, but... by tshak · · Score: 1

      Given the vast number of appeals allowed (most people on death row - without money - go through state and federal appeals), and considering that a Jurdy (the citzens) decides death NOT a judge, I'm not too worried about it. I know that people can get framed for murder but a murderer is generally not sent to death (unless it was really gruesome or for some other charges) on his first offense. Generally, the crimes are too haneous to frame someone, and the federal investigations that take place would easily uncover the fact that a person was framed. Even if it didn't, you are still going to be allowed virtually unlimited appeals if you believe that your case wasn't fair. And then consider the fact that most people on death row who get executed have not only been proven by the system to be the criminal in question, but have also confessed at being so.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    24. Re:Completely OT, but... by WowTIP · · Score: 2

      Well, when arguments run dry, you can always resort to karma attacks. :P

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    25. Re:Completely OT, but... by sangan'ak · · Score: 1

      Agreed that the govt. should have minimum interference in peoples' lives. But it is the duty of the govt. to ensure that atleast the fundam. needs of the pop. are being fulfilled. That is the bare mimimum required. Anything provided above that becomes politically driven lollipop distrib.

      Anything more provided at the cost of these fundam. needs of some people make the govt. undesirable.

      Food, clothing, shelter and education. These needs of the people have to be fulfilled by the govt. How the govt. does this, is another issue. Whether directly, but having lost cost public food distro centres, public housing and schools, or by handing out dole, or by actually running an economy where there exist employment oppors for people to actually earn enough money to afford the above, is every govt's own concern.

      I still think that public schools are required as long as the unemp. does not subst decrease in a country.

      ---lekhan sima`---

      Kaloa,
      Sangan'ak.

    26. Re:Completely OT, but... by krazor84 · · Score: 1

      Well actually, it's cheaper to lock someone away than to execute them. If someone is executed then they can have up to 18 years (that's the longest I can remember) of appeals in which they are locked up in a cell... much like a maximum security prison. Not only that but people who are facing the death penalty are a lot more likely to appeal than someone facing prison. Oh... and the court case goes up too. An average LA homicide case costs $600,000, but when the death penalty is sought the cost increases to over $1 million. (Source: Scientific America). So if it's value for money you're looking for... maximum security is the way to go.

    27. Re:Completely OT, but... by Rakarra · · Score: 2
      Well actually, it's cheaper to lock someone away than to execute them.

      You're certainly right about that. The logical solution is then to fix the system so that the above statement is no longer correct, and yet not execute innocent people. You wouldn't think it would be so hard..

  121. ok, geeks from New Orleans by david_g · · Score: 1

    Now's your chance to volunteer some free time and offer help to install some open source software. Beat Microsoft to its own game. Then use it as a model for all cities in the US.

    You have what it takes, you know that. All you need is some getting together and a plan of attack.

    *Sigh*, I wish I was an American living in New Orleans by this time. I'd sure be glad to help.

    1. Re:ok, geeks from New Orleans by meschman · · Score: 1

      i live here. they don't want any help.
      this is a career move for meffert, not the city's benefit.

  122. TANSTAAFL by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
    Is this journalist out of public school yet? It says in the first paragraph:

    ...agreement with Microsoft to update computer systems for City Hall and the Police Department free of charge

    Yet it is not free according to the second paragraph - it has strings attached and an undisclosed cost.

    The second paragraph says:

    The only requirement the computer giant has made of the city is

    then lists 2 requirements:

    (1) that New Orleans let Microsoft use it as a model for marketing the system to other governmental bodies once it is up and running, said Greg Meffert, the city's technology officer.

    (2)Eventually, he added, the city will have to purchase software from the company, but he said it would be a "minuscule" expense.

    So there are at least 2 requirements and a cost. Also, define "minuscule". If I were a taxpayer in the Big Easy, I'd sure as hell want a number. Big numbers always seem minuscule to public officials spending someone else's money.

    Because these services are considered a gift, the city won't have to publicly bid the project, he said.

    Some real hardcore and in-depth journalism here. It sounds more like the real story might be that Microsoft has found a way to do an end-run on the public tendering process. Also, if MS wants a real proving ground, they should be paying the City of New Orleans to compensate for the inevitable problems while they host the trial. Instead, the 'start button' for the trial will probably bring up a EULA box releasing MS from all liabilities and the Mayor will have to click the button.

    This just sounds like a variation on a common practice - the 'free gift'. The phrase 'free gift' is one of the most insidious and abused phrases in modern language, yet people fall for it all the time.

    There ought to be a law...

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
    1. Re:TANSTAAFL by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Technically, he's right. In the situation Microsoft would like to make common, Microsoft doesn't sell, it leases.

      If you don't own the thing, you haven't purchased it and the purchasing cost can be zero. You're just paying X$ per month/year/whatever, and when you stop, they shut everything off.

  123. Excellent gameplan by spagbol · · Score: 1

    It now looks quite clear how Microsoft plans of keeping control of the market. They make the desktop operating system, the server operating system, the database, the applications software. A nice neat package to do a specific job, complete! Just sign the contract and sit back. No need to call IBM, Sun or HP. They would still offer bits and pieces instead of a complete package. The ultimate weapon? Microsoft could withdraw its desktop operating system unless you buy a complete package. Very strong marketing plan.

  124. Alas, no by localroger · · Score: 2

    The one regional newspaper, the Times Picayune, does not put much of its content online. The story has gotten a lot of play in the local media but it's still local politics so I haven't seen it on the major news sites.

    --
    Brackets contain world's first nanosig, highly magnified:[.]
  125. Where is Lindows or RedHat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lindows and Microtel could come up with something here. Or even RedHat could come up with something. But either one of those groups probably couldn't afford it. Maybe some local LUGs could do something (snicker).

    Everyone here is hating Microsoft for offering to set this up for free and help them migrate to MS from their old system. Yes they need to have people to maintain this system, but MSCE's are a dime a dozen. New Orleans old system is going on 30 years old and who knows how much longer it will work.

    I think more Linux businesses (ie RedHat) or LUGs should go around to local governments and such who might have old computer systems and offer to help them convert to Linux/BSD whatever.

  126. Drug Dealer Tactics... by wowbagger · · Score: 2
    This reminds me of another "bidness"man's practices:

    Here you go kid - first one's free.

    Days later:

    You got it bad kid - tell you what, I'll let you have a little something to tide you over till you can get enough money to get what you REALLY need...


  127. I live in New Orleans... by JojoCoco · · Score: 1

    And its true our current systems in City Hall are extremely old and outdated, and our options are pretty limited due to money factors and closed mindedness, but is this what we really want? Nagin and Gates seem to be quite chummy, and this makes me very uncomfortable. I will not allow Microsoft to run over my city!

    1. Re:I live in New Orleans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for you. As one of the posters said - if this is a gift and no bids are allowed, New Orleans could take it and then bid out of it.

      Keep us posted and good luck to all of you.

  128. The catch by gophunk · · Score: 1

    People are saying that the catch is that New Orleans will have to upgrade, and then they'll be stuck with a big cost. Based on the previous city upgrade schedule, that'll be in the year 2020. At that point, it won't matter.

    The important part is that the city is getting the infrastructure to move into the modern business world. I don't recall anybody else jumping in to support this radical change -- Redhat, IBM, Sun?!? It's a smart play for MS, and a smart play for New Orleans. If other cities can pull it off, then please do so.

    1. Re:The catch by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3, Insightful
      All right, let's explore that a bit.

      How about if ALL CITIES are made to run on an entirely Microsoft infrastructure?

      Too much power. I'm sorry. Executive/legislature/judiciary is enough. We don't need to go executive/legislature/judiciary/Microsoft.

    2. Re:The catch by de_rus · · Score: 1

      Sure.

      MS will continue to support XP/.NET after 2006, because New Orleans (and all other cities that "can pull it off") refuses to update.
      As soon as the very first exploit goes public (my guess is the first week after MS drops support for XP/.NET), New Orleans will pay $$$ to any company that can upgrade them to Windows ZP.

  129. To quote the Tragically Hip by LeOS · · Score: 1

    New Orleans is sinking man, and I don't wanna swim.

  130. Liferosoft by Tablizer · · Score: 2


    New Orleans citizen: "Blue flashing traffic light? Hmmm. I have never seen that before, 'cept at Kmart".

  131. "Free?" Microsoft knows not the word by ChesireKat · · Score: 1

    After reading the original article i do find the mistake that New Orleans wont have to buy "the software" later...they will have to buy software later...slashdot reported this incorrectly IMHO. But hey, microsoft comes out looking like the god guy in all the this, right? they are being charitable. Yeah, okay right...mmmhmm im sure. Another point, Micro$oft is known for its lack of security, so im sure hackers everywhere will be loving the fact that crime files lack on a easily hackable windows system, eh? I have a feeling this is the begginning of the end, folks

    --
    ~Just keep eating, porky. Fat people are harder to kidnap.
  132. How appropos by Malcs · · Score: 1

    Today's random quote at the bottom of the page:

    "Beware of geeks bearing graft."

    --
    My name is Carlos Montoya. You share files of my music. Prepare to die.
  133. Has nothing to do with Free Speech or Free Beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's free software as in it won't cost Microsoft a dime, because eventually you have to pay for it. DUH.

    Hell no, they don't need to go to bid, that might give someone else a fair shot.

    You know, I am beginning to think Microsoft OWNS the government.

  134. Several points by SMITHEE · · Score: 1

    -There is more to this than just, "give them the first hit for free." Most public safety systems are based on other systems developed partially with government grant funds. The vendors avoid ownership questions by structuring the contracts such that the software is ostensibly free, and the only software charge is for customizing it. This has the added advantage of avoiding sales tax in many areas.
    -A great many of these public safety systems are already sold at a loss. The vendor only gets well from changes and add ons such as software maintenance contracts on the systems. This is not completely a scam, since the only limit on how often agencies will change their minds about what they want is money.
    -One hundred million sounds very inflated. Cities much bigger than New Orleans have built such systems for far less. It is only if you are throwing in things like a new police radio system and microwave network to connect all of the city offices that you can get the price that high.
    -Any fairly new municipal government computer system, particularly in a destination city like New Orleans, draws a steady stream of tours by politicians and bureaucrats on junkets from other cities. This seems to be good for the ego of the local politicians and bureaucrats. As a result, vendors routinely make a big production of assuring the locals that their system is going to be a showcase. This has the added advantage of allowing the locals to convince themselves that even if the vendor has a lousy reputation elsewhere, this time will be different.

  135. Witty reparte leading up this quote by endeitzslash · · Score: 1

    Jake: "Shit!"
    Elwood: "What?" Jake: "Rollers!" Elwood: "No!" Jake: "Yep!" Elwood: "Shit!"

    1. Re:Witty reparte leading up this quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jake: "The light was yellow, sir."

  136. get it straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you're going to go with the silly, badly spelled version it's nawlins.

    i mean, where do you even get nor'leans? n'orleans i could have understood.

    and this finger wagging from someone in new york of all places is pretty sad. yes, this town is corrupt. yes, we let our bars stay open all night. yes, you're free to write a crappy script about about some voodoo murder mystery where every other character is named (boudreau or thibodeau) with your bottomless wisdom of this town. just make sure you give everyone really absurd accents and include shots of a mardi gras parade no matter what time of year your story takes place.

  137. Economic urban legends at work by willpost · · Score: 1

    "eventually has to buy the software"
    "Because these services are considered a gift, the city won't have to publicly bid the project"

    Receiving an item to be repayed at a later date is a loan, not a gift. They are bypassing the public bid system. Either they are taking a loss to establish a monopoly or it illustrates how much they gouge everyone else with huge margins.

    Almost all economic mistakes in history were caused by one of two things:
    - ignoring the big picture and focusing (selling) only on short or long term
    - ignoring all the groups of people and focusing (selling) only on one group

    There is no free lunch.

    1. Re:Economic urban legends at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree. This is really bawlsy in light of the fact that they are still facing the firing squad.

      No one can stop them from donating the stuff, but they can't buy it later. That is a subversion of the bidding process. Moreover it's pretty much in line with what the Beast has done with listserv and hotmail. Free now, pay through the snout later.

      My guess? No one does a damn thing about it.

  138. It's "lose" not "loose" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't make me sick LoseNotLooseGuy on your ass. My apologies if you're suffering from Alzheimer's and not just a language deficiency.

  139. I don't understand.. by Kwil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..the aversion to a public bidding process.

    If the mayor had some amount of intelligence, he could say, "Look, we gotta have a proper bidding process here, but feel free to offer your stuff on the same terms for the bid."

    This way, he'd avoid bribery allegations and it would also open things up for an even better offer to come through. Also, if Microsoft won (which I would actually expect, especially if they're offering migration support as well as software) they could then point to the city and say "See? Our software got chosen over supposedly 'free' software. Our software is therefore better, and that's why we charge."

    Easy opportunity for a double win for MS (they get their test city and get it in an open bid) and a double win for the mayor. (He's squeaky clean, plus gets his free software)

    Is there some flaw in the logic that MS and the mayor are seeing here that I've missed, or are they just going blind?

    --

    That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

  140. Microsoft Advertizes why not Linux??? by killerface · · Score: 0

    You see it's stuff like this that makes me happy we have a community of Linux and Open Source users and as users of linux we should compete against M$ and use each other as a mechinism to boast about our source the freebird Project freebird.8m.net is a new project devoted to finding people who want to make linux Advertisable through television and radio and any other media types if we can build this network we can take the cuffs of new orleans.

  141. New Orleans a Hotbed of Microsoft Activity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least one business in New Orleans uses Windows, and they don't care if it stays up or not. Takes a lot of talent to put up a linux system, and they're short on that.

  142. Real gifts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Real gifts come with no strings attached - a no contracts.

    Is this really a gift?

  143. Actually, it's called government by Infonaut · · Score: 2
    Government is actually supposed to be representative of the people it serves. See, businesses are profit-making ventures, while governments are created and sustained ostensibly to protect, educate, and sustain the population. While governments conduct businesses, they are not businesses, nor should they be.

    Yes, yes, corporate America could run government much better than elected officials. Of course they could. If only the chiefs of AOL, Enron, Philip Morris, and Worldcom were running our local, state, and federal governments, things would be so much more efficient.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  144. Big Easy.... by imsirovic5 · · Score: 1

    I live down here in New Orleans so I think I speak with some authority on this subject...

    See New Orleans is a unique city where at any given time you got more parties, public nudity and drunkiness then anywhere else in the country combined! So New Orleans is a perfect place for Microsoft to test their stuff since when it starts crashing everybody will be too drunk to notice it or even care about it.. Afterall New Orleans is known as Big Easy ;o) Everything goes down here.. We are used to it ;o)

  145. THE MORNING EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THE WHOLE CITY OF MICRO ORLEANS NOW HAS TO RECITE THE EULA BEFORE GOING TO BED. methink the scheme goes like this:

    somecity, usa. Through MS support inept governance takes place (3-5) years.
    IT starts to fall drastically behind. It is now obvious even to a clicker that the city bureaucracy is in trouble.
    Billy Gatos comes to the
    mayor's rescue. What a deal: the mayor scores a major victory, MS owns the souls of the citizens.

    how do you represent a foul burp in letters?

  146. Mistranslation? by djlowe · · Score: 1

    Um, beg pardon, but, so far as I know, all translations of the Bible are deemed to be inspired by God, and so divinely accurate by definition...

    Sorry, couldn't resist playing Devil's Advocate .

    1. Re:Mistranslation? by tshak · · Score: 1

      Yes, but thanks to the limitations of Text confusion can still arise (hence the kill...murder confusion).

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    2. Re:Mistranslation? by Rakarra · · Score: 2
      Um, beg pardon, but, so far as I know, all translations of the Bible are deemed to be inspired by God, and so divinely accurate by definition...

      Hmmm... that sounds cool. Time to start writing my own "translations..."

  147. no wonder gift in german means POISON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said -

  148. Not a gift. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

    This isn't a gift, it's a loss leader. How can they circumvent competitive tender regulations by pretending the first part of a huge lucrative deal is a gift. It's crazy. Microsoft isn't giving them the hardware because they think they will lose money on this deal. Just how dumb are these civic leaders?

  149. Like your friendly local drug pusher by Goonie · · Score: 2
    offering free samples of crack.

    Of course, people are quite correct to point out that this kind of tactic is common in business. It's still stupid for governments to fall for it. Public tendering is the way to go for any big government purchase - heck, for any big purchase.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  150. Re:Hmmm...Not good. UN...NO it doesn't by johnnyb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is that there was no bid process. Clearly Microsoft gains in this, or they wouldn't do it. Shouldn't others be able to show how their solution would be even better for the city long-term, and the potential problems with the existing solution?

    This is the entire reason that government entities have bid processes - to make sure that noone is slimeballing their way into making the city pay out large sums of money. In this case, the payment is delayed, but the lock-in is evident.

  151. Tried and true come-on by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    >The only requirement the computer giant has made of the city is that New Orleans let Microsoft use it as a model for marketing the system to other governmental bodies once it is up and running, said Greg Meffert, the city's technology officer.

    Two words: Aluminum siding.

    rj

  152. Don't you mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Microsoft sinks Teeth into New Orleans


    Teeth? Surely you meant Fangs.

  153. Drug dealer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft must have taken a look at the drug dealing bussines ******** Here, have a free smoke, its good and i give it to you free

  154. Re:SCMODS, my slightly rewritten version... by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

    Elwood:"I bet these cops got SCMODS."

    Jake:"SCMODS?"

    Elwood:"State, County, Municiple Offender Data System."

    Jake:"Shit!"

    [ Cops remain in cruiser for 5 minutes, waiting for Windoze to reboot...]

    [ Camera pans to Police Data Display, as the MS logo changes to white characters on a blue background. ]

    Cop: "Shit! It's the blue screen of death! Again!"

    [ Cop steps out of car, approached Jake & Elwood ]

    Cop: "Well Elwood, I would run a more thorough search, but our computers are down, I'll have to let you off with just a warning."

    Elwood: "Have you guys ever heard of Linux?

    Cop: What's that? Does it link to my GPS database of doughnut shops?

    Elwood: Never mind.

  155. great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would you rather have creating a bureocracy...
    a microsoft run and efficient bureocracy... or one created by the government... this is inevitable... I knew microsoft was going to pitch this sooner or later... wich the experience they get from mapping business rules and so one they will increase their lead even more... but like i said... I am happy with microsoft... someday we will all be working for microsoft and the world will be a much better place

    1. Re:great idea by theolein · · Score: 2

      Jawohl-Fucking Nazi git

  156. NOT ONLY IN THE USA / THIS AIN'T THE FIRST OR LAST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After working for over 4 1/2 months abroad, mostly in Central America, I can say without a doubt that governments being courted by Microsoft to deals like this one.

    **If you start to read the fine print, you may find clauses that: **

    a) lock them into using only Microsoft's OS. This inludes security devices such as firewalls.

    b) lock them into this deal for a period of 3 years.

    c) provide no upgrade service.

    d) provide access to all databases, etc. for the transition effort.

    These types of deals are going to be a global concern.

    Lot's of Open Source guys rant, rave, hem and haw talking about how Microsoft is crappy and evil.

    If you want to help the public, hold their hand and educate them. Show them stuff they can relate to... skip the new wiz cool skin/desktop. Show them business productivity and INNOVATION!
    Show them the numbers.

    These deals will be a problem if someone doesn't step in.

  157. Re:Let's try AGAIN? by darkPHi3er · · Score: 2
    You missed my point(s), perhaps i was unclear

    1. This is an HUGE OPPORTUNITY for some LINUX distro and Company with hair to get some media exposure (FREE marketing -- hard to comeby in this world).

    2. If NOLA + MS is going to short-circuit the bid process, why shouldn't EVERYBODY get to play? (BTW, this is almost certainly a ***LEGAL*** circumvention of the bid process -- very few governmental entities have a rule against accepting ***FREE*** anything, as long as it is NOT an attempt to gain POLTICAL FAVOR). This is VERY, VERY slick on MS' part.

    3. VERY FEW Federal, State, Regional, Municipal entities have a F*****G CLUE when it comes to IT procurement. They are freq well behind industry in IT acquisition/deployment (not all that many corporations are great at it either).

    So, NOLA is gonna do whatever NOLA is gonna do. Courts might reverse it later, much later. Probably not (separation of powers and all that).

    I suggest you consider what my main man, StevieB, has probably already figured out...once a few 2nd/3rd tier munincipalities have adopted a 'City Wide' apps and services vendor (WHOEVER that is) it will MUCH, MUCH easier to sell the rest of them.

    Procurement specialists (need to be careful about discussing 'procurement' in NOLA -- my favorite American city) in government jobs are VERY, VERY conservative and follow a "herd rule". Once a few of these entities adopts a given solution, many/most of the others will follow.

    We can sit on the sidlines and cry "Foul" and ask for the "Ref" to intercede (and we've all seen how effective that strategy is, haven't we?), or we return the punch.

    Quod erat demonstrandum...

    --
    Ten quid, she's so easy to blind. And not a word is spoken...
  158. why worry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them do it. They can only get egg on their face later, or it will cost too much to run.

  159. Who is the next victim? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the real question. How can we find out what
    other cities are being approached??

  160. Send in the scientologists. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tom Cruise and John Travolta really kick ass.
    Or was that they really lick some ass.
    Well anyway. Send in "XENU the barbarian" to take care
    of the those windows users.

  161. Remember Fletch 2? by t0qer · · Score: 2


    If I remember right, fletch 2 took place in thibideux louisiana. I'm not shocked that life is going to imitate art!

  162. Mistranlations don't matter... by krazor84 · · Score: 1

    But it doesn't matter what the Old Testament says, or if it's mistranslated as it is over written in Christianity by the New Testament, and seeing as the message of the New Testament is a definate forgive the sinner, it is hard to see how putting anyone to death is acting in accordance with the Bible. However, the USA is suppose to be a secular society where government and law are concerned so I don't think it matters anyway.

  163. can you smell that smell? by FuBaR+Technician · · Score: 1

    I live close enough to tell you all that something already stunk there way before Microsoft stepped in. Just get a whiff when you walk down Burbon St.

    PU!

    Honestly, the city needs something. From reading the article and the city's public forum seems like their biggest hurdle is going to be getting workers now. They have to hire people from inside the perrish. And I'm sure there are a few who qualify, however, most of the people that live in the perrish aren't going to be skilled enough to run anything besides a store or a garbage truck, there just aren't enough full time residents there who can get the job done.

    Once they relax that policy and you can live in, lets say Kenner, then maybe I think about helping out.

    -Tony

  164. How did this get +4? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you need a system customized for running a traffic ticket managment system, then Linux can be customized to do so. Do you need a way to keep track of city salaries, Linux can do a better job of managing a database of names and income levels.

    Oh, really?

    What evidence do you have of this?

    How many cities do you know of that use Linux to run their traffic lights, manage their employee information, or do any of the other things you mention?

    Getting ahead now is fine, but what is Microsft going to say 5 years from now when its time to upgrade again? Do you really think they'll allow the city to keep its copies of Windows XP when the special license agreement says they must upgrade or else?

    I have never seen such an agreement on any piece of software (Microsoft included) I have owned. Can you explain the terms of this agreement further, or are you just FUD-mongering?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  165. How does an entire city... by gostbustaz · · Score: 1

    display the Blue Screen of Death?

  166. Just do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  167. Er.. No other bids because it's a gift? by Benjaman+McFree · · Score: 0

    Because these services are considered a gift, the city won't have to publicly bid the project, he said.

    When there are strings attached that later on down the road they'll be forced to buy software, how can they claim it's a Gift?

    I guess since our government is in bed with MS, they'll continue to let MS be anti-competative

    --It's all about maintaining POWER AND CONTROL; what bastards!

  168. What about expiring subscriptions? by theolein · · Score: 2

    WTF they gonna do when Billy says the licence has expired. They'll be fucked.

  169. You all gonna belong to MS soon if this carries on by theolein · · Score: 2

    USM: The United States of Microsoft.