Here is lots of new blue goo now. New goo. Blue goo. Gooey. Gooey. Blue goo. New goo. Gluey. Gluey.
Gooey goo for chewy chewing! That's what that Goo-Goose is doing. Do you choose to chew goo, too, sir? If, sir, you, sir, choose to chew, sir, with the Goo-Goose, chew, sir. Do, sir.
It doesn't really matter if you can see the ass-end of your vehicle as a point of reference. If there is nothing your mirrors or your view, there is nothing beside your car. If there is something in your mirror it doesn't matter where it is in reference to your car, your mirror is adjusted so that if you see it, it is next to you so don't change lanes.
I vote for that counting as a bug. However, now that I know about it I hope it is never fixed as a bug. Thanks for the tip.
Re:It's the all encompassing .com that's the probl
on
Utube Sues YouTube
·
· Score: 0
This is effectively like addming more top-level domains, though not as easy to use as a TLD. And that won't really make any difference because companies will buy up all the domains they can to protect their name. So in the end, the only ones that benefit from that are the registrars. It still wouldn't matter as long as there is no one actually policing who owns domains.
One of Mozilla's primary goals is to be 100% standards compliant. It is FAR more in tune with standards than a lot of the other browsers (though I will admit that IE does support a very large deal of them). So the fact that Mozilla wouldn't render the pages correctly is pretty much crap. Oh wait...They meant MS standards...I guess I read that wrong.
I am not artistic at all. I purchased "The Official Blender 2.0 Guide" (not the "Blender Book") and was able to create some simple 3D objects.
The book has a lot of detail, and kind of a strange columned layout, and was a little hard for me to follow at times. It did make it possible for me to actually use Blender which was more than I was getting before the book. The book still doesn't cover anything about the game engine though.
Interesting though that MS happens to be the same itials of Multiple Sclerosis, a debilitating disease affecting the brain and nervous system.
Re:Uh... what's wrong with a distributed root, the
on
IETF vs. ICANN
·
· Score: 1
If the same data was distributed to multiple roots, that would be a good thing. But the problem is that companies who are starting their own roots are also adding their own TLDs (otherwise, what would be the point of having a root?)
I don't really see that it would be a problem until somenewroot.com has a.some TLD and ICANN wants to incorporate a.some TLD into the "real" roots. That is where the problem hits.
Re:In accordance with prophesy
on
Shared Source?
·
· Score: 1
Since pretty much everyone who gets email gets spammed every now and then...You can help everyone else by submitting that information to RBLs.
Realtime Blackhole Lists tell your MTA if the sender is acceptable based on a DNS-type query. The two that I know of are Mail-abuse.org's RBL and ORBS
There is some concern that things get denied accidentally...But at this point, I would rather risk losing 1 piece of mail every now and then than be bombarded with 20 spams a day.
I was thinking "ShipFlix" and "NetFlix", which also easily transitions to shitflix if you are so inclined :)
Here is lots of new blue goo now.
New goo. Blue goo.
Gooey. Gooey.
Blue goo. New goo.
Gluey. Gluey.
Gooey goo for chewy chewing!
That's what that Goo-Goose is doing.
Do you choose to chew goo, too, sir?
If, sir, you, sir, choose to chew, sir,
with the Goo-Goose, chew, sir.
Do, sir.
My favorite Dr. Seuess book.
It doesn't really matter if you can see the ass-end of your vehicle as a point of reference. If there is nothing your mirrors or your view, there is nothing beside your car. If there is something in your mirror it doesn't matter where it is in reference to your car, your mirror is adjusted so that if you see it, it is next to you so don't change lanes.
Looks a lot like Quikwriting that I had installed on my palm 10 years ago.
http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/demos/quikwriting2_1-rel-notes.html
I also put a vote in for Smoothwall. I never used the commercial version, but the "Express" version did really well and was really easy to maintain.
I vote for that counting as a bug. However, now that I know about it I hope it is never fixed as a bug. Thanks for the tip.
This is effectively like addming more top-level domains, though not as easy to use as a TLD. And that won't really make any difference because companies will buy up all the domains they can to protect their name. So in the end, the only ones that benefit from that are the registrars. It still wouldn't matter as long as there is no one actually policing who owns domains.
One of Mozilla's primary goals is to be 100% standards compliant. It is FAR more in tune with standards than a lot of the other browsers (though I will admit that IE does support a very large deal of them). So the fact that Mozilla wouldn't render the pages correctly is pretty much crap. Oh wait...They meant MS standards...I guess I read that wrong.
I am not artistic at all. I purchased "The Official Blender 2.0 Guide" (not the "Blender Book") and was able to create some simple 3D objects.
The book has a lot of detail, and kind of a strange columned layout, and was a little hard for me to follow at times. It did make it possible for me to actually use Blender which was more than I was getting before the book. The book still doesn't cover anything about the game engine though.
Interesting though that MS happens to be the same itials of Multiple Sclerosis, a debilitating disease affecting the brain and nervous system.
If the same data was distributed to multiple roots, that would be a good thing. But the problem is that companies who are starting their own roots are also adding their own TLDs (otherwise, what would be the point of having a root?)
I don't really see that it would be a problem until somenewroot.com has a .some TLD and ICANN wants to incorporate a .some TLD into the "real" roots. That is where the problem hits.
M$ has no ideas
Realtime Blackhole Lists tell your MTA if the sender is acceptable based on a DNS-type query. The two that I know of are Mail-abuse.org's RBL and ORBS
There is some concern that things get denied accidentally...But at this point, I would rather risk losing 1 piece of mail every now and then than be bombarded with 20 spams a day.