Slashdot Mirror


8pen Reinvents the Keyboard For Mobile Devices

An anonymous reader submitted linkage to a company called 8pen that has a new take on one-handed input. I've attached the video if you click the link below, but it's a strange idea using outward spreading swipes that somewhat mimics handwriting. It ships for Android tomorrow, but even if you don't want to try it out, it's an interesting idea for anyone who is tired of finger tapping on a tiny screen.

214 comments

  1. Re:Video? by Combatso · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    see the big video link, just below... that one.. also the link in the summary has a giant "PLAY VIDEO!" button

  2. Learning curve? by acnicklas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My parent's generation is still trying to figure out 3-3-3 for F, despite having an alpha-numeric keypad since the days of rotary phones. How are they supposed to learn this?

    1. Re:Learning curve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not. They are supposed to find it overcomplicated and confusing. Fortunately this leaves them with more time for more practical things, like complaining about the kinds of people who would find this app useful to get off their lawn.

    2. Re:Learning curve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually all it takes is taking the extra 10-15 minutes to make sure they have grasped the concept and a reminder the next day to have them do it again on their own.

      A little patience goes a long way.

    3. Re:Learning curve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Did the letters exist on rotary phones? I thought that came with touchtone phones. At any rate the importance of that system greatly increased in the last 10 years vs "1-800-FREE CAR" type numbers being the only use previously.

    4. Re:Learning curve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did the letters exist on rotary phones? I thought that came with touchtone phones. At any rate the importance of that system greatly increased in the last 10 years vs "1-800-FREE CAR" type numbers being the only use previously.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rotarydial.JPG

      From Wikipedia:

      Dials in other countries than Canada, the United States, and large cities in Britain (before all-figure dialing) usually did not bear alphabetic characters and an indication of the word "operator" in addition to numbers. Alphabetic designation of exchanges was also used for a short period in the Soviet Union in the 1950s, but by the next decade this practice was largely discontinued. The world-wide use of alphabetic characters on number key pads became common after the introduction of digital mobile phones, where the assignment of alphabetic characters to number keys was utilized for entering alphanumeric short messages as SMS.

      Please turn in your walker, cane and "Get Off My Lawn Sign" to the nice old codger at the Service Table. ... Alternatively, welcome to the U.S. ;)

    5. Re:Learning curve? by Wiarumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forget the parents - I'm thinking to myself, how long is it going to take ME to learn this to the point where it is competitively fast as chicken pecking a QWERTY.

      --
      I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    6. Re:Learning curve? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      How are they supposed to learn this?

      When their interest level is high enough it'll come quick enough.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Learning curve? by brainboyz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think when compared to the size of the keyboard when in vertical screen mode, it might be quick. May not be competitive with the horizontal layout for a while, but won't be hard to beat vertical.

    8. Re:Learning curve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Anything that means I don't have to try to see those tiny keys is something I would be eager to learn (from someone in the poster's parent's generation).

    9. Re:Learning curve? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0, Troll

      My parent's generation...

      Obviously it's not targeted at your parent's generation. Is it too complicated for you? Then let me say this: Yes, I'd like fries with my burger.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    10. Re:Learning curve? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I agree, my baseball bat sized fingertips are unable to use the on-screen keyboard in vertical mode.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    11. Re:Learning curve? by whawk640 · · Score: 1

      Heheh, I want to try this, but the learning curve looks harder than my keyboard though. SlydeBoard is my Android keyboard. http://whawk640.robotdrone.com/Android/index.php

    12. Re:Learning curve? by acnicklas · · Score: 1

      I may only have one parent. S/he may be the only one of his/her generation. Does qualifying my statement make it better?

    13. Re:Learning curve? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does qualifying my statement make it better?

      No, not really. Parent is still valid, and you sound like a WHINER.

  3. More keyboards by muppetman462 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All these different types of keyboards for the android devices are making my head spin. Next it will be brain waves to text! I'll stick with SwipeIT, thank you very much....

    1. Re:More keyboards by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

      All these different types of keyboards for the android devices are making my head spin. Next it will be brain waves to text! I'll stick with SwipeIT, thank you very much....

      I think that I hope my boss doesn't see me posting on slashdot brain waves wow that girl from HR walked by, look at her tits to text is the Jesus how much coffee did that moron bob put in this cup? way of the future What else should i write. Uhm ... I guess thats it

    2. Re:More keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think that I hope my boss doesn't see me posting on slashdot brain waves wow that girl from HR walked by, look at her tits to text is the Jesus how much coffee did that moron bob put in this cup? way of the future What else should i write. Uhm ... I guess thats it

      What's the deal with hot chicks working in HR anyways?

    3. Re:More keyboards by fkx · · Score: 0

      It's called entrapment.

    4. Re:More keyboards by poetmatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      while swype is nice, I think this (8pen) reflects on the fact that the original qwerty keyboard isn't necessarily the best layout in town or the worst, and that maybe it's time people start looking into full on alternatives.

      I'm not saying Dvorak, but since we can rearrange keys by choice, maybe it's time people look for something that might work better.

    5. Re:More keyboards by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Its a lot easier to hire a dork for a crappy temporary "contract-for-hire" job when he gets the pitch while sitting in a starbucks across from a perky blonde in a miniskirt.

    6. Re:More keyboards by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      maybe it's time people look for something that might work better.

      One day, I might have a stab at this problem: I write (as with a fountain-pen on paper) in a form of cursive hand with which most OCR programs have difficulty in coping, despite being regarded by others as quite attractive.

      What I would like to see implemented is a touchscreen input mechanism that will accept my finger gestures as I write "on the spot", i.e. without needing to scroll to the right. It should be possible to do, and I'm fairly sure it would be faster than any of the one-handed alternatives for mobile devices.

    7. Re:More keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can think in bold and italic? Wow!

    8. Re:More keyboards by toleraen · · Score: 1

      I'm not opposed to new input layouts, I've tried several for smartphones over the years, but this doesn't seem to be that alternative for me. The amount of gesturing required for a single letter is ridiculous, especially compared to something like swype. It may be more accurate, but looks extremely time consuming. Maybe a combination of swype and T9 (or whatever recognition (not keyboard layout) blackberries use for their Pearl style keyboards) would work better?

  4. Future steps by BRSloth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, you could add a pen to the device, so you don't have to deal with, say, something that makes it hard to swipe your finger across the screen and reduce the grease in the screen.

    Then, after that, you could make the movements more like handwritting, since people are used to that.

    Then, maybe, to help people write things faster, put split areas for letters and numbers.

    You know, I think I saw that somewhere else before....

    1. Re:Future steps by MrMarkie · · Score: 1

      ...Then, after that, you could make the movements more like handwritting, since people are used to that.

      What is this handwriting you speak of? Do you mean how you use your hands to interface with the keyboard?

      --
      /M
    2. Re:Future steps by franciscohs · · Score: 1

      The problem with hand writing is that I think people is increasingly less used to it (writing notes on a post-it doesn't count). On top of that, I never understood how having to write on a screen, with really big letters could be more effective than writing on a virtual keyboard, even if I was used to hand write.

    3. Re:Future steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I saw it, too.

      In a patent, probably... :(

    4. Re:Future steps by AdamsGuitar · · Score: 1

      You're really advocating handwriting recognition (or, God forbid, Graffiti) as a suitable replacement to the keyboard for input? Yeah, that's definitely the way to go.

    5. Re:Future steps by trooperer · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the "one handed input" bit of TFA

    6. Re:Future steps by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

      One handed? Try this, hold your phone with one hand, and try to make circular motions on the front surface using your thumb. I don't know about you, but pulling over toward my palm and then moving down (the noon-to-four motion) is pretty hard to do.

      But that's ok, all I need is some exercise: Push! Harder! Go faster Max! Reach over the top. Master your ass!

    7. Re:Future steps by shadowrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Graffiti was great. I still think it was the best input system for screen based devices. Once you learned it, i think speed an accuracy were far superior to todays soft keyboards and natural handwriting recognition. The palms also had this fun game to help you learn it. After a couple days of playing that game where letters fell down the screen, i was a pro.

      I was going to post about how graffiti was the best ever and 8pen probably sucks, but after watching the video, i think i'm kind of intrigued by it. It actually looks like it would work well and, much like graffiti, is based around a set of unambiguous gestures with well defined start and end points.

      It also looks like it's engineered to work well with a touch screen. Yeah, i appreciate the accuracy of a stylus for drawing, but really, why require a little stick that gets lost or broken easily when you can come up with a perfectly efficient means of data entry that utilizes just the device and the user?

      I'm actually a little bummed that i won't see it on my iphone anytime soon.

    8. Re:Future steps by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's not so much "handwriting" - more like graffiti.

    9. Re:Future steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Master your ass!

      Well then.

    10. Re:Future steps by Asmor · · Score: 1

      Graffiti is exactly what he's describing, in what I thought was a fairly obvious tongue-in-cheek manner.

    11. Re:Future steps by dreemernj · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's just that I am used to Blackberry track balls and touch pads, but the motion you describe seems incredibly easy to do. It seems like a natural progression of what people often already do on their cell phones and not something that will actually be a challenge unless you have a phone that is really big compared to your hand or perhaps a medical condition with your hand.

      --
      1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
    12. Re:Future steps by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      What is this handwriting you speak of? Do you mean how you use your hands to interface with the keyboard?

      It's when you use your mailing label printer to spray a note on your hand so you can remember your task list until your cellphone battery recharges.

    13. Re:Future steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One handed? Try this, hold your phone with one hand, and try to make circular motions on the front surface using your thumb.

      Use your nose. Pics or it didn't happen.

    14. Re:Future steps by austinpoet · · Score: 1

      who does #2 work for!

    15. Re:Future steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Handwriting is terrible. HW speed in WPM is slower than swype. HW has developed for "dumb paper (clay/papyrus/cave walls)" technology, NOT digital smartphones with feedback. The kind of gestures touchscreen can distinguish and paper are very different. Note that you can't write snailmail (paper+ink variety) by 8pen-method, for example. Nice try, come again.

  5. Interesting by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reminds me a bit of Swype though watching the video, it seems like it would be slower than Swype.

    I'll probably try it out though. My anticipation is that I would need to learn the positions of all the letters to know how many sectors to cover for each. Counting them on the fly would really slow it down. And then there would be those words I'd hate because they involved lots of swirls. Like how we hated people with 9s in their phone numbers during the days of rotary phones.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Interesting by Asm-Coder · · Score: 1

      I don't know. I'd eventually develop motor memory for typing if I used this frequently enough, so memorization may not be required.

      Also, just looking at the Swype, I'm not conviced that 8pen would be slower, (actually, it seems like 8pen would be faster to me) but 8pen also seems like it would be less error prone.

      I'd try it out, but I don't have an android unfortunately, partly because I've never found one with a decent keyboard. (The slide-out ones are the closest to decent I've found) I'll have to try it out on someone else's phone, and maybe this will finally bring me to the smart-phone market.

    2. Re:Interesting by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try out the Epic 4g, I got one recently and the keyboard is great. Not perfect, some keys could be rearranged and god knows why they put a smiley key instead of a .com key, but it's good otherwise.

    3. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Swype and it's common to be able to write a full word with a single straight line or quick squiggle. 8pen, by design, involves a lot more movement. Its claims of being more accurate is likely true (since you have to input every letter, Swype has an opportunity to misunderstand, especially since it deals with sloppy input) and Swype can't be used without looking at the screen, but 8pen being faster or easier? I really doubt it.

    4. Re:Interesting by ozgood · · Score: 2, Informative

      For anybody that hasn't tried swype, give it a shot. Very quick input. The tutorial takes 2 minutes and you'll be an expert in half a day. I love it.

    5. Re:Interesting by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      Swype is crazy fast. I'll show it to friends and it really messes with their heads the amount I can type with what seems to be very little movement on my part. This is especially true with words that have multiple occurrences of repeated letter. They use Missippi in the demo video for good reason.

      It's like moving from hunt-and-peck to touch typing. TFA says 8pen is like writing by hand, which is why I think it would be slower than something that is very much like typing.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    6. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My biggest problem with swype is that while I am swiping around long words my finger inevitably looses the contact the screen requires for a continuous gesture. This product makes that problem seem like it would be a massive headache.

    7. Re:Interesting by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      I like my epic as well, the keyboard would have been a little better if the key tops were not perfectly flat and smooth. A little roundness and texture would make typing just a tad easier.

    8. Re:Interesting by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Swype is awesome, I'm faster with one finger in portrait mode than I ever was with two in landscape mode.

      All I gotta say.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    9. Re:Interesting by Asmor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The issue with swype is that, no matter how good you get at it, you still have to pay attention to the screen.

      With this, you could type without looking at the screen, finally allowing smartphone owners to text and drive as efficiently as the luddites with their old-school keypads. ;)

    10. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrmm...I didn't think of that. You really wouldn't have to look, especially if you had a little haptic feedback (vibration when you go over each divider, etc). Maybe you could speed it up by splitting the screen into more sections. Bah...I say we just use Morse code input. :P

    11. Re:Interesting by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      Anybody know if Swype is only for Nokia phones?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    12. Re:Interesting by Threni · · Score: 1

      You need a phone with a capacitive screen then...

    13. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not. Swype is its own company and licenses the technology for several phones (including Android and WinMo 6.5 phones).

    14. Re:Interesting by NoseyNick · · Score: 1

      You're honestly kidding yourself. I don't pretend to be a particularly amazing typist, but I can still trivially beat the Swype "world record" on my BlackBerry keyboard. Swype is not crazy fast, it's just quite a lot faster than typing on glass.

      --
      Nick Waterman, Sr Tech Director, #include <stddisclaimer>
    15. Re:Interesting by tjhart85 · · Score: 1

      Then how about you put your money where your mouth is?

      The current world record for fastest texting was accomplished using Swype.

      If you can do it so much better, DO IT and get that title taken away from swype. Until then, it's the fastest because its been proven to be. NoseyNick saying "I'm faster!11!!!1!!" wasn't the only requirement.

    16. Re:Interesting by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      Swype still requires fairly accurate start, end and transition points as well as the device must predict. This requires no prediction, therefore no input lag, and you should be able to do it without even looking at the screen after you associate the muscle movements to memory. Also, it wont be confused by names and unknown words, like all other prediction based methods are.

      I see the use, and after only a few text messages playing with it I already find myself swirling a few letters without having to consciously plan my choice. I figure a couple weeks with it and it will far exceed my wpm and will negate two handed landscape mode for longer messages.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    17. Re:Interesting by NoseyNick · · Score: 1
      I don't need to. You need to read the small-print, then you need to stop drinking the kool-aid. It's not the "fastest texting", it's the Guinness World Record for the fastest text message on a touchscreen phone.

      I equalled the Swype record on my first try on my BlackBerry Bold despite the tricky latin words in the message you're supposed to type. By my 3rd or 4th try I was beating it by a huge margin... And again, I'm not going to pretend to be a particularly amazing typist, I'm just an average BlackBerry typist.

      --
      Nick Waterman, Sr Tech Director, #include <stddisclaimer>
  6. add it to the bin of failed input methods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    seems pretty neat but so did the rest at the time

    T9 (how many years development? and still everyone turns it off)
    Swype
    Gestures
    Dasher

    etc etc
    and still blackberries et al still have a qwerty input method
    somebody needs to update the famous slashdot spam template "your post advocates..." but for input methods

    1. Re:add it to the bin of failed input methods by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      I completely agree here. I look at all of these "new methods", and yet we are stuck with the QWERTY. A typing arrangement that was meant to be slow. I think the core part of this problem is that we are used to this keyboard. And no matter how hard this keyboard is I am guessing it is completely hard wired into our brain to the point where we are pretty good at it. Not like that is a first oops moment in the evolution sequence.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    2. Re:add it to the bin of failed input methods by vlm · · Score: 1

      Palm OS Graffiti input. Enjoyed it for many years.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graffiti_(Palm_OS)

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:add it to the bin of failed input methods by e4g4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      QWERTY. A typing arrangement that was meant to be slow.

      That is a common misconception. The QWERTY arrangement was designed to put common "chords" at opposite sides of the keyboard, so that the hammers on a typewriter wouldn't catch on each other and jam. So while, theoretically, QWERTY is _slightly_ slower than other layouts, the reality is that the speed difference is never more than a couple wpm. The layout was designed because people were too fast for the hardware of the time, but it did not solve the problem by slowing typists down; rather it accommodated their speed.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    4. Re:add it to the bin of failed input methods by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      Actually, I used T9 almost exclusively until I got a smartphone. Once you get a hang of which common words show up in which order when you click "next word" you can pretty much touch type except for unique words.

    5. Re:add it to the bin of failed input methods by daid303 · · Score: 1

      I use T9, it's not perfect, but beats the hell out of the other option (whatever it's called). But then again, I only write short SMS messages (yes, SMS = Short Message Service, so kill me) if you are writing a book or letters, use something better then your damn phone.

    6. Re:add it to the bin of failed input methods by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used Swype? I absolutely loved it from the first moment I tried it. It was instantly faster than two-thumb typing, and the more I use it the faster I get with it.

      Ditto for T9 on a clamshell phone vs multi-button mashing (222-55-6-333-etc).

      I've never used Gestures or Dasher, so I can't say for them.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    7. Re:add it to the bin of failed input methods by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the technicality trivia.

      Not only is QWERTY slower than modern layouts. It is also physically awkward. A lot of words are typed using only the left or right hand, preventing an even use of left-right hand. This, in addition to the "gymnastics" we have to do to type some words increase hand strain.

      I have been typing in QWERTY all my life. And although I have tried going to DVORAK I have never mastered it (it is very difficult to unlearn); nevertheless every time I take a couple of hours for writing in DVORAK I really enjoy the left-right hand alternation feeling.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    8. Re:add it to the bin of failed input methods by whawk640 · · Score: 1

      You're right of course. We all know qwerty. For anything else to catch on, you have to find a way to convince a million people to switch. So, here's my touch-type QWERTY keyboard for android. (Try it with both thumbs.): SlydeBoard: http://whawk640.robotdrone.com/Android/index.php

    9. Re:add it to the bin of failed input methods by e4g4 · · Score: 1

      I have read that because one's fingers travel a physically greater distance on QWERTY than on Dvorak, QWERTY causes more strain on the user than Dvorak does, though I've never really experienced any strain from typing on a keyboard that was not solved by keeping my elbows at a good height (but then, I'm in my late twenties, perhaps with 10 more years of QWERTY I will change my tune). The stats I've seen on master QWERTY typists vs Dvorak typists showed that the actual wpm advantages are very minimal (2-3 wpm). I've also tried Dvorak a couple of times, but couldn't really take the hit to productivity caused by the amount of time it would take me to unlearn QWERTY and get to decent speeds on Dvorak.

      --
      The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
  7. Useless by eln · · Score: 3, Informative

    Those of us who have been on the Internet since puberty have already mastered the art of one-handed input with a standard keyboard and mouse. With the proper motivation we can easily adapt this skill to a regular on-screen keyboard.

    1. Re:Useless by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Those of us who have been on the Internet since puberty have already mastered the art of one-handed input with a standard keyboard and mouse. With the proper motivation we can easily adapt this skill to a regular on-screen keyboard.

      Ha! One hand Dvorak should be part of the curriculum of Comp101

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Useless by 517714 · · Score: 1

      Those of us who have been on the Internet since puberty have already mastered the art of one-handed input with a standard keyboard and mouse. With the proper motivation we can easily adapt this skill to a regular on-screen keyboard.

      Mobile devices by their very nature tend to be used in public areas. Your "motivation" is unlikely to be considered acceptable behavior.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  8. Re:An Anonymous Reader Submitted This?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Really? And it ships for android tomorrow? Fascinating. Almost a coincidence.

    I hope he wasn't too anonymous, and that Slashdot is able to cash the check he sent along with his submission...

    Calm down, I'm sure it was just a random Slashdotter submitting an innocent link.

  9. Not a great implementation by drumcat · · Score: 1

    The process assumes that a keyboard is less handy than a touch-rotate-touch-release. In short, this is doomed to fail because I must memorize things. It's probably easier for us to all learn Morse, and just have a deet da dee deet festival.

    1. Re:Not a great implementation by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      The process assumes that a keyboard is less handy than a touch-rotate-touch-release. In short, this is doomed to fail because I must memorize things. It's probably easier for us to all learn Morse, and just have a deet da dee deet festival.

      Nah, I think its more along the lines of a Carlos Mencia "Deet de Dee"

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    2. Re:Not a great implementation by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      But (full-sized) keyboards are only fast once you've memorized the layout and don't have to hunt down specific keys...
      until you reach that point, you're down to hunting letters every time, with either system.

    3. Re:Not a great implementation by drumcat · · Score: 1

      Awesome - you got the reference! :)

    4. Re:Not a great implementation by ma3382 · · Score: 1

      It's probably easier for us to all learn Morse, and just have a deet da dee deet festival.

      I fail to see your logic. You had to memorize a QWERTY keyboard layout and you would have to memorize Morse. You have to learn/memorize something for these inputs. Take Swype [swypeinc.com], you have to have the keyboard layout memorized, on top of memorizing what gestures do what. Or even Voice inputs...you have to have a language memorized/learned to be able to speak it.

    5. Re:Not a great implementation by drumcat · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I have 10 fingers to do that with. Sometimes 26 letters each need a "button", touch or otherwise. There will be no "intermediate" input layout. We will go from qwerty to voice. All the rest is just .wma

    6. Re:Not a great implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We will go from qwerty to voice.

      Hell if I'm going to be composing my text messages by voice in public; at that point, I would just.... you know... give the person a fucking call.

    7. Re:Not a great implementation by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you have to memorize anything? In the video they have a very cool animation where the letters are magnified as the finger moves. Presumably the same kind of interface could be (or has been) developed to aid in memorizing the gestures. I absolutely cannot stand virtual touch keyboards on mobile devices--this on the other hand would actually make me consider a touch-screen device. (I currently have a e71x with a tiny little physical qwerty keyboard that I can almost tolerate.)

    8. Re:Not a great implementation by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      t's probably easier for us to all learn Morse, and just have a deet da dee deet festival.

      An L festival?

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    9. Re:Not a great implementation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with that is that a phone call requires both parties to be available at the exact same time, for the same length of time minimum.

      That's the beauty of a text message. If I'm busy and a text comes in, I can ignore it until I have free time, then proceed to check and respond to it. And the other person can do the same with my response.

    10. Re:Not a great implementation by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "In short, this is doomed to fail because I must memorize things. "

      I agree. It is common knowledge that we are all born with an innate understanding of the location of the keys on a QWERTY keyboard. If we had to memorize things it would have never taken off!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    11. Re:Not a great implementation by Fumus · · Score: 1

      It's probably easier for us to all learn Morse, and just have a deet da dee deet festival.

      While quickly tapping with your thumb could lead to strained muscles, I think it would be the perfect solution for voice input!

      No more complex voice recognition algorithms. Just ask the user to say "dee" and "daa" so that the phone knows what's a dot and what's a line and off you go. You'd sound like a total nerd, but I'm sure it would have better accuracy than current voice recognition :P

    12. Re:Not a great implementation by drumcat · · Score: 1

      By default, yes. Even so, when you decide how things should be split up, you still have to perform three tasks per letter. DOA. tap move to region, swirl one of two directions, stop in a quadrant. That versus press? Easy call. This has no chance.

    13. Re:Not a great implementation by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "This has no chance."

      You mean it has no chance with you . You might be surprised to discover the number of people in the world who are not you.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  10. The new Dvorak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Are those letter positions optimal? The scheme feels nice, but I'm not sure if the letter positions are as good as they could be.

    1. Re:The new Dvorak by gufodotto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are those letter positions optimal? The scheme feels nice, but I'm not sure if the letter positions are as good as they could be.

      as the video says, they're optimised for their frequency in the english language and so that common words, like 'you', can be done with a figure of eight, or some easily memorised swirl...

    2. Re:The new Dvorak by hrvatska · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be cool if you could program where the characters were along the different axises. That way people could customize it for their preferences.

    3. Re:The new Dvorak by froggymana · · Score: 1

      I think that it should almost be more standardised, like it is, so that when you go to borrow someone else's phone that has that its exactly the same.

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    4. Re:The new Dvorak by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, maybe you should wait and see if they got it right before wading in there and making a mess of it ;)

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  11. Re:Video? by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Safari doesn't display anything. I see the problem. Same problem as their website.

    Note: The tag is deprecated. There's articles as far back as 2006 saying to stop using the embed tag.

  12. seems so primitive by u4ya · · Score: 1

    can't we just stick devices in our heads to read our thoughts directly?

  13. Wrong adjective. by ArAgost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    “Intuitive”? Looks like a nightmare to learn.

    1. Re:Wrong adjective. by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      Yea, it reminds me The Onion's Apple Wheel parody. Funny that it was not Apple that actually implemented it!

    2. Re:Wrong adjective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you notice how the wheel is simply a trackball for QWERTY keyboard? Different application of same input.
      Would you also fail to distinguish car's steering wheel and mac wheel?

  14. Red, Yellow, Green, Blue? What? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Is it a big coincidence, or is there someone at 8pen who's a Neo-Geo fan?

    1. Re:Red, Yellow, Green, Blue? What? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Take a look at the Android logo. Look at the Chrome logo. Look at the Simon Says logo.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Red, Yellow, Green, Blue? What? by ma3382 · · Score: 1

      They are the colors in Google's logo (and surprisingly very similar to the logo of the Nexus One). Hmmmm....coincidence?

    3. Re:Red, Yellow, Green, Blue? What? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Android logo is a green robot...

      The Chrome logo looks like Samus in morph ball mode.

      Simon says blue-blue-red-green-yellow-green-yellow-blue-red.

    4. Re:Red, Yellow, Green, Blue? What? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Simon games are red, blue, yellow, green. Not the same order.

    5. Re:Red, Yellow, Green, Blue? What? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should try it first - you know, so you don't look like an idiot so much.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  15. I am conservative by dorinmouss · · Score: 1

    I stick with my standard keyboard :))

    1. Re:I am conservative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend you stick with your native language as well.

  16. New Keyboard by DarksideDaveOR · · Score: 1

    I predict a level of success similar to that achieved by previous attempts to replace the qwerty scheme, even ones that were arguably better. At best, it will gain a small, rabid following, that will eventually end up putting off additional converts. Of course, it's far more likely it will simply slide into obscurity.

    1. Re:New Keyboard by gufodotto · · Score: 1

      I predict a level of success similar to that achieved by previous attempts to replace the qwerty scheme, even ones that were arguably better. At best, it will gain a small, rabid following, that will eventually end up putting off additional converts. Of course, it's far more likely it will simply slide into obscurity.

      did you mean 'swipe' into obscurity? :-)

    2. Re:New Keyboard by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      Fair point, but there are a couple significant differences:

      1. Typing on mobile devices is still relatively new to many people, and doing so with the QWERTY keyboard layout can be difficult. I'm a touch typist, but I do find typing on a Blackberry's hardware keyboard cumbersome enough to want an alternative. You simply can't touch type on such a small keyboard.

      2. Alternative keyboard layouts were hardware solutions. This is a software solution which, assuming it's free, people can try with no commitment, and know that they can always switch back to the "standard" method. It's kind of like if the early typewriters had an instantly changeable keyboard layouts to try. In time you might come to realize that one layout works better for you than others.

      I'm not saying this approach will succeed, just that QWERTY on mobile devices doesn't have anywhere near the strong foothold it has on full-size hardware keyboards.

  17. Fitaly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not Fitaly?

  18. Re:Video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both Safari and Firefox seem to work just fine under OSX.

    The embedded link is a YouTube video. Maybe there is something blocking the embedded code from running, or blocking YouTube where you are?

    The link to see the video on YouTube's site is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3OuCR0EpGo&feature=player_embedded

  19. Bah. by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

    One-handed input without an appropriate name? I'm sticking with my Twiddler.

    1. Re:Bah. by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      WARNING: Flashified site. Go to pricing page for still photo.
      WARNING: $200

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    2. Re:Bah. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      A bluetooth version would have been nice.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  20. Better idea: by gman003 · · Score: 0

    Instead of alphabetical order, prioritize the most commonly used characters. Right now, A, E, I, M, Q, U Y and . have the fastest, one-swipe spots. Some of those make sense (e is very common, for instance) but q? Meanwhile, S and T, both popular letters, are in poorly-optimized locations.

    C'mon, people. You can do better than this.

    1. Re:Better idea: by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the video? How can you possibly be under the impression that the ordering is alphabetical? Come on, gman003. You can do better than this.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Better idea: by confu2000 · · Score: 1

      I guess there needs to be a new Slashdot abbreviation. WTEFV.
      2:24 shows the actual layout.

    3. Re:Better idea: by maccallr · · Score: 1

      C'mon gman003. You can watch the whole video, surely, before posting?

  21. Re:An Anonymous Reader Submitted This?? by Yvan256 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The fact that it's the same broken, deprecated "embed tag" for the video in both the summary and the company website is also a mere coincidence.

  22. Did they just repackage Palm? by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    Using almost letter like gestures to type in text.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  23. Re:Video? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You either don't have Flash, or your adblocker is fucking it up.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  24. Palm recognition by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This seems like a bit of an awkward kludge - capacitive touchscreens are evidently not terribly well suited to such precise inputs.

    It's been about 10 years since I've regularly used a Palm Pilot. Handwriting recognition on those devices Worked. I could get quite consistent input, at roughly the same speed as I could writing by hand.

    To this day, my written "T" still looks like a "7" on occasion. It felt quite natural and, as far as I know, no handwriting mechanism has come close to rivaling it for effectiveness/consistency.

    Do the WebOS devices still have this capability?

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:Palm recognition by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I'd like to add that Swype sort of works like this, but you don't have to memorize the gestures since you're swiping your finger over a visible keyboard on your screen.

    2. Re:Palm recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ACCESS released an android IME for the old palm graffiti. I've used it and it might just work if i could find a damn capacitive stylus that didnt suck.

    3. Re:Palm recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they currently don't.

    4. Re:Palm recognition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is what I hoped, and checked into a Palm Pre Plus from Verizon when they were free with "New Every 2". What a disappointment to find out that there was NO on-screen text entry ability - only that annoying slide-out pill-button keyboard.

      My son does fine with one, but I, too, was spoiled by Palm's Graffiti (and by WinMobile's Letter Recognizer, which works about as well on my XV6800). My trials of a couple Android phones failed partly on that basis of inferior text input methods. Sticking with XV6800 (getting Imagio in a few days to see how it does).

      RO

    5. Re:Palm recognition by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      Even in the tiny keyboards, I always found writing by hand is extremely slower than typing. Mini-keyboards (touch or physical) for cellphones and PDA will still be the best option until someone comes up with a mental link that will recognize thought words, because let's face it, you don't want to be dictating text messages to your wife in a meeting.

    6. Re:Palm recognition by Kirys · · Score: 1

      I loved Graffiti too on my Palm m512, I Was really sad when palm lost against lexmark and removed graffiti for the same input system of symbian.
      Anyway, I've just searched and there is a graffiti port for android. But I just feel strange using the finger instead of a pen (maybe it's time to buy a capacitive pen).
      Cya

      --
      Unluckily Murphy was right.
    7. Re:Palm recognition by psyclone · · Score: 1

      But you still need to memorize _some_ of the qwerty layout, from a visual perspective. (my hands have it memorized on a normal keyboard). When Swyping, my finger or thumb blocks letters near it. I do agree that you don't have to memorize any gestures.

  25. Re:Video? by Yvan256 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I browse with Flash disabled. When someone says "there's a link to the video", it should be a link to the video, not the video itself.

    It also uses the old, deprecated embed tag, which embeds a (probably) H.264 video inside a Flash player when Safari is capable of playing the video file by itself.

  26. Re:Video? by Yvan256 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Video which is hosted on YouTube on top of it all. It would have been easier to link directly to YouTube.

  27. Re:Video? by Combatso · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    dont know what to tell you man... other than 'you arent missing much'.

  28. They did by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    That's why so many old phone numbers are of the form word-numbers, like PEnnsylvania-65000. It just made them easier to remember, a word and five digits as opposed to 7 digits. They were just names, backfit to match the digits, so PEnnsylvania and ODeriferous were the same exchange. They were called exchanges, but I don't know if the public used that word in the same way that telephone engineers used it.

    1. Re:They did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Originally they were the FULL name PENNSYLVANIA or CLOVERDALE, and you would crank the phone, and ask for the Exchange you wanted to talk to, who would then route your call to the Exchange Operator, who could make the connection to the local telephone unit. When Direct Dialing went in (replacing the old Manual Switchboards), they kept the idea of the exchanges, and people were USED to the idea, so it migrated to the new phone layout.

      In the U.S. the first three digits (of the 7 digit phone number, excluding the area code), is STILL the Exchange and represents a general Service area (as far as the telephone company is concerned, although now that Cell phones and Number Portability are becoming more common, that distinction is finally blurring). That is why you and your neighbor often have the same starting digits on your phone (major metropolitan areas excepted).

      I imagine that as phone usage and direct dialing use increased, the exchanges initially contracted from the first three digits, to the first two digits, with the third representing the expansion of the initial Exchange (PEnnsylvania 1 - xxxx, PEnnsylvania 2 - xxxx, PEnnsylvania 3 - xxxx). At this point its mostly meaningless (as an exchange), but has been subverted for advertising purposes, but that has been around for a while also. :)

    2. Re:They did by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      That's all true, but when they went to direct dialing, they could have changed the exchange letters to digits, but they didn't, which I attribute to words being easier to memorize than just more digits, besides not wanting to upset the old customers. But new exchanges continued the policy.

  29. Advantage over drawing letters? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Instead of hitting the right spot, you have to "draw" something around those sectors. But drawing letters requires a not so different effort (if you want, old palm simplification of letters instead of "correct" ones) and this seem to have a steep learning curve. Still prefer my old N900 keyboard, if you can write complex shell commands and regular expressions with it, it must be good.

    1. Re:Advantage over drawing letters? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      I suspect one benefit of this is the ability to input text using only a thumb, much like one can on a numpad.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  30. Overly Complicated by rakuen · · Score: 1

    This seems like a really complex solution to a simple problem. It seems to me the premise for this is it's hard to type on a touch screen with your fingers. If only we could decrease the area of contact with the phone. Maybe a short, thin, plastic rod you could use to tap the screen...

    1. Re:Overly Complicated by whawk640 · · Score: 1

      A simpler keyboard with a similar concept is SlydeBoard for Android. It uses just 9 buttons. It's designed for touch typing with both thumbs. I can type the world-record texting phrase in about 0:58 and I'm still getting faster. None of that wussy auto-completion stuff though.

  31. STREET FIGHTER CONTROLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For my Android! Yipee!

  32. faster? that seems questionable at best by farble1670 · · Score: 1

    just watched the video. even if i memorized every gesture (quite a feat mind you) how could making a gesture be faster than one single press, which is what i have today?

    the only possibly advantage is success rate. for an on screen keyboard my success rate varies between 80-60%. depending on how tired i am and how much attention i'm paying. could this do better? it seems possible since you only need to move your finger from the center to 2 of the four large sections ... that are much larger than a key on an on screen keyboard. that's not taking into account simply making the incorrect gesture however. visually, it's quick to see the "G" on a keyboard than it is to look at this contraption and find the quadrant containing the "G" then seeing that it's the Nth character from the center.

    the other thing is that smooth continuous gestures depend on external factors like the amount of gunk on my screen, my fingers, and the humidity of my hand. a simple tap always works.

    anyway, kudos to them for the invention. seems like it should have been more of an r&d project than a product.

  33. This won't catch on. by slasho81 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    There's too much hassle in learning the system and becoming proficient in it. I use Swype which is phenomenal - it's fast and hardly requires any learning if you know the qwerty keyboard.

    1. Re:This won't catch on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Swype is just a stopgap until a real solution comes along. I'm not sure what that will be, either some sort of biofeedback (eg. hooked to your brain or maybe something else) or voice recognition.

      None of the current solutions are even close to ideal and are barely usable.

    2. Re:This won't catch on. by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      There's too much hassle in learning the system and becoming proficient in it. I use Swype which is phenomenal - it's fast and hardly requires any learning if you know the qwerty keyboard.

      The trade off is a steeper learning curve for a system that doesn't require direct attention to use. With swipe you must look at the keyboard. The theory with 8pen is that once you are proficient you can do it without looking at the screen (much like touch typing).

      Imagine this scenario: you are chatting with someone and also typing on your phone at the same time. Contrived but I do that on my computer when someone comes into my office (finish what I was typing while talking to them). With 8pen you should be able to look away from your phone and finish what you are writing, with swype that would be extremely difficult (due to the accuracy required). With 8pen you only need to remember the center point (which could be marked with a dot in future hardware if it gets adopted), with swype you need to know the relative position of all the characters.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:This won't catch on. by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Finally, I can text while driving! /sigh

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:This won't catch on. by slasho81 · · Score: 1

      I agree 8pen is a superior input method. However, I assert it won't catch on due to the difficult transition from the familiar methods which are not ideal but are still pragmatic enough.

    5. Re:This won't catch on. by dubbreak · · Score: 1

      Just like chorded keyboards.

      Yeah, I agree it most likely won't catch on.

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
  34. Accent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love her accent and want to shag her. Where is she from??

    1. Re:Accent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denmark. So while she sounds sexy as hell, she probably resembles a skeleton.

  35. Quikwriting? by lnx_daemon · · Score: 0

    Looks a lot like Quikwriting that I had installed on my palm 10 years ago.
    http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/demos/quikwriting2_1-rel-notes.html

  36. Common question by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What porn site are you playing with?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  37. Seems very tiring... by franciscohs · · Score: 1

    How much distance I would be traveling with my finger to write a message comparing to a virtual keyboard?, and on top of that I have to be dragging my finger through the screen as opposed to a virtual keyboard.

  38. Interesting but... by Xenious · · Score: 1

    I hate handwriting. Am curious to see if this gets faster past a learning curve. I find the two finger iPhone method to be pretty effective. I use my index finger as my left hand and my middle finger as my right hand and position them on the keyboard appropriately. I find I can usually fly right along.

    The issue with trying to leave the keyboard is the people that are totally used to it and can type fast are comfortable with seeking out the actual letters when laid out keyboard style. Change those locations and it becomes counter intuitive.

    --
    -Xen
  39. Already done in 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://mrl.nyu.edu/~perlin/demos/quikwriting.html

    Seems to be a better implementation of the same thing as the targets get bigger as you use them!

    This was even discussed on Slashdot in 1999 :

    http://slashdot.org/hardware/99/04/29/1734246.shtml

  40. Re:An Anonymous Reader Submitted This?? by DIplomatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What....??? ....I .... Wait.... Are you saying that a Slashdot news story covered.... an innovative piece of software that isn't free??? Well I never! This will not stand! Slashdot, I hereby tender my resignation, effective immediately!

  41. A Stylus is NOT the answer. by thygrrr · · Score: 1

    Oh please, everyone who suggests using a stylus...

    Have you ever used a decent capacitive screen (e.g. Samsung Galaxy, or any iDevice)?

    They are very precise and very responsive. Devices that require a pen also require you to pick up that pen first. I used a PalmOS device when these were still popular, and typing did work - but pulling out the pen was a serious hassle, and the tiny pens felt awkward.

    The only precision problem modern capacitive screens have is the curvature of the human finger, and the user's inability to properly see (or even estimate!) where his finger touches the glass. That's something I believe can be learned/trained, though, so it's important kids learn to use touch screens much like they learn to use a pencil.

    I think Palm's simplified alphabet would work awesomely on capacitive touch screens. It's just that patents block most of the innovation in this field (and 8pen is also patent pending... he great...)

  42. never going to happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My god this will be a miserable failure. You know nothing about humans if you think they are going to learn some crazy new writing that doesn't resemble anything they've done before, when they can just be stupid and type on an onscreen keyboard. This ain't happening, just like Dvorak even though it's superior.

  43. speech recognition by foodnugget · · Score: 1

    The speech recognition on my G2 is fannn-tastic. faster than i can peck out with the hardware keyboard. People look at you funny(er) at first, and it won't work well in a noisy environment, but definitely my preferred method of entry when possible.

  44. Re:Video? by Combatso · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    are you disputing that fact? I have also noticed this trend.

  45. Quite similar to Quikwriting in 1998 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It uses the same kind of gestures but with a different layout.

    http://www.google.nl/search?hl=&q=quikwriting

  46. Reminds me of Quikwriting by Animaether · · Score: 2, Informative

    Reminds me more of Quikwriting, actually...
    http://slashdot.org/hardware/99/04/29/1734246.shtml ...yup, 11 years old. Ken Perlin dabbled with input methods for a while there...
    http://cs.nyu.edu/~perlin/

    1. Re:Reminds me of Quikwriting by K8Fan · · Score: 1

      That's what I immediately thought of.

      Personally, I thought Quickwriting could adapt very easily to a IBM trackpoint type device (what one lesbian friend dubbed the "clit mouse") to allow text input via a device small enough to fit on the end of a device the size of a pen.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  47. Ripoff/copy/enhancement of quikwriting by dovgr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Based on the video this is the same idea as QuickWriting that I played around with on my PalmPilot a number of years ago. See: http://mrl.nyu.edu/projects/quikwriting/ The Quikwriting site says it has a patent on the method. So are we in for another litigation in the handheld area? Or is this the same technology under a different name?

  48. The devices still aren't "smart" enough by ElectricHaggis · · Score: 1

    So here is yet another interface that I have to learn in order to be able to make a device do what I want it to do. When are we going to get to a point where the devices learn how I want to interact with them?

    1. Re:The devices still aren't "smart" enough by nschubach · · Score: 1

      While neat in concept... you'd have to train it and you'd likely be turned off at first because your phone was trying to learn what you want.

      It would be like having a baby without the fun stuff.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  49. Interesting, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of the input method used on the Palm: Graffiti. With Graffiti, you had to learn how the Palm expected you to write the letters. Most was just uppercase versions of the letters, but some were quite different. It took a while to learn.

    It's easy enough to learn, but there was a case reported of someone saying that handwriting of those people using Graffiti was suffering. Sometimes they'd write a Graffiti version of the letter they were writing, or somewhere between the letter and the graffiti version. Flow of handwriting was an issue, and stunted writing doesn't look clear.

    I'm curious whether this method would cause a similar issue. It may not, as you are not writing with strokes that approximate the letters themselves, but will be interesting in the long run to see the effect.

    If I had 2.2 on my phone, I'd download this when it's available to try it out. Unfortunately, I have an X10, and am still waiting for the 2.1 upgrade to be make available to me... :(

    T.

  50. Re:An Anonymous Reader Submitted This?? by poena.dare · · Score: 1

    I know you'll find this surprising, but you can't resign from the Constantly Surprised department.

  51. 503 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    503 Slashdotted

  52. Re:Video? by Kilrah_il · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well, I put it in the "No shit, sherlock"-sort of insightful.

    --
    Whenever in an argument, remember this.
  53. Graffiti by Tomahawk · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the input method used on the Palm: Graffiti. With Graffiti, you had to learn how the Palm expected you to write the letters. Most was just uppercase versions of the letters, but some were quite different. It took a while to learn.

    It's easy enough to learn, but there was a case reported of someone saying that handwriting of those people using Graffiti was suffering. Sometimes they'd write a Graffiti version of the letter they were writing, or somewhere between the letter and the graffiti version. Flow of handwriting was an issue, and stunted writing doesn't look clear.

    I'm curious whether this method would cause a similar issue. It may not, as you are not writing with strokes that approximate the letters themselves, but will be interesting in the long run to see the effect.

    If I had 2.2 on my phone, I'd download this when it's available to try it out. Unfortunately, I have an X10, and am still waiting for the 2.1 upgrade to be make available to me... :(

    T. (repost - wasn't logged in last time)

    1. Re:Graffiti by hitmark · · Score: 1

      there have always been needs for fast input. Consider shorthand:
      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Shorthand

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  54. Re:An Anonymous Reader Submitted This?? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

    Nor can you resign from the Can't Understand Sarcasm department.

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  55. Good!Now, put it at the back of my device, please. by bwashed75 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If someone comes up with a device that uses something like this - but with the input at the back of the device - I'm sold. Just make some dints and bumps so that my finger knows where it is.

  56. How was the video made ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is video like this made ? Any specific tools ?

    1. Re:How was the video made ? by Cyko_01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      mspaint

  57. This is great! by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    Absolutely... an efficient one-handed input system. That'll be absolutely perfect for surfing porn^H^H^H^H^H^H reading Wikipedia articles...

  58. Reminds me of Quikwriting by insitus · · Score: 1

    This seems very similar to a decade old input method called Quikwriting.

  59. Why not just use Graffiti - available for Android by MCRocker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not just use Graffiti. I think it would be much easier to learn and provides visual feedback. It's also now available for Android platforms.

    Although very cool at the time, the original Apple Newton handwriting recognition recognition was somewhat weak and suffered from too much emphasis on predictive dictionary lookup. So much so that even a perfectly formed "falafel" always resulted in "father" until falafel was added to the dictionary. The solution was Graffiti. Later Newtons had much better handwriting recognition and Graffiti was no longer needed, but the Palm Pilot, a Newton competitor, adopted Graffiti and was, thus able to run on much cheaper hardware and take over the PDA market. After many years, legal wrangling put the ownership of Graffiti in the hands of Access, which has made it available for Android.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  60. SlydeBoard may be easier! by whawk640 · · Score: 1

    I think SlydeBoard (http://whawk640.robotdrone.com/Android/index.php) has less of a learning curve than this! Still, it looks interesting, I'll try it!

  61. Try This by whawk640 · · Score: 1

    Try SlydeBoard while you're at it. Touch type all keys. Use both thumbs on your cel-phone like you use both hands on a real keyboard.

  62. Re:Video? by Yvan256 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Someone's broken code doesn't display in my browser, I say that fact and that's trolling? Some people shouldn't have mod points at all.

  63. Like a Rotary Telephone by shadow_slicer · · Score: 1

    The usage demonstration in the video reminded me of an old rotary telephone. It seems very slow and awkward to use.

  64. Re:Video? by B4light · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think it is correlated to the number of Somalian pirates

  65. The worst of Swype and chorded keyboards by Fencepost · · Score: 1

    Really, this makes me think of chorded keyboards like the Twiddler. Sure I could learn it eventually, but I think it'd still be slower than Swype or even than hunt & peck on a reasonably-sized on-screen keyboard. The main thing I think this is addressing is inaccuracy in hitting keys on an on-screen keyboard, and it's doing it in what feels to me like a very Rube Goldberg-esque manner.

    Hell, I'm not even programming for Android and I think I could reimplement Graffiti faster than I could get comfortable with writing with this.

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
    1. Re:The worst of Swype and chorded keyboards by tiptyper · · Score: 1

      Talking about Android and chording keyboards... A big problem with chording has been the learning curve i.e. you have to memorize the combos representing characters and functions. The touch screens now seem to solve this major obstacle, at least partly, by being able to change the symbols on keys depending on what other keys are pressed. It is possible to try a touch screen chording keyboard on Linux (=Android). The GKOS app has large keys and has been published for both iPhone and Android. You need a device with a genuine multitouch screen of high resolution for that.

  66. Not liking it by erroneus · · Score: 1

    While keyboard has its problems, this thing is so foreign that it makes the learning curve too steep to even consider by a busy person.

    On the other hand, Palm's Graffiti system is simple and effective. Back in the day, I was using graffiti quickly and easily. It should be used here as well.

    Further, what about foreign entry? Not so sure their "commonly used characters" notion works as well when used in a non-English scenario. So while keyboard style entry is not the most appropriate method for mobile devices, it is the most natural one for various reasons.

    I hate "swipe" too. Like it or not, key-style entry is the way that works best for humans because we use computers. The layout of the keys is the way we are most accustomed. The rare adoption of the "Dvorak" layout is a sign that it has essentially been rejected by the masses in spite of how long it has been around.

    The problem of keyboards on mobile/pocket devices will not likely be solved by anything "too new." Graffiti attempts to solve the problem in a way that resembles handwriting recognition and is far more natural. What's more, for more complex characters, drawing them as I did with kana and kanji characters on the palm devices also worked. So if there is a replacement for the keyboard, it needs to be based on something people already do. Hopefully people still know how to write.

  67. Re:An Anonymous Reader Submitted This?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you CAN resign from the Needlessly Point out Others' Flaws department.

  68. Iambic Morse Paddle by Ozoner · · Score: 1

    I'm wasting my breath of course, but the good old Iambic Morse Paddle does all of this and is simple and easy to learn. Faster too.

    (the dual paddle "squeeze key", not the old style morse key)

  69. Looks very slow by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    If it gets close or even hits the speed of handwriting, that's nice. But we type, in part, because typing is faster than hand-writing.

    This is not going to be as fast as a keyboard.

    1. Re:Looks very slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touch-typing on touchscreen-only phone, much?

  70. Blind Type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blind Type looks much more interesting and easy to use, if you are used to keyboard typing.

  71. OCR by Dr.+Zed · · Score: 1

    If you are going to have to make arcane gestures for each letter, you might as well go the route of optical character recognition. At least that way, you don't have to learn a whole new way to write each letter for your mobile device.

  72. Graffiti would work for me. by crovira · · Score: 1

    I still have a Handspring Visor.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  73. funny... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    i thought that keyboards where around long before the age of computers...

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  74. Dasher?! by maweki · · Score: 1

    Oh, this is nice, they're doing exactly what Dasher does but you have to pay money for it.

    Just waiting for the patent trolls.

    1. Re:Dasher?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8pen is completly different from Dasher, as it doesn't to any prediction or dynamic layouting. 8pen is much closer to a basic pie-menu, only with the specialty that the content of the "sub-menu" containing the letters will change depending on if you swipe clockwise or counter-clockwise.

  75. Not mutually exclusive or a misconception by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

    "That is a common misconception. The QWERTY arrangement was designed to put common "chords" at opposite sides of the keyboard, so that the hammers on a typewriter wouldn't catch on each other and jam."

    It is not a common misconception. In fact you just made the GPs point. The keys would jam because the hammers were being actuated in such a way that one would still be in its swiping range while the other started its own action. This resulted in hammers jamming. By rearranging the keys so that typing was slower the hammers had more time to get out of each others way. In other words, you were both correct (except the part about the misconception")

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  76. Get off my lawn, kid! by mcneely.mike · · Score: 1

    Heck, i remember when we used to hook up the mule to the cart and drive to Pennsylvania (the whole way there and back was uphill... in a snowstorm!)

    --
    soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
  77. Re:Video? by flowwolf · · Score: 1

    Despite a tag being deprecated, safari is being irresponsible by not implementing it. I can remember when IE implemented a new rendering engine and "broke the internet"

    I guess it doesn't matter when an insignificant market share holder doesn't do things properly. People just use what works in the end.

  78. One-handed input - one-handed output FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Nuff said.

  79. qwerty is still stuck in the past by dokebi · · Score: 1

    That may be true, but QWERTY was created before the understanding of typing mechanics and ergonomics, and thus missed out on a lot of easy optimizations. For example, when you drum your fingers on the desk, it's much easier to drum pinky->index then index-> pinky. Dvorak layout takes advantage of this.

    I can type 100+ words per minute in either layout after a little warm-up. I *much* prefer to type at that speed in Dvorak than in qwerty. It feels a lot more comfortable.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, articles before post read *you*!
  80. Some people missed the true point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the key thing about this is that you won't have to "think" anymore when you input text. Right now, if I type on my PC keyboard, I don't think about typing. I think the words, and my hands automatically make them appear. Same thing when I write; I think the words, and my the words appear on the paper by themselves.

    However, typing on a phone, is actually fairly involved. You do have to "think" about it. Your eyes need to find the key, and carefully control your finger so it taps in the correct spot. Even Swype requires quite a bit of attention, since you need to guide your fingers to very specific spots.

    This thing, however, requires no real "accuracy." You simply move your finger up, down, left, or right, and then do circles, curves, or figure eights. Once you memorize the placement of keys, inputting text is just swishing your finger around without thinking; without even looking at the letters (see how at the end it suggests maybe just getting rid of everything, except the center point?)

    ----

    Basically, the general attitude about writing on mobile devices is "Who cares about writing a lot on your phone? If you want to write a long email, use a computer." But why does it have to be like that? Why can't you comfortably type something long on a phone? It's because the QWERTY layout doesn't work for that, and probably never will, no matter how much prediction and auto-correction is thrown on.

  81. no improvements in 10 years by evilviper · · Score: 1

    First off, this looks like a nightmare to learn... Why do" hunt and peck" typists type so slow? It's not the "peck" part... Completely rearranging a keyboard is a sure way to give yourself a 100 meter sheer cliff of a learning curve... If you've used a keyboard frequently for a couple years, qwerty is so hard coded in your muscle memory that switching to a simple alphabetical layout is painful. I say this as a dual dvorak/qwerty typist, who has extensively used (not just toyed with) a great many small-format mobile devices over decades (typing on my droid2 right now).

    The immutible facts I've learned from all this is that:
      A) The best mobile devies out there today have barely made any improvements over the PDAs of 10+ years ago. I'm hard-pressed to come up with something an iphone/droid does that my Cassiopeia E-100 or Psion 5mx couldn't do way back when.

    B) The keyboard is still the overwhelimingly fastest and easiest way to input any amout of data. Yeah, even a couple digits, its still faster to flip out a full keyboards. For getting actual work done, nothing I've seen to this day compares with my old Psion 5mx for the simple reason that it has a keyboard large enough to touch type on, yet fits in a pocket.

    I could list 100 other reasons too, starting with a B&W LCD viewable in any light, and so low power it remains on for several minutes of inactivity... and similarly, the keyboard as well as other buttons that are always functional thanks to a flip-open case design that avoids the need for cumbersome speedbumps like screen unlock sequences. And did I mention it was made to be tethered to cell phones for wireless internet from the very start? And that it allowed writing up full office documents with common formatting, embedding of other documents and files, and even directly printing these documents to any printer with IRDA (or wired serial) quite easily? Psion, of course, became Symbian, and never reclaimed its vaunted position as the neceassary tool of the business travler.

    The month of battery life was a nice feature too... but what do we have now? The same battery life on a smartphone that I was getting from an E-100 circa '00.

    But I digress. The idea of kinda-sorta-like-writing idea was tried repeatedly in the PDA days as well, with a forward loop being an A, backward loop being an O, and the like. It wasn't workable then, and I don't see a tiny target area with a scrambled alphabet helping. If you can't get full qwerty, 10-key is probably next-best. On-screen pseudo keyboards need to die already. And while slide out qwerty is infinitely better than nothing, a device you can set on your desk/armrest makes the difference between the toy phones out there, and a real, productive computing device. Of course rock-solid apps with a good interface and desktop equivalent features are needed, but a full-speed input deice is a prereq, and nothing comes close to competing with the tried and true touch-type keyboard.

    Yeah, i know, tablets make nice toys too despite to lack of keyboards, just like PDAs did, and were projected to take over the world in their heyday as well...

    Until devices like that start coming out (again...) write off the smartphone's delusions of grandure and large budget advertising to the same effect, and accept that a netbook is the smallest device you're going to be able to find on which you can actually do non-trivial amounts of work. Yes, the neato-factor convinces people their teeny device with a web browser can do everything their desktop can do, but the shine fades quickly, and with much pain and money spent, you'll merely learn the exact same things I've stated above.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  82. Hardly innovative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tested a similar app on my PalmPilot 10 years ago. Although I can't find the original app any more, http://www.thumbscript.com/ seems quite close to that.
    That was hard to use at that time, but the visual layout here may make it easier.

  83. I don't think it can compete with Swype... by elFisico · · Score: 1

    ... especially Swype on a non-qwerty key layout. Come on, we already know that it is better to spread out those often-used chars...

    And maybe someone can figure out a way to make my fingers transparent so I can finally see where that next key is I want to swype to... :-)

  84. Did something similar. by Kim0 · · Score: 1

    As the author of Pentaput, yet another writing tool for the iPhone, I have some experience with the kind of problems with this concept.
    The main problem is that the friction on the screen varies a lot, depending on temperature and amount of finger grease on the screen.
    When slippery, it works quite O.K., but else wise, which is the usual, just touching ordinary small keys works slightly better.

    I might find a solution to this, if I had the time, but I do not.

  85. size of highlight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The size of the highlighted letter is too small with all that free space they need to make it pop huge. It should obviously appear in the center since that is the only place your finger won't go.

  86. What caught my eye was something else by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    This is what you're talking about:
    http://www.androlib.com/android.application.com-access_company-graffiti-jjziA.aspx

    As an ex-TealScript user, this is a sorry thing to be using: it's Graffiti 1, it's not customisable in any way, it still takes up half the bloody screen, and as you say is hard to use with a sausage-sized stylus.

    What caught my eye was around 3:44 in the video -- the part where they say that you really only need the dot or central ring -- it would be very awesome indeed if this turns out to be a transparent keyboard that can be shown over the actual UI. I'm keeping an eye on this, but I don't dare hope.

  87. Re:Why not just use Graffiti - available for Andro by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

    This is what you're talking about:
    http://www.androlib.com/android.application.com-access_company-graffiti-jjziA.aspx

    As an ex-TealScript user, this is a very sorry thing to be using: it's Graffiti 1, it's not customisable in any way, it still takes up half the bloody screen, and as you say is hard to use with a sausage-sized stylus.

    What did catch my eye was around 3:44 in the video -- the part where they say that you really only need the dot or central ring -- it would be very awesome indeed if this turns out to be a transparent keyboard that can be shown over the actual UI. I'm keeping an eye on this, but I don't dare hope.

    Or just give me TealScript for Android...

  88. Yearning for Graffiti by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 1

    Having learned one set of gestures on my 1st Palm and a 2nd set when things changed to Graffiti 2, and gone into frustration-mode when they got dropped, this seems like a reasonably good idea.

  89. Re: This is what you're talking about by MCRocker · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the feedback. I'm in no rush to use either of these since I have a device with a physical keyboard and they totally neglect thumb typing in all of the scenarios discussed. As far as the size, it doesn't look like it takes up much more room than the regular software keyboard, so I don't see that as a uniquely serious drawback.

    The first link in the original post is to the product home page. It does seem to be the same thing you're referring to. There are also videos on that page that look fairly compelling. Their FAQ makes it seem like they do plan to add customization at some point.

    Something that can be operated with one hand using the thumb would be ideal. There were also some interesting motion input strategies back when Palm was de rigueur, but they were all proprietary and expensive and went nowhere at the time.

    --
    Signatures are a waste of bandwi (buffering...)
  90. It will put a lot of strain on the thumb. by master_p · · Score: 1

    One-handed messaging is usually performed with the thumb. The thumb can easily push the little buttons on the small keyboard of a mobile phone, or the virtual keyboards of newer phones, but it cannot do cyclic movements consistently without being strained too much.

    If you are curious about this, take a small glass and try to wipe it using your thumb by doing circular movements. Sooner than later, you'll feel the pain.