Yet of course you can easily see how if that tweet had made reference to killing black people or Muslims, by a white christian, they would have been removed from the platform immediately.
Consistent how? Milo was banned but others (such as the subject of his ban) haven't been. Twitter is fast becoming an echo chamber for people who call themselves "liberals" but who are in fact authoritarians.
I totally agree it's self-correcting for undefined values of t, yes. However there's a more important issue here, and that's the incestuous relationship between government, policy and scientists. That is to say, a fair chunk of scientists are working in the policy-based evidence manufacture industry. I'm not talking about the people at CERN with their beautiful 5-sigma results. I'm talking about the kind of cretin who tells me egg yolks give me heart disease and then 10 years later tells me they don't. This is a real problem because it undermines public trust in science and scientists - and of course the hype is mostly institution-PR, not the scientists themselves. Perhaps less money will concentrate minds.
no cluse as to if we can do it in a sensible manner.
Assuming other people are ignorant of the subject just because you are is a common fallacy. Brexiters voted to give our MPs the power to decide how we leave and what the deal will be. They will be judged at the ballot box on it in 2020. This is called democracy and it's the main reason Leave won. You seem to have missed this point, inexplicably.
rah rah history rah rah we were the biggest empire too once. So what?
I didn't mention the Empire. I said we'd been independent for 1,000 years. You seem to think we're incapable of governing ourselves without the drunkard Jean Claude Junker's help. What a fucking joke.
We always were an independent country.
Alas not. An independent country can sign its own treaties and trade deals. It can decide its own laws and not have them subject to some supranational powers. It can have its own immigration policy. It's supreme court really is supreme. None of those things apply to the UK inside the European Union.
They were happy to take a wild leap into the dark funded on a pack of lies
It's not a wild leap in the dark. It's independence. Again, the same independence we enjoyed for 1,000 years before we joined the EU. And speaking of a bit shit, you do realise there's a permanent financial crisis in the Eurozone and that southern Europe is currently enjoying 50% youth unemployment, a resurgence of the far right, a terrorist campaign against it and a general decline so hard it's the only region on earth that isn't growing, don't you? Strange that you fail to draw the obvious conclusions. It's almost as if you're wearing blinkers.
Once you run out of reason, which took all of 2 posts, just resort to insults.
That's because the EU is breathtakingly Byzantine in its construction - deliberately so. And it's also why whenever in the past a country has voted against an EU treaty, they've been invited to vote again. Thankfully the UK has put a stop to this.
Are you suggesting it's impossible for us to pool resources and collaborate with the EU unless we're members of it? Things are better now. We can make the decision whether to pool resources on a case by case basis, in our own interests. Like every other independent country on the planet.
Having a trade deal with a weaker standing is better than not having any trade deals at all because the EU is a corporate protection racket. I mean really, little Singapore has more trade deals than the EU.
The government and civil service are working on a plan now. That's they're job. I have no idea why you think the UK, an independent country for 1,000 years notwithstanding our 40 year membership of the EU, is now incapable of governing itself. What a sad little mind you have.
Slashdot Mirror
Au contraire mon ami.
Haha I saw that too. SJW bullshit.
I'll be honest with you here. Directory Opus looks shit.
It's based on a steaming pile of turd excreted from the backside of an NGO wanting publicity for more government funding.
Yet of course you can easily see how if that tweet had made reference to killing black people or Muslims, by a white christian, they would have been removed from the platform immediately.
I think my case is pretty strong actually.
Oh sure, all those "blacklivesmatter" tweets are really civilised.
Consistent how? Milo was banned but others (such as the subject of his ban) haven't been. Twitter is fast becoming an echo chamber for people who call themselves "liberals" but who are in fact authoritarians.
What, like Christina Hoff Sommers? She's never made any counterarguments has she.
He's a professional provocateur who's "act" is designed to smoke out arseholes like you. Seems to be working.
Been using it since release. No problems worth mentioning. You're soliciting a biased sample here, by the way.
Which complete fucking cuck moron moderated this "redundant"? These "hate speech" AIs will evolve into censorship AIs and then we're all fucked.
The ECHR isn't the ECJ. When we leave the EU, we'll leave the jurisdiction of the ECJ. The ECHR is a completely different body, with 47 member states.
I totally agree it's self-correcting for undefined values of t, yes. However there's a more important issue here, and that's the incestuous relationship between government, policy and scientists. That is to say, a fair chunk of scientists are working in the policy-based evidence manufacture industry. I'm not talking about the people at CERN with their beautiful 5-sigma results. I'm talking about the kind of cretin who tells me egg yolks give me heart disease and then 10 years later tells me they don't. This is a real problem because it undermines public trust in science and scientists - and of course the hype is mostly institution-PR, not the scientists themselves. Perhaps less money will concentrate minds.
Assuming other people are ignorant of the subject just because you are is a common fallacy. Brexiters voted to give our MPs the power to decide how we leave and what the deal will be. They will be judged at the ballot box on it in 2020. This is called democracy and it's the main reason Leave won. You seem to have missed this point, inexplicably.
I didn't mention the Empire. I said we'd been independent for 1,000 years. You seem to think we're incapable of governing ourselves without the drunkard Jean Claude Junker's help. What a fucking joke.
Alas not. An independent country can sign its own treaties and trade deals. It can decide its own laws and not have them subject to some supranational powers. It can have its own immigration policy. It's supreme court really is supreme. None of those things apply to the UK inside the European Union.
It's not a wild leap in the dark. It's independence. Again, the same independence we enjoyed for 1,000 years before we joined the EU. And speaking of a bit shit, you do realise there's a permanent financial crisis in the Eurozone and that southern Europe is currently enjoying 50% youth unemployment, a resurgence of the far right, a terrorist campaign against it and a general decline so hard it's the only region on earth that isn't growing, don't you? Strange that you fail to draw the obvious conclusions. It's almost as if you're wearing blinkers.
Why not? You're clearly a fucking idiot.
If only France, Italy and Greece had their own currencies that rose or fell with economic conditions.
Yes. The company I work for also exports all over the world, much less to the EU, so it's good for us too.
That's because the EU is breathtakingly Byzantine in its construction - deliberately so. And it's also why whenever in the past a country has voted against an EU treaty, they've been invited to vote again. Thankfully the UK has put a stop to this.
They could do that before. Nothing to do with the EU.
They will for you, yes. Every day we make a success of it, you'll be just that little bit more miserable.
Are you suggesting it's impossible for us to pool resources and collaborate with the EU unless we're members of it? Things are better now. We can make the decision whether to pool resources on a case by case basis, in our own interests. Like every other independent country on the planet.
France is locked into an artificially high exchange rate otherwise known as the Euro.
Yes, because we didn't manage to stand on our own for the 1,000 years preceding our membership of the EU, did we.
Having a trade deal with a weaker standing is better than not having any trade deals at all because the EU is a corporate protection racket. I mean really, little Singapore has more trade deals than the EU.
Apart from the fact the EU is an utter disaster of course - something you Remainers conveniently forget.
The government and civil service are working on a plan now. That's they're job. I have no idea why you think the UK, an independent country for 1,000 years notwithstanding our 40 year membership of the EU, is now incapable of governing itself. What a sad little mind you have.