They surveyed people in the Republican party... and then later they surveyed people in the Republican party. Whether the people are the same and the views have changed, or the views are the same but the people have changed, is irrelevant. It's still a survey of the Republican party.
I'm not really sure what the distinction between "logic" and "intuition" in this case is...
I disagree that it's easy to imagine what an atom looks like. If I scaled up an atom of hydrogen so that it was 1m across (instead of 10^-10 m), you wouldn't see anything because the nucleus and the electron would still be microscopic. It certainly won't look anything like this.
The Earth is a non-inertial reference frame. When you attempt to view the Solar System from this frame, you will have to introduce fictitious forces to account for the fact that the reference frame you chose is actually accelerating.
So it's not quite as simple as you make it out to be.
I don't really know why people get hung up on the fact that QM is non-intuitive. There are many macroscopic physical phenomena that also defy intuition.
I see the Sun move across the sky every day, but I don't feel the Earth move at all. Intuitively the Sun must orbit the Earth, right? Except that overwhelming evidence beyond my own measly human observation has shown that in fact, the Earth orbits the Sun.*
QM is exactly the same. It defies intuition, but the evidence backs it up. There is no reason to expect the laws of nature to be intuitive.
*inb4 all the smart-asses who want to point out that they both orbit a common center of mass:P
They are speaking of 2 different effects, both caused by the melting of ice.
The first effect is due to how the land responds to the ice melting. This continues long after the ice has melted, because the land does not decompress instantly. This is not (really) about glaciers that are melting today, the land is rebounding from glaciers which melted millennia ago.
The second effect is due simply to the loss of the ice itself. As stated in TFS, the 7500Gtons is only over the last 100 years. That much mass loss in a fairly localized area was enough to make a significant contribution to the movement of Earth's center of mass, impacting the wobble.
Finally, it's not the direction so much as the rate. Yes, we're coming out of an ice age, so we would expect average temperatures to gradually climb. However, what we have seen is that the climb has accelerated. Specifically, it has accelerated during the time that we have become industrialized. That acceleration means that certain effects will be more extreme, and we will have less time to adapt or prepare for them.
This is not just true of the climate, but of any non-linear dynamic system (aka everything). When a system moves from one state to another, there are high frequency effects introduced. The faster the system transitions, the more pronounced those effects are.
The reason they would rather run circles around Trump than invoke the 25th is simple: he still has the support of the Republican electorate (like 85-90% or something).
Their power is tied to Trump, that's why they can't get rid of him.
So yes this is still Deep State. At least until the coward identifies their self so we can see what position they actually hold and when they actually started working in their position.
Great. Since you like applying the principle of "guilty until proven innocent", I'm going to apply it to you. You wrote the article, deep state coward.
Apparently that word is used somewhat frequently by Mike Pence. Although TBH that's also a great way to throw someone off the trail; just pick a few idioms used by someone more visible than you.
The truth maligns Donald Trump, that's the problem you have. You want Google to modify results to suppress the truth that Trump is a terrible President. That is why you, and Trump, hate the truth so much.
Also, if there is no secret, then they are not modifying the search engine, which means Trump is a whiny idiot. But don't worry, that's not a secret or illegal either.
So you are being deliberately obtuse. Definition 2 from Merriam-Webster:
to act in harmony toward a common end
Words have multiple definitions because they have multiple meanings. Also, if it's not illegal and it's not secret (so you claim), then who gives a flying fuck anyway? What is your bloody point?
Slashdot Mirror
"Sorry, it's against our religious views to serve Nazis."
-Twitter
I assume you are talking about this post.
They surveyed people in the Republican party... and then later they surveyed people in the Republican party. Whether the people are the same and the views have changed, or the views are the same but the people have changed, is irrelevant. It's still a survey of the Republican party.
Your timeline is too small. 2016-2018 is still higher than everything before it, thus the trend is still upwards.
Total self-promotion here. Yes, we can!
http://www.mage-networks.com/
Yeah but it still happens in only one direction at a time.
I'm not really sure what the distinction between "logic" and "intuition" in this case is...
I disagree that it's easy to imagine what an atom looks like. If I scaled up an atom of hydrogen so that it was 1m across (instead of 10^-10 m), you wouldn't see anything because the nucleus and the electron would still be microscopic. It certainly won't look anything like this.
The Earth is a non-inertial reference frame. When you attempt to view the Solar System from this frame, you will have to introduce fictitious forces to account for the fact that the reference frame you chose is actually accelerating.
So it's not quite as simple as you make it out to be.
You're right. Next time I'll need a second one just for you. :)
I don't really know why people get hung up on the fact that QM is non-intuitive. There are many macroscopic physical phenomena that also defy intuition.
I see the Sun move across the sky every day, but I don't feel the Earth move at all. Intuitively the Sun must orbit the Earth, right? Except that overwhelming evidence beyond my own measly human observation has shown that in fact, the Earth orbits the Sun.*
QM is exactly the same. It defies intuition, but the evidence backs it up. There is no reason to expect the laws of nature to be intuitive.
*inb4 all the smart-asses who want to point out that they both orbit a common center of mass :P
Lol, AC it's pretty clear from this post that the only "consenting legal age woman" you've ever been around is your own mother.
why do they state that the earth is still coming out of the ice age?
Why didn't you respond to my reply, where I explain exactly why you misunderstood what the article was saying?
Of course, you don't have to be convinced by my comment, but at least we could continue the discussion.
Unless you just comment because you like hearing the sound of your own voice (so to speak)?
I don't understand. You don't believe that ice melting can wobble the Earth, or you don't believe that the ice melted because of humans?
Also, can you describe the mechanism by which anomalies in Earth's magnetic field impact climate change?
They are speaking of 2 different effects, both caused by the melting of ice.
The first effect is due to how the land responds to the ice melting. This continues long after the ice has melted, because the land does not decompress instantly. This is not (really) about glaciers that are melting today, the land is rebounding from glaciers which melted millennia ago.
The second effect is due simply to the loss of the ice itself. As stated in TFS, the 7500Gtons is only over the last 100 years. That much mass loss in a fairly localized area was enough to make a significant contribution to the movement of Earth's center of mass, impacting the wobble.
Finally, it's not the direction so much as the rate. Yes, we're coming out of an ice age, so we would expect average temperatures to gradually climb. However, what we have seen is that the climb has accelerated. Specifically, it has accelerated during the time that we have become industrialized. That acceleration means that certain effects will be more extreme, and we will have less time to adapt or prepare for them.
This is not just true of the climate, but of any non-linear dynamic system (aka everything). When a system moves from one state to another, there are high frequency effects introduced. The faster the system transitions, the more pronounced those effects are.
The reason they would rather run circles around Trump than invoke the 25th is simple: he still has the support of the Republican electorate (like 85-90% or something).
Their power is tied to Trump, that's why they can't get rid of him.
Invoking the 25th Amendment isn't a "coup".
Harry Reid is a part of the MSM?
So yes this is still Deep State. At least until the coward identifies their self so we can see what position they actually hold and when they actually started working in their position.
Great. Since you like applying the principle of "guilty until proven innocent", I'm going to apply it to you. You wrote the article, deep state coward.
Now prove your innocence.
Apparently that word is used somewhat frequently by Mike Pence. Although TBH that's also a great way to throw someone off the trail; just pick a few idioms used by someone more visible than you.
I'm imagining a federal government full of people who lust for power and money
Like... the President?
The truth maligns Donald Trump, that's the problem you have. You want Google to modify results to suppress the truth that Trump is a terrible President. That is why you, and Trump, hate the truth so much.
And you are still being deliberately obtuse.
Ok, now I understand. You have no idea how a search engine works.
Also, if there is no secret, then they are not modifying the search engine, which means Trump is a whiny idiot. But don't worry, that's not a secret or illegal either.
So you are being deliberately obtuse. Definition 2 from Merriam-Webster:
to act in harmony toward a common end
Words have multiple definitions because they have multiple meanings. Also, if it's not illegal and it's not secret (so you claim), then who gives a flying fuck anyway? What is your bloody point?
It is if because of that conscious bias they are making politically motivated changes to their search engine code! You are being deliberately obtuse.
If it is conscious then it is a conspiracy. You can't have it both ways.