I use Uber several times a month. I love the service, and I believe that some of the improvements in Uber over Taxis are due to technology and innovation rather than just taking advantage of employees. Especially in smaller cities like mine, where critical mass for traditional taxi service is not there, but being able to track and summon Ubers works pretty well.
That being said, I have noticed that drivers are getting less happy. One problem I see is that people underestimate the wear and tear on their car. This is a real expense - more frequent oil changes, tires, etc.
The other problem is I've noticed less surge pricing. Uber has recruited drivers so aggressively they have effectively gotten the price down. If you think about it, Uber's model is great, because they raise the price until someone picks you up. This ensures you get a ride home. However, their base prices are probably unrealistically low, so if they can flood the market with drivers, they are basically getting them cheap.
Now they will churn through drivers doing this, but I wonder if Uber thinks there are enough drivers out there to churn through to tide them over until they have fully self-driving cars?
In such a wold of automation, you need to wonder about basic income.
Many computer programs are written for businesses by employees of the business. In this context the programs express the business' philosophy on doing business. The reason businesses hire their own programmers instead of always buying packaged software is because they believe their way is better than that of their competitors. They believe that by writing their own software they can codify their process in such a way that they are repeatable.
Slashdot Mirror
Kind of reminds me of when Netflix killed Blockbuster. No one shed a tear for Blockbuster.
Thank you!
Great point! ISPs are basically utilities, so are fair game for a net neutrality requirement.
I use Uber several times a month. I love the service, and I believe that some of the improvements in Uber over Taxis are due to technology and innovation rather than just taking advantage of employees. Especially in smaller cities like mine, where critical mass for traditional taxi service is not there, but being able to track and summon Ubers works pretty well.
That being said, I have noticed that drivers are getting less happy. One problem I see is that people underestimate the wear and tear on their car. This is a real expense - more frequent oil changes, tires, etc.
The other problem is I've noticed less surge pricing. Uber has recruited drivers so aggressively they have effectively gotten the price down. If you think about it, Uber's model is great, because they raise the price until someone picks you up. This ensures you get a ride home. However, their base prices are probably unrealistically low, so if they can flood the market with drivers, they are basically getting them cheap.
Now they will churn through drivers doing this, but I wonder if Uber thinks there are enough drivers out there to churn through to tide them over until they have fully self-driving cars?
In such a wold of automation, you need to wonder about basic income.
Aren't we already transporing the radioactive fuel TO the various nuclear power plants?
Many computer programs are written for businesses by employees of the business. In this context the programs express the business' philosophy on doing business. The reason businesses hire their own programmers instead of always buying packaged software is because they believe their way is better than that of their competitors. They believe that by writing their own software they can codify their process in such a way that they are repeatable.