Model S can do about 300 Wh per mile. A 80 kg battery, at 3.3 Wh/gram, can deliver 264 kWh, so about 880 miles total. But the problem is that this battery can only deliver this power gradually over 100+ years, so you would have to drive very slowly.
It's a minor operation, but the foreign materials such as the leads, make for good hiding places for bacteria. The old scar tissue surrounding them also hinders the immune system from getting good access.
Indeed. Also, the AI is extra handicapped because it's only given static 2D images. A child may be playing in the bathtub with a plastic boat, which exposes it to a huge amount of additional data about form and function.
If we could train an AI to do something similar, I'm sure it would result in much improved image recognition.
I'd rather have a nuclear battery in a pacemaker that lasts a lifetime than having to deal with surgery every 10 years to replace a conventional one, risking infection and other complications.
The question was if that code is part of their Linux kernel, or if it's part of their application software that runs on top of it ? The GPL requirements only apply to modifications of existing kernel code, not user level applications.
It will still be constrained by price of energy. Mining is a very energy intensive business, especially when you get to lower grade ores and are forced to use a clean process.
Alternatively, move one of the keys 25 pixels to the left or right. The human players will probably complete the level just the same and maybe not even notice. The AI will probably jump where the key used to be
Not necessarily. By studying the human games, it doesn't just memorize the exact screens and movements. It can also extract patterns that can be used somewhere else, like the image of a key.
It's not really a step back, but rather a more difficult problem. The reason that AlphaZero worked, is because the consequences of a mistake are quickly visible, leading to a short feedback cycle of improvements.
With these particular games, there are too many choices, and too much delay between making a choice and the consequence, making it very hard to detect patterns between a specific action and the outcome.
But training AI to win at Atari games is one story that just doesn't mean much to me.
I figure there was a reason they couldn't train an AI to beat these games a few years ago. Must be harder than you'd assume. And if they can beat them now, that's a step of progress.
That's the _whole_ point of intelligence --- to make an intelligent decision!
The problem is that intelligence operates on previously recognized patterns. A human playing the game already knows the concept of a map, and a pyramid, and understands locked doors that can be opened with a key. The AI starts with absolutely zero knowledge.
I take it to mean that the loss that the Great Barrier Reef is currently experiencing is not as great a threat (at the present moment) as some portray it.
We don't know that. Just because it has suffered before, and recovered, doesn't say much about current threat. It could be worse this time.
That is, the best solution can be found and applied instead of a stop-gap or knee-jerk remedy.
We already know the best solution, but we don't want to apply it.
Slashdot Mirror
If Git hub doesn’t bring in the money a company like Microsoft will just kill it
If it doesn't bring money, it's doomed anyway. Nobody's going to run servers for charity.
If you require trust, you shouldn't have used GitHub in the first place.
Model S can do about 300 Wh per mile. A 80 kg battery, at 3.3 Wh/gram, can deliver 264 kWh, so about 880 miles total. But the problem is that this battery can only deliver this power gradually over 100+ years, so you would have to drive very slowly.
But after 25 years it'll only produce 70.7% of the output, which may not be enough
That's better than most conventional batteries after 25 years.
It's a minor operation, but the foreign materials such as the leads, make for good hiding places for bacteria. The old scar tissue surrounding them also hinders the immune system from getting good access.
Indeed. Also, the AI is extra handicapped because it's only given static 2D images. A child may be playing in the bathtub with a plastic boat, which exposes it to a huge amount of additional data about form and function.
If we could train an AI to do something similar, I'm sure it would result in much improved image recognition.
I'd rather have a nuclear battery in a pacemaker that lasts a lifetime than having to deal with surgery every 10 years to replace a conventional one, risking infection and other complications.
Anybody who puts a private repo on somebody else's server should always assume someone's stealing their code.
They certainly wouldn't use one of these toys while drunk at a bush party
Before or after they make a campfire, light a BBQ, and toss away their burning cigarettes ?
Real flamethrowers shoot flaming liquid. This things just burns propane through a nozzle.
After Musk said he would be selling a flamethrower dubbed "Not a Flamethrower" to get around customs
And also for the simple fact that it's not a flamethrower. It's a blowtorch in the shape of a squirt gun.
Yes, I'm aware of the issue.
The question was if that code is part of their Linux kernel, or if it's part of their application software that runs on top of it ? The GPL requirements only apply to modifications of existing kernel code, not user level applications.
Why ? Do you think that's in the kernel ?
double your price of whatever you make it for
Unless you can sell it for more, then ask whatever you can get.
Suddenly EVERYTHING is cheap. Rediculously cheap
It will still be constrained by price of energy. Mining is a very energy intensive business, especially when you get to lower grade ores and are forced to use a clean process.
Alternatively, move one of the keys 25 pixels to the left or right. The human players will probably complete the level just the same and maybe not even notice. The AI will probably jump where the key used to be
Not necessarily. By studying the human games, it doesn't just memorize the exact screens and movements. It can also extract patterns that can be used somewhere else, like the image of a key.
It's not really a step back, but rather a more difficult problem. The reason that AlphaZero worked, is because the consequences of a mistake are quickly visible, leading to a short feedback cycle of improvements.
With these particular games, there are too many choices, and too much delay between making a choice and the consequence, making it very hard to detect patterns between a specific action and the outcome.
But training AI to win at Atari games is one story that just doesn't mean much to me.
I figure there was a reason they couldn't train an AI to beat these games a few years ago. Must be harder than you'd assume. And if they can beat them now, that's a step of progress.
It's almost like a toddler trying to mash different shaped objects in various holes, until it figures out that the cylinder goes in the circle.
Sufficiently advanced smoke and mirrors is indistinguishable from intelligence.
That's the _whole_ point of intelligence --- to make an intelligent decision!
The problem is that intelligence operates on previously recognized patterns. A human playing the game already knows the concept of a map, and a pyramid, and understands locked doors that can be opened with a key. The AI starts with absolutely zero knowledge.
The best part about guidelines is that you can always remove them when they get in your way.
Mammoths turned into elephants. Dinosaurs turned into birds. Etc.
That's not how evolution works.
I take it to mean that the loss that the Great Barrier Reef is currently experiencing is not as great a threat (at the present moment) as some portray it.
We don't know that. Just because it has suffered before, and recovered, doesn't say much about current threat. It could be worse this time.
That is, the best solution can be found and applied instead of a stop-gap or knee-jerk remedy.
We already know the best solution, but we don't want to apply it.
Actually, we just need someone to tell these diabetics to stop eating/drinking sugar and grains.
Plus it provides future fuel flexibility.