Slashdot Mirror


Police Raid Home of 9-Year-Old Pirate Bay User, Seize "Winnie the Pooh" Laptop

zacharye writes "Copyright enforcement might be getting out of hand in Scandinavia. As anti-piracy groups and copyright owners continue to work with authorities to curtail piracy in the region, police this week raided the home of a 9-year-old suspect and confiscated her "Winnie the Pooh" laptop. TorrentFreak reports that the girl's home was raided after local anti-piracy group CIAPC determined copyrighted files had been downloaded illegally at her residence. Her father, the Internet service account holder, was contacted by CIAPC, which demanded that he pay a 600 euro fine and sign a non-disclosure agreement to settle the matter. When the man did not comply, authorities raided his home and collected evidence, including his 9-year-old daughter's notebook computer."

376 comments

  1. Sensational! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A pretty sensationalist summary of what can only be charitably described as an article, which itself is long on innuendo but short on actual, you know, "facts".

    All that can really be said is that they raided the guys house and among other things took the childâ(TM)s laptop. There is no evidence in this story that the child was the primary suspect or even a suspect at all.

    The most that can really be said is the 600 euro fine (and the non-disclosure agreement) is absurd for what the alleged crime is.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Sensational! by Swampash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Big Media, winning hearts and minds.

    2. Re:Sensational! by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Informative

      I remember when a member of an abandonware IRC channel got raided back in the late 90s. They took his game consoles, music CDs, and anything they felt like "as evidence".
      Never did find out what came of that. Seemed like a lot of effort wasted on someone whose big thing was collecting classic games like Alley Cat.

    3. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From reading the story it seems like the father admitted that the daughter tried to download some songs but was unable to because the download failed for some reason so they went out and the CD she wanted. While I don't agree with the way the music industry handles all of this I don't pirate content because I don't want to deal with this crap. But on the same note I buy very very very little music now. I used to buy CDs or when itunes came out albums all the time at least one a month. Now I'm lucky if I buy one song a year.

    4. Re:Sensational! by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 4, Informative

      The girl was one that tried to download copyrighted material. She did not know what she was doing was illegal. She tired to google it, and came across pirate bay. Read the TorrentFreak article. It is more informative.

    5. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to TorrentFreak, the girl tried to download a number of songs by Finnish pop star Chisu using The Pirate Bay, where she was led after searching for the songs on Google (GOOG). The downloads failed, according to the girl’s father, and the two went to a local store the following day to purchase a Chisu album. ISPs working with CIAPC flagged the activity, however, and the group’s anti-piracy procedures went into effect.

      Emphasis added.

    6. Re:Sensational! by Zemran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one should be expected to sign a non disclosure agreement in relation to something like this. I would also refuse. If I had in fact been downloading stuff in a country where downloading is not allowed, I would consider the 600 Euro settlement but to be asked to sign away any right to argue to legality or fairness of my treatment should be illegal.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    7. Re:Sensational! by symbolset · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This artist is about to get global fame beyond her wildest hopes. Literally. Her name is all over the news and the blogs internationally. People have started their tirades on her facebook wall. One Reddit thread has 3000 balance of up/down votes and 2000 comments and will be trending for a week. It's a shame she was never represented by these copyright trolls in the first place, or she would deserve it. Maybe she should sue the trolls? Defamation of character or something?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    8. Re:Sensational! by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Additionally and to add to the absurdity of the CIAPC response:

      Indeed upon hearing about the situation Chisu apologized to the 9-year-old and pointed to a link on Spotify where her music can be played for free"

      http://www.techspot.com/news/50888-police-raid-targets-9-year-old-pirate-winnie-the-pooh-laptop-seized.html

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    9. Re:Sensational! by game+kid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Never did find out what came of that. Seemed like a lot of effort wasted on someone whose big thing was collecting classic games like Alley Cat.

      What do you mean? They now have his game consoles, music CDs, and anything they felt like taking "as evidence". The effort paid off (for the raiders)!

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    10. Re:Sensational! by TheLink · · Score: 0

      That's nice but the music as recorded might not be 100% hers to say its free or not. If it isn't she may be aiding and abetting copyright infringement.

      If an Adobe Photoshop developer working for Adobe publicly pointed out where people could download Photoshop for free that does not automatically make everything OK.

      Of course it would be even more bad PR to try to take Chisu down- the legit customers would be unhappy. In contrast only a minority of the photoshop customers would care if the adobe photoshop developer got in big trouble.

      --
    11. Re:Sensational! by jimmosk · · Score: 5, Insightful
    12. Re:Sensational! by GumphMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The most that can really be said is the 600 euro fine (and the non-disclosure agreement) is absurd for what the alleged crime is.

      I agree it is absurd, but not because of the amount involved. It's not a 600 Euro fine levied by a court after due process, but an extortion payment to a private enterprise. The NDA is designed to ensure that similar extortion targets cannot challenge assertions on the part of the extorter such as, "Everyone settles for 600 Euros," or "Fifty-thousand people thought it better to settle than fight." The NDA also serves as part of the threat: dare to go public about our extortion racket and we will sue you into the stone age for breach of contract. Suing for breach of contract is a much easier target. The sooner we start treating the extortive threat of legal action as a crime the better.

      --
      Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
    13. Re:Sensational! by DeeEff · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not only is she 9 years old, but she never actually SUCCESSFULLY pirated anything. She never broke any law.

      Furthermore, her father took her to the store and actually PAID FOR THE CONTENT the very next day. 600 Euros in damages for a crime that wasn't committed claiming damages that were.... what? How were they damaged? They didn't even lose a sale. So I guess this whole thing is bollocks then, and there should be no reason for them to raid a home and start taking things on a whim.

    14. Re:Sensational! by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      It is. I would love to see a 9 year convicted by the jury for copyright infringement.

      PS: I realize, this is not in the US, but still.

    15. Re:Sensational! by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hope this is one of those moments where you're about to slap your forehead when you realize just what you said, but Chisu pointed the girl to Spotify, which is a completely above-board music streaming service that's widely used by millions upon millions of people and that pays royalty fees. I think it's kinda assumed that everyone at Slashdot knows what Spotify is, since it's pretty well-known and has come up here on a number of occasions. So, Chisu pointed the girl to a place where the girl could access the music legally and for free. It's not at all like the analogy you drew.

    16. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except Spotify is legal...

    17. Re:Sensational! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The most that can really be said is the 600 euro fine (and the non-disclosure agreement) is absurd for what the alleged crime is.

      I am hard pressed to think of a situation where the cause of justice could possibly be served by the authorities demanding a gag order as part of a prosecution.

      During the process of evidence collection, when they might tip off somebody else involved in the case, there is at least a cogent argument to be made(though this situation is dangerously vulnerable to abuse, *cough* 'national security letters' *cough*), and there are also arguments in favor of NDAs for the benefit of the suspect or perpetrator(for the suspect, to protect them from a media frenzy and the usual 'charged = guilty' reporting, especially in the case of emotive stuff like kiddie fiddling, the perp similarly, if there is reason to believe that they will get lynched on the outside); but what argument can be made for an NDA in favor of the authorities?

      Surely, they would want the public to see justice being done? Surely, they would be delighted to have an example of a criminal receiving just punishment be visible? Certainly, they would not mind having an opposing attorney scrutinize their no-doubt-iron-clad case? Prosecutorial secrecy reeks of impropriety...

    18. Re:Sensational! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      The girl was one that tried to download copyrighted material. She did not know what she was doing was illegal.

      Yeah, that's what I would tell the cops, too.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    19. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought copyright infringement is/was a civil matter and not subject to criminal actions taken against the accused. I hope the police officers sleep well after seizing a child's computer.

    20. Re:Sensational! by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      The supreme court has no problem with forced arbitration, so stuff like this is just the next step.

    21. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to TorrentFreak, the girl tried to download a number of songs by Finnish pop star Chisu using The Pirate Bay, where she was led after searching for the songs on Google (GOOG).

      Does this mean Google is implicated in the distribution of pirated media? After all, the little girl used Google's search engine and was led to The Pirate Bay by a corporation which has long touted it's "don't be evil" mantra. It seems to me that the CIAPC should be raiding the Google headquarters and all affiliated offices around the world. Oh right! Google is a corporation worth billions of dollars, not some child innocently led astray by a corporation's services, namely the search engine.

      Think of the children. Lock them all in prison for their own protection. Sign the UN-backed petition today.

    22. Re:Sensational! by Yomers · · Score: 1

      Yes, thats a significant triumph of law and order over mayhem and chaos, and should be celebrated by all law abiding world citizens! I, for one, applaud fearless Scandinavian law enforcement officers, and congratulate them with successful completion of this important and dangerous assignment! Girl should be re-educated in specialized correctional facilities, and the tool of the crime, namely Winnie the Pooh laptop, destroyed.

    23. Re:Sensational! by thej1nx · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Just quoting a few nuggets that were the basis of having copyrights at all

      .
      Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries".

      Thomas Jefferson : Art. 9. Monopolies may be allowed to persons for their own productions in literature and their own inventions in the arts for a term not exceeding — years but for no longer term and no other purpose.[9]

      Copyright Act of 1976 : Barbara Ringer, the U.S. Register of Copyrights, called the new law "a balanced compromise that comes down on the authors' and creators' side in almost every instance.

      So a question here... did RIAA sing this song? Because all the instances I can find(I quoted a few above), say that copyright laws were pushed on pretext of protecting authors, inventors and creators. But here you are coming and advocating that the an author/creator should be persecuted for infringing "their own" creations. Unless, you can point out the songs that RIAA and MPAA executives sang along with her. I am waiting. Go ahead...

      The mills that produce the paper I use for making a painting, the middlemen I hire for something, the marketing firm I hire to promote my products, should have ZERO rights to prosecute me criminally over "infringing" my own creations. If you advocate for laws to PROMOTE progress of science and other useful Arts, then you should also PROHIBIT and deem conflicting any laws that DISSUADE progress of science and other useful Arts by allowing original creators themselves to be imprisoned and fined millions for "copyright infingment", instead of just being sued for a breach of contract for exact/actual damages caused.

      And if you are seriously advocating to pay the police and prison employees from PUBLIC tax money, to protect and enforce the interests of PRIVATE corporates... instead of taking the usual civil suits route... you have to be either a RIAA/MPAA crony or certifiably batshit insane.

    24. Re:Sensational! by thej1nx · · Score: 5, Funny
      And if you are seriously advocating to pay the police and prison employees from PUBLIC tax money, to protect and enforce the interests of PRIVATE corporates... instead of taking the usual civil suits route... you have to be either a RIAA/MPAA crony or certifiably batshit insane

      .
      ...or of course, a US senator, who are usually both.

    25. Re:Sensational! by thej1nx · · Score: 2

      Actually CIAPC should be raiding the sony corporation headoffice and other media houses etc. for helping the song to be published in the first place. If there was no song in the first place, it can be correctly argued that google would have had nothing to lead to. We need to arrest the media houses executives/employees, I guess, and implicate them for facilitating and promoting piracy. They too are corporations worth billions of dollars, not some child innocently led astray by a corporation's services, namely their music production. :)

    26. Re:Sensational! by purpledinoz · · Score: 2

      That's true, it's illegal to urinate in public, we should jail all 5 year old kids who pee their pants in public. It's against the law!

    27. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dare to go public about our extortion racket and we will sue you into the stone age for breach of contract. Suing for breach of contract is a much easier target.

      This won't luckily be the case in finland. Pretty hard to sue anyone back to stone age here.

    28. Re:Sensational! by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      oh really? Is that why children can be convicted of crimes right?

    29. Re:Sensational! by purpledinoz · · Score: 2

      Should people unconditionally follow the law? It's not a long time ago that it was against the law to hide Jewish families to protect them from being murdered.

    30. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Some kind soul provided these two links in the submission comments:
      https://torrentfreak.com/police-raid-9-year-old-pirate-bay-girl-confiscate-winnie-the-pooh-laptop-121122/
      http://techcrunch.com/2012/11/22/finnish-police-seize-9-year-olds-winnie-the-pooh-laptop-for-using-the-pirate-bay/

      Also, a blog post from the local EFF:
      http://www.effi.org/blog/2012-11-22-copyright-blackmail.html

    31. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That really depends where you live.

    32. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to try to thread-jack so you can randomly rant about how much you hate someone, you should at least have the courtesy to put some effort into your shitty segues.

    33. Re:Sensational! by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      The most that can really be said is the 600 euro fine (and the non-disclosure agreement) is absurd for what the alleged crime is.

      You're right. Compared to what the RIAA and MPAA have been chasing in US courts, this is bordering on downright reasonable.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    34. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't pirate content because I don't want to deal with this crap.

      It's astronomically unlikely that you'll ever be caught. In fact, if you're not an ignoramus, you can make it even more unlikely.

      There's really nothing to worry about if you're not an idiot.

    35. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of what happened to Steve Jackson Games. Simply because one of their employees answered a question on a forum (unrelated to the company) about what a specific download protocol was for, the feds staged a raid on them (a book publisher) and took everything electronic in the place, as well as paper copies of their latest book.

    36. Re:Sensational! by deimtee · · Score: 1

      They can, and frequently do, place gag orders to benefit the victims. Many people don't want all the gory details of what they went through plastered all over the media.
      Here in Aust it's automatic in any case involving a minor (victim or offender).

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    37. Re:Sensational! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      If the artist has no say in how or when or to whom the music might be distributed - then the artist has become a slave.

      Imagine that - slavery in Europe?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    38. Re:Sensational! by symbolset · · Score: 2

      Hunh? Reddit is actually turning into a major political force.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    39. Re:Sensational! by upside · · Score: 1

      The Electronic Frontier Foundation's take on it.

      What puzzles me is how is the NDA supposed to threaten other downloaders. They ought to take lessons from a despot on how to make an example, usually public hangings are public for a reason. The NDA is clearly there to keep a lid on their activities, because drawing the spotlight is bad for them.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    40. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      None of that applies outside the United States. The intellectual property theory is actually quite a bit more "socialistic" in the US than what you hear in Europe, where author rights are regarded as inalienable. Thus, the US and European attitudes wrt real property and intellectual property are flipped.

      For example, there's no first-sale doctrine in Finland. Libraries have to pay extra for the privilege of lending books. Video rental stores can't rent out consumer DVD's without a separate license. Playing songs is not free for Finnish radio stations.

    41. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to TorrentFreak, the girl tried to download a number of songs by Finnish pop star Chisu using The Pirate Bay, where she was led after searching for the songs on Google (GOOG). The downloads failed, according to the girl’s father, and the two went to a local store the following day to purchase a Chisu album. ISPs working with CIAPC flagged the activity, however, and the group’s anti-piracy procedures went into effect.

      Did you read the story? The GIRL tried to download songs............ How is she not a suspect? Now either her father tried too, or she did without him being aware, and failed. He could be trying to blamed it off on his daughter hoping they would not bother to charge a 9-year old. His argument is not all adults no how to use a computer so how would a 9-year-old she did not know what she was doing was illegal.

      But the girl knew how to use the computer and download with it, so his logic is flawed. And they sent him a notice that he or she was downloading illegal content, not sure if they sent him a copy of the idiot law/enforcement code/law (or whatever you want to call it).

    42. Re:Sensational! by hsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hi!

      The story is based on Facebook posts, which are in Finnish. Luckily, I am a Finnish person, and here is my take:

      1) TTVK allegedly posts a Pirate Bay Torrent with latest cd from the Finnish artist Chisu (crappy music, that appeals to youth)
      2) This guy claims his daughter downloaded it while "googling for test samples for album she didn't have money to buy at the time"
      3) TTVK sends an angry letter, demanding 600 euros and demanding that you sign NDA about the agreement to pay
      4) Police comes to raid the man's home, several months later, taking only the laptop of his daughter, and saying things like "just pay the bill, it is not that much" and "if you pay, we will go away and leave you alone"
      5) Guy decides to fight it, does not sign the NDA and makes a Facebook post
      6) Kukilainen from TTVK makes a note saying, "we only track IPs and we will take this to court"
      7) Artist posts on her Facebook page "I don't want to sue my fans, but I think these TTVK guys are not so bad as you think"
      8) Anti-piracy party in Finland blames the artists for not taking a stand, praises the guy for his heroism and demanding law reforms
      9) Police makes a statement, that they are investing the father's part in this and it becomes clear, that the guy own's a bar and has live performances - so he should be aware of intellectual property rights.

      The general atmosphere here in Finland is, that artists and contributors generally do want compensation, want this particular case to go away , and TTVK to resume business as usual and normal people are waking up to reality of our crappy copyright laws. One university law professor stated, that legistlation is a result from lobbying campaign from TTVK and should not ever have passed in its current form.

      Links:
      http://antipiracy.fi/inenglish/

    43. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reductio ad absurdum. Note the unconditionally.

    44. Re:Sensational! by vlad30 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Are your sure it was the police ? Lets see

      1) Obtain Police looking uniform

      2) print out official looking warrants

      3) raid house and collect desirables

      4) profit

      Hmmm no ??? step the gnomes would be proud

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    45. Re:Sensational! by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

      Or, you just may be making enough that it is not worth your time to spend the effort to protect yourself against malware and the -AA goons.

      There isn't all that much media I'm interested in, and I can easily afford it. If anything, I would like to help artists/programers to generate more good stuff.

      In my book, if you are pirating stuff, you are a combination of (1) poor (2) greedy (3) having something to prove (4) an asshole.

      I'm at worst (4) and I have other ways of displaying that.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    46. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US has a penchant for exporting out its laws and policies. If these don't apply in your country yet, then you are just ranked lower on the priority list. Wait a year or two, and it will apply to you as well, soon enough.

    47. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The child WAS primary suspect as it says so in warrant. The father of course is carrier in legal case as she is minor and lives at his father house. ( I have friend investigator from secret police who has first hand knowledge of this case).

      The case has now been made as political one.

      And not even radio or news papers (biggest or small ones) tell the small fact from Finland copyright law, that downloading from internet for private use isn't illegal, only condemned. BUT, sharing to unknown people is illegal!

      In Finnish copyright law (http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1961/19610404 only Finnish and Swedish), it is allowed to people to make copies of legally obtained media for*:

      Julkistetusta teoksesta saa jokainen valmistaa muutaman kappaleen yksityistä käyttöään varten. Siten valmistettua kappaletta ei ole lupa käyttää muuhun tarkoitukseen.

      Rought translation:

      From published material everyone can make few copies for private use. Such made copy isn't allowed to use another purpose

      what means simply put (check end of this post for source):

      1) Own private use
      2) Family use
      3) To closest friends (your best friend etc)

      *) http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1961/19610404#e-7

      There are few rules in that:

      1) you can make "few copies". (In earlier court that has been ruled to be 10 or under copies)
      2) the original (master) needs to be maintained
      a) if you sell original, you need to destroy all copies
      b) if you lose original, you need to destroy all copies
      c) if original gets destroyed (scratches etc) you need to keep it in safe, so you can continue using copies.
      3) You can not make new copies of copies, you need always use the original one to make copies
      4) You can not sell copies, leave them anywhere else or give them anyone else than family members and best friends

      In Finland, nearly every storage device includes a tax what was added to copyright law at 80's when C-casettes came common one. The tax is depending about storage size (it was about C- and VHS casette tape recording lenght) and it is tens of cents or few dollars (there is now on HDD size limitations very stupid because the storage size limits are questionable as they are like 500GB and 750GB but question is, how about GiB vs GB, but that is another story and difference is do you pay 7 euros or 10 euros) now on.
      Every device what is possible to use for recording (DVB, MP3-player, memory card, USB stick, empty CD/DVD, HDD/SDD etc) is taxed (it is already paid by company what sells product to customer, when they ship it to Finland).

      The copyright tax is collected by private corporations what are the copyright enforcers. The money is (supposed) shared to all artists who are listed to TEOSTO and TTVK depending their usage. Every radio, corporation, company etc pay montly or play amount for tax. Example if you have 1 man small company and you have radio in room where there are clients, you are forced to pay tax for it. If you have radio in your rest room what only you use, you don't need to pay as long the music isn't hearable from others.
      BUT, there have been cases where millions of euros of collected money, has not been paid to artists but for company itself and its shareholders and owners. Thats why those private corporations have nicknames like "TEOSTO-MAFIA" because they collect "protection money" in manner with their private investigators.

      But, the tax is good thing (the collector private corporations ways not). As it is the one what makes private copying LEGAL.

      With that tax, every citizen has right to record music from radio for own private use and make few copies of it for himself, family or closest friends.
      you can record movies or series from TV and do same sharing with same people.

      And the tax actually saves lots of money for people who just would know it. And that is the problem, as most do not know it!

    48. Re:Sensational! by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      The most that can really be said is the 600 euro fine (and the non-disclosure agreement) is absurd for what the alleged crime is.

      Well, I'd say that raiding someone's home in a matter that can be settled by a 600 Euro fine is patently absurd. In most civilized countries police force and actions must be commensurate and such a raid would not have been warranted. I'm surprised the search warrent got through in Sweden.

    49. Re:Sensational! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      It's those damned hippies, they keep saving the planet rather than letting the invisible hand strangle it.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    50. Re:Sensational! by Terrasque · · Score: 2

      You assume the goal is to deter downloading, rather than collecting boatloads of money. If people stop downloading, then not only will they not collect boatloads of money for free, but the organization no longer have a bogeyman to scare artists and politicians with. They also avoid public backlash.

      Keeping a lid on it is really a win-win situation for them.

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    51. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THE Supreme court? WHOSE Supreme court? There are more than a few...

    52. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean the cops don't pay for used games and music cds?

    53. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sueing into stone age is an american concept rather than finnish. In this case I'd probably try my best to make them attempt that as there's no way they can win more than lose in the process. They are already under a sizeable shitstorm and it'd grow by an order of magnitude if they were suing for NDA breach.

    54. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think Finland has juries. I don't think you can convict 9 year olds either. Both of that is not possible in Germany, at least; so I don't think it's possible in Finland.

    55. Re:Sensational! by KeensMustard · · Score: 1

      NOT COMMITTING A CRIME is considered a valid defence - in some countries...

    56. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, winning the wallet en censuring the mind...

    57. Re:Sensational! by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Not only is she 9 years old, but she never actually SUCCESSFULLY pirated anything. She never broke any law.

      Says who?

      Someone on the local side of these peoples internet connection joined the swarm for the file in question. Thats how the RIAA/MPAA got their IP address. This could not have been done without a torrent client. The file was, in fact, being downloaded by someone at their IP address. Maybe it never completed, but I find that kinda far fetched.

      The most likely scenario is that the girl downloaded some songs that she wanted, the father later found out about it and scolder her while deleting the files, and then he went out and legally purchased the music that she wanted in order to reinforce the "just ask us" mode. Everything else is just the father and the content owners telling each other to go fuck themselves in the best way they can (lies by one, and police involvement by the other)

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    58. Re:Sensational! by Rockoon · · Score: 0

      If your 5 year old kid still pees his pants, then you are probably a bad parent and perhaps the law should get involved.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    59. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe is not a country. You can't just keep saying whatever you want and find an European country with laws that support your theories.

    60. Re:Sensational! by raynet · · Score: 1

      You have one step too many, in Finland police doesn't need warrants.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    61. Re:Sensational! by war4peace · · Score: 1

      You got the story wrong. It implies that Winnie the Pooh is a pirate and a skilled criminal. To which I totally agree. Throw that dangerous, child-friendly badonkadonk in jail! And kill him with fire!

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    62. Re:Sensational! by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      First of all don't forget that the world is bigger than the US of A, and this story was set in that other 95% of the world. RIAA and MPAA have nothing to say there.

      Secondly also in the US the RIAA and MPAA are never involved directly in law suits, that is always the record company (who owns the copyrights involved). If RIAA or MPAA would start those suits themselves, they would be thrown out just like what happened to Righthaven's copyright suits.

    63. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? USA legislation and RIAA are unrelated to the case at hand.

    64. Re:Sensational! by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      2) sounds highly plausible, and is not really in contradiction to 9). Plenty of artists have free sample songs online; music from the artist in question is apparently available for free via Spotify even; so those police should shut up, refrain from making any public statements about the case, and just do their work. They're police, not a judge, and shouldn't behave like that.

      And finally I think this artist shouldn't come with that kind of half-way statements. Either she really doesn't want her fans to be sued and seriously complains to that TTVK, or she should shut up about it and silently endorse the action.

    65. Re:Sensational! by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      The child WAS primary suspect as it says so in warrant. The father of course is carrier in legal case as she is minor and lives at his father house. ( I have friend investigator from secret police who has first hand knowledge of this case).

      Wow, secret police involved even? It's getting better.

      According to other posts, copyright institution says it only tracks IP addresses, and sues based on that. How can the girl become suspect if she's not the ISP account holder? This contradicts.

      The girl is a minor, and at 9 yo probably pretty much immune from criminal prosecution, on grounds of being too young to make decisions and so. Does this also apply for minors in civil suits?

    66. Re:Sensational! by LordNightwalker · · Score: 1

      Aww man, you remember Alley Cat? :)

      --
      Install windows on my workstation? You crazy? Got any idea how much I paid for the damn thing?
    67. Re:Sensational! by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      I think we can read between the lines that the site she attempted to use was not Pirate Bay but a honey pot.

    68. Re:Sensational! by eriklou · · Score: 1

      The article on fark said that the kid had been trying to download some songs from PirateBay of a Finnish? singer she liked. The torrents never worked so she and her dad BOUGHT the album she was trying to download...

      http://gizmodo.com/5962765/the-police-raided-a-9+year+old-to-confiscate-her-winnie-the-pooh-laptop

    69. Re:Sensational! by Eraesr · · Score: 1

      The most that can really be said is the 600 euro fine (and the non-disclosure agreement) is absurd for what the alleged crime is.

      I find it strange that a house is being raided over a 600 euro fine. It probably costs 10 times that much money to raid the place and analyze the contents of whatever they have seized.

    70. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big Media, winning hearts and minds.

      I nominally don't care how batshit psychopath Big Media is - it's their lapdog governments that are the root cause of these problems. If this girl's neighbors can't come to her aid (and by that I mean armed with bullets) during a home invasion, then that is what's wrong with society.

    71. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electronic Frontier Finland's article
      http://www.effi.org/blog/2012-11-22-copyright-blackmail.html

      By the way, TTVK have announced that none on the money they receive from a lawsuit goes to artists but all of it are used to create more lawsuits.

    72. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story here is less about the targetting of a child, and more about a private enity being able to manipulate the local police into enforcing an extortion scheme: pay the protection money, or armed men will come and take your valuables. Yes, the article uses sensationalist reporting to get that point across, and rightly so! It's detestable that something like this can happen in a modern, civilized nation... and yet, chances are that these actions will be championed by people here in the US, oblivious to the long-term implications.

    73. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IANAL, but AFAIK "author rights" do not translate straight to "copy right". Amongst the inalienable author rights are the following, perfectly reasonable, ones:
      • The right for the author to be known as the author of the work (i.e. no plagiarizing)
      • The right for the author to ask the government to block spoofs and parodies that look too much like the author's own works (i.e. if customers could be confused)
      • The right for the author to control who is allowed to make copies of the work until I believe 70 years post mortem auctoris(that's similar to USA "copyright"), with some exceptions, but not as good for society as USA "fair use"
    74. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that the summary is relatively sensationalist and missing many actual "facts". I think the most telling "facts" are the comments made by Chisu once she found out what had happened. Of course publicly she has to side with the family, but assuming that this isn't an act and she actually feels this, why the CIAPC sending out these letters. Do artists have no power when signing contracts to negotiate that their works will not be the subject of letters requesting monetary compensation from families? I believe artists typically are in weaker positions when negotiating contracts, perhaps this is the real issue. Is this anticompetitive behaviour by the small number of record companies/labels?

    75. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about:
      " that's what I would tell the cops, too. If I was nine years old and (probably) below the age of criminal responsibility"

      You're a real 'tard, you know.

    76. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another example is in France where a painter gets paid every time his painting changes hands. Which is quite silly. If I create a painting and sell it - that should be the extent of my interest in it. In fact, if the buyer just burns it (because my painting skills totally suck), my interest is gone. But if that buyer then sells it again - I get another payday. Ludicrous, right?

    77. Re:Sensational! by lostfayth · · Score: 1

      Well, these things do happen...

      http://rt.com/usa/news/public-urination-warden-police-367/

      Though the officer in question was fired yesterday

    78. Re:Sensational! by wwalker · · Score: 1

      Let's forget for a second that a child was involved and that a cute cuddly laptop was taken from her. In what twisted fucked up world is it ok for the police (i.e. the government) to raid someone's HOME just because there is "evidence" that something was downloaded from somewhere on the Internet from an IP address that might or might not belong to a computer (IP spoofing anyone) that might or might not been in that home (WiFi router anyone)???

    79. Re:Sensational! by Velex · · Score: 1

      Yeah but just imagine how great the testosterone rush must feel!

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    80. Re:Sensational! by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 0

      Live in REALITY, Mr. Anonymous Coward... Your name says it all.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    81. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ??? is really: put it on eBay.

    82. Re:Sensational! by DeeEff · · Score: 1

      Not only is she 9 years old, but she never actually SUCCESSFULLY pirated anything. She never broke any law.

      Says who?

      Says TFA:

      Having failed in her quest to put enough money in her piggy bank to buy the latest album from local multi-platinum-selling songstress Chisu, in 2011 she turned to the Internet, first via Google and then The Pirate Bay.

      The girl’s father said the resulting downloads didn’t work so the following day they went to the store to buy music. Nevertheless, this week’s police visit shows that CIAPC mean business, no matter how young the targets or whether or not they also buy music.

      If the songs didn't work, it's probably a result of the actually not having downloaded the music, but a more malicious piece of data.

    83. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make a point of not buying music. The price always unreasonable. As I get older, the content is less desireable. I already have all the old music I want, and I find the excessive greed of the pre-recorded content industries to be repugnant and repulsive.

    84. Re:Sensational! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Bah, I gave up on paying for things when the paid-for software didn't work, and I pirated a crack that made it work. I got more value and better support from the pirates than I could get from the maker (and yes, I tried). Why should I pay money to people who refuse to support their product (and explicitly block returns for non-function as much or more than legally allowed), and sneak in rootkits whenever they think they can get away with it? I've gotten rootkitted more from pay software I properly paid for than all viruses warez and other "suspicious" software combined.

    85. Re:Sensational! by Zemran · · Score: 1

      I do not, nor will I ever, live in USSA. I value my freedoms and I could not live in such an oppressive country.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    86. Re:Sensational! by Garwulf · · Score: 2

      Sigh.

      Now, repeat after me: "Scandinavia is NOT the United States. The laws in Scandinavia are NOT the same as the laws in the United States. The original draft of the Constitution of the United States has NO relevance to the laws or legal principles of Scandinavia."

      And, speaking as somebody who is not an American, I really wish that American posters would quit citing their Constitution as the basis for copyright when the first actual copyright act in the English language was the Statute of Queen Anne, predating the U.S. Constitution by around 70 years. Seriously.

      --
      Robert B. Marks
      Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
    87. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This gets a +5 Insightful? Really?

      I am not here to teach you the basics of copyright or intellectual property law, but please spend some time looking into the concept of "assignment". One person can create something, and for a fee paid in cash or goods or services, transfer or assign their rights to another. There are also concepts known as "work for hire". That's where you get paid a salary for a creative job and the person who pays your wage gets the rights to the product of your work. Kind of like working for Microsoft, Apple, Samsung, Google or some other company as a coder or engineer and the company owns the copyright or patent on your work.

      Please, for the love of 200+ years of common law tradition and legal precedents and legal education, research the actual topic. The reality of how this works is a far, far cry from the idealized notion of how you think it works.

    88. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this new world of open exchange of information is great and all but has anyone considered the lawyers how will they make a living if they can't shake down 9 year olds for money.

    89. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it was his father who showed her how to get those songs, this is explained in his own blog.

    90. Re:Sensational! by Ezel · · Score: 1

      Sure you mean the Pirate Party and not the ANTI-piracy party in point 8?

      --
      Prosp long and liver.
    91. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the father's quoted statements to the contrary, you believe it was actually him they detected attempting to illegally download the Chisu songs?

    92. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we're at the point where it's sensationalistic to complain about raiding people's homes and confiscating property because of copyright violations. Copyright violations.

    93. Re:Sensational! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The NDA is so that you can't talk about the details. That way, the media owners can use it as a big, scary stick of unknown horrible consequences.

    94. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet they didn't even have a torrent client installed, and only got the ".torrent" link. Which hardly classifies as a "download" of the media itself. But of course someone without knowledge of the torrent system wouldn't know the reason for the "failure" so they couldn't transmit that fact to the writers of the article.

    95. Re:Sensational! by Dextrously · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Those damned Canadians, Mexicans, Brazilians, etc.. always citing U.S. constitution! Curse you Americans!

    96. Re:Sensational! by Garwulf · · Score: 1

      Sir, you have matched me wonderfully in snark - I salute you!

      --
      Robert B. Marks
      Author, Demonsbane in Diablo Archive
    97. Re:Sensational! by doccus · · Score: 1

      Re artists being prosecuted (or at the very least , harassed) by the record label for distributing their own music is more common than you might think.. The old style record contracts often stipulated that the label owns the rights, not the artists.. That's why it was such a big deal for MJ to buy back his own recordings... A lot of artists are making NO money,. even with an album that did well for them before, because they cannot reissue their albums, as the label owns it and doesn't see enough profit potential to bother..

    98. Re:Sensational! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I used to buy CDs or when itunes came out albums all the time at least one a month. Now I'm lucky if I buy one song a year.

      You hardly need to buy music .......there is such a variety of music freely available through Internet Radio
      With a few tricks you can even capture that music.

    99. Re:Sensational! by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      I guess obama should put some thought into his non answers

      heres a clue, bush sucked major cock, obama is continuing to suck as much cock

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    100. Re:Sensational! by ynp7 · · Score: 1

      First of all don't forget that the world is bigger than the US of A

      It is not! Apologize for your lies right now!

    101. Re:Sensational! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      A pretty sensationalist summary of what can only be charitably described as an article, which itself is long on innuendo but short on actual, you know, "facts".

      All that can really be said is that they raided the guys house and among other things took the childâ(TM)s laptop. There is no evidence in this story that the child was the primary suspect or even a suspect at all.

      The most that can really be said is the 600 euro fine (and the non-disclosure agreement) is absurd for what the alleged crime is.

      Why the non-disclosure?

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    102. Re:Sensational! by cavebison · · Score: 1

      The most that can really be said is the 600 euro fine [...]

      Not IMO. Letting a 9 year old play around on the internet is far worse than downloading a song. If she does it unsupervised, her parents might need a lesson in how to raise a kid in the 21st century.

      Not that any long term studies have been done yet, that I've seen, on the effects of all that stuff on a child's emotions / behaviour / attention span (apart from bullying), but I suspect it's not positive to be exposed to the entire internet like that at a young age. And there's already concern about the sexualisation of young people, without them having easy access to "what sex is" on the internet, without someone there to explain that it's all just a cynical money-making exercise aimed at men.

      I'm not even sure if minds that young should even be made aware of the extent of cynicism in the world. We all benefit from the "innocent" imaginations of kids, it makes the world a better place. By "innocence" I simply mean "bereft of cynicism". Pure belief in possibility. Life is a constant battle between belief and doubt - in oneself, in others, in life itself sometimes. There's time enough for them to experience that complexity, and learn from it, AFTER they've had time enough to find what their own, personal dreams are, unencumbered by doubt and expectation. That's what we treasure so much about "innocence".

    103. Re:Sensational! by Lando · · Score: 2

      Ummm no,

      From the wiki article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jackson_Games,_Inc._v._United_States_Secret_Service

      Steve Jackson Games was raided because Loyd Blankenship, who was writing the role playing game supplement GURPS Cyberpunk for the company, was a target of a crackdown. Blankenship, known in hacking circles as The Mentor, was a former member of the Legion of Doom hacker group. He had run a Bulletin board system (BBS) from his home called The Phoenix Project, which had helped distribute the popular underground ezine Phrack.

      As it was the raid was eventually deemed illegal and Scott Jackson Games was awarded compensation, but that really doesn't do much for a company that lost it's flagship product and had to start over from scratch. They had to lay off a bunch of people over the incident as well if I remember correctly.

      Nevertheless, it's a bit more complicated than an employee answering a forum question.

      --
      /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    104. Re:Sensational! by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      You missed your target there. The NDA was presented by the CIAPC as part of a settlement offer to avoid them reporting the issue to the authorities in the first place. That doesn't make the NDA any better, but the authorities weren't insisting on any secrecy once the prosecution started.

      Virg

  2. Dear CIAPC by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 5, Insightful

    FUCK YOU.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Dear CIAPC by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That's true. They wouldn't bother trying to get the state police involved, they'd just send their private thugs to your house and take anything that they liked the look of. if you don't like it, then make sure you hire better-armed security than them. And pay them more than they'd get for just stepping aside...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Dear CIAPC by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      No but you could have a warlord busting into the house, taking the goodies, killing the dad and taking the little girl for a sex slave.

      Parts of Somalia have anarchy right now. Go now, run to your paradise!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  3. Get it right. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its a home invasion, not a raid.. Stop sugar coating police activity.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Get it right. by fredprado · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not there. In Finland it is not a criminal offence and the police clearly ignored the law and did what their owners (the corporations) wanted them to do, thus the need for the non-disclosure agreement. Now it remains to be seen if the courts will follow the law or blatantly ignore it and just do as they want like in the Piratebay trial in Sweden.

    2. Re:Get it right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not stealing, jackass.

    3. Re:Get it right. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Well, I logged in to say that if a warrant was obtained, then the action was as legal as enforcing anti-racism laws. But, since the article is completely secondhand information from "Torrentfreak" and contains no link to the source, I can't say.

      And the whole "home invasion" thing stinks of an American right-wing nutbag sitting at home polishing his guns dreaming of the day he opens fire on police. You might want to change your memes to get a more sympathetic audience.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Get it right. by Drishmung · · Score: 4, Funny
      Agree!

      Oh, you are referring to the theft of the laptop, aren't you?

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    5. Re:Get it right. by dnaumov · · Score: 2

      Except, of course, that "tekijänoikeusrikos" which is what the child is suspected of is most definately a crime.

      "Rikos" = crime in finnish language.

    6. Re:Get it right. by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Then put the musical notes back where you found them. And the chords, too. All of them.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    7. Re:Get it right. by Albanach · · Score: 1

      Not there. In Finland it is not a criminal offence and the police clearly ignored the law

      That's strange, this academic paper suggests otherwise.

      The Wikipedia page on Finland's 2005 amendment to the Copyright Act and Penal Code also says this was made a crime some seven years ago, bringing Finland into line with the EU copyright directive.

      Do you have a source for your claim?

    8. Re:Get it right. by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      It's actually "tekijänoikeusrikkomus," ie. breach of copyright. It does not in any way or form imply criminality.

    9. Re:Get it right. by fredprado · · Score: 1
      From your own link.

      Downloading for personal use won't be punished, but it may lead to claims for damages, if the copier knows or should have known that the source is illegal.

      As in most places in the world, downloading is not a crime.

    10. Re:Get it right. by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Unauthorized file sharing can be punished as a crime, even though it wouldn't be done for profit.
      Downloading illegal copies on the Internet will be prohibited. Downloading for personal use won't be punished

      These are taken from your own link and clearly state that sharing is a crime, but downloading isn't.

    11. Re:Get it right. by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Actually home invasion makes me think of this:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faML0QvVb2A

      You might want to see how far back the phrase goes before trying to turn it into a political bunch of nonsense.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    12. Re:Get it right. by fredprado · · Score: 1
      And from the paper you linked:

      Unlawfulness and fault concepts required by Finnish Copyright Act and by the Criminal Code turn out being complicated concepts, especially in the network environment. For copyright crime, certain kind of “professionalism” and wilfulness as well a certain wide scope of activity are required. For copyright offence, gross negligence suffices. Instead for tort liability unlawfulness without subjective criteria can lead to high damages for copyright infringement

      Therefore you have provided yourself the sources for my claim. Next time I recommend you take the time to read the material you are linking before you post links to it.

    13. Re:Get it right. by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative

      As in most places in the world, downloading is not a crime.

      A lot of file sharing software is designed to upload simultaneously with the download. BitTorrent would be a popular example.

    14. Re:Get it right. by Albanach · · Score: 1

      These are taken from your own link and clearly state that sharing is a crime, but downloading isn't.

      So look at the TorrentFreak article that was the source for the one in the intro:

      One such request for cash landed on the doorstep of an Internet account holder in Finland during the spring. Known locally as TTVK, Finnish anti-piracy group CIAPC sent the man a letter informing him that his account had been traced back to an incidence of online file-sharing.

      It was file-sharing that was being investigated, not simple downloading.

    15. Re:Get it right. by Gaygirlie · · Score: 2

      As in most places in the world, downloading is not a crime.

      A lot of file sharing software is designed to upload simultaneously with the download. BitTorrent would be a popular example.

      Indeed, and that is the issue in almost all these cases: downloading in and of itself isn't the criminal part, it's the uploading. There are plenty of ways of downloading stuff even without uploading, though, including on BitTorrent.

    16. Re:Get it right. by Albanach · · Score: 1

      Your quote says nothing about the file-sharing that was alleged to have taken place not being potentially criminal and therefore worthy of police investigation.

      File-sharing is what is alleged to have taken place (read the source article form Torrent Freak). File sharing is punishable as a crime in Finland (and across the EU) and therefore is investigated by the police.

    17. Re:Get it right. by petman · · Score: 1

      As opposed to stealing what belongs to me?

    18. Re:Get it right. by fredprado · · Score: 1
      Oh it says exactly that:

      For copyright crime, certain kind of “professionalism” and willfulness as well a certain wide scope of activity are required.

      Read it again and again until it sinks, you will eventually get the meaning. Unless of course you are arguing that the 9 year old girl is the head of a professional illegal distribution network. Maybe the Chinese or the Russian mafia?

    19. Re:Get it right. by fredprado · · Score: 2

      The difference is that in many countries downloading isn't even a civil liability (in Finland it is but the damages paid are relatively low). So you are at risk of being sued only when you upload in these countries. In most sane places in the world, and even insane places like US, uploading this way is a civil liability not a criminal offence. Actually I am not aware of a single country in the world where uploading a file in a p2p program at home has been judged by any court as a criminal offence (at least yet).

      For it to be a crime there is usually the need of money being involved, or at least a professional distribution scheme found.

    20. Re:Get it right. by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      Money talks. The struggles surrounding the legal process of stopping piracy is a classic example, and proof, that people will only be policed as much as they allow themselves to. So money and survival comes in to play. "I'll pay you to do something wrong," says the business men. "Ok, I know it's wrong, but I have a family to feed," says the police. "I'll ignore this as long as I can, so long as it doesn't hurt me", says the proletariat.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    21. Re:Get it right. by Albanach · · Score: 1

      Actually I am not aware of a single country in the world where uploading a file in a p2p program at home has been judged by any court as a criminal offence (at least yet).

      First US convictions for illegal file sharing. These are felony convictions.

      Google shows other criminal convictions overseas.

    22. Re:Get it right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's a protection racket. The non-disclosure shows that not only do they know that, but they actively want to hide that fact!

      Simple organized crime. Simple "it's a shame if something happened to your daughter".

      Machineguns and flamethrowers! That's what those bastards deserve! Right in their fuckin' faces!

    23. Re:Get it right. by Albanach · · Score: 1

      Actually that's not a good link, sorry. It looks like they were doing more than simple sharing. I can't find a US case of criminal conviction for plain file sharing, though that might be because the civil penalties are so huge, and the burden is lower for the record companies to prevail.

      Cases do exist overseas. There are cases in the UK, and this BBC article suggests Japan has treated it as a criminal offense for a couple of years, but will now start invoking penalties: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19767970

    24. Re:Get it right. by Lisias · · Score: 2

      He was talking to the Police!

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    25. Re:Get it right. by fredprado · · Score: 1

      As I said. I haven't seen a single case of conviction based solely on domestic upload. Apparently by your link Japan legislators are trying to force it to happen (which is being strongly opposed by public opinion there), but nobody has been convicted yet. I am almost cheering for someone to be convicted there because then hell will break loose, as it will probably happen in Finland because of this very case.

      Talking about Finland, which is the place we were talking about here in the first place, there you cannot throw criminal charges against someone for domestic download or upload, as it is so well explained in the very paper you posted.

    26. Re:Get it right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know most American right-wing nutjobs are the ones that support the police, right? You're looking for the liberals who are dreaming of getting rid of the police by any means necessary.

    27. Re:Get it right. by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      From your own link.

      Downloading for personal use won't be punished, but it may lead to claims for damages, if the copier knows or should have known that the source is illegal.

      As in most places in the world, downloading is not a crime.

      Has it ever occurred to you that assuming a translation of Finnish law in English is perfectly 100% accurate, and NONE of Finland's legal terms could possibly have different implications then their American English equivalent, is pretty silly?

      For example, as an American I'd consider a fine a punishment no matter who got the cash. But apparently in Finnish legal thought fines are only punishments if they go to the government.

      Finland is a sovereign state. They can set up their legal system however they want. In this case it clearly allows the police to go to someone's house and take their computers as part of an investigation into illegal downloading of songs because they just did that shit. No, as a non-Finnish speaker, I have no idea if that means illegal downloading's also officially criminal behavior because I don't know how to say "criminal behavior" in Finnish. But I do know that if Cleveland PD had that power I'd consider illegal downloading a very bad crime.

    28. Re:Get it right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But apparently in Finnish legal thought fines are only punishments if they go to the government.

      It then wasn't a fine. The amount is not based on the law which probably explains the NDA. The amount is simply part of a private contract between the person, or representative(TTVK, or CIAPC) of the person holding the rights to the work, and the person who violated against those rights. No wonder the father ignored the letter as such letters demanding arbitrary payments should always be considered frauds.

      No, as a non-Finnish speaker, I have no idea if that means illegal downloading's also officially criminal behavior because I don't know how to say "criminal behavior" in Finnish.

      Behaviour is "criminal" only if it has been described in the criminal law as such, and the behaviour fits the description as it can be understood using the ordinary significance (common language), the common legal-technical significance or the formal legal significance of the words in the section of the law.

    29. Re:Get it right. by dnaumov · · Score: 2

      "tekijänoikeusrikkomus" and "tekijänoikeusrikos" are 2 different things and the child is suspected of the latter.

    30. Re:Get it right. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      And apparently I am the "criminal" here.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    31. Re:Get it right. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Nope, they have a long, long history of being anti-government. Look up Randy Weaver or the Branch Davidians for recent examples.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    32. Re:Get it right. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Unless of course you are arguing that the 9 year old girl is the head of a professional illegal distribution network.

      She doesn't have to head it up, merely contribute in a non-trivial manner. There are some pretty scary organisations out there!
      http://www.girlguiding.org.uk/brownies/index.html

    33. Re:Get it right. by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Well in this thread alone (from what I read so far) you have already hurt 14 puppies, so maybe you are ;)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    34. Re:Get it right. by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Harmed, not hurt. Because not being cuddled while I type is harm, isn't it? But you can see for yourself how I mistreat my dogs...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    35. Re:Get it right. by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Awwww the humanity, the horrible horrible harm that those dogs are doing to eachother, give them a cuddle for me :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  4. Scandinavia, the great country! by hyfe · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Seriously, this so-called article doesn't even state which country it happended in.. nor does any of the links in it.

    I live in Norway, in this certainly hasn't hit the news here.. and if it did, you can be damn sure there would be hell to pay for somebody. Our authorities are so fucking nice that even after Breivik blew up our government headquarters and shot around 80 kids.. one by one.. we still hadn't scrambled the military or even gotten choppers in the air. I honestly suspect if our police (who don't have guns) tried to take a 9 year old girls laptop they would comply when she kicked them and told them go away :)

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    1. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by LucidBeast · · Score: 3, Informative

      Happened in Finland

    2. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by hyfe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I honestly suspect if our police (who don't have guns) tried to take a 9 year old girls laptop they would comply when she kicked them and told them go away :)

      Oh, and I wouldn't have it any other way.. damn proud of it in fact.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    3. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was Finland.

    4. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Pyrus.mg · · Score: 2

      Honestly, I don't know why any article with a source link at the bottom of it ends up in slashdot summary.

    5. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by maroberts · · Score: 1

      Our authorities are so fucking nice that even after Breivik blew up our government headquarters and shot around 80 kids.. one by one.. we still hadn't scrambled the military or even gotten choppers in the air. I honestly suspect if our police (who don't have guns) tried to take a 9 year old girls laptop they would comply when she kicked them and told them go away :)

      I couldn't decide whether your comment was +1 Funny, +1 Insightful or +1 Tragic

      --

      Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
      Karma: Chameleon

    6. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by someones · · Score: 1

      just read the article, there are at least links to response articles.
      Therefore it holds that the story was not made up by torrentfreak.

    7. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Happened in Finland

      Which isn't part of Scandinavia.

    8. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Kjella · · Score: 2

      It was Finland, not that Finland is actually part of Scandinavia or anything... it's one of the Nordic countries yes, but Scandinavia means Norway, Sweden and Denmark. And it makes even less sense when you're talking about a legal action since we're entirely separate jurisdictions, it's like saying a North American was arrested without specifying under US, Canadian or Mexican law. The only real piece of news here is that the police has got nothing better to do than exercise warrants because a 9yo clicked some links on TPB. I'd sooner send them out to issue parking tickets if they have that much spare time...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I don't know why any article with a source link at the bottom of it ends up in slashdot summary.

      What's wrong with Torrentfreak?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    10. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by del_diablo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now... now... Scandinavia is several terms:
      The core: Norway, Sweden and Denmark
      The extended: +Finland, +Iceland.
      Finland may or may not be a part of Scandinavia depending on who you are talking to.

    11. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Oh, so that's why Finns get so pissy about those "Welcome to the Capital of Scandinavia!" signs at the Stockholm airport...

      Thanks, AC!

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    12. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 1

      I think he was complaining that slashdot simply liked to a pseudo-summary instead of the original article.

      He was wishing they DID link to TorrentFreak.

    13. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Denmark--which isn't even on the Scandinavian Peninsula--is part of Scandinavia, then why is Finland--which *is* on that peninsula--not part of it?

    14. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Read your history.

      Finland magickally ceased being part of Scandinavia in 1809.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    15. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of the Jews.

    16. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Google Scandinavia. The map includes Finland. Estonia is almost never included in the definition of Scandinavia, but it's President gave a speech declaring it to be in the region. Scandinavia is a political and cultural region, not a political one, so basically anyone who agrees with stereotypically Scandinavian cultural and political ideas claims to be Scandinavian. You might not agree with Finland's inclusion in the region, but you have to agree that plenty of people put it there.

      And you really should be used to being conflated with other countries in summary of news articles. This happens to small countries all the time. No story about Guatemala is going to leave out the phrase "small Central American country." The problem here is that slashdot chose to link to a relatively uninformative summary, and not the original torrentfreak article.

    17. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 4, Informative

      The "article," which is not really an article but more of a brief opinion blurb that paraphrases an article, says Scandinavia. However, this happened in Finland, which is NOT Scandinavian no matter how many people wrongly think so. The FInnish language does not share a common origin with Scandinavian languages, and it has been quite a long time since FInland was ruled by Sweden, with Russian rule between that and Finnish independence. Sure, it is near Scandinavia, and the Sami have long lived throughout the region and across modern borders, but Finland has much less in common with Sweden, Norway, and Denmark than those three countries and populations share with each other.

      Anyway, the link and quote should have referred to the original story, which was a bit more detailed and accurate.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    18. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by emj · · Score: 1

      It's a bit like "england", you know those isles in the north sea.

    19. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by upside · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're right. Linguistically Finnish is totally unrelated, for example Swedish and Russian are closer to each other than Finnish is to either of them. However, Finland shares the same mix of politics, economics, culture and religion with other Nordic countries, which is distinct from other parts of Europe and the world.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    20. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and Finland isn't even part of Scandinavia...

    21. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you are in the USA, there typically is "USA" and "World".
      It's hard to know or remember that countries such as Scandinavia, Europe and Africa are divided into even smaller countries.

    22. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finland, which is NOT Scandinavian no matter how many people wrongly think so

      Whoa, next you will tell me that I can't call the UK "England," the Netherlands "Holland," the US "America" or the EU "Europe."

      One of the principal meanings of Scandinavia in US English is "the Nordic Countries." The word has several other meanings, which are reserved for professional jargon (linguistics: "Iceland, Faroe Islands, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Aland, parts of Greenland and Finland;" geography: "Sweden and Norway").

    23. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, Finland shares the same mix of politics, economics, culture and religion with other Nordic countries, which is distinct from other parts of Europe and the world.

      Which is why it is considered a Nordic country, not a Scandinavian one.

    24. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Scandinavia is a geographical area, a peninsula. I'd say Northern Finland is a part of Scandinavia in this sense. I'm not sure if Denmark should be included at all -- it's not exactly a part of the same peninsula, although they share a geological history.

      Now, there's a completely different matter of Nordic Countries, which comprises Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Iceland. Foreigners often use Scandinavia as a synonym for Nordic Countries, a mistake that's easy to make.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    25. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      The UK is a group of countries that includes England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland. If you want to display your ignorance of geography and history you can call the UK and England the "same thing", but I advise against doing so out loud in a Scottish pub.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    26. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no official definition of the term Scandinavia. The term sometimes includes Finland and sometime don't depending on who you ask.
      Maybe it would have been better to say Nordic instead as that term always include Finland but it's not wrong use Scandinavia in this context.

    27. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope nobody from Wales saw what you wrote.

    28. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, by that logic, should we exclude northern parts of Sweden from Scandinavia?-)

      But yeah, the word people are looking for is Nordics. It's not like there aren't metrics where any of Sweden, Norway or Denmark would stand out as the far out batshit crazy country with Finland blending with the rest.

    29. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      even after Breivik blew up our government headquarters and shot around 80 kids.. one by one.. we still hadn't scrambled the military or even gotten choppers in the air.

      Well, yes. It's a testament to the people of Norway that this didn't lead to a bout of collective insanity, unlike in the UK.

      our police (who don't have guns)

      And now we in the UK have heavily armed police wandering arouns busy stations in london. What are they going to do, start firing their semi automatic carbines into the rush hour crowd if something bad happens?

      Apparently they are there to stop a Mumbai style attack even though it happened successfully in Mumbai where the police are already armed.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    30. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      There is the Scandinavian Peninsula, which is what you are referring to, but that is a purely geographical term and is distinct from Scandinavia proper.

      The cultural/linguistic region Scandinavia consists of Norway, Sweden and Denmark, because we share common culture, history, politics and linguistic roots. If you know even the slightest bit of history, disregarding Denmark as part of Scandinavia is quite ignorant.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    31. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      The cultural/linguistic region Scandinavia consists of Norway, Sweden and Denmark, because we share common culture, history, politics and linguistic roots. If you know even the slightest bit of history, disregarding Denmark as part of Scandinavia is quite ignorant.

      OK, I was disregarding Denmark purely on a geographical basis, I do know my history (though from a twisted Finno-Ugric perspective ;).

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    32. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guilt by association.

    33. Re:Scandinavia, the great country! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Wait, there are real people in Wales?

  5. Non-disclosure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the suspect part. Why would they want the father to sign a non-disclosure agreement? How is fining the man a deterrent to others if they never hear about it?

    These are rhetorical questions of course, as its obvious why.

    1. Re:Non-disclosure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Rhetorical, hell. Why is it legal to demand a non-disclosure agreement for a fine? And even if it's not an enforceable agreement ('can't sign your rights away'), it still has to be illegal to demand such a thing. Otherwise your laws have a wide-open road for extortion.

      And is it even a "fine"? These guys are not a government body as far as I can tell from their site; they'd surely trumpet that if they were. Nor is the father a member of some group agreement with them, which'd be the only other way to levy a fine.

      Whole lot of WTF? with this one. Is there an alternative translation perhaps?

    2. Re:Non-disclosure? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      This is the suspect part. Why would they want the father to sign a non-disclosure agreement? How is fining the man a deterrent to others if they never hear about it?

      Ass-covering. Legal ass-covering and greed, plain and simple. Always question authority, always know your rights, and never voluntarily give them up, especially if someone tries to pressure you to do so.

      These are rhetorical questions of course, as its obvious why.

      Yep. Their revenue enforcement model is shaky at best, and they know it, so they need to induce fear and rely on obfuscation and empty threats as much as possible. Too bad they are pretty good bullshitters and aren't called on it frequently enough.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    3. Re:Non-disclosure? by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

      Remember this isn't America. Just because we don't have a system where crime victims can say "pay up, or I'll testify;" that does not imply that other countries can't have that system. They wouldn't have to apply that system to all crimes (for example, it would probably be a bad idea in rape cases -- lots of chances for rich serial rapists to get away with it, and gold-diggers to legally blackmail people), but they could do it. It's their country, so they get to make the rules.

      Apparently in Finland what's expected is that when a rightholder finds a violation he asks the violator to make it right by paying a penalty and agreeing not go to the media, because he'd look bad (Chisu, the artist in question, is not happy about this. At all.). If the violator doesn't agree to the deal the police do an investigation, which can involve taking a nine-year-old's Winnie the Pooh laptop. The next step is unclear because it hasn't happened yet.

      BTW, don't get hung-up on the specific word "fine." In English a Fine is something you pay the government to deter you from breaking the law, but if Finnish law recognizes a class of crimes where the police and criminal courts collect penalties on behalf of private citizens they could easily translate the word for those penalties as "fine," for lack of a better alternative.

  6. Downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when are they going after people for downloading? Uploaders are usually the ones who get hit.

    1. Re:Downloading by viperidaenz · · Score: 0

      If you download a torrent, you're also uploading.

      - A friendly message from the country with the Skynet Act

    2. Re:Downloading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you download somethling large (say 12GB of data) at max speed but upload at only 0.1 Kb/s the exchange is nowhere near proportionate. Yes, it's a douche thing to do, but you can't blame people for being paranoid. You would probably upload less than 75 Mb by the time the download is finished, depending on your download speed. The little bit you actually distribute is practically useless by itself. It's kind of like only sharing a few seconds of a song or movie instead of the whole thing.

    3. Re:Downloading by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that makes it only copyright infringement, instead of copyright infringement. Oh wait...

      ps: you can't claim "fair use" when that use is the illegal distribution of copyrighted materials.

  7. I Imagine by wisnoskij · · Score: 0

    A significant proportion of all homes raided contain young children and in the case of cyber crimes the kids computer would likely get confiscated as well.

    Regardless on how you feel about piracy, criminals do not get a free pass simply because they have children.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    1. Re:I Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that copyright infringement is a civil matter unless (IIRC) it's for a huge amount of offenses or if it's done for profit. You really think the goddamn media companies wouldn't hesitate to throw downloaders in jail if they could?

    2. Re:I Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is, sharing doesn't make you a fucking criminal.

    3. Re:I Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless on how you feel about piracy, criminals do not get a free pass simply because they have children.

      but in this case the child had a "Winnie the Pooh" laptop!

    4. Re:I Imagine by Nyder · · Score: 2

      A significant proportion of all homes raided contain young children and in the case of cyber crimes the kids computer would likely get confiscated as well.

      Regardless on how you feel about piracy, criminals do not get a free pass simply because they have children.

      Yes, you are right. Put the criminal (in this case, a 9 year old girl) in jail because she is a threat to the profits of corporations.

      Are you stupid or just a dick?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    5. Re:I Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless on how you feel about piracy, criminals do not get a free pass simply because they are children.

      Fixed that for you.

      Oh won't something think of the children! Oh wait they apparently were......

    6. Re:I Imagine by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      The summery specifically said that the "criminal" was the father.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  8. Slashdot and my real life meet for the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This morning my girlfriend told me about her friend whose daughter's laptop was seized after they demanded a 600 euro fine.

    Also, Finland is not Scandinavia.

  9. Direct link by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 5, Informative

    The "article" mostly quotes from Torrent Freak. Here's the longer source:

    http://torrentfreak.com/police-raid-9-year-old-pirate-bay-girl-confiscate-winnie-the-pooh-laptop-121122/

    1. Re:Direct link by Mitreya · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Thank you for the link
      It's the tidbits like this that make me feel warm and fuzzy about copyright and police:

      "It would have been easier for all concerned if you had paid the compensation," the police advised

      Any other law violation you either get searched/charged or let off the hook.
      How about next time you are charged with (actual) theft, someone calls you first and offers to pay 600 euros to avoid the hassle? Why is this a valid option for copyright violation accusations?

    2. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why do you doubt that a 9 year old is capable of a few simple mouse gestures and clicks? I was typing in BASIC programs into my Vic-20 when I was 6, I'm pretty sure kids these days can manage this just fine.

    3. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, by herself, the 9-year old installed a torrent application and navigated to Pirate Bay... Yes, sure she did.

      Sure, why not? Have you ever actually met a 9-year-old? Kids can be damn clever, especially when it comes to getting technology to provide entertainment.

    4. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you were doing as a nine-year old, but back in my day we were all installing Napster, and our parents didn't know shit.

    5. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having failed in her quest to put enough money in her piggy bank to buy the latest album from local multi-platinum-selling songstress Chisu, in 2011 she turned to the Internet, first via Google and then The Pirate Bay.

      So, by herself, the 9-year old installed a torrent application and navigated to Pirate Bay... Yes, sure she did.

      Again, why sensationalize the story by pitting the Storm Troopers against a 9-year old, when common sense says that's not what happened?

      Opera has a built-in torrent application and the kid has her own laptop... you think she's been using it as a pillow? At that age I was copying and playing cracked C64 games with little clue of the english language so I'm pretty sure she'd manage google and a few clicks to get started.

    6. Re:Direct link by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 2

      You do NOT know how smart 9-year-old girls really are. If you were a parent, or a 9-year-old boy or girl, you would know the correct answer: 9-year-old girls are geniuses with tech. Seriously, what's so hard about opening transmission? It comes preinstalled on Linux distributions. Open up firefox, hit a magnet link, and it asks "do you want to open this link with 'transmission'?" It also gives you the option of switching the default torrent app to Ktorrent.
      ;>P
      It's so fvkcing easy to click on links in the browser and get a torrent download started, even an ADULT could do it. Any child can do it without a problem. The trick is sometimes finding the torrent or magnet link in the first place.

    7. Re:Direct link by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Why do you doubt that a 9 year old is capable of a few simple mouse gestures and clicks? I was typing in BASIC programs into my Vic-20 when I was 6, I'm pretty sure kids these days can manage this just fine.

      Sure, she could be clever or good with computers, but upon preponderance of the evidence I'm not entirely convinced. I could be wrong, but I think there might be a negative correlation between using Winnie the Pooh laptops and technical skills.

    8. Re:Direct link by Ost99 · · Score: 1

      The original article quotes the father saying the download failed; so she might have downloaded a torrent file with no client to open it with.

      --
      ---- Sig. gone.
    9. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Installing a torrent client and finding tpb through google is entirely possible for almost any 9 year old kid.
      Back in the Amiga days the cool 9-year olds used BBS's to pirate games.

      My 2-year old kid navigates Netflix by her self, and I've found my 7 year old kid trying to upload a video she made with her camera to youtube. I expect an OS (re)install to be feasible for many computer interested 9 year olds.

    10. Re:Direct link by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 1

      Hahaha! I didn't note the "winnie the pooh" laptop part. It only says that they confiscated a pooh laptop. There's no explicit statement that the downloading occurred on the pooh-bear laptop. It's easy enough to download a torrent via firefox on a linux distro which could have been on a family computer. And since linux runs on so much hardware, i betcha "pooh-bear" could have been running linux, but yeah I've gotta agree with you here. It's not likely that it happened on the pooh laptop.

    11. Re:Direct link by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      There's no explicit statement that the downloading occurred on the pooh-bear laptop.

      If not on the pooh laptop, than daddy did it, NOT the 9-year old.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    12. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, I've never met a 9-year old. In fact, I was never 9 years old myself. Went straight from 8 to 10 and skipped the whole 9 year old phase.

    13. Re:Direct link by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Any other law violation you either get searched/charged or let off the hook.
      How about next time you are charged with (actual) theft, someone calls you first and offers to pay 600 euros to avoid the hassle? Why is this a valid option for copyright violation accusations?

      Unfortunately, "any other law" doesn't apply here. This is a civil violation, not a criminal one. Its not theft, it's copyright violation. It's extortion to demand money not to turn someone in for a criminal violation, but in civil matters you are free to offer a deal in exchange for not pressing charges. In criminal cases, the D.A. is the one pressing the charges, and in civil cases it's the plaintiff's lawyer, which is why they have the option.

      The plaintiffs aren't the problem here. The police aren't the problem either. The plaintiffs are simply taking advantage of the law as written for their own benefit, and the police are just playing along by the rules as required. It's the Bad Law that's to blame. You can't blame companies and greedy people for being greedy, it's what they DO. You can't blame the police for enforcing the law, it's also what they DO. The only one to blame is your legislator, who created the Bad Law, whom you voted in. That means blame yourself, and work to get the laws changed.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    14. Re:Direct link by Delarth799 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because a lot of the time they don't have much if any actual evidence to stand on so the threaten people with letters and most just pay to avoid further hassle. Then they are forced to sign a non-disclosure agreement which most likely has a clause about not talking about the settlement thus allowing everything to be swept under the rug.

    15. Re:Direct link by jamesh · · Score: 2

      You do NOT know how smart 9-year-old girls really are. If you were a parent, or a 9-year-old boy or girl, you would know the correct answer: 9-year-old girls are geniuses with tech. Seriously, what's so hard about opening transmission? It comes preinstalled on Linux distributions. Open up firefox, hit a magnet link, and it asks "do you want to open this link with 'transmission'?" It also gives you the option of switching the default torrent app to Ktorrent. ;>P

      It's so fvkcing easy to click on links in the browser and get a torrent download started, even an ADULT could do it. Any child can do it without a problem. The trick is sometimes finding the torrent or magnet link in the first place.

      She can't be that smart... she got caught didn't she? :)

      Also, you'll likely find kids with parents who can't or won't help them on the computer can be a bit better at it too. My kids always want to take the easy way out and get dad to do it for them, but it's amazing what they can do when they really want something done and you won't help them right now.

    16. Re:Direct link by rtb61 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course you can blame them, the whole idea that it is OK to bend laws so far out of shape that they only serve they psychopathically greedy is a OK, is insane, as insane as those douche who exploit the law. Blame the crap out of the, avoid the products, find the actual individuals involved and make their lives a misery just like they want to do to the rest of us. "NAME AND SHAME".

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    17. Re:Direct link by sjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see no reason at all that it is clearly the dad that attempted the download. What makes you think a 9 year old is incapable of installing a torrent application and clicking on a link? If anything, it's usually the kids that help mom and dad with things like that.

      Do you have some additional information that actually suggests that the dad did it?

    18. Re:Direct link by grcumb · · Score: 4, Funny

      She can't be that smart... she got caught didn't she? :)

      This time. The test will be to measure what havoc she wreaks on her tormentors once she gets her new My Little Pony rig and goes all Princess Digital on their asses.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    19. Re:Direct link by grcumb · · Score: 5, Funny

      She can't be that smart... she got caught didn't she? :)

      This time. The test will be to measure what havoc she wreaks on her tormentors once she gets her new My Little Pony rig and goes all Princess Digital on their asses.

      Well... My Little Pwnie, actually....

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    20. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't blame companies and greedy people for being greedy, it's what they DO. You can't blame the police for enforcing the law, it's also what they DO. The only one to blame is your legislator, who created the Bad Law, whom you voted in. That means blame yourself, and work to get the laws changed.

      If greedy people are allowed to be greedy, am I not allowed to blame them? Why not? Is it prohibited somehow?

    21. Re:Direct link by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is a civil violation, not a criminal one. ... It's extortion to demand money not to turn someone in for a criminal violation, but in civil matters you are free to offer a deal in exchange for not pressing charges. ... You can't blame the police for enforcing the law, it's also what they DO.

      Sorry, you are not making sense.

      Yes, you can offer a deal in civil violation cases, but you certainly do not get to call in police to back you up if the opponent turns down the deal.

      Please decide -- either it's a criminal violation (then the police are enforcing the law and 600 euro get-out-of -jail bribe is ridiculous) or it is a civil violation (and in that case what "law" is police enforcing, exactly?). I thought it was criminal, since police raided their house.

    22. Re:Direct link by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you think a 9 year old can't manage it, I suggest that it is you who needs to join us here in the real world.

    23. Re:Direct link by v1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can offer a deal in civil violation cases, but you certainly do not get to call in police to back you up if the opponent turns down the deal.

      Actually that's exactly how it works. You don't call the police directly like you're reporting robbery though. Your lawyers see a judge and file charges and obtain a warrant. THEN the police get involved and go to the defendant and gather evidence. Those extra steps are required, in theory, to make sure that a crime is likely taking place before the police get involved. At some point a judge approved this raid before it happened. The plaintiff presented evidence to support their claim, had their i's dotted and t's crossed, got the warrant, and in came the cops. That's sometimes how civil cases go.

      The plaintiff can contact you and see if you want to make a deal. They can offer any legal terms, and you can accept or decline. If you accept, you're likely going to be signing a deal, that says they get xxx and they also promise not to press charges. They don't have to offer you a deal either. They don't have to notify you unless the law states some requirement.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    24. Re:Direct link by grcumb · · Score: 2

      Well... My Little Pwnie, actually....

      To whomever modded this '-1, Troll':

      Dude, get a grip. I was replying to myself, for fuck's sake. 8^)

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    25. Re:Direct link by Mitreya · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually that's exactly how it works. You don't call the police directly like you're reporting robbery though. Your lawyers see a judge and file charges and obtain a warrant. THEN the police get involved and go to the defendant and gather evidence.

      I am not a lawyer, and this is a different country we are talking about. But I was under the impression that you have to actually sue the opposing party in civil court _first_. Then warrant may be given to perform discovery of whatever judge allows you to discover

      Otherwise where exactly would this evidence go to? Some evidence is sent directly to the judge (and there is no judge).

      It would be pretty hilarious if the police can just take the girl's laptop directly to the (civilly) suing party. Do they (CIAPC) have to give the laptop back? How long do they have to preform discovery? Does police perform their own forensic analysis during a civil lawsuit?

    26. Re:Direct link by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Why? The dad could have bought the laptop for her and she does not really care whether the laptop is Winnie the Pooh branded or not.

      Also, maybe she likes Winnie and asked her dad to buy the laptop branded as such, but this does not say anything about her technical skills. If my dad offered to buy me a laptop when I was 10 (and had a PC appropriate for my username) I probably would have asked for it to be branded with one of my favorite cartoons too, that does not mean that I could not install Windows on my own (and for extra challenge, the English classes just started at school, so I pretty much couldn't understand most of what was written by the setup).

      Obviously the difference between when I was a kid and now is that kids get access to computers earlier than I did because computers are much cheaper now.. So, it is quite possible that she could have downloaded the torrent client and started the download herself (and maybe that's why the download failed?), especially if there are sites in her native language that explain how to do it.

    27. Re:Direct link by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can offer a deal in civil violation cases, but you certainly do not get to call in police to back you up if the opponent turns down the deal. Please decide -- either it's a criminal violation (then the police are enforcing the law and 600 euro get-out-of -jail bribe is ridiculous) or it is a civil violation (and in that case what "law" is police enforcing, exactly?).

      This big distinction between civil code and criminal law is an artifact of the common law system, which is not used that much outside the US. Here in Norway everything is a law, but a law typically has a liability side and a criminal side with different standards and rules. For example any damage to my property I'd have to file as vandalism under paragraph 291 of the criminal code, even if it clearly was done by a young child who is not going to be held criminally responsible but their parents will be held liable through liability rules. Or say my neighbor accidentally cut down a tree on my side of the property line, it didn't rise to the level of criminal negligence but he's still liable for cutting down the tree. It's not unheard of that I could offer a settlement offer but if refused, it would at least in theory turn into a police investigation.

      Very often these types of laws say that there will be no public prosecution without a complaint from the victim, so the government isn't going to raise a case unless you press charges but once a case has been opened it is officially a police matter. I just checked our copyright laws and for the most part they're of the same type. There's certainly no general prohibition against the police getting involved, like say in the case above with the young child if they dispute that the child caused the damage then certainly the police can choose to do interviews or seek witnesses even if it's clearly a liability matter, not a criminal matter. Of course, just because the police may do the legwork for you doesn't mean they normally will...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    28. Re:Direct link by mcmadman · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually that's exactly how it works. You don't call the police directly like you're reporting robbery though. Your lawyers see a judge and file charges and obtain a warrant. THEN the police get involved and go to the defendant and gather evidence. Those extra steps are required, in theory, to make sure that a crime is likely taking place before the police get involved. At some point a judge approved this raid before it happened. The plaintiff presented evidence to support their claim, had their i's dotted and t's crossed, got the warrant, and in came the cops. That's sometimes how civil cases go.

      Well as far as the Finnish laws go, the investigating police officer can issue a search warrant for anyone's home if there is "a reasonable suspicion". Whatever this "reasonable suspicion" can be, is up to anyone's guess. No need for a judge just yet. This procedure shows just how rotten a police state this country has become.

    29. Re:Direct link by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 2

      Any other law violation you either get searched/charged or let off the hook. How about next time you are charged with (actual) theft, someone calls you first and offers to pay 600 euros to avoid the hassle? Why is this a valid option for copyright violation accusations?

      Unfortunately, "any other law" doesn't apply here. This is a civil violation, not a criminal one. Its not theft, it's copyright violation. It's extortion to demand money not to turn someone in for a criminal violation, but in civil matters you are free to offer a deal in exchange for not pressing charges. In criminal cases, the D.A. is the one pressing the charges, and in civil cases it's the plaintiff's lawyer, which is why they have the option.

      The plaintiffs aren't the problem here. The police aren't the problem either. The plaintiffs are simply taking advantage of the law as written for their own benefit, and the police are just playing along by the rules as required. It's the Bad Law that's to blame. You can't blame companies and greedy people for being greedy, it's what they DO. You can't blame the police for enforcing the law, it's also what they DO. The only one to blame is your legislator, who created the Bad Law, whom you voted in. That means blame yourself, and work to get the laws changed.

      A bad law is one that causes more harm than it prevents. You can blame the police for enforcing a bad law. As long as people are willing to enforce bad laws those laws will remain.

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
    30. Re:Direct link by fido_dogstoyevsky · · Score: 2

      Any other law violation you either get searched/charged or let off the hook. How about next time you are charged with (actual) theft, someone calls you first and offers to pay 600 euros to avoid the hassle? Why is this a valid option for copyright violation accusations?

      Unfortunately, "any other law" doesn't apply here. This is a civil violation, not a criminal one. Its not theft, it's copyright violation. It's extortion to demand money not to turn someone in for a criminal violation, but in civil matters you are free to offer a deal in exchange for not pressing charges. In criminal cases, the D.A. is the one pressing the charges, and in civil cases it's the plaintiff's lawyer, which is why they have the option.

      The plaintiffs aren't the problem here. The police aren't the problem either. The plaintiffs are simply taking advantage of the law as written for their own benefit, and the police are just playing along by the rules as required. It's the Bad Law that's to blame. You can't blame companies and greedy people for being greedy, it's what they DO. You can't blame the police for enforcing the law, it's also what they DO. The only one to blame is your legislator, who created the Bad Law, whom you voted in. That means blame yourself, and work to get the laws changed.

      Reposting because I pressed the wrong button:

      A bad law is one that causes more harm than it prevents. You can blame the police for enforcing a bad law. As long as people are willing to enforce bad laws those laws will remain. Changing bad laws via the ballot box takes a long time, enforcing those laws while we're waiting will do more harm.

      --
      It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
    31. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, "any other law" doesn't apply here. This is a civil violation, not a criminal one. Its not theft, it's copyright violation.

      Police are investigating it as a copyright crime. I have no idea why tho, since according to law the bare minimum is that it requires that it's done for profit.

    32. Re:Direct link by bennies · · Score: 1

      Yeah my 5 year old just installed a shit load of software on my tablet. She might still still miss the data I acquired during my life time but her logic is almost always spot on. Don't ever underestimate them.

    33. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so fvkcing easy to click on links in the browser and get a torrent download started, even an ADULT could do it. Any child can do it without a problem. The trick is sometimes finding the torrent or magnet link in the first place.

      Seriously. The word is "fucking". Just type it. This is Slashdot. You will not get marked down for cussing. Don't be a pussy.

    34. Re:Direct link by hawkinspeter · · Score: 2

      Says the anonymous fucking coward

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    35. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This procedure shows just how rotten a police state this country has become.

      Well, yes, Finland has always been very much a police state, but the Finns almost unanimously like it that way. The police regularly regularly get a 90+% approval rating in opinion polls.

    36. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an educator... no. Certainly there are some kids who know a bit about technology, but by and large, most kids only know how to access Facebook.

      It's a myth that children of this generation are generally technology savvy, I'm afraid.

    37. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my 6 year old could manage this...

    38. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plaintiffs aren't the problem here. The police aren't the problem either. The plaintiffs are simply taking advantage of the law as written for their own benefit, and the police are just playing along by the rules as required.

      Legal and moral is not the same thing. There is plenty of things you can do that is technically legal but only a complete asshole would do.

      The plaintiffs are a problem and the police is a problem. This doesn't rule out that the law also is a problem.

    39. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if her parents wanted music, they'd probably have to ask the same 9 year old to install the application for them.

      Were you never a nine year old with parents who didn't understand "that computer stuff"?

    40. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there I thought this was the laptop in question

    41. Re:Direct link by tubs · · Score: 1

      > common law [wikipedia.org] system, which is not used that much outside the US

      And the sun never sets on the British Empire :-)

      --

      try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    42. Re:Direct link by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      In the article it states she searched in google which lead to the piratebay where she downloaded some files but they didn't work.

      You make the leap that she must have used the torrent files with a torrent client. It makes more sense that she tried to play the torrent files in her music player which is why they didn't work.

      That sounds reasonable for a 9 year old and the father buying her the cd that sounds reasonable and refusing to "settle" for music files that were not downloaded also a reasonable action.

      Was the trigger for the raid evidence of downloading of the .torrent file or evidence of the IP of the nine year old being in the swarm? Also if the IP was in the swarm was the download complete or is a partial download enough, if so here is part of your next download 10.

      Below a certain age, you just don't prosecute children even if it was an adult it would be theft, usually the shopkeeper and the parent(s) of the child will get together and have words with the child usually ending with the child apologising to the shop keeper. That is reasonable behaviour, an 8 am raid on a house and the seizing of the childs laptop isn't in any way reasonable.

      As a parent you do not want your children breaking the law, I think most parents would having found that their young child went to pirate bay to download music would have said no you cant do that it's wrong and bought them the CD as that is the proper way to get the music. It's just one of the lessons of life that parents teach their kids.

      You also teach your kids to stand up for themselves and don't be bullied, and stand up for your principles. If all that was downloaded was the torrent files who wouldn't refuse to settle ?

    43. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On your "Winnie The Pooh" laptop?

      It appears to be a fully functional laptop, it's not some kind of Fisher-Price toy. If it's her laptop, she probably knows how to use it.
      Is this about her being a girl? Would anyone doubt this if it was a nine year old boy and his Transformers laptop?

    44. Re:Direct link by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      If it's a civil case why are the police involved in a raid, why is there even a raid, what happen to the regular discovery processes? Also why is it illegal to download a file you find on the internet? Everything on the internet is automatically copyrighted, how am I to know if someone uploaded it without the owners permission? Sounds to me like the crime in this racket is not paying the extortion. As you say everyone is playing by the rules so the problem is the law that makes this an acceptable behavior. The MAFFIA have tried their hardest to criminalize downloading here in Australia, so far they have been told to fuck off since the damages actually incurred don't even add up to the $50 minimum required to get a hearing in the small claims court.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    45. Re:Direct link by hutsell · · Score: 1

      The "article" mostly quotes from Torrent Freak. Here's the longer source:
      http://torrentfreak.com/police-raid-9-year-old-pirate-bay-girl-confiscate-winnie-the-pooh-laptop-121122/

      Although I'm not vouching for the accuracy of the following, I thought it might be interesting to include what appears to be a legitimate post at torrentfreak a few hours ago by the father:

      As a father of this 10-years girl, I would like to thank you all for a huge support in this case. We are still devestited of what happened, and my girl is still almoust in tears. I will take this as far it goes, and seek for justice for all other cases like this around a globe. Hopefully finnish justice system will find this as fucked up as most of Finnish & Europes social media, and regular people does. Thanx once again, it really matters a lot for us! Love & respect, Julietta & his Dad ps. Sorry for my bad English. Facebook: Aki"weq"Nylund

      Everything looks proper, including the link to the facebook page; my apologies in advance if anything turns out to be otherwise. Fwiw, if it hasn't already been mentioned, the actual download that has caused the recent arrest happened in 2011.

      --
      Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
    46. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need some cops on board to join the cause and then we can join the Prime Minister and other prominent political/business figures in their own homes for breakfast whenever we please!

    47. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that has to do with anything?

    48. Re:Direct link by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      It was ironic that someone posting as anonymous coward was telling someone else to not be a pussy and type the word "fucking" properly.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    49. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then there would be no violation at all, so there should be no police raiding the home.

    50. Re:Direct link by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      once she gets her new My Little Pony rig

      I thought those were targeted at 18-35 year old guys now.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    51. Re:Direct link by raynet · · Score: 1

      Too bad that the news are not telling which browser was used, if it was Opera it would be as simple as clicking on a link to a torrent-file to download it.

      --
      - Raynet --> .
    52. Re:Direct link by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      And it never will, so long as we hold onto the Falklands.

    53. Re:Direct link by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 0

      my girl is still almost in tears

      I am chocked, how could they. I got the same problem when my six year old shoplifted some candy.

    54. Re:Direct link by dropadrop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any other law violation you either get searched/charged or let off the hook. How about next time you are charged with (actual) theft, someone calls you first and offers to pay 600 euros to avoid the hassle? Why is this a valid option for copyright violation accusations?

      Unfortunately, "any other law" doesn't apply here. This is a civil violation, not a criminal one. Its not theft, it's copyright violation. It's extortion to demand money not to turn someone in for a criminal violation, but in civil matters you are free to offer a deal in exchange for not pressing charges. In criminal cases, the D.A. is the one pressing the charges, and in civil cases it's the plaintiff's lawyer, which is why they have the option.

      The plaintiffs aren't the problem here. The police aren't the problem either. The plaintiffs are simply taking advantage of the law as written for their own benefit, and the police are just playing along by the rules as required. It's the Bad Law that's to blame. You can't blame companies and greedy people for being greedy, it's what they DO. You can't blame the police for enforcing the law, it's also what they DO. The only one to blame is your legislator, who created the Bad Law, whom you voted in. That means blame yourself, and work to get the laws changed.

      Well actually the police are partially to blame here. While a warrant is not required to confiscate computers from somebody's home in Finnish law, search is researved for cases that could produce 6 months in jail and cause "significant damage". The police has decided that downloading 1 cd caused significant damage and could result in 6 months of jail which required quite creative reasoning from them.

    55. Re:Direct link by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      It's the tidbits like this that make me feel warm and fuzzy about copyright and police:

      Its the job of the poilce to enforce the laws, nothing more, nothing less. In this case they were just doing the job that your ( if you are local to the story anyway ) tax dollars are paying them to do. A policy of 'selective enforcement of law' is NOT a path you want to go down.

      Now I dont like the situation anymore than the next guy, but blame the people responsible, the legislature, and not the cop on the street.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    56. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am chocked, how could they. I got the same problem when my six year old copied some candy.

      FTFY.

    57. Re:Direct link by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Why? The dad could have[...]
      Also, maybe she likes Winnie and [...]

      Yes, he could, and yes, she might.
      Which is why I stated that there might be a [b]correlation[/b], and, indeed, that she might have the technical skills. It was an attempt to starve off replies like yours, but apparently it failed miserably.

    58. Re:Direct link by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      Actually that's exactly how it works. You don't call the police directly like you're reporting robbery though. Your lawyers see a judge and file charges and obtain a warrant. THEN the police get involved and go to the defendant and gather evidence.

      I am not a lawyer, and this is a different country we are talking about. But I was under the impression that you have to actually sue the opposing party in civil court _first_. Then warrant may be given to perform discovery of whatever judge allows you to discover

      Otherwise where exactly would this evidence go to? Some evidence is sent directly to the judge (and there is no judge).

      It would be pretty hilarious if the police can just take the girl's laptop directly to the (civilly) suing party. Do they (CIAPC) have to give the laptop back? How long do they have to preform discovery? Does police perform their own forensic analysis during a civil lawsuit?

      There's a third option, available in most countries, referred to as an Anton Piller order (from the original case it came up in). You can sue someone, but before serving papers on them (so they don't know they're being sued), you can go to the judge and request a seizure order. Then, you show up at their place with the cops, serve the complaint and seizure order, and take the seized equipment back to the judge. They're typically used in situations where it's highly likely that the defendant will destroy evidence if they find out they're being sued - copyright and trademark infringement cases, mainly.
      In most jurisdictions, the plaintiff also has to put up a large monetary bond for the seized equipment, which is given to the defendant if the case fails (so that you can't just destroy someone's business by filing a frivolous suit, seizing all of their equipment, drawing the case out for a long time, and then losing).

    59. Re:Direct link by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I wonder about the nondisclosure agreememt, too.

      One of the side effects of law enforcement is loud, public punishment, to hopefully deter future criminals. This sounds more like an extortion plot they want kept hidden hoping, hoping, hoping it continues.

      If it walks like a scam and talks like a scam and involves lawyers like a scam...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    60. Re:Direct link by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Clearly, the 9 year old doesn't have a credit card, so she typed in "free" with the song she wanted. It didn't work, but said she needed "bittorrent" to get it to work. Another google search and she was done (unless she already had a browser like Opera with bittorrent installed). My 5 year old could do that, if I let him. At 9, I'd let him...

      Your assumption that dad did it and blamed the 9 year old doesn't seem logical. Like someone else said, I was programming my own games (at 9, they were more fun to program than play) and a heavy-duty sneakernet pirate.

    61. Re:Direct link by MrL0G1C · · Score: 2

      Oh, you can't say greed is wrong, that's blasphemy against the capitalist religion.

      Greed is good.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    62. Re:Direct link by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      my 6 year old could manage this...

      That statement implies you have had sex with a woman , and quite frankly I find that hard to believe.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    63. Re:Direct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg that's gold, well played sir!

    64. Re:Direct link by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And do you agree to the converse? If on the pooh laptop, then the 9-year old did it, not the daddy.

    65. Re:Direct link by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      If the Pooh doesn't fit you must acquit.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    66. Re:Direct link by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I know a girl who could be described as a 'hacker'(quick call the police) who has a Hello Kitty laptop.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    67. Re:Direct link by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      IANAL but I am pretty sure that she would have to be in the swarm for any action to be initiated.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    68. Re:Direct link by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I know a girl who could be described as a 'hacker'(quick call the police) who has a Hello Kitty laptop.

      Thus my "Sure, she could be clever or good with computers".
      That something seems less likely doesn't preclude it from being the case. Neither does it lend credence to it being the case either.

      The simplest solution is that this guy downloaded stuff and blames it on someone who's beyond the law. That doesn't mean it has to be the truth, and it's up to the accusers to attempt to prove it.

    69. Re:Direct link by randyleepublic · · Score: 1

      Don't feel bad. The USofA is hot on your trail. We'll show you how to do police state RIGHT!

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    70. Re:Direct link by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      The simplest solution is that this guy downloaded stuff and blames it on someone who's beyond the law.

      This makes no sense at all, because (as the case itself demonstrated) blaming her would still cause charges to degenerate to him as her legal guardian, so it would be a pointless extra step, unless you're adding the extra and unlikely part that he planned to make it a PR nightmare in the event he got caught.

      Virg

    71. Re:Direct link by arth1 · · Score: 1

      blaming her would still cause charges to degenerate to him as her legal guardian

      This is Sweden, not USA. A guardian is not automatically responsible for the actions of the guarded. If he taught the child to do the act, he'd be guilty, and if he showed gross negligence, he'd be guilty of negligent child rearing, and might perhaps lose custody.

      The idea that someone has to be blamed is pretty unique to conservative Abrahamic religion countries, and stems back to the "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" found in the scriptures. In other words, it's bunk.

      Loss due to actions where there's no culpability and redress is part of the price of doing business. And insurance companies sell policies to guard against just that, to offset the costs over time.

    72. Re:Direct link by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      This is Sweden, not USA. A guardian is not automatically responsible for the actions of the guarded. If he taught the child to do the act, he'd be guilty, and if he showed gross negligence, he'd be guilty of negligent child rearing, and might perhaps lose custody. The idea that someone has to be blamed is pretty unique to conservative Abrahamic religion countries, and stems back to the "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" found in the scriptures. In other words, it's bunk.

      And yet, here we are reading about it happening, so I'm guessing that it's not as much bunk as you claim.

      Virg

    73. Re:Direct link by arth1 · · Score: 1

      And yet, here we are reading about it happening, so I'm guessing that it's not as much bunk as you claim.

      Um, no. That's not what's happening. What's happening is that they cannot go after the kid, and they cannot automatically go after the guy because of what his kid might have done, like they could in, say, USA. That's what's happening.

      The raid is collecting evidence, and does not imply who, if any, is being charged.

  10. for the last time by alienzed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not theft if the original owner still has it.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
    1. Re:for the last time by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Informative

      The laptop's owner no longer has it. So a theft did occur, under false colour of law.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:for the last time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck everyone who modded this funny! You idiots are the ones who spread the imaginary property mindset in the first place! Without you idiots, the above would never be possible, since people would not see it as justified in the first place!

      Mod parent insightful!

      Also, here's a nice analogy: They let somebody else do hard work, and then took that, make a copy, which took zero work, and want me to pay for that... Well alright then, I'll take the money made with somebody else's hard work, make a copy (complete with stamp, invalidating it as legal tender), which takes zero work, and will pay them with that.
      What, Content Mafia? Don't like that it's just a worthless copy that took no real work? Well, now you know how I feel, and why you can go fuck yourselves and die in a corner.

      Creating information is a service, always has been, and always will be. It's a law of nature, like gravity. Lying about it might make people think it doesn't exist for you (still talking to the Content Mafia), but it won't make it go away. And there will be a time when they look behind the curtain... and club you to death for stealing money from everyone of us, as well as for abusing artists!

    3. Re:for the last time by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Dude, take a Valium.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    4. Re:for the last time by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Dude, take a Valium.

      ...and two cups of tea.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:for the last time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for writing colour instead of color.

    6. Re:for the last time by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Also, here's a nice analogy: They let somebody else do hard work, and then took that, make a copy, which took zero work, and want me to pay for that... Well alright then, I'll take the money made with somebody else's hard work, make a copy (complete with stamp, invalidating it as legal tender), which takes zero work, and will pay them with that.

      Hmm. So a major record company lets an artist do hard work, then took that, made a copy (which took zero work) and want you to pay for it? That's their fucking business model.

      Well alright then, I'll take the money made with somebody else's hard work, make a copy (complete with stamp, invalidating it as legal tender), which takes zero work, and will pay them with that.

      That's exactly what's been alleged to happen. So why the fuck are you bitching that it's happened? Fucking hypocrit.

      Creating information is a service, always has been, and always will be.

      This is why people are willing to pay for this service. This is why people do pay for this service. This is why the people that consume the service (e.g. by downloading music from the internet) pay the most in return.

      Where the whole thing fucking breaks is the greedy cunts like you at the music distribution companies that want more money than people can afford to give, that bribe politicians into passing corrupt laws, that charge asinine prices for decades old music that's already made its creators millionaires.

      On a sympathy scale of "oh dear" to "you poor thing" I'm afraid I'm coming in somewhere around the "this baby seal's fur will make me $2 so get the fuck out of my way or I'll club you to death too" level.

  11. TFA is a travesty; here's a REAL article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect this is the article TFA refers to:

    http://torrentfreak.com/police-raid-9-year-old-pirate-bay-girl-confiscate-winnie-the-pooh-laptop-121122/

  12. EXTORTION, real honest to goodness extortion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I threaten to reveal a crime you did, and demand money in exchange, that's extortion.

    Which is exactly the problem with these 'dual' laws. The police become the arm of an extortion racket, where the reason for paying up is the threat of a police raid.

    What CIAPC did WAS EXTORTION, because they could not offer him immunity from a copyright infringement claim or criminal claim against him. Their claim to pay up 600 euros or they go to the police is therefore cleancut extortion. The NDA is confirmation that they know its extortion.

    1. Re:EXTORTION, real honest to goodness extortion by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Sue them on grounds of attempted extortion.

  13. Re:Slashdot and my real life meet for the first ti by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Don't lie. This is Slashdot. It was your mom who told you her friend's daughter's laptop was seized.

  14. DO NOT MESS WITH VIKINGS !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are purple people eaters !! And they will eat bears for breakfast !! And if you streal you must pay the fine, and keep quiet about it !! OR ELSE !!

    1. Re:DO NOT MESS WITH VIKINGS !! by Buchenskjoll · · Score: 1

      The Fins were never vikings. The Scandinavians were, though.

      --
      -- Make America hate again!
  15. It's a Matrix prequel, Matrix Origins: Trinity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Touch me and that hand will never touch anything again.

  16. I bet she was running a honey pot. by PDX · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet the kid was running a honey pot. What else was a Pooh to do?

    1. Re:I bet she was running a honey pot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Poo? ;)

    2. Re:I bet she was running a honey pot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      honey pot

      No, this is a real kid, not an FBI agent or Chris Hansen.

  17. Goood work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    nice to see police actually doing something useful.

  18. She has stolen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    She has stolen the valuable property that belongs to others. Destroy her. Make an example out of her, to frighten other criminal children away from sharing ILLEGAL music. Consume her soul. We must protect the financial rights of immaterial property owners at all cost. Throw her in jail. Let her rot. If she dies it will serve as a warning to others. Support your industry rights organizations today. Buy now.

  19. Winnie Done Poohed When She Saw Them Coppers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you have seen Winnie's pooh you know that it is not a pretty sight. Not a prety sight. My condolences to the Raiders. You do not get paid enough. May you tromp down many a door in your futures. God Bless, and Hail Mary.

  20. Re:Slashdot and my real life meet for the first ti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no reason to call him a liar. For all we know, he might be having an inappropriate relationship with his mother.
    I think you owe him an apology.

  21. NAS Drive by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

    Whew... Good thing they would never find the NAS drive or Sheva Plug that were actually responsible for the download. (No.)

    Reminder to everyone... Create a guest network with 40 bit WEP and have a NAS device with an onboard Bit Torrent client do all your dirty work.

    Might as well start using strategies of real criminals if this is the response. Might get you chance at unreasonable search and seizure.

    1. Re:NAS Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminder to everyone... Create a guest network with 40 bit WEP and have a NAS device with an onboard Bit Torrent client do all your dirty work.

      Right, they'll never think to take the odd-looking computer box thing with the blinky lights. Nope.

    2. Re:NAS Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be a good idea to disugise it as something like a Wheaties cereal box.

    3. Re:NAS Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how would they know to look behind a wall? To get access to it, you would need to take hammer and rip wall apart.

      Have you ever seen how powerlines goes behind walls etc? There are lots of space to have a NAS in such. Of course you need to take wall apart as well when NAS fails but it isn't hard job than 1-2 hours from handy man.

      And remember, NAS needs to have its own hidden network and you need to have at computers a hidden access to it so when they study your WLAN router and your computer network logs, they don't find out that device is at your home. Oh, and your home network needs to be open so you can blame others (and live at such area so someone would do so).

    4. Re:NAS Drive by ledow · · Score: 1

      An interesting thought - I wonder how rigorous the average police search is.

      As someone that just bought three Gigabit powerline-Ethernet devices, it would (as a thought experiment) be a cinch to put two of them to work to push a connection around your house and the third ANYWHERE on the household electrical wiring to pull off an Internet connection (hell, it could be at the bottom of the garden or inside a security light, or in the walls, or in the loft).

      Unlike an Ethernet or Wi-fi device which would advertise its connection to the local LAN and router, a powerline device would be a lot more subtle (and if you've retrieved two, you probably wouldn't think there might be a third, fourth, fifth).

      Sure, you might find a MAC address reference in logs of the router somewhere to a third device (which would be identifiable as a powerline unit, I suspect) but it's unlikely that such logs exist on a home network if you have, for example, DHCP turned off. And that's all the sort of investigation that would have to take place in the computer forensics departments, not during any "raid".

      Even a wireless device would advertise itself and be easily discoverable with even the toy wifi finders you can get from ThinkGeek, but a powerline device? To prove it existed, you'd need to connect to the household wiring with some quite advanced tech, I should think, before the homeowner is "released" to remove any such devices.

      To find it, without knowing it existed, would be quite unlikely. With a bit of homebrew, you could probably join the powerline functionality into an Ethernet wall-socket or mid-way along a cable run and not even notice the whole powerline network is there and cabled into the local network.

      I have much more boring uses, though. I'm going to use the third plug to let my CCTV control unit be installed into the loft out of the reach of probing fingers and that single socket can then provide networking and power (and I can shove the noisy spinning-fan box with the UPS up into the loft but still remote-access it).

    5. Re:NAS Drive by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Or hide it inside a wall.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:NAS Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. If we take the RIAA outsourcing violence as a given and as a trend, I can see them eventually helping your behind.the-wall server along to become a fire hazard..

  22. Re:Slashdot and my real life meet for the first ti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe not in Finnish, but in English it is.

  23. Note to law enforcement by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you find yourself taking a Winnie the Pooh laptop from a 9 year old, you've probably gone over a line or two somewhere.

    1. Re:Note to law enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In America, the police would shoot the 9 year old girl.

    2. Re:Note to law enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cops don't care. They are numb to reason, morality and common sense; either because they were sociopaths on a power-trip to begin with or because they once intended well but got worn down by a corrupt system.

      This in turn makes them outcasts of society and reinforces their "us vs. them" attitude. They lost sight of who they were supposed to protect and lack the ability to question their superiors, i.e. lobby groups and politicians.

    3. Re:Note to law enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, if you take a child's teddy bear and it has a ton of cash or cocaine in its neck, have you crossed the line? Probably if you ripped the teady bear's head off in front of the child but besides that if you're being raided, they need to check every possible place where the data may be.

    4. Re:Note to law enforcement by sjames · · Score: 1

      You probably crossed several lines on the way to the child's room :-)

      A teddy bear is not a Winnie the Pooh laptop. However, you should be able to examine the bear without harming it and return it to the child on the spot. Meanwhile, since I oppose the War on drugs, I would say the line was crossed quite a few steps back in that case.

    5. Re:Note to law enforcement by epSos-de · · Score: 1

      It is even more outraging, if you consider who paid the police and which side are they standing at. We must thank Hollywood for how they keep our European police as their pets and the Europeans pay the police wages, instead of the Hollywood paying to them directly. All is great for Hollywood. They were predicting oppressive dictatorships in their movies, becasue they wanted to start one in reality.

  24. Can't find a pirate? by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    Go after the cabin boy (or girl in this case).

  25. i was programming games at 12 by CHRONOSS2008 · · Score: 0

    its not hard and on a vic 20 in the early 80s was by 13 doing animations and graphical games...
    what would be so hard to use google that prolly all your friends at school teach you and the school to use and then show you how to install the app.
    you think a 9 year old is a retard, no sir it is you that are.

  26. I call for the Anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, it should be noted that this happened in Finland (Scandinavia is pretty vague).

    Second, I am begging for the Anonymous to target their efforts on TTVK, the body behind this also.

     

  27. Re:Sensational! Poor Kid, Walk the plank. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0

    So, who in their right mind is actually PAYING FOR an operating system?

    Oh, never mind. The insane usually have little idea that they are out of touch with reality.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  28. retards by tracius01 · · Score: 0

    WINNIE THE POOH laptop it's not a real laptop, it's a toy http://edukid.ro/jucarii/images/5750/2782.jpg

  29. Finland by Kupfernigk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think you need to know some history. Despite its apparent liberalism after WW2, Finland was on the side of Germany and many Finns were happy with Nazi racial doctrines. It's Norway and Iceland that were the socially liberal states, Sweden more imperialistic and Finland most North Germanic. It hasn't "become a police state", it has always had strong authoritarian tendencies.

    Think what the reputation of Scandinavia was in the Dark Ages and the Middle Ages, and you will get the point (note- before anybody accuses me of trolling, in real life I have a surname of Scandinavian origin. I just don't buy into the myth that Scandinavia is some pareadise of uncorrupt liberalism.)

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Finland by kyrsjo · · Score: 1

      Well, despite of your "name of Scandinavian origin", you forgot one of the main countries in the region (*). Also, while most people of Norwegian decent in the US seems to be pickup-wielding Romniators, Obama is far-right compared to most of the people living in the country today (but admittedly, a bit more likable than most of our own outer right politicians). And while there are differences in culture and policy between the countries of Scandinavia, some of which might be the deeper reason for the historical facts you point to, the similarities are larger. Its all social democracy over here, and even the supposedly right-wing parties would never ever challenge that (with the exception of small groups of often somewhat crazy people, which are about as popular here as communists in the US...) - just how its organized.

      (*) Denmark - I'll leave it up to you to explain their culture based on WW2/Napoleonic war allegiances.

  30. Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Considering that downloading copyrighted material is completely legal in Finland. It's the sharing that's illegal..

  31. Local internet TV CEO sent an open letter to CIAPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Translation mine:)

    Dear CIAPC: No, we won't join your organization. Fuck off.

    https://twitter.com/MoonTVfi/status/271589215245049858 :-D

  32. Oh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bother.

  33. Having not broken the law, IS, though. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the file wasn't the one copyrighted. If it had been, it would have played.

  34. AFAIK and technically speaking by itmo · · Score: 1

    Finland is not even in scandinavia. but fennoscandia. Again, AFAIK, the story is that the daughter wanted to buy a record from an artist called Chisu, but since they cost a lot, she wanted to try first. Father said "google it and check it on the internet". Somehow the girl ended up torrenting it (plausible, torrent is apparently 4th result on google search) and got a copy which did not work. One year later they get a letter to pay 600 euro in _damages_ not a fine and an NDA, or it will go to police. When they refused, the police made a normal search. Which is very interesting legally , since this is a very borderline case. Search should only be possible for a "Tekijänoikeusrikos"(copyright crime) ,not "tekijänoikeusrikkomus"(copyright misdemeanor). The difference between these two is either profiting from the copyright violation OR causing "severe damage" to the right holder. Since they asked for 600 euro , I dont know if the damage is "severe". Also they seized the laptop although (AFAIK,IANAL) law apparently says that they should only seize the whole laptop if there is a pressing reason for it, they could just have seized or copied the data. IMO there cannot be a pressing reason if the case was filed 1 year after the fact.

  35. Re:AFAIK and technically speaking by itmo · · Score: 1

    also if you need information on this case, I suggest you try contacting EFFI ry in finland. (finnish EFF)

  36. They sure showed her by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

    It takes real balls to go up against such a dangerous criminal and intimidate her.

  37. Double standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And don't forget, when someone steals your computer, and you call the cops and say "My computer has been stolen, and I know where it is due to locating software on it.", the cops say they can't do anything about it. (I've seen that come up a few times now.)

    But when you infringe copyright (not steal, like they like to say) on a song, the cops break down your door.

  38. Tools & Practises? --- Re:Sensational! by Jansku · · Score: 1

    6) Kukilainen from TTVK makes a note saying, "we only track IPs and we will take this to court"

    You mean Kotilainen?

    Is there a way, or have people analyzed the possible honey-trap files allegedly used? Steganographend information would be hard to find but I'd be interested to know what is the current practical situation on the topic?

    What kind of products there are on the market?

    Which companies TTVK/CIAPC use as their contractors to do this?

  39. Re:Sensational! Poor Kid, Walk the plank. by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    So, who in their right mind is actually PAYING FOR an operating system?

    Those forced to by an insane world.

    I can't buy a decent laptop without handing some of my money to Microsoft.

  40. A serious matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We have to find a way to make sure everyone knows we are seriously against piracy. What could we do?"
    "We could rape a child, that shit's serious."

  41. The holy grail by alexo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Big Media, winning hearts and minds.

    The holy grail of the middleman is to set himself up to be the gate keeper of an essential good or service.

    Since monopolizing access to air, water, food or sex did not pan out, they went after the next thing -- culture.
    And, I must admit, with great success. With the eager participation of most (if not all) "free" national governments, partaking in your own culture is no longer free, and the full force of the state is applied against those who would dare to oppose this "arrangement".

    Have no doubt, there is a lot of wealth and power involved and, given their corrupting influence, things will only get worse in time.
    Nothing short of a violent and bloody revolution can reverse this trend.

    1. Re:The holy grail by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Nothing short of a violent and bloody revolution can reverse this trend.

      This just isn't true. If the people really cared about this issue, they could get it changed via the ballot box. It's just that they don't care as much as you do, so you want to act like a psychopath who doesn't get his way.

    2. Re:The holy grail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go study Gandi, all we need to do is withdraw our support for them, don't go to the movies, buy cds etc. Pirate as you like, infact seed torrents and make it easier for others to pirate. But do give money to artists that provide their work without drm and dont support the current copyright.

    3. Re:The holy grail by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      Where is your evidence that only a violent and bloody revolution can reverse this trend?

      Have you tried, I don't know, convincing lots of people to your point of view?

    4. Re:The holy grail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing short of a violent and bloody revolution can reverse this trend.

      Entrench power lead to many bloody revolutions in the past and the new boss was always just as bad. Recently, we've switched to democracy, which amazingly allows for non-violet revolution. Sadly, we've never solved the problem of the old boss being just as bad as the new boss, but it's nice to see revolutionary change without much bloodshed.

    5. Re:The holy grail by alexo · · Score: 1

      Nothing short of a violent and bloody revolution can reverse this trend.

      This just isn't true. If the people really cared about this issue, they could get it changed via the ballot box.

      Really? Still smoking that "hope and change" dope, are you?

      Go read Douglas Adams, it's good for you.
      Or, if reading is not your forte, go watch The Simpsons (skip to 13:22).

      “If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal.”
      (attributed to Emma Goldman, Jello Biafra and others)

      It's just that they don't care as much as you do, so you want to act like a psychopath who doesn't get his way.

      Apparently reading comprehension is not one of your strong points.

      Let's try something else: "Nothing short of a miracle can reverse this trend."
      See, now I'm a saint!

    6. Re:The holy grail by alexo · · Score: 1

      Go study Gandi [sic]

      Go study the political climate that made Gandhi's non-vilence possible and effective, and why it would not work today.

    7. Re:The holy grail by alexo · · Score: 2

      Where is your evidence that only a violent and bloody revolution can reverse this trend?

      If you want non-refutable evidence that would stand up to scientific scrutiny, I'm afraid I have to disappoint you.

      Have you tried, I don't know, convincing lots of people to your point of view?

      I have tried convincing people that voting for the lesser evil only perpetuates evil.
      I have tried convincing people that power without accountability (e.g., police) only leads to abuse and corruption.
      I have tried convincing people that being "tough on crime" by criminalizing more things and increasing punishments instead of concentrating on rehabilitation and giving alternative does not really reduce crime, just makes more criminals.
      Several years ago, when Ontario held a referendum, I have tried convincing people that Mixed-Proportional is a much better system than First-Past-The-Post.
      Lather, rinse, repeat...

      So, allow me to answer your question with an Inigo Montoya quote:
      "it's been twenty years now and I'm starting to lose confidence".

    8. Re:The holy grail by alexo · · Score: 1

      Recently, we've switched to democracy, which amazingly allows for non-violet revolution.

      Not when your only "democratic" choice is whether to vote for Kang or for Kodos.

      A real democracy, whether direct or representative, only works with an informed and active populace, that is concerned about its rights and the principles of good governance and is willing to suffer inconveniences to protect them.

      Otherwise, you only get the illusion of democracy that serves only to stop you from violently revolting by providing a false hope.

    9. Re:The holy grail by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Really? Still smoking that "hope and change" dope, are you?

      I never did in the first place.

      Go read Douglas Adams, it's good for you.
      Or, if reading is not your forte, go watch The Simpsons (skip to 13:22).

      Now that's funny, because I'm willing to bet the creators of those works believed in copyright.

      Let's try something else: "Nothing short of a miracle can reverse this trend."

      History has shown that if enough people care about an issue, the policies can change in response -- the key being that enough people have to actually care.

    10. Re:The holy grail by denelson83 · · Score: 1

      If the people really cared about this issue, they could get it changed via the ballot box.

      Won't work if all of the candidates are in the pockets of Big Money.

    11. Re:The holy grail by lonecrow · · Score: 1

      The holy grail of the middleman is to set himself up to be the gate keeper of an essential good or service. Nice choice of words considering the biggest gate keeping extortionist of them all, the pope.

    12. Re:The holy grail by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Then elect a candidate that isn't. That's the whole point. If you can't do it, then the people don't care enough.

    13. Re:The holy grail by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 2

      “I have been repeating over and over again that he who cannot protect himself or his nearest and dearest or their honour by non-violently facing death may and ought to do so by violently dealing with the oppressor. He who can do neither of the two is a burden. He has no business to be the head of a family. He must either hide himself, or must rest content to live for ever in helplessness and be prepared to crawl like a worm at the bidding of a bully” - Gandhi

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    14. Re:The holy grail by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      No, I don't need irrefutable evidence...any evidence at all would do.

      You are surprised that one man trying to convince people of things hasn't changed the world in a short amount of time.

      I never said it would be easy.  But if you study the history or violnet revolution, I believe you will find that 9 times out of 10 the cure is much, much worse than the disease.  See: Iran, Cuba, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Congo, etc. etc. etc.

    15. Re:The holy grail by alexo · · Score: 1

      No, I don't need irrefutable evidence...any evidence at all would do.

      The only evidence that I can present is that nothing else has worked so far.

      You are surprised that one man trying to convince people of things hasn't changed the world in a short amount of time.

      Let my fix that for you:

      I am disappointed that one man trying to convince people of things hasn't made a iota of a difference in two and a half decades.

      I never said it would be easy. But if you study the history or violnet revolution, I believe you will find that 9 times out of 10 the cure is much, much worse than the disease. See: Iran, Cuba, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Congo, etc. etc. etc.

      I did not say that violent revolutions are good.
      I did not advocate for one.
      I did say that (IMHO implied) it is the only thing that can bring measurable change to the system, for better or worse.

  42. Re:Sensational! Poor Kid, Walk the plank. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    You can get one from one of the Linux laptop shops...for way more money, for some reason...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  43. Time to explore the POOH connection by TheRealHocusLocus · · Score: 1

    There is nothing remarkable about this news story, even the affected artist reaching out to the accused, expressing regret that the anti-piracy mechanisms have evolved into quasi-legal mantis shrimp prowling peer to peer networks to smash their blunt appendages against any IP address that they discover, even encourage piracy by seeding and delivering a greater percentage of the offending material than is permitted under fair use as part of the sting. And the mantis shrimp strike is so powerful it produces cavitation bubbles, how cute is that.

    Time to explore the Pooh connection. Pooh has been a wholly licensed asset of Walt Disney Corporation since 1961. Everyone knows that the Hundred Acre Wood is a clumsy euphemism for Bohemian Grove. Tigger's Compulsive and Ceaseless Bouncing used as a clever device to indoctrinate generations of children to passively accept the idea of Bernanke & Geithner's "Quantitative Easing: Forever!" Honey being gold, Pooh being the stooge who ever seeks it even as it is held in short supply by fiat-pumping speculators. Piglet who is very small and cannot help to point this out, representing the many countries whose small size has been used as pretext to front enormous per-capita debt grown to ridiculous proportions by arrogant and disruptive IMF lending practices. Piglet's hide is bought and paid for and he knows it.

    And The Established Practice Of Capitalizing Every Word In A Sentence can be Directly Traced To Christopher Robin. Whats Up With That. Always Busy, He Is. Doing What, I Wonder.

    The truth is out there people. Go get it and bring it back in time for dinner.

    --
    <blink>down the rabbit hole</blink>
  44. Possible hoax? by wcrowe · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The "article" (I hesitate to call it that) does not even describe the country that the alleged raid took place in, let alone the city. "Scandinavia" is not a country, but a loosely-defined region of countries, primarily Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, and depending on your definition, Finland and Iceland. I think the whole thing is made up.

    Slashdot is really going downhill. The motto needs to be changed to "Rumors for Nerds; Stuff" period.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  45. Re:Slashdot and my real life meet for the first ti by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 1

    No, it isn't.You're confusing Scandinavia and the "Nordic countries".

    --
    Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  46. Re:Sensational! Poor Kid, Walk the plank. by Raenex · · Score: 1

    Getting a laptop with Linux or no OS costs more money because of shovelware and economy of scale.

  47. Not really, this will make them look really bad. by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    It was reported earlier the same story where he was contacted, and he responded with a letter, with a picture of the winnie the pooh laptop in question. That has made the rounds of the internet sites, including slashdot.

    I read this as the farther did not comply with the blackmail, the media thugs then went and contacted poliece after reciving the letter, who then raided the home and took the laptop.

    This seems to be in line with how crazy the media assoications are. The letter was sent in regards as to how ridiclous the claim was, pointing out that the file in question was downloaded by a 9 year old on her winnie the pooh laptop, and that persuing legal action against that is silly.

    They only thing they have gotten themselves here is a PR nighmare should the news actually ever make it to mainstream media and not just fringe news sites on the internet. Seriously what were they thinking, they couldn't make themselves look worse particulary with all the crazy litigation they have done in the past. Hopefully this gives them another black eye in front of larger public who will hopfully start to take notice and start to care about this kind of behavior.

  48. Abuse of courts and police services by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    At some point the courts or the government of those courts should be going after these media assoications for abuse of both the legal system and police services. Think of all the time and money wasted on frivolous lawsuits and police resource time for these idiots. Tying up the court time, and police time for this garbage.

    They are basically using the courts and poliece as their hired thugs to extort money from people.

    Though I am sure if big media ever does have to pay, they will simply tack that loss onto their piracy "statistics" as to how much money is lost due to piracy. They fact that they have gotten away with the behavior for this long is crazy.

  49. Rodriguez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look him up, made one album in the sixties. It sold about six copies in the states. He never made it and went on with his life. A few years ago some peopel in SOuth Africa decided to look for him, there were rumors he was dead from suicide back in the 60's. It seems Rodriguez was huge in South Africa, some even claim bigger than the Beatles. For the hippies over here it would have been like owning a copy of Dylan's Blonde on Blonde, a masterpiece and something most people who were into the scene in NorthAmerica and Europe owned.

    It woudl seemhe soild a lot fo albums in South Africa but he had no idea he had sold any. Soeone was profitting from seeling his music and that was the company. And since in the sixties it would have been much harder for him to know about his sucess over there. They were able to pocket all the profits and he went on with hsi life workign odd jobs.

    They took advantage of this man and stole his money and work, these are the people we are supposed to be feeling sorry for? These are the people we are supposed to be helping?

    The sooner we get rid of these middle men the better our culture will be

  50. Blackmail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So a letter from a NGO inviting an out-of-court (civil settlement) is ignored, resulting in police action?
    This, where I live, is known as blackmail.

    For example, say a person stole an item from the shop and is stopped by shop security.
    The law is quite clear that the security has a reasonable right of detention pending the arrival of the police.
    However, they are unable to detain pending payment of some "fine".
    And they are certainly unable to bargain for "damages" on pain of police involvement.

    Also, where I live, there has to be a court order in order to go into a person's abode and said court order is only given where there is a reasonable suspicion that something is amiss. A printout on a computer screen or a phone call form the local MPAA is rarely enough.

  51. Finland in WWII by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I thought Finland allied with Nazi Germany because of the Winter War (USSR invasion of Finland in 1939) making the USSR a common enemy.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  52. Quite wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's interesting, but quite wrong.

    Finland as a country is less than a hundred years old, having been a part of both Sweden and Russia before that. It is said that Russia actually gave Finland its independence as Finns didn't really show any signs of getting with the program; Finland was given autonomy first, and in the aftermath of the communist revolution in Russia Finland gained its independence. Naturally Finland has had to exercise extreme caution to stay independent, living next to the Soviet Union, but it's too much to claim that Finns had many Nazi sympathizers, at least more than any other country in the region. Strategically, the country had to choose between Russia and Nazi Germany, and they already knew what it'd be like living under Russian rule. And in retrospect, Finland did remain independent after WW2, something that can not be said of, say, Estonia or some other Baltic countries. And Finland is definitely liberal, and has been that earlier than most European countries - see the Wikipedia article for, say, women's right to vote.

    Also the GP is partly wrong about search warrants. Warrants in Finland are given only in cases, where the maximum sentence exceeds 6 months in prison. However, considering that Finland has adopted some of Europe's tightest copyright laws (using questionable methods like having one of the figureheads of Finnish copyright industry as the sole person preparing the law proposal without any input by civil liberties groups or others), copyright violation probably falls into that category.

  53. Nightmare scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go study the political climate that made Gandhi's non-vilence [sic] possible and effective, and why it would not work today.

    Violence to force political action is even less useful today than it was in Gandhi's time. We'd all be labeled as terrorists, the government would spray us with pepperspray and rubber bullets. And raid our homes and taser our families. And we have no weapons to fight back with, what use are some 50 year old pre-ban assault rifles against black helicopters, civilian police force with tanks and armed drones.

    Of course I assume that violence is the opposite of non-violence. Do you offer a third way?

  54. eye in the sky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's like the authorities know of everything you're doing on your laptop or something.

  55. I've seen that before in 30's Chicago.. by doccus · · Score: 1

    It's called a "protection racket" "We'll charge you with a crime, but we will take a bribe to back off" Is there NOBODY that can stop this disgraceful behavior?

  56. Sue the CIAPC by syleishere · · Score: 1

    What they did snooping traffic is a clear violation of privacy, what someone does in their own house is their business. If this "scandinavia" has any self-respect, lawyers should step up to the plate, sue them hard, prevent this from happening to anyone else. Harrassing a 9 year old girl, stealing personal property(laptops etc), anyone else find this wrong?

    1. Re:Sue the CIAPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you'd be happy for terrorists and child pornographers to get away with it because they kept their stuff on their kids' laptops?

  57. Did they use guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they shoot her teddy bear?

    I bet they did. Testosterone freeks LIKE to shoot teddy bears.

  58. 9 year old home owner pirate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here we have a 9 year old savvy enough to own her own house and suppoert her father and she's still pirating. Shame.

  59. Re:Sensational! Poor Kid, Walk the plank. by Mufasa_ooh_sayitagai · · Score: 1

    Actually, you can buy a laptop from some dealers like Xotic without an OS. And the prices are generally cheaper for better hardware... Asus, Sager, and Alienware.

    I don't work for them. I'm just happy with my unmarked, ubermachine Sager.