Slashdot Mirror


User: sysrammer

sysrammer's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,203
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,203

  1. Re:prediction... more good comments... not on The Cheap Energy Revolution Is Here, and Coal Won't Cut It (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    ...and the Illuminati Guilds, keeping the secrets of armchair creation to themselves!

  2. "Everyone said carbon dating was accurate for decades, but it really wasn't."

    Actually it was, just "science" as it were involves a few setbacks, obstacles, mishaps, errors, errata, etc, and you failed to define "accurate" - it's damn accurate! It's way better than your guesswork and 99% of other possible methodologies. Is it perfect? Nope. That doesn't make it useless.

    qft

  3. Re:Sagan on Velikovsky on New Study Suggests Humans Lived In North America 130,000 Years Ago (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    One thing that I got out of WIC was the imagining of how major celestial events would appear to ancient people. How they might look and be interpreted.

    FWIW it might be that kind of thinking was more common in the appropriate circles back then, but, in my case, reading the book is when I first started wondering about it. And then I started seeing more and more hypotheses and theories on how the Earth-Moon system was formed, f'rinstance, and used for other catastrophic and/or chaotic events.

  4. Re:Political implications for "Native Americans" on New Study Suggests Humans Lived In North America 130,000 Years Ago (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    We are all descendants of conquerors and slaves.

  5. Re:Political implications for "Native Americans" on New Study Suggests Humans Lived In North America 130,000 Years Ago (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    "But just try to find a Native American who brags about being one-sixteenth Belgian."

    Ha!

  6. Re: Political implications for "Native Americans" on New Study Suggests Humans Lived In North America 130,000 Years Ago (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    Hear Hear!

  7. Re: Political implications for "Native Americans" on New Study Suggests Humans Lived In North America 130,000 Years Ago (npr.org) · · Score: 0

    They don't get special privileges for being first. They get it because European Americans more or less stole their land. It's a form of compensation colonial governments such as the US government voluntarily gave them. Also most tribes and the US BIA regulate based on quantum of blood for enrollment, I.e. too little native and you're out of the tribe because morons like you say these things.

    Thanks. Good retort. Quick and simple.

  8. When I was in Okinawa I was told that humans originated in Okinawa.

  9. It's ironic that the last part of his post is "make any sense regardless".

  10. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt, that it is just a poorly written sentence. But it did make my jaw drop at first.

    Either that or "she" caught a few.

  11. YAY, PISSING CONTEST!

  12. Re:They're my friends,,, I make them on Will the High-Tech Cities of the Future Be Utterly Lonely? (theweek.com) · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Geo-Cities tried to emulate that (or came up with neighborhoods first, i dunno), but it never lived up to the potential. And, anybody from anywhere could move in. Sometimes that kind of thing can be enriching, and sometimes not.

    Your comment about the civility of a local site is interesting. I know there are sites like meetup that concentrate on locals. I tried one for guitars. Turned out to be an unpleasant experience. So that can happen too.

    Since I bothered to reply, I checked out the link. It's been way too long since I've seen that movie. I thought to myself as it started "I don't remember this". Then after a bit I remembered. I vaguely remember that things didn't turn out too well for our engineer friend.

  13. Re:Indeed! on Will the High-Tech Cities of the Future Be Utterly Lonely? (theweek.com) · · Score: 1

    Giskard, is that you?

  14. Re:Under The Bridge on Will the High-Tech Cities of the Future Be Utterly Lonely? (theweek.com) · · Score: 1

    I drive on her streets
    'Cause she's my companion
    I walk through her hills
    'Cause she knows who I am
    She sees my good deeds
    And she kisses me windy
    I never worry
    Now that is a lie

  15. Re:Sentient on Will the High-Tech Cities of the Future Be Utterly Lonely? (theweek.com) · · Score: 1

    I see where you get your handle.

  16. Re:Do fish know it's wet? on Will the High-Tech Cities of the Future Be Utterly Lonely? (theweek.com) · · Score: 1

    You can be surrounded by people and be lonely. You can be alone and not lonely. You know what kills the urge to be around people? People. What sparks the desire to be around people? People. Go ahead and keep blaming the machines.

    "People are a problem" - D. Adams

  17. Re:Loneliness? It's hard to be left alone! on Will the High-Tech Cities of the Future Be Utterly Lonely? (theweek.com) · · Score: 1

    ditto

  18. Re:increased urbanization of world's population on Will the High-Tech Cities of the Future Be Utterly Lonely? (theweek.com) · · Score: 1

    it's not a choice if you're rejected by society because you're either hideously ugly or autistic...

    I'm a hideously ugly autist, you insensitive clod!

  19. Re:increased urbanization of world's population on Will the High-Tech Cities of the Future Be Utterly Lonely? (theweek.com) · · Score: 1

    Reel 'em in!

  20. Re:I don't believe it on New Study Suggests Humans Lived In North America 130,000 Years Ago (npr.org) · · Score: 1

    There is no way humans were living in California 130,000 years ago without draconian intellectual property laws and copyright. They would never have survived.

    They did, and they didn't.

  21. Re:Who paid for this study? on Popular Belief That Saturated Fat Clogs Up Arteries Is a Myth, Experts Say (independent.ie) · · Score: 2

    You're a funny guy. Hope your karma can handle it. I was leaning more towards +1 Insightful, myself.

  22. Re:Your dictionary is broken on The Cheap Energy Revolution Is Here, and Coal Won't Cut It (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    Agencies can't pass laws. Only the legislative branch. Per the constitution, the executive branch has the authority to create the mechanisms to carry out the laws.

    The legislative branch can constrain the executive by passing laws. The exec branch can appeal to the legal branch if they wish.

    Note the word "can", of course. Having 3 points of power is inherently chaotic.

  23. Re:Global warming is a good thing on The Cheap Energy Revolution Is Here, and Coal Won't Cut It (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    Ok, thanks for the clarification.

  24. Re:Your dictionary is broken on The Cheap Energy Revolution Is Here, and Coal Won't Cut It (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    Good thing we have a constitution and 3 branches of govt to provide bounds and limits.

  25. Re:Incorrect on The Cheap Energy Revolution Is Here, and Coal Won't Cut It (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    I mod you +1 Cromulent.