That was just my evil white privileged masculine patriarchal side coming out I suppose. Forgive me. Let me put on some non-threatening glasses and ironic shirt while I sip on my latte and post something clever about how Trump is a racist to all of my Facebook friends. There. Do we all feel safe and progressive now. As for thinking that I'm typical, I don't.
I would happily take a President Camacho over having to deal with a Hillary Clinton. The woman has little chance of beating Trump. She's at a huge disadvantage because she triggers a very negative reaction at the genetic level in the vast majority of males. She sounds like that nagging aunt that you wanted to slap around when you were young. That along with her insane stance on trying to push gun control will doom her by pushing a good number of Democrats over to Trump.
Who stands to gain from such an action? I think Hillary Clinton is the only real answer. She's already gearing up for Trump and I'm sure this isn't the last time that you'll see acts like this being committed by bands of her more extreme followers. It's only a matter of time before some rogue Trump group pulls the same and spray paints Dalek images everywhere to remind us of Hillary's terrifying way of interacting with humans.
Every time the system wants to chisel away at our liberties, they just attach child porn or terrorism to the test and this is sufficient to suppress over 90% of the people from speaking up against it because they don't want to be perceived as supporting pedophiles or ISIS. Is this an effective tool of manipulation that would make Edward Bernays proud or am I just sounding like a 'conspiracy theorist'?
Listen to your cynical side. These tech leaders have just figured out that dressing up like a harmless geek and throwing around feel good speeches is the most effective way to control your environment and win over the people in 2016. I think time will reveal what their true motives are and I wouldn't count on Zuckerberg being the savior that every young person wants to believe he is.
This seems like another attempt at spreading anti-Trump propaganda. It's really no different than CNN giving that obnoxious Ohio protester his own interview yesterday. I didn't watch it but there was no avoiding seeing that neanderthal's face on all of the screens at the airport. I wonder if we'll ever get to a point where media isn't primarily a tool to brainwash people.
Slashdot Mirror
That was just my evil white privileged masculine patriarchal side coming out I suppose. Forgive me. Let me put on some non-threatening glasses and ironic shirt while I sip on my latte and post something clever about how Trump is a racist to all of my Facebook friends. There. Do we all feel safe and progressive now. As for thinking that I'm typical, I don't.
I would happily take a President Camacho over having to deal with a Hillary Clinton. The woman has little chance of beating Trump. She's at a huge disadvantage because she triggers a very negative reaction at the genetic level in the vast majority of males. She sounds like that nagging aunt that you wanted to slap around when you were young. That along with her insane stance on trying to push gun control will doom her by pushing a good number of Democrats over to Trump.
Interesting analysis. Perhaps you should apply for an analyst position on CNN.
That's racist, homophobic, sexist, islamophobic (lowercase intentional) and something negative about trannnies. How dare you sir!
Who stands to gain from such an action? I think Hillary Clinton is the only real answer. She's already gearing up for Trump and I'm sure this isn't the last time that you'll see acts like this being committed by bands of her more extreme followers. It's only a matter of time before some rogue Trump group pulls the same and spray paints Dalek images everywhere to remind us of Hillary's terrifying way of interacting with humans.
Every time the system wants to chisel away at our liberties, they just attach child porn or terrorism to the test and this is sufficient to suppress over 90% of the people from speaking up against it because they don't want to be perceived as supporting pedophiles or ISIS. Is this an effective tool of manipulation that would make Edward Bernays proud or am I just sounding like a 'conspiracy theorist'?
Listen to your cynical side. These tech leaders have just figured out that dressing up like a harmless geek and throwing around feel good speeches is the most effective way to control your environment and win over the people in 2016. I think time will reveal what their true motives are and I wouldn't count on Zuckerberg being the savior that every young person wants to believe he is.
This seems like another attempt at spreading anti-Trump propaganda. It's really no different than CNN giving that obnoxious Ohio protester his own interview yesterday. I didn't watch it but there was no avoiding seeing that neanderthal's face on all of the screens at the airport. I wonder if we'll ever get to a point where media isn't primarily a tool to brainwash people.
Yet more deserving people get left alone aka Hillary and Obama
Agreed.