Agreed. That's the way most database applications should be build if maintenance is high on the priority list.
Also: PLEASE MAKE USE OF GOOD DATABASE CONCEPTS. Foreign keys are there for a reason you know and they become really important if the application reaches a particular size. Study triggers and stored procedures. Look at the SQL execution path for hints to optimize the SQL query.
And please, MAKE USE OF GOOD DATABASE DESIGN CONCEPTS. It's amazing howmuch redundancy is build in present database applications wich is not good for performance or maintainability.
This is like complaining that an old Windows 3.1 program doesn't follow the offical Windows XP UI guidelines. Emacs comes from a time when there were no UI standards available. Not important ones anyway.
Besides, the code is available. If it bothers you that much, send in patches.
Slashdot Mirror
What are you talking about ? There is oversight on scientists. It's called peer review.
You might not agree with him but damn ... wishing that somebody should be MIA because you don't agree with him is just plain stupid.
Nobody is demanding from those users to click the movie, the email-address containing the phishing address or opening a funny picture from an email.
They want it. They don't care about the consequenses. Not because they like to wreck the internet, just because they don't know any better.
Someone who has all these files on their hard drives is either a compulsive packrat or might be up to no good...
Funniest thing I read all day. So being curious is dangerous ?
Very informative, great post !
Great clip, I laughed my ass off ...
:P
He has a very special skill. A bit weird tough
There is an awfull lot of commercial software written for Solaris or only supported on Solaris.
The random generator is liberal, thus biased.
If I had any mod points, you would get a +FUNNY from me.
That's what POSIX is all about: semantics.
They are so gonna get toasted in court.
Following this logic, ancient manufacturers of coaches could sue modern car manufacturers just because they use wheels too.
Different times, different technology.
These are indeed strange times if countering pseudo-science with sound scientific data is called 'political'.
What's keeping these "acknowledged experts" from contributing _now_ to Wikipedia ?
I was referring to some good DB practices, nothing more.
People should make their own opinions, not repeat others.
PS: I'm a DB2 fan
Agreed. That's the way most database applications should be build if maintenance is high on the priority list.
Also: PLEASE MAKE USE OF GOOD DATABASE CONCEPTS. Foreign keys are there for a reason you know and they become really important if the application reaches a particular size. Study triggers and stored procedures. Look at the SQL execution path for hints to optimize the SQL query.
And please, MAKE USE OF GOOD DATABASE DESIGN CONCEPTS. It's amazing howmuch redundancy is build in present database applications wich is not good for performance or maintainability.
This is like complaining that an old Windows 3.1 program doesn't follow the offical Windows XP UI guidelines. Emacs comes from a time when there were no UI standards available. Not important ones anyway.
Besides, the code is available. If it bothers you that much, send in patches.