The interesting thing with the "self-defence" debate in the US is that the same rights/means which alledgedly give possibility to "self-defend" oneself are THE SAME rights/means given to the potential aggressors to "attack."
Any person can have whatever opinions they want on the right to self-defense. The Doctor (function, not private person) would violate the hyppocratic oath in prescribing a harming device.
Me personally, I use regexp's in ed, sed, Perl &c for batch handling large number of files. I find it handy to keep the same(ish) syntax. But that's just what I do.
Electricity is not a theory, but a concept. For the other two, yes. As soon as we have the ambition to describe the world with a model (mathematical or otherwise) based on observation we must at least have the humility of calling it "our best guess" i.e. a theory.
Kind of sad when you got to take kids OUT of public education to avoid nutcases. In my world, you got nutcase ideas (like religion) you should pay extra to have them taught at school.
Again, evolution must be taught as a theory, just as global warming, just as relativity.
I've had to take child protection courses for my work with the Boy Scouts. Yeah, no-one knows what those snivveling little terrorists will get up to next. I never go without my flak jacket myself.
Slashdot Mirror
Good point, but... where I'm sitting at, yours, is a foreign country....
Whenever my brother wants to go really fast, he calls it "I'lldrive"
Quoi?
Your post does not reflect your sig, padawan.
Well, seems technically difficult in any case.
But harming even an agressor would be contrary to preserving life. "Patient" is not a legal term just as "victim" is not a medical one.
That may be so, but in legislating open sale of firearms, you are de facto providing easy access to the people likely to misuse them.
The interesting thing with the "self-defence" debate in the US is that the same rights/means which alledgedly give possibility to "self-defend" oneself are THE SAME rights/means given to the potential aggressors to "attack."
To me seems like a lose/lose situation.
Any person can have whatever opinions they want on the right to self-defense.
The Doctor (function, not private person) would violate the hyppocratic oath in prescribing a harming device.
And yes, they are two different things.
You lucky bastard!
When I were young, I were happy if I didn't have ice in the well in the morning, and that were on the hottest day of the year.
Me personally, I use regexp's in ed, sed, Perl &c for batch handling large number of files. I find it handy to keep the same(ish) syntax. But that's just what I do.
My favourite is when
http://www.foo.com/host/in/index.html
actually points to
http://www.foo.com.host.in/index.html
Got to have the eyes peeled to detect those...
Your missing reference
Electricity is not a theory, but a concept. For the other two, yes. As soon as we have the ambition to describe the world with a model (mathematical or otherwise) based on observation we must at least have the humility of calling it "our best guess" i.e. a theory.
Kind of sad when you got to take kids OUT of public education to avoid nutcases. In my world, you got nutcase ideas (like religion) you should pay extra to have them taught at school.
Again, evolution must be taught as a theory, just as global warming, just as relativity.
I think post was referring to politics being bad, rather than nuclear?
Good maybe not.
Better probably.
I never go without my flak jacket myself.
Überparent never said it would be at the same time...
That would be "pair of dice" or "pair of die".
Grammar, however, is sometimes random.
All my word documents end with ":wq"
An African or a European swallow?
Comments are funnier over on the democrats article. I'm voting for them.
(don't mod me +1 Funny or my unique decision technique will be in shambles)
in memory of course?
*doubles ram again*
An African or European gnome?