Slashdot Mirror


Bernie Sanders' Second Life Headquarters Besieged by Trump-Supporting Swastikas (vice.com)

Wagner James Au, writing for Motherboard (edited and condensed):As Donald Trump continues to ride roughshod over much of the United States, there are multiple reports that Trumps' virtual fans are riding roughshod on Bernie Sanders' unofficial headquarters in Second Life as well. Sanders' spot is in the sim (Second Life region) of Caspoli, with a Bernie 2016 banner that can be seen from satellite. It's a Roman-themed hangout space in a peaceful meadow, where Bernie supporters often gather to share news of their favorite candidate. But lately, the place has been besieged by pro-Trump griefers. [...] During a Bernie rally in Second Life, Sanders support group member Macaria Wind goes on, Trump-supporting demons flew around Bernie's rally, endlessly typing "TRUMP! TRUMP! TRUMP!" into text chat.

230 comments

  1. False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like something Bernie would do for sympathy.

    1. Re:False flag? by mrex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, without some evidence that these are actual Trump supporters (whom I imagine don't envision themselves to be appropriately represented by *demon* avatars), this really smells of a Something Awful-style false flag attack.

    2. Re:False flag? by avandesande · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The simpler explanation would be 'troll'

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    3. Re:False flag? by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It sounds like something Linden Lab would do to let people know that Second Life still exists, apparently.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    4. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The corporate media has taken the voice from the people. When you back people into a corner, they fight back.

    5. Re:False flag? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      Or hillary clinton. maybe even the GOP.

      The GOP only hope to stop trump is an contested convention. Or some kind of the 3rd party candidates that needs to take electoral votes so that no ones get's 270.

    6. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to be interesting to see what is on the flash drive he has. He claimed it was something that implicates Hillary. She can still lose of the super delegates vote against her.

    7. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least he was in a TV station so he didn't threaten any innocent people.

    8. Re:False flag? by Bartles · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that. There was the Trump supporter with the stupid hat that yelled the comment in the video where that girl was (deservedly) pepper sprayed. I'm cool with the pepper spraying, but that comment was out of line.

    9. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the best idea, evar. Person appears to have a bomb, may have a deadman switch, so let's shoot him and find out!

    10. Re:False flag? by npslider · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Second Life still exists?!

    11. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to be interesting to see what is on the flash drive he has. He claimed it was something that implicates Hillary. She can still lose of the super delegates vote against her.

      He said it was bigger than the Panama Papers! Hopefully it will be released before the convention.

    12. Re:False flag? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I wanted to be mean and hex Bernie's SL presence, swastikas would be the last thing I would put up. I would poke fun of his platform by doing something like have a set of unicorns chained to a capstan, labeled Bernie's Energy System. Or how about a theme park called Venezuelaland, with hopeless peasants shooting each other over the last few rolls of toilet paper.

    13. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...a theme park called Venezuelaland, with hopeless peasants shooting each other over the last few rolls of toilet paper.

      No, he wants to do it right, not like Venezuela did. That's an unfair comparison.

    14. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love hatin' on Hillary as much as the next person, but I'm going to need a citation on that.

      I mean, aside from the "correct the record" people, but I think that's mostly in response to Hillary criticisms.

    15. Re:False flag? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Bullshit.

      But you're probably right about it being a false-flag operation: it was most likely staged by the Hillary campaign. After all, her campaign already pays shills to spew propaganda on social media sites. With Sanders obviously preparing to exit the race, Hillary is looking ahead to the general election where she'll most likely to fighting Trump, so she's doing her usual dirty tricks to try to make him look bad.

      It could also have been done by the Cruz campaign. After all, they resorted to dirty tricks like this before when they falsely told people at caucuses that Carson had dropped out of the race.

    16. Re:False flag? by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

      I still half-suspect that Clinton asked Trump to run in order to screw up the Republican party so she had a better chance of winning (which explains his "I-don't-give-a-shit-about-electability-or-the-moral-event-horizon" rhetoric), but then the strategy backfired when Trump realized he had an actual shot to win.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:False flag? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most of what's been pinned on Trump supporters has actually been paid and planted people from the Hillary camp, and in a couple of cases Cruz/"establishment" people.

      You are delusional.

      https://img.washingtonpost.com...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    18. Re:False flag? by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      They ALL claim that they're the one who will do it right this time, but none of them ever seems to succeed. Maybe the flaw is not in the method, but in the theory.

      You know what they say about doing the same thing over and over expecting different results.

    19. Re:False flag? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I wanted to be mean and hex Bernie's SL presence, swastikas would be the last thing I would put up.

      But then, you're not some dickhead 8chan/pol type. They would absolutely throw up swastikas, because they're Trump supporters and neo-nazis (I'm sorry, the new term is "ethno-nationalist")

      Not one of them is capable of giving an opinion about Sanders without mentioning that he's Jewish.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:False flag? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most of what's been pinned on Trump supporters has actually been paid and planted people from the Hillary camp

      How about this Trump campaign worker with the Nazi tattoos? Is she a Hillary plant too?

      http://www.nydailynews.com/new...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    21. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like something Linden Lab would do to let people know that Second Life still exists, apparently.

      Second Life still exists?!

      Apparently.

    22. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps it's just a bait from 2006.

    23. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps it's just a bait from "2006 called"

    24. Re:False flag? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I doubt that they are Trump supporters, I don't expect most Trump supporters would be smart enough to even be able to log into Second Life.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    25. Re:False flag? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most of what's been pinned on Trump supporters has actually been paid and planted people from the Hillary camp, and in a couple of cases Cruz/"establishment" people.

      You are delusional.

      https://img.washingtonpost.com...

      How does that picture refute what he says? False flag operations are part and parcel of the looney left. Hell, this just came across the wire today:

      http://college.usatoday.com/20...

    26. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, if I go out and buy a Trump T-Shirt and do the Nazi salute (or whatever it is called), it automatically means it was a Trump supporter? I mean, nobody would ever go out and get a shirt like that and do something like that to make someone else look bad to benefit the person they actually supported.
      Personally I think ALL of the candidates campaigns are capable and willing to do just that.

      On a side note, can we please add "None of the above" to the ballot?

    27. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's all very Clintonesque.

    28. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ! Is that the last time I gave a damn about Second Life? 2006?!

    29. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And McCain had a fundraiser who had a meth lab in her home. Let's blame the candidate for anything one of their fans does!

      Maybe I should go around saying "I love PopeRatzo" while kicking puppies and wearing a shirt with pictures of dead babies on it. By your logic, it's a reflection of YOUR character, right?

    30. Re:False flag? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      You mean, Second Life has a lower bound on user IQ too? Now that's something new. It's hardly above Facebook!

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    31. Re:False flag? by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      It sounds like something Linden Lab would do to let people know that Second Life still exists, apparently.

      Until I noticed that it was his "unofficial" headquarters (#), I was surprised that politicians like Sanders were even bothering with something whose cyber-savvy-bandwagon-jumping potential peaked a decade ago and which most people have almost forgotten existed.

      Thing is, even then I saw no real evidence that its latest-hot-thing media prominence was matched by the number of people actually using it, no sign that it was remotely mass-market popular in the way that Twitter and Facebook became (or even that MySpace once was). It was something that the media latched on to as the next big thing (with various bandwagon-jumping celebs, etc who wanted to be seen at the cutting edge of the glorious cyber-future in turn associating themselves with it.)

      I think this is partly because it fulfilled a vision of what "cyberspace" was expected to become- a combination of the online future and the fulfilment of 90s virtual reality promises (sort of). It was also the sort of thing that lent itself to journalistic pontificating about identity, amusing incidents, et al.

      And I think that the media- which wasn't as tech-savvy or clever as it liked to think, particularly back then- was so wrapped up in this and paranoid about missing the boat on the next big thing that they were just a bit too keen to jump on the Second Life bandwagon. At least until it became clear that most people didn't care about it and never would. Not to say that it was unsuccessful, just that it was never going to appeal in the "every man and his dog" way that Facebook did.

      Anyway, is the latest incident a publicity stunt? Who knows. At any rate, it smacks more of trolling- a has-been echoing of the infamous "flying penis" stunt of its heyday- than actual Trump supporters. Personally, Second Life is something that would have sounded incredibly cool and desirable to me when I was in my early to mid teens (and even Habitat would have impressed me), but by the time it actually came along it seemed less desirable (as does VR to me now), to the point I've never actually used it.

      If people enjoy playing around with their avatars, that's fine for them, but the idea of walking through a boring- and by now, dated-looking- landscape interacting with lifeless uncanny valley mannequin fantasies (that look nothing like the actual people behind them) appeals to me even less than it did ten years ago.

      (#) i.e. Nothing to do with him per se, just a bunch of people who were probably using Second Life anyway that happen to be Sanders supporters, I'm assuming.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    32. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something something Netcraft.....

    33. Re:False flag? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Now get off my Second Life lawn!

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    34. Re:False flag? by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not one for conspiracy theories, but I confess this is one I have a hard time completely dismissing. He's literally pulling the party to pieces, and with his own real competitor (and not even much of that anymore) being a vile sociopathic hard right troll named Ted Cruz, if this wasn't a secret plot to completely fuck over the Republicans, then Hillary Clinton may very well be the luckiest Presidential candidate in modern times.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    35. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ted Cruz pointed this out when he autographed a troll's copy of The Communist Manifesto.

    36. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      I suppose '92 Republican presidential hopeful and noted white supremacist David Duke was put up to endorsing Trump by Democratic party operatives. Your reality sounds really soft and cushy with all those pesky sharp corners filed off.

    37. Re:False flag? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2

      Given the backfiring plus the unexpected competitiveness of Bernie Sanders (not to mention stuff like the still-possibly-pending email indictment), I'd say Clinton might be an exceptionally unlucky candidate! I mean, considering how much of a shoe-in the media declared her to be back six months ago (let alone in 2012), how much worse could she have possibly fucked it up than she has?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    38. Re:False flag? by pecosdave · · Score: 1

      Since I have so many asking for some evidence of this sort of thing:

      http://www.wnd.com/2016/02/des...

      https://theconservativetreehou...

      http://www.washingtonsblog.com...

      http://redstatewatcher.com/art...

      Generally the first thing I hear is an attack on source - all of them if possible. That's just someone who's established a position and has made up their mind no matter what. Usually I try to get both left and right wing sources when I'm trying to give evidence to a point. It's a little harder to do it this time since, with the exception of possibly some websites that support Bernie and want to defend him against the framing he's gotten of astroturfers marching against Trump in his name there's not going to be many left-wing outlets exposing their bread and butter.

      I'm not a Trump supporter BTW, I've been voting Libertarian for quite a while and I intend to again. I was even a delegate to the state convention, and the only reason I'm not going to the national convention is economic - I need to work and not spend money on trips to Florida. Perhaps next time.

      --
      The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
    39. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's wait for the general election campaign. Trump probably will have more to say about Hillary and the Clinton Crime Family when the time for that comes. I can't wait for the debates, although I can see Hillary trying to wiggle out of there being any debates. "He's just uncivilized! I have no issues to discuss with him!"

    40. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. They're loser 4chan trolls, noy really politically aware enough to support any candidate.

      It's fun, though to stereotype them as being typical Trump supporters. Don't let the bus run ypu over, clueless fucks. Just believe what your masters say about their opponents. Oh wait, do those treadmarks hurt?

    41. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy sacred cows! An actual lunatic!

    42. Re: False flag? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      David Duke never endorsed trump.

      I would imagine that the misinformation about what was said and your beliefs that there was actually an endorsement is the result of the democratic party though.

    43. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "TRUMp TRUmP TRuMP TrUMP tRUMP TRUMP"

    44. Re:False flag? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right, I must have sunk three whole hours into SL before losing the will to live there.

    45. Re:False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely. /pol/, Stormfront and /r/the_donald are actually all Hillary Clinton supporters.

    46. Re: False flag? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I suppose '92 Republican presidential hopeful and noted white supremacist David Duke was put up to endorsing Trump by Democratic party operatives. Your reality sounds really soft and cushy with all those pesky sharp corners filed off.

      What does that have to do with it? Do you really think someone as polished as David Duke (note that I don't say this in an approving manner) would be so crass as to give a Nazi salute? I highly doubt the picture is an actual Trump supporter, regardless of all that. It looks like a lefty trying to make Trump look bad.

      Same with the 2nd Life griefing. Do you really think actual Trump supporters are using Nazi imagery? Doubtful. I'm not saying there aren't neo-nazis supporting current candidates, Trump included, just saying that most of them are smart enough to keep it toned down.

    47. Re:False flag? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      I forgot that Second Life even existed, for at least two years but probably more, until I read this.

    48. Re:False flag? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I think a good portion of the users are just there to look at crude 3D porn and semi-literate roleplays now.

    49. Re:False flag? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Or it's just trolls who don't support either candidate but are just selecting the most provocative subject for trolling purposes.
      I doubt any genuine trump supporters would want to associate trump with hitler.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    50. Re:False flag? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

      It could also just be good old-fashioned trolling. Trump upsets a lot of people, so if I wanted to troll people who support other candidates, I'd pretend to be a Trump supporter too. And then feel dirty afterwards.

      --
      Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
    51. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It ended up being a snickers bar wrapped in aluminum foil.

    52. Re: False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We found the neo nazi and trump supporter boys. Let's dox him
      .

    53. Re:False flag? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That was my reaction to the headline. "Second Life is still around? Huh?"

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    54. Re:False flag? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Which theory is flawed? Obviously, Marxism doesn't work, I think most of us can agree. What Sanders wants is nowhere near Marxism, but something like many Western European countries have, and those countries seem to be doing pretty well in general. One thing I like about Sanders is that he explains the economics of his platform in reasonable detail, showing where he'd get the money for free college tuition, etc. The utopians (like Marx) generally assume that everything's going to work, and don't get into specifics.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    55. Re:False flag? by Another+Mouse+Coward · · Score: 1

      Plus-5 for the insightful comment _I_ was going to make! :D

  2. ....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by OutOnARock · · Score: 5, Insightful

    who knew?

    1. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's actually the real news here.

    2. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      Both they and Sanders are begging for attention. It's almost sad to watch. The democrats are desperately trying to keep people interested. But what's left to say about Clinton that we don't already know? They should switch their focus to congress, so even if Trump wins he won't get past them.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But what's left to say about Clinton that we don't already know?

      The sentencing.

    4. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      Well, some people claim slashdot is still a thing as well... Turns out there are still fans of just about anything you can think of.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    5. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It doesn't work that way. The problem is that the Presidential election is normally how Democrats get voters to come vote for Congresspeople; it's largely why they do so poorly in the mid-term elections.

      Bernie is the one who's actually gotten the youth excited about voting; there's some strong parallels between his campaign and Obama's in 2008. Obama won largely because the Democrats got the young voters to turn out, after being inspired by his speeches. However, this didn't quite happen this time: they were inspired by Bernie (but this time there's actually substance because Bernie actually has a long track record in Congress supporting his rhetoric, unlike Obama; the youth learned this lesson), but apparently not enough to win the Primaries for various reasons (too many voters thinking Hillary is "entitled" to be President, dirty tricks by the DNC to help Hillary, blatant fraud in some of the primaries such as Illinois where hand recounts proved the machines lied).

      What could quite possibly happen is that, with the DNC coronating Hillary and pushing Bernie aside, the young voters will be pissed off and disillusioned, and not bother voting. This means the Dems will lose Congressional seats too. The DNC has really shot itself in the foot here IMO. Only appealing to dried-up retirement-age feminists and conservative blacks and then adopting a condescending tone towards the 35-and-under crowd is not a recipe for success in the general election, unless they've engineered some fraudulent results with the voting machines in many places.

      The Democratic Party's biggest problem is voter apathy. They try to pitch themselves as the party for left-leaning (and farther left) voters, minorities, working and lower classes, etc. But then when in office they just kowtow to their big corporate donors, mainly Wall Street and Hollywood, and then whine about how they can't get anything done even when they have control of Congress and the White House, and adopt very centrist and pro-corporate policies. This isn't inspiring to the people they claim to represent, and definitely isn't inspiring to young people who are more idealistic. Polls show that Hillary is downright despised by these young voters. So I really don't see this turning out well for the Dems.

    6. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they shouldn't have rigged the primary in favor of such a loser. She's only polling 3% above Trump right now and that's before she's had to deal with any real mud slinging.

      She's literally had to make shit up to distract from the fact that she has no substance at all. She's bitched about being called out for things she's said, I can only imagine what the reaction is going to be when she's up against the GOP candidate and they're actually being mean to her.

      In this case, it's highly likely that the defacing was done by Clinton's army of professional trolls as a false flag. We already know that she's engaged in dirty politics and paying professional trolls, so that would hardly be a shocker.

    7. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The apathy is because we vote for their candidates and they turn around and screw us over. Obamacare was really well appreciated, but he didn't really get much else done, the things he did get done were drastically scaled back and his foreign policy wasn't anywhere near good enough.

      I can't blame the other Democrats for being apathetic when the party is so uninterested in earning our votes or pushing for real change. Bernie gets that, he also gets that unless Clinton makes some very real steps in the right direction that his endorsement of her is going to be meaningless. It's not like in 2008 when Hillary was promising similar things to what Obama was promising.

    8. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's bitched about being called out for things she's said, I can only imagine what the reaction is going to be when she's up against the GOP candidate and they're actually being mean to her.

      It'll be the '90's all over again, where she whines 24/7 about the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy(TM).

    9. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Raises hand). Wouldn't have known that Second Life still existed 12 months ago. But, then my aunt died. She had a roommate/near-squatter living in her basement that I had to evict. (She was going to squat there until eviction day came). Late 50s "bag lady". On disability. Absolutely did not shower once in the two months I had to deal with her. Chain smoker. Mild schizophrenia? Getting worse? And spends 20 hours a day on Second Life where she's as desirable as she might ever want to be.

      From some research, apparently that's pretty much the core demographic hanging around the remnants of Second Life.

    10. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The apathy is because we vote for their candidates and they turn around and screw us over. Obamacare was really well appreciated, but he didn't really get much else done,

      It's also been a punch in the nuts to the middle class, which has seen health care costs skyrocket, as usual. Meanwhile, the rich get to opt out in one way or another, and the poor get some shitty, substandard health care and feel grateful for it. Since the middle class is at its smallest size since... what was that depressing thing called again? I guess that won't affect voting much. Meanwhile, it should galvanize the poor, who think they're getting a great deal when they get the equivalent of table scraps of the rich, but taken from the middle class.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by shani · · Score: 1

      The apathy is because we vote for their candidates and they turn around and screw us over. Obamacare was really well appreciated, but he didn't really get much else done,

      It's also been a punch in the nuts to the middle class, which has seen health care costs skyrocket, as usual. Meanwhile, the rich get to opt out in one way or another, and the poor get some shitty, substandard health care and feel grateful for it. Since the middle class is at its smallest size since... what was that depressing thing called again? I guess that won't affect voting much. Meanwhile, it should galvanize the poor, who think they're getting a great deal when they get the equivalent of table scraps of the rich, but taken from the middle class.

      When Obama took office, there were two problems with medical care in the US:

      1. Access
      2. Cost

      He decided to tackle access, and has basically succeeded at that. He decided to ignore cost, and things have not gotten better.

      I think this was actually probably the correct move. Once people have had access to medical care for a while, taking it away will be difficult, so it was essential that this be done early.

      The cost problem will need to be solved, and it will continue to get worse until no matter how conservative you are as a politician you will need to help fix it.

    12. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit, next thing you'll tell me is that people are still playing World of Warcraft.

    13. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha just what I was thinking.

    14. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      He got access in his first two years, and then had no chance of improving the ACA for six. A Democratic president with at Democratic congress could actually change it in a meaningful way.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    15. Re:....wait....SecondLife is still a thing? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In what way have the Republicans not been mean to her so far? They weren't content with a mere dozen Benghazi hearings, and never could find any actual wrongdoing on her part.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  3. I used to spend a lot of time there... by ZorinLynx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's somewhat comforting to know that nothing has changed in ten years. :)

    1. Re:I used to spend a lot of time there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They had a Sanders '16 campaign HQ in '06?

  4. What a time to be alive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Politics in the 21st century, folks. It's only going to get weirder.

  5. Joe job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swastikas sound just a tad suspicious, innit?

    1. Re:Joe job? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Swastikas sound just a tad suspicious, innit?

      Not at all. The Trump campaign is littered with nazis:

      http://fortune.com/donald-trum...

      Also, who could forget this nice lady working for the Trump campaign with stormfront tattoos and "88" tattooed on her hand.:

      http://www.nydailynews.com/new...

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Joe job? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1
      I've stated before that I can't recall a single thing that candidate Drumpf has said that I agree with. If he were to somehow take the election I would almost certainly move to Canada. That said, I really don't think that Drumpf supporters with the intelligence to use second life (which isn't much but his supporters are almost never the sharpest tools in the shed) would be dumb enough to wrap themselves in the swastika.

      Swastikas sound just a tad suspicious, innit?

      Not at all. The Trump campaign is littered with nazis:

      Indeed, they attract more nuts per capita than any other campaign, and by a long shot. However the flag they showed in the sl screen shot is rather unique. I searched the google (images) for it and found only one similar one, which has been pasted in quite a few places. I would wager that most of the solid neo-nazis in the Drumpf camp are too solidly knuckle-dragging to be able to stitch those images together and convince themselves it is a good idea.

      Also, who could forget this nice lady working for the Trump campaign with stormfront tattoos and "88" tattooed on her hand.:

      I believe I saw her on Jon Oliver. Indeed she's a nutter.

      Another reason why I don't think his campaign would have actually done this is because the swastika is almost universally accepted as a sign of anti-semitism. Drumpf is anti-lots-of-stuff but I've never heard him take a stance against Jews (not to say that he wouldn't). It does get used occasionally in other displays of white supremacy but not as often.

      I do think someone did this just to make Drumpf look bad. Not that such a feat is difficult, but I think they went for it anyways.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  6. False flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even Drumpf supporters aren't dense enough to think this is a good idea.

  7. Build a wall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Build a wall to block him out. Oh, the irony.

  8. The Cycle Continues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Trolls still exist in online media. Film at 11.

  9. Sure..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    However, to put it in perspective...
    Second lifers get griefed by Trump folks
    Meanwhile, in real life, Berners get violent and try to suppress the first amendment rights at Trump Rallies.

    Which is worse?

  10. Doubtful by bsharitt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are two things I find unlikely about this story.

    1. That Second Life is still a thing.
    2. That these are actual Trump supporters.

    It's just trolls getting a two-for-one deal. They get to disrupt the Bernie supporters while at the same time painting Trump supporters in a bad(worse?) light.

    1. Re:Doubtful by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      "Bernie supporters" may as well disperse, unless a few hundred of them want to run for congress to rout out the incumbents.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Doubtful by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, its unlikely these where Trump supporters. The use of the Swastika would not be something that a real supporter would want associated with Trump.

      So the question is who would benefit from something like this?

      I've got two suspects right off the top of my head, in order of likely hood;
      supporters of Hillary or supporters of Cruz.

    3. Re:Doubtful by SirSlud · · Score: 1

      The use of the Swastika would not be something that a real supporter would want associated with Trump.

      Ah, the old "No True Stormfront User" argument. Pretty darn naive.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    4. Re:Doubtful by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      The use of the Swastika would not be something that a real supporter would want associated with Trump.

      Ah, the old "No True Stormfront User" argument. Pretty darn naive.

      Taking the story at face value is also pretty naive.
      Most people saw how Trump not instantly condemning the klan (even though he did so many times before and after) hurt him. Any supporter of his, even if they were zombie nazis, would know to keep that part under the radar.

      Trump is in fact backing Bernie saying that Bernie is being screwed out of winning the primaries by Hillary and the democrat party.

    5. Re:Doubtful by foradoxium · · Score: 1

      for certain things SL is still very much a thing. Like music.

      will give you #2 though. SL is the internet, people troll just for fun. I personally would have gone in as Cthulu to voice support for Trump.

    6. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The use of the Swastika would not be something that a real supporter would want associated with Trump.

      You think that because you, rightly, view the Swastika as a negative symbol. But those tiny-brained gerbil humpers view it as a positive thing, and would not hesitate to associate it with whatever else they supported.

    7. Re:Doubtful by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Trump is in fact backing Bernie saying that Bernie is being screwed out of winning the primaries by Hillary and the democrat party.

      Trump was right on the money with that comment, however I wouldn't call it "backing Bernie": he could very well want to see Bernie run as an independent in order to "split the vote".

    8. Re:Doubtful by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      That's EXACTLY what Trump wants.

      Much as it pains me to say it, the only way Sanders should mount an independent run is if Trump ends up running as an independent due to GOP finding a way to deny him the nomination.

      Jane Sanders gave an interview where she discussed Trump's campaign advice...

      http://www.salon.com/2016/04/2...

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    9. Re:Doubtful by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      "Pretty darn naive."

      Yeah, recent events in my life have kept me from really keeping up to speed on everything that is going on in the world.

      So what is your take on this story? From your comment I get the impression that you feel you have a better grasp on whats going on.

      Or am I just being naive again thinking you know what your talking about? :)

      (but seriously, that do you think about it?)

    10. Re:Doubtful by thunderclap · · Score: 1

      Oh second Life is still a thing. As for number two well that I dont know.

    11. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, its unlikely these where Trump supporters. The use of the Swastika would not be something that a real supporter would want associated with Trump.

      Did you happen to miss the story where people in a Trump call center were being interviewed, and a viewer happen to notice that the Trump volunteer was sporting white supremacist tattoos?

       

    12. Re:Doubtful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out one other likely alternative:

      Other Sanders supporters.

    13. Re:Doubtful by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      My main suspects are just Internet assholes. There are certainly enough of them who'd like to throw swastikas at a Jew and who would virtually yell things to annoy other people.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  11. Is this the OASIS? by Keiran+Halcyon · · Score: 1

    Having just re-read Ready Player One not too long ago, I began to take stock of the things that I could see developing in the not-distant future of the ever-present online society and then comparing them to their OASIS counter-parts. Every now and again you see something as ridiculous as this, and you realize that if the technology was just that little tiny bit better, it wouldn't be science fiction after that.

    1. Re:Is this the OASIS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud your will and determination to be able to read past the first page.

    2. Re:Is this the OASIS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud your will and determination to be able to read past the first page.

      It was a NYT best seller and won multiple awards. I have only heard positive reviews and also enjoyed it myself.

      This suggests to me that you should seriously consider the possibility that the problem might be at your end.

    3. Re:Is this the OASIS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I applaud your will and determination to be able to read past the first page.

      It was a NYT best seller and won multiple awards. I have only heard positive reviews and also enjoyed it myself.

      This suggests to me that you should seriously consider the possibility that the problem might be at your end.

      Different AC here.
      To be fair, I read and kind of liked RPOne. That in no way makes it a GOOD book - it is easy to enjoy something that panders to your Jr High self(coughEndersGamecough) . Aside from the numerous MAC truck sized holes, there's the old "hand waived the hook for a sequel" in the middle where they make him an employee and had him sign away rights to the prize. That was Hobbit "Look for this QuickTime sequence int he video game" scenes bad.

      For a better version, try Rick Cook's old programmer as magic and Christopher Stashaff's "Escape Velocity" and subsequent Warlock in spite of himself books.

  12. Wagner James Au by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yea, that second life guy. The one who is desperate for it to stay relevant and probably did this himself so he could write a blog post about it. That guy.

  13. Swastikas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much do you wanna bet that any swastikas are made by Bernie's people just so they can blame evil Trump supports.

  14. Second Life still exists? by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are we sure that all of this wasn't a PR stunt designed to let people know that Second Life is still a thing that apparently still exists?

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:Second Life still exists? by fustakrakich · · Score: 0

      It's a democrat attempt to keep their rhetoric on the front page. Their campaign is dead without Sanders. There's nothing interesting about Hillary worth talking about. She just needs to say, "I'm not Trump" for the next six months.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:Second Life still exists? by npslider · · Score: 1

      The few people still there, just came out for the first time, and learned that Gore had lost the election. They promptly returned.

  15. False flag by Tailhook · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Swastikas?

    Dear libtards, try not be be so obvious.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:False flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes a troll is just a troll.

      Anyone naive enough to read a party platform into this is probably not skilled enough in critical thinking to use the internet unsupervised.

  16. Immediately Skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah right.
    Probably Bernie supporters.

  17. The Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did shit that people do in a video game become news?

  18. Re:Most of swastikas are false flag by kamapuaa · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, you accidentally quoted Metapedia and expected to be taken seriously.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  19. The Internet is full of jackasses... by markhb · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, water is wet.

    --
    Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    1. Re:The Internet is full of jackasses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah sure. And fire isnt hot, it just makes other things hot.

  20. Naw, just trolls looking for attention by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Informative

    Worked too.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  21. Why the fuck is /. wasting our time with this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I want to know is why /. is wasting our time with such a stupid submission.

    Come on! As I look through the Firehose, I see numerous stories far more relevant, interesting and newsworthy than this pathetic one is.

    And don't suggest that I submit stories. I tried that, and they must have been too relevant or something (they had to do with computing), because they ended up silently discarded. I'm not going to waste my time doing that again!

    Editors, can we please avoid these pointless political submissions? Yeah, they generate a lot of comments, but they're typically useless comments. They're a lot like YouTube comments or Twitter tweets; they're voluminous but extremely low-quality comments. They're far more harmful to Slashdot than they are beneficial.

    1. Re:Why the fuck is /. wasting our time with this?! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Come on! As I look through the Firehose, I see numerous stories far more relevant, interesting and newsworthy than this pathetic one is.

      Which ones?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Why the fuck is /. wasting our time with this?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they generate a lot of comments, but they're typically useless comments.

      They generate a lot of ad impressions, you mean. That's money in the bank, baby. Cha-ching!

    3. Re:Why the fuck is /. wasting our time with this?! by sumdumass · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about the one where I kept getting killed by some idiot who would camp at the spawn points? Or how about the one where my neighbor got duped out of a bastard sword or whatever.

      I mean seriously , this story isn't much more than people being mean in a game. Does slashdot need its safe space or something?

    4. Re:Why the fuck is /. wasting our time with this?! by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I mean seriously , this story isn't much more than people being mean in a game

      Good summary lol

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  22. Who cares about 2nd life??? by joao.cordeiro · · Score: 1

    This news should be on a 2nd life newspaper and commented on 2nd life slashdot. This is like saying that a player nicknamed trump got headshoted on a csgo game...

    1. Re:Who cares about 2nd life??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This news should be on a 2nd life newspaper and commented on 2nd life slashdot.

      This is like saying that a player nicknamed trump got headshoted on a csgo game...

      No, that's a Cruz win headline. The Trump version is total party kill via TK.

    2. Re:Who cares about 2nd life??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got a video?

      Pretty sure that a summary of that story would get published here these days.

  23. Re: Why the fuck is /. wasting our time with this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, it's not that bad.

    Demons flying overhead with Trump banners? The summary made the mental imagery absolutely hilarious.

    I never new Sanders' group had a virtual presence like that. Anyone check on what 4chan's b-tards were up to at the time? This sounds like their style.

  24. Ride roughshod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "As Donald Trump continues to ride roughshod over much of the United States..."

    Sorry? I thought that voters were choosing him democratically?

    I forgot that, for Slashdot readers, anything they disagree with is automatically evil...

  25. Good PR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bernie Sanders must be so happy about this. This is awesome publicity for his campaign plus it looks horrible for this Trumpf person. Win-win.

  26. Strange... by npslider · · Score: 1, Troll

    I didn't think Trump supporters were smart enough to know of or use Second Life!

    *ducks

    Only kidding! But seriously folks...

    1. Re:Strange... by chispito · · Score: 1

      I didn't think Trump supporters were smart enough to know of or use Second Life!

      *ducks

      Only kidding! But seriously folks...

      Smart enough? I'm pretty sure the only winning move is not to play.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:Strange... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Just remember in Second Life there are no winners but there are losers.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  27. Wheee by Quzak · · Score: 2

    I felt the Bern once. A quick trip to the doctor and a round of antibiotics fixed it right up. Seriously, don't go near the strippers...they nasty.

    --
    Support your local school shooter, give them your firearms.
  28. Re:Most of swastikas are false flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, I'm sure he goes there for all his neo-nazi slanted ideas.

  29. Am I just too old? by drew_kime · · Score: 1

    Am I old, or do most young people find this fucking ridiculous, too?

    --
    Nope, no sig
    1. Re:Am I just too old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Young people don't even use "Second Life", grandpa.

  30. I can see Palpatine urging the dark side. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see Palpatine (VI of course) urging the fall of slashdot to the dark side. The fall to tabloid journalism is well underway.

  31. Nazi flags by Bernie supporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are among the most vile scum there is.

  32. Sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the things anti-Trump people have been doing in real life

  33. Satire, not "Supporters" or "False Flag" by eepok · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No Trump supporter would associate Trumps campaign with a swastika. That would hurt Trump's campaign. The same goes for anyone attempting a false flag attack.

    Instead, this was done by people satirizing Trump supporters as brash bullies and mocking Trump's rhetoric as Nazi-reminiscent.

    It's not a hard distinction to understand, but apparently the article's author had some difficulty making the connection.

    1. Re:Satire, not "Supporters" or "False Flag" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's not as though Trump were endorsed by someone like David Duke, after all. Oh wait...

    2. Re:Satire, not "Supporters" or "False Flag" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Trump supporter would associate Trumps campaign with a swastika. That would hurt Trump's campaign.

      What makes you think racists think they should be ashamed of being racist in a crowd of people cheering the racist on stage? Or are you delusional enough to think every racist is a media savvy, long term, forward thinking, non-reactionary, long term goal oriented person who will have the self control to avoid mob mentality?

    3. Re:Satire, not "Supporters" or "False Flag" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      AC: If the New Black Panthers supported Barack Obama, would that mean... (oh snap, your entire argument fell apart!)

  34. FU Censors by s.petry · · Score: 1

    That was funny!

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:FU Censors by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      I suppose, since the pardon, should it be necessary to use, has already been drawn up. An indictment won't last all of five seconds.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    2. Re:FU Censors by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      This is possible, however if Obama pardons her, that's going to (IMO) guarantee she'll lose the election.

      Again IMO, it'd be a lot smarter for the Democratic Party to figure out how to get rid of Hillary and nominate Bernie, because he doesn't have all this baggage, and polls much better among general voters than Hillary does, and he'll also get the under-35 crowd to show up to vote for him (and other Dem seats). But with DWS and friends running the DNC, I don't see this happening. I think we can look forward to 8 years of Republicans controlling both Congress and the White House, and if that happens, we'll be lucky if Trump is the Pres since he's not very conservative like Cruz is.

    3. Re:FU Censors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be far smarter, Bernie is up double digits against Trump and I think only Kasich is capable of beating him in the GE.

      But, they've been rigging things in her favor for so long now that I don't think they can walk it back and give the nomination to the guy who clearly deserves it. Even with all the advantages and cheating that's been done for Hillary, she's still struggling to put him away. If we're going to have super delegates that aren't required to vote one way or another, this is exactly the time to use them to correct the mistake.

      She's basically up on Trump by about 3% right now, I doubt that number is going to improve when the GOP candidate starts to actually target her rather than each other. Bernie's double digit lead probably won't hold, but it's a much better place to start than basically tied and being disliked by most voters. It gets even better if the GOP figures out how to deprive Trump of his rightful nomination. Those folks are far more likely to go for Sanders than for Clinton.

    4. Re:FU Censors by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The US elections will be fascinating to watch. We have already seen the corruption with Democrats and Republicans, with purging of polls and shutting down polling stations in areas where they do not get votes. The laughable part because they are both as corrupt and corporate controlled as each other, they can not honestly complain about each other, (they have both proven that with blatant electoral scams), it will be an ugly screaming match and enormously long voting queue (idea being, to crowded for you to vote today, come back tomorrow, snigger, snigger). The world is watching and laughing and trust the US, not bloody likely, it's own electorate can no longer trust their own government after blatant electoral scams, why should the rest of the world after watching the election debacle and it will only get worse.

      This story is interesting because it points out how far those corrupt influences will spread and the actions they will take. The Trump move, was it done to win people over to Trump (clear failure) or was it an early Clinton trial to test ways to alienate voters against their competitor (clear success, especially taking into account Clinton's million dollar paid troll army, expect more of the same) for hundreds of millions of dollars in corporate bribes, even billions, once they scam their way into office. They also purposefully censored groups on face book by planting threats and porn, expect many, many more cyber false flags (can not win on a forum, then shut it down).

      They only clean candidate is now Dr Jill Stein, good luck with that with both Democrats and Republicans actively working together to ensure Dr Jill Stein gets as few votes as possible.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    5. Re:FU Censors by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Every bit of dirt the Republicans can throw at Hillary has been thrown. Every bit of sawdust that they could spray-paint in a dirt-like color has been thrown. They can't find more dirt. They haven't really started against Bernie, so I don't think the polls reflect what would happen in November.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  35. MOD PARENT UP by damn_registrars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't respect Drumpf or any part of his campaign but I have yet to see a Drumpf supporter embrace a swastika as a symbol of their campaign. They might not be the sharpest tools in the shed but even they know better than to venture down that road...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except for the KKK support endorsement...

      but trump supporters like to ignore that one...

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      Exactly. This is a false-flag operation by either Hillary or Cruz or the GOP.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely by Anonymous. Pretty sure the other candidates you mentioned have higher priorities than Second Life.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Democrats have had people who held federal office that were associated with terrorism, white supremacy and a certain man who let a girl die in his car while he went to sober up...

      But Democrats like to ignore those folks (until they can skirt their past and make them seem like martyrs for the cause)

    5. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well it isn't like the KKK also endorsed Hillary.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  36. well..at least this is an honest posting by foradoxium · · Score: 3

    "As Donald Trump continues to ride roughshod over much of the United States,"

    There's nothing like opening up with a preamble showing your bias..

    1. Re:well..at least this is an honest posting by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I don't think you realize the extent of the activities of Nazi brownshirts. I have no respect for Trump or many of his followers, but let's keep a little perspective.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    2. Re:well..at least this is an honest posting by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      I do, actually. They started off, though, pretty much like Trump's more avid supporters and his "security" people. They don't like different opinions, and they're willing to get violent to suppress them. The Nazi brownshirts' behaviour changed for the worse as they became more powerful. Do you really think Trump's animals wouldn't be out there kicking people to death if they thought they could get away with it?

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    3. Re: well..at least this is an honest posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you give five incidents of trump supporters violently suppressing protected speech?

  37. This is definitely news for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I can't see how this is stuff that matters.

  38. Oh the stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet the precious little snowflakes were triggered

  39. Expect more of the guilting by association by Trachman · · Score: 2

    Many of the Bernie supporters spend a lot of time with computers and on the internets.

    Expect more and more association by guilt. I will not be voting for Trump (I will not be voting for anyone, as a matter of principle), but trying to tie Trump is with nazis is absurd.

    I am also getting sense, that anyone who is perceived as Trump leaning gets zero pointed here /. pronto.

    1. Re:Expect more of the guilting by association by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big surprise, would you expect pro-Trump discussion to be "insightful"?

  40. Re:BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your literal-minded style of contrarian argumentation is symptomatic of an underlying mental illness.

  41. After indictment there will be conviction by mi · · Score: 1

    I suppose, since the pardon, should it be necessary to use, has already been drawn up. An indictment won't last all of five seconds.

    I'm pretty sure, a pardon can not be issued before conviction (and sentencing) — quite a bit more seconds will last between a indictment and that.

    In fact, one suspects, Obama is throttling the FBI now to ensure, the conviction happens after the President's time in office so that he wouldn't be in the unfortunate position of having — out of party collegiality — to pardon a crook she despises.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:After indictment there will be conviction by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Nixon was pardoned by Ford before he was indicted.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    2. Re:After indictment there will be conviction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nina Meyers was pardoned by President Palmer before killing Jack Bauer.

  42. I'll just leave this Second Life nugget by Electrawn · · Score: 1

    Cove Story for Realtor Magazine, 2007

    http://realtormag.realtor.org/...

  43. What a wasteland. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the last person out of second life forget to pull out the plug?

  44. Bullies attract bullies, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 0

    loud-mouths attract loud-mouths, and knuckle-draggers attract knuckle-draggers. Combine all three, and you have the shitfest that is Tronald Dump's campaign.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:Bullies attract bullies, by __aaneik5497 · · Score: 1

      That's racist, homophobic, sexist, islamophobic (lowercase intentional) and something negative about trannnies. How dare you sir!

  45. Meh by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Anybody who still thinks Second Life matters, really, really, REALLY needs to get a first life!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, amateur stand up comedian from 2004!

  46. SecondLife never stopped being a thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What stopped, very dramatically, was the blogging and reblogging and general hyping up of SecondLife. That shrank to zero.

    But SecondLife itself continued doing what it always did, which is to provide a VR world outside of gaming. (Lots of folks experimented with games in SecondLife too, but it never really succeeded because the implementation was just too laggy and the controls too clunky.)

    It's still there, and with VR coming around again, the bloggers might start doing their thing once more. But SecondLife doesn't really need them. It lives in its own reality, and its users like what it gives them, including a lot of academics using it for immersive simulations.

  47. Dont Feed Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SRSLY? Trolls love seeing reactions, or seeing something about themselves.

    Trolling, beyond joking around with friends, is all about being a dick. Sadly, there are more dicks around the world than a strict male/female population count would indicate.

  48. Actually, that's not a pro-Nazi salute. by bretts · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Actually, that's not a pro-Nazi salute. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      That's really funny. Here's an excerpt from that article:

      “They said Trump is a second Hitler,” Peterson said. “I said, 'Do you know what that sign stands for? Do you know who Hitler really was?'”

      “I make the point that they are demonstrating something they had no knowledge about,” she said. “If you want to do it right, you do it right. You don’t know what you are doing.”

      Peterson claims to have saluted in counterprotest.

      “Absolutely I’m not a Nazi, no,” she told The New York Times. “I’m not one of those.”

      She threw up a Nazi salute "in counterprotest". Uh-huh. That's an interesting way to "counterprotest".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  49. Suspect by __aaneik5497 · · Score: 1

    Who stands to gain from such an action? I think Hillary Clinton is the only real answer. She's already gearing up for Trump and I'm sure this isn't the last time that you'll see acts like this being committed by bands of her more extreme followers. It's only a matter of time before some rogue Trump group pulls the same and spray paints Dalek images everywhere to remind us of Hillary's terrifying way of interacting with humans.

    1. Re:Suspect by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Clinton is so far ahead she could only be hurt by turning Sanders into a martyr. Face it...it's Trump's mouth-breathing imbeciles going after a target that can't fight back.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    2. Re:Suspect by __aaneik5497 · · Score: 1

      Interesting analysis. Perhaps you should apply for an analyst position on CNN.

  50. An article by Shaun King? by bretts · · Score: 1

    Is he black, or white, now?

    1. Re:An article by Shaun King? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The Fortune Magazine article is by Ben Kharakh and Dan Primack. Or do you only believe what you read on Breitbart?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re: An article by Shaun King? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only believe what I read in the New York Daily News.

      *ahem*

  51. Pardons by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    As Ford so often consoled himself, accepting a pardon is an admission of guilt. I wouldn't be sure that, if offered, a pardon would be accepted. If it were offered and accepted, I am quite sure that the Republicans would be delighted to hang her in the court of public opinion for being guilty of a felony, pardon or no. Which is not to say that she would not deserve that; I don't think there are many Americans who would for a moment accept electing a known criminal to the Presidency, but her political opponents are ready to seize upon the breath of an indictment, and a pardon would be playing into their hands.

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  52. "False Flag" means something else here by bretts · · Score: 2

    No Trump supporter would associate Trumps campaign with a swastika. That would hurt Trump's campaign. The same goes for anyone attempting a false flag attack.

    In a political context, "false flag" is different from its normal meaning of recruiting unwitting double agents; it means slandering your opposition by associating them with something disagreeable. As a result, a false flag attack on Trump would be people waving swastikas at his rallies, and a similar attack on Bernie would be people waving Soviet flags or something.

  53. I don't think that swastika flag is pro-Trump by AC-x · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I don't think that Swastika Trump logo flag is pro-Trump, looks more like 4chan messing around. No doubt next it'll be invaded by flying penises and afroguys chanting "Pool's closed due to AIDS".

    1. Re:I don't think that swastika flag is pro-Trump by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      They were invaded by penises when Trump's supporters arrived. Whether or not some of them were pilots, I really couldn't say.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  54. Utterly meaningless. by hey! · · Score: 0

    It might be some Trump supporter, or it could just be a chaosmonger. Some people will do shit like that because they like to see people get riled up over something they've done.

    There's been dirty tricks by "Clinton supporters" against Sanders social media. Likewise utterly meaningless. The truth is that except on-line there's not a lot of difference between Sanders and Clinton supporters, except Sanders supporters tend to be younger. Could be an oddball Clinton supporter, must just as likely it's just a plain oddball.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Utterly meaningless. by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      But most likely, by far, is that it actually is Trump supporters. In fact, we can pretty much take it as a certainty.

      Only in Perry Mason is the guy standing over the corpse with a smoking gun in his hand an innocent victim of cruel circumstance.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  55. Re:Most of swastikas are false flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to Metapedia, Jews started WWII. Check the article on NSDAP. No citation, no explanation, but Jews did it. Learn something new every day...

  56. I really hope.. by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

    ..this never ends up as one of those many cases of life imitating art.

  57. To those protesting Trump's innocence... by hyades1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is there any doubt at all in the minds of sane people that 100% of White Supremacists and neo-Nazis who actually intend to vote in the coming US federal election will cast their vote for a Republican?

    This certainly shortens the list of suspects in this situation.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  58. I think I have a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some Sanders supporters desperately need to turn off their computers and go outside for some fresh air.

    No. No, there's no charge for this bit of advice. It's completely free. No need to thank me. And you're welcome.

    1. Re: I think I have a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump supporters.

      FTFY.

      What is up with all this pro trump rhetoric? Jesus Christ slashdot.

  59. VR? by TheSync · · Score: 1

    When is Second Life going to work in Oculus Rift????

    1. Re:VR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already does.

      Has done for about a year or so - since the DK1 in fact

  60. Slashdot Connection by stinkyj · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking the other day, it's been a while since /. had a Second Life story. Back in the day they had something every day it seemed like. I'm not sure if they were getting paid or it was click fodder.

  61. This is Second Life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they had been trolled by flying dildoes, they'd have written it off as a normal troll attack.

  62. I think that happened in real life too. by apcullen · · Score: 1

    Metaphorically at least.

  63. The New York Daily News by bretts · · Score: 1

    ...the New York Daily News article is by Shaun King, and that is what I was referring to: http://www.nydailynews.com/new...

    1. Re:The New York Daily News by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      ...the New York Daily News article is by Shaun King, and that is what I was referring to:

      Nothing to say about the Fortune article?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  64. That's a deflection by bretts · · Score: 1

    Was it or was it not a pro-Nazi gesture?

    1. Re:That's a deflection by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Was it or was it not a pro-Nazi gesture?

      Was it or was it not a Nazi salute?

      Look, I understand you're trying to shill for Trump here, but there's a reason Trump is so popular over at Stormfront and the Daily Stormer. There's a reason why David Duke supports him.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  65. Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so virtually offended. I need a virtual safe space.

  66. Simpler explanation: GOP has jumped the shark. by Brannon · · Score: 2

    Trump is not some aberration, he's the next logical step in the evolution of the current GOP coalition.

  67. Re: Why the fuck is /. wasting our time with this? by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

    Yeah the Trump swastikas suggest that its probably the patriotic nigras /b/tards.

    Unless its genuine, in which case, uh, get your shit together America.

    But its almost certainly just adolecents having fun trolling the true believers.

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  68. Clinton supporters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does ANYBODY honestly believe that a bunch of Trump supporters even know what second life IS???? His base is middle-aged and older blue collar workers.

    Additionally, Trump supporters would never associate his name with swastikas, first because most are patriotic Americans drawn to his "Make America Great Again" stuff (many are US veterans), and second because the swastika is one of the most vile symbols on the planet. Even if you assume there were some extreme racist freaks among his supporters they''d want to keep the public from knowing it, not be boldly waving it about on the internet where the press and his enemies could use it to attack him.

    There ARE however some tech-savvy second-life-aware people who brag about how well they use all aspect of the internet and who get a triple benefit from this activity while losing nothing: Hillary supporters.

    1. It makes Trump supporters look like NAZI monsters

    2. It trolls and harrasses Bernie supporters

    3. It makes Bernie supporters hate Trump, who will be the only viable anti-DC corruption candidate in the fall, so they are more likely to help Hillary against Trump

  69. Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone's still using Second Life?

    I think they need to get a First Life.....

  70. People support candidates who partially agree by bretts · · Score: 1

    there's a reason Trump is so popular over at Stormfront and the Daily Stormer. There's a reason why David Duke supports him.

    It's the same reason that those people supported Mitt Romney after his 47% statement: issue overlap. When a candidate promises something that a special interest group is also concerned in, they may support that candidate even if the rest of his platform clashes with theirs. By the same token, a lot of Stormfront got excited about Helen Thomas.

  71. I don't trust the methodology. by bretts · · Score: 1

    First, it's important to mention that you still have not shown that the lady giving the Nazi salute was not doing so ironically, as she claims she was. Second, let's look at that Fortune article. Most of it is based on the use of a hashtag, #whitegenocide, which is not exclusive to white nationalists and neo-Nazis. He retweeted two of their tweets and many of them follow him. However, this is bad logic. Many of them follow a number of people who write on topics of interest, including Jonathan Haidt, Stephen Pinker and Nicholas Taleb. Further, Trump has retweeted a number of people on the outer right, probably because these were already trending among a mixed audience of right-wingers and others. So, I'm sorry I read the Fortune article; it was devoid of information of relevance.

    1. Re:I don't trust the methodology. by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      First, it's important to mention that you still have not shown that the lady giving the Nazi salute was not doing so ironically, as she claims she was.

      "giving the Nazi salute ironically".

      That's really funny.

      a hashtag, #whitegenocide, which is not exclusive to white nationalists and neo-Nazis.

      Find me someone who's using "whitegenocide" that's not an "ethno-nationalist" (aka Nazi).

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  72. Wild by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

    This election season, man... It's a wild ride. It'd be funnier if it wasn't actually really important.

    --
    Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  73. Second Life is Still Around? by slavdude · · Score: 1

    Who knew?

  74. I'm confused by neminem · · Score: 1

    How exactly does a swastika support Trump? A swastika is an image, it doesn't have a brain or anything, so isn't capable of making decisions or supporting campaigns.

  75. We're still waiting on the smoking gun by bretts · · Score: 1

    Was the woman at the Trump rally giving a Nazi salute in a pro-Nazi context? She says no, you duck the question. That's really all we need to know here.

    1. Re:We're still waiting on the smoking gun by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Was the woman at the Trump rally giving a Nazi salute in a pro-Nazi context?

      Yes. Absolutely. She supports Trump, so what other context could there be? She got caught and made famous, so she tried to backtrack. Next time, keep your mom away from Trump rallies.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  76. I don't believe it. by wyHunter · · Score: 2

    I don't believe these are Trump supporters. They're probably Bernie supporters, or Hilary supporters.

  77. Improving the ACA by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

    He got access in his first two years, and then had no chance of improving the ACA for six. A Democratic president with at Democratic congress could actually change it in a meaningful way.

    Reid and Pelosi got exactly the bill they wanted, with no Republican input whatsoever (they shut the GOP -- also anyone actually in the health care field -- out of the process entirely) and without a single Republican vote.

    They may not have intended these results. But if not, that's a matter of incompetence. They are the inevitable results of what they rammed through.

    1. Re:Improving the ACA by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      It appeared to me that Obama was trying to get the Republicans involved, and they refused. Once they got control of at least one house of Congress, their continued intransigence was predictable.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  78. Doesn't make sense by bretts · · Score: 1

    A real Nazi would keep it quiet, then seize power.