Slashdot Mirror


User: whipslash

whipslash's activity in the archive.

Stories
29
Comments
840
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 840

  1. Re: Slashdot Editorial Message Modding - An Update on World Reacts To The Worst Mass Shooting In U.S. History (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Probably because a handful of the 300,000 people on this site think your comment is longwinded and pointless and they see it modded as 5, so they do it justice and knock it back to -1. Us editors do not give enough shits about your comments to sit there modding them up or down. You have some sort of complex thinking you are important and you're being wronged somehow.

  2. Re:Slashdot Editorial Message Modding - An Update on World Reacts To The Worst Mass Shooting In U.S. History (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    Typo

  3. Re:Slashdot Editorial Message Modding - An Update on World Reacts To The Worst Mass Shooting In U.S. History (cnn.com) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Editors didn't mod any of those links up or down. What happened is, of the 300,000 unique visitors per day that view Slashdot, more than a handful decided that you're comments sucked and modded appropriately.

  4. Re:Evidence of Editorial Up-Modding on World Reacts To The Worst Mass Shooting In U.S. History (cnn.com) · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're welcome to spend as much time as you want as an AC, writing out long-winded diatribes and bolding words if it makes you happy. We are not Reddit so we will allow you to do this as much as you want. Just know that you are wrong, and your posts are pretty stupid which is why people mod you down.

  5. Re:Fuck Reddit on World Reacts To The Worst Mass Shooting In U.S. History (cnn.com) · · Score: 4, Funny

    It does not happen here. You're spreading misinformation.

  6. Re:Slashdot sides with the moslems! on World Reacts To The Worst Mass Shooting In U.S. History (cnn.com) · · Score: 2

    Nope. You're wrong.

  7. Re:Islamic influence on Slashdot on World Reacts To The Worst Mass Shooting In U.S. History (cnn.com) · · Score: 4, Informative

    You're wrong. No editors modded your comment up or down.

  8. Facebook lets you browse by newest if you want

  9. Re:Republican Financial Acumen on Scott Walker Rents Out Email and Donor Lists To Pay Campaign Debt (wisconsingazette.com) · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot

  10. Re:Scooped by like everybody on Judge Orders 'Intentionally Deceptive' DOJ Lawyers To Take Remedial Ethics Class (zerohedge.com) · · Score: 2

    Yes there are automated aggregators now, including Google. Slashdot still relies entirely on human editors. The main benefit of Slashdot is the discussion, not the speed of breaking stories.

    "Slashdot is not the Wall Street Journal. It is not The New York Times. Slashdot is an informal meeting ground. A town hall. A pub. A bulletin board in the quad on campus. Here people might not properly capitalize a proper noun. They might transpose letters in 'thier'. They might use jargon that isn't in oxford. And all of that is OK with me." -Cmdr Taco https://news.slashdot.org/stor...

    You're welcome to go somewhere else if you want the most up to date breaking stories, but we have decreased the window of old stories drastically since the site changed ownership hands a few months ago. Looking back at comments from 16 years ago though, and not much has changed with the "this isn't breaking news" or "this isn't news for nerds" gripes. Guess it's somewhat of a hobby.

  11. Re:Slashdot was sold? on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    Thanks for commenting twice about this. We included our own post in the description, but many people prefer seeing a third party source report on this as well rather than just directly posting our own announcements.

  12. Re:What about SF's own crap? on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    Some slip through programmatic advertising channels, but they are typically removed as soon as they are caught and then that advertiser is banned from the site. We will have a self-serve reporting option attached to each ad very soon so that they are reported and removed ASAP. The vast majority of them are gone.

  13. Re:Works great on Netflix Launches Fast.com To Show How Fast Your Internet Connection Really Is (venturebeat.com) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's another good one that doesn't require Flash or Silverlight but gives a lot more details: https://www.voipreview.org/spe...

  14. Re: Example? on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    Any bundled installers that were added by the previous SourceForge ownership were removed months ago

  15. Re:Sigh... on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    I will take a look at what's going on here

  16. Re:Sigh... on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    That is not our malware warning on your project, that is the browser warning.

  17. Re: Certainly can't hurt on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    Traffic and comments are actually up vs the same period last year

  18. Re:Filezilla on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    It may depend on what OS you're using right now. On this Mac I am seeing no link to SourceForge here: https://filezilla-project.org/... . I've checked on Windows as well but not Linux. You can always download it from SourceForge as we do not allow FileZilla to bundle anymore: https://sourceforge.net/projec...

  19. Re:Slashdot was sold? on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 2

    Thanks. We're doing our best.

  20. Re:Example? on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    All current live projects have rectified any issues with malware due to us notifying them except for this Demo Project we created: https://sourceforge.net/projec... . Here is an older version of PDF Creator that shows the warning: https://sourceforge.net/projec... (automatic downloading disabled and notice about possible malware). Keep in mind this is an older version of their project and their current project here is fine: https://sourceforge.net/projec...

  21. Re:About freakin' time on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Scans are done by Bitdefender and ESET

  22. Re:Do not trust Sourceforge on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sorry about that. We only purchased SourceForge on January 28th and started making improvements after that.

  23. Re:Filezilla on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    Yes he stopped linking to SourceForge Filezilla project page from his own site after we told him he cannot bundle software with the project anymore.

  24. Re:What about SF's own crap? on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 1

    Ads with "Download" buttons in them have been eliminated from the site.

  25. Re:What about SF's own crap? on SourceForge Tightens Security With Malware Scans (fossforce.com) · · Score: 5, Informative

    We got rid of those bundled installers shortly after purchasing SourceForge: https://news.slashdot.org/stor...