6) Kukilainen from TTVK makes a note saying, "we only track IPs and we will take this to court"
You mean Kotilainen?
Is there a way, or have people analyzed the possible honey-trap files allegedly used? Steganographend information would be hard to find but I'd be interested to know what is the current practical situation on the topic?
What kind of products there are on the market?
Which companies TTVK/CIAPC use as their contractors to do this?
Hei, come on guys! As a fellow finn I can say IT'S YOU that have the inferiority complex - not the people who put up the award. So obvious. What the heck does it matter anyway, so to speak, if we have this award? You complain, you have the complex!
What we really need is an exchange service to route POTS calls to VoIP. I see no reasons why this could not be done.
Company A sets up the exchange, customer gets a normal phone number and says logged in with proper client, VoIP software, mobile device, or what-ever, and is responsible (to him-/herself) for standing by.
The aunt Annie would be very happy to dial the good old land line (?) number.
POTS and VoIP should only be considered as techniques to transmit data. Customers use devices with handsets, microphones, and ear plugs. What's in between should not matter.
Company A could also offer a web (or email) access to additional modern services like voice mail and fax inbox (which are already available for mobile phone users, though).
How do companies/BSA count the losses caused by software piracy?
If they estimate the amount/count of pirated software and multiply that with the number on the price tag, they are out in the woods I think.
Prize makes a difference. As I was in China back in '97 I picked up every pop CD on stock because they were so dam cheap (eh, wanted to get broad sample of that funny stuff). I wouldn't have done that with official prices.
Slashdot Mirror
6) Kukilainen from TTVK makes a note saying, "we only track IPs and we will take this to court"
You mean Kotilainen?
Is there a way, or have people analyzed the possible honey-trap files allegedly used? Steganographend information would be hard to find but I'd be interested to know what is the current practical situation on the topic?
What kind of products there are on the market?
Which companies TTVK/CIAPC use as their contractors to do this?
But if I set the https only option in preferences, I'm not able to use Gmail Mobile App anymore. It seems to reset the connection or something :(
So, this means the Gmail Mobile App is insecure too!?
Hei, come on guys! As a fellow finn I can say IT'S YOU that have the inferiority complex - not the people who put up the award. So obvious. What the heck does it matter anyway, so to speak, if we have this award? You complain, you have the complex!
What we really need is an exchange service to route POTS calls to VoIP. I see no reasons why this could not be done.
Company A sets up the exchange, customer gets a normal phone number and says logged in with proper client, VoIP software, mobile device, or what-ever, and is responsible (to him-/herself) for standing by.
The aunt Annie would be very happy to dial the good old land line (?) number.
POTS and VoIP should only be considered as techniques to transmit data. Customers use devices with handsets, microphones, and ear plugs. What's in between should not matter.
Company A could also offer a web (or email) access to additional modern services like voice mail and fax inbox (which are already available for mobile phone users, though).
Wake me up when it's done, +358nospam505566677.
How do companies/BSA count the losses caused by software piracy?
If they estimate the amount/count of pirated software and multiply that with the number on the price tag, they are out in the woods I think.
Prize makes a difference. As I was in China back in '97 I picked up every pop CD on stock because they were so dam cheap (eh, wanted to get broad sample of that funny stuff). I wouldn't have done that with official prices.
PS-Ever heard the Lemon Tree in chinese?
..or actually some "real data" really encrypted. The point would be to increase their post-filter (?) CPU time.